Candace Owens Debunks Official Charlie Kirk Shooting Narrative With New Ballistic Evidence From Neck Injury

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Challenges Turning Point USA to Release Charlie Kirk's Alleged Succession Video After Pam Bondi Firing

Candace Owens Challenges Turning Point USA to Release Charlie Kirk's Alleged Succession Video After Pam Bondi Firing

1:02:30

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination After Erika Kirk's Powerful Forgiveness Speech and Kash Patel Statement

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination After Erika Kirk's Powerful Forgiveness Speech and Kash Patel Statement

1:00:21

Candace Owens Becomes Number One Podcast Worldwide While Exposing Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover-Up Claims

Candace Owens Becomes Number One Podcast Worldwide While Exposing Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover-Up Claims

1:07:17

Candace Owens Debunks Official Charlie Kirk Shooting Narrative With New Ballistic Evidence From Neck Injury

Candace Owens reveals verified information about the bullet trajectory in Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting that contradicts the official story. After confirming details with multiple sources about where the bullet fragment was recovered from Kirk's neck, Owens demonstrates the impossibility of the .30-06 rifle narrative. She exposes inconsistencies in witness testimonies, raises questions about Caldera Engineering connections, mysterious plane activity, and the suppression of certain eyewitness accounts while amplifying others. Owens argues this was a coordinated operation involving multiple shooters and calls for a decentralized investigation to uncover what actually happened on that day.

October 9, 2025

Breaking Down the Official Narrative

After weeks of investigation, new information has emerged that definitively debunks the Marvel storyline we were told about Charlie Kirk's shooting. The public was informed that Charlie had healthy bones with such impressive density that he was like the "man of steel," capable of stopping a high-powered rifle round that should have gone straight through his neck. Andrew Kolvet from Turning Point USA claimed he spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie, who allegedly said the bullet absolutely should have gone through, that this caliber would take down a moose or elk, but Charlie's bone was so healthy and dense that his body stopped it.

This narrative can now be officially debunked. While it's true that Charlie's neck stopped the bullet without an exit wound, and a fragment was recovered, the weapon used was not a .30-06 rifle as claimed. The bullet entered from the front left lower side of his neck and a fragment was recovered near his spine, roughly in line with the shoulder blade. This trajectory and the lack of massive tissue destruction is inconsistent with a high-powered rifle round carrying 3,000 pounds of energy.

The Ballistic Evidence Tells a Different Story

The part Andrew Kolvet told the truth about is that Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. Multiple sources have verified that at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from Charlie's neck, specifically near the spine in line with the shoulder blade area. This gives investigators a clear bullet trajectory that raises serious questions about the official account.

If Charlie had been shot with a .30-06 rifle as claimed, his death certificate would have reflected that. In suicide situations and other gun deaths, when the gun and bullet are known, medical examiners include this information on the death certificate. Charlie Kirk's death certificate does not reflect a .30-06 bullet because they did not recover one. The wound pattern, lack of exit wound, and controlled damage are consistent with a smaller caliber weapon, not a high-powered rifle that would have gone through multiple necks.

Hunters and military experts were right to question the official story from the beginning. Common sense rules here. The physical evidence shows Charlie was shot with a completely different kind of gun, one where it would make sense that the bullet didn't cut through him, where an artery could explode from the front without his entire neck exploding.

Eyewitness Testimony and Media Manipulation

Throughout this investigation, certain witnesses have been amplified while others have been silenced. During the chaos at Utah Valley University, multiple people insisted they heard multiple shots. These individuals were not the ones awarded mainstream media interviews. One witness who tried to speak was physically pushed and shut down, in what appeared to be an effort by Turning Point staff or students to prevent him from sharing his account.

The witness who was pushed stated he was in the third row when a shot rang out. He looked to his left, then to his right, and saw Charlie slump over with blood coming from the left side of his neck. The interesting detail here is his instinctive reaction. If a high-powered rifle shot came from 250 yards behind him, common sense suggests he would look back first, not side to side. Your instinct would be to duck and look toward the source of danger coming from behind.

The person doing the pushing in that viral video is not Andrew Kolvet, who was not on the ground that day as he flew in after the shooting. The individual doing the pushing is not a Turning Point USA employee and not a UVU student. Despite shutting down a college kid from speaking, this person, whose name is Cooper Brown, appeared on Fox News that very night and again the next day to provide eyewitness testimony.

Cooper Brown and the Leadership Institute Connection

Cooper Brown identified himself as working for an organization called Leadership Institute, which works hand-in-hand with conservative coalition groups on college campuses. He was brought in as a volunteer and was given the responsibility of managing the microphone during the event, which he described as a fantastic opportunity to be up really close to witness the dialogue.

Several details about Cooper Brown raise questions. When attempts were made to reach him, a cousin provided contact information, but this cousin lives in Phoenix, Arizona. Investigation of Brown's background shows inconsistencies. According to his resume, he attended a small college in New Hampshire, but verification of these details proved difficult. A search found someone with that name who graduated in the year he claims, but it was a woman. The phone number provided traces to Phoenix, linking to someone who is 32 years old with the same last name.

Why would a volunteer, not a Turning Point USA student from UVU, be given the honor of holding the microphone at such an event? Turning Point USA chapters typically work hard to put these events on and decide who gets these positions. The decision to give this responsibility to an outside volunteer who then appeared multiple times on Fox News while actual UVU students were not given platforms raises legitimate questions.

Jason Chaffetz's Account of the Shooting

One eyewitness who could not be silenced was Jason Chaffetz, former politician and Fox News contributor from Utah, who attended the event and was in communication with Charlie beforehand. Of everyone who appeared in mainstream media that day, Chaffetz seemed genuinely shaken by the event. Unlike others whose vibes felt off, Chaffetz appeared authentically disturbed by what he witnessed.

Importantly, Chaffetz rebutted the idea that the shot came from far away. When asked about the shooting, he stated that being there and seeing it within proximity, it seemed like it was a close shot. He described the venue layout, noting a four-story administrative building to the south and other buildings where someone on the second level could watch Charlie. When pressed to give his assessment, Chaffetz indicated he believed the shot came from straight ahead in close proximity, not from a distant building.

Chaffetz has been honest about his background, with parents who worked in government and the FBI. His assessment that the shot was closer contradicts the official narrative of a distant shooter. This testimony from someone with government connections who seemed genuinely traumatized adds weight to the theory that the shooter was much closer, likely in the audience.

The Theory of Multiple Shooters

Given the ballistic evidence and witness testimonies, the working theory is that there were two people with weapons that day. One person had a rifle that was fired, possibly as a decoy to muffle the sound of a smaller gun. The actual fatal shot came from a person much closer to Charlie, likely in the audience and to his left.

This would explain why certain footage was immediately seized, particularly the camera behind Charlie's head. Of all the cameras present, why was that one grabbed first by law enforcement? Tyler Bowyer from Turning Point USA lied when he said the person who took the cameras down was instructed to do so by law enforcement. That simply did not happen. The selective seizure of this particular footage suggests they were creating a blind spot, particularly on Charlie's left side.

The theory that accidentally releasing the footage of Charlie's back ruined the federal narrative makes sense. The plan may have been to never let that footage see the light of day, claim they recovered a .30-06 bullet, and present a simple lone gunman scenario. But when the footage was released and people could see there was no exit wound and no blood on Charlie's white shirt until he fell out of frame, it created problems for their story. They panicked and tried to explain it away with the miracle bone density narrative.

The Caldera Engineering Mystery

From the very beginning, Caldera Engineering raised red flags. This company, connected to multiple witnesses who appeared in mainstream media, doesn't add up. People who have worked in the valve industry for 30 years and live nearby report never hearing of Caldera Engineering, which is unusual for a company that's supposedly been in business since 1997.

Investigation into the company revealed several oddities. The formation LLC documents from 1997 are not digitized, as Utah didn't start digitizing these records until the early 2000s. To get the original formation documents requires an in-person visit. What is accessible shows that in their early years, Caldera Engineering used a lawyer in Arizona for trademark purposes. This lawyer was the same one introduced by Tyler Bowyer at Turning Point USA, creating an unexpected connection between Utah and Phoenix.

Even more mysteriously, tips indicate that Caldera Engineering employs at least one professional actor with no background in engineering. This person went to school for theater, worked in theater and plays, yet appears on the company roster. Why would an engineering company hire someone with only theater experience? Additionally, there was a link to an Israeli individual listed as the founder of Caldera Engineering, though this has not been fully corroborated. The company's website mentions projects in Israel, but details about these projects remain unclear.

The Planes and Military Connections

Two planes have drawn attention in this investigation. The first, tail number N1098L, is a plane recognized as having military use. This plane left from Texas, flew over to Utah right around the time of Charlie's shooting, dipped very low, then returned. The plane is owned by Lassai Aviation LLC and was being contracted. The fact that a plane used by the military was in the area at the exact time of the shooting fits the pattern of a military operation.

The second plane belongs to Derek and Shelaine Maxfield, who sold a beauty company for billions and now run what's been characterized as a human trafficking operation in Utah. This plane traveled to Page, Arizona, where the ADSB transponder allegedly turned off. Kash Patel claims the plane never stopped transponding, while Derek Maxfield says on Instagram that the air traffic control center agreed they could stop transponding. These contradictory statements raise obvious questions.

Multiple pilots and people who work at airports have confirmed this plane was acting strangely that day. It was supposed to land at an FBO called Millionaire in Page, Arizona, but at the last second changed to land at Signature, a different FBO. When investigators tried to look into this, someone at the FBO first confirmed the plane made multiple trips in recent days, then later claimed the plane never landed there at all. Federal agents appear to be guarding information about this flight, which makes no sense unless there's something to hide.

The New Medical Examiner

Another person who warrants investigation is Dr. Dedra Weiss-Amaro, who became Utah's state medical examiner in May 2024. She came from Missouri and possibly also worked in California at some point. Given what we know about federal operations and historical precedents like the JFK shooting, having someone new in this critical position raises questions. The medical examiner's report and death certificate will be crucial in determining what really happened, yet we're being told to simply trust conclusions that don't match the physical evidence.

Memory Implantation and Witness Coaching

One investigator on the ground, Nick, reported something disturbing. He felt like federal agents were walking around after the shooting trying to implant memories into people's heads. He described people he didn't recognize approaching witnesses and repeatedly saying "you heard one shot, we heard one shot." While this might sound conspiratorial, it's a documented tactic in operations where controlling the narrative is essential.

Interestingly, the two women in black (incorrectly labeled as "goth girls") who appeared in Phil Lyman's footage said they heard two shots. They never made it to Fox News or any mainstream media platform. The witnesses who were given national platforms all seemed to support a particular narrative, while those whose accounts contradicted it were ignored or suppressed.

There's a remarkable absence of actual UVU students in the mainstream media coverage. Cooper Brown isn't a UVU student. The people featured prominently in interviews had connections to Caldera Engineering or other organizations. Why weren't Turning Point USA chapter members from UVU given platforms to share what they heard and saw?

The Josh Hammer Text Messages

Josh Hammer attempted to defend himself by releasing text messages between him and Charlie following their phone call. These messages only confirm the timeline and raise more questions. After the call, Charlie texted "Thank you for your help, guys!" with an exclamation point, a standard polite response. Josh Hammer replied, "Good luck at the campus visit start. Don't hesitate to let me know or any of us know how we can help. What's your first stop tomorrow, by the way?"

The strange part is that Josh Hammer claimed Charlie reached out to him for help strengthening his debate skills because Charlie loved Israel so much he wanted the best talking points to defend the state. Yet in these messages, Hammer doesn't even know where Charlie is debating the next day. If the call was specifically about prepping for tomorrow's debate, wouldn't the location have come up? The texts reveal nothing except that Josh Hammer's story doesn't hold together under scrutiny.

The Gaza "Peace Deal" and Ongoing Deception

While investigating Charlie's death, the world is being told to celebrate a peace agreement between Israel and Hamas. According to headlines, Israel will partially withdraw troops from Gaza and Hamas will release remaining hostages. This comes after 85% of Gaza has been destroyed in what appears to be a pre-planned controlled demolition.

Benjamin Netanyahu is on camera explicitly before October 7th saying they need to hit them so hard they can't come back. Jared Kushner, who will financially benefit from whatever gets built in Gaza's place, was at Harvard on February 15, 2024, discussing how Gaza's waterfront property could be very valuable if people would focus on building up livelihoods. He suggested Israel should do its best to move the people out and then clean it up.

Donald Trump wants a Nobel Peace Prize for what amounts to planned ethnic cleansing so they can profit on the land and turn it into a beach town. This is a holocaust happening in real time, and future generations need to know exactly who did it and whose families were involved. The land of Gaza belongs to the Palestinians, and those who profit from this atrocity will carry a curse.

What Happens Next

This investigation is far from over. The decentralized nature of this inquiry, with ballistics experts, military veterans, researchers, and citizens all contributing, means the truth will eventually emerge. The mistake made by those behind this operation was making it a public execution. In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok. They mostly read about it, and the feds could control the narrative more easily.

By having the world watch Charlie's shooting live, they traumatized people in a way that backfired. Instead of creating only fear and compliance, they created anger at the blatant corruption and the insulting assumption that everyone would simply accept the official story. This is the internet generation, with TikTokers asking questions, military guys analyzing ballistics, medium psychics offering insights, and every type of person contributing to uncovering the truth.

The investigation will continue during the upcoming break, with more pieces being put together and more explosive revelations promised. September 10th will not be forgotten. The memory of what happened to Charlie Kirk and the search for truth about who really killed him and why continues until real answers emerge.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!