Candace Owens Delivers Open Letter to President Trump on Loyalty, Legacy, and Charlie Kirk's Freedom

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Victor Davis Hanson Addresses the Anti-MAGA Right and Critics of Trump's Iran Strategy

Victor Davis Hanson Addresses the Anti-MAGA Right and Critics of Trump's Iran Strategy

10:37

Candace Owens and Ana Kasparian Unite Against Elite Control, War Propaganda, and Zionist Intimidation Tactics

Candace Owens and Ana Kasparian Unite Against Elite Control, War Propaganda, and Zionist Intimidation Tactics

1:25:29

Nick Freitas Analyzes Tucker Carlson's Trump Apology and the Growing Conservative Split Over Iran and Israel

Nick Freitas Analyzes Tucker Carlson's Trump Apology and the Growing Conservative Split Over Iran and Israel

41:21

Candace Owens Delivers Open Letter to President Trump on Loyalty, Legacy, and Charlie Kirk's Freedom

Candace Owens addresses President Trump directly in a powerful open letter examining loyalty, leadership, and the fragility of power. Drawing parallels between Gladiator films and modern politics, Owens dissects Trump's recent Truth Social post attacking Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones, and herself. She reflects on the late Charlie Kirk's ability to command crowds without seeking political seats, questions Trump's bizarre defense of Brigitte Macron, and challenges his loyalty to the MAGA base. Owens argues that Trump has traded respect for money, become enslaved to foreign interests, and lost the movement he once led. This is a pointed meditation on what makes leaders strong or weak, and who truly commands the crowd.

April 11, 2026

The Fragility of Empires and the Power of Commanding Crowds

Candace Owens opens her letter to President Trump with a meditation on what she finds most fascinating about Gladiator films. Beyond the actors and storylines, she is drawn to the incontrovertible truth they reveal about the fragility of empires. What collapses an empire? What makes an emperor weak or strong? More importantly, what makes a king or emperor feel threatened initially?

The setup is always the same: wealthy elites and politicians perched above a coliseum, watching slaves fight to their deaths for entertainment. Then comes the inevitable narrative flip when the elites and their scribes and senators perceive a threat. Owens knows exactly when this happens—it is when a slave begins to command the crowd. Every single time, without fail, that is when politicians begin to feel worried.

What particularly interests Owens about this moment is that the slaves never desire the seats of the politicians. They just want their most basic needs met. In most circumstances, they would happily serve some structure of governance forever if their basic needs could be met, but this has proven to be a historical impossibility. Inevitably, society arrives at the moment of political extravagance, the fabled "let them eat cake" moment. They just cannot stop. There can be absolutely no truth between a master and his slave for that reason. The nature of the relationship forbids it.

Charlie Kirk: The Maestro Who Died Free

Owens thinks about this dynamic often now, mostly in the context of their late mutual friend Charlie Kirk. She wonders when was the exact moment that Charlie Kirk understood he was not free—that he had money and fame, but he did not actually have freedom.

Between her and Trump, Owens admits that whoever made the decision to kill Kirk was correct in their assessment that he was indeed a threat. Charlie Kirk could command a crowd. He was capable of that. So much so that seven months after his death, the crowd still moves on his behalf. That is incredible. That is real power, Owens tells Trump, and he should ask himself how Kirk achieved it.

Owens offers that it is because Kirk never sat above perched looking down at the slaves. Charlie understood how movements were built and more crucially how they were sustained. Someone said to her shortly after his death that Charlie was a maestro. He understood that every instrument was needed to command an orchestra—the strings, the woodwind, the brass, the percussion. All very different sounds, but he could hear them each brilliantly. At various times he would conduct one sound above the other: more flute, less violin or cello. Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens—different instruments to be sure.

Only a fool or someone under the express direction of one could have thought to hit send on what Trump published on Truth Social, Owens asserts.

Dissecting Trump's Truth Social Attack

Owens reads Trump's post together with him. Trump wrote: "I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years. Especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the number one state sponsor of terror, to have a nuclear weapon. Because they have one thing in common, low IQs. They are stupid people. They know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too. Look at their past. Look at their record. They don't have what it takes and they never did. They've all been thrown off television, lost their shows, and aren't even invited on TV because nobody cares about them. They are nut jobs, troublemakers, and they will say anything necessary for some free and cheap publicity. Now they think they can get some clicks because they have third-rate podcasts, but nobody's talking about them. And their views are the opposite of MAGA or I wouldn't have won the presidential election in a landslide."

Owens asks Trump if he has any idea why his old tweets and insults worked back in 2015. She can help him—it is because they were rooted in some element of truth. When he called Rosie O'Donnell unattractive or said Hillary Clinton should be in prison, it played to the crowd because although many people thought it was inappropriate and beneath the dignity of a politician, it was based in truth.

But calling Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and Owens "low IQ" and unsuccessful? When Trump writes stuff like that, he just demonstrates nothing but his own irrationality. It just does not land. "Nobody cares about them anymore"? Trump is the leader of the free world and he is tweeting about them. That means somebody cares.

The Death of Cable News and the Rise of New Media

What nobody cares about anymore, and what Trump seems to have an inability to comprehend, is that traditional cable news no longer moves the needle. Cable TV is a dying medium. FDR used the radio—his voice, the fireside chats. It worked. It moved audiences when it was new. When the world transitioned to television, JFK's good looks on the screen served him.

Fast forward to today and the world is technologically advancing, yet Trump is launching insults at what he does not comprehend. Joe Rogan is not going to do Fox News hits. He is not trying to get on CNN. None of them are. Owens does not know how else to help Trump understand. He is quite literally mocking people because they comprehend something that he does not.

Tucker Carlson is more powerful than Trump. Deep down Owens thinks Trump knows that. She thinks he resents that. This is proven by his next lines.

The College Insult That Betrays the Base

Trump continued: "MAGA agrees with me and just gave CNN a 100% approval rating of Trump, not hand-flailing fools like Tucker Carlson who couldn't even finish college. He was a broken man when he got fired from Fox and he's never been the same. Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist."

Obviously Tucker Carlson is in his prime, and the whole world understands that. But the sentence "he couldn't even finish college"—is Trump aware that his base is comprised of blue-collar workers who never went to college, many who never so much wanted to go to college, never dreamed it? The farmers, the ranchers, the plumbers, the electricians, the people who work with their hands. Trump now sticks his nose up at all of those people.

Owens points out that Charlie Kirk did not go to college. Also, many of the men and women that Trump and Pete Hegseth want to send to their deaths in the Middle East did not go to college. Let her be perfectly clear: each and every one of them is infinitely more smart and more capable than Trump and the people he surrounds himself with in this moment.

The Bizarre Brigitte Macron Defense

Trump's post continued: "Or Megyn Kelly who nastily asked me the now famous only Rosie O'Donnell question or crazy Candace Owens who accuses the highly respected first lady of France of being a man when she is not and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me the first lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace. In fact, it's not even close."

Owens asks: Brigitte Macron? Who did Trump write that sentence for? Not even Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron applauded that sentence. Sometimes propaganda, when it is too naked, actually just hurts the cause it purports to support. Why is Trump obsessed with Brigitte? Does he think he can command people, men, straight men, to suddenly think that Brigitte is hot?

Owens provocatively asks: Did Trump date Jean-Michel Trogneux? Is he gay? Why is he so obsessed, calling her from the White House? Stop talking about Brigitte. Is it a physical attraction, truly, that he had there back when he was better looking? Did Trump sleep with him when he was a man?

To Trump's point about hoping Macron wins money—does he think his base cares when the subject matter is children being statutorily raped by their supervisors? Does Trump understand that no one in true MAGA cares about money above truth and protecting children? Did he connect that dot when they revolted against him saying "What about the Epstein files?" That seems to be a theme with him: protecting people who harm children. Why does he keep doing that? Why does he want people to be sued for standing up to that class?

The Alex Jones Attack and Trump's Money Obsession

Trump's message continued: "Or bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things and lost his entire fortune as he should have for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming that it was a hoax. These so-called pundits are losers and they always will be. Now, fake news CNN"—who Trump just cited as saying he has 100% support, so are they fake or are they real?—"the failing New York Times, and all of the other radical left news organizations are hailing them and giving them positive press for the first time in their lives. They are not MAGA, they are losers just trying to latch onto MAGA."

It is all about money for Trump, Owens observes.

The Incoherent Conclusion

Trump concluded: "As President I could get them on my side anytime I want, but when they call I don't return their calls because I'm too busy on world and country affairs. And after a few times they go nasty, just like Marjorie Traitor Brown, but I no longer care about that stuff. I only care about doing what's right for our country. MAGA is about winning and strength in not allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons. MAGA is about making America great again and these people have no idea how to do that, but I do because the United States is now the hottest country anywhere in the world. President Donald J. Trump."

Owens asks: Was that written by Mark Levin when he was six? Or who put this message together? The hottest country in the world because they are bombing kids for no reason? Because they just killed 150 schoolgirls for no reason? Because Trump's administration lied about six servicemen who died, and they had to leak that to CBS News that he was lying about what was happening?

Is that what makes America hot? Is hot girl summer being led by Brigitte Macron and people who attack other journalists for telling the truth? What is going on? Who put this message together and hit send? Trump is citing CNN, but also dissing CNN. He just told them they could not get on CNN, but now he is saying they have good coverage on CNN. He is all over the place. It seems like he cannot put together a coherent thought.

The Rules of Loyalty and Leadership

Owens tells Trump something that is just reality—going back to the rules of the jungle. Let all the politicians and advisers around him evaporate for just a moment. Just the two of them. Ready?

People will not fight beside, behind, or for someone who is fundamentally disloyal. If disloyalty and deceit is in his nature, then Owens highly suggests that Trump combine it with silence. He can be what he is, but she advises he do it quietly. Because MAGA is no longer commanded by him and he knows it.

Trump belongs to the Epstein class. That is his legacy now. People will see his name on buildings—whatever was agreed upon in those boardrooms with Jared Kushner, Trump Gaza hotel, whatever he tweeted so crassly. He will see that. He will earn that. And then when they see it, they will think about how many children had to die or be raped by men on islands so that Trump could stick his name upon a building.

For clarity, that is not Owens's fault. That is not Megyn Kelly's fault. That is not Tucker Carlson's fault. Trump made that trade. He chose money above respect. And what an absolute shame that he chose to do that toward the end of his life, because he cannot take money and things and stuff with him when he goes. Just his soul. And he sold his for what? Another gilded ballroom?

Charlie Kirk Died Free, Trump Will Die a Slave

Let Owens be perfectly clear when she says this: Charlie Kirk died free. Trump will most certainly die a slave. He is in chains right now and the entire world can see that perfectly.

At best, what Trump can hope for in this moment is that maybe one day upon the college campuses that he so deeply cherishes, they will teach all about his now tarnished legacy as the perfect modern-day example of Plato's allegory of the cave. He is familiar with that one? The prisoner chained in a cave. Multiple prisoners chained in a cave with a fire burning behind them, mistaking shadows on the wall for reality. When one of those prisoners escapes and makes it outside of the cave and into true daylight and sees reality and returns to try to tell the other prisoners that there is truth and reality outside, they fight that person. They do not believe it. They call that person crazy.

That is Trump. He is chained inside of a cave right now. Who is making those shadows on the wall? At best, the annals of history will relegate him to a philosophical discussion: the madness of President Trump. People will ask who made Trump believe the shadows on the wall were real. The professor will chide the class and in essays students will cite the example of the man who was once considered a leader of a movement suddenly reduced to sitting on the side in the situation room at the White House while the leader of a foreign country, Benjamin Netanyahu, stands above him convincing him that Iran represents an imminent threat which can be crippled within weeks.

The students in that class will be mystified. It will be such a compelling examination. Good discussion. Bibi is Trump's master. Maybe it is Miriam Adelson that lights the fire and Bibi that makes the shadows on the wall, but the entire world recognizes that now.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!