Up Next
Victor Davis Hanson Addresses the Anti-MAGA Right and Critics of Trump's Iran Strategy
10:37
Candace Owens and Ana Kasparian Unite Against Elite Control, War Propaganda, and Zionist Intimidation Tactics
1:25:29
Nick Freitas Analyzes Tucker Carlson's Trump Apology and the Growing Conservative Split Over Iran and Israel
41:21
Candace Owens Delivers Open Letter to President Trump on Loyalty, Legacy, and Charlie Kirk's Freedom
Candace Owens addresses President Trump directly in a powerful open letter examining loyalty, leadership, and the fragility of power. Drawing parallels between Gladiator films and modern politics, Owens dissects Trump's recent Truth Social post attacking Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones, and herself. She reflects on the late Charlie Kirk's ability to command crowds without seeking political seats, questions Trump's bizarre defense of Brigitte Macron, and challenges his loyalty to the MAGA base. Owens argues that Trump has traded respect for money, become enslaved to foreign interests, and lost the movement he once led. This is a pointed meditation on what makes leaders strong or weak, and who truly commands the crowd.
The Fragility of Empires and the Power of Commanding Crowds
Candace Owens opens her letter to President Trump with a meditation on what she finds most fascinating about Gladiator films. Beyond the actors and storylines, she is drawn to the incontrovertible truth they reveal about the fragility of empires. What collapses an empire? What makes an emperor weak or strong? More importantly, what makes a king or emperor feel threatened initially?
The setup is always the same: wealthy elites and politicians perched above a coliseum, watching slaves fight to their deaths for entertainment. Then comes the inevitable narrative flip when the elites and their scribes and senators perceive a threat. Owens knows exactly when this happens—it is when a slave begins to command the crowd. Every single time, without fail, that is when politicians begin to feel worried.
What particularly interests Owens about this moment is that the slaves never desire the seats of the politicians. They just want their most basic needs met. In most circumstances, they would happily serve some structure of governance forever if their basic needs could be met, but this has proven to be a historical impossibility. Inevitably, society arrives at the moment of political extravagance, the fabled "let them eat cake" moment. They just cannot stop. There can be absolutely no truth between a master and his slave for that reason. The nature of the relationship forbids it.
Charlie Kirk: The Maestro Who Died Free
Owens thinks about this dynamic often now, mostly in the context of their late mutual friend Charlie Kirk. She wonders when was the exact moment that Charlie Kirk understood he was not free—that he had money and fame, but he did not actually have freedom.
Between her and Trump, Owens admits that whoever made the decision to kill Kirk was correct in their assessment that he was indeed a threat. Charlie Kirk could command a crowd. He was capable of that. So much so that seven months after his death, the crowd still moves on his behalf. That is incredible. That is real power, Owens tells Trump, and he should ask himself how Kirk achieved it.
Owens offers that it is because Kirk never sat above perched looking down at the slaves. Charlie understood how movements were built and more crucially how they were sustained. Someone said to her shortly after his death that Charlie was a maestro. He understood that every instrument was needed to command an orchestra—the strings, the woodwind, the brass, the percussion. All very different sounds, but he could hear them each brilliantly. At various times he would conduct one sound above the other: more flute, less violin or cello. Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens—different instruments to be sure.
Only a fool or someone under the express direction of one could have thought to hit send on what Trump published on Truth Social, Owens asserts.
Dissecting Trump's Truth Social Attack
Owens reads Trump's post together with him. Trump wrote: "I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years. Especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the number one state sponsor of terror, to have a nuclear weapon. Because they have one thing in common, low IQs. They are stupid people. They know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too. Look at their past. Look at their record. They don't have what it takes and they never did. They've all been thrown off television, lost their shows, and aren't even invited on TV because nobody cares about them. They are nut jobs, troublemakers, and they will say anything necessary for some free and cheap publicity. Now they think they can get some clicks because they have third-rate podcasts, but nobody's talking about them. And their views are the opposite of MAGA or I wouldn't have won the presidential election in a landslide."
Owens asks Trump if he has any idea why his old tweets and insults worked back in 2015. She can help him—it is because they were rooted in some element of truth. When he called Rosie O'Donnell unattractive or said Hillary Clinton should be in prison, it played to the crowd because although many people thought it was inappropriate and beneath the dignity of a politician, it was based in truth.
But calling Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and Owens "low IQ" and unsuccessful? When Trump writes stuff like that, he just demonstrates nothing but his own irrationality. It just does not land. "Nobody cares about them anymore"? Trump is the leader of the free world and he is tweeting about them. That means somebody cares.
The Death of Cable News and the Rise of New Media
What nobody cares about anymore, and what Trump seems to have an inability to comprehend, is that traditional cable news no longer moves the needle. Cable TV is a dying medium. FDR used the radio—his voice, the fireside chats. It worked. It moved audiences when it was new. When the world transitioned to television, JFK's good looks on the screen served him.
Fast forward to today and the world is technologically advancing, yet Trump is launching insults at what he does not comprehend. Joe Rogan is not going to do Fox News hits. He is not trying to get on CNN. None of them are. Owens does not know how else to help Trump understand. He is quite literally mocking people because they comprehend something that he does not.
Tucker Carlson is more powerful than Trump. Deep down Owens thinks Trump knows that. She thinks he resents that. This is proven by his next lines.
The College Insult That Betrays the Base
Trump continued: "MAGA agrees with me and just gave CNN a 100% approval rating of Trump, not hand-flailing fools like Tucker Carlson who couldn't even finish college. He was a broken man when he got fired from Fox and he's never been the same. Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist."
Obviously Tucker Carlson is in his prime, and the whole world understands that. But the sentence "he couldn't even finish college"—is Trump aware that his base is comprised of blue-collar workers who never went to college, many who never so much wanted to go to college, never dreamed it? The farmers, the ranchers, the plumbers, the electricians, the people who work with their hands. Trump now sticks his nose up at all of those people.
Owens points out that Charlie Kirk did not go to college. Also, many of the men and women that Trump and Pete Hegseth want to send to their deaths in the Middle East did not go to college. Let her be perfectly clear: each and every one of them is infinitely more smart and more capable than Trump and the people he surrounds himself with in this moment.
The Bizarre Brigitte Macron Defense
Trump's post continued: "Or Megyn Kelly who nastily asked me the now famous only Rosie O'Donnell question or crazy Candace Owens who accuses the highly respected first lady of France of being a man when she is not and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me the first lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace. In fact, it's not even close."
Owens asks: Brigitte Macron? Who did Trump write that sentence for? Not even Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron applauded that sentence. Sometimes propaganda, when it is too naked, actually just hurts the cause it purports to support. Why is Trump obsessed with Brigitte? Does he think he can command people, men, straight men, to suddenly think that Brigitte is hot?
Owens provocatively asks: Did Trump date Jean-Michel Trogneux? Is he gay? Why is he so obsessed, calling her from the White House? Stop talking about Brigitte. Is it a physical attraction, truly, that he had there back when he was better looking? Did Trump sleep with him when he was a man?
To Trump's point about hoping Macron wins money—does he think his base cares when the subject matter is children being statutorily raped by their supervisors? Does Trump understand that no one in true MAGA cares about money above truth and protecting children? Did he connect that dot when they revolted against him saying "What about the Epstein files?" That seems to be a theme with him: protecting people who harm children. Why does he keep doing that? Why does he want people to be sued for standing up to that class?
The Alex Jones Attack and Trump's Money Obsession
Trump's message continued: "Or bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things and lost his entire fortune as he should have for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming that it was a hoax. These so-called pundits are losers and they always will be. Now, fake news CNN"—who Trump just cited as saying he has 100% support, so are they fake or are they real?—"the failing New York Times, and all of the other radical left news organizations are hailing them and giving them positive press for the first time in their lives. They are not MAGA, they are losers just trying to latch onto MAGA."
It is all about money for Trump, Owens observes.
The Incoherent Conclusion
Trump concluded: "As President I could get them on my side anytime I want, but when they call I don't return their calls because I'm too busy on world and country affairs. And after a few times they go nasty, just like Marjorie Traitor Brown, but I no longer care about that stuff. I only care about doing what's right for our country. MAGA is about winning and strength in not allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons. MAGA is about making America great again and these people have no idea how to do that, but I do because the United States is now the hottest country anywhere in the world. President Donald J. Trump."
Owens asks: Was that written by Mark Levin when he was six? Or who put this message together? The hottest country in the world because they are bombing kids for no reason? Because they just killed 150 schoolgirls for no reason? Because Trump's administration lied about six servicemen who died, and they had to leak that to CBS News that he was lying about what was happening?
Is that what makes America hot? Is hot girl summer being led by Brigitte Macron and people who attack other journalists for telling the truth? What is going on? Who put this message together and hit send? Trump is citing CNN, but also dissing CNN. He just told them they could not get on CNN, but now he is saying they have good coverage on CNN. He is all over the place. It seems like he cannot put together a coherent thought.
The Rules of Loyalty and Leadership
Owens tells Trump something that is just reality—going back to the rules of the jungle. Let all the politicians and advisers around him evaporate for just a moment. Just the two of them. Ready?
People will not fight beside, behind, or for someone who is fundamentally disloyal. If disloyalty and deceit is in his nature, then Owens highly suggests that Trump combine it with silence. He can be what he is, but she advises he do it quietly. Because MAGA is no longer commanded by him and he knows it.
Trump belongs to the Epstein class. That is his legacy now. People will see his name on buildings—whatever was agreed upon in those boardrooms with Jared Kushner, Trump Gaza hotel, whatever he tweeted so crassly. He will see that. He will earn that. And then when they see it, they will think about how many children had to die or be raped by men on islands so that Trump could stick his name upon a building.
For clarity, that is not Owens's fault. That is not Megyn Kelly's fault. That is not Tucker Carlson's fault. Trump made that trade. He chose money above respect. And what an absolute shame that he chose to do that toward the end of his life, because he cannot take money and things and stuff with him when he goes. Just his soul. And he sold his for what? Another gilded ballroom?
Charlie Kirk Died Free, Trump Will Die a Slave
Let Owens be perfectly clear when she says this: Charlie Kirk died free. Trump will most certainly die a slave. He is in chains right now and the entire world can see that perfectly.
At best, what Trump can hope for in this moment is that maybe one day upon the college campuses that he so deeply cherishes, they will teach all about his now tarnished legacy as the perfect modern-day example of Plato's allegory of the cave. He is familiar with that one? The prisoner chained in a cave. Multiple prisoners chained in a cave with a fire burning behind them, mistaking shadows on the wall for reality. When one of those prisoners escapes and makes it outside of the cave and into true daylight and sees reality and returns to try to tell the other prisoners that there is truth and reality outside, they fight that person. They do not believe it. They call that person crazy.
That is Trump. He is chained inside of a cave right now. Who is making those shadows on the wall? At best, the annals of history will relegate him to a philosophical discussion: the madness of President Trump. People will ask who made Trump believe the shadows on the wall were real. The professor will chide the class and in essays students will cite the example of the man who was once considered a leader of a movement suddenly reduced to sitting on the side in the situation room at the White House while the leader of a foreign country, Benjamin Netanyahu, stands above him convincing him that Iran represents an imminent threat which can be crippled within weeks.
The students in that class will be mystified. It will be such a compelling examination. Good discussion. Bibi is Trump's master. Maybe it is Miriam Adelson that lights the fire and Bibi that makes the shadows on the wall, but the entire world recognizes that now.
Video Transcript
Did you date Jean Michel Trogneux? Are
you gay? Why are you so obsessed calling
me from the White House? Stop talking
about Brigitte.
Is it a physical attraction truly that
you had there? Dear Mr. President Trump,
I've always been a fan of Gladiator
movies. I have watched them all
countless times. Everybody who watch
watches this podcast knows that. And
when I consider what it is that I am so
drawn to, like is it the actors? Is it
the storyline? Yeah, in part, of course.
Who could deny like the performance of
Russell Crowe in the first film?
But above all of that, the characters,
the scripts, there sits this sort of
incontrovertible truth that I am
absolutely fascinated by.
Which is the fragility of empires.
Right? What is it ultimately that
collapses an empire? What makes an
emperor
weak
or an emperor strong?
I think more to the heart of the matter,
the question is what is it that makes a
king or an emperor feel threatened
initially? Right?
The setup of every movie is always the
same. You have the wealthy elites, the
politicians perched above a coliseum,
slaves fighting to their deaths beneath
all for their distinct entertainment,
obviously. And then comes the inevitable
narrative flip. Suddenly the elites and
their scribes and the senators, they
perceive a threat.
And when does that happen? That's
actually not a rhetorical question, Mr.
President. I know the answer. It is when
a slave
begins to command the crowd.
Every single time, without fail.
That's when the politicians begin to
feel worried. And what is of particular
interest to me about that moment is that
the slaves on their end, they never
desire the seats of the politicians.
Right? They just want to have their most
basic needs met. In most circumstances,
they happily would serve some sort of
structure of governance forever if their
basic needs could be met, but it's
proven to be a historical impossibility,
right? Inevitably we arrive at the
moment of political extravagance, the
fabled let them eat cake moment. They
just can't stop, right?
There can be absolutely no truth between
a master and his slave for that reason.
The nature of the relationship forbids
it. And I think about this a lot now,
very often. Mostly in the context of our
late mutual friend Charlie Kirk.
I think to myself,
when was the exact moment that Charlie
Kirk understood that he was not free?
That he had money and that he had fame,
but he did not actually have freedom.
You know, between you and I,
um
whoever it was that made the decision to
kill him was correct in their assessment
that he was indeed a threat. Because
Charlie Kirk could command a crowd. He
could. He was capable of that.
So much so so much so that he actually
um if you think about it, he's been dead
for 7 months and the crowd still moves
on his behalf. That's incredible. That
is real power, Mr. Trump. You should ask
yourself, how did he achieve it?
I would offer it it's because he never
sat above perched looking down at the
slaves, right? Charlie understood how
movements were built and more crucially
how they were sustained.
Someone actually said to me shortly
after his death that Charlie was a
maestro. He understood that every
instrument was needed to command an
orchestra. The strings, the woodwind,
the brass, the percussion, all very
different sounds, but he could hear them
each brilliantly, each section.
And at various times he would conduct
one sound above the other, more flute,
less violin,
or cello.
Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly,
Candace Owens, different instruments to
be sure.
But uh
only a fool or someone under the express
direction of one could have thought to
hit send
on what you published on Truth Social
last night. And I think that we should
read it together, Mr. President. Shall
we? Okay. Here's what you wrote. You
wrote,
"I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly,
Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all
been fighting me for years. Especially
by the fact that they think it is
wonderful for Iran, the number one state
sponsor of terror, to have a nuclear
weapon.
Because they have one thing in common,
low IQs. They are stupid people. They
know it, their families know it, and
everyone else knows it, too.
Look at their past. Look at their
record. They don't have what it takes
and they never did. They've all been
thrown off television, lost their shows,
and aren't even invited on TV because
nobody cares about them. They are nut
jobs, troublemakers,
and they will say anything necessary for
some free and cheap publicity.
Now they think they can get some clicks
because they have third-rate podcasts,
but nobody's talking about them. And
their views are the opposite of MAGA or
I wouldn't have won the presidential
election in a landslide. Okay, let's
let's park it there, right? Let's just
chew on that portion right there first
because it is a stunning break from
reality. Cuz I I'll ask the question, uh
do you have any idea why it was, Mr.
President, that uh your old tweets,
the sentences you used to say, which
were typically
definitely insults back in 2015, but do
you ever wonder why they worked?
I can help you, right? It's because they
were rooted in some element of truth.
Okay? So, if you called Rosie O'Donnell
unattractive or when you said Hillary
Clinton should be in prison, it played
to the crowd because although many
people thought it was inappropriate and
beneath the dignity of a politician,
it was based in truth, right? Hillary
Clinton's done some things.
Now, you can call Megyn Kelly a great
many things. I have definitely had my
political disagreements with her over
the years.
Low IQ?
Really? Tucker Carlson low IQ, me low
IQ, the three of us unsuccessful
somehow? When you write stuff like that,
you just demonstrate nothing but your
own irrationality. It just doesn't land.
Nobody cares about them anymore. Really?
You're the leader of the free world and
you're tweeting about us.
I think that means somebody cares.
Actually, what nobody cares about
anymore and what you seem to have an
inability to comprehend
is
that traditional cable news no longer
moves the needle.
Cable TV is a dying medium. FDR, he used
the radio, right? His voice, the
fireside chats. It worked. It moved
audiences when it was new.
And and when the world transitioned,
there and then suddenly it was the dawn
of television. JFK's good looks on the
screen, that served him. And he used
that.
Once again, fast forward to today and
the world is technologically advancing.
Yet you're launching insults at what you
don't comprehend. Joe Rogan is not going
to do Fox News hits. Do you understand
this? He is not trying to get on CNN.
None of us are. I don't know how else to
help you understand. You are quite
literally mocking people because they
comprehend something that you don't.
Tucker Carlson is more powerful than
you. Deep down I think you know that. I
think you resent that.
Which is proven by your next lines.
Let's let's read on.
You continue, "MAGA agrees with me and
just gave CNN a 100%
approval rating of Trump,
not hand-flailing fools like Tucker
Carlson who couldn't even finish
college. He was a broken man when he got
fired from Fox and he's never been the
same. Perhaps he should see a good
psychiatrist." Okay.
Obviously Tucker Carlson is in his
prime. The whole world understands that.
That sentence, he couldn't even finish
college.
Are you aware that your base is
comprised of blue-collar workers who
never went to college, many who never so
much wanted just wanted to go to
college, never dreamed it?
The farmers, the ranchers, the plumbers,
the electricians, the people who work
with their hands, you now
stick your nose up to to all of those
people?
Do you know who else didn't go to
college? Um Charlie Kirk didn't go to
college.
Uh also uh those men, many, I would say,
a lot of the men and women that you and
Pete Hegseth want to send to their
deaths in the Middle East, many of them,
probably most of them, didn't go to
college.
And let me be perfectly clear here when
I say that each and every one of them
is infinitely more smart and more
capable than you and the people that you
surround yourself with in this moment.
But let's continue.
Cuz CNN says you got 100% support.
You write, "Or Megyn Kelly who nastily
asked me the now famous only Rosie
O'Donnell question or crazy Candace
Owens who accuses the highly respected
first lady of France of being a man when
she is not and will hopefully win lots
of money in the ongoing lawsuit."
Actually, to me the first lady of France
is a far more beautiful woman than
Candace. In fact, it's not even close.
This Brigitte Macron?
Who Who did you write that sentence for?
Not even Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel
Macron applauded that sentence, okay?
They said, "Incroyable." It doesn't
help. It sometimes propaganda, when it's
too naked, actually just hurts the cause
that it purports to support. Why are you
What is your obsession with with
Brigitte? This Brigitte Macron in the
swimsuit, you think that you can command
people, men, straight men to suddenly
think that Brigitte is hot?
Did you date Jean-Michel Trogneux? Are
you gay? Why are you so obsessed calling
me from the White House? Stop talking
about Brigitte.
Is it a physical attraction, truly, that
you had there
back when he was better looking, I
suppose? Did you sleep with him when he
was a man? Do you think people care?
To your point about I hope she wins
money since it's all you see, gold,
shekels. Do you think your base cares
when the subject matter is children that
are being statutorily raped by their
supervisors?
Do you understand that no one in MAGA,
in true MAGA, cares about money above
truth and protecting children?
Did you connect that dot
when we revolted against you saying,
"What about the Epstein files?" That
seems to be a theme with you.
Protecting people who harm children. Why
do you keep doing that?
Why do you want people to be sued for
standing up to that class?
We continue. Let's go back to your your
message conclusively, right?
Or bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of
the dumbest things and lost his entire
fortune as he should have. It's all
about money for you, Trump, isn't it?
For his horrendous attack on the
families of the Sandy Hook shooting
victims, ridiculously claiming that it
was a hoax. These so-called pundits are
losers and they always will be.
Now, fake news CNN
uh who you literally you you just cited
as saying you have 100% support. So, are
they fake or are they real, Trump?
Now, the fake news CNN, the failing New
York Times, and all of the other radical
left news organizations are hailing them
and giving them positive press for the
first time in their lives. They are not
MAGA, they are losers. Just trying to
latch onto MAGA. As president President
I could get them on my side anytime I
want, but when they call I don't return
their calls because I'm too busy on
world and country affairs. And after a
few times they go nasty, just like
Marjorie Traitor Brown, but I no longer
care about that stuff. I only care about
doing what's right for our country. MAGA
is about winning and strength in not
allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons.
MAGA is about making America great again
and these people have no idea how to do
that, but I do because the United States
is now the hottest country anywhere in
the world.
President Donald J. Trump. Well, was
that written by Mark Levin?
Like when he was six? Or who who put
this message together? The hottest
country in the world because we're
bombing kids for no reason? Because we
just killed 150 schoolgirls for no
reason? Because uh you guys just lied
about six of our servicemen who died?
And they they had to leak that to CBS
News that you were lying about what was
happening in the Is that what makes us
hot?
Is is hot girl summer being led by
Brigitte Macron?
And people who attack people other
journalists for telling the truth?
Is like it What's going on? Who put this
message together for you and hit send?
You're citing CNN, but you're also
dissing CNN for having produced certain
polls. I don't know. You just told us
that we couldn't get on CNN, but now
you're saying that we have good coverage
on CNN. You're all over the place. It
seems like you can't put together a
coherent thought.
Let me tell you something and and this
is just reality, okay? Going back to
just the rules of the jungle, okay? Let
let all the politicians and advisers
around you evaporate for just a moment.
Just you and me, ready?
People will not fight beside, behind, or
for someone who is fundamentally
disloyal.
Okay? If disloyalty and deceit is in
your nature, then I highly suggest that
you combine it with silence.
You can be what you are,
but I would advise you do it quietly,
Trump.
Because MAGA is no longer commanded by
you and you know it. You know it. You
belong to the Epstein class. That is
your legacy now.
People will see your name on buildings,
whatever was agreed upon in those
boardrooms with Jared Kushner,
uh Trump Gaza hotel, whatever you
tweeted so crass. You will see that. You
will earn that.
And then when they see it, they will
think about how many children had to die
or be raped by men on islands so that
you could stick the Trump name upon a
building.
And for clarity,
Mr. President, that's not my fault.
That's not Megyn Kelly's fault. That's
not Tucker Carlson's fault. You made
that trade.
You chose money above respect. And what
an absolute shame that you chose to do
that toward the end of your life, okay?
Because
you can't take money and things and
stuff with you when you go. Just your
soul.
And you sold yours for what? Another
gilded ballroom?
Let me be perfectly clear when I say
this, Charlie Kirk,
he died free.
You will most certainly die a slave,
okay? You are in chains right now and
the entire world can see that perfectly.
At best, what you can hope for in this
moment is that maybe maybe one day upon
the college campuses that you so deeply
cherish, they'll teach all about your
now tarnished legacy as the perfect
modern-day example of Plato's allegory
of the cave. You're familiar with that
one? The prisoner chained in a cave.
Multiple prisoners chained in a cave
with a fire burning behind them,
mistaking shadows on the wall for
reality.
And when one of those prisoners escapes
and makes it outside of the cave and
into true daylight and sees a way that's
not reality and they return and they try
to tell the other prisoners,
"No no, there's there's truth and
there's actually reality outside."
They fight that person. They're They're
They're They don't believe it. They call
that person crazy. That's you. You are
chained inside of a cave right now. And
um
who's making those shadows on the wall,
right?
At best, the the annals of history,
I think within them you will be
relegated to a philosophical discussion,
the madness of President Trump. People
will ask, "Who made Mr. Trump believe
the shadows on the wall were real?"
The professor will chide the class and
in in essays students will cite the
example
of the
man who was once considered a leader of
a movement suddenly reduced
to sitting on the side
in the situation room at the White House
while the leader of a foreign country,
Benjamin Netanyahu,
stands above him convincing him that
Iran represents an imminent threat which
can be crippled within weeks.
Yeah, the students in that class will be
mystified. It will be such a compelling
examination. Good discussion.
Bibi is your master.
Maybe it's Miriam Adelson that lights
the fire and Bibi that makes the shadows
on the wall,
but the entire world recognizes that
now.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.