Candace Owens Exposes 45-Year-Old Woman Behind 4,040 Obsessive Tweets and Dangerous Group Chat Targeting Her Family
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Candace Owens Exposes Jeremy Boreing and Daily Wire's Campaign to Destroy Her Family Through Husband George Farmer
1:08:59
Candace Owens Exposes New Evidence in Charlie Kirk Investigation and Challenges Turning Point USA
49:35
Candace Owens Exposes Brian Harpole's Emergency Room Fantasy and The DailyWire+'s Financial Collapse
1:00:43
Candace Owens Exposes 45-Year-Old Woman Behind 4,040 Obsessive Tweets and Dangerous Group Chat Targeting Her Family
Candace Owens reveals the disturbing identity behind the anonymous account 'No Soup For Noels', a 45-year-old woman named Britta Widener who sent over 4,040 tweets about Owens in just 11 months. This obsessive behavior is part of a larger pattern involving a 92-member group chat originally called 'Protect Erika Kirk' that has escalated from online criticism to potentially dangerous stalking, including attempts to locate Owens' home and gather information about her family. Owens draws parallels to a previous case where similar online radicalization led to an assassination plot against Charlie Kirk, resulting in a prison sentence for the perpetrator. The situation has become serious enough that former group members are contacting Owens' team, warning that someone could get hurt.
Candace Owens has exposed the identity of a woman she describes as making "Laura Loomer look stable"—45-year-old Britta Widener, who operated under the anonymous Twitter account 'No Soup For Noels.' Widener's obsessive behavior included sending 4,040 tweets about Owens in just 11 months following Charlie Kirk's assassination, compared to Owens' 104 tweets about Erika Kirk during the same period.
Widener, described by Owens as a "childless cat woman," was recently arrested for DUI and has been part of a coordinated effort to target Owens and her family. Her connection to the DailyWire+'s "super fan community" allegedly gave her increased access and emboldened her behavior.
The 92-Member Group Chat Turned Dangerous
The obsessive behavior extends beyond individual accounts to a coordinated group effort. Owens detailed a 92-member group chat originally called "Protect Erika Kirk" that began as a forum to debunk things Owens was saying but evolved into something far more sinister.
According to Owens, the group's activities escalated to include:
Attempting to discover where Owens lives
Investigating whether Owens and her husband had divorced
Sharing information about her children
Circulating photos of her kitchen
Spreading false claims about Owens hiring "eight nannies"
One former member of the group contacted Owens to apologize, explaining that what started as a healing process during recovery became toxic. This individual warned that the group's behavior had become dangerous and that someone could get hurt.
Owens referenced a previous incident involving a similar group chat that escalated to an actual assassination plot. A man named Him Braverman, who was part of a 26-member Jewish group chat, became radicalized through the online community and began plotting Charlie Kirk's assassination.
The FBI intervened, and Braverman was arrested, pled guilty, and is currently in prison. Owens noted that mainstream media largely ignored this story, despite its significance as a case of online radicalization leading to terrorist plotting.
The pattern is concerning: online groups that begin as simple fan communities or opposition forums can become echo chambers where mentally unstable individuals become radicalized. While some members participate casually, others make the group their entire life, leading to potentially dangerous outcomes.
DailyWire+ Connection and Corporate Involvement
Owens revealed that Widener's obsession appears connected to her time as a DailyWire+ "super fan." According to Owens, the DailyWire+'s then-CEO flew super fans out to meet podcasters, which she believes intensified their parasocial relationships with the company's personalities.
Owens initially assumed accounts like 'No Soup For Noels' belonged to young people with underdeveloped brains, comparing the phenomenon to Taylor Swift's fan base. She was shocked to discover that Widener is 45 years old and exhibiting this level of obsessive behavior.
The situation became more complex when Owens learned that top executives at a "conservative corporation" are involved in the group chat, suggesting the coordinated harassment may have institutional backing or at least institutional participation.
Legal Action and Ongoing Investigation
Owens announced that her team will be filing legal action related to the group's activities. The severity of the situation escalated when former members began contacting Owens' tips line with information about other participants.
The investigation is ongoing, with Owens promising this is "a beginning not an end." She stated her team will continue monitoring the "Protecting Mrs. Erika Kirk" group chat and taking appropriate action.
Owens suggested that Widener "probably should check into rehab and stop letting homosexual men direct her actions," implying there may be others orchestrating the harassment campaign.
The Psychology of Online Radicalization
The case illustrates how online communities can serve as incubators for radicalization. What begins as information sharing and casual participation can evolve into obsession for mentally unstable individuals.
Owens noted that group chats create environments where:
Participants validate each other's increasingly extreme beliefs
Information sharing escalates to stalking behavior
Obsession becomes normalized within the echo chamber
Boundaries between legitimate criticism and harassment dissolve
The volume of Widener's activity—4,040 tweets in 11 months about a single person—demonstrates a level of fixation that goes far beyond normal political disagreement or criticism. This represents approximately 12 tweets per day, every day, for nearly a year, focused entirely on one individual.
Warning Signs and Future Developments
Former group members reaching out to warn that "someone could get hurt" echoes the pattern that preceded the Him Braverman case. The escalation from online criticism to information gathering about family members, residences, and personal details follows a trajectory that security experts recognize as potentially dangerous.
Owens emphasized that while people are "allowed to watch a show and debunk" what she says, the behavior crossed into territory that law enforcement and the legal system must address. The involvement of corporate executives in the group chat suggests potential professional and legal consequences for those participants as well.
The story continues to develop as more information about group members emerges through tips and investigation.