Candace Owens Exposes Pentagon Press Pass to Laura Loomer and UVU Event Timeline Inconsistencies

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination After Erika Kirk's Powerful Forgiveness Speech and Kash Patel Statement

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination After Erika Kirk's Powerful Forgiveness Speech and Kash Patel Statement

1:00:21

Candace Owens Uncovers Shocking Details Behind Charlie Kirk Assassination and Turning Point USA Cover-Up

Candace Owens Uncovers Shocking Details Behind Charlie Kirk Assassination and Turning Point USA Cover-Up

56:19

Candace Owens Reveals Twelve Israeli Cell Phones Detected at Charlie Kirk Assassination Site

Candace Owens Reveals Twelve Israeli Cell Phones Detected at Charlie Kirk Assassination Site

51:06

Candace Owens Exposes Pentagon Press Pass to Laura Loomer and UVU Event Timeline Inconsistencies

Candace Owens examines troubling inconsistencies in the timeline of Charlie Kirk's UVU campus event and questions why it was approved so rapidly compared to typical Turning Point USA planning procedures. She reveals email evidence showing campus tours are normally planned six months in advance, yet the UVU request came in mid-July and was scheduled for September. Owens also addresses the Zohran Mamdani mayoral victory in New York City, Brett Cooper being labeled the newest target of cancel culture for defending free speech, and raises concerns about Laura Loomer receiving Pentagon press credentials despite documented psychiatric issues. Throughout, she challenges the establishment narrative on both sides and calls for transparency regarding unanswered questions.

November 5, 2025

The Zohran Mamdani Victory and Republican Establishment Denial

Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoral race, and the Republican establishment is scrambling with excuses. They're blaming everything from conservative infighting to claims that jihadists have taken over the country. The real answer is simpler: the establishment, both left and right, is in complete denial about the populist movement taking hold across America.

In other news, Brett Cooper has apparently become the newest person to be accused of being "literally Hitler" for saying something totally sensible. It would be helpful to get iPhone alerts for these designations, like Amber Alerts, just to keep track of who's being accused of committing a Holocaust each day for speaking common sense.

Troubling Timeline Inconsistencies With the UVU Event

The timeline surrounding the UVU event is absolutely absurd. Turning Point USA allegedly received a request from UVU for Charlie Kirk to speak on their campus in mid-July, just weeks before his death. They immediately approved that request and scheduled it as his first tour stop some six weeks later. This has never happened in the history of campus tours.

Campus events require months of advance planning. To illustrate this point, email evidence shows that for campus events that took place in April 2024, planning began in October 2023. An email from October 2023 detailed pending room requests for University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, University of Pittsburgh, and University of Alabama for events scheduled for late March and early April. The standard procedure involves receiving requests in the spring that couldn't be accommodated, then revisiting those campuses the following semester in the fall.

The mid-July request with immediate approval for a September event is completely atypical. Charlie Kirk traveled constantly with a packed schedule. He wasn't someone who could randomly add events on short notice. This rapid approval screams inside job.

Additional Strange Planning Details

Another completely atypical detail: Charlie was scheduled to speak in Utah on September 10th and then return just 10 days later to a different campus in Utah that's under two hours away. That's not how Turning Point plans events. The standard practice is if you're already flying to a region, you do campus events back-to-back in that corridor. You do a sweep overnight over two days, hitting UCLA, Berkeley, and Stanford consecutively. You don't fly to Utah, return home to Arizona, then fly back to Utah 10 days later. Nothing makes sense.

The Apparent Plan and Hostile Takeover

This is looking like the apparent plan was to assassinate Charlie Kirk, who had at long last faltered on the pro-Israel cause—his words, not anyone else's—and then stage a hostile takeover of his brand and legacy. Part of this involved pretending his best friends were people like Susie Wiles, who somehow made it onto the stage to eulogize him at the very public memorial event.

The event was so publicized that the implicit message became clear: your job around the world is now to support this administration and its efforts because this event has been turned into an effective Trump rally. Then Pastor Rob McCoy told Americans that Charlie Kirk kept notebooks and diaries where he diligently wrote down his succession plan, featuring who he wanted to take over the organization in the event of his untimely death.

The implication is absurd: Charlie, a boy genius and bright kid, would have formalized a succession plan outside of a diary. He would have called one of his many lawyers and formalized it in a will, which is what you're supposed to do when planning for unexpected death. But instead, we're told he wanted to put it in notebooks that we're never allowed to read, but we're supposed to accept that they definitely read them and that they contain adjectives like "fantastic" and "heroic" to describe Mikey McCoy.

Strange Behavior at the Scene

Charlie was never rendered any first aid immediately at the scene. The security team is supposed to administer first aid immediately, but that's not visible from any angle. When he's down on the ground, they don't put gauze on him or even put a hand where the wound is to try to stop the bleeding. When they pick him up, he's flopping all the way to the car. His neck isn't being held in a manner to stop the wound from opening up.

Something really striking: Charlie was never actually put on the ground after he fell from the chair. The back footage and side footage show that the security guard grabs Charlie and guides him behind the table, but he places him on top of an equipment suitcase. About 30 seconds pass, and at no point do they take him off this box and put him flat on the ground. His head is flopped over. He is not level the entire time as they're huddled over him.

It's very strange that those equipment boxes are even there on either side of him. As far back as anyone could look, this sort of setup wasn't visible in earlier footage. Everything is weird that day. The question is whether that box was moved before camera operators came to remove cameras, because only about four minutes pass. That equipment box doesn't appear to be there in the aftermath.

In common sense scenarios, even without being paid millions of dollars annually to secure a venue, you would know that you have to get a body flat to administer any sort of aid and assess the situation. For about 30 seconds down there, it's unclear what they're doing. They're huddled up but not securing the wound, not trying to get his head level, not even opening their bag to administer aid despite being paid millions of dollars per year to do exactly that.

Mikey McCoy's Instant Phone Call

Mikey McCoy's instant phone call is strange, and there are definite lies about the fact that he's covering his ears. More footage shows he never stops the motion of holding a phone to his ear for a single second, even when he gets way beyond the immediate area and starts going left toward a parking lot. When he's finally out of view, he never once puts the phone down.

Blake Neff, who was there and is now carrying on Charlie Kirk's show, was quite fired up about people asking questions about what Mikey was doing. He explained that when the shooting occurred, he was next to Mikey. Both heard a loud crack, turned, and saw Charlie had been shot. Both realized there was a shooter on the scene. Their reaction was to get out of there before they were both shot. Blake insists this wasn't abandoning Charlie because Charlie had a security team that leapt into action.

Blake says he ran past the SUV they came in, thinking briefly about getting in the car but deciding against it. He doesn't remember being with Mikey immediately as they left. After running for no more than 15 or 20 seconds, he realized there hadn't been another shot, so the shooter had likely been detained. He paused, looked around, and saw Mikey. Blake will never forget what he saw because Mikey is usually a very bubbly, happy guy, but in that moment he was profoundly freaked out with his lip quivering. Mikey said he needed to call Erika, took out his phone, and began calling her.

Blake says this happened within a minute of the shooting. He pulled out his own phone to call his mom to say there had been a shooting and he was okay. Around the same time, Mikey immediately called his dad, Rob McCoy, saying someone shot Charlie and they needed all pastor friends to pray right now. After that call, Mikey got total mastery of himself and stepped up like a general directing a battle, grabbing people and organizing who needed to get to the hospital.

Problems With Blake Neff's Account

Here's what's wrong with that account: First, based on further footage of Mikey walking, there's no way he was covering his ears. He doesn't dial and keeps the phone positioned the same way all the way past Charlie's car, straight past it, all the way to the left, never bringing the phone down. He's not covering his ears for that long. It doesn't make sense.

Blake might think he's telling the truth, but it's not a true account of what happened that day. It's possible Blake is not lying, but it is not a true account. Mikey looks like he knows where he's going, straight in the general direction of the parking lot and then to the left. He's already on the phone, and Blake Neff is nowhere to be seen in the tracked movements.

We're told that within one minute of Charlie getting shot, Mikey called both Erika and Rob McCoy. That's one of those little things that's really problematic. The implication is that the call with Erika had to be fast. Imagine getting a phone call saying the person you love most in the world, the person you're married to, has been shot. How fast are you getting off that phone? You're staying on, asking questions. There's a series of questions that need answers: What do you mean? What are you talking about? Where is he? Where do I go? Is he okay?

If what Blake is saying is true, and until they reunited—which doesn't happen in our eyesight, we don't see Blake and Mikey reunite when tracking Mikey all the way straight down to the left—that 12:23 timeline has to be over by the time Blake sees his lip quiver, by the time he says he has to call Erika. Was this a 15-second phone call? "Hey, Charlie's been shot. Got to call you back later because I have to call my dad and ask him to pray." That doesn't make sense.

There are so many things that would happen before calling your dad to ask him to pray if you're really going to snap into action. One of his first phone calls wasn't just two calls—he made three because he also called Elizabeth McCoy, his wife, who screamed at the office. We're not being told the truth. Was his phone call to Erika only 10 seconds? Did he drop that news and keep moving, or was he already on the phone with Rob McCoy? Clarification is needed because every day that goes on, it feels like Turning Point is engaged in a cover-up.

Demanding Transparency

Turning Point needs to answer questions: Why was this event confirmed so quickly when it was requested so late? The way Mikey moves looks like he knows where he's going, like they know where they're going to meet. Blake Neff says elsewhere they got to the hospital within 25 minutes, which means they knew instantly where the hospital was and which direction to go. The communication was flowing. Frank said he was on the phone while in the car with family members. All of this happened instantly.

The hospital was put on lockdown when Charlie came in, but they let Mikey and the Turning Point team in. Obviously, they were there when staff came out and said Charlie had died, according to Blake Neff and Frank Turek's testimony. But a lot of little details don't make sense.

We're being told that transparency would somehow hurt the case. If transparency would hurt the case, then there is no case. If phone logs from that day would somehow hurt the case, we're being asked to be idiots. They're lying about the phone calls, lying about the timing of the phone calls. The phone calls don't make sense.

Positioning Mikey as the New Charlie

The feeling that they were positioning Mikey to be the new Charlie is reinforced by another fact. After Charlie died, there were no new scheduled posts on his YouTube page. They didn't bring back his YouTube channel and start scheduling posts until after the memorial event, which makes sense—all hands would be on deck for the memorial. When they came back and began scheduling posts on Charlie's channel, the first post they scheduled was Mikey McCoy's speech with a picture of Mikey McCoy and his wife.

Of all the speeches they could have picked to put first—JD Vance, Trump, or even Erika's speech, which was second—they put Mikey McCoy and his wife. This stinks to high heaven.

Zohran Mamdani Wins Despite Billionaire Opposition

Despite all the pressure to focus on other topics, Zohran Mamdani won pretty handily against Andrew Cuomo. Just five minutes ago, the Republican party was telling us Cuomo was unbelievably corrupt and should be in prison. Suddenly, it became our duty to get the word out to vote for Cuomo against Zohran Mamdani.

Bill Ackman almost personally ran against Zohran Mamdani, at times demanding to have a debate with him, which makes no sense if he's not running against him. Zohran Mamdani won irrespective of the money donated against him. Bill Ackman gave $1.75 million. Michael Bloomberg gave $8.3 million to a Cuomo-affiliated super PAC to stop Zohran Mamdani. Airbnb co-founder Joseph Gebbia gave $3.1 million. The Tisch family gave $1.2 million. Still, Zohran Mamdani won.

He probably won during the first mayoral debate, just like Trump kind of won the first Republican debate in 2016 by saying the establishment could go to hell. During the New York mayoral debate, candidates were asked which foreign country they would visit first if they won. The question makes no sense on its face, but the answers were revealing. Multiple candidates immediately said Israel, with one saying he'd make his fourth trip to Israel followed by his fifth trip to Ukraine. Zohran Mamdani said he would stay in New York City to focus on New Yorkers across the five boroughs.

When pressed on whether he would visit Israel as mayor, Zohran Mamdani said he'd be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers by meeting them wherever they are—in their synagogues, temples, homes, or at subway platforms—because ultimately they need to focus on delivering on their concerns. When asked directly if he believes in a Jewish state of Israel, he said Israel has the right to exist as a state with equal rights. The moderators and other candidates attacked him for not saying Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state and for saying he wouldn't visit Israel.

This is our country. Candidates competed over who loves Israel more. During presidential debates, the majority wore Israeli flag pins—only Vivek Ramaswamy didn't. Why are politicians running for president of the United States wearing the Israeli flag as a pin? No one can answer these questions.

What Zohran Mamdani's Win Says About Jewish Voters

Zohran Mamdani won, and New York has the largest population of Jewish people of any city in the world outside Israel. That says something. He didn't get the majority of the Jewish vote, but exit polls are stunning. He got 32% of the Jewish vote, which is pretty remarkable for someone allegedly so anti-Israel. Even deeper in the data, Israel was a factor in many voters' decisions according to a CNN exit poll of about 4,700 people. But ultimately, this is an election for mayor of New York, which has nothing to do with Israel.

This speaks to what Norm Finkelstein explained when he appeared on the show: even among the Jewish community, the Israel question is here and it's not going away. The bigger question is why didn't MAGA do what the establishment wanted? Even Donald Trump dedicated significantly more Truth Social posts to ensuring Zohran Mamdani would lose than to ensuring Charlie Kirk's murderer was found. President Trump didn't send even one message about investigating Charlie's murder, yet he pushed hard against Zohran Mamdani. Why didn't MAGA listen even to Trump?

The answer is obvious: we don't recognize this MAGA. Dana Lash wants to know how we're going to win if we don't use our platforms to encourage people to vote her way. But if MAGA now includes people like Josh Hammer who were never Trump supporters, then MAGA is not MAGA. MAGA needs a new leader. It's obvious that the establishment recognizes we've never been on the same team. If they think they're going to infiltrate and convince us this is the same party while gaslighting us about everything happening, they've lost the party.

MAGA got fractured not when Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes, but when Donald Trump looked us in the face and said "Epstein, who?" That's when it was game over. Israel-first is a cancer cell to everything and everyone that wants to play around with it, whether left or right. It's a radical psychosis that has manifested within both parties.

Brett Cooper Attacked for Defending Free Speech

This radical ideology is so extreme that they started attacking Brett Cooper. She's 23 years old, bubbly, and makes the majority of her videos about pop culture. She covers mainstream politics but nothing too daring and never talks about Israel. She did her part as Zionists wanted by encouraging New Yorkers to vote against Zohran Mamdani. But it's not enough because this is a radical ideology. You can give them 100%, say one critique, and they don't want to break bread with you—they want to destroy you.

Brett Cooper watched the totally deranged Tucker-is-not-MAGA Republican Jewish Coalition event and agreed with most sensible people that demands to censor speech and deplatform people is not only childish but ineffective and antithetical to what it means to be a conservative. She called out Randy Fine, a representative from Florida who bragged about not washing his hands after shaking hands with Netanyahu and has repeatedly introduced bills to criminalize anti-semitism, infringing upon free speech. She said he obviously cares more about Israel than principles like free speech, and her advice was that he should just move to Israel. Considering he had to go through anger management classes a few years ago, she genuinely thinks he would probably be happier if he just moved to Israel.

That's sound advice. Rather than trying to make this country Israel, why not just go live in Israel? She also addressed Ted Cruz, pointing out his hypocrisy. Just a month before, Cruz tweeted: "They don't kill you because you're a Nazi. They call you a Nazi so they can kill you. Political violence is a left-wing phenomenon. Enough is enough. We need to shut it down." Then in response to Fuentes and Tucker, he tweeted: "Trump's bombing of the Ayatollah's nuclear facilities made the little Nazi mad. Good."

Brett pointed out that Cruz turned around and called somebody he doesn't like a Nazi out of blind rage because he's so angry that the conservative base's attitudes are rapidly changing and Nick Fuentes is getting national attention. In response, Cruz has compromised his own values in anger, setting a dangerous precedent. Unfortunately for that crowd, attitudes are changing, which is why they're incredibly frantic.

How They Responded to Brett Cooper

The good response would have been to listen, to break bread, to reach out and invite her onto a show to talk about it and hear voices. Charlie Kirk did exactly this—he sat down with Gen Z trying to tell them they're pushing an entire generation away with their actions. But we know how they responded to Charlie Kirk doing that. They started calling him an anti-semite, squeezing him up until the last moments of his life, making financial threats that weren't just threats—people like Bob Showman took $2 million away from him because he let Tucker Carlson hit the stage.

They've learned nothing. Rather than reaching across to Gen Z or Brett Cooper, they're already calling her the "white Candace Owens." Aaron Wexler tweeted: "Okay, white Candace. What is a Nazi then?" How does that make sense? Why are you calling Brett Cooper the white Candace? Why do you keep seeing this recurring theme of certain commentators constantly having to comment on white people? Why does she have to be the "white Candace"? That's ridiculous. We don't even have the same ideas. She's saying something sensible.

It gets worse. Ted Cruz tried to big-time her, which looks very loserish when directed at a 23-year-old. He tweeted: "I don't know who this angry lady is, but she's missing a key distinction. Fuentes calls himself a Nazi. He has said that Hitler is very cool and Hitler was right and he is on team Hitler. If you explicitly side with and advocate for Hitler, you are an actual effing Nazi."

First, class it up—we don't need F-bombs dropped at a 23-year-old. Second, trying to big-time her and act like you don't know who she is when you've done various things with the Daily Wire, including being featured in Lady Ballers, a movie Brett Cooper starred in, and you're good friends with Michael Knowles. You know fully well who Brett Cooper is. What does she have to do, run for president and not win to be recognized on a global scale? This does nothing to bring people over to their cause.

The Spiritual Evil of Their Attacks

There's a current of sheer evil that Zionism goes hand-in-hand with. They began pouring through all of Brett's old content looking for ways to go after her character. They came across a clip of her speaking to Shawn Ryan last year. Before providing context, understanding how spiritually evil and possessed these people are helps process what happened.

Tweets went up saying essentially she's a witch. Real tweets: "What a surprise. Brett Cooper and her mom engage in witchcraft. She's not a conservative." Another: "Brett Cooper, the most recent hero of the woke right, is a secular, nominally religious spiritualist. Her views are inherently un-Christian, but that doesn't matter to the woke right as long as she agrees with or permits their hatred of Jews."

Here's the context they're twisting: Brett was telling one of the most compelling and moving conversations about her backstory. She lived through a lot. She had twin brothers, and one dropped dead from a heart attack unexpectedly. She describes the dynamics of what they went through as a family—having an identical twin brother die suddenly, what that does to the surviving twin who has to walk by the mirror every day and see his brother, but his brother is actually dead. Her surviving brother went through severe mental health struggles. He's in a mental hospital, and she takes care of him.

She was talking about the grieving process they went through, what her mother went through. Her mother went and visited mediums. May you never know the pain of losing a child. It's something unimaginable, the pain of losing a child and how it ripped through her family. She effectively lost a second brother because of having lost the first brother, trying to come to terms with the fact that her family would never be the same again, how it led to divorce—all of these things. And they're saying she's a witch because her mother went to visit a medium. That's it. Case closed.

What is wrong with these people? The Israel-first movement is a true cancer that just wants to destroy. There is so much hate. They are growing increasingly dangerous because they are radical at their hearts. These are the descendants of Bolsheviks. This is not something just to laugh at—it's something to pay attention to. If they're going after Brett Cooper in this demonic way, someone who's just a bubbly girl who speaks mostly about pop culture, trying to dig up content to say she's a witch and suggesting we burn her at the stake, then where does that put the rest of us?

Pentagon Gives Laura Loomer Press Pass

Their rhetoric is getting dangerous. They're saying another 9/11 is coming. Pay very close attention because all the wrong people—the pro-Israel crowd—are signaling hard that another 9/11 is coming. They're jacking up the jihad rhetoric. Everyone's a jihadist. Muslims are coming, Muslims are here, Zohran Mamdani is a jihadist threat. Something big is coming.

The Pentagon, where the Department of Defense is housed and which was implicated in 9/11 with many questions about what they were up to regarding money and other issues, has just given press passes to Laura Loomer, putting her in their press corps. Conservative activist Laura Loomer, a Trump ally, says she has a new Pentagon press pass.

This should be of interest to everybody. You don't have to be a Laura Loomer hater or lover to know that Laura Loomer has psychiatric issues. She has been on multiple psych 5150 holds. She's the person who chained herself to Twitter headquarters when she got banned and wore a Star of David. Crazier than chaining herself to Twitter and wearing a Star of David while trying to correlate being banned from Twitter with being in a Holocaust is the fact that Laura Loomer is not Jewish. She's living in a delusion that she's Jewish. She can't produce any Bat Mitzvah pictures because it never happened. She became Jewish, in essence, for political reasons and has gone so far in this identity crisis that she chained herself to Twitter headquarters and made it a Jewish thing when they kicked her off in 2018.

For whatever reason, the Department of Defense is signaling that she's an okay person to be in the building. That seems like maybe a flight risk. If you're interested in basic safety and defense, you wouldn't allow that person in a building like the Pentagon specifically. They're doing that because she has proven over and over again that she has no soul and will lie repeatedly about people, places, and things she sees with her own eyes as long as she defends the state of Israel, which has absolutely nothing to do with her ethnicity.

Josh Hammer Signals Another 9/11

On top of that, Josh Hammer, who looks like a bond villain, is similarly signaling along with many others that there's going to be another 9/11. The pro-Israel crowd would know a little something about that. Josh Hammer said: "New York City, for the time being, it looks like you're pretty screwed. It looks like you are literally going to have a Karl Marx-quoting, Hamas-loving Red-Green Alliance sicko. Yes, he is an absolute sicko. You're going to have this guy as the next mayor. A quarter century, just under a quarter century after 9/11, after the largest Islamic mass terrorist attack in global history, certainly in American history. Find me another single casualty event that killed that many people as were tragically killed on September 11th, 2001, a day that as a native suburban New Yorker I remember all too well. Less than a quarter century later, they are going to have a Muslim mayor, and not merely a Muslim mayor, but a Muslim mayor who has refused repeatedly to utterly condemn things such as 'globalize the intifada,' who injected his unique far-left noxious brand of Middle East politics into a municipal election for various identitarian identity politics reasons."

Who are you more afraid of as an American: Muslims or Zionists? Personally, Zionists are more concerning because whenever they get on this thing where they start talking about war, whenever they start itching for a war, when they want regime change in Iran, something happens and suddenly our boys are being sent. The best guard against this is to refuse to fight in the war that's being foreshadowed. Refuse on principle because our administration has been infiltrated and there are extremely evil people at the helm of the United States military who are not caring at all about American lives. They're not taking a stance for the freedoms people in the past fought for. This administration isn't even fighting for free speech on college campuses anymore.

It's a turnaround, a 180 from the Trump that came down the escalator. This is not the MAGA movement, and the reason that's clear is because all the never-Trumpers are praising it. If Trump joined the never-Trump party, then good on him, but the call is not to follow him there.

Final Thoughts on Transparency and Truth

Everything they are telling us is crazy. Every day brings something new that doesn't make sense. When you go through Turning Point USA experiences, every little micro-change sends alarm bells. It's a personal thing based on knowing how Turning Point operates their events, things the world doesn't know.

We are in a time of tremendous revelation. Times of tremendous revelation are times when evil becomes more desperate. Charlie's murder was because evil became very desperate. The problem with what they did is they planned it perfectly, and you should never have perfect behavior if a situation is organic. They planned it perfectly, so the phone call and walking away is not what a natural person would do, knowing what direction to walk. You'd be all over the place, freaking out, screaming, running toward the person. It looks like a military operation. Everything that day looks like a military operation.

That's the problem: computers never account for human behavior. Human behavior is lacking in this circumstance, and that's what makes everyone uncomfortable. They want us to forget this, to be ADHD about it, to move on and start talking about the Zohran Mamdani race. We have to be committed to not letting this go because we are getting close every day. We are going to increase the pressure on them.

If this happened to anyone else, Charlie would be doing the exact same thing. This is a kind of evil that should scare everyone because the implications are that if this was a military assassination, then there is a kind of evil so far-reaching that even Charlie's own allies at his company and possibly at the White House—not all of them, but some—would have had to be aware for this to be executed. We sense that in the lack of information coming out, the lies being told, the covering up of information like the 12 Israeli cell phones. If it really was nothing, then it would be nothing. They would share that information.

Kash Patel is frantic, angry, and shouting at people, according to reports. Let's keep on it. If this was an inside job, if there was a plan to stage a hostile takeover, we need answers. Why did this event get approval so quickly? We need to get to the bottom of why that is.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!