Candace Owens Fires Back at Her Critics: The Smear Campaign Is Collapsing in Real Time

[00:01] Can you believe

[00:03] the absolute

[00:05] unleashed,

[00:07] unchained, unvarnished

[00:10] hatred

[00:12] fixation

[00:14] on Candace Owens

[00:16] and stories that

[00:20] I mean, Mitch Snow,

[00:23] is this really the end of the world?

[00:27] She can say anything and

[00:31] the amount of people who jump on her

[00:35] but not with just a disagreement but

[00:38] with a ferocity

[00:41] an absolute focused almost a deepseated

[00:45] hatred. It's a pathology.

[00:48] No, I'm serious. This is this is this is

[00:51] nuts. There are people who never say

[00:54] anything about anything going on in the

[00:58] world about war and destruction and and

[01:01] death and mayhem and the violation of

[01:05] civil rights and the annihilation of

[01:08] people and nothing. Nothing.

[01:12] What they're doing to children with

[01:14] nothing.

[01:16] War and carnage and pestilence. NO. BUT

[01:19] CANDACE OWENS, it's almost it's it's

[01:22] weird. It's like a scrum. It's like a

[01:24] kabuki dance. And other people who don't

[01:28] even know why they're getting upset,

[01:30] they're jumping into it. What is the

[01:33] matter? Take it easy. Perspective. Dear

[01:37] God,

[01:39] I I can't believe this. She must be

[01:42] every day saying to herself, "What is

[01:45] going on [laughter] here?"

[01:47] It it's almost like um like watching a

[01:50] murmmoration like locust like a a swarm

[01:56] and a clockray a mob mentality.

[02:00] They want Candace Owens gone.

[02:04] I mean gone. Experated. Not not debated,

[02:08] not corrected, not proven wrong. Just

[02:12] gone.

[02:14] And the reason is simple. She refuses to

[02:17] shut up when people tell her to. And in

[02:21] media and politics, that is the one

[02:23] unforgivable sin. The reaction to

[02:27] Candice right now is not normal

[02:29] disagreement.

[02:31] It's fixation,

[02:34] obsession,

[02:36] and an escalation that has nothing to do

[02:40] with calmly sorting facts. I was

[02:43] watching last night the

[02:46] spaces or

[02:48] and during the course of this I'm

[02:49] listening to this I'm thinking what am I

[02:51] listening to

[02:54] they they didn't even debate the Kennedy

[02:56] assassination like this was it Watuka

[02:59] was it this wasn't Mitch Snow how do you

[03:01] know this was a Green Beret maybe he was

[03:03] maybe what is go

[03:06] it's it might be

[03:09] you know I'm expecting somebody all of a

[03:11] sudden say all right Stop. Enough's

[03:12] enough. Jokes's on you. We're kidding.

[03:15] We're a theater company. We're part of a

[03:17] weird kind of a Mgrim experiment

[03:19] wannabe. We wanted to see if we could

[03:21] create false momentum. Come on, Alex.

[03:24] Everybody, come on out. Hey, come on.

[03:26] We're all kidding. Hey,

[03:28] and I'm not going to say anything about

[03:30] Alex Jones. All right. I'm sorry. He's a

[03:34] friend of mine. I love the guy. Whatever

[03:37] he wants to do. He's a grown man. God

[03:40] bless him.

[03:42] All right. So, Alex, I'm your buddy and

[03:44] I'm not a fair weather friend and I

[03:46] don't jump sides. I'm not talking about

[03:48] you, my friend. All right. I'm not

[03:50] talking about you. I mean that

[03:53] I sometimes there are people may maybe I

[03:55] don't understand it. Maybe maybe I maybe

[03:57] I'm missing the point. But I do notice

[03:59] something. When people start calling

[04:01] somebody a CIA agent,

[04:04] MI6

[04:06] Mossad,

[04:08] I'll tell you what, if Candace Owens and

[04:10] Mossad, they're [laughter] they're

[04:12] really good. I mean, her Do you listen

[04:16] to what she's saying? Maybe that's it.

[04:20] Maybe that's it. Maybe it's counter

[04:22] counter counter intelligence. Maybe

[04:25] she's an FBI operative. Maybe she's a

[04:26] Democratic SCOP. maybe maybe some

[04:30] globalist handler all at once. This this

[04:33] this amalgamation

[04:36] of different positions and the argument

[04:39] has already collapsed. That that's not

[04:42] analysis. That's some kind of panic

[04:45] dressed up as certainty and fantasy.

[04:48] But I but I love it. So let let's let's

[04:52] slow this down. All right. And let's say

[04:53] it plainly. All right.

[04:57] Candace H Owens is bigger than she has

[05:00] ever been.

[05:04] And what exactly with all due respect to

[05:06] to co what is she saying

[05:12] other than while I talked to

[05:16] Mitch and why

[05:20] her audience is huge as we say in Hell's

[05:23] Kitchen. Her reach is real. She doesn't

[05:26] need approval from conservative

[05:29] gatekeepers. They don't know what to do.

[05:31] A lot of these cable news folks are

[05:33] looking at her and they're saying, "What

[05:34] do we do? What what what do we do? What

[05:37] what is this? How do we get a piece of

[05:40] this? How do we I don't even know."

[05:43] Media figures, political organizations,

[05:45] they're they're wondering, "How do we

[05:47] jump in on this in order just to

[05:48] survive?" And that alone, by the way,

[05:50] explains why the response to her has

[05:51] become so so aggressive, so offthe-wall.

[05:56] People don't react this way to voices

[06:00] that they can ignore. They react this

[06:02] way

[06:03] to voices they can't control. See,

[06:07] that's the thing. It drives them crazy

[06:11] that she won't listen to them. They're

[06:14] telling her, "Shut up." up and she's

[06:16] saying no.

[06:21] By the way, she did say something the

[06:22] other day which was which music to my

[06:24] ears and as a retired Catholic but

[06:26] somebody who who knows who knows how the

[06:29] club works. You mentioned holy days of

[06:32] obligation and that is exactly what a

[06:34] Catholic does. Good for you. I love

[06:37] these cafeteria Catholic. I'm a

[06:38] Catholic. I don't I don't go I don't do

[06:40] anything. There's there's rules. Good

[06:42] for you. Now, what Candace is doing, by

[06:46] the way, is also asking questions about

[06:47] a serious event. Remember that one?

[06:50] Remember that one? The whole

[06:51] assassination thing. And refusing to

[06:52] move on just because powerful people

[06:55] want the story closed.

[06:57] And whether she's right or wrong is not

[07:00] even the main issue anymore. By the way,

[07:03] you know that chat GPT

[07:05] I I put it something. It it it wouldn't

[07:07] allow it. It was arguing with me whether

[07:10] Charlie Kirk's homicide was an

[07:12] assassination because we don't know if

[07:13] it was basically targeted because of a

[07:15] political reason or not. I mean Chad GPT

[07:22] I'm arguing with what the hell am I

[07:23] arguing with? What is this thing? I'm

[07:25] saying are you kidding? And it says no

[07:27] I'm not kidding

[07:29] there. It's even,

[07:31] [cough and clears throat]

[07:32] excuse me, even even chat GPT

[07:36] and others are fighting this Charlie

[07:39] narrative. Get away from it.

[07:43] Th this is interesting. You know, the

[07:44] issue in all this is that Candace is

[07:47] still talking and she's still pointing

[07:49] at timelines and she's still asking why

[07:51] certain dates are avoided and why

[07:54] certain explanations feel incomplete.

[07:59] That makes people uncomfortable

[08:02] and that makes them feel uneasy. Not

[08:04] because it proves anything, but because

[08:08] but because it keeps attention where

[08:10] they want silence.

[08:12] And here's the thing, and I want you to

[08:14] understand something. And Erica, we're

[08:16] going to talk about her at some

[08:18] particular point later cuz I've been

[08:19] wanting to stay away from this cuz I I

[08:21] don't want to sound like I'm mean, but

[08:23] everybody is not turning on her, but

[08:25] people are saying this is the weirdest.

[08:28] I didn't know her before. I really

[08:30] wasn't paying attention.

[08:32] But she is Well, we'll talk about this

[08:36] behavior. Okay. Okay. We'll talk about

[08:38] this behavior.

[08:44] It's

[08:46] Doesn't anybody care about who killed

[08:47] Charlie? Is it Am I Did I miss something

[08:51] here? See th this is why the attacks

[08:54] the attacks on on Candace whatever keep

[08:56] on changing. First she was just wrong.

[08:58] Remember that she was wrong. She was

[08:59] wrong. Then she was biased and then she

[09:02] was anti-Semitic. Oh yeah. When you

[09:05] don't know what to say, anti-Semitic

[09:08] works like a charm. just like racist,

[09:11] transphobe, islamophobe,

[09:14] uh you know, homophobe,

[09:16] any kind anything to or or or just plain

[09:19] crazy. Remember, if you don't know what

[09:21] to do, she's just crazy. She's crazy.

[09:24] Not their husband or her that that

[09:26] British guy in my six. You better

[09:28] believe it, boy. I don't know if he's

[09:30] he's involved in I know he's doing

[09:31] something's wrong with that. Anyway, and

[09:35] Russell Bran, what's that all about?

[09:38] Russell Brand's got enough problems as

[09:39] it is. In any event, anyh who,

[09:43] so when I mean where? So, let me see.

[09:45] Let me go back to it. She was Oh, yeah.

[09:48] Wrong, biased, anti-Semitic, crazy,

[09:52] unstable,

[09:53] wrong, and now she's an agent for every

[09:57] intelligence service anyone can name.

[10:00] Um,

[10:02] FBI, CIA, MI6, MI5, Scotland Yard,

[10:05] Mossad, Pick One, CIA, AAA,

[10:09] uh, uh, CVS, uh, customer service group.

[10:15] I mean, name it. Pick all of them. The

[10:19] more ridiculous the better. Something's

[10:21] got to stick. See, once someone becomes

[10:24] everything at once,

[10:26] they're no longer a person that you have

[10:29] to engage. I mean, theoretically, that's

[10:31] the idea. They they become almost like a

[10:33] cartoon, a cartoon villain, a snidly

[10:37] whiplash that you can dismiss. Well,

[10:39] it's not working very well. And you

[10:42] know, there's a certain corner of the

[10:44] internet where that loves this phase.

[10:47] Oh, and you know it and I know it. They

[10:49] thrive on it. Everyone is a fed.

[10:53] Everyone is an asset. I know. I've

[10:56] studied this.

[10:58] I understand the symbolism, the

[10:59] symbology, the semiotics. I know this. I

[11:03] know she's a Oh, she's Langley. Oh,

[11:06] she's a spook. Oh, yeah. She's a She's a

[11:08] She's a spy. She's a She's from Yeah.

[11:11] Yeah. Yeah. That's it. Right. She's a

[11:13] She's an agent. And that husband of her,

[11:15] she's a plant. It's an arranged a

[11:18] marriage. That's it. That's the ticket.

[11:22] Everybody's an asset.

[11:25] Someone disagrees with you, Mossad. By

[11:27] the way, Mossad, they love Mossad. Deep

[11:30] down inside, I'm telling you, everybody

[11:32] is everybody. Laura Loomer, Mossad. Ben

[11:37] Shapiro, Mossad, except Mossad. And Mo

[11:42] Mossad is like

[11:44] is like Woodstock. Somebody said one

[11:46] time if everybody who says they were at

[11:50] Woodstock,

[11:52] if everybody if if if they who said they

[11:54] were at Woodstock were at Woodstock, uh

[11:56] 20 million people would have been at

[11:58] Woodstock.

[11:59] And if Mossad was as big as they say, it

[12:02] would be it would basically take over

[12:05] Tel Aviv.

[12:08] And it's so interesting because this is

[12:10] by design.

[12:12] There is a commercialization of the

[12:15] image of this. Don't forget Aman, by the

[12:16] way, that's the one that's that's that's

[12:18] military intel. I think they're bigger

[12:20] and better. But what do I know? You

[12:22] know, someone agrees.

[12:26] If someone agrees with you strongly,

[12:28] Mossad or MI6 or something, they throw

[12:31] these things around and they they throw

[12:34] these things around [snorts]

[12:36] and it's kind of old. Remember 911? 911.

[12:40] Oh my god. The dancing is ran. There we

[12:43] go again. Assad, the dancing Israelis,

[12:46] and then there was the um that of course

[12:48] MI5, MI6, CIA, uh PAC was oh

[12:53] military-industrial complex. And then we

[12:55] get into things like MIC, PAC, we get

[12:57] the the globalists, we get the the

[12:59] transnationals, we get all these we just

[13:02] the more you could throw up. Now it's

[13:04] Fed slop. Everything now is the slop.

[13:07] You notice that? Then it was the blob.

[13:09] You got to get your jargon correct. You

[13:11] got to get your your your Argo, your

[13:13] Argot, your lexicon.

[13:15] If somebody asks for evidence CIA, it's

[13:18] it's it's easy content and it's

[13:20] exciting. Requires absolutely no

[13:22] thinking whatsoever. And you just say

[13:25] the word and people react.

[13:28] That that's not investigation. That's

[13:30] entertainment. Okay? Nothing wrong with

[13:32] that. But understand what's going on

[13:34] here. And this is where Mitch Snow comes

[13:37] in. [laughter]

[13:38] Haha. Who is this guy? Who is this Mitch

[13:42] Snow? I don't like the sound of it. I

[13:45] don't believe a word he says. This old

[13:47] fat soul. Don't give me this green B

[13:49] special up. Roll that guy. I'm not

[13:51] buying it. Not buying it. No, sir.

[13:53] [laughter]

[13:55] He's a He's probably most sad or CIA. I

[13:58] don't know who he is. Maybe maybe just

[14:01] maybe it's military intel.

[14:03] People keep asking why he even matters.

[14:05] Me.

[14:07] I'm asking. and say, "Okay, you saw

[14:09] these people. No offense, Candy. No

[14:12] offense, Mitch, but so what?" [snorts]

[14:15] This is not exactly the lynch pin. The

[14:18] answer is not because he's perfect or

[14:19] because everything has he says must be

[14:22] true or any of this stuff. He matters

[14:25] because he creates a a kind of a crack

[14:28] in the story. They think that people

[14:31] want sealed shut.

[14:33] They witnesses like him

[14:37] well witnesses like him, you know, force

[14:40] explanations. You know, when you when

[14:41] you bring him in, they force timelines

[14:44] and they force people to say where they

[14:47] were and when. The best thing to do, by

[14:51] the way, just to let you know something,

[14:53] if you really want to, if if Mitch

[14:55] bothers you, you know what you say? You

[14:58] say he doesn't matter.

[15:01] The story doesn't matter. That's the

[15:03] best way,

[15:05] Mitch. Whatever. Whatever. I'm You You

[15:09] dismiss it as unimportant.

[15:12] You say that his story adds no real

[15:14] connection to the story. You You tell

[15:16] people that what what's what's the big

[15:18] deal? Whether he was wuka at this hotel,

[15:22] he was getting the things or what does

[15:24] it matter? And when you keep bringing up

[15:27] all these other channels and other

[15:29] sources that likewise run interference,

[15:32] what's the point of this?

[15:34] I'm I'm I'm telling you, this is the

[15:38] strangest thing. Candace should make up

[15:40] a name,

[15:43] you know, uh Perl Turwilliger. Just make

[15:46] up a name and then say, "What's he have

[15:48] to do with it?" And I swear to you, in

[15:50] five minutes, THEY'LL SAY, "WHO THAT

[15:51] TURWILLIGER? HE'S MOSAD." THEY'LL JUST

[15:54] JUMP in and not even ask who is this

[15:56] person. It doesn't matter. Two reasons

[16:00] to stay on board, to be in the, you

[16:02] know, in the in the game, so to speak.

[16:03] Get the get the clicks, get the metrics,

[16:05] but also just to

[16:08] look,

[16:10] I'm going to say it. A lot of people are

[16:11] saying, you know, some of these folks

[16:14] seem to be uh talking about this stuff a

[16:18] little too much. You don't think they're

[16:20] being paid by anybody, do you?

[16:23] Hm. I'm just saying. I'm just saying.

[16:27] See, there was that old Moby story.

[16:29] Remember Moby? Remember I tell you this

[16:31] all the time? How they came to him and

[16:33] wanted to get his his social media

[16:35] platform. See, if I can get if I can get

[16:37] five of the pick pick five people, okay,

[16:42] let's say ju just five people. Alex and

[16:45] uh let's say Alex, Russell Brand, just

[16:47] throw some names out. Megan Kelly, uh,

[16:50] uh, Tucker, just just name them just in

[16:54] terms of sheer raw,

[16:57] you know, uh, follower metrics and

[16:59] firepower and turn them all against

[17:01] Candace.

[17:03] One would think that that would somehow

[17:06] destroy her. No, it bolsters her. You

[17:10] see, I don't understand

[17:13] if if if the the mint business if the

[17:16] story were solid,

[17:18] that shouldn't be a problem. But if the

[17:20] story is fragile, they think the witness

[17:22] becomes the enemy. It it's it's the

[17:24] strangest thing. And again, how all of a

[17:28] sudden overnight

[17:32] this guy is the lynchpin. He has become

[17:35] Do you remember a while back?

[17:38] Maybe you don't. Saulinski,

[17:41] remember this. Saul Alolinski, nobody,

[17:45] the instructions for radicals or

[17:47] whatever you want to call it. Saulinski

[17:50] overnight

[17:52] was in every conservative cable news

[17:55] guys, you know, uh, quiver. Saulinsky.

[17:59] You don't want to get like Saul,

[18:01] this is classic sleinsky.

[18:04] That's the Mitch Snow thing.

[18:08] Notice what critics focus on when Mitch

[18:10] is discussed. Not the dates, not the

[18:14] locations, not whether he could have

[18:16] actually been, you know, where he said

[18:18] he was when he said he was there.

[18:21] Instead, that's right, they go straight

[18:23] to his personal life, his past, his his

[18:26] relationships, his looks, his weight,

[18:30] his intelligence, his alleged behavior.

[18:33] That's not how you test a claim. That's

[18:35] how you avoid one.

[18:37] And a person can be deeply flawed and

[18:40] still tell the truth about what they

[18:43] saw. You don't if if Ted Bundy,

[18:49] Ted Bundy, Charles Manson,

[18:53] the BTK killer, and John Wayne Gayy all

[18:57] were standing together and something

[19:00] happened at 10:00. And I said, "Mr.

[19:02] Bundy, what time did this happen?"

[19:04] "10:00, Mr. Manson." 10 o'clock. Mr.

[19:07] Gayy 10 o'clock Mr. BT 10 o'clock.

[19:13] You sit there say they're crazy. Don't

[19:14] you understand? He's a killer. No, you

[19:17] got the time. It's about the time. Yeah,

[19:19] but he's a killer. No, I know he's a

[19:20] killer. I know. Yes, I know that happens

[19:22] all the time in federal court. Look at

[19:24] Sammy the Bull. I don't know how many

[19:26] people he supposedly killed, but he put

[19:28] people away and they needed him because

[19:30] if you want to get to certain

[19:31] information, you're going to be getting

[19:33] people who were in this kind of intel

[19:35] world. Remember that remember the whole

[19:37] story? Remember James Jesus Angleton?

[19:40] Roaring alcoholic FB uh CIA huge.

[19:44] Remember Helms? Remember um just go down

[19:47] the list. Anyway, we're

[19:52] Gordon Litty. These people were crackers

[19:56] in a in an kind of an artistic way.

[19:59] History is full of examples of that. I

[20:01] don't have to tell you this, but they

[20:03] act like somehow somebody's going to say

[20:06] something and you're going to disqualify

[20:07] everything that Candace has said because

[20:09] of some particular fact or factoid as

[20:12] people say from his past. Now, in real

[20:14] prosecutions, witnesses are rarely

[20:16] saints. I told you this before. They're

[20:18] insiders. They're messy. They're

[20:21] compromised. They're human. That's not a

[20:24] weakness. That's often why they know

[20:26] anything at all.

[20:29] Pretending that truth only comes from

[20:31] from what? From perfect people is

[20:33] ridiculous. That's something only said

[20:36] by people who have absolutely no idea of

[20:39] what's going on and who have never

[20:40] really looked closely at power. They

[20:42] have no idea of how this thing works.

[20:45] And the same pattern the same pattern

[20:47] shows up in the

[20:49] in the attacks on Candace Owens. Instead

[20:52] of and and I'm I'm I'm I'm echoing

[20:55] myself. Instead of addressing what she

[20:57] is actually saying, critics focus on

[20:59] what she is married to or who she's

[21:01] married to, I guess, or whom she is

[21:03] married to.

[21:05] They focus on what they imagine her

[21:07] motives are and

[21:09] which shadowy group they claim controls

[21:12] her.

[21:13] Then once you label someone, you notice

[21:16] how they're backing off on the Tucker

[21:18] thing. Tucker's a Qatari agent and he

[21:21] bought a property and cutter and he's

[21:23] he's a he's a he's a

[21:27] it's like it doesn't stick. You know,

[21:30] you try it. It's like this isn't

[21:31] working. It's not Sometimes it works,

[21:34] sometimes it doesn't. But once you label

[21:36] someone as an agent, you never have to

[21:39] answer their questions. But once the

[21:41] label sticks, you see that's the point

[21:43] of this. That's the critical point of

[21:45] this. Look, I've been to this before and

[21:46] you have too, but I guess what I'm

[21:48] saying is axiomatic. That's why figures

[21:51] like Alex Jones turning on her matter

[21:53] less than people think. All due respect,

[21:55] all due respect to AJ, when the response

[21:58] jumps straight to SCOPS and MK Ultra

[22:00] talk and that kind of thing, it's not

[22:03] it's not strength. It's loss of control.

[22:08] It tells the audience that the speaker

[22:11] doesn't trust the facts to carry the

[22:14] argument anymore. It indicates that

[22:17] maybe they're reaching for a spectacle,

[22:20] you know, something other than what is

[22:22] remotely uh the truth. Now, the irony in

[22:24] all this is that this strategy usually

[22:27] backfires. The louder the smears, the

[22:30] more curious people become. This again

[22:32] is axiomatic. It's the truth. Audiences

[22:35] aren't stupid. We are not stupid. See,

[22:39] they know the difference between and we

[22:40] know the difference between disagreement

[22:42] and a pile on. We've seen this before.

[22:45] And when the reaction feels rehearsed

[22:48] and extreme, people start asking why.

[22:52] Why is this?

[22:55] People also start notice noticing when

[22:57] people aren't acting right. In the case

[22:58] of of Erica Kirk, we'll get to that

[23:01] later. Candace Owens is not asking

[23:04] people to take her word on faith. That's

[23:06] not what she's saying. She's not saying,

[23:07] "Look, believe me, because you know I'm"

[23:09] No, she's not asking for blind belief or

[23:12] some kind of weird obeisance. She's

[23:15] asking why certain questions are treated

[23:17] as verboten and forbidden and out of

[23:20] bounds. She's asking why wrong dates

[23:24] keep being used to debunk claims about

[23:27] different dates. She's asking why

[23:30] explanations are indirect instead of

[23:34] straightforward.

[23:36] And those are reasonable questions.

[23:38] Those are reasonable questions whether

[23:40] you like her or not where you you know

[23:41] who she is. It's just it's just

[23:44] reasonable. And the focus on her mental

[23:47] health and supposed intelligence ties

[23:50] and maybe her own rudimentary

[23:51] intelligence. I don't think anybody

[23:52] questions her intelligence. She's very

[23:53] very smart. But all that's a

[23:55] distraction. It keeps people from having

[23:57] to do the boring, tedious, hard work of

[24:02] walking through timelines and evidence

[24:05] and it turns a factual dispute into a

[24:08] personality war and that's easier to

[24:11] manage and much easier to monetize. Let

[24:15] me explain something to you which is

[24:16] something very critical. Um when when

[24:20] people are involved in

[24:25] something they get to feel bulletproof.

[24:29] They feel like they don't have to watch

[24:30] for anything. They they feel like they

[24:32] don't have to worry about what they do

[24:33] and where they go and what they say and

[24:36] with whom they associate. They feel

[24:38] bulletproof. They feel invisible.

[24:41] They feel like don't you understand?

[24:42] We're we're TPUSA. I'm Erica Kirk. I'm

[24:44] so and so. I don't have to worry about

[24:46] this. I've got the whole, you know who

[24:47] runs us? We are all multi-millionaires.

[24:51] We're We run the most important organ.

[24:54] And by the way, TPUSA is done. Sorry.

[24:57] I'm sorry to say it, but that was

[24:59] Charlie. And without Charlie, that dog

[25:01] don't hunt. Remember that creepy kid? I

[25:04] don't even know his name. Remember, they

[25:06] tried to push him. And then Ben Shapiro

[25:09] speaking real creepy. No.

[25:12] No. It's it's it's like it's like

[25:15] watching a timelapsed

[25:18] desiccation of a of a rat. Do you ever

[25:20] see that sometime they show like a rat

[25:22] that's decomposing? That's TPUSA. You

[25:25] can just see it shrink down into the

[25:27] bones and fur. And it's sad

[25:30] because nobody is they're worried now

[25:33] about themselves and their cover and

[25:35] Erica's books and issues on this show

[25:37] and the gold may and this and that and

[25:39] the I mean just it the the the

[25:44] stage craft is abominable. Now this is

[25:47] also by the way why the obsession with

[25:48] Candace so much has also grown so large

[25:50] and out of control. She has become

[25:53] content. Every attack, every single

[25:56] attack, every time you mention her

[25:58] generates clicks. Every response

[26:00] generates another video. No one, no one

[26:04] benefits from resolution

[26:07] and completion and conclusion except the

[26:10] audience. Everyone else benefits from

[26:12] confusion,

[26:14] and confusion keeps the story alive. And

[26:18] just when I think, okay, we're done with

[26:19] this. Oh no, not even close. And by the

[26:22] way, we're going to be nowhere near

[26:23] close. Strip away all of that and what

[26:26] is left is simple. Candace Owens is a

[26:28] commentary

[26:30] machine, a commentator

[26:33] asking questions about a serious event

[26:34] that last time I checked we all cared

[26:36] about, and she's refusing to be silenced

[26:38] by ridicule. Period. Mitch Snow is a

[26:41] witness whose presence at certain places

[26:44] can be verified even

[26:48] even if this if his conclusions are

[26:50] debated. Is he critical to the story?

[26:53] No. Is he the lynch pin? No. No. The

[26:57] rest is noise layered on top of noise.

[26:59] And you know how that is. You do not

[27:02] have to agree. I'm saying this again

[27:04] with Candace Owens. You do not have to

[27:06] agree with anything she's ever said. You

[27:07] don't have to trust Mitch or anybody.

[27:11] You do not have to believe there is

[27:12] anything more to uncover.

[27:15] That's fine. That is up to you. But

[27:18] turning Candice into a super villain

[27:21] controlled by every

[27:24] every intel agency on the planet is not

[27:28] skepticism. It's avoidance. It's

[27:30] desperation. And it fuels her legacy and

[27:33] her importance. Listen to what she's

[27:35] actually saying.

[27:36] Look at the date she is pointing to and

[27:38] ask yourself how critical is this? How

[27:40] important is this? Look at the responses

[27:42] she's getting. Look at the responses

[27:44] that she's generating. Then decide.

[27:46] Everything else is theater.

[27:49] Theater that's meant to

[27:52] scare people away from paying attention.

[27:54] And meanwhile, the the sad part is the

[27:57] people who killed I mean, if you believe

[27:58] this believe this this Tyler uh

[28:01] Robinson's story with a 30 out six and

[28:03] the bone. I mean, come on, man. Come on,

[28:07] dude. And the reason the focus on

[28:09] Candace has become so intense, as you

[28:12] know, and as I've said, is not because

[28:13] she is weak. It is because she is

[28:16] strong, she is independent, and still

[28:19] being heard and at levels you can't

[28:22] imagine. And that is why people are

[28:25] really reacting to whether they admit it

[28:27] or not, right? They're just going. So,

[28:30] that's where we are with this one. So

[28:32] please, please put this into

[28:35] perspective. Now, let me tell you, thank

[28:37] you for watching. Thank you for your

[28:39] your comments are terrific. Absolutely

[28:42] positively terrific

[28:45] and

[28:47] you they've been wonderful. So, please

[28:49] follow this. I've got some questions for

[28:51] you in the background in in the back

[28:53] under the comments section. And I also

[28:55] want to tell you how much I appreciate

[28:56] you following my wife at Lyn's Warriors.

[28:59] Let me tell you something on on a

[29:00] regular beat and I hope we get to this

[29:02] to to

[29:04] soon. By the way, this this is hands

[29:06] down more important than than Mitch

[29:08] Snow.

[29:09] There is a war on for our children. Our

[29:12] children are the next generation and

[29:15] plus and for we we are destroying the

[29:17] foundation of American civilization in

[29:19] particular to begin with. We are

[29:21] destroying their childhood. We're

[29:23] destroying their perspective. We are

[29:27] what what's happening to children by big

[29:30] tech is out of control. Please follow

[29:35] Lind's Warriors on YouTube to see what

[29:37] I'm talking about because that's

[29:40] our passion.

[29:42] Listen, let me tell you something. You

[29:44] might just uh might just have tuned in

[29:46] for the first time. I'm not a Republican

[29:48] registered independent. I think

[29:50] political parties, both of them are

[29:52] worthless. Okay?

[29:54] I like what I like Trump because there's

[29:57] nobody else. He makes a lot of mistakes,

[29:59] but there's something there. And his

[30:01] problem, by the way, is not him, I

[30:03] think, inherently, but the people he

[30:04] hangs around with. But that's another

[30:05] story. So, we'll get to him. Get to

[30:07] Erica Kirk. We get to other stuff as

[30:08] well. But let me just thank you for your

[30:11] your thoughts have been so terrific.

[30:12] Thank you for for weighing in and for

[30:15] being a part of this. And um as uh we

[30:18] always say uh at the end of this at the

[30:20] conclusion, comment, dear friend.

[30:22] Comment as you see fit.