Charlie Kirk Challenges University of Washington Students on Democracy, Immigration, Feminism, and the Value of College Education

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Defends Republic Over Democracy in Fiery Campus Debate on Education and American Values

Charlie Kirk Defends Republic Over Democracy in Fiery Campus Debate on Education and American Values

5:49

Charlie Kirk Defends Why Democracy Is Not a Fundamental American Value in Fiery College Debate

Charlie Kirk Defends Why Democracy Is Not a Fundamental American Value in Fiery College Debate

5:04

Charlie Kirk Explains Why He Believes College Is a Scam for Half of All Students

Charlie Kirk Explains Why He Believes College Is a Scam for Half of All Students

4:15

Charlie Kirk Challenges University of Washington Students on Democracy, Immigration, Feminism, and the Value of College Education

Charlie Kirk confronts University of Washington students in a series of heated exchanges about fundamental American principles. From debating whether democracy is truly an American value to defending his stance that every illegal immigrant should be deported, Kirk pushes back against progressive narratives on immigration, hookup culture, feminism, and the college system itself. Students challenge his views on education, relationships, and civil discourse, leading to tense but revealing conversations about the future of America and whether college is worth the investment. Kirk argues that the Constitution never mentions democracy, that illegal immigrants are criminals regardless of contributions, and that universities are scamming students while indoctrinating them with left-wing ideology.

December 27, 2024

Democracy Is Not an American Value

When asked if democracy is an American value, Charlie Kirk emphatically says no. He challenges students to find the word "democracy" anywhere in the U.S. Constitution, The Federalist Papers, or the Declaration of Independence. Kirk points out that when democracy is mentioned in The Federalist Papers, it's discussed negatively as a problem to avoid.

"I am pro-representative government but I'm not pro-democracy. That's a big difference and that distinction is important," Kirk explains. He defines democracy as pure majority rule without provisions for checks and balances, inalienable rights, or separation of powers. Kirk advocates for the republic system the Founders established, where representative government protects minority rights against the tyranny of the majority.

Education Versus Wisdom

A student argues that in a representative system where citizens vote, shouldn't everyone be as educated as possible? Kirk responds that people should be "as wise as possible" and that education and wisdom are not the same thing. In fact, he believes college disincentivizes the cultivation of wisdom.

When accused of promoting anti-intellectualism, Kirk pushes back hard. He argues that the right's criticism of higher education isn't because they hate smart people, but because colleges have created "an ungrateful, unprepared generation that goes into the American body politic and does not share the core American values of freedom of speech, gratitude for our founding, consent of the governed."

Kirk defends his position by pointing to Hillsdale College as an example of rigorous education in pursuit of truth, beauty, and goodness. The problem isn't learning itself—Kirk says he learns every day from various sources—but rather that students are "learning largely trash and crap" without cultivating wisdom or good character.

The Immigration Debate Gets Personal

The conversation turns explosive when students of immigrant backgrounds challenge Kirk's immigration stance. Kirk maintains that anyone in the country illegally should be deported, regardless of their contributions to society. When a student mentions that illegal immigrants often flee devastating political situations, Kirk responds that having an unstable country doesn't give anyone the right to break into America.

"If you come into a country uninvited, definitionally you are a criminal," Kirk states bluntly. He compares illegal immigration to breaking into someone's home, arguing that even if the intruder does the dishes and laundry, they should still be removed because they trespassed.

One particularly tense exchange occurs with a student whose mother entered the country illegally from Mexico. Kirk tells the student directly: "Your mom's a criminal and every day she stayed here is no different than squatting." He argues that illegal immigrants take the place of legal immigrants from around the world who wait decades to enter America properly.

Kirk emphasizes that he has sympathy for people in difficult situations worldwide, but insists that America's first obligation is to its own citizens. With the current generation being the first in American history to be worse off than their parents—drowning in debt, unable to afford homes, and competing for jobs against foreigners—Kirk argues the government should say "time out" on immigration until Americans at least have it as good as their parents did.

Feminism and the Happiness Question

When asked about feminism and conservatism, Kirk distinguishes between three waves of feminism. He supports first-wave feminism (women's right to vote) and acknowledges some good aspects of second-wave feminism, but completely rejects third-wave feminism as "toxic modern-day feminism" that's more about hating men than respecting women.

Kirk presents data showing that American women today are more suicidal, depressed, and anxious than in previous generations. He points out that half of unmarried women in their 30s are on antidepressants—something never before seen in American society. Meanwhile, women with three or more children are the happiest and least suicidal women in America.

When a student argues that women should establish their careers before having children, Kirk flips the script: "I think you should have kids first then do your career because which one has a timetable on it?" He warns that waiting might result in infertility, difficulty conceiving, and the inability to find a mate, while careers can be pursued later in life.

Hookup Culture and OnlyFans

Kirk addresses the dating landscape and hookup culture, advocating for waiting until marriage to have sex—a practice he followed himself. When students express that this is unrealistic and uninteresting, Kirk asks if they wouldn't prefer a world where they only shared sexual experiences with their soulmate.

The conversation takes an unexpected turn when a student who creates OnlyFans content engages with Kirk. She claims that being in adult content has "strengthened" her relationship with her boyfriend through open communication about boundaries and jealousy. Kirk challenges this, arguing that sex involves more than physical connection—it's an "energy exchange" that should be reserved for one's soulmate.

When the student admits she wouldn't continue doing adult content if she could make a million dollars annually without it, Kirk presses further. After learning she doesn't have a good relationship with her father, Kirk suggests this might be connected to her choices, prompting frustration from the audience but illustrating his point about the deeper issues behind modern sexual behavior.

College Is a Scam

Multiple students challenge Kirk's assertion that college is a scam. Kirk presents several arguments: the vast majority of students graduate with jobs that don't require a college degree, students go tens of thousands of dollars into debt for credentials worth less in the marketplace, and 41% of students who enter college don't even graduate.

When an economics major challenges him, Kirk asks if the student has learned about Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Friedrich Hayek, or Frédéric Bastiat. The student hasn't been taught any of these free-market economists, though they have studied John Maynard Keynes. Kirk uses this as proof that students aren't getting an education but an indoctrination—they're learning only demand-side economics from one ideological perspective.

Kirk acknowledges there are 11 million job openings in America paying $80,000 or more that don't require a college degree. He argues that society treats young people as "dumb" if they don't attend a four-year university, when in reality they could learn valuable skills like coding in eight weeks or pursue trades that offer excellent careers.

A computer science student pushes back, arguing that in an oversaturated job market, employers want more than basic qualifications—they want college degrees from reputable programs. Kirk counters that employers are increasingly less interested in college graduates because they're entitled, work the least, and are quickest to complain to HR. After five years in the workforce, Kirk argues, nobody cares where someone went to college.

Defunding State Colleges

Kirk advocates for ending all federal grants and subsidies to colleges. He believes institutions should survive on their own merits rather than taxpayer support. When asked about the difference between state and private colleges, Kirk explains that state schools like University of Washington receive subsidized in-state tuition funded by taxes, while private schools must stand on their own.

Kirk argues that the college-educated generation is the most depressed, anxious, alcohol-addicted, drug-addicted, least married, and angriest generation in American history. He questions whether college has truly enriched society or whether the credential-obsessed system has failed young people while indoctrinating them with ideology rather than teaching practical skills and wisdom.

The Purpose of Civil Discourse

When accused of being divisive and using "clickbait" tactics, Kirk responds that he's actually promoting unity through open dialogue. He argues that America gets closer to civil war when people refuse to talk to those they disagree with and instead resort to yelling, protesting in masks, or worse.

"You heal the country when you allow disagreement and you allow a microphone with people that have differing views," Kirk states. He challenges his critics to come to the microphone and engage with him directly rather than urging others to stay away. Kirk calls them "intellectual cowards" for refusing to participate in open debate while criticizing him for creating division.

Throughout the event, Kirk maintains that his goal is to push the boundaries of discussion and help students realize they're being "ripped off" by their institutions. While many students leave unconvinced by his arguments, the conversations reveal deep fault lines in how young Americans think about democracy, immigration, relationships, education, and the future of the country.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!