2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Debates SimpleBlackTheory on DEI Versus Merit in Hiring Practices and the Workplace
Charlie Kirk sits down for a heated debate with SimpleBlackTheory on one of the most contentious issues in America today: DEI versus merit-based hiring. The conversation quickly escalates as they clash over blind hiring, affirmative action, United Airlines' pilot programs, and whether diversity initiatives help or hurt excellence. Kirk argues that forced diversity compromises standards, while SimpleBlackTheory contends that DEI creates safer, more equitable workplaces. From the NBA's desegregation to Google's hiring committees, air traffic controller standards to workplace accessibility, this exchange exposes the fundamental disagreement about race, excellence, and the future of American institutions. Kirk maintains that character and merit should trump skin color every time, while his opponent insists DEI encompasses far more than racial quotas.
Charlie Kirk opens the debate by asking SimpleBlackTheory a straightforward question: What do you think about blind hiring? The question sets the tone for what becomes a contentious exchange about merit, diversity, and hiring practices in America.
SimpleBlackTheory initially says no to blind hiring, prompting Kirk to press further. When asked to define blind hiring, the conversation reveals the core tension. Blind hiring means not knowing a candidate's race, age, or gender during the hiring process—theoretically creating a purely merit-based system.
Kirk challenges this by presenting a hypothetical scenario about hiring an Amazon warehouse worker. If age isn't disclosed and you discover the candidate is 69 years old with one year left before retirement versus a 24-year-old man, wouldn't the employer prefer the younger candidate? SimpleBlackTheory accuses Kirk of moving the goalpost, but Kirk insists he wants a full picture of a human being when hiring them.
This leads to the fundamental question: Does Kirk care about diversity? His answer is clear and emphatic: No, he doesn't care about diversity. He explains that if diversity happens naturally through meritocracy, that's fine. But DEI, he argues, is about forcibly making institutions more colorful or more black. Kirk wants excellence and meritocracy over race in every possible circumstance.
The NBA Example: Natural Merit or Forced Diversity?
The debate shifts to sports when SimpleBlackTheory brings up the NBA. At one point, black people weren't allowed in the NBA, then they were allowed. Wouldn't that be considered diversity? Wouldn't that be DEI?
Kirk's response cuts to the heart of his argument: No, that's actually the opposite. What existed before was a form of white preference DEI—white supremacy. When that was eliminated and discrimination ended, the quality of play got better because it became merit-based. The difference, Kirk emphasizes, is between forced racial quotas and removing racial barriers to allow natural excellence to emerge.
This distinction becomes central to Kirk's position throughout the debate. He argues that his opponent actually wants to bring back a form of how Major League Baseball and the NBA used to work before desegregation—systems that used race as a determining factor, just in reverse.
Executive Order 11246 and the Definition of DEI
SimpleBlackTheory references Executive Order 11246, claiming it focuses on creating safer and more equitable environments in the workplace and hiring process. He offers an unusual example: workplace bathrooms providing tampons or pads for women. According to him, that's DEI.
Kirk doesn't dispute that such initiatives might fall under DEI but challenges the broader premise. The debate becomes heated as SimpleBlackTheory insists that DEI encompasses workplace safety, accessibility, and equity—not just racial quotas. He mentions onboarding processes, sexual harassment training, and accommodations for disabled workers at places like Trader Joe's as examples of DEI in action.
Kirk remains focused on what he sees as the core problem: DEI is racial quotas, end of story. He argues that when you pursue diversity, you sacrifice excellence every time. He points to Harvard, Yale, and the military as examples where the pursuit of diversity has compromised standards.
Google's Hiring Committee: Does DEI Work?
When SimpleBlackTheory brings up Google as an example of successful DEI implementation, Kirk pushes back hard. Google, he notes, has lost its competitive edge over the last decade. The company has failed to compete in social media, losing battles in launching Facebook, Instagram, Zoom, and Skype competitors.
Kirk points out that Alphabet (Google's parent company) has missed market expectations over the last two years compared to Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. Ten years ago, predictions said Google would be the first three-trillion-dollar company, but Microsoft achieved that milestone first.
SimpleBlackTheory argues that Google uses a hiring committee—a diverse group making hiring decisions—and remains one of the best companies in the world. If DEI takes away merit, he asks, how can Google be doing well while using DEI?
Kirk's response: Google wasn't built with these DEI hiring committees from inception. Whatever success Google has achieved came from merit, and DEI is now destroying that foundation. The fundamental question remains unanswered in Kirk's view: Why does skin color matter at all in hiring?
United Airlines and the Pilot Program Controversy
The debate reaches a flashpoint when Kirk brings up United Airlines. SimpleBlackTheory accuses Kirk of claiming United Airlines is hiring women of color to make up 40 or 50 percent of pilots when in reality, they're creating training programs that allow women to become pilots with the same requirements as any other program.
Kirk clarifies his actual statement: If you're going to go from 4 percent of pilots being black to 50 percent being black, it begs the question whether you're lowering standards. You're forcing something that's not happening naturally, and you're playing a dangerous game when people board planes.
Kirk's position is straightforward: When getting heart surgery or boarding a plane, he doesn't care about the color of the skin of the person doing it. He wants excellence and meritocracy.
The debate intensifies when Kirk references a lawsuit with the Department of Transportation from 2016-2017. He claims air traffic controller and pilot standards were lowered in pursuit of diversity, citing over 15 whistleblowers who said standards were being sacrificed.
SimpleBlackTheory disputes this, claiming the FAA actually made requirements harder by adding more scenarios. He accuses Kirk of lying, while Kirk insists people can do their own independent research and that the documents support his claims.
Blind Hiring Revisited: The Core Disagreement
Near the end of the debate, SimpleBlackTheory circles back to the blind hiring question, arguing that Kirk's opposition to blind hiring—which is based on merit—proves he doesn't actually care about merit.
Kirk pushes back, saying the issue is that companies like United Airlines prioritize certain groups above what is meritocratic. They've announced that half of all their new hires would meet specific diversity criteria, which Kirk sees as the opposite of merit-based hiring.
The Final Clash: Two Competing Visions
Kirk concludes the debate by framing the fundamental disagreement with clarity: He wants a country based on content and merit. SimpleBlackTheory, he argues, wants a retribalization of America based on skin color.
The debate exposes two entirely different worldviews about how American institutions should function. Kirk sees DEI as racial stereotyping that compromises excellence in the name of forced diversity. His opponent sees DEI as creating safer, more accessible, more equitable workplaces that help qualified people from all backgrounds succeed.
Throughout the exchange, Kirk repeatedly asks why skin color should matter in hiring. His opponent insists that DEI is about far more than race—it's about accessibility, safety, and equity. But Kirk remains unconvinced, arguing that whenever an organization gets forcibly more diverse, it gets worse, not better.
The question left hanging at the end: Can America pursue both diversity and excellence, or are they fundamentally at odds? Kirk believes merit and excellence must come first, and if diversity results from that, fine. His opponent believes that creating equitable systems through DEI initiatives is what allows merit to flourish. The debate, like the national conversation it reflects, ends without resolution—but with the core disagreement clearly defined.
