Charlie Kirk Defends Derek Chauvin Pardon and Challenges George Floyd Narrative in Heated Campus Exchange

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Debates College Student on Fatherhood, Crime, and Breaking the Cycle of Poverty in Black Communities

Charlie Kirk Debates College Student on Fatherhood, Crime, and Breaking the Cycle of Poverty in Black Communities

10:45

Charlie Kirk Confronts Student on Viral Consent Clip and Sexual Assault Definitions at Campus Event

Charlie Kirk Confronts Student on Viral Consent Clip and Sexual Assault Definitions at Campus Event

8:15

Tucker Carlson and Vince Everett Ellison Expose the George Floyd Narrative and Democratic Party's Vision for Black America

Tucker Carlson and Vince Everett Ellison Expose the George Floyd Narrative and Democratic Party's Vision for Black America

8:34

Charlie Kirk Defends Derek Chauvin Pardon and Challenges George Floyd Narrative in Heated Campus Exchange

Charlie Kirk faces intense questioning about his stance on pardoning Derek Chauvin, the officer convicted in George Floyd's death. In this confrontational campus dialogue, Kirk argues that Floyd died from a drug overdose rather than police restraint, that the knee-on-neck technique was an approved police method, and that Chauvin deserved a fair trial free from media influence. The exchange reveals deep divisions over police conduct, trial fairness, and the national reckoning following Floyd's death.

January 2, 2026

Challenging the George Floyd Narrative

A student approaches Charlie Kirk with a direct question about his position on pardoning Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer convicted in the death of George Floyd. Kirk immediately challenges the premise, stating that George Floyd did not die because of the police officer but largely because of a drug overdose.

When the student points out that everyone saw the video of Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck, Kirk responds that the knee-on-neck restraint is actually an approved police technique that police departments taught Derek Chauvin to use. He adds that Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe even before the restraining technique was applied, suggesting the breathing difficulty was not caused by the restraint itself.

The Restraint Technique and Police Training

Kirk explains that officers used the restraint technique because Floyd was resisting arrest, and they restrained him in a way they were taught to do. When pressed about when the technique should end, Kirk states it ends when the individual stops resisting arrest.

He emphasizes that Floyd's cause of death was not asphyxiation but drug overdose, acknowledging that heart conditions and drug use were contributing factors. Kirk argues that according to the medical examiner, Floyd was experiencing a drug overdose in real time, not dying because of the police officer's actions.

Kirk notes that the Hennepin County police department teaches the knee-on-neck technique as an approved restraint method, making it a standard procedure Chauvin was trained to execute.

The Show Trial Argument

When the student asks why Chauvin was sentenced if the medical evidence supported Kirk's claims, Kirk characterizes the trial as a "show trial" - one conducted for display or political purposes rather than justice. He argues that Derek Chauvin was not given a fair hearing and was not even allowed to use the police training handbook in his trial to demonstrate that he was taught to use that restraining technique.

Kirk contends that the entire country erupted because of this incident based largely on a lie - the narrative that a white police officer targeted a black person simply because of his race. Kirk maintains this wasn't true, asserting that Floyd was resisting arrest and the situation unfolded differently than the popular narrative suggests.

The Call for a Pardon

When asked directly what should happen to Derek Chauvin, Kirk's answer is simple: a pardon. He believes Chauvin should be free, and that this would send a message about the importance of fair trials and not allowing media-driven proceedings to replace proper justice.

Kirk argues that the message of a pardon would be that defendants deserve actual fair trials and won't be subject to trial by media, where public pressure and political considerations override legal standards and evidence.

A Tense Exchange

The conversation becomes heated when the student expresses frustration about being interrupted. The student complains that every time they try to explain their point or have a reasonable conversation, Kirk cuts them off. The student accuses Kirk of bringing up random statistics and facts to make them look stupid rather than engaging in genuine dialogue.

The video ends with a lighter moment as Kirk asks another student about their "persona" and what animal speaks to them, receiving the answer "the beaver" before moving on to the next conversation.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!