[00:00] Tyler Robinson, the man accused of
[00:01] murdering Charlie Kirk, laughing with
[00:03] his attorneys before court as he sits in
[00:06] a Utah County courtroom for the very
[00:08] first time for a hearing related to his
[00:10] murder case. And he's in street clothes
[00:12] as Charlie Kirk's widow fires back at
[00:15] conspiracy theorists, cashing in on her
[00:18] husband's murder.
[00:19] >> I want justice for my husband, for
[00:22] myself, for my family more than anyone
[00:24] else out there.
[00:25] >> I take a look at the very latest in the
[00:27] case. What we know about Charlie Kirk's
[00:29] alleged assassin [music] and how
[00:31] Robinson's attorneys are borrowing a
[00:33] page from another high-profile cases
[00:35] playbook.
[00:44] Welcome to Crime Fix. I'm Yanette Levy.
[00:46] It's been exactly three months since an
[00:49] assassin's bullet took the life of
[00:51] conservative activist and commentator
[00:53] Charlie Kirk in an instant on the campus
[00:55] of Utah Valley University. Charlie Kirk
[00:58] was only 31 years old, a husband and a
[01:01] father to two young children, known for
[01:04] going to college campuses to challenge
[01:06] college students, inviting them up to an
[01:09] open mic to discuss ideas. Not everyone
[01:12] agreed with Charlie Kirk, but he was
[01:13] willing to engage. After a 33-hour
[01:16] manhunt, officials announced that
[01:18] 22-year-old Tyler Robinson had been
[01:21] taken into custody.
[01:22] >> Robinson's mother explained that over
[01:24] the last year or so, Robinson had become
[01:27] more political and had started to lean
[01:31] more to the left, becoming more pro-gay
[01:34] and trans rightsoriented.
[01:37] She stated that Robinson began to date
[01:39] his roommate, a biological male who was
[01:42] transi trans transitioning genders.
[01:46] This resulted in several discussions
[01:48] with family members, but especially
[01:51] between Robinson and his father who have
[01:54] very different political views. In one
[01:57] conversation before the shooting,
[01:59] Robinson mentioned that Charlie Kirk
[02:01] would be holding an event at UVU, which
[02:05] Robert Robinson said was a stupid venue
[02:09] for the event. Robinson accused Kirk of
[02:13] spreading hate.
[02:14] >> Now, we learned that Tyler Robinson was
[02:16] a one-time straight A student who left
[02:18] college after just one semester for
[02:20] unknown reasons. He'd been living with a
[02:22] transgender roommate who was
[02:24] transitioning from male to female at the
[02:27] time of Charlie Kirk's murder. And
[02:29] Robinson was a gamer active on Steam and
[02:31] possibly involved in furry culture.
[02:34] Robinson was active on Discord and a
[02:36] spokesperson for the company told me in
[02:38] September that Robinson's account made
[02:40] statements about the shooting after it
[02:42] had happened. Utah County's prosecutor
[02:45] read text between Robinson and his
[02:47] roommate in which he said Robinson
[02:49] confessed to murdering Charlie Kirk.
[02:51] >> Roommate, how long have you been
[02:53] planning this? Robinson, a bit over a
[02:57] week, I believe. I can get close to it,
[03:00] but there is a squad car parked right by
[03:02] it. I think they already swept that
[03:05] spot, but I don't want to chance it.
[03:08] Robinson again. I'm wishing I had
[03:11] circled back and grabbed it as soon as I
[03:13] got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my
[03:16] old man would do if I didn't bring back
[03:18] Grandpa's rifle.
[03:21] Ide if it's had a serial number, but it
[03:25] wouldn't trace to me. I worry about
[03:27] Prince. I had to leave it in a bush
[03:30] where I changed outfits. Didn't have the
[03:32] ability or time to bring it with. I
[03:36] might have to abandon it and hope they
[03:38] don't find Prince.
[03:40] How the f will I explain losing it to my
[03:43] old man? Only thing I left was the
[03:46] rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel.
[03:50] Remember how I was engraving bullets?
[03:53] The effing messages are mostly a big
[03:56] meme. If I see notice Bulge UW on Fox
[04:02] New, I might have a stroke. All right,
[04:05] I'm gonna have to leave it. That really
[04:08] effing sucks.
[04:10] Judging from today, I'd say Grandpa's
[04:12] Gun does just fine. IDK. I think that
[04:16] was a two thou a 2K dollar scope.
[04:22] Wink wink.
[04:24] Um, Robinson, Robinson again, delete
[04:28] this exchange
[04:31] again. Robinson, my dad wants photos of
[04:33] the rifle. He says grandpa wants to know
[04:35] who has what. The feds released a photo
[04:39] of the rifle and it is very unique. He's
[04:42] calling me. RN, not answering. Robinson.
[04:47] Since Trump got into office, my dad has
[04:50] been pretty diehard MAGA.
[04:53] Robinson. I'm gonna turn myself in
[04:56] willingly. One of my neighbors here is a
[04:59] deputy for the sheriff.
[05:02] Again, you are all I worry about. Love
[05:04] that came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm
[05:07] much more worried about you. Robinson,
[05:10] don't talk to the media. Please don't
[05:12] take any interviews or make any
[05:15] comments. If any police ask you
[05:18] questions, ask for a lawyer and stay
[05:21] silent. Now, right now, Tyler Robinson
[05:24] is the only person charged in Charlie
[05:26] Kirk's murder, but the investigation is
[05:28] ongoing. But that hasn't stopped
[05:30] conspiracy theories from spreading like
[05:32] wildfire on the internet and on YouTube
[05:35] among podcasters and others. Erica Kirk,
[05:38] Charlie Kirk's widow, addressed that on
[05:40] the Fox News Channel show Outnumbered
[05:42] this week.
[05:44] >> Anytime we hear a lead or anytime we
[05:46] hear anything, we send it to the
[05:47] authorities. Please dig into this. No
[05:50] rock will be unturned. I want justice
[05:53] for my husband, for myself, for my
[05:56] family more than anyone else out there.
[05:59] So for me, you want to keep telling me
[06:01] to come down while we're we're building.
[06:03] I don't have time for that.
[06:05] >> But here's my breaking point on that.
[06:08] Come after me. Call me names. I don't
[06:10] care. Call me what you want. Go down
[06:12] that rabbit hole, whatever.
[06:15] But when you go after my family, my
[06:18] Turning Point USA family, my Charlie
[06:20] Kirk show family, when you go after the
[06:22] people that I love, and you're making
[06:24] hundreds and thousands of dollars every
[06:28] single episode
[06:30] going after the people that I love
[06:32] because somehow they're in on this.
[06:35] No. And there have been people who've
[06:37] actually suggested that people at
[06:39] Turning Point USA had something to do
[06:41] with Charlie Kirk's murder. Now, we've
[06:43] only seen Tyler Robinson during a court
[06:46] appearance once, and that was via Zoom
[06:48] from the jail during his first
[06:49] appearance.
[06:51] >> Calling case 25143576,
[06:56] State of Utah versus Tyler James
[06:58] Robinson. Could you state your name?
[07:02] >> Tyler James Robinson.
[07:05] >> Thank you for being here, Mr. Robinson.
[07:07] I'm Judge Graph. Being on camera means
[07:09] that having the right makeup to keep my
[07:11] skin happy is really important. I've
[07:14] always hated it when makeup feels cakey
[07:16] or heavy, especially during the holidays
[07:18] when you're running from work to
[07:19] parties. And your skin can start to feel
[07:22] really stressed. But Jones Road Beauty,
[07:24] they get it. All of their products are
[07:26] clean, simple, and actually good for
[07:28] your skin. They're great for that
[07:30] effortless, healthy, no makeup makeup
[07:33] look. You can see how quick and natural
[07:35] this is. I'm actually using the Miracle
[07:37] Balm, which works as a blush, a
[07:39] highlighter, or even a lip stain. It
[07:42] gives a nice all over glow that's
[07:43] holiday party ready, but not overdone.
[07:46] This holiday season, simplify your
[07:48] routine with makeup that's clean,
[07:50] strategic, and multi-functional. And
[07:53] don't miss out on their limited edition
[07:55] holiday sets. They won't be here for
[07:57] long, and once they're gone, they're
[07:59] gone. Also, as a treat for our
[08:01] listeners, you will get a free cool
[08:03] gloss on your first purchase when you
[08:05] use code crimefix at checkout. Just head
[08:08] to jonesroadbeauty.com
[08:10] and use code crimefix at checkout. After
[08:13] you purchase, they will ask you where
[08:15] you heard about them. Please support our
[08:17] show and tell them that we sent you.
[08:20] During that court appearance, Tyler
[08:22] Robinson was wearing a green turtle suit
[08:24] used for people who are on watch to
[08:26] ensure they can't end their lives. At
[08:28] Robinson's subsequent court appearance,
[08:30] he appeared via WebEx with his camera
[08:33] off.
[08:33] >> I remain steadfast in my oath that I
[08:35] made 56 days ago to support and defend
[08:38] the Constitutions of the United States
[08:41] and of Utah. I will carry out my duties
[08:43] with fidelity, transparency, and
[08:46] impartiality.
[08:47] Treating every person who appears before
[08:49] me with the dignity and respect they are
[08:52] inherently due because they are human
[08:54] beings. Let me be clear. I will not put
[08:58] my finger on the scale of justice. These
[09:01] proceedings will be open to the public,
[09:03] conducted in accordance with the law,
[09:05] and handled with diligence and
[09:07] competence to ensure that justice is
[09:10] never compromised. It is the standing
[09:13] order of this court that Mr. Robinson
[09:15] shall be allowed to appear in person so
[09:17] he can fully engage with his attorneys
[09:20] and participate in these legal
[09:22] proceedings.
[09:24] council. Regardless of who is watching,
[09:27] whether it is the nation or a single
[09:29] individual, we must fulfill our roles
[09:32] with integrity,
[09:34] civility, and diligence.
[09:36] >> Since that time, the judge held a closed
[09:38] hearing, and now the media wants the
[09:41] transcript of that hearing. Judge Graph
[09:43] has granted a motion to allow Tyler
[09:45] Robinson to appear in street clothes for
[09:48] all pre-trial hearings, but he has to
[09:50] wear restraints.
[09:52] >> Mr. Robinson also requests to appear
[09:54] unrestrained during pre-trial
[09:55] proceedings. He argues that visible
[09:58] restraints would prejudice potential
[09:59] jurors, undermine his dignity, and
[10:02] interfere with his ability to
[10:04] communicate with counsel. Rule 3-414
[10:10] sub 9C of the Utah Rules of Judicial
[10:12] Administration requires that all in
[10:15] custody defendants be restrained unless
[10:17] otherwise ordered by the court. The
[10:21] court recognizes that Mr. Robinson has
[10:24] no criminal history and no record of
[10:26] misconduct while in custody. However,
[10:30] the charges he faces are extraordinarily
[10:32] serious, carrying potential penalties of
[10:35] life imprisonment or death.
[10:38] The safety of Mr. Robinson, the
[10:40] attorneys, court staff, and the public
[10:43] must remain the court's highest
[10:45] priority. The emotional nature of these
[10:48] proceedings also raise the risk of
[10:50] disruption. Given these factors,
[10:54] the defendant's request to appear
[10:55] without restraint is denied. The court
[10:59] directs the sheriff's department to
[11:01] conduct an individualized assessment and
[11:03] use the least restrictive
[11:05] restraints necessary to maintain safety.
[11:09] If those restraint restraints impede the
[11:11] defendant's ability to communicate with
[11:13] counsel or take notes, council may renew
[11:17] the motion.
[11:19] I wish now to also address the decorum
[11:22] and media restrictions.
[11:24] To mitigate any potential prejudice, the
[11:26] court will amend its standing decorum
[11:28] order. The media will be prohibited from
[11:31] photographing or visually recording Mr.
[11:33] Robinson's restraints and from
[11:35] photographing or recording him while
[11:38] entering, exiting, or standing in the
[11:41] courtroom.
[11:42] >> In a shirt and tie, Tyler Robinson
[11:44] appeared in that Utah County courtroom
[11:46] under heavy, heavy security. He spoke to
[11:49] his lawyers and smiled, even appearing
[11:51] to laugh at times. The hearing was in
[11:54] part because the media wants access to
[11:56] transcripts from that closed hearing
[11:58] from October where courtroom security
[12:00] measures were discussed. The media
[12:02] coalition's lawyers wrote that the media
[12:04] should have access to the transcript,
[12:07] citing several cases. This right of
[12:09] access has a timehonored history rooted
[12:12] in the acknowledgement that courts do
[12:14] the public's business, and an open court
[12:16] fosters and protects important societal
[12:18] values. It enhances the quality and
[12:21] safeguards the integrity of the factf
[12:23] finding process. Improves basic fairness
[12:26] and the appearance of fairness in the
[12:28] proceedings. Fosters public confidence
[12:31] in the judicial process and acceptance
[12:34] of its results. Acts as a check on the
[12:36] judiciary and allows the public to
[12:39] participate in government. Although
[12:41] members of the public may not attend
[12:43] criminal proceedings in large numbers,
[12:45] the news media acts as the public's
[12:47] surrogate in attending such proceedings
[12:49] and reporting to the public, thus
[12:51] educating the public. Now, back to the
[12:53] hearing.
[12:53] >> It comes down we're addressing three
[12:55] issues. The first is the October 14th,
[12:59] 2025 audio recording of the closed
[13:02] hearing and the October 24th, 2025
[13:05] transcript of that hearing. The second
[13:08] is a state's motion to amend or clarify
[13:11] the publicity order commonly known or
[13:14] referred to as the gag order. And
[13:17] finally, the motion for limited
[13:19] intervention and request for notice of
[13:21] motions to close, seal or reclassify
[13:25] um and which has been filed by the media
[13:29] organizations and by council who are
[13:31] present today. So as we begin the first
[13:35] part is we'll begin by addressing the
[13:37] October 14th audio recording and the
[13:39] October 24th transcript. This portion of
[13:43] the hearing will be closed so that I may
[13:46] hear from the parties regarding which
[13:48] portions of the recording uh the record
[13:52] should remain sealed.
[13:53] >> Thank you. Richard Novak for Mr.
[13:55] Robinson. Um Mr. Robinson has some
[13:57] immediate family members who are
[13:58] present. his father, his mother, and his
[14:00] brother. And we would ask the court to
[14:02] permit them to remain in the courtroom
[14:05] during the closed portion of the hearing
[14:07] >> to the state.
[14:10] My only concern with that, your honor,
[14:12] is that we're going to be talking about
[14:13] court security measures and um
[14:19] I don't know that we'll have to go into
[14:20] a lot of detail about that, but I do
[14:22] have concerns about uh those issues
[14:25] being discussed
[14:27] in public.
[14:28] >> All right, Mr. Novak, do you have
[14:29] authority that supports allowing them to
[14:31] remain in a closed hearing?
[14:34] >> Uh, no. I think it's subject to the
[14:36] court's discretion to decide who is and
[14:38] is not an appropriate member of the
[14:41] public. Um, I think they have a unique
[14:43] relationship with Mr. Robinson and
[14:45] they're they um would certainly abide by
[14:49] any orders the court makes concerning
[14:54] um disclosure of what is discussed in
[14:57] closed session but obviously it's up to
[14:59] the court.
[14:59] >> Thank you Mr. Novak. I'm going to rule
[15:02] that uh they will be excluded as well.
[15:04] It is just given the nature and the
[15:06] sensitivity of it I believe it is
[15:09] appropriate to treat all parties in all
[15:11] in the public equally. though I do
[15:12] recognize uh their relationship with Mr.
[15:16] Robinson.
[15:17] >> So, this is really interesting because
[15:18] we had been told that Tyler Robinson's
[15:20] parents played a role in turning him in,
[15:22] but now they're apparently in court to
[15:24] support him. Most families would support
[15:26] their loved one going through something
[15:28] like this. But we don't know if this
[15:30] means that they believe he's in fact
[15:32] innocent or not. Tyler Robinson appears
[15:35] to get along well with his lawyers. They
[15:37] have mentioned in some court documents
[15:39] that they don't want cameras in the
[15:40] courtroom. And this kind of reminds me
[15:42] of Brian Cobberger's lawyers, another
[15:45] high-profile death penalty defendant who
[15:48] later pleaded guilty. Cobberger's
[15:50] lawyers also asked that he appear in
[15:52] street clothes at hearings, and they won
[15:53] that motion. But I don't think that's
[15:55] uncommon. I've seen that request granted
[15:57] in a number of high-profile cases over
[16:00] the years. Now, back to court after that
[16:02] closed session. We're going back on the
[16:04] record in case 25143576,
[16:08] State of Utah versus Tyler James
[16:10] Robinson. I note the presence of council
[16:13] that previously entered their
[16:14] appearances.
[16:16] Uh we have come out of the closed
[16:18] session and uh concluded that business.
[16:21] However, uh the court became aware of an
[16:26] event that happened before
[16:38] And my understanding was during the open
[16:43] uh portion of this hearing earlier that
[16:46] there was a violation of the standing
[16:49] decorum order as it relates to
[16:52] transmission of these proceedings.
[16:55] Uh, I want to hear from council and and
[16:58] then I will make a ruling concerning
[17:01] that.
[17:01] >> So, this was a big deal. This was the
[17:04] first hearing where Tyler Robinson
[17:05] appeared in person in the courtroom in
[17:08] plain clothes and the media had been
[17:10] ordered to not show Tyler Robinson's
[17:13] restraints. Robinson's lawyers asked
[17:15] that the TV camera be removed.
[17:17] >> Um, it is our position, the defense
[17:20] position, that there has been a
[17:21] violation of the decorum order. It is
[17:24] our understanding that those live
[17:26] streaming this uh signed and declared
[17:30] that they would follow the decorum order
[17:32] and they violated it. So we are
[17:34] requesting a sanction. We believe these
[17:36] court's orders are binding and they need
[17:39] to be respected. Um we also believe that
[17:42] it threatens my client's right to a fair
[17:44] trial. It's the whole reason we filed a
[17:47] motion in the first place to remove his
[17:49] shackles. It's our understanding that
[17:52] his shackles are visible. It is also our
[17:55] understanding that potentially some
[17:57] audio from council table was heard. Um
[18:01] we are definitely taking more measures
[18:04] on our own to ensure that that does not
[18:07] happen again. But there has also been
[18:09] some filming of computers and materials
[18:12] at council's desk. That's entirely
[18:15] inappropriate. And I think everybody in
[18:18] this room will agree that's entirely
[18:20] inappropriate. So, we are asking for
[18:23] some remedial measures here. We're
[18:24] asking for it to terminate for today.
[18:27] Um, and we can proceed after that.
[18:29] >> Now, the attorney for the media argued
[18:31] to keep the cameras in the courtroom.
[18:33] >> This is the first time that we've heard
[18:35] about the violation. We've not had an
[18:37] opportunity to look at the video or
[18:39] investigate the audio or look at the the
[18:42] capture of the computers, but filming of
[18:46] the uh the inadvertent filming of the
[18:48] shackles. I did talk to the pool
[18:50] photographer. My understanding is that
[18:52] there was a zoom out shot that did
[18:55] inadvertently uh show the shackles. That
[18:57] was improper. Uh that was inadvertent.
[19:01] Um and we apologize for that. Um they've
[19:04] taken measures to make sure that the
[19:06] pool video that is disseminated to the
[19:09] rest of the pool does not contain any
[19:12] capture of the defendant in the
[19:14] shackles.
[19:14] >> Judge Graph showed a lot of grace and he
[19:17] allowed the camera to stay in the
[19:18] courtroom despite the violation.
[19:20] >> This court does have the right and will
[19:23] exercise termination of broadcast of
[19:26] these proceedings. and and and I I
[19:29] simply want to put all parties on notice
[19:32] to the press to all parties that this
[19:35] court takes this very seriously. While
[19:37] the court believes in openness and
[19:39] transparency, it needs to be balanced
[19:42] with the constitutional rights of all
[19:44] parties in this case. As such, we will
[19:48] take a brief recess to allow the
[19:50] relocation of the camera. Then the
[19:52] prosecutor asks that the publicity order
[19:54] in the case, we would usually call it a
[19:56] gag order, be clarified in
[19:59] >> so in other words, the prosecution team.
[20:01] And there's no rule or case law or
[20:05] statute that expands the prosecution's
[20:07] duties beyond um that group, the
[20:10] prosecution team. So um with respect to
[20:17] clarity, we're seeking clarity as to
[20:20] what exactly does the court mean by
[20:22] witnesses. And we think the court just
[20:25] means the prosecution team because if
[20:28] the that term stretches beyond just the
[20:31] prosecution team, then the order is
[20:33] written uh we don't believe is a a valid
[20:36] and lawful order because
[20:40] it would result in a prior restraint on
[20:43] certain speech and at the very least
[20:46] would have a chilling effect on that
[20:48] speech. Judge Graph says that the
[20:50] prosecution is claiming that there are
[20:52] apparently 3,000 lay witnesses to the
[20:55] assassination in this case.
[20:58] >> Due to the potential confusion, this
[21:00] court grants the state's motion and
[21:03] offers the following clarification.
[21:06] The word witness, as used in this order,
[21:09] applies to all witnesses who are part of
[21:11] the prosecution and defense teams. This
[21:15] includes any witness, including lay
[21:17] witnesses, whom the prosecution or
[21:20] defense has a good faith belief will be
[21:23] called to testify at a hearing or trial.
[21:27] The court also clarifies that the
[21:29] publicity order as written regulates the
[21:33] behavior of attorneys who are associated
[21:35] with the defense team or the Utah County
[21:38] Attorney's Office. It requires the
[21:40] attorneys to abide by rule 3.6. Six. And
[21:44] in order to deter non- attorneys from
[21:47] making prejuditial statements, requires
[21:50] the attorneys to inform witnesses about
[21:53] the prohibitions in the publicity order.
[21:56] Informing witnesses about the
[21:57] prohibitions in the publicity order is a
[22:00] necessary step. Informing witnesses
[22:03] about the prohibitions in the publicity
[22:05] order is a necessary step toward not
[22:08] intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly
[22:10] permitting witnesses from making
[22:12] prejuditial statements. The publicity
[22:14] order does not regulate the behavior of
[22:17] any person who is not an attorney
[22:20] associated with this case. And this
[22:23] order will be signed today by myself and
[22:25] made public.
[22:26] >> And there was another issue regarding
[22:28] Charlie Kirk's widow, Erica Kirk. She
[22:31] will apparently be exempt from the gag
[22:33] order.
[22:34] >> Your honor, on behalf of Mr. Robinson,
[22:37] we certainly think it's appropriate for
[22:40] um Mrs. Kirk to be designated as the
[22:44] victim representative if that is the
[22:46] desire of the state. Um just so there
[22:49] can be no doubt that she's afforded all
[22:51] of the rights um assured to her under
[22:54] our our state statutes. And we have no
[22:57] objection to that.
[22:59] >> Thank you. Thank you to all parties.
[23:02] This court will uh [clears throat]
[23:04] recognize Miss Erica Kirk as the
[23:07] designated victim representative in this
[23:10] case.
[23:10] >> The assistant county attorney said that
[23:12] they're working to get discovery to
[23:14] Tyler Robinson's attorneys, but they say
[23:17] that so far they've received nearly
[23:19] 14,000 files from law enforcement and
[23:22] more may be coming. Robinson's lawyer
[23:25] said she wants to see the evidence
[23:27] justifying the prosecution. seeking the
[23:30] death penalty in this case.
[23:31] >> I mean, the county attorney has made a
[23:34] decision, very public decision, to
[23:37] announce their intent to seek death the
[23:40] day that there was an arrest, which
[23:42] means that that obligation to provide us
[23:44] with the probable cause for everything
[23:46] they relied upon to charge applies now
[23:49] to their intent to seek death. And we're
[23:51] nowhere near getting that material. So,
[23:55] that was their decision to release that.
[23:57] Normally that decision is not made until
[23:59] 30 days after a preliminary hearing.
[24:01] They made it in advance and now they've
[24:03] got an obligation to tell me their
[24:05] aggravation and what they've relied on
[24:07] to make this a death penalty case and we
[24:09] have not received that. So I'm waiting.
[24:12] Um but I'm just laying that out there
[24:14] for now.
[24:14] >> So Judge Graph, he's going to issue his
[24:16] decision on whether to release the
[24:18] transcript from those October hearings
[24:20] with redactions or not at the end of
[24:22] this month. And for now, the preliminary
[24:24] hearing is scheduled for 3 days in May
[24:27] of 2026. Tyler Robinson remains in jail
[24:31] held without bail as prosecutors seek
[24:33] the death penalty against him. He has
[24:35] pleaded not guilty to all charges. And
[24:38] that's it for this episode of Crime Fix.
[24:40] I'm Antinet Levy. Thanks so much for
[24:42] being with me. I'll see you back here
[24:43] next time.