Chris Pavlovski Reveals How Charlie Kirk Found Rumble's Headquarters and Became Its First Investor
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Charlie Kirk Reveals How Tik Tok and Young Voters Fueled Trump's Historic Comeback Victory
20:36
Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Discuss Turning Point USA's Mission to Save America from Marxist Indoctrination
13:47
Candace Owens Exposes Congressional Resolution Condemning Her Speech and Rising Threats to First Amendment Freedom
13:39
Chris Pavlovski Reveals How Charlie Kirk Found Rumble's Headquarters and Became Its First Investor
Chris Pavlovski, CEO of Rumble, shares the untold story of Charlie Kirk's foundational role in building the free speech platform. Kirk wasn't just an early investor alongside JD Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy in April 2021, he personally helped Pavlovski find Rumble's Sarasota headquarters, walking through dilapidated offices and declaring one would become "the free speech capital of the world." Unlike typical investors seeking returns, Kirk remained deeply involved in Rumble's mission, never selling his shares and working tirelessly to advance free speech. Pavlovski also addresses the current state of free speech, the hypocrisy surrounding the Jimmy Kimmel-ABC controversy, and why media companies exercising editorial control is fundamentally different from Big Tech censorship. This conversation reveals Kirk's lasting impact on the platform that became the tip of the spear for digital freedom.
Chris Pavlovski, CEO of Rumble, revealed that Charlie Kirk was among the very first investors in Rumble, participating in an April 2021 funding round alongside JD Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy. What distinguished Kirk from other investors was his exceptional level of engagement and commitment to the company's mission. Pavlovski first met Kirk shortly after Dan Bongino joined Rumble in late 2020, and their relationship quickly evolved beyond a typical investor-founder dynamic.
According to Pavlovski, Kirk "was by far the most active and most interested" investor from that early group. While most shareholders focus primarily on returns, Kirk's motivation centered on advancing free speech and ensuring everyone could participate in public dialogue. This distinction would prove critical as Rumble developed into what Pavlovski describes as "the tip of the spear for free speech" during a time when there was no X and no Elon Musk championing digital freedom.
Finding the Free Speech Capital of the World
The story of how Rumble established its Sarasota, Florida headquarters illustrates Kirk's hands-on involvement. Pavlovski's parents had been coming to Longboat Key as Canadian snowbirds for 20 years, and he had fallen in love with the area. As Rumble transitioned from a small company to one experiencing rapid growth in late 2020 and early 2021, Pavlovski recognized that Florida represented the freest state in the country.
When Kirk mentioned he also had a place in Sarasota, the two began searching for office space together. Pavlovski emphasizes how unusual this was: "Think about this—as an investor, most shareholders are just looking for returns on their investment. Charlie wasn't that guy." Kirk didn't need to spend his time touring potential office spaces, but he did it anyway because he believed in Rumble's mission.
The pair eventually walked into a building on Longboat Key that had been severely damaged by a recent hurricane. The space was dilapidated, with tiles on the ground, a roof falling apart, old wooden tables, green carpets, and chairs that looked like they hadn't been updated since the 1970s or 1980s. Despite the condition, Kirk looked around the decrepit boardroom and declared: "Chris, this is going to be the Rumble headquarters. This is going to be the free speech capital of the world."
Pavlovski made the decision on the spot and never looked back. The studio where this conversation took place now sits in that very building that Kirk helped select.
An Investor Unlike Any Other
What makes Kirk's involvement with Rumble particularly noteworthy is that he operated without any official advisory role. He invested in the company, but his ongoing involvement—wandering around looking at buildings, providing strategic advice, coordinating on free speech events—went far beyond what any investor would typically do.
Pavlovski notes that Kirk "never stopped" being involved. They met regularly, talked frequently, and worked together to solve problems and advance Rumble's mission. "Without him, Rumble wouldn't be where it is today," Pavlovski stated. "He really touched this company in a way that I don't think many people know."
Perhaps most telling is that Kirk never sold his shares in the company, according to Pavlovski's recollection from their conversations. While other investors might have cashed out as the company grew, Kirk held onto his stake because his investment was never about financial returns—it was about doing something great for America and advancing the cause of free speech.
Rumble as the Original Free Speech Warrior
Pavlovski emphasized an important historical context that often gets overlooked: during Rumble's early growth period, it was the only platform genuinely defending free speech. "There was no X, there was no Elon. Rumble was the tip of the spear for free speech and Charlie knew that," he explained.
The company did something no other platform was doing at the time, standing up for the First Amendment when major platforms like Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook were actively censoring political dialogue. Kirk recognized this unique position and committed himself to supporting it.
The Current State of Free Speech
When asked about the state of free speech following Kirk's death, Pavlovski offered a sobering assessment: "We have to understand that free speech is always going to be under attack. The truth is always going to be under attack. People that stand for freedom and freedom of expression are going to be under attack."
He stressed that defending free speech requires bravery and strength, not passivity. "We're not going to have free speech by just sitting around and not doing anything. We're going to have to fiercely defend it."
The Jimmy Kimmel-ABC Controversy and Free Speech Hypocrisy
Pavlovski expressed particular frustration with the response to ABC's firing of Jimmy Kimmel, which many Democrats characterized as an infringement on free speech. He drew a sharp distinction between what happened in 2021 with Big Tech censorship and what ABC did with Kimmel.
"There were platforms like Twitter, like YouTube that were out there parading that they were free speech platforms," Pavlovski explained. "Jack Dorsey said numerous times they're defending free speech. They were censoring political dialogue. They weren't censoring incitement and violence. They were censoring political dialogue—conversation about COVID, conversation about an election."
These platforms were censoring millions of people while claiming to uphold free speech principles. That represented genuine First Amendment concerns because social media platforms function as the modern public square—the means by which people communicate with the masses.
In contrast, ABC is a media company that has always exercised editorial control over its content and talent. "They always had the ability to change staff, always had the ability to remove people, put other people in," Pavlovski noted. Whether ABC fired Kimmel due to declining ratings or because of something he said, "they're exercising their free speech and their First Amendment rights by letting someone go on their platform."
Pavlovski argued there's a fundamental difference between Facebook and YouTube, which serve as means of communication to the masses, and a media company like ABC. "If you're not online to be able to communicate to your masses, you can't communicate to your constituents. That's like denying someone buying a cell phone to go call somebody."
Media companies, on the other hand, exercise their own First Amendment rights through their editorial choices. "When you're talking about a media company like ABC who literally censors and does whatever they want because it's their free speech to exercise whatever they want to say—that's their First Amendment right."
Pointing Out the Double Standard
Pavlovski found it particularly irritating that Democrats were claiming ABC's decision violated free speech when "Fox News was removing talent left and right from their network over the last five years. So was CNN. So was every other company out there that's like a media company."
He referenced a meme circulating online showing what Kimmel said when ABC fired Roseanne Barr for a single tweet, despite her being celebrated by the left at the time. Kimmel had essentially argued that people have a responsibility to say the right thing and that employers can hire or fire anyone. "It's hypocritical," Pavlovski said. "It's so disingenuous. That's the part that bothers me."
Kirk had defended what the First Amendment truly means and how it should be used. Democrats were now trying to conflate a media company changing staff with First Amendment infringement. "No, no, no. It is exactly the exercising of the First Amendment to change your staff in your own entity. Every entity has its right to its own free speech however they want to speak."
As Pavlovski put it, contrary to what Congressman Eric Swalwell suggested, "no one has a right to a TV show. You have a right to speak freely, but not to a TV show."
An Open Platform with Clear Boundaries
When asked the straightforward question of whether Jimmy Kimmel could open an account on Rumble and do his show there, Pavlovski's answer was equally straightforward: "He's welcome to open an account on Rumble, and he can do his show there, but he has to stay within the terms of service, which is not incite violence, and that's what it's all about."
This response encapsulates Rumble's approach to free speech—an open platform with minimal restrictions focused solely on preventing incitement to violence, not on censoring political dialogue or unpopular opinions. It's the vision that Charlie Kirk helped build from those early days when he and Pavlovski walked through a hurricane-damaged building and saw the future headquarters of the free speech capital of the world.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.