Up Next
Candace Owens Exposes Disturbing Questions Surrounding Charlie Kirk Assassination and Erika Kirk's Suspicious Behavior
21:05
Andrew Wilson and Candace Owens Clash Over Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk Assassination Evidence
3:11:07
Candace Owens Breaks Internet With Hunter Biden Interview and Questions Erika Kirk CEO Video Authenticity
51:07
Dangster Intel Lays Out a Timeline of Inconsistencies in Erika Kirk's Statements Since Charlie Kirk's Death
In this lengthy livestream debrief, a host who goes by Dangster Intel walks through a self-described evidence-based timeline of statements and decisions made by Erika Kirk and Turning Point USA since Charlie Kirk's assassination, framing it explicitly as his own interpretation rather than proven fact. He opens by addressing a coordinated online backlash against Candace Owens ahead of her new series, 'Bride of Charlie,' including a leaked memo and allegations involving commentator Graham Allen. He then focuses on what he calls a small but revealing lie: Erika Kirk telling a CBS town hall she had never dated before Charlie Kirk, which he contrasts with archived social media photos, a 2014 reality show audition tape with an ex-boyfriend, and footage of her drinking on a separate reality program. He analyzes the speed of her appointment as Turning Point USA's CEO eight days after the assassination using a trading analogy to argue the transition looked pre-arranged.
Addressing the Backlash Against Candace Owens
Danks opens by revisiting a coordinated online campaign targeting Candace Owens ahead of the release of her new series, 'Bride of Charlie,' including what he describes as a leaked memo instructing recipients to flood social media with messaging branding Owens as 'evil' and 'demonic' and to amplify commentator Graham Allen's posts. He references a separate video, which he says he has not personally verified but finds credible, from a man claiming to have served alongside Graham Allen who alleges troubling past behavior, and frames the overall backlash as a coordinated messaging operation rather than organic criticism, while stressing that he is presenting this as his own assessment.
Danks's Framing of His Own Reporting
Danks repeatedly stresses that his commentary is based on what he describes as sourced documents, financial filings, and previously reported information, distinguishing his approach from speculation, while still acknowledging in places that some of what he discusses is his own interpretation rather than confirmed fact.
A CBS Town Hall Statement and Contradicting Footage
Danks focuses on a December CBS News town hall in which he says Erika Kirk stated she had never dated before Charlie Kirk and did not drink alcohol. He contrasts this with what he describes as publicly archived photos showing her with previous boyfriends, a 2014 audition tape for the reality show 'The Amazing Race' featuring her, under her maiden name Erica Frantzve, with an ex-boyfriend identified as JT Massie, and broadcast footage from a reality show he identifies as 'Summer House' showing her drinking alcohol. He argues that the specific content of these claims matters less than the fact that they were stated as flatly untrue on national television, and that this reflects a broader pattern in his view of building an image rather than candidly representing her past.
Analyzing the Speed of the CEO Transition
Drawing on his background as a trader, Danks argues that the lack of friction, dissent, or delay in Turning Point USA's decision to name Erika Kirk CEO eight days after Charlie Kirk's death resembles a financial transaction with no slippage, which he says typically indicates a position established in advance of an event rather than a reaction to it. He explicitly frames this as a pattern he is noticing rather than a proven conclusion, while contrasting the eight-day timeline with the months-long transitions typical of large nonprofit organizations and Fortune 500 companies after a sudden leadership loss.
The Leaked Internal Zoom Call
Danks describes a leaked recording of an internal staff Zoom call held six days after Charlie Kirk's death, in which he says Erika Kirk discussed memorial attendance figures of 275,000 people, $200,000 in merchandise sales, and described the memorial as 'the event of the century.' He argues the tone of this private call, which he says was leaked by Candace Owens, sounded markedly more unguarded and businesslike than her public appearances, while explicitly cautioning that grief takes many forms and that he is not attempting to dictate how anyone should mourn.
Contrasting Statements on Forgiveness
Danks contrasts Erika Kirk's statement at Charlie Kirk's public memorial at State Farm Stadium, in which she said she forgave the person responsible for the shooting, with a later comment she made in a November interview with Megyn Kelly, in which she said anything she could wish on the person responsible would pale in comparison to the justice of God. He argues these two statements are difficult to reconcile, while also acknowledging that forgiveness is a central tenet of Christian faith and that his critique applies to the apparent inconsistency between the two statements rather than to forgiveness as a concept. He notes that, as of this video, Tyler Robinson had not yet been tried and no evidence had been presented in court.
An Unfinished Debrief
Danks states he was unable to complete the full timeline he intended to cover in this stream due to time constraints, and tells viewers he plans to continue the debrief the following day before Candace Owens' own series premiere.
Video Transcript
Oh yeah. Follow me through the for you. change yourself. Don't take my word. Why you get to the bone? Heat. Heat. Feel the truth. Oh, the roof. He's a fact. President Trump says that Kirk has died after he was shot from a nearby building >> after being shot at Utah Valley University. >> The great and even legendary Charlie Kirk is dead. >> The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry. pain to give him a kiss. Goodbye. >> That young man, I forgive him. >> Take your time. >> Erica Kirk has been named the new CEO of Turning Point USA. >> My husband's dead. Like, I'm not trying to be morbid, but he's dead. >> It's weird to say excited. >> Describes her husband's funeral as the event of the century. Merch hats. We have 50,000 plus hat orders. >> Nobody knows why she's out there in a glittering pants suit in a recreated tent that her her husband tragically was murdered in throwing merch out. >> Everyone grieavves differently. So if someone's acting weird, don't read into that. >> Zionists, the prime minister of Israel, all lied through their teeth about Charlie Kirk. Her operation was in Constant, the epicenter of Romania's trafficking scandal. >> We are conversations to have with a 15-year-old. I'm going to touch your butt. >> $ 8.6 million to their own shell company. What is going on? >> We have nothing to hide. >> My aunt used to tell me, "Never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper." Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. It is your boy, the original Dangster, the American Dangster, the only Dangster. But you're all Dangsters. So, welcome back. Today, we're going to do a start to now. Basically going through the timeline of what's led us to how we got here. Um, and I'm basically gonna do a lot of what I've been doing, which is pull receipts or just explain the receipts and I'm going to go through today's dangster debrief sharing what I believe to be how we got here. So, buckle in, strap in because I'm going to tell you a story like I always do and um we're going to get right to it. Super chats will be read after the debrief. It's going to be a long one, so we're going to go and enjoy. Become a member for 99 cents if you want to be a member and a dangster or danket. And uh you can join us for Friday members only live streams and access the archive. But um but yeah, welcome to anybody who's new. I know that there are a lot of new members or uh subscribers. Welcome on X and we are streaming on Rumble as well. So I'm going to take you through this story. It's not a conspiracy theory, not a hot take really. It's no like, you know, random introduction. I think we all, if we're here, we know exactly what's going on, right? We've seen the story unfold. um before our eyes and it's on my end I've built my entire story on documentation on evidence that I believe to create not my myself in particular but multiple people looking in finances uh with Candace looking at the lies that she's been told and has caught people in lies these strange activities around people um but I've also build my end around government files, form90s. Um, you know, so I try to stay in my lane, but you know, I'm going to tell you this slowly today because this story does not work if I rush it and it's hard to fit everything in one video live stream. I don't know when Candace is going live. I'm sure many of you are waiting anticipantly for her show today. Uh but and that show would be The Bride of Charlie, which I believe comes out today. So a docu series, The Bride of Charlie by Candace Owens. And as you can see, the last 48 to 72 hours, the the um the people, I want to say bots, but there are people involved have been deployed. Um, every major voice that's against her has decided in unison again that you are not allowed to ask questions about Erica Kirk, about the death of Charlie Kirk, about TPUSA and all the things regarding that, which I find quite interesting for sure. Um, Ben Shapiro called it evil. Megan McCain called uh, she said pure unadulterated [ __ ] evil. Laura Loomer said depraved harassments. Steve De called it the most wicked and satanic thing from the online right? Eric Mntaxis well said, "Could Candace Owens be more despicable?" Graham Allen has become or tried to become part of this relevancy for himself. Um, if you've seen my timeline on X, someone had posted a video two hours long explaining an entire story, which I'm looking to possibly get him on the stream, talk to him. But in in general, you might want to go to my channel on X and see the post and what he said about Graham Allen because doesn't look good for Graham. And I'm not here to try to spread false information. the information is it seems very credible. It would be almost impossible for someone to create a story like that. So, if you haven't seen it, uh you know, Graham, if you're watching, bro, you said you have no skeletons in your closet. And when you say that, you might want to make sure that's true because when you hurt people in the past and you do things that, you know, I'm not saying it's true or not, but if if that's the case, those I would consider skeletons. Um, and also, there's a leaked email. Actually, before I get into this, let me show you the level that we're talking about here of attack. I posted it uh from Swords Truth. Who got it from someone else? Who got it from someone else? Uh here, let me add this to the stage and you can see. So, this is on my timeline. Leak coordinated attack against real Candace Owens led by Graham Allen. This is an email and wouldn't have expected anything less, just more proof that they literally need bots to try to tank credibility by someone who just wants the truth. So, this is from Sword Truth. And then I guess he got it from here, but I'll just show this is what it says, right? So, I'm going to actually open in a new tab so we can look in nicely here. So, I don't know if this like how where this came from, but it ended up being uh sent out. This is how I understand it. Let me read the original. So, it says, "Email got leaked of their coordinated attack. Crazy how they coordinate against real Candace Owens. Also hilarious. They told everyone to tag these accounts for extended reach. Uh, Cat Turd, Gunther, Engelman, Wells, Jordan, etc. Now, if we look at the email, it says, "Subject urgent. Shut down Candace's latest smear. Action needed tonight." Uh, it doesn't have a date on it, but I would take the assumption that it was uh the day before, maybe on the 23rd, perhaps. This isn't journalism. It's pure evil. Demonic slander against a widow still in mourning, dragging Charlie's name and legacy through the mud for clicks and clout. We've seen her pattern before, but this time it's personal. It's vicious and it has to stop. Talking points verbatim talking points. That's interesting. I don't know how I feel about drinking out of a straw, but whatever. Anyways, use these verbatim or close close variations. Candace Owens is evil. Pure evil. This is demonic. Straight up satanic level attack on a widow and her kids. Candace is a demon obsessed with destroying Charlie's life. How can any real Christian stay silent while she attacks Erica Kirk like this? That's a very interesting sentence. She is not asking questions. She's conducting a witch hunt. Action items. Do this now before it trends further. Quote or reply to this post exposing the trailer and call it out using the language above. Retweet post with the trailer video. High visibility. Amplify the outrage there. Share and quote Graham Allen's strong stand. He's leading the charge. You see that? Look. Share. And quote, "Graham Allen's strong stand. He's leading the charge." What does that mean, Graham? His videos declaring he's coming for everyone responsible. Boost this hard. Post your own version if you have reach. Tag big accounts like cat turd, etc. I told you before. um flood the replies under any Candace defending or neutral post with the demonic evil framing make it impossible to ignore this coordinated push worked against her before. It can bury this trailer before episode one even drops it. It's that's so foolish to think that they could do that. Like it only amplifies it. It's the same thing when you're talking about stopping a specific uh agenda, right? Say there's a like a country for perhaps Boston. Ask somebody in the chat. But say uh you're you're creating this outrage from the Boston side to Americans and saying that like whenever you amplify something and say to stop doing it, it only gets worse. And that's the thing that I feel like they don't understand whether this is real or not. I mean, I have I have no reason to not believe it because I've seen it with my own eyes and I've seen Ryan Mata actually go and show the websites that they have these targeted accounts and then they have a post that they requ. So, for example, this might have $50,000 in an account and if you hit a million views, they'll give you 10 bucks or whatever. It's like not a lot of money. Now, if it's 50,000 bucks and you get all the impressions cuz they want certain amount of impressions, then you get all the money. So, people are rushing to get this x amount of money. I'm not saying this is true for this, but I know that it happens. This is verified, okay? You know, I I I talk about verified information here on this channel. If you don't know me and you're new here, you must understand that I am about the receipts. I'm about true information. This is for me. This right here is is unverified only because I don't see who it's coming from. It says CU team. Um but the thing is I've seen this before. So it's a little bit of speculation from my end, but I I have seen this in action and we've all seen it. They come out, they attack, etc. This coordinated push will work against her. So on so forth. If you're in, hit reply within and we'll loop you into the next update. It would have been interesting to see the rest of it. So, uh, for Charlie, for Erica, for the kids, for what's left of decency on our side, stay strong, Ford only, do not reply all. So, this is some pretty strong proof. And then before I go with my debrief, I'll go back and I'll read you the post that I made that's picking up pace here on, let me see. from Graham Allen's old buddy. So, this is a video from YouTube. You can see it's got 33,000 views right now. I posted it last night. And it says, "A man who claims to have served with Graham Allen and the 23rd unit of the National Guard." He says they grew up in the same hometown. He's not anonymous. He's putting his face and name to this and what triggered it. And so I'm not going to read the whole thing because I got a lot to go through, but essentially he asks he wants Candace Owens to see this video. He wants her to investigate Graham's history in their hometown. He wants people to go watch Candace's actual clips and compare them to what Graham has said. And the man himself has a home in Florida Keys, works for a utility company, built everything himself with no help. Now, backstory, and if you want, um, you could just go to my page and you can go check it out. It's It's right there. And it has the YouTube channel. Now, this channel has only, if I push it here, got hardly any followers. When I first found it, it had like three, like maybe 50 views or something. Now, it's got 25,000 and they had hardly any subscribers. So, this person wants their message out. It's getting out. Okay. It's two hours long. And if you watch this story, he worked with him and allegedly worked with Graham in the National Guard or the Army or whatnot and tells a pretty disturbing story about Graham basically turning his back on him multiple times. And this is the person that's now trying to come out and attack somebody who's just looking for truth. This person, from what I see, is a good person. He's really telling his story and I think it's interesting. I I highly encourage after this live stream to go check it out. So that being said, um, and it's crazy because this feels like this all as soon as you put out that video, the one minute trailer that I showed you within like a few hours, same cycle, same framework, we've all seen it. Now, I've been doing this long enough to know the difference between organic outrage and a coordinated messaging operation. When five different people on five different platforms land on the same word at the same time or same time frame with the same emotional temperature pointed at the same target, that is not independent thinkers reaching the same conclusion. That is a tree. It's a phone tree. That's talking points memos like you saw in the email or the alleged email that I showed you. That is a response framework designed to make you feel like asking questions is an act of cruelty. Look, I don't think that this would have been such a big explosion of a conversation if Erica didn't become the CEO now of Turning Point USA. Now I've come to my multiple reasons possibly why it's my handle is the same as my YouTube channel Dangster uh Dangster Intel. Now um these talking points, this framework, the act of cruelty to ask questions, I don't think would have been as intense. But again, when you look at the form 9990 showing GGLF life insurance policy paying out tens of millions of dollars, the stranges behind that, if you haven't seen, go on my channel after this in the videos and look at the insurance policy. That's a very interesting situation because it shows form 990 that TPUSA gave a loan of $350,000 to open a private life insurance uh for Charlie Kirk's private company. And then the I don't know. I mean, you got to go watch it because the person who claims a life insurance or who owns a policy to how I see it, it says president or CEO of Turning Point USA, it doesn't say Charlie Kirk. Now, it could just mean Charlie Kirk in a in a way written on form 9990s. I'm not an IRS auditor, but it you should check out the video for sure. Uh but everything that I claim is sourced you know or or has been verified to most extents. Um and it's not cruel to ask questions about a 100 plus million 200 300 500 I don't know however many half a billion dollar company that's taxexempt subsidized by American taxpayers. you, me, my family, everybody in it, and all of yours, and everybody in it. We all I mean, whoever I, you know, it's subsidized, taxexempt, taking in hundreds of millions of dollars, and you've got the likes of companies like Stacy Sheridan's company, you've got Olympic Media taking 75 73.4% of the donation as a commission. Stacy Sheridan doing strange things with commissions on being while being paid as an employee to raise money. So there's a lot of interesting things happening there. It's not cruel to read government filings out loud. It's not cruel to notice when a story when a person really well when an actually when a narrative doesn't add up. So, while the rest of the internet picks sides today, like what? Shapiro vers Candace or Graham verse Candace or Erica verse the world or vice versa. I'm just going to do what I always do and read you what I know, tell you what I know. And every claim that I make again is sourced. So, and if it's not something that I've sourced personally, it's information that you should know about or that you have seen in the past. not you should know about like me delivering it to you but you should already know about it. So I want to start with something small because in my experience studying documents studying organizations studying the way people who have something to hide actually behave in a different certain way. Right? The small things are really the most diagnostic. the small lies you tell more about you can tell more about a person and the big ones are almost it's strange it's almost like the small lies are bigger than the big lies in my eyes because big lies require a lot of planning uh sometimes more people big lies require infrastructure big lies get workshipped and polished and run through lawyers but small lies small lies are reflective you It's almost like they come from the gut. They are the factory setting. They are the place a person goes when the truth is mildly inconvenient and they don't even think about how they're telling it. So, let's start with a small lie. December of last year, believe it's December, Erica Kirk sits down for CBS News Town Hall, which is national television. And it wasn't a podcast. It's not a quick social media hit. This was CBS. All right, we know who owns CBS, right? So, millions of people were watching, cameras everywhere, a moderated conversation broadcast to the country. And the host asks about her life before Charlie. And the simple question really was asked like who you were before Charlie. The question of pretty much every public figure gets asked. The kind of question that has a simple true answer, typically maybe a few sentences or small paragraph. Erica Kirk looks into the camera and says that she never dated. She says she watched her roommate date and that it was very strange. Or she says that she doesn't drink. She represents herself on national television as a woman who went straight from her parents house to Charlie Kirk's arms. No detours, no history, no past. the per the perfect traditional wife, pride wife, the woman who stood on stages across the country and called boss babe culture antithetical to the gospel. Beautiful story, beautiful image of that person. The kind of narrative that makes donors open up their checkbooks and makes evangelical audiences fall in love. Except the internet remembers things. It's actually undefeated. The internet is undefeated. We all know that. Um, and honestly, I I hate to see it because now what we're seeing is Erica Kirk couldn't do anything right when she when all of this started unfolding in the beginning. Erica Kirk can't do anything right now because now it looks like she's grieving and everyone's tearing her apart. I took part in that because, and it wasn't uh I'm not slandering her. I'm saying, "Hey, you went on stage in front of high school minors with the mission of TPUSA spreading information about values of an American and like when it comes to financial, free markets, like you know, the Constitution, understanding, she went to a history event and sobbed on stage about her personal life to minors." Okay, I have an issue with that. whatever else people want to say. Was she drunk? Was she intoxicated? Was she high on drugs? That's not for me to say. Definitely didn't look like she was in a good place. But I don't like to see people struggle like that. However, this is what has come of a small lie. You see how this works? It's a cascade. It's progressive. Within hours of that CBS appearance, though, Tik Tockers pulled up photos from Erica's own social media accounts. Not leaked photos, not hacked photos. her accounts public archived cash you know cached or whatever pulled up from either she probably I'm sure she deleted a lot of things but again you have the archive photos of her with multiple ex-boyfriends videos dating photos relationship photos engage engagement photos with at least one other man the evidence was not hidden it was not buried it was sitting right there on the internet waiting for anyone with the search bar to find it. And then someone found that audition tape, right? You remember the audition tape? I think we all remember that, right? I might pull some of this up after. So, a full audition tape in 2014, I believe it was, for the Amazing Race. And in the video, it's she's Erica Fronie, her maiden name, and her then boyfriend JT Massie filmed an audition for Bravo's reality show, The Amazing Race, and it's on video. You can watch it right now. I think Project Constitution posted it. Um, yeah, I think he was the first one to post it in the video. She's fun. She's energetic. She's outgoing. She's wearing clothes that you don't scream exactly as a tradife, but relax and chill. And she's clearly obviously undeniably in a relationship with the man when she said she hadn't dated anyone. Like, that's just crazy to me. There's a a prominent YouTuber, Boch, if you know who I'm talking about. Boge bge balin. Uh there's an interesting perspective when it comes to was she MK. It would tell a lot. It would explain a lot if she was MK. I'll tell you that cuz it's really interesting to watch someone lie about things that are so easy to find. But um and even and at one point actually in that tape she turns to the camera, looks right into the lens and says, quote, "Sex sells, babe. sex cells and he's pulling his shirt down, you know, and the drinking thing. She appeared on I believe it was Summerhouse season something, season 3, maybe in 2018. There's broadcast footage of her holding a glass and it's not water. Looks like an alcoholic beverage. I think even ordering another cocktail maybe in the same show. Now, let me be very clear about something. This is not a crime and nobody cares. Nobody cares about that. Absolutely not. People date, people drink, people audition for reality shows, people change, people grow, people are allowed to be one person at 25 and a different person at 30. I have changed dramatically. If you know me personally or even been around long enough, you know how much my life has changed in the last two decades, multiple times. I'm not a morality policeman, okay? I'm the last person probably that should be. Um, I have no interest in that actually. What someone did at a Bravo casting a decade ago in isolation or whatever on public TV, it's none of my business personally. But here's what is my business is, and here is what makes this small to big is that she lied about it. It's kind of a big lie that maybe it was small in her head. I I don't understand how she came to that that lie. I don't I I just don't get it. Um but she lied about it on national television to millions of people as a Christian or or claimed Christian while running a$und00 million organization to build a specific image. That's what I think. the image of a grieving wife, grieving widow, a pure woman, a dutiful partner and and mother, the woman who was only ever with Charlie Kirk. And when the receipts came out, she didn't address it. No correction, no I misspoke or I made a mistake, you know, or I forgot or I'm sorry I like we she people must understand we are humans. We are very forgiving, understanding people. I am. We all We're all cool, man. You can do whatever. You can say and do whatever. We could find You could watch a video of you snorting a line of blow and no one would care if you were honest about it and said, "I changed my life." I'm telling you 100%. I guarantee you almost everybody in there, there's 4,000 people watching on YouTube. I guarantee you if I put up a poll right now here, I'll do it right now. I want people to please be honest. This is important. If Erica Kirk were honest about anything in the past, would you have for forgiven any acts we've seen? Yes or no? That's it. The poll is up. 4,000 people uh view 4,000 views, I'm sorry, 1100 viewers currently. Be honest, please. That's the only way this works because I believe that to be true. I would forgive you at least. But when you lie about it, um it's almost like as if the photos were never taken, the audition tape had not been there uh or ever filmed. Why? Why would someone lie about something so easy to disprove? Something that's so small in reality, something to that that seems so insignificant in the grand scheme of things. And that telling the truth would have cost her absolutely nothing. I dated before Charlie. I lived a normal life. I partied a little bit and then I met the love of my life. That's a better story. That's a more relatable story. probably would have gotten you more donations. That's a story that helps her, not hurts her. I think that uh Baron Coleman, he hit something pretty good with the whole uh sheep dipping potential potential situation. So, why lie? I've sat with this question for a couple months now, maybe longer. uh September, October, November, December, January, February, five months, five and a half months. So, I keep coming back to two possible answers. There's a few others, but either she is accustomed to controlling the narrative that she has lost the ability to control and also lost the ability to distinguish between what is true and what is useful. That's one. the truth and you know the brand have merged in her mind and she genuinely cannot tell the difference anymore. And when you lie so many times about so many different things, perhaps you have multiple different timelines in your head for some whatever reason. This could possibly be another reason. Or I guess maybe lying is the default setting. It's the factory configuration. It's the way that she operates in totality. It could be that say whatever the moment requires, whatever lands best with the audience in the room. Whatever builds that image, and if the truth contradicts the image, the truth gets cut. Like and subscribe if you haven't already. Let me uh remove this down here. Make sure you hit the like and subscribe button. And I don't know which answer is correct to be honest, but I but I know both of them should be concerning. At least it is to me because this is not a woman running a podcast or a blog. This is the CEO of TurningPoint USA, a multiund million dollar taxexempt organization funded by donors that qualify for tax deductions because the IRS trusts the people running these organizations to be honest stewards. Not only that, Turning Point USA is opening thousands of chapters and being almost, I guess, forced or required to be in all of these public schools and colleges across the entire country. Not only that, they're working with show faith by works, which is geo fencing over 300 churches using generative engine optimization to manipulate AI large language model engines to make them uh the congregant actually be completely tracked, traced, hopped, and identified and thrown into a social AI algorithm. But besides that, it's a taxexempt organization. So if she lies about whether she dated, what else has she lied about? Right? That is the question. And the question is the foundation of everything that's unfolded since Charlie's death. There's so much there's so much. You know this every single thing sits on top of each other. So it's very hard to forget it. There's a lot of things that we might have forgotten, but there's don't do not let bigger revelations later when I'm going to talk to you about everything here in this debrief make you think that one small lie doesn't matter because it starts there and it cascades from that. It matters more than all of them because it tells you who you're dealing with. small eyes are the biggest ones at the end because it's almost like opening Pandora's box once you open it. Okay? Just like the files, you tell people you're going to release the files. H So, a small lie or a small we give them a little bit. We'll just say we're going to do the whole thing and then we'll just not do the rest. That's Pandora's box, bro. I got to take the straw out. This is killing me. This metal thing here. So again, what has she lied about? So let's go to September 10th, 2025 at Utah Valley University in Oram, Utah. A Tuesday evening, Charlie Kirk is giving a speech on the American Comeback Tour. No, on the Prove Me Wrong tour. whatever it is. I don't know. Prove me wrong. Tent at least. Uh there's I think 3,000 people in the audience. A standard campus event for a man who had done hundreds of them, maybe thousands. This is what Charlie Kirk did. He traveled the country, stood on stages at universities, and talked to young people about conservative values. It was his life's work. Charlie Kirk was was shot. What they said is he was shot from a single shot from a rooftop 142 yards away. Hits him right in the neck. Charlie is pronounced dead at the hospital. It gets blasted all over social media. Most people saw it on X First. Pretty gruesome. The nation becomes in shock. Uh I saw Jesse on fire's face live. It was shocking to say the least when he when I saw his face and then when I saw what I saw. Uh there was a lot of interactions and engagements like that. And what's crazy is I haven't seen that type of shock from anyone on Charlie's side. Why is that? Like why is that? The nation is in shock. Influencers see it live. They're in shock crying. And we haven't seen a true what I feel most people feel. We haven't seen a real tear come out of anyone's eyes on Charlie's teeth or from his family. Maybe his parents, but they're hiding them from us or they're choosing to stay away, which is fine. That's fine. The conservative movement goes into a strange mourn. Um, two small children don't have a father anymore. A man who built one of the most influential polit political organizations in America fold from a folding table gets sniped and basically falls out of his chair, gets pushed out of his chair. uh which is fine I guess because if you're going to want to get somebody off the chair but not to get into the details uh essentially someone who shook the hand of every president since Obama you know he's pretty mobilizing figure or controversial or or active um but he also mobilized an entire generation of young conservatives and he was dead at 31 assassinated and it was at a campus speech. And I want to sit with that for a moment because everything that I'll tell you here happens in the shadow of that event. And we cannot we must not lose sight of the gravity of it. A man was killed. Children lost their father. The children lost their father. A mother lost her son. So on and so forth. Whatever you think of Charlie Kirk's politics, whatever you think of Turning Point USA, whatever conclusions you draw by the end of this debrief, that is the human reality at the center of this story. Now, there's other narratives being carved and I think it's important that everyone looks into them. I think Jesse on Fire has done a great job putting out his playlist of his perspective. Baron has done a great job. Candace obviously she's, you know, doing her side of basically unfolding a lot of information about Hala VFT. There's a lot of people working on this because we care, right? This is an American citizen citizen assassinated on American grounds. And it's just crazy that they don't understand how much we care and they're calling it slander or they're calling it evil or demonic or satanic. I need you to understand the scale of of this, right? This is a a multiund million dollar organization that staffs hundreds of people. It operates thousands of campuses across college and high schools in the country. Excuse me. It hosted events sitting with United States presidents. Donald Trump helped Trump get elected. It was by revenue and by reach by political influence one of the most powerful conservative institutions in America. And in eight days, the entire thing changed hands. No public search, no interview process, no consideration of alternative candidates. No outside consultants brought in to make decisions. No executive head hunters engaged. No, at least from what we hear, nobody said anything. It was just like bam, bam, bam, Eric Kirk, CEO. Let's run it. Let's go. The hell is that, bro? That is crazy. TPUSA's official statement said Charlie had previously expressed this wish for her to become this, you know, go from a stay-at-home mom. The woman who publicly championed submitting her husband in all things, the woman who built a brand in the idea that a woman's place is at home supporting her man and her family, that boss babe culture is antithetical to the gospel. It's her words. that woman, I believe it's her words, that woman who became uh who was that or said she was that became the CEO of the very organization that uh was probably the least expected position to be taken or any without a week to grieve because obviously you don't just become CEO on the eighth day. There's ample stuff going up until that eighth day, okay? Or whatever day it was. I think it's the eighth day. TPUSA, again, their official story said that Charlie Kirk had previously expressed his wish for this. Fine. I'm not disputing that today. Maybe he did. Maybe there was a secession plan on some paper in a drawer somewhere. Lots of organizations have them. Lots of people in high-powered positions have them. It would probably, I would say, be irresponsible not to. But I'm going to ask you to notice a few things about the way that this has played out because the details matter and especially in a situation like this and anyways they always matter. First you have the speed. Eight days for the CEO transition of aundred and whatever million dollar nonprofit with nationwide and even global reach. A Fortune 500 company takes months if not even longer to transition from one to another to get the proper leadership in place after a sudden death. even longer. The average nonprofit board takes weeks of deliberation at a minimum, often with an interim director, somebody that knows the operation while they conduct a proper search for this new CEO. TPUSA somehow did it in 8 days from an assassination to installation. 192 hours. 192 hours. Second, the unanimity unan unanimity you unanimity I guess that's how you say the you know not a single bo basically not a single board member voted against it not a single dissenting voice not a single maybe we should take 30 days to evaluate our options let you chill a little bit every single person in that boardroom looked at the grieving widow with no executive experience apparently I mean from what all we've seen no executive experience running a large organization and she said yes without any hesitation and they all said yes as well. Thirdness of this there's no friction anywhere in this process. No public debate, no internal push back that has ever surfaced. No donor revolt. It's almost like they wanted it like that's what they needed. The staff petition never h there's no staff petition, nothing like that. Erica Kirk walked into the CEO role the same way someone walks through the door that they already have unlocked, like the key was already in her pocket, like the room was already arranged. Speed, unanimity, smoothness. And in my world, when I look at how things move, when a trade executes, I'm I'm a trader, right? I'm a crypto trader and stock investor. When a trade executes with zero friction, when there's no spread, there's no slippage, no hesitation from any party, it means one thing. The position was established before the event. If you can drop, like for example, if you're making it a leverage trade and you want to put a $100 million long to chart for the chart to go up and you just uh market order it, you would hit something called slippage and you would eat all the orders and you would lose money because of it. But this is a smooth order, a smooth transaction. There's no slippage. That means that nobody lost money and it was in fact the most favored position in the book in the spread. So you know there's again the position seems to have been established before the event. The outcome was not a reaction to what happened. It was the plan for what would happen. That's that's how it reads to me. I'm not saying that this is the case here. I am saying I notice a pattern and I'm asking you to hold it in your mind because what comes next makes the speed of that transition look even stranger. Now I told you that there was a vote that happened on the board must have been on September 18th because it was on the 8th day after the assassination. But let me back the clock up two more days because before the vote, before the official transfer of power, something else happened. Um, you know, September 16th, 6 days after Charlie Kirk was murdered, Erica holds a staff Zoom call with TPUSA employees. And I need you to set the stage in your mind. Feel free to examine the weight of this moment in your head if you want. It is a six days. It is six days since the bullet crossed over the air and executed her husband. 6 days since the father of her children were taken from this earth. And she's on a video Zoom call with the staff of his of his organization. He owned this organization. He started it from nothing. That's at least what we're told. The people who worked beside him every day, the people who answered his emails and planned his events and believed in what he was building were there. people who are presumably shattered, people who have not even had time to process what have happened, what has happened. And on that call, Erica Kirk discusses 275,000 memorial attendees. She discusses $200,000 in merchandise sales at the memorial. She talks about media coverage. She talks about the scale and the reach and the impact of this memorial event. And she calls it an event of the century. An event of the century. her husband's memorial, the gathering that happened because a man was murdered, an event of the century, and she was laughing, uh, giggling perhaps, whatever. I need to be careful here because I'm maybe say something that some of you will interpret me as telling someone how to grieve and I want to be very clear that I'm not doing that. People grieve differently. I understand that. I have lost people, too. It's interesting because I woke up this morning thinking about someone that I had lost long time ago. Friend of mine in high school. He had uh self-exited. He was 17 years old. Uh grief is not a straight line. That's not the only person. I've lost other people, but for some reason today, I don't know why. I actually reached out to his brother today. I haven't talked to him in probably a decade, but he came into my mind. It's It's strange now that I'm thinking about it, talking about it in front of over a thousand people, but I miss that. I miss that dude, man. You know, I still grieve a little bit. Today, I grieved. But anyways, people grieve differently. It's not a straight line. It does not follow a script. Some people weep for weeks. Some people go completely numb. Some people throw themselves into logistics and work and task because sitting still with the pain will probably destroy them. or at least they feel that way. And there's really no correct way to mourn. You know, how do you mourn a human being properly? Nobody can tell you that. And I will never stand here and pretend that there is. But there's a difference between coping through work and celebrating revenue. There is a difference between finding strength in logistics and being energized by merchandise numbers. There's a difference between putting one foot in front of the other and laughing about what an amazing event your husband's death created. And on that call, what I heard, what millions of people heard when Candace leaked that audio is not a woman coping. It is a woman operating operating. It is a woman who sounds for the first time in any recording I have ever really heard her or heard of her speak in a more intimate setting like this where there wasn't a show. Uh at least it wasn't supposed to be completely and totally authentic before I saw the Amazing Race video and all that you know this surfaced. So this was not performing of grief in my opinion, not performing composure, not performing the tradife narrative or the grieving widow or any of these other characters, just herself. Happy about the numbers, not to be morbid. Someone on X captured it better than I ever could have. They wrote, "Uh, that is the first time she sounds authentic, being happy about merch at the memorial of her husband. Authentic. That is the word that stuck with me because it implies that everything else, every other public moment, every tear, every somber inter interview, every carefully worded statement, maybe it's not authentic. And if the only time a person sounds real is when they're celebrating merchandise sales at their husband's funeral, what does that tell you about every other moment? And I keep coming back to that small lie. I never dated. She dated. It looks like she dated. She said what the moment required though. She built the image that the room needed to see. And now here she is in a room she thought was private in a moment she thought nobody would ever hear. And the image is not going to surface. The performance is completely off. And what is left underneath is a woman talking about $200,000 in merch sales. this the same way a festival, you know, I was in the rave scene when I was younger as a DJ and it's like the same way I talk to the homies about, damn, bro, did you see how many tickets we sold? We had all these people at the event. The cops didn't show up. Like, it was a blast, man. Last DJ on set was bumping, you know? Like that's what it felt like to me. Obviously different, but not not exactly the same. Nobody had died in my life before that at that time specifically. But it's kind of like that. You know, I've hosted events, many events in the restaurant industry, in the hotel business, in the music industry, in the club industry. I know what that looks like. Now, that was 6 days after her husband's murder. Stack that on top of what I've already showed you so far. and the the dating lies, the Tradife image that has been deconstructed and dismantled and destroyed. CEO in eight days with zero friction and now a leaked Zoom call where the mask slips and what is underneath does not look like grief. The image and the reality aren't matching. That's how it looks. And I need you to hold both of them in your head. the image and the reality because I will give you more to show you where the gap starts to become more of a canyon. Now we move to September 21st. Um we have a memorial we have the state farm stadium uh public service not a small event and I might have my timelines mixed up. You know, I'm hoping that I have everything accurate, but we all know how everything played out. If my timeline is not exact, I apologize. I'll try to keep from giving specific dates, but they had State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, I believe. And this is Charlie's public service. It was a public memorial service. So, not a small event. This is one of the biggest public gatherings in recent American political history. Tens of thousands of people in the stadium. President Donald Trump is there. Vice President JD Vance is there. Senators, Congress members, media, the biggest names in conservative politics. And the media are in the building. The entire country is watching. Erica Kirk takes the stage. And we've seen it. A massive stadium, a grieving nation, spotlights, silence, and a widow. 11 days after her husband's assassination, multiple days after her husband's assassination, two weeks, whatever it is, she delivers the line that brings the entire stadium into a very interesting situation. A very interesting situation. She says, "That man, that young man, I forgive him. I forgive him because it was what Christ did." something like this, right? It's it's like what Charlie would do or what Christ would do. Forgive him, like turn the other cheek, standing ovation, the whole stadium, tears in the crowd, people online, people embracing strangers. It was by any measure one of the most powerful public moments in recent American history. a widow choosing to forgive one of the biggest, you know, assassinations in modern American history on a stage in front of tens of thousands of people, hundreds of thousands, however many, 11 days after or two weeks after the assassination of her husband. And it's beautiful. You know, I don't have the strength to do that. I would be livid except Tyler Robinson had not been tried. Not any evidence has been presented to the public. The prosecution had not made its case. The defense had not even spoken. The jury had seen no single exhibit. No witness has been cross-examined. The investigation was not even a couple weeks old. and she forgave a man for something that had not been proven at all. Now, I know what some of you might think. She's a Christian, Danks. Christians forgive. That is literally the whole point of the faith. You don't wait for a jury verdict to practice what Christ taught. And you know what? You're right. You're right. Christianity teaches radical forgiveness. forgiveness before it is deserved. Really, forgiveness before it is earned. That is the core of the gospel. Uh, and if that is sincerely what was happening in that moment, if Erica Kirk was standing in that stadium genuinely channeling in the faith that she professes, then I have nothing but respect for her truly. But I need you to think about what forgiving someone actually means in this context. Because forgiveness requires belief and you cannot forgive someone for something that they did not do, at least they've not been proven of. Forgiveness presupposes guilt. I forgive him means he did it and I'm choosing to make sure that I know that he did it or to believe that he did it and I am going to choose to release him from the debt of that action on my burden from my burden. from his action. She chose to decide that that he was the guy that did it, Tyler Robinson, and she was going to forgive him. Open shut case. Just as open shut as the Fed narrative. She was not being just a good Christian. She was, whether she, this is the thing, it's at this point, whether she knew it or not, she rendered a verdict to millions of people in public. I [ __ ] if I was Tyler Robinson, I'd sue the hell out of her. I would sue the hell. If I had to spend the rest of my life in prison, I'd still sue the [ __ ] out of her because you are literally um putting somebody in a position to where you make everyone just like like if you go and like we're all in our little bubble here. There's a thousand people watching. We're all in our bubble. Okay. But if you go to work and you talk to people, you talk to your parents. I mean, depending on who you are, most people all they know is Charlie got killed. Tyler Robinson or some radical leftist furry guy did it and he's being held in court to go to court. That's all that people know. They don't know about everything that we've uncovered. They don't know about all the lies. They haven't been following the story. So, she literally rendered a verdict in public before any evidence has been tested. Before any defense had even begun to prepare their case, 11 days after her husband was killed, Erica Kirk stood in front of the world and closed this case. How do you forgive what has not been proven? How do you close a book that has been written that has not been written yet unless you already knew how the story is going to end? But here's the part that a lot of people miss is because Erica Kirk's relationship with forgiveness, it it really did not end at the memorial. It happened to change dramatically. Two months later, November 2025, um Erica actually sits down with Megan Kelly. Live event, soldout audience, the subject of Tyler Robinson comes up again. And this time she says something very different. Anything that I could ever wish upon him or the family would pale in comparison of the justice of God. The justice of God, that is not forgiveness. That is the opposite of what you said prior. That is fire and brimstone. That is a woman invoking divine wrath on the same man that she publicly forgave days earlier. That is not I release you from this debt. It's not. That is what I could do to you is nothing compared to what God would do. So which is it? Which is it Erica? Forgiveness at the memorial when the cameras are rolling when the entire nation is watching? When the moment demanded grace and the image required composure, grace, forgiveness, or is it the justice of God? Two months later, when the spotlight shifts, when the audience was smaller, maybe when you've been attacked a little bit, when the strategic value of forgiveness had been fully extracted, the articles called it a change in her tune. We all saw that. She left and came back because everyone was like, "What the hell is this? She's not upset. She's not sad. She's not angry now. She comes back with those ch uh with those eyes. We all know the memes. She says what the moment requires. Whatever lands best, whatever builds the image that she needs to build at that moment. Forgiveness is what forgiveness is for her when it stands in ovation at that very moment. And then the divine wrath is another time when she needs to get this message across because nobody was believing her at that before. So she moves to another to get that new applause. Remember that small lie I never dated. She said to Barry Weiss, is it Barry Weiss? Um I just want to look at something real quick. Need to know my timeline here on what time Uh, okay. So, I have like 20 minutes left. So, there's a lot of things in between this story. I'm not going to be able to get through everything that I have. So, what we're going to do is we're going to we're going to split this up into two shows and we're going to let because Candace goes live at two, which is in 25 minutes and this is much longer than I had anticipated. Um, but I'll keep going for a little bit and then what I would like you to do is come back tomorrow and I will I'm going to go live earlier tomorrow. Uh, probably an hour earlier. I have to do something uh at 2 tomorrow, 1:30. So, um, so yeah, we'll continue and then tomorrow I will pick up. But let's keep going for a few and continue talking about this story because I think I was going to maybe skip some things, but I think this whole story needs to be told in it in the way it deserves because this is a start to now scenario. And really the image is cracking layer by layer. I don't know which one it is. Is it forgiveness at the memorial or is it the wrath of God? that that small lie I never dated that she told CBS's audience that's what they needed to hear. And at the memorial she said that whatever the memorial audience needed to hear. And with Megan Kelly she said whatever the audience needed to hear. Her content changes. She's like a content creator on YouTube except we're I'm like we're more consistent. we are. You go to through my channel how much more consistent I've been on all the stuff I've been talking about. Again, the image is cracking layer by layer. Lie by lie, the cracks are spreading and what is underneath is becoming harder to ignore. I haven't checked yet if there are any supers or memberships. I'll announce them very shortly and then we'll finish off with a couple of questions if anybody wants to talk. Um, so if you want to get those in or if there are there, I will go through them very momentarily, probably in the next five minutes or so. But again, the image is cracking and I'll walk you through a few moments, all documented on camera, all in the public record, and I want you to watch what happens when we lay them side by side. She had a video circulating online and it appears to show Erica Kirk backstage at a TPSA event. Before she walks on stage, before the audience could see her, she appears to apply something to her eyes. Critics say it was tear solution. Eye drops designed to make her eyes glisten. Maybe it was just red be gone or whatever. Visine. It's been so long since I've used Visine. Uh but some people said it was something to make her look like she had been crying. Then she walks out emotional, eyes glistening, the grieving widow. Is it possible that those were real eye drops for dry eyes, for contacts, for allergies? Of course, anything is possible. And I'm not an opthalmologist, and I'm not going to pretend to know what someone is putting in their eyes. Could have been liquid acid for all I know. Who cares? But the thing is people do care because we have seen a lot of strange things from those eyes and most of them haven't been tears. But I need you to understand the context in which these things exist. This is a woman who told CBS that she never dated when her own social media shows otherwise. a woman who went from a story stay-at-home tradion dollar corporation in a few days after losing her husband. A woman who celebrated merch sales just like less than a week after her husband was murdered. And this is a woman who forgave an accused killer before a trial and then evoked divine wrath shortly after. In that con on that in that context, a backstage video of her apparently applying something to her eyes before walking out to cry in front of an audience does not land the same way for me as it would for anyone else. Is it dry eyes? For someone with this type of pattern, it is another data point in my analytical mind for this series that keeps getting harder and harder to explain away the coincidences. And if you think I'm being unfair, I want you to do a thought experiment. Imagine this video existed in isolation. Imagine there were no lies about dating. Imagine you didn't know who this person was. There's no 8day CEO transition, no leaked Zoom call, no forgiveness flip, just a woman that you have no idea who she is. She looks fine before going on stage. Puts drops in her eyes backstage. You see this happen, you would never give it a second thought and you would scroll past it. But that doesn't exist in isolation. Actually, that story doesn't exist here in this situation. Every piece connects. Every detail reinforces the other one. It's cascading progressive. The question I keep asking is, and what point is basically what point do these coincidences stop? And it might seem like I'm I'm picking at small things. There's a lot of things here. You've got the hug with JD Vance that was, you know, seven weeks, I think, after Charlie Kirk's assassination. The outfit, you know, she introduces JD Vance. Where is he now? It's almost like, oh, the pressure got too hot, babe. I got to like keep you on the down low. I mean, is that what we don't see JD Vance hear anything? He was like all up in the limelight hugging her gra like that was what a little too close you guys put flew a little too close to the sun. Is that what happened? They embraced her hand went to the back of his head. Remember that his hands went to her waist. I mean it's just all by all means it was inappropriate. I'm sorry man. People don't want to say it. I think it's inappropriate. I don't care if you hug people like that or not. It's inappropriate. It was extended as well. It was intimate. It was the kind of embrace that made millions of people watching at home in the audience stop what they were doing and ask the very same question all at the same time. What exactly is this relationship here? I'm not suggesting romantic relationships between Erica Kirk and JD Vance. I have zero evidence of that and I'm not going to speculate about it. But I am describing the visual. What the camera captured and what the camera captured was an embrace between a recently widowed woman and the vice president of the United States that's married that did not look like a professional greeting to a grieving widow. Whose side was worse? I don't know. I'm not a I'm not a body language expert. But it did not look like a consolation hug. It looked like something else and millions of people noticed. I mean, if it wasn't that, people wouldn't have said it. I'm telling you, we're not like out here trying to make a narrative. I'm not. I mean, a handshake would do or like an ass out hug, you know, like all women almost do basically when they don't like, you know, the ass out hug would have been fine. My love language is touch, she said to Megan Kelly. That was the official explanation actually from the woman who built a brand on modesty and traditional values and biblical submission. My love language is touch directed at you like a love language. So are you into like what is that Chinese astrology and all this stuff? Because that's what I I mean I don't know to me as a Christian do you have a love language? Is that a thing? I've never even heard of that until I started studying all this extra stuff around spirituality. So, love language of touch directed and married vice president of the United States 7 weeks after her husband was not buried. Um, and I'm not going to tell you what to think about that hug. I will tell you what the camera recorded like I have. And I'm telling you that the explanation that she gives does not match the image that she spent years building or weeks saying she built over years. Which at this point in the story should absolutely surprise nobody. Let me see. See if I can find something. wanted to pull up this picture. It's not showing up. I think I have one here. Let me see. Check this out. Let me see if I can find it. Um, can't find it. Yeah, interesting. Thought I had a picture, but I can't find it. But anyways, it's here. Yeah. Well, I don't have the one I wanted to show, but let's let's take a look at this right quick. This is here. What's the timeline on this? What's the timeline on this? I want to know. Do you know? So, this was um man, this is like a bot bot site. Does this have a date? Let's see. Either way, I know that this wasn't that. This is I mean, this is a relationship that appears like I mean, look at this, bro. Look at this. I mean, this is I I think I could even I mean, I don't know. Judge for yourself. Judge for yourself. Keith's giving five danks memberships. So, what we're going to do is tomorrow I'm like a third of the way through, maybe a little more. We're going to start I I'll do some searching on what I need for a couple of images that I didn't have that I'd like to show. Maybe I can show some pictures as I speak this time tomorrow. I'll try to do some side by sides. But yeah, uh I'll look out for any questions in the chat while I look through these. Thank you, Keats, for the memberships. Um, but yeah, man, this stuff. Say thanks to Keats if you got a membership. What I don't know is staggering. Oh, by the way, if you want to become a member, you can just for 99 cents. Uh, there's different tiers for different levels of support and different opportunities within those memberships. But on YouTube, you can join for 99 cents and Friday's membersonly live streams. And also we have um private members lives that I've archived that are more detailed in the financials and stuff that I've done a lot of research on. So feel free to become a member. Thank you for joining. And what I don't know is staggering 8561. Nice name. Keats looks like a member for a month or upgrade membership. Welcome back or welcome again. Anna Martina 33. Welcome to the welcome to becoming a gangster. Measured man. Hey, I sent you a DM on X, bro. I got to check and see if you responded. Gifted five memberships. Say thanks to measured man. Shannon says, "I believe you raise your kids with love and discipline." Uh, love discipline is part of love. The teaching of right and wrong, but you do all things in love. Randomly ran into this stream. Congratulations. You have more viewers than today's Charlie Kirk show. You're serious. You can't be serious. You can't be serious. They have like He has like two millions followers, doesn't they? Let me see. Live stream. Are they still live streaming on his show videos? Oh, five hours ago. Damn, you're right. No cap, huh? 5K views. This guy. 5,000 views. 5 million subs, bro. Five million subs. Look at this. 8,000 views. We have a thousand lives. That's crazy, bro. That's crazy. Well, thanks for letting me know. I guess we're on the track to making it big. 5 million subs on the way. Welcome to Girl Friday on a Tuesday. Um, let me see if there's anything else you can follow on Rumble. Oh, you can also support on Cash App, Venmo, Dangster Intel, and then if you want to become a Patreon supporter and become part of the intelligence apparatus, we do research and we communicate directly and do weekly, I mean daily, if I am available, we do daily uh debriefs as well at 9:00 a.m. Pacific time. We also are organizing something very important. So, if you want to become part of the Americans for Transparency organization, please join for $5 in the patreon.com/original dankster and you can do that and join as soon as you'd like and you'll become a part of the apparatus. Laura loves 1214 with a $10 coming through for your boy. I talk so much on the chat. I thought I better give you this heart. Keep up the great content. Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you very much. I appreciate the super chat. It means a lot. Keeps me going. This stuff takes a long time to put together and also like, you know, obviously I'm not a massive person on platforms quite yet, but I get a lot of views it seems like. And put your neck on the line. It It's nice to be shown some love. I appreciate that. Pam Bates, welcome. Oh, by the way, if you're wondering if you're trying to join as a member on your phone, the Apple Store charges 30% more on all apps. All apps, they charge 30% more of anything that you're purchasing. So, if I say it's a dollar, they're going to charge $1.50. Just use your browser. Maybe even on Safari browser. As long as you're on the browser itself, you'll be good to go. I appreciate that. Appreciate the super. Appreciate all the members. We have five minutes before I probably bounce in just a second here. I just want to mark my spots. Tomorrow I'm going to go live at I think they said I have to be somewhere at two. Let me double check so I can give you a decent time for now. It's at two. Yeah. Okay. So, we'll do uh tomorrow at like 10:30 or 11 Pacific Standard Time. That's the goal. If I can go at 10:00, I will. It depends if Coach Colin's going live. If not, we might start at 10:00. So, I'll I'll put up a thing about an hour or two before, so you'll be able to see it. Thanks for joining. I appreciate everyone for being here. Thank you. Thank you. And we'll see you tomorrow. And enjoy the stream. Let Candace know you came from the Dangster Intel show and we'll see you later. Is