Tracy Barton Debunks Candace Owens' Lies About Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Uncovers Phillip Goldsberry Jr. Miked Charlie Kirk With Rode Wireless Pro Inside Shirt

Candace Owens Uncovers Phillip Goldsberry Jr. Miked Charlie Kirk With Rode Wireless Pro Inside Shirt

1:00:52

Zach Costello Responds to Graham Allen's Attack on Candace Owens and the Erika Kirk Investigation

Zach Costello Responds to Graham Allen's Attack on Candace Owens and the Erika Kirk Investigation

49:01

Candace Owens Reveals FBI Pressure to Close Charlie Kirk Case as Lone Gunman Amid Growing Evidence

Candace Owens Reveals FBI Pressure to Close Charlie Kirk Case as Lone Gunman Amid Growing Evidence

47:35

Tracy Barton Debunks Candace Owens' Lies About Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Tracy Barton, a 15-year friend of Erika Kirk, sits down to systematically dismantle the conspiracy theories and falsehoods spread by Candace Owens regarding Charlie Kirk's assassination and his widow. Tracy reveals details from her recent phone conversation with Candace, exposes lies about Tracy's daughter working for Turning Point USA, confirms Erika's whereabouts on the day of the assassination, and addresses conspiracies ranging from Charlie's burial to the Romanian charity work. This firsthand testimony from someone with intimate knowledge of the Kirk family stands as a powerful counter-narrative to months of defamation and speculation.

February 21, 2026

Setting the Record Straight on Truth and Lies

Truth matters. Not feelings, not hearsay, not tips from anonymous sources, but actual, verifiable truth. Over the past six months, Candace Owens has built a substantial portion of her platform on spreading what amounts to lies and conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's assassination. The people bearing the brunt of this campaign have been Charlie's widow, Erika Kirk, and their children, along with those who dare to defend them.

Tracy Barton, a 15-year friend of Erika Kirk, has decided to come forward with the facts. This isn't about silencing anyone or covering anything up. This is about debunking lies with actual evidence from people who have lived experience with the Kirk family, not speculation from a podcaster with a tip line.

Why Tracy Barton Chose to Speak Out

Tracy Barton's decision to speak publicly came from a place of necessity and moral obligation. As she explains, this moment in time demands that people with truth speak out. Having known Erika for 15 years—a friendship that began through Charlie, as nearly all of Erika's friendships did—Tracy possesses intimate knowledge of Erika's character that spans more than a decade.

The breaking point came when Candace went after Tracy's family, specifically her daughter. As Tracy states clearly: "You don't get to have a platform and use it irresponsibly to destroy people. You don't see the damage that you're doing because you're sitting in your studio and you're not on the receiving end of DMs, horrific accusations, and she went after my child."

Tracy's motivation is straightforward: as a believer, she believes in protecting people who are being attacked. When you have truth and the voice to use it, with nothing to hide, it becomes a responsibility to speak up. Candace Owens may not care about real-life consequences, but Tracy does.

The Lie About Tracy's Daughter and Prior Knowledge

One of Candace Owens' most damaging conspiracy theories revolves around Tracy's daughter and an alleged phone conversation that Candace frames as evidence of prior knowledge of Charlie's assassination. The way Candace presents it, Tracy called her daughter the day before or very soon before Charlie was murdered, expressing concerns about her daughter traveling with Charlie and Erika to campus events, implying foreknowledge of danger.

The truth is considerably different. Tracy's daughter does not and has never worked for Turning Point USA. She works for Erika's personal brands: Proclaim Street (the clothing line) and Bible 365 Ministry. During the summer months before Charlie's assassination, there had been discussions about Tracy's daughter potentially taking on additional travel responsibilities with Charlie and Erika, who traveled as a family.

As any parent would, Tracy had conversations with her daughter about this potential new role—discussions about job satisfaction, value, and whether this was the right direction. These conversations happened months before the assassination, not days or hours before. Tracy's concerns were typical parental ones about a daughter's career path and the general volatile nature of the political climate, not specific foreknowledge of an imminent threat.

On the day of Charlie's assassination, Tracy was in her coaching studio with back-to-back clients in Missouri. When the news broke, her phone exploded with messages. Some clients knew Charlie, many were distraught. In the emotional chaos of that day, Tracy had a conversation with a friend where she expressed the natural maternal response: "What if my daughter had been there? What would that have done to her to witness that?"

This normal expression of parental relief and hypothetical fear was taken out of context, plugged into Candace's narrative, and presented as evidence of conspiracy. As Tracy explains, "When something is taken out of context, plugged into a narrative, and then ran out, I can see where people get twisted on this. And it's very manipulative, but there's no context."

Tracy's Phone Conversation With Candace Owens

In a surprising revelation, Tracy discloses that she had an hour-long phone conversation with Candace Owens. After Candace publicly defamed Tracy and her family, Tracy posted a video essentially saying, "Here I am. If you have these questions and you want to know what's going on and you really want the truth by someone who actually has the truth, I'm right here. I have nothing to hide."

Candace did send a direct message, and they spoke last Sunday for an hour. Tracy's intention was simple: to set the record straight about the lies and defamation regarding her family, especially her daughter, because Candace had put people in harm's way with no regard for consequences.

During the conversation, Tracy realized it wasn't really about finding truth. As the call progressed, Candace kept telling Tracy that she didn't know Erika, that Erika was lying at every point, and that Erika never loved Charlie. When Tracy pointed out that she had 15 years of lived experience versus Candace's "perceived information and created content," Candace said, "We are at an impasse."

Tracy believes the call was actually an attempt to come between her and Erika, to drive a wedge in their friendship. At the time of the call, Tracy had no idea that Candace was preparing an exposé documentary targeting Erika.

Perhaps most damning: during the call, Tracy asked Candace directly how she planned to correct the wrongs against Tracy's family. Candace promised she would "instantaneously" put a message out to correct the record. As of the filming of this interview, more than a week later, Candace has done no such thing. She has not kept her word.

Erika's Alibi: She Was With Her Mother

Candace Owens has repeatedly claimed that Erika's "alibi is falling apart," suggesting Erika was not with her mother on the day of Charlie's assassination. This framing itself is problematic—Erika Kirk is not a suspect and doesn't need an alibi. This is about what actually happened versus what didn't happen.

Tracy sets the record completely straight: it is a complete lie that Erika was not with her mother. There is verifiable information that Erika was with her mother at treatment. This includes confirmation from the clinic itself, photos, timestamps, and text messages. It is undeniable.

Tracy emphasizes that people don't realize the depth of Lori's illness (Erika's mother). During Tracy's phone conversation with Candace, Candace tried to push back on this, claiming she knew about the diagnosis and treatment. But Candace even got the location of where Lori had treatment incorrect.

The conversation between Charlie and Erika that morning was about home needing her, her mom needing her, and Erika needing to take care of her mother. That's exactly what Erika did. The clinic can verify it. Text messages back it up. Other people confirm it. This is not speculation—this is documented fact.

The Family Question: Why Didn't Erika's Family Travel With Her?

Another of Candace's conspiracy angles involves questioning why Erika's family didn't accompany her to Utah after Charlie was shot, and why she allegedly "waited over an hour" for Andrew Kolvet on the tarmac before going to the hospital (which didn't happen—Andrew met her at the hospital).

Tracy provides context that Candace conveniently ignores: Erika's mother was extremely ill in Arizona and obviously couldn't travel. Erika's sister lives in Ohio. Her father and his wife are on the west side of Phoenix and are not in the best physical condition to travel on short notice. Erika's cousin, with whom she's close, was not in the immediate vicinity.

When Candace brought this up on their phone call, Tracy's response was logical: Charlie was the one who was assassinated. The Turning Point people say themselves they're like a family. Of course they wanted to go. They were right there and available immediately.

Erika literally stepped out of the clinic, dropped to her knees when she got the news, and went straight to the airport. Father Klein, a dear friend of the family, met her there just to pray for her. God blessed this man—he got on the plane with her without questions. There was a need, there was a crisis, and he responded.

In a crisis, you go with whoever is there. You don't have time to coordinate family members flying in from across the country. The priority was getting to Charlie as quickly as possible while he might still be alive. As Tracy points out, the contradiction in Candace's position is staggering—she finds it suspicious both that Erika allegedly waited (which she didn't) and that family members from across the country weren't on the plane with her.

The Burial Conspiracy

Among the more ghoulish conspiracy theories circulated by Candace and others is the question: Was Charlie even buried? Where is he buried? Why is there no proof?

Tracy confirms unequivocally: Yes, Charlie Kirk was buried. She was there. She witnessed it.

Her response to the conspiracy theorists demanding proof is pointed: "Your entitlement is deafening." Tracy wasn't even invited to the private service initially—she doesn't complain about it. She wishes she hadn't had to be there at all to witness such tragedy.

Erika did everything necessary to protect that burial and the location for her children. Given the climate of the world and the threats the family had faced, this was not just reasonable but necessary. There is a memorial at Turning Point USA headquarters for anyone who wants to pay their respects, but no one is entitled to know where Charlie is buried.

This is a real family with real lives. They deserve the privacy to visit the grave of their husband and father without fear of desecration or harassment. The children especially need to be able to visit their daddy in private. Taking that away from them would be unconscionable.

The Romanian Charity Conspiracy

In one of her more outlandish theories, Candace has suggested that Erika was involved in some kind of child sex trafficking operation through a Romanian charity organization. This lie is particularly vicious because it attacks charitable work designed to help orphans.

Tracy was directly involved in the Romanian Angel Project and can explain exactly what it was: essentially a Toys for Tots type program for orphans in Romania. It was one of several projects under Erika's nonprofit LLC designed to help vulnerable populations.

Erika came to Tracy saying she wanted to help an orphanage and wanted to find out what their actual needs were—not assumptions, but their real needs. They received a list: toothbrushes, games, books, MP3 players, coloring supplies. Simple things.

Multiple families would donate or participate. Tracy and her daughters would go shopping together. Tracy specifically wanted her daughters involved in the experience of helping others, and she trusted Erika's judgment about what causes to support. They would pick items for specific children (boy or girl), and Tracy's daughters would wrap them in specific Christmas wrapping paper.

They would gather at Erika's house where Lori lived, have a wrapping day with everyone present, and pray over the gifts. The packages were then sent with help from the Marines, who facilitated delivery since direct shipping wasn't possible. When the gifts were delivered in Romania, Erika would send back videos so the participating families—and especially the children who had wrapped the gifts—could see the impact of their work. Tracy's kids would see their specific wrapping paper and realize "we did that all the way around the world."

The entire 501(c)(3) was started in memory of one of Erika's friends who died as a teenager. This was always about Erika's heart for helping others.

Tracy's response to the trafficking conspiracy is direct: "Does child trafficking happen? Yes, it happens around the world. It happens here in Phoenix. So if somebody's worried about that, get involved locally." The logic that proximity to Romania or involvement in a charity there somehow implicates someone in trafficking would mean everyone in Atlanta—one of America's biggest trafficking hubs—is a sex trafficker.

Sometimes things aren't that deep. This was a simple Christmas angel program to give back to orphans. No money was exchanged beyond purchasing gifts. It was exactly what it appeared to be.

The Catholic Conspiracy

Candace Owens has become fixated on claiming that Charlie was Catholic or was in the process of converting to Catholicism, taking OCIA (Order of Christian Initiation of Adults) classes. Tracy firmly debunks this.

Charlie was not Catholic. He was not taking classes. He was not enrolled in OCIA. What he did appreciate was the architecture and reverence of Catholic churches. Tracy relates to this personally—her husband is Catholic, her older daughter is Eastern Orthodox Catholic, and Tracy herself loves going to Catholic churches to sit in reverence and tradition. That's literally what it was for Charlie. It's not that deep.

Charlie was crystal clear about his faith foundation. Trying to poke holes in this or claim him for Catholicism is another example of hijacking Charlie's actual message and faith. As Tracy notes, even Charlie's appreciation for certain aspects of Catholic tradition and his agreement that Protestants might have overcorrected regarding Mary doesn't make him Catholic.

The Pattern of Lies and Manipulation

Throughout the conversation, Tracy identifies consistent patterns in how Candace operates. She takes pieces of information out of context, adds implication rather than asking neutral questions, and allows her audience to fill in blanks through "conspiratorial psychosis." She uses phrases like "it's interesting" or "that's weird" to seed doubt without making direct accusations.

When challenged with facts, Candace's response is to claim her sources have told her differently or to dismiss the lived experience of people who actually know Erika. During their phone call, even when Tracy corrected obvious falsehoods—like the claim that Charlie and Erika had an argument the night before his death because they woke their daughter—Candace refused to accept the correction.

The truth about that night: their daughter came into their bedroom (as toddlers do), and because Charlie had an early flight and needed sleep, Erika suggested he go sleep in their daughter's room. Anyone with children knows this is completely normal. But Candace, who apparently has a night nanny, claimed that a toddler shouldn't wake up and therefore the situation proved there was an argument.

Tracy's response to this reveals everything: "Rich elitist night nanny mindset." If Candace can conclude from a child waking up that there was a fight, then Tracy can conclude that if Candace doesn't know three-year-olds wake up at 2:30 in the morning, she obviously isn't getting up with her children.

The Real Damage to Real People

Tracy emphasizes repeatedly that these are real people with real lives facing real consequences. The DMs, the accusations, the attacks—Candace doesn't see or experience any of this from her studio. She creates content that destroys lives and reputations without regard for the collateral damage.

The Kirk children will grow up and ask where their daddy's friends were. They'll ask why people didn't defend their mother. They'll want to know why no one did anything while their family was being attacked. Tracy's message is clear: she won't be someone who stood by and did nothing.

From a biblical perspective, Tracy talks about the reprobate mind, the depraved mind that God gives people over to until it's time to not do that anymore. She believes this is why more people are becoming outspoken—there's a tipping point where people realize the conspiracy has gone too far, that dots are being connected that go nowhere, and that the damage is too extensive to ignore.

What This Revival Was Hijacked From

Tracy makes a powerful point about what was lost in all of this. When Charlie was assassinated, the world experienced a revival. Tracy had clients, young clients, asking her for Bibles, asking her to teach them scripture. She may not be a theologian, but she's on fire for Christ because she knows the world needs him.

That revival was hijacked. Instead of the message of faith and the impact of Charlie's life continuing, the narrative became about conspiracy theories, accusations against his widow, and destruction of everyone associated with the family. The collateral damage includes Erika and everyone who cares about her.

Tracy stepped out to defend Erika's character, and in doing so, inserted herself into this situation. But she has no regrets because as Christians, we are specifically called to care for widows and orphans. The Bible is very clear on this. Standing up for Erika isn't optional for someone who knows the truth—it's a biblical mandate.

Why Is Candace Doing This?

When asked for her assessment of Candace's motivations, Tracy is direct: "I just think she wants to destroy Erika and I think she wants to destroy Turning Point." It may not be more complicated than that. There's also money involved—Candace is making substantial money off these conspiracy podcasts.

When Candace brought up that Turning Point is making money, Tracy's response was perfect: "They should. Charlie paid with his life."

Tracy asked Candace directly during their phone call what her endgame was. Candace claimed it was to find truth. Tracy then asked if Candace possessed the humility to pivot and right the wrong when presented with actual truth and facts. The answer, based on Candace's subsequent actions (or lack thereof), appears to be no.

If someone truly wants truth, they have a responsibility when presented with factual information to correct the record. Candace promised to "instantaneously" put out a message correcting her false statements about Tracy's family. She has not done so. If Candace can't keep her word about something as simple as a corrective post, how can anyone trust her to do anything else?

The Responsibility to Speak Truth

Tracy's message to viewers is about courage. When you know something that is true and factual, you need to logically address it. Don't get sucked into the chaos or the machine, because you will eventually become the machine yourself.

Speaking truth is actually easy because truth stands on its own. There's nothing to hide when you're standing on truth. Tracy is happy to have confrontational conversations with anyone because she stands on that truth and knows that God is all over this conversation.

Most importantly, God knows Erika's heart, and that's really all that matters. It's no one else's job to judge another. If you are a Christian and a believer questioning any of this, Tracy's advice is simple: get back in the word.

A Message About Pattern Recognition

Tracy's professional background gives her particular insight into patterns of behavior. She works with individuals and families and recognizes behavioral patterns quickly. She saw what was happening with Candace Owens and recognized the pattern.

She compares it to the COVID situation, where those who spoke out from day one were called crazy, told they didn't know anything, attacked—until more people started recognizing the pattern and building a counter-narrative. There comes a tipping point where people realize something has gone too far.

The same pattern is emerging here. People are becoming mentally and emotionally exhausted by the conspiracy theories. The dots don't connect. The damage to real people is becoming undeniable. More people like Tracy are speaking up because enough is enough.

Standing on Lived Experience vs. Perceived Authority

One of Tracy's most powerful points is the distinction between Candace's "perceived place of authority on a platform" and Tracy's 15 years of lived experience with Erika Kirk. Candace is a podcaster with a tip line at the end of the day. Tracy is someone who was at Erika and Charlie's wedding, who has been in their home multiple times, who knows their children, who helped Erika create Proclaim Street clothing line, who styled many of the photos that are now being used against Erika as "evidence" she's a gold digger.

Tracy met Charlie the first day Erika met him. She's been there for the entire relationship, marriage, birth of children, and the tragedy of Charlie's death. She was at the private funeral. This isn't speculation or tips from anonymous sources—this is direct, personal knowledge accumulated over a decade and a half.

When someone with that level of knowledge speaks, it carries weight that no amount of conspiracy theorizing can match. Truth backed by lived experience will always triumph over lies backed by nothing but implication and innuendo.

The Children's Future

Both Tracy and the interviewer emphasize a crucial point: the Kirk children will grow up. They will become adults. They will look back and ask where their father's friends were and why they didn't protect their mother. They will ask why people stood by and said nothing while their family was destroyed.

For Tracy, this is partly about her love for Charlie and her friendship with Erika, but it's also about those children. They deserve to grow up knowing that people stood up for their family. They deserve to know that their mother's character was defended by those who actually knew her.

The day will come when those children are old enough to understand what happened. When that day comes, Tracy wants to be able to look them in the eye and say she did something. She won't get to heaven and have the Lord ask her why she did nothing.

A Call for Others to Speak Up

Tracy's bravery in coming forward is significant because fear has kept many people silent. They're afraid of Candace's vindictiveness, afraid of how low she'll go, afraid of her platform and audience. But as Tracy points out, it's a perceived influence and a perceived place of authority. At the end of the day, Candace Owens is a podcaster.

The message is clear: if you have truth, if you have facts, if you have lived experience that counters the lies being spread, you have a responsibility to speak up. Don't let fear of mob mentality or conspiracy theorists keep you silent when you know the truth.

Silence can be interpreted as compliance. But speaking out means you'll be accused of having something to hide. You can't win by those rules, so do what's right anyway. Stand on truth regardless of the consequences.

The Bigger Picture

Tracy emphasizes that while this is about Erika and Charlie today, the implications are much broader. It was about other people before, it'll be about someone else tomorrow. The tactics being used here—psychological warfare, taking things out of context, seeding doubt through implication, building conspiracy narratives, destroying people's reputations and lives without regard for real-world consequences—these tactics affect everyone.

This is about more than one family. It's about a pattern of behavior that needs to be called out and stopped. It's about holding people accountable for the damage they do with their platforms. It's about protecting the truth in a world where lies travel faster and farther than facts.

As Tracy says, the moral inversion in our culture is rampant. What's happening to Erika Kirk is a symptom of a larger sickness in how we consume information and how we treat people who can't defend themselves against those with large platforms.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!