Defending Charlie Kirk Against Lies and Misrepresentations Spread After His Passing

[00:00] As I said earlier, there are a lot of

[00:01] people lying about the things that

[00:03] Charlie Kirk said and stood for and

[00:07] represented. And I showed you earlier

[00:09] how, you know, you've got AOC, you've

[00:11] got Ilan Omar, you've got the the squad

[00:14] trying to twist his words to their own

[00:16] sick narratives. And I see it a lot of

[00:17] memes floating around, too. But here's

[00:19] the thing. We have the receipts and we

[00:22] have what's called context.

[00:25] Cuz to make Charlie sound like a hateful

[00:27] person, you'd have to take him out of

[00:29] context. But we have the context. So

[00:31] please share this with any of your

[00:33] friends or any trolls on the

[00:36] internet who want to misrepresent what

[00:38] Charlie said now that he is not alive to

[00:41] defend himself. Let's start with Stephen

[00:43] King. This one's been going around a

[00:45] lot. He advocated stoning gays to death.

[00:48] Just saying. He was uh you know, Charlie

[00:51] was actually criticized uh he he

[00:54] criticized people for cherrypicking

[00:56] Bible verses. He criticized the uh

[00:59] YouTube star Miss Rachel for citing

[01:01] God's wish for Christians to quote love

[01:03] thy neighbor in Leviticus, saying that

[01:06] that should include gay people. That's

[01:07] what we hear all the time is just, well,

[01:09] love thy neighbor, therefore,

[01:12] therefore you should accept all of these

[01:14] things. Therefore, you should allow

[01:16] children to mutilate their body parts

[01:18] because remember God calls Christians to

[01:22] love thy neighbor. So Charlie was

[01:25] responding to Miss Rachel said, "By the

[01:28] way, Miss Rachel, you might want to

[01:29] crack open that Bible of yours." In a

[01:32] lesser reference, part of the same part

[01:33] of scripture in Leviticus 18 is that

[01:36] thou shalt not thou shalt lay with

[01:38] another man shall be stoned to death.

[01:42] Here's what Charlie actually said about

[01:44] the gay community. I believe marriage is

[01:46] one man, one woman. Also, gay people

[01:49] should be welcome in the conservative

[01:50] movement. As Christians, we are called

[01:52] to love everyone. I will always stand

[01:54] against people who wish to establish

[01:56] their own personal views as a reason to

[01:58] kick others out of our movement. And he

[02:01] had a long history of of engaging in a

[02:04] very kind debate or kind conversation

[02:09] with gay people when there's I mean, let

[02:12] let me just I'm going to play you a

[02:14] video of Charlie having a back and forth

[02:18] with a gay conservative. a gay

[02:21] conservative and I just want to kind of

[02:24] ask you like what do you have to say for

[02:25] people like me who kind of feel like I

[02:28] guess it's kind of hard for gay

[02:30] conservatives cuz there's not a lot of

[02:31] us. So like what do you have to say to

[02:33] other gay people who who need to realize

[02:35] like they do have a choice.

[02:36] >> Yeah. First of all, welcome to the

[02:37] conservative movement. I don't think you

[02:38] should introduce yourself just based on

[02:40] your your sexual attraction.

[02:41] >> I agree. I like that's not who you are.

[02:43] >> I like to be thought of as a person and

[02:44] >> for sure you are a complete human being

[02:46] and I'm sure you treat people well and

[02:48] you're studying something. So, I want to

[02:50] get away with this idea that you're gay

[02:52] anything. I just think that we have gone

[02:54] a long way in the negative direction in

[02:56] this country where we act as if the most

[02:58] important part of your identity is what

[03:01] you do in the bedroom. It doesn't mean

[03:02] that much to me. But if you ask from a

[03:04] perspective as a Christian, I I I don't

[03:06] agree at that lifestyle. But politics is

[03:08] about addition and multiplication. I

[03:10] imagine you agree with a lot of what we

[03:11] talk about, right? Strong borders,

[03:13] strong country. And for that, you know,

[03:15] we we welcome you into the conservative

[03:16] movement.

[03:18] Where's the hate that I was promised?

[03:21] Where's the hateful rhetoric? Where's

[03:23] the judging gay people? Where's the, oh,

[03:25] Charlie said gay people should be stoned

[03:26] to death. He just literally welcomed him

[03:28] into his movement.

[03:30] So, it's just not true. There was also

[03:33] one going around, you know, uh, Charlie

[03:35] was a fan of the Second Amendment.

[03:37] Uh-oh. That, well, he got shot to death.

[03:40] Here's what a Syracuse University

[03:42] professor had to say about that. Charlie

[03:44] Kirk said it was worth it to have quote

[03:47] a few gun deaths each year so that we

[03:49] can have the second amendment. He called

[03:51] those deaths prudent and a rational

[03:53] deal. Him dying this way seems both

[03:55] ironic and in line with his own

[03:57] politics. Now I want to play for you the

[04:00] real quote from Charlie which as you can

[04:03] guess was of course taken out of

[04:05] context.

[04:06] >> We need to be very clear that you're not

[04:08] going to get gun deaths to zero. It will

[04:12] not happen. Right.

[04:13] >> You can significantly reduce them

[04:15] through having more fathers in the home.

[04:17] >> Yes.

[04:17] >> By having more armed guards in front of

[04:19] schools.

[04:20] >> Yes.

[04:24] >> We we we should have a honest and clear

[04:27] reductionist view of gun violence, but

[04:30] we should not have a utopian one. You

[04:32] will never live in a society when you

[04:34] have an armed citizenry and you won't

[04:35] have a single gun death. That is

[04:37] nonsense. It's dril.

[04:39] >> But I am I I think it's I think it's

[04:41] worth it. I think it's worth to have a

[04:44] cost of unfortunately some gun deaths

[04:46] every single year so that we can have

[04:49] the second amendment to protect our

[04:50] other god-given rights. That is a

[04:53] prudent deal. It is rational.

[04:56] >> I promise you. I promise you that

[04:59] Charlie

[05:01] still believes that right now. I promise

[05:04] you because he understands the

[05:05] repercussion of not having an armed

[05:07] society. And he understands that just

[05:09] like with drugs and any other contraband

[05:11] that is sold on the black market these

[05:13] days because it's not illegal. You can't

[05:15] like just make guns illegal. Make we're

[05:18] going to make murder more illegal. I

[05:21] realize that's not a word. That's the

[05:22] point. We're going to make murder

[05:23] illegal and then people will stop doing

[05:25] it. Of course, he understands that and

[05:26] he there therefore he understands the

[05:28] importance of someone having the ability

[05:30] to protect themselves from the bad guy

[05:32] with the gun.

[05:33] Now, let's get to the racist claims. Oh,

[05:36] Charlie Kirk was a racist. Charlie Kirk

[05:38] was a racist. He was against

[05:40] desegregation in the 1964 Civil Rights

[05:42] Act. Okay, let's listen to uh to to

[05:44] Charlie on that. The

[05:45] >> Civil Rights Act was a mistake. What did

[05:47] you mean by that?

[05:48] >> Yeah. So, the parts of the Civil Rights

[05:49] Act were great, but the way it's now

[05:51] being implemented to force men and

[05:53] female bathrooms to push forward of the

[05:55] trans agenda, the intent of the Civil

[05:57] Rights Act is way beyond what it was

[05:58] originally authored for. But the intent

[06:00] specifically originally was to

[06:02] >> Well, that's So the intent and the law

[06:04] are two different things. So the intent

[06:06] was noble, which was to say that no

[06:08] American can be not allowed into a place

[06:10] of business based on the color of their

[06:11] skin or their ethnic heritage. Totally

[06:13] agreement with that. That's not what the

[06:14] law only did. It created a massive

[06:16] anti-racist DEI army that then gave us

[06:18] affirmative action. For example,

[06:20] recently Merrick Garland sued using the

[06:22] Civil Rights Act saying that we cannot

[06:24] have voter ID in certain states because

[06:25] it's a violation of the Civil Rights

[06:27] Act. So basically what the civil rights

[06:28] act did is that it went beyond disperate

[06:31] impact and then went to disperate effect

[06:33] in the sense where if black Americans

[06:35] are not doing as well as white Americans

[06:36] in a certain category, you can now use

[06:38] the Civil Rights Act and say that's a

[06:40] violation of the Civil Rights Act even

[06:41] though there might be other contributing

[06:43] factors. Does that make sense?

[06:44] >> Yeah.

[06:44] >> So it's too broad, too wide, and it's

[06:46] now doing a lot of damage to the

[06:47] country. It's being used well beyond its

[06:49] original intent.

[06:52] >> Pretty straightforward to me. Doesn't

[06:54] sound like a blatant racist. really

[06:57] doesn't. Let's uh let's listen to more

[07:00] uh from this very racist Charlie Kirk.

[07:04] >> Unfortunately, in the black community,

[07:06] dads are the most absent of any

[07:08] community. About 2/3 of all black youth

[07:10] will be raised without a stable father

[07:12] around. And I know it's crazy, right? Um

[07:16] and that that little precious angel of

[07:18] yours deserves to have a father around.

[07:23] >> Oh, no. He called this very cute little

[07:26] uh black baby a precious angel. Sounds

[07:29] like a terrible racist. Right

[07:33] now, let's get to the mainstream media.

[07:35] The New York Times told millions of

[07:38] their Well, I don't know if they have

[07:40] millions of readers anymore. Actually,

[07:43] I'm I'm They may not have millions of

[07:46] readers, but whoever the hell is still

[07:47] reading that crappy rag told all their

[07:50] readers that Charlie Kirk was

[07:52] anti-Semitic. They claimed that Charlie

[07:55] said this, "Jewish communities have been

[07:57] pushing the exact kind of hatred against

[07:59] whites that they claim to want people to

[08:01] stop using against them." They said

[08:04] Charlie Kirk, he said it on his podcast,

[08:07] The Charlie Kirk Show in 2023.

[08:11] Except, uhoh, he was actually critiquing

[08:14] that quote. Someone else said, "What

[08:17] Charlie actually said before reading it,

[08:20] half of this tweet is true, half of it I

[08:22] don't like."

[08:24] And then the New York Times was uh he

[08:28] they had to issue an apology. They had

[08:30] to issue an apology. A correction was

[08:32] made on September 11th, 2025. An earlier

[08:34] version of this article described

[08:36] incorrectly an anti-semitic statement

[08:37] that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode

[08:39] of his podcast. He was quoting a

[08:42] statement from a post on social media

[08:44] and went on to critique it. It was not

[08:46] his own statement.

[08:48] I don't think they care because the

[08:51] damage was already done and you cannot

[08:53] convince me that that was not

[08:55] intentional.

[08:56] New York Times. Okay. So, please share

[09:00] this with a friend.

[09:02] Share this with a friend

[09:05] who is spewing incorrect rhetoric about

[09:09] Charlie Kirk knowing that he is not here

[09:12] to defend himself

[09:14] and make sure they know that all of

[09:17] these are wrong and taken out of context

[09:19] so that they can fuel their hateful

[09:22] agenda. I hope I hope that this helps.