Up Next
Charlie Kirk on How Elon Musk Saved the Republic by Purchasing Twitter in Spring 2022
15:09
Charlie Kirk Breaks Down Kamala Harris DNC Speech: Neocon Rhetoric and Empty Promises
16:15
Charlie Kirk on Stephen Bannon Heading to Federal Prison for a Misdemeanor Conviction
52:00
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Subscribe on YouTubeGlenn Greenwald Exposes How Mike Johnson Betrayed Free Speech and Constitutional Principles for Power
Glenn Greenwald joins Charlie Kirk to dissect the dangerous expansion of anti-discrimination law through the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, which criminalizes criticism of Israel while protecting no other nation. Greenwald reveals how Speaker Mike Johnson abandoned his constitutional principles on FISA, warrantless spying, and FBI accountability within months of gaining power. The conversation explores how intelligence agencies manipulate newly elected officials through classified briefings in secure facilities, creating a pattern of capitulation that extends from Obama's broken promises to close Guantanamo to Johnson's reversal on Fourth Amendment protections.
The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act: A Direct Assault on Free Speech
Glenn Greenwald, independent journalist and host of System Update on Rumble, explains the fundamental problems with the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act that recently passed the House of Representatives. While no one disputes that anti-Semitism is reprehensible, Greenwald argues that defending free speech necessarily means protecting even repellent views from government censorship.
The legislation takes existing federal anti-discrimination law and incorporates a massively expansive definition of anti-Semitism previously advocated by Israel and adopted in some European countries. The House didn't just adopt the definition, but explicitly incorporated the examples themselves into federal law.
According to Greenwald, these examples now prohibit Americans from:
- Suggesting that a particular Jewish individual has more loyalty to Israel than the United States
- Criticizing Israel in ways that impose double standards compared to other democratic states
- Saying that Jewish people are responsible for the death of Jesus
- Comparing the behavior of the Israeli state to war crimes or crimes against humanity committed by Nazis
Greenwald emphasizes that while many of these views might be repellent, they are absolutely within the realm of protected free speech. The most disturbing aspect is the selective nature of these restrictions. Americans can express similar opinions about any other group—suggesting evangelicals prioritize Israeli interests over American interests is perfectly fine, and citizens can criticize other countries in any way they want, including with double standards. The one thing now prohibited is expressing these opinions about Jewish individuals or the state of Israel specifically.
Speaker Johnson Bypasses Committee Process During Campus Protests
Charlie Kirk highlights that Speaker Mike Johnson bypassed the standard committee process to rush this legislation to the floor, violating his promise that members would have 72 hours to read bills before voting. This maneuver occurred amid campus protests, the vast majority of which constitute constitutionally protected speech.
Greenwald traces this pattern back to the concessions Kevin McCarthy was forced to make before becoming Speaker. Members who successfully removed McCarthy had demanded necessary reforms because House leadership had consolidated so much power that the rest of Congress had become merely decorative. These reforms were designed to ensure the Speaker couldn't unilaterally control everything—members needed the right to read legislation, pass things through committee, and control what reaches the House floor.
Despite watching McCarthy get deposed for violating these promises, Mike Johnson made the same commitments and is now systematically violating almost every one. Greenwald explains that Johnson can operate with impunity because Republicans cannot remove him—Democrats have promised protection as long as he serves their agenda, which he has done faithfully.
Mike Johnson's Complete Reversal on Constitutional Principles
Greenwald reveals a stunning fact: Mike Johnson appeared on System Update just three months before becoming Speaker, where he passionately defended constitutional principles as a self-described constitutional law professor. These weren't throwaway talking points but elaborated convictions about:
- Opposition to funding for the war in Ukraine
- The evils of warrantless eavesdropping and a promise never to renew FISA without reforms
- Strong criticism of the FBI and opposition to spending $9 billion on a new FBI headquarters
After becoming Speaker, Johnson reversed every single position. He led the way to continue funding the war in Ukraine, renewed FISA without reforms at the behest of the CIA and Biden White House, and oversaw the appropriation of funds for the FBI headquarters he had previously condemned.
The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act passed with overwhelming bipartisan support—only 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats voted against it. Both parties saw a political opportunity to claim rampant anti-Semitism endangers Jewish students, creating a moral panic similar to previous campaigns around racial minorities or transgender individuals that justified controlling speech to prevent violence or genocide.
What Happens Inside the SCIF: The Intelligence Community's Manipulation Tactics
When asked what motivates such dramatic reversals, Greenwald addresses the popular theory that officials are blackmailed. While acknowledging that political blackmail has been used by U.S. Security State agencies historically—J. Edgar Hoover maintained dossiers on political officials for six decades, which allowed him to run the FBI through fear—Greenwald resists making blackmail accusations without evidence.
Instead, he points to Johnson's own explanation. When asked why he changed his mind, Johnson said he went to briefings. Intelligence agencies bring newly powerful officials into the bowels of American power—the Situation Room, secure NSA facilities—where people with medals on their chests and tremendous authority treat them like dignitaries, explaining the supposed necessity of spying on Americans without warrants.
Greenwald explains that officials quickly learn their newfound power, prestige, and access to the inner circle depends upon serving an agenda they previously opposed. Human nature craves power, and people are willing to make compromises to maintain it.
The Theater of Classified Briefings
Greenwald provides insight from his Snowden reporting, which spanned two and a half years and revealed that the NSA had secretly converted the internet into a system of mass domestic warrantless surveillance directed not just at foreign populations but at Americans themselves. This occurred unbeknownst to most members of Congress.
A few months after these revelations began, the NSA invited 60 Minutes into secret parts of the facility. The broadcast crew was visibly excited, showing cameras capturing codes being entered on doors, enamored with the toys and futuristic atmosphere. Yet as Greenwald notes with amusement, these were just conference rooms with nothing particularly special in them. But because they were presented as secret spaces where super-important activities occur—similar to how the Situation Room is portrayed—people feel important and grateful to be granted access.
Speaker Mike Johnson now sits third in line to the presidency. The question becomes: does he want to return to the back benches of Congress? The answer is obviously no, and he's willing to do anything to maintain his position.
Greenwald acknowledges that even critics of Security State agencies have been conditioned to believe that what happens in the CIA, NSA, and FBI is super sophisticated, highly secretive, and genuinely important—sometimes actually catching criminals or terrorists or protecting the country. Even people critical of these agencies can become hypnotized once they're embraced, welcomed in, and presented with top-secret documents.
The Obama Precedent: Constitutional Scholar Turned Drone Enthusiast
Greenwald draws a parallel to Barack Obama's transformation. Obama ran for president in 2008 presenting himself as a constitutional lawyer. Americans had turned against the excesses of the War on Terror, and Obama promised to uproot all the neoconservative and Bush-Cheney domestic abridgments of civil liberties undertaken in the name of fighting terrorism.
Within two months of taking office, Obama fell in love with David Petraeus and his Harvard and Princeton-educated generals. He became enamored with Special Forces and drones. Not only did he fail to uproot any of the programs he campaigned against, but he continued and in many ways expanded them—the very programs he swore repeatedly to eliminate, including closing Guantanamo, ending interrogation programs, and reforming surveillance.
Greenwald attributes this to Obama being enamored with the secret briefings and access. The intelligence officials who conduct these briefings have been around for decades and know exactly how to manipulate newly elected presidents or newly elected House speakers.
The 2008 Obama Wave and Broken Promises
Charlie Kirk reflects that Obama's support in 2007-2008 came significantly from promises to close Guantanamo and give people time to read bills, positioning himself against Bush-Cheney excesses. While John McCain would likely have lost regardless—it was an Obama wave year—the margins of power came partly from cultural libertarians, privacy-focused voters, and people concerned about civil liberties who believed Obama's rhetoric.
Obama not only failed to deliver on any of these promises but became worse in some ways for domestic spying and civil rights abuses than anything seen in recent memory. Kirk credits Greenwald's reporting, particularly around the Snowden revelations, with fundamentally shaping his own views on domestic spying, while lamenting the lack of legislative reform despite these revelations.
The Lobby Complex in Washington
Greenwald notes it's not controversial to say Washington runs on well-organized, well-financed lobbies—Planned Parenthood, the NRA, Big Tech, Wall Street, pharmaceutical companies. The pro-Israel lobby is a major force in this landscape. Additionally, members of Congress have various motivations for supporting Israel: some have religious or cultural reasons to love the state of Israel, others believe it's an important component of national security.
All these positions are legitimate to hold, but they don't justify assaults on the free speech rights of Americans to protect a foreign country. They certainly don't support attempting to characterize criticism of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act as being in favor of anti-Semitism—a rhetorical tactic designed to silence dissent.
Kirk observes that Washington seems capable of agreeing on only a few things: spying on Americans, borrowing money the country doesn't have, restricting speech, and financing wars that don't serve American interests. The rapid, bipartisan passage of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act during campus protests exemplifies all these tendencies converging at once.
Video Transcript
someone who I wanted to have on the show
for quite some time who has been a
courageous voice for Liberty against the
National Security State and the war
machine he's an independent journalist
and also host of system update on Rumble
so make sure you guys subscribe to his
Rumble feed it is Glenn Greenwald Glenn
welcome to the
program great to be with you Charlie
thanks for having me Glenn let's start
with this anti-Semitism awareness act
bill I mean you don't like Jew hatred I
don't either but why is the federal
government sprinting to try to create
more speech restrictions and to give
money to a bureaucratic Leviathan to
restrict our freedoms and Liberties Walk
us through this there's many elements
here that I find interesting Glenn what
is your
reaction yeah so obviously if you
believe in free speech it necessarily
means you defend views not only that you
dislike but often find repellent
obviously a big Free Speech controversy
over the past decade has been attempts
to silence or control speech in the name
of stopping racism or xenophobia or
islamophobia or misogyny whatever nobody
has to say they like those things in
order to object to the censorship
efforts and the same is true with
anti-Semitism the problem of what just
happened in the house was just to to
focus narrowly on what they actually did
was there's federal anti-discrimination
law that applies to places like uh
educational institutions and uh public
accommodations where anti-discrimination
is prohibited and anti-Semitism is
already part of the body of
discrimination that is already
prohibited what the house just did was
that they adopted this massively
expansive definition of anti-semitism
that places in Europe and that Israel
has been advocating for a long time and
within this definition are examples of
the kind of
anti-Semitism that is now prohibited and
they Incorporated not only this expanded
definition into federal law but also the
examples themselves the law says
explicitly we're incorporating not just
the definition but the examples and some
of the examples are things like saying
that a particular Jewish individual
seems to have more loyalty to Israel
than the United States criticizing
Israel in a way that seems to impose on
them double standards meaning you're
criticizing them in a way that you don't
criticize other Democratic states it
prohibits you from saying that you think
Jewish people are responsible for the
death of Jesus it prohibits you from uh
comparing the behavior of the Israeli
state to some of the war crimes or
crimes against humanity committed by
Nazis now a lot of these views might be
repellent but they are absolutely within
the realm of free speech to say any of
those things and the thing that's most
disturbing is that you're allowed to do
it about any other kind of person you're
allowed to say for example that oh those
evangelicals over there seem to
prioritize Israeli interests over
American interests that's perfectly fine
you can criticize other countries in any
way you want including with double
standards the one thing you cannot do is
say this Express his opinion about any
individual who's Jewish or about the
state of of Israel in particular and
that's why it's such a direct attack on
First Amendment Free Speech rights and
that's for the reason
why I mean I don't think it's
controversial to say that DC is run by a
lot of very well organized and well
finan lobbies you have PL Parenthood and
the NRA and you know big Tech and Wall
Street and pharmaceutical companies and
the pro-israel Obby is a major force in
Washington but then you also have people
in Congress who for various religious or
cultural reasons really do love the
state of Israel and then you also have
people who believe it's an important
component of our national security which
is fine to think all those things but
that doesn't justify ass Sals on the
Free Speech rights of Americans to
protect this foreign country no and it
certainly doesn't um it doesn't support
trying to Loop in criticism of the bill
as if you're in favor of anti-Semitism a
whole another wrinkle to this which is
if you're against the bill sometimes you
want more anti-Semitism to occur so
Glenn I want to uh highlight this though
this was they speaker Johnson bypassed
the committee process so typically these
things get marked up in a committee uh
this was thrown onto the floor bypassing
a promise that he made that everyone
would have 72 hours to read the bill
this is while all the campus protests
that are happening the vast majority of
which is constitutionally protected
speech Glenn can you go deeper into kind
of the pressure campaign where it seems
DC can only agree on a couple things
spying on America borrowing money we
don't have restricting speech and
financing Wars that don't matter
Glenn yeah absolutely um first of all
let's go back to when the uh members of
the House of Representatives who
successfully removed Kevin McCarthy from
the speakership actually first they
refused to put him as Speaker until he
granted a variety of concessions that
even a lot of Democrats admitted were
necessary reforms of the house because
Nancy Pelosi before Kevin McCarthy even
and Paul Ryan before him and now uh
speaker McCarthy had Consolidated so
much power in house leadership and in
the speakership position that basically
the rest of the house were just Decora
they were just kind of there and had no
power whatsoever and obviously that's
not the way the house is supposed to
work so they demanded all these reforms
to ensure that the speaker couldn't
control everything that members of
Congress as you say had the right to
read things had the right to pass things
through committee had the right to
control what gets to the house FL Mike
Johnson even after you watched Kevin
McCarthy get deposed for violating all
those he made those promises again he is
now systematically violating almost
every one of them because he knows that
the Republicans cannot remove him
because the Democrat have promised that
as long as he serves their agenda which
he has done very Faithfully including
reversing his leld positions to do so
like opposition to more funding for the
war in Ukraine keeping that horrific war
going uh he was on my show where he
talked about the evils of warrantless
Eve dropping and said we will never
renew fisa without reforms he then led
the way to renew fisa without reforms at
the behest of the CIA in the Biden White
House he swore that the FBI does not
deserve a brand new federal head
quarters building by spending $9 billion
to build it that was one of his main
complaints about the FBI and then he
oversaw the the the appropriation of
that money so he is the protection of
the democratic party as long as he does
their bidding to do anything he wants so
he can ignore all those promises he made
to the dissatisfied members of the more
populist wi in the Republican party
because he has the protection of hakeim
Jeff and Nancy Pelosi and the rest of
them so to take this bill and throw it
onto the house floor and there were you
know overwhelming support in both
political parties there were only 21
Republicans who voted no 70 Democrats
who voted no so overwhelmingly both
caucuses agreed it's because they see
this political opportunity to claim that
there's rampant anti-Semitism in the
United States that Jewish students are
being endangered creating a kind of
moral Panic that we've had about racial
minorities or trans people that they're
you know subject to hate speech that
might incite violence or a genocide
against them and therefore we need to
control speech the same mentality just
directed to a different minority group
and there's obviously a lot of political
benefit to doing this among powerful
groups and therefore neither political
party wanted to get on the wrong side of
that so wait just two minutes in the
segment Mike Johnson went on your show
uh trying to brag about is that did I
hear that correctly that he spoke to you
about fisa protections when was that
that that's that's yeah it was just like
three months before he became speaker it
was the day that FBI director went to
the committee and he drilled them but
you know but these these were like
Charlie these were like passionate
convictions he was defending you know
weren't just throwaway lines for my show
he like elaborated on them he's a
constitutional law professor and so
imagine my amazement to watch him then
lead the way not just a yes vote but
lead the way strategize to ensure those
things
pass no I just I think that's such a
powerful point because he also came on
our show and was complaining about some
FBI thing and so we don't have a ton of
time that I've into this in this segment
but you know we debate this sometimes
what motivates these people or turns
these people I mean are they weak are
they blackmailed about minute and a half
I want to have you Riff on this Glenn
because it's our audience is like 99%
he's blackmailed and I'm not totally
convinced of that I think it's just the
weight of the security State just
collapsed him that's my working Theory
Glenn what is your
reaction yeah we do know that political
blackmail has been used by the US
Security State agencies for a long time
J Hoover had dossier on many political
uh officials that's how he was able to
run the FBI for six decades everyone was
petrified of him but I don't like to
make blackmail accusations with without
evidence and we have none in Mike
Johnson's case I think it's more that
you know when he was asked why did you
change your mind he said oh I went to a
briefing they like bring these people
into the bowels of American power you
know the situation room the like
blinking NSA room and they have people
with metals on their chest and very
powerful people come and treat them like
dignitaries and say you're in real power
now and that means being responsible and
understanding our need to spy on
Americans without Warren and they know
that that power that they now have this
kind of prestige getting into the inner
circle is dependent upon them serving an
agenda that they had long said they
oppose and human nature craves power and
they're willing to make those
compromises to do it I think that it's
that more than anything else so Glenn
let me ask you the I want to dive into
this can you talk about this kind of um
these shows that the Intel agencies put
on in these Skiffs I think this is
really important where no phone no staff
so it's just speaker Johnson we kind of
call this the woowoo show where they
kind of show you a lot but it's like
half truths and half lies from all of
your excellent reporting that you've
done what happens in these Skiffs and
how could Mike Johnson go from a fire
breath and Fourth Amendment Advocate on
the Glen green Walt show to a
capitulating bush chainy spy on
everything that moves
hack you're you're working hypothesis so
please yes yeah I remember when we were
doing the Snowden reporting which went
on for you know two and a half years and
it was we were able to show that the NSA
in secret even unbeknownst to most
members of Congress had converted the
internet into a you know range of mass
domestic warrantless surveillance
directed not just at foreign populations
but the American population as well it
was obviously a big deal it made a lot
of it was a lot very controversial
because no one knew that the US
government and the NSA were doing that
and the NSA couple months after we began
invited 60 minutes into like the secret
parts of the NSA and the 60 Minutes was
so excited you know they were like
showing the camera with the like codes
being open on the door they love all
these toys you know people get enamored
of them thinking like this is some kind
of futuristic world and they're so
grateful to be let into the inner
sanctum even though if you look at the
60 Minutes report it was just so funny
because these were just conference rooms
like with nothing in them but because
they were presented as like the secret
spaces where super important thing
happens where we see like The Situation
Room people feel good they feel like
important getting access to those you
know and and think about how Mike
Johnson is being treated like a I mean
he's third in line to the presidency now
you think he wants to go back to the
back benches of Congress so he's
obviously willing to do anything and you
know even though we're very critical a
lot of us are about these Security State
agencies there's also part of our brain
that has been inculcated for a long time
with the image that you know what
happens in the CIA what happens in the
NSA and the FBI is super sophisticated
the most highly secretive stuff you know
an important stuff that sometimes
actually does catch criminals or
terrorists or protects the country and I
think even for people who are critical
of those agencies once they're embraced
by them and once they get welcomed in
you know presented with like top secret
super secret documents they really get
hypnotized by it I I remember when Obama
ran for president 2008 he presented
himself I'm a constitutional lawyer
Americans had turned against the exess
of the war on terror he promised to
uproot all these neocon and Bush chinii
domestic abridgments of civil liberties
in the name of war and Terror and he
gets into office and within two months
you know he's in love with David
Petraeus and he has all these like
Princeton and Harvard educated Generals
in his office he loves Special Forces he
loves drones and not only did he not
uproot any of those pro programs but he
continued them and and in a lot of ways
expanded them the very programs that he
sore over and over that he based his
campaign on uprooting remember clo
Guantanamo and the all these
interrogation programs and and and none
of that happened and I think it was
because he was so enamored too that he
got to like have these secret briefings
these guys have been around for decades
they know how to manipulate newly
elected presidents or newly elected
house
speakers yeah that that's such a good
point we have to welcome back our radio
audience in a second and the Obama one
is perfect because even more than Mike
Johnson a lot of his support back in
0708 I'm going to close down gitmo I'm
going to give people a lot of time to
read bills you know it's out of control
what Bush Cheney has done and I think
that mcain was going to lose no matter
what I think it was just an Obama wave
year but the margins of power I think a
lot of people said hey I think he had a
lot of cultural Libertarians that voted
for him a lot of privacy SEC you know
concerns people that were concerned
about privacy behind him uh his support
and he did none of it in fact he was
even worse in some ways for domestic
spying and civil rights abuses um than
anything we've seen in recent memory and
so Glenn I want you to stay right there
I'm going to ask you have been you more
than anybody else impacted my views of
domestic spying you're you're um
reporting and I just wish that we'd be
able to get some legislative reform
because of it