Hunter Kozak Recounts Being the Last Person to Speak with Charlie Kirk Before Assassination at Utah Valley University

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk's Chilling Warning About Left-Wing Violence Resurfaces After His Assassination At Utah Valley University

Charlie Kirk's Chilling Warning About Left-Wing Violence Resurfaces After His Assassination At Utah Valley University

10:00

Jim Spiewak Interviews Four Witnesses to the Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University

Jim Spiewak Interviews Four Witnesses to the Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University

20:25

Kash Patel and Utah Officials Announce Arrest of Tyler Robinson for Charlie Kirk Assassination in 33 Hours

Kash Patel and Utah Officials Announce Arrest of Tyler Robinson for Charlie Kirk Assassination in 33 Hours

29:51

Hunter Kozak Recounts Being the Last Person to Speak with Charlie Kirk Before Assassination at Utah Valley University

Hunter Kozak, known as Staxioms on social media, was the last person to debate Charlie Kirk before the conservative commentator's assassination on September 10th at Utah Valley University. In this conversation with Josiah, Hunter details the moments leading up to the shooting, his question about transgender gun rights that Kirk was responding to when he was killed, and the aftermath including FBI interviews, conspiracy theories, and processing the trauma. Despite disagreeing with Kirk's politics, Hunter reflects on the tragedy, condemns political violence, and explains why he's continuing his political commentary work.

Categories: Analysis
October 31, 2025

The Last Debate Before Tragedy

Hunter Kozak was standing at the microphone, second in line to question Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10th. As a philosophy and mathematics student at UVU and political content creator, Hunter had come prepared with a specific question about the Department of Justice's stance on stripping gun rights from transgender Americans based on claims they were overrepresented in mass shootings. Kirk's response would be cut short by an assassin's bullet, making Hunter the last person Charlie Kirk ever spoke to.

Hunter and his friend Josiah, both political commentators who had known each other since their TikTok debate days, sat down weeks after the assassination to discuss what happened that day. Their conversation reveals not just the harrowing details of a political assassination, but the complex emotions of witnessing violence against someone whose politics you vehemently oppose.

Preparing the Question

Hunter wasn't just another college student looking to ask Kirk a softball question. As part of the Unfuck America tour, a group that followed Kirk's speaking events to challenge his rhetoric, Hunter had prepared a statistical analysis debunking Kirk's claims about transgender individuals and mass shootings. He had even made a TikTok video beforehand titled "Do you hate Charlie Kirk? I know I do" that garnered 500,000 views before the event.

When Turning Point staff previewed questions from those waiting in line, Hunter stood out. While others asked questions like "How does it feel to be the coolest conservative of all time?" or debated Kobe versus LeBron, Hunter wanted to discuss policy and constitutional rights. One staffer told him, "Oh, you're perfect," and moved him to second in line.

Hunter also anticipated Kirk would pivot to his signature question: "What is a woman?" Having created a video essay years earlier titled "Is a Hot Dog a Sandwich?" that explored philosophy of language and categories, Hunter felt prepared to challenge Kirk's rhetorical tactics on transgender issues.

The Moment Everything Changed

Hunter's wife stood 20-30 feet away, recording the exchange on Hunter's phone for a TikTok video they planned to post later. Hunter approached the microphone and asked Kirk about the DOJ decision regarding gun rights for transgender individuals. Kirk affirmed his support for the policy. Hunter then asked if Kirk knew how many transgender shooters there had been. Kirk responded, "Too many." Hunter clarified there had been about four or five, then asked if Kirk knew how many shootings had occurred in America over the last decade. Kirk's response—"Counting or not counting gang violence?"—would be his last words.

The shot rang out. Hunter's immediate reaction revealed an almost analytical clarity even in the chaos. As someone targeted for being a liberal voice on a conservative campus, Hunter realized he likely wasn't in danger from a shooter targeting conservatives. Still, the visceral horror of what he'd just witnessed was undeniable. He dropped to the ground along with others in line, people he'd been talking with for the previous hour and a half.

Hunter recalled a quote from YouTuber Hank Green about receiving a cancer diagnosis: "I'm still me." Despite the trauma unfolding, Hunter remained cogent enough to process what was happening. He checked on those around him, and a kind man behind him walked with Hunter to make sure he was okay. In the confusion, that same person ended up keeping Hunter's MAGA hat—one of the hats Turning Point had been distributing that Hunter had grabbed but didn't want to wear while asking his question.

Twenty Minutes of Terror

Hunter's wife had his better phone for recording, and he'd put it on Do Not Disturb mode to prevent interruptions during his question. Now he called her five or six times with no response. For twenty agonizing minutes, Hunter searched for her in the dispersing crowd. At one point, desperate, he approached the crime scene where a police officer told him bluntly, "This isn't about you, buddy." Hunter acknowledged the officer was right and continued searching until they finally reconnected.

The campus erupted in chaos. It was the middle of the day on a Wednesday, and the entire university flooded out of buildings. Cars were jam-packed trying to leave. In one of those packed cars, not driving, Hunter's first instinct was to look up information about Charlie Kirk's family. He discovered Kirk had two children. As a father of two himself, that hit Hunter hard. Despite their vast political differences, they shared something fundamental—they were both political advocates who cared about debate and conversation, both married fathers trying to make sense of the world.

Investigations and Interrogations

The immediate aftermath brought confusion and fear. Hunter spoke to campus police about half an hour after the shooting, giving his information and offering to answer any questions. His wife sent all their video footage to campus police. Hunter thought that would be sufficient, but then Utah's governor was asked about "that guy who was asking the question" and responded that authorities didn't know who that person was. That information had apparently gotten lost somewhere in the chaos.

Hunter realized he needed legal representation. He hired an attorney who outlined all the possibilities of what could happen, which only heightened his anxiety. His attorney reached out to the FBI to arrange an interview. The timing couldn't have been worse—Hunter's newborn daughter was in the NICU. He found himself conducting a video conference interview with the FBI in the hospital parking lot, twenty minutes after getting the call, juggling federal questions about an assassination while his infant fought for health inside.

The FBI interview itself was professional and relatively straightforward. They wanted to know Hunter's location immediately before and after the incident, though they already had access to all campus security cameras to verify his answers. Hunter was never treated as a suspect or mirandized, but the experience was nonetheless frightening, especially with his attorney preparing him for worst-case scenarios.

Conspiracy Theories and Threats

Beyond the official investigations, Hunter faced an onslaught of conspiracy theories. As a liberal who had publicly stated he hated Charlie Kirk, who was asking a question about gun violence when Kirk was shot, Hunter became a target for armchair detectives convinced he was somehow involved. Comments flooded his social media claiming they "knew" he did it and threatening to turn him in to the FBI. Hunter found these easy enough to dismiss—he'd already been cooperating with authorities more than any of his accusers.

More disturbing were the visitors to his home. The New York Times showed up at his door the same day as the shooting, somehow having found his address and name. Over the following days, approximately twenty reporters knocked on his door. Then came someone who didn't act like a reporter at all, someone whose presence genuinely frightened Hunter. He scared the person off but spent the next week barricading doors and consumed with anxiety—unusual for someone who typically isn't paranoid or anxious.

For someone whose entire online presence involved debate and political advocacy, Hunter seriously considered walking away from it all. He had made a video before the event that got 500,000 views saying he hated Charlie Kirk. He knew a narrative would quickly be spun if he didn't speak out, so even though he wanted to process the trauma privately with his family, he felt compelled to make statements and do interviews for the first four or five days. After that necessity passed, he stepped back entirely to focus on family and school.

The Weight of Being a Witness

Utah Valley University provided Hunter with free therapy, which he gratefully accepted. In those sessions, he processed not just the trauma of witnessing an assassination, but the strange responsibility of being the last person Kirk spoke to. Hunter felt he needed to condemn what happened—not just because it was awful, but because copycat violence is a real concern. Yet he also refused to sanitize or launder what Kirk stood for.

Hunter acknowledged respecting Kirk for specific things: his political organization skills were exceptional, having organized the Republican Party and media landscape in ways the left hasn't replicated. Kirk also believed in the marketplace of ideas and the importance of debate and conversation—values Hunter shares deeply. As someone who makes content about how to have conversations with conservatives while living in conservative Utah, Hunter saw some common ground.

But Hunter went to that event specifically because Kirk was advocating for stripping constitutional rights from a disenfranchised minority. Holding both truths together—condemning the violence while not whitewashing Kirk's advocacy—proved difficult. Hunter noted that some people aren't able to do both, and that frustration came through in his words.

What helped Hunter maintain perspective was remembering Kirk's children. Hunter didn't even know Kirk had kids until he looked it up in that packed car after the shooting. Kirk's children were impacted infinitely more than Hunter would ever be, and they lacked the mental capabilities to comprehend or handle what happened. Hunter's heart went out to those kids, recognizing that despite being nothing like Charlie Kirk in most ways, they shared similarities—similar height, married with two kids, interested in politics, advocates who cared about debate and policy.

Returning to the Arena

Six weeks after the assassination, Hunter finally started making videos again. His first content back focused on his true passion: linguistics and philosophy of language. He breaks down fallacies, logic, debate techniques, and how to communicate across political divides in what he describes as a more friendly way than academic lectures. His unique voice in political commentary combines analytical philosophy, mathematics, and genuine humor—a perspective that makes political spaces better.

Hunter's video essay "Is a Hot Dog a Sandwich?" exemplifies his approach, using seemingly trivial questions to explore deeper issues of categories, definitions, and language—the same tools needed to dissect questions like "What is a woman?" It's content that's simultaneously entertaining and intellectually rigorous, mixing political analysis with discussions of Star Wars (though Hunter maintains the controversial opinion that Rise of Skywalker is a top-five Star Wars film, much to his friend's horror).

Political Violence and Democratic Values

The assassination of Charlie Kirk represents one of the biggest political events of the decade, putting every content creator and political commentator in danger regardless of their ideology. Hunter's experience illustrates the complex emotions involved in witnessing violence against someone whose politics you oppose. He refuses to simplify the situation into easy narratives.

In a constitutional democratic republic, there are countless means to express displeasure with someone's views—debate, voting, organizing, creating content. Violence is not among those legitimate options. Yet condemning violence doesn't require pretending Kirk wasn't a hypocrite or that his advocacy didn't cause damage. Both things can be true simultaneously.

Hunter's return to political commentary after such trauma demonstrates the importance of persisting despite danger. His unique perspective—combining philosophy, mathematics, and lived experience as someone who was literally there—enriches political discourse. His willingness to have conversations with conservatives while maintaining his progressive values, to find common ground on the importance of debate while never compromising on core principles, represents exactly the kind of voice needed in polarized times.

The Ongoing Impact

Hunter continues his studies at Utah Valley University, working toward dual degrees in philosophy and mathematics. He's raising two children with his wife, who stood recording what she thought would be routine debate footage but instead captured historical tragedy. He makes videos about linguistics and logic and how language shapes political discourse. He lives in Utah, surrounded by the conservative neighbors he's built a platform around conversing with respectfully.

And he carries the weight of being the last person Charlie Kirk ever spoke to, of asking the last question Kirk ever answered, of standing at the microphone when everything changed. It's a responsibility he takes seriously, refusing easy answers or simplified narratives. Hunter condemns the violence while critiquing the politics. He respects Kirk's organizational genius while opposing his advocacy. He processes his trauma while continuing his work. He remembers Kirk's children while honoring his own values.

The assassination happened. The trauma is real. The conspiracy theories persist. The work continues. Hunter Kozak remains in the arena, armed not with weapons but with philosophical rigor, statistical analysis, and the conviction that conversation and debate—however imperfect—remain the only legitimate tools for change in a democracy. Even after witnessing firsthand what happens when that principle is violated.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!