Ilhan Omar, AOC, and Jasmine Crockett Double Down on Charlie Kirk Attacks After His Death

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

House Democrats Vote Against Honoring Charlie Kirk After His Assassination Sparks National Outcry

House Democrats Vote Against Honoring Charlie Kirk After His Assassination Sparks National Outcry

48:03

Andrew Kolvet and Chris Cuomo Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy and Rising Political Violence in America

Andrew Kolvet and Chris Cuomo Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy and Rising Political Violence in America

19:01

Bill O'Reilly Explains Why Progressive Left Hatred Gets Amplified More Than Conservative Rhetoric in America

Bill O'Reilly Explains Why Progressive Left Hatred Gets Amplified More Than Conservative Rhetoric in America

7:35

Ilhan Omar, AOC, and Jasmine Crockett Double Down on Charlie Kirk Attacks After His Death

Democratic Representatives Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Jasmine Crockett faced criticism for their continued attacks on Charlie Kirk following his death. Omar stated on CNN that Kirk's legacy "should be in the dustbin of history," while AOC condemned what she called his "ignorant rhetoric" in response to a House tribute resolution. Crockett claimed Kirk's rhetoric specifically targeted people of color, noting that most Democrats who voted against honoring Kirk were minorities. Critics argue these politicians are sharing quotes either completely fabricated or taken out of context, with some clips showing Kirk quoting others he was criticizing. The controversy highlights the ongoing political divide over how to respond to Kirk's death and legacy.

Categories: Analysis
September 23, 2025

Democratic Representatives Attack Charlie Kirk's Legacy

Ilhan Omar doubled down on her criticism of Charlie Kirk, stating his legacy "belongs in the dustbin of history." Speaking on CNN, Omar addressed the controversy surrounding her comments about Kirk following his death.

When asked about the jarring nature of criticizing someone who was a husband and father in the immediate aftermath of his death, Omar defended her position. "What I find jarring is that there's so many people willing to excuse the most reprehensible things that he said that they agree with, that they're willing to have monuments for him, that they want to create a day to honor him and that they want to produce resolutions in the House of Congress honoring his life and legacy," Omar said.

She continued: "It is one thing to care about his life because obviously so many people loved him, including his children and wife, but I am not going to sit here and be judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man has left behind that should be in the dustbin of history and we should hopefully move on and forget the hate that he spewed every single day."

AOC Joins Criticism Over House Tribute

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also condemned what she called the "ignorant rhetoric" of Charlie Kirk in response to the House tribute resolution. In her statement, AOC made several accusations about Kirk's past statements and beliefs.

"We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was: a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act granted black Americans the right to vote was a mistake. Who after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi claimed that some amazing patriot out there should bail out his assailant and accused Jews of controlling not just the colleges, it's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it," AOC stated.

She added: "His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans, far from working tirelessly to promote unity as asserted by the majority in this resolution. We can condemn his horrific assassination and the scourge of political violence without uplifting these ideas."

Questions About Accuracy of Shared Quotes

Critics note that many of the comments being shared as Charlie Kirk quotes are either completely fabricated or taken out of context. Some appear to be generated by AI, while others show Kirk quoting someone else while criticizing that person, not expressing his own views.

Despite these discrepancies, Democratic representatives continue to use these quotes to justify their opposition to honoring Kirk. The situation raises questions about the responsibility to verify information, even when discussing controversial political figures.

Jasmine Crockett Explains Her Vote Against the Resolution

Representative Jasmine Crockett appeared on CNN to explain why she was among the 58 Democrats who voted against the House resolution honoring Charlie Kirk. She pointed out a demographic pattern in the voting.

"One of the things I do want to point out that's not been laid out that honestly hurts my heart, when I saw the no votes, there were only two Caucasians. For the most part, the only people that voted no were people of color," Crockett said.

She explained: "Because the rhetoric that Charlie Kirk continuously put out there was rhetoric that specifically targeted people of color. And so it is unfortunate that even our colleagues could not see how harmful his rhetoric was specifically to us. So if there was any way that I was going to honor somebody who decided that they were just going to negatively talk about me and proclaim that I was somehow involved in the great white replacement, yeah, I'm not honoring that kind of stuff."

The Political Divide Over Responding to Death

The controversy illustrates the deep political divide in how Americans respond to the death of public figures they disagree with. Critics argue that these Democratic representatives are demonstrating an inability to separate their political disagreements from basic human decency in the wake of a violent death.

The situation also highlights what some see as a troubling trend of politicians acting more like social media influencers than serious legislators, prioritizing viral moments and partisan attacks over respectful discourse, even in the aftermath of tragedy.

The debate continues over whether it's possible to condemn political violence while maintaining strong disagreements with someone's political views and legacy. These three Democratic representatives suggest it is possible, though their critics argue their actions demonstrate otherwise.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!