Up Next
Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly Discuss Why Charlie Kirk's Kindness Made Him a Target
11:16
Candace Owens and Ana Kasparian Unite Against Elite Control, War Propaganda, and Zionist Intimidation Tactics
1:25:29
Brandon Tatum Honors Charlie Kirk's Birthday, Confronts False Accusations and Barack Obama's Divisive Legacy
1:26:29
Officer Tatum Defends Charlie Kirk's Israel Stance Against Megyn Kelly's Mischaracterization of His Final Beliefs
Officer Tatum pushes back against Megyn Kelly's portrayal of Charlie Kirk as donor-controlled and reluctant to discuss Israel. Tatum presents video evidence showing Kirk openly criticizing the Israeli government on multiple platforms, arguing that while Kirk became more critical of Netanyahu's government, he never abandoned his support for Israel's right to exist. Tatum questions why Kelly and others are rewriting Kirk's positions when his widow, Erika Kirk, hasn't made these claims herself.
Megyn Kelly's Controversial Claims About Charlie Kirk
Officer Tatum addresses what he sees as a troubling trend of people mischaracterizing Charlie Kirk's positions on Israel following his death. Megyn Kelly recently suggested on her show that Kirk was hesitant to discuss Israel publicly due to donor pressure, while simultaneously claiming he encouraged Tucker Carlson backstage to "go all the way" in criticizing Israel at Turning Point events.
Tatum, who admires Kelly's work since she left mainstream media, expresses disappointment in her decision to side with what he calls "foolery" on this topic. He notes that Kelly criticized Kirk for not leading robust discussions on Israel due to donor concerns and proximity to the Trump administration, while conveniently omitting that Kirk refused to debate Nick Fuentes, calling him "vermin."
The Tucker Carlson Backstage Story Doesn't Add Up
Kelly played a clip from Tucker Carlson describing an extensive backstage conversation with Kirk before a Turning Point event. According to Carlson, he was "fulminating and getting all red in the face" discussing neocons and Iran, and told Kirk he wouldn't discuss certain Israel-related topics to avoid upsetting donors. Carlson claims Kirk looked at him and said, "Go all the way. Do it," which Carlson says he'll never forget.
However, Tatum points out a major discrepancy. Kelly then showed actual backstage footage of Kirk briefly interrupting a conversation between her and Carlson to say "Go Max" right before Tucker went on stage. In the video, Tucker barely acknowledges Kirk and quickly returns to his conversation with Kelly. Tatum argues these cannot be the same conversation Carlson described, questioning why Kelly is trying to connect them.
Officer Tatum's Personal Experience With Kirk Backstage
Tatum shares his own similar backstage interaction with Charlie Kirk. As Tatum was being prepped to go on stage, Kirk came off and asked if he was going to talk about Epstein. When Tatum confirmed he would, Kirk told him to "go all in" because Kirk himself couldn't address it due to his relationships with the Trump administration and Don Jr. Tatum interpreted this as Kirk being loyal to his connections, not as evidence Kirk had changed his fundamental beliefs about anything.
Tatum emphasizes that if anyone should speak about Kirk's true beliefs, it should be his widow, Erika Kirk. He questions why others are speculating and essentially rewriting Kirk's positions when Erika hasn't made these claims herself. He even considers reaching out to Erika to ask if she wants him to set the record straight.
Video Evidence: Charlie Kirk Openly Criticized Israel
To counter the narrative that Kirk was afraid to criticize Israel due to donors, Tatum presents multiple video clips. In the first, from the Patrick Bet-David podcast, Kirk openly questions whether there was a stand-down order during the October 7th attacks. Kirk expresses disbelief that it took six hours for the IDF to respond when the country is the size of New Jersey and a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to Gaza takes only 45 minutes. Kirk states these are "legitimate non-conspiracy questions."
Tatum provides context from his own interview with an IDF colonel who explained the delay was due to resources being focused on the northern border, the Rosh Hashanah holiday, and initial underestimation of the attack's scale. The colonel said they thought it was a small terrorist incursion, not 7,000 terrorists. Tatum puts this in perspective by comparing it to American active shooter situations, noting how much damage one person can do, let alone 7,000.
Kirk's Criticism of the Israeli Government, Not Israel's Existence
In another clip from Patrick Bet-David's show, Kirk discusses how Netanyahu and the Israeli hard-right government have a mandate and states, "I got to be careful the way I say this... they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza." Kirk acknowledges Israel has a mandate to seek justice after the attacks but raises serious questions about the situation.
Tatum emphasizes a crucial distinction: Charlie Kirk became more critical of the Israeli government, not of Israel's right to exist. Kirk wrote a letter to Benjamin Netanyahu with constructive criticism. He disagreed with Israel's government pushing LGBTQ policies and other issues. But he never changed his Zionist belief in Israel's right to exist.
In a final clip, Kirk criticizes Jewish donors, stating they "have a lot of explaining to do" because they've been the "number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies." Kirk says, "This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews."
The Real Issue: Why Are People Obsessed With Rewriting Kirk's Beliefs?
Tatum argues that anyone with a brain can criticize secular Jews just as they can criticize any group, comparing it to criticizing Black people who continue voting for Democrats. He points out that Kirk said these things openly, in front of the world, which contradicts the narrative that he was afraid to speak due to donor pressure.
Tatum questions why Kelly and others have a "vested interest in recreating Charlie Kirk's belief systems." He notes that Kirk's positions on Israel evolved to become more critical of the government, but people are trying to claim he completely changed his fundamental beliefs. Tatum suggests Kelly is siding with the current "momentum" of anti-Israel sentiment in certain conservative circles rather than accurately representing Kirk's actual positions.
He acknowledges that the momentum is currently against him, Ben Shapiro, and other Zionists, but expresses confidence that "the tide will turn." Tatum concludes by emphasizing that people need to stop obsessing over Israel and lying about Kirk's positions, especially when his widow hasn't made any of these claims herself.
Video Transcript
Megan Kelly, why are you doing this?
>> Charlie was all for really robust
discussions of very tough issues,
including Israel and beyond. It's just
he wouldn't necessarily lead them
because he did have donors and he also
was very close with the administration.
Now, I got more evidence that I want to
share with you real quick because for
them to insinuate that Charlie was like
afraid of his donors to get on stage and
criticize Israel. [music]
Do I need to show you exhibit A, B, and
C? I guess I do. Like and subscribe to
the channel. Hit the bell so you get
notifications anytime I go live and make
a video. Make sure you're still
subscribed to this channel and also
subscribe to my Espano channel. Let's
get into this. Megan Kelly, come on in.
I like Megan Kelly. I have always liked
Megan Kelly. Not always. When she was
working on Fox, I I couldn't stand it.
When she was doing that that debate with
Donald Trump, I I I wanted to I wanted
her to go away. But when when she left
the mainstream, I love her podcast. I
listen to it all the time. I think she
have a lot of insightful things to say.
But for whatever reason, Megan Kelly is
making a decision to side
on foolery on some of these topics. I
mean, absolutely foolery. I don't know
why these people have a vested interest
in recreating Charlie Kirk's belief
systems. They like they obsessed with
trying to He can't speak for himself.
Can y'all let his wife talk for him? If
Erica wanted the world to know that
Charlie was abandoned in Israel or
something, I think his wife has the
right to say it and prove it. You
everybody else that's talking is
speculating.
And if if Erica is not speculating, why
are y'all speculating? And it's not that
he changed his beliefs on anything other
than Israel. Why are y'all so obsessed
with Israel? People like me wouldn't
even be talking about Israel if it
wasn't for people lying and being weird
about Israel every day. Let me ask you
something. Have you ever Googled your
own name? Do it sometime. You'll be
shocked how much of your private
information is out there. Your address,
your phone number, and even your family
details. And here's the crazy part. Data
brokers and random websites are selling
your information without your consent.
That's where Incogn comes in. Incogn
tracks down and removes your personal
data from hundreds of data broker sites,
the ones that collect, sell, and repost
your information for profit. And now
when Incogn's custom data removal, you
can maximize your online privacy. That
means if you find your personal
information on any site, you can just
send Incogn link and their privacy
experts will handle the rest. It's
really that simple. Remember, a VPN
protects your data going out, but Incogn
removes what already is out there. And
they can't harm you if they can't find
you. This isn't some shady privacy
gimmick. Incogn's custom data removal
process was verified by Deoid, proving
they actually get results. Take your
personal data back with Incogn. Use code
Tatum and get 60% off an annual plan at
incogn.com/tatum.
That's incogn.com/tatum.
Protect your privacy today. So, Megan
Kelly has decided on this topic to take
the side of the people that have
momentum right now.
She will not criticize Tucker Carlson
for the asinine things that he's done.
She should be all over him with that
stupid interview and all the other
interviews that he's done.
You can like a person and call him out.
I like Megan Kelly, but I got to I got
to say something about this
and siding when she refused to say
anything about others.
Refuse to It's There's a difference
between
not want to name people and call them
out because really it's not about the
person, it's about what they're doing.
It's a difference between not want to
name a person but calling out the
garbage that you see versus you don't
want to name them and you don't want to
call out the garbage. Y'all remember
when that when Netanyahu uh that letter
that Charlie wrote to Netanyahu came out
and people had been lying about the
context of it. Megan Kelly didn't say
nothing about that. I didn't see on her
show. She said nothing about it.
That's interesting. No, no, no. It's not
just interesting. People completely lied
about the whole thing. All right, let's
get to the Megan Kelly show. So, Megan
Kelly goes on to insinuate, in my
personal opinion, of this new conversion
story of Charlie Kirk and how he was
backstage
as if he was telling Tucker Carlson, "Go
for it, bro. Bash Israel in front of
this whole audience."
I'mma let it play. Let her statement
come out. And then we gonna talk about
Tucker too on this a little bit because
either Tucker lied
or he's talking about a whole different
conversation that him and Charlie had.
Let's start with the bigger Kelly clip.
Let's roll the first clip.
>> Charlie, he was important. He was hugely
important to the conservative movement,
but he didn't do it by discouraging
debate or trying to tell one faction
they couldn't or shouldn't say something
or not saber rattling on something that
was like a sacred cow of the
administrations. He [snorts] didn't
always do it, but he wanted those
discussions to happen. I don't think
Charlie would be upset about the debate
that's generally happening between, say,
Tucker and Ben Shapiro right now in
Israel. He would not like how nasty it's
getting. You know, he definitely would
not support calls to have Tucker, you
know, people to stop watching Tucker.
Ben's not asking for him to be
deplatformed, but clearly he wants him
cut out of polite conservative movement
circles. He would not be in favor of
that. He knew what Tucker was saying,
including about Israel, and continued to
invite him to turning point events. And
so, I just wanted to tell this story
because I think people are
misunderstanding like I'll let her
finish it. Give me 20 seconds. She She
conveniently left out Nick Fuentes. Why,
Megan? Why? Now, I'm not telling you how
you run your show, but why did you leave
out Nick Fuentes? You say uh Charlie was
open for No, he wasn't. He wasn't always
open for anybody to have a conversation
with anybody. Charlie didn't debate just
anybody. And he did not debate Nick
Fees. And he said Nick Fuentes was
vermin that he refused to debate Nick
Fuentes. said it to I I heard him say
it. He said it on the stage in front of
the world and he never debated Nick
Fuentes. Nick Fentes went on for years
complaining that Charlie wouldn't debate
him. He got mad at Desh Douza for
debating Nick Fuentes. Megan, why are
you saying this? I don't get it. Finish
the clip.
>> Charlie was all for really robust
discussions of very tough issues,
including Israel and beyond. It's just
he wouldn't necessarily lead them
because he did have donors and he also
was very close with the administration.
>> Okay, let's go to the next clip.
>> This is got criticized by the pro-Israel
crowd for his remarks at the turning
point event. Charlie also had threats
from donors thereafter saying if you
don't get rid of Tucker Carlson like
we're done. and he had received some
threats about that even before Tucker's
appearance and and he said, "Well, I'm
bringing him anyway."
>> And that's all been documented. This is
kind of water under the bridge, but
>> which which I think that it's fair to
say that I do not think that was the
right decision for Charlie to do. But
Charlie is loyal and he don't want to
get bullied. So, if you're going to
bully him, you're going to make him do
something whether it's right or wrong. I
I I don't think it makes sense in the
context of Turning Point for Charlie to
defy the the people who have supported
to get this fool on the stage. Like if
we're talking about somebody else maybe,
but he on the stage being stupid.
So I I just disagree with that. That
don't mean I didn't like Charlie.
Whatever. I love Charlie, but I disagree
with that aspect of it. I think he
should have just left Tucker out. But I
do understand the loyalty aspect of it.
I I understand that point. It's not I'm
not missed on that point. Roll it.
>> I'm showing it to you for a different
purpose. Tucker on that broadcast said
the following about his backstage
conversations with Charlie before he
went out there.
>> Hold on. Now, I want y'all Hold on. Let
it get to him real quick. Let it
>> Now, I want y'all to pay attention to
this. This is This is very important to
acknowledge.
Either Tucker completely lied about this
or Megan Kelly and Tucker in this clip
that she played is unrelated.
One of the two happened because what
Tucker is getting ready to describe is
nothing near
what Megan Kelly is showing in this
clip. I don't know why she's trying to
put this together. She could just talk
about something else. Why you trying to
put this together? It actually looks
like Tucker brushed Charlie off.
It looked like he was like, "All right,
I'm talking to somebody else. What? All
right, whatever. Go for it." Max. Max,
wait till I show you. Wait till I show
you guys. Wrote this clip
>> at speech that I gave in July. We had a
conversation about this backstage right
before I went on.
>> Right before you.
>> And I was fulminating and getting all
red in the face like I often do to my
shame. And I was mad thinking about this
and thinking about uh the effort by the
neocons in the United States to draw us
in to another forever war with Iran.
It's not a defense of Iran, of course.
It's merely an acknowledgement that
we've done this before.
>> Pause.
>> But just admit you were wrong, you
idiot.
You and all these other fools
fearmongered us in we're gonna get into
Iran war. Trump said he wasn't going to
do it.
you fake MAGA people who who supported
Trump and then you turn your back on
Trump because it has something to do
with Israel. It's they turned on him
because of they weren't wor worried
about the Iranian war. We they know we
weren't going to start a war. He killed
Solommani in cold blood and laughed at
him and Iran didn't attack us. They know
better. They don't want that smoke with
us. And so when Donald Trump made the
strategic uh decision to do what he did,
we know we weren't going to get into
war. I told y'all we weren't going to
get into war. He know we weren't going
to get into war. But they hate Jews in
Israel so much that they are willing to
turn on Trump over this that never
happened. When is he going to apologize
and say I was wrong. I was completely
wrong. I had no evidence that it was
going to happen. I just said it anyway
to fearmonger because I hate Israel.
Wrote a clip
>> happened in Iraq which uh you know we we
entered into uh at the behest of those
same foreign policy strategists. Um, and
>> Trump wasn't work. And so I was going on
at some length backstage with Charlie.
>> And I said, uh, you know, probably not
going to talk about that. I'm not going
to torture you. I know your donors hate
this when I say that. Um, and also
Epstein was in the news and it was clear
to me that,
>> you know, Epstein's probably not like a
MSAD agent or something, but Epstein
clearly had contact with Israeli
intelligence and American intelligence
and French intelligence, but the only
one you're not allowed to talk about is
Israeli intelligence. But it's it seemed
true to me and I had done uh some work
on that and I knew a bunch of people
pretty close to that story. So So I
thought that and I said that to Charlie
and I said, "But I'm not going to say
that because I don't want to make your
donors mad. I know it's just going to be
like an endless
flurry of texts telling you to stop or
you're going to lose a bunch of
funding." And he looked at me, I'll
never forget it, and said, "Go all the
way. Do it. Go all the way." I said,
"Man, I you know, a lot of things I can
talk about. I don't need to talk about
that." and he said, "Do it." So, I did
it.
>> Now, now
maybe I'm but
this is a whole He said, "I'm back there
fuming.
I'm back there turning red in the face.
They had a full conversation." And then
Charlie tells him, and he's never going
to forget, "Go for it." Now, let's look
at the clip that Megan Kelly is showing
because
this GoFool Max,
I mean, they must be talking about two
different conversations because this Go
Fool Max backstage before he speaks is
nothing like what we f to see in this
video. Roll the clip.
>> And here's the thing, Stu. I was
recently going through some old pictures
to find one of me and Charlie that I
knew we took at that event. And not only
did I find pictures of me and Charlie,
>> but I found a video of me, Tucker, and
Charlie
speaking backstage right before Tucker
went out.
>> Tucker and I were talking. Charlie came
over and interrupted for just a second.
Him on this tape, which I've listened to
many times. is very clear on my phone,
less clear here probably as we play it,
but he says to to Tucker, "Go Max." He
interrupts the conversation because he
has to say to Tucker something. And what
was so important to him to tell Tucker
was go Max. Here it is. Hold on. Hold
on. Time out. Time. Hold on. Okay.
[laughter]
He said this is what Okay, look. Go Max.
That mean that this happened before
Tucker went on stage. Right. Tucker was
saying he was in this deep theological
conversation with Charlie Kirk before he
went up on stage.
Right here, Megan Kelly is saying that's
her and she's talking to Tucker. So when
is this Charlie Kirk conversation
happening? I'm not saying it didn't, but
this don't match what he was saying. Now
watch Tucker cost in the way he treat
Charlie Kirk. He's talking to Megan
Kelly.
Charlie comes up. I I want you to fir
We're gonna play this video maybe twice,
three times. First, I want you to listen
to what Charlie said, the go Max thing,
right? Cuz it's B. You can barely hear
it, but that's what he says. And then I
want you to watch it again a second
time. And I want you to just watch
Tucker's
expression with Charlie.
Roll the clip.
Go back, bro.
It's like he didn't even, you know, when
you talk to somebody, you like like when
when Charlie and I got to tell y'all
this. Charlie said something to me
backstage very similar to this.
Let's play it again. Just watch Tucker's
reaction. Can you make it full screen
that that picture? Cuz I want y'all to
see this. Watch Tucker's reaction to
Charlie.
Is he interested or not interested? The
question wrote a clip.
>> Here it is.
>> It's quick. It's just happened.
[clears throat]
>> Whoa.
He said go Max. You know what I saw in
that video? Go back one more time. This
is what I saw in that video. Full
screen. They don't need to see my
beautiful face. This is what I saw in
that video. I saw that Charlie wanted to
have it. Stop. Pause here. Charlie
wanted it on record that he told Tucker
to go Max. If you look at it, there's a
person set up clearly
this that's filming
this interaction.
When Charlie says what he says, he
looked directly at the camera. And I I I
don't know if it's because he's he
orchestrated this because Charlie does
stuff like this. Obviously, you want to
go viral. They want to have these
moments. This is what they do. There's
nothing wrong with it. But I think
that's what this was. This was a video
of Charlie saying that him wanted on
camera that he had a moment to tell
Tucker to go Max, but unfortunately
Tucker was not interested enough to give
him the time of day and he just blew he
kind of kind of like uh whatever. And
went back to having a conversation with
Megan Kelly. Roll the clip.
It's like he kind of wanted the more of
a conversation, didn't it? It's like
It's like he said, "Go Max and he kind
of stood there and was like,
am I going to talk to Megan Kelly and
all and then Tucker just turned didn't
even pay attention to him to be honest.
He kind of blew him off." Now, why do I
bring this up? Because I think Megan
Kelly is is insinuating something
because she has to be on this side of
it. She can't be on the Ben Shapiro side
because that's not where the momentum is
at. The momentum is not with me, Ben
Shapiro, and other Zionists. We don't
have momentum right now. People are
hating us right now, but it the tide
will turn, trust me. But the momentum is
on that side. So, she needs to
capitulate capitulate to that side.
Charlie Kirk backstage said a similar
thing to me. He came off stage. I'm
getting I'm setting up cuz when when you
come off stage, they set you up with the
mic and they prep you. So when he come
off, they let you go on. He comes off
like he always do when I see him
backstage and he says something to me.
I'm like, "What's up, bro? Good to see
you." Or whatever. And he go, "Are you
going to talk about Israel?" I mean, not
Israel. You going to talk about uh um
Epstein? And I say, "Of course." You
know, I don't care what they want me to
talk. I'm going to talk about what I
want to talk about. But he mentioned it
and I was kind of confused because I was
like, I didn't think it was a big deal.
But he's like, "You want to talk about
Epstein?" I'm like, "Yeah, of course."
He like, "Go all in." like like go all
in, bro. Like cuz I can't do it. Go all
in. And the way and I think none of it
obviously until he dies and then
everybody's making this stuff up about
his death. And the way I took it in the
moment was that it was obviously the
biggest controversy at the time was
Epstein. The fact they was bull corning
around with the foul. Donald Trump was
being weird about it. He was doing all
this old crazy stuff blaming Republicans
saying don't even you ain't a Republican
if you you know if you care about this
stuff. and after all the administration
was putting out fake binders and all
kind of stuff. So people were pissed,
man. I was too. That's one of the things
I disagree with Trump. The way he
handled Epstein files. I just I disagree
with him. I thought I think he messed up
in that in that area. That's why all
this stuff is going on. But that's what
I I I took Charlie to represent was that
I can't get out there and blast Epstein
because I got all of this. I got Trump
administration who I'm close to. I got
Don Jr. all these people I'm friends
with and so I don't want to get out
there and blast this topic and make
Donald Trump look bad. Personally me, I
don't care. I'm not trying to make you
look bad. I got to tell it like it
either because Trump don't care about
telling like it is either. So neither am
I. I don't care. So I get out there and
say my thing or whatever. We come on
stage. Hey Tatum, you killed it. All
this sort of stuff. So why are they
trying to make it bigger than what it
really was? Why is this Why is this push
Why don't you just call Erica?
Why? Why? Why can't Matter of fact, I'm
I might talk to Erica. I I haven't been
trying to say nothing to Erica about
this. Her husband's dead. Like, what
what we need to talk about this for? She
don't She ain't mention it, so she she
must not It must not be that important
for her to mention. It wasn't important
to Charlie and it wasn't important to
his wife. That's why she ain't said
nothing. But there's a part of me that's
like, Erica,
just if Do you want me to say anything?
I won't say nothing. If you tell me, if
you tell me something and tell me not
tell anybody, I won't say nothing. If
you need me to say something you can't
say, I'll say it. I don't give a flying
flip. I want to know like what do you
think about this stuff that they're
doing? Why are they characterizing
Charlie as a certain way? Now, I got
more evidence that I want to share with
you real quick because for them to
insinuate that Charlie was like afraid
of his donors to get on stage and
criticize Israel. Do I need to show you
exhibit A, B, and C? I guess I do. Come
on, pull up that clip. Clip 104.
This is Charlie at the Patrick Bid David
on the Patrick BDavid podcast. Now you
tell me, does Charlie seem like
he Now he does seem a little hesitant,
but he said it anyway.
Do you do it seem to you like he would
cannot speak on this or his donors are
going to do nothing? He did it right
here. Wrote a clip. Netanyahu now has an
emergency government and a mandate to
lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to
go so far that saying that Netanyahu
knew or there was intelligence here, but
I think some questions need to be asked.
Was there a standown order?
Was there a standown order?
6 hours. I don't believe it. Israel's
the side of New Jersey. When I took a
helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the
Gaza border, it's 45 minutes.
>> Wow.
>> 6 hours. They're live streaming the
killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the
government say stand down? That is a
legitimate non-conspiracy
question. The whole country is the IDF.
>> The whole country is.
>> Yeah.
>> And you're trying to tell me that
they're going to concerts and kabutzes
and schools and by reports six hours.
Let's say it's three hours.
>> That's suspect.
>> Go ahead, Rob.
>> It's also not like a rightwing uh
reporting. This is from the New York
Times. the long wait for help.
>> So, openly he's criticizing Israel. I
knew Charlie. Now, I I wasn't I didn't I
wasn't talking to him like right before
he died. So, I don't really know what
where he was thinking about it at the
time. I do know that he was with Josh
Hammer and a rabbi who messaged me and
they were on a text thread with him
prepping him to defend Israel at UVU the
day before he went there. So, clearly he
hadn't abandoned Israel. openly
criticized. I think that's a good
question to ask. I think there's answers
to that question. Interview people in
the IDF. I interviewed a guy at Pastor
Alan Jackson's church who was a a
colonel in the IDF and he had made
mention that he do not believe that it
was a standown order. What happened? It
was way more complicated than they
thought it was. Right. They put all
their resources uh in the north because
they were afraid of the invasion coming
from the north, not necessarily Gaza.
Then they had a special holiday,
Rashashana. I think a special holiday
and it was it was Shabbat. So they got
their pants all the way down
before this attack happened. And the the
colonel was saying that they came over,
it was an alert went out that it was a
terrorist attack, but they didn't
realize the scale of it. They thought it
was a couple terrorists that came over
and they were combed
um by the by the police force and other
people in the kabuts. It was a fight
going on. He didn't think it was that
many people. They thought it was a small
incursion. They didn't realize it was
7,000 terrorists. You know how crazy
that is? I want y'all to put this in
perspective real quick and I'll get to
some more evidence. Do you know how
crazy 7,000 terrorists are?
A guy goes on a Virginia Tech campus
with a handgun and kill 32 people. One
person.
We have seen active shooters and all of
this. You you got the guy in Vegas that
killed 50 people. You got the post
nightclub. The guy killed I don't know
50 60 people in there. Post nightclub.
One shooter. One club. Imagine 7,000
terrorists.
America.
I hope that the guy that never happens.
Our our our equipment and stuff is a
little better. We don't have rashana and
all that other stuff. So we kind of on
alert and everybody got a gun in Israel.
Everybody don't have a gun. just because
they serving in the IDF, they're no
longer in the IDF and they may not be
carrying a gun. And this is at the
Kabuz, too. So, these people don't even
have a gun on them. They have guns
stored in these places and they're kind
of like the liberals. They love the
Palestinian people. That's why they came
and killed them. They invited them to
their house. They advocated for the
Palestinian people. And look who they
killed first. Okay. But anyway, it was
it was a over they they got overwhelmed.
And the IDF guy said it was like 12
hours before they can get it under
control.
You put that stuff in perspective, the
damage that one active shooter can do in
America, imagine 7,000. It we would have
a tr we would have trouble combating
that that level of force. So anyway,
let's go to the next two. 105. This is
just Charlie Kirk also saying negative
things about Israel on camera. Roll the
clip.
>> But the fact is now BB and the Israeli
hardight government has a mandate.
>> [sighs]
>> I got to be careful the way I say this
to they're going to try to ethnically
cleanse Gaza.
>> Yep.
>> I mean that that's and I'm I don't use
that term lightly. Okay. They're talking
about basically removing 2.5 million
people from there. Okay.
>> And honestly, they have a mandate to go
seek justice and revenge. They do. There
is they this idea that they need to have
a truce or a peace treaty. That's
morally crap after you see women and
children be burned alive and dragged to
the streets. But there are some serious
questions here, Patrick. And let me tell
you, my pattern recognition
over the last 5 years has become pretty
sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know,
Epstein. When I see a story and it
doesn't click,
we're our guts are usually right.
>> All right. So, openly on Patrick B.
David, he said that.
And you telling me now, now here's the
thing I want people to to understand and
then I'm going to uh bring in one more
clip. Charlie Kirk is very clear that he
began to question the Israeli
government. I know it. You should know
it. Everybody around him knows it. That
does not mean that he turned on Israel
and his Zionist perspective of Israel's
right to exist. His frustration was with
the government, not the existence of
Israel. People say he changed. he
changed. No, he became more critical of
the government. He wrote a whole letter
to Benjamin Netany and Yahoo of his
criticism constructively. So, there's no
question that Charlie Kirk became more
critical of the Israeli government.
Charlie Kirk was on a podcast. I mean,
he was on the stage not the other day
saying um that he disagreed with the
government of Israel. He disagreed with
the fact that they are pushing LGBTQ and
all this other crazy stuff. He disagreed
with that. But he's he would never
change his his belief that Israel has a
right to exist as a Zionist. He said it
on camera. I'm gonna find the clip.
Let's get the last clip in. 106.
Roll it. And Jewish donors, they have a
lot of explaining to do, a lot of
decoupling to do because Jewish donors
have been the number one funding
mechanism of radical open border
neoliberal quasi Marxist policies,
cultural institutions, and nonprofits.
This is a beast created by secular Jews.
And now it's coming for Jews. And
they're like, "What on earth happened?"
And it's not just the colleges, it's the
nonprofits, it's the movies, it's
Hollywood, it's all of it. It's like
time for you guys to wake up and say no
more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't
care if you hate me.
Now look, I agree with him a thousand%.
Anybody with a with a brain stem can
criticize secular Jews and understand
that every Jew ain't the same. You
should criticize secular Jews. Secular
Jews just as ignorant as black folks.
Black people still vote for these
Democrats ain't done nothing. Secular
Jews out there voting for Mum Donnie.
Am I gonna get cancelled now because I'm
No, you don't get cancelceled for for
being rational. You get cancelceled for
lying and pushing conspiracy theories.
But Charlie Kirk said it openly, didn't
he? On this show, front of the world.
And you telling me on stage he's telling
Tucker, "Go Max." Like he can't say
anything. He said it. Charlie Kirk was
openly critical of Israel. the
government. Come on, bro.
[music]
>> [music]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.