Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk Confront Backlash From Pro-Israel Allies Over Nuanced Criticisms

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Confronts Marxism, Evil, and the Church's Role in Modern America at Miami Synagogue

Charlie Kirk Confronts Marxism, Evil, and the Church's Role in Modern America at Miami Synagogue

1:34:28

Charlie Kirk and Josh Hammer Reflect on High-Profile Israel Debate at Turning Point USA Summit

Charlie Kirk and Josh Hammer Reflect on High-Profile Israel Debate at Turning Point USA Summit

17:08

Dave Smith Reveals Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu: Wrestling With Israel Support

Dave Smith Reveals Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu: Wrestling With Israel Support

21:35

Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk Confront Backlash From Pro-Israel Allies Over Nuanced Criticisms

Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk address a troubling pattern emerging from some pro-Israel advocates who label them anti-Semitic for raising legitimate questions about Israel's war strategy, propaganda effectiveness, and the Jeffrey Epstein controversy. Despite their bulletproof records defending Israel and fighting campus anti-Semitism, both hosts have received hostile texts and public attacks from friends and allies for mild criticisms. Kelly argues that Israel has lost the propaganda war, with support dropping from 47% to 25% among independents and from 36% to 8% among Democrats. Kirk, who honors Shabbat and is writing a book on the subject, expresses frustration at having his moral character questioned for hosting balanced debates at Turning Point events. Both warn that aggressive responses to honest commentary risk alienating their strongest advocates.

Categories: Interviews
August 6, 2025

Defending Israel While Questioning Strategy

Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk opened a candid conversation about a growing tension in the pro-Israel community. Both have established extensive records defending Israel's right to self-defense and speaking out against anti-Semitism on college campuses since the conflict began. Kelly noted she's been "at the pointy end of this spear," while Kirk emphasized his commitment remains "heartfelt." However, both expressed concern that some pro-Israel advocates have become so reflexively defensive that they undermine their own cause by attacking anyone who raises even mild criticisms.

Kelly explained her frustration: "Some in the pro-Israel camp are so kneejerk about calling you anti-Semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause. I find it very irritating because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't want to be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches."

The Propaganda War and Shifting American Opinion

Kelly presented data showing Israel has experienced a dramatic shift in American public opinion. She contends that while Hamas propaganda drives much of this change, the numbers tell a stark story. Republican support for Israel's military action in Gaza dropped from 76% in June 2024 to 71% currently. Among Democrats, support collapsed from 36% in October 2023 to just 8% now. Independents shifted from 47% support to 25%. Among Americans under 35, support has nearly vanished.

"Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in letting this thing go on so long," Kelly said during an appearance on Piers Morgan's show. "They have lost support amongst their dearest friends. And even the entire Democrat party here in the United States has turned against them and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally."

She emphasized that while Israel's response to the October 7 attacks was justified and didn't need to be proportionate, the extended nature of the conflict has cost Israel its moral high ground with much of the world.

The Jeffrey Epstein Controversy

Both hosts faced backlash for discussing the possibility that Jeffrey Epstein had connections to intelligence agencies, including Mossad. Kelly noted that speculating about whether Epstein was "a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated" resulted in accusations of anti-Semitism. She found this reaction particularly absurd given that critics often claim people can criticize Israel without being labeled anti-Semitic, yet immediately deploy that label when uncomfortable topics arise.

Kirk pointed out that former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has stated Epstein was an agent, making it a legitimate topic for investigation. "We have to be pursuers of truth," Kirk said. "They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging."

Charlie Kirk's Experience at Turning Point Events

Kirk described being targeted on social media after hosting a debate at a Turning Point event where he gave equal time to pro-Israel advocate Josh Hammer and critic Dave Smith. Despite moderating the discussion rather than taking sides, Kirk's moral character was questioned. The controversy trended on Twitter with thousands of tweets attacking him, along with numerous hostile text messages.

"I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it," Kirk explained. "And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you doing this? I'm sorry. I'm an American citizen. Yes, I want Israel to win. Yes, I'm a Christian. But the way I've been treated by some, not all, by some, has been so unfair."

The Double Standard

Both hosts noted an unusual double standard where they face more backlash for criticizing Israeli government actions than actual Israeli citizens do. Kirk observed: "I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government without backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really weird."

Kelly's appearance on Piers Morgan illustrated this dynamic perfectly. When she expressed skepticism about images of starving children coming out of Gaza, noting that Hamas manipulates such propaganda, her comments were widely circulated and praised by pro-Israel advocates. However, when she followed up by saying Israel has lost the propaganda war and should consider wrapping up the conflict as Trump suggested, she received approximately 25 hostile text messages from friends questioning her loyalty.

A Warning From Steadfast Allies

Both hosts emphasized they remain supporters of Israel and want to see the nation succeed against Islamic extremism. Kirk described his spiritual connection to Israel: "My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly."

However, they delivered a pointed warning about the counterproductive nature of aggressive responses to honest commentary. Kirk explained: "The more you attack our moral character, the more we're going to double down in that direction because screw you. I don't do it that way. Tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I've got my facts wrong. But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group with a bunch of our students, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, 'Charlie is no longer with us.'"

Kelly added: "I've been bullied by the best of them and it didn't work and it's not going to work with them. The more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it. You don't own me. I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro-Israel than I am."

Understanding the Paranoia

Kirk attempted to extend charity to his critics by acknowledging the psychological state of people whose nation is at war. "If I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyper paranoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white and you're a hammer looking for a nail," he said. "What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in 1930s Germany online? How would I behave?"

Despite this understanding, Kirk concluded: "At the same time, it's not defensible to be dumb."

America First

Both hosts emphasized their primary identity as Americans. Kirk stated clearly: "You and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first. Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. And Israel, we have funded, we have supported, and they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism. And we should be cheering for them because they're up against barbarians and monsters and we want them to win."

This framing underscored their position that while they support Israel as an ally fighting against extremism, their ultimate loyalty lies with America. They reject the notion that supporting Israel requires accepting every aspect of Israeli strategy without question or that American commentators should refrain from honest analysis of the conflict's progression.

The Risk of Alienating Advocates

The conversation concluded with both hosts warning that hostile reactions to mild criticism risk weakening rather than strengthening Israel's position in American discourse. Kirk noted that he and Kelly, along with Tucker Carlson, represent personality types that respond to bullying by becoming more outspoken rather than less.

"You're going to weaken and basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues," Kirk warned. Kelly acknowledged receiving texts from mutual friends saying they were saddened to see her "leave" the pro-Israel camp, to which she responded there was nothing to debate because she remains on Israel's side.

Both emphasized that nuanced criticism from committed allies should be welcomed rather than attacked, and that the reflexive labeling of skeptics as anti-Semitic ultimately damages Israel's cause by driving away supporters who refuse to be bullied into silence.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!