Retired Police Officer Kevin Donaldson Faces 20 People Accusing Cops of Racial Profiling and Excessive Force

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Brandon Tatum Reveals How Football Dreams Died and Police Career Sparked Conservative Rise

Brandon Tatum Reveals How Football Dreams Died and Police Career Sparked Conservative Rise

2:36:45

Brandon Tatum and Candace Owens Discuss Black Culture, Faith, Family and the Battle for America's Soul

Brandon Tatum and Candace Owens Discuss Black Culture, Faith, Family and the Battle for America's Soul

44:02

Tucker Carlson and Vince Everett Ellison Expose the George Floyd Narrative and Democratic Party's Vision for Black America

Tucker Carlson and Vince Everett Ellison Expose the George Floyd Narrative and Democratic Party's Vision for Black America

8:34

Retired Police Officer Kevin Donaldson Faces 20 People Accusing Cops of Racial Profiling and Excessive Force

Retired New Jersey police officer Kevin Donaldson sits across from 20 individuals who challenge his claims about police accountability, use of force, and racial profiling. The debate grows heated as participants share personal stories of harassment, brutality, and trauma at the hands of law enforcement. From the Sonya Massey shooting to allegations of systemic racism in South Central LA, Donaldson defends police training and accountability while acknowledging problematic officers exist. The conversation explores mental health responses, sexual assault victim treatment, qualified immunity, and whether most cops truly are honorable and selfless. Both sides grapple with deep pain, mistrust, and the question of whether healing between communities and police is even possible.

October 6, 2024

The Debate Begins: Lethal Force and Accountability

Kevin Donaldson, a retired police officer from New Jersey, opened the debate by claiming that cops only use lethal force as a last resort. The statement immediately drew pushback from participants who cited numerous cases where officers appeared to use deadly force prematurely. One participant referenced the Sonya Massey case, where a woman holding boiling water was shot after saying "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus." Donaldson acknowledged that particular officer was "100% wrong" and that the woman was too far away to pose an imminent threat.

The conversation turned to Derek Chauvin and George Floyd, with one participant claiming that before Chauvin murdered Floyd, police officers weren't being held accountable. Donaldson strongly disagreed, calling this "a statement straight out of the news media's mouth" and insisting officers had accountability before that case. However, another participant countered that Chauvin was "the first cop that I can think of in my lifetime that actually went to prison for the crime he committed."

Discussion about the use of force continued as participants brought up cases of officers shooting people in the back. A participant from East Los Angeles described a young boxer he trained who was shot four times in the back after taking a swing at an officer and running away. Donaldson stated unequivocally that shooting someone in the back is illegal unless that person is actively shooting back at officers, and that such officers would face jail time.

Training Deficiencies and the Need for Better Preparation

Multiple participants raised concerns about inadequate police training, particularly regarding de-escalation and physical skills. Donaldson agreed with these criticisms, stating he has been saying for years that every cop should be "at least a purple belt in Jiu-Jitsu." He explained this would accomplish two goals: giving officers the physical ability to handle confrontations and building the confidence that comes from knowing you can handle yourself physically.

The conversation about training expanded to include mental health response. A participant who had been a 5150 hold as a 16-year-old described being treated like a criminal for being suicidal, handcuffed to a hospital bed, and placed in rooms with much older patients. The participant mentioned Christian Hull, who was shot seven times by state troopers in 2020 after holding his hands up for 14 seconds during a mental health crisis.

Donaldson acknowledged that until about 15 years ago, police officers lacked proper training on what he called EDPs (emotionally disturbed persons). He agreed that training remains insufficient and called this "unacceptable." He emphasized that more money needs to be invested in resources to train officers on handling people experiencing mental health episodes, as this has become a "growingly identifiable issue."

Qualified Immunity and Officer Accountability Systems

The discussion turned to qualified immunity and the protections officers receive. One participant questioned how officers could get away with shootings because of these legal protections. Donaldson responded that to the best of his knowledge, qualified immunity was taken away "quite some time ago for good cause," emphasizing that "nobody including police officers is above the law."

He cited the example of Steve Carr and Lou Eppolito, who were mob hitmen for the NYPD for years before the law eventually caught up with them. However, he acknowledged it "just took too long." Donaldson argued that police are held to a higher standard than everyone else, pointing out that if he as an officer took a swing at someone, he would lose his job, whereas a civilian might only spend a night in jail.

Participants challenged whether internal investigations provide real accountability. One asked how many times investigations are conducted by outside agencies versus the department itself. Donaldson said that in New Jersey, every shooting is investigated by an outside agency, and he believes this is the standard in most places. He also mentioned that his friend was under indictment for murder for 15 weeks even though the shooting was captured on video and proven to be completely justified.

The Problem of Bad Cops and Department Transfers

The Sonya Massey case came up again regarding officer Shawn Grayson's history of working at six different departments. A participant from the city demanded to know how an officer with such a problematic record could keep getting hired. Donaldson called this "red flag number one," stating that constantly hopping departments clearly indicates a problem.

Donaldson repeatedly emphasized throughout the debate that "nobody hates a bad cop worse than a good cop" because bad officers make everyone else look terrible. He acknowledged there are "certain people that should never be cops" - people who were "shoved in lockers in schools" and have a complex about authority. He stated that the cops who should be officers know exactly who these problematic individuals are because they have a "God complex."

When asked about officers who get fired from one department and simply move to another, Donaldson acknowledged this happens and shouldn't. One participant pointed out that even after misconduct is revealed, officers can sometimes find work in a different county despite having a history of discriminating against Black and brown people.

Racial Profiling and Treatment of Communities of Color

The most heated exchanges came when discussing racial profiling. A participant from South Central Los Angeles stated directly: "I think you guys get trained to do that and on top of that you humiliate our people, the brown and the blacks. That's your job." Donaldson asked what training would teach officers to racially profile, to which the participant responded it "goes without saying" and described being stopped constantly just for walking down the street, especially humiliating when it happened in front of his kids.

Donaldson asked if the participant had ever done anything wrong that officers didn't catch him for. When the participant acknowledged this had happened occasionally, Donaldson asked why police can't claim the reverse - that they didn't catch him when they should have. The participant described cops coming into neighborhoods, causing damage, and leaving without any care for the community.

Discussion turned to why Black and brown people are disproportionately incarcerated. Donaldson attributed much of this to economics, explaining that people with expensive lawyers are more likely to avoid conviction, while those from lower socioeconomic classes cannot afford high-priced attorneys. He called the legal system flawed because it's run by humans, and "the one universal truth about human beings is they're flawed."

Gang Units and Aggressive Policing Tactics

A participant from Los Angeles specifically called out gang unit divisions, saying the majority of those officers are bad and "put a bad name on cops period." The participant described seeing cops "allow it" when their colleagues act improperly. Another participant accused police of acting like gang members themselves, even using slang to talk to community members.

When asked if police academies teach officers the difference between ex-gang members and active gang members, the conversation became tense. The participant argued that reformed gang members still get pulled over and harassed. Donaldson responded that if someone gets pulled over while doing nothing wrong, they should "thank the police" because officers are looking out for the community, trying to reach those who haven't changed their ways yet.

This response was met with strong disagreement. The participant said officers rarely have a reason when asked why they made a stop, and attributed it to his appearance and skin color. Donaldson countered by describing his own experience being pulled over in Alpine, New Jersey, a wealthy neighborhood, while driving his friend's Infinity, and being ripped out of the car. He maintained that "if you're not doing anything wrong and you get stopped then nothing's going to happen to you."

Sexual Harassment Within Police Departments

A female participant from North San Diego shared a story about a friend going through the sheriff's academy who experienced significant sexual harassment from instructors and peers. She challenged Donaldson's claim that most officers are selfless and honorable, asking how to tell the difference between good officers and those who harass colleagues.

Donaldson acknowledged that female officers are "so essential to police departments" because male officers cannot search female suspects. He praised female officers as "Dynamite at what they do" and "way tougher than I am." However, he suggested that in the highly male-dominated field, female officers sometimes feel pressure to be "one of the boys" and engage in inappropriate workplace conversation, which then gets reciprocated, leading to someone getting angry and filing harassment claims.

The participant pushed back, noting her friend's harassment came from instructors with years of experience, not fellow recruits. Donaldson acknowledged that instructor harassment is "never okay." When the participant said her friend felt she couldn't speak up due to fear of retaliation, Donaldson offered to teach her "how to use her voice very loudly" and said the friend should call him. He explained that while internal policies exist for reporting harassment, the problem exists across many professions, not just policing.

Media Coverage and the 0.0001% Narrative

Donaldson repeatedly argued that the public only sees the worst of policing because media doesn't cover the 99.99% of positive interactions. He stated that a cop saving a two-year-old with CPR or helping an elderly woman with groceries isn't newsworthy on a national level, but a cop doing something wrong gets covered by every station in the world.

One participant strongly challenged this, asking why we see "so many incidences over and over and over on the news daily across the country" if it's really just a few bad apples. Donaldson responded that with approximately 700,000 police officers in the country, even 70 bad incidents represents a tiny percentage. The participant countered that 70 is still a lot and that police have a different role than office workers - they have weapons and power and are supposed to protect and serve.

The participant shared that from his personal experience, "the majority were on a power trip and treated people shitty over time." He accused Donaldson of asking cops to be perfect. Donaldson responded he wasn't asking for perfection, just reasonableness, and maintained the real percentage is closer to 0.0001%. The participant insisted that before Derek Chauvin, cops weren't being held accountable, a claim Donaldson called "straight out of the news media's mouth."

The Psychological Toll and Lack of Mental Health Support

Donaldson opened up about the psychological impact of police work, revealing he had "that gun in my mouth" and understood suicidal ideation personally. He explained that the average person experiences between two and six critical incidents (worst days of their life) in their entire life, while police officers see upwards of 800 such incidents during a 20-year career - "your worst day times 400."

He acknowledged that this takes an enormous toll and identified a huge problem within police departments: the stigma around mental health. Donaldson explained that when he was on the force, if an officer went to his boss and said he was having wicked nightmares, they would take his gun and put him on desk duty rather than simply letting him talk to someone. He called these "institutional problems on the police force."

Multiple participants noted that cops become hardened over time, similar to how criminals do. One participant, who had done time, explained that criminals get hardened from dealing with cops frequently, and cops have the same experience - they cruise around, target people, and over time stop liking dealing with the public. Then they pass their attitude on to new recruits, creating "a pile of you guys" with the same mentality.

Sexual Assault Victim Treatment and Changing Protocols

One of the most emotional moments came when a participant shared her experience of being kidnapped and raped for 12 hours at age 19. She described being found by police but feeling interrogated rather than helped. Still covered in her attacker's urine, she was taken to an interrogation room where officers asked questions like "was it his left hand or his right hand?" without any trained professional offering empathy.

She explained the experience was so traumatizing that after being admitted to the hospital and released, she attempted suicide and told her mother she wished she hadn't survived. She was then required to return weekly to provide more details and have her injuries photographed, each visit feeling like "an out-of-body experience."

Donaldson acknowledged that officers asking questions like "what were you wearing" - while intended as factual information gathering - could be perceived by victims as victim-blaming. He explained that police departments are now implementing new training specifically on sexual assault that approaches cases from a victim's or survivor's perspective (noting he doesn't like the word "victim"). The goal is to help officers approach survivors with more sensitivity, which makes survivors feel more comfortable and understood, leading to better information and stronger investigations.

The Power Dynamic and Civilian Rights

A particularly passionate participant accused police of being "predators" who are "seeking and destroying" rather than serving and protecting. He argued that officers "rip apart the very fabrics of the community" and act entitled because of their badge. He pointed to cops using lights to avoid traffic, intimidating people, and clicking their gun open when people invoke their rights.

The participant emphasized: "We don't need you. We have our own rights. We have our own rights to carry. We pay our own taxes." He pointed out that citizens pay for the very things police use against them, including officers' salaries. He accused police of acting like they can get away with anything and justifying it because their word is believed over civilians' word.

Donaldson responded by asking what the participant does with his life and why he hasn't chosen to change the system from within. The participant explained that cops made him who he is - he felt like a criminal because of how they treated him based on his appearance. However, he also shared that one police officer changed his trajectory when he was young and stealing everything he could. That officer asked "what are you doing with your life?" and that single statement made him want to change direction.

The Judge Police Harshly Claim

When Donaldson claimed police shouldn't be judged so harshly, participants pushed back hard. One pointed out that cops have the highest divorce rate of any profession, questioning how "honorable and selfless people" could have that distinction. Another stated their tax dollars pay officers' salaries and also cover lawsuits when officers commit misconduct, so harsh judgment is warranted.

This participant made a clear distinction: "If it was somehow provided by private funding I feel like they shouldn't be judged as harsh, but my money is going towards the police department. That's why I judge so harshly." Donaldson acknowledged this was fair and said he tried to hold himself to a high standard knowing he represented the community. He described the weight of seeing 800 critical incidents over a career and called it "a cry for help to fix this, fix us internally so we can avoid these lawsuits."

One participant insisted cops are not honorable at all - "they're just a bunch of cowboys and we're just the cattle." When Donaldson challenged this person to join the force to change it, the participant explained he used to want to be a cop as a kid, but his experiences changed that. Donaldson emphasized the importance of teaching the next generation to go into policing to fix the broken parts, stating "if you see the system as being broken and you stand by and you're silent, you're complicit."

The Force Continuum and Fighting Fair

When participants accused police of harassment and creating terrifying situations even when there's no immediate threat, Donaldson stated plainly: "We don't fight fair. Police aren't paid to fight fair." He explained that policing "isn't take off your badge and put your gun down. This is a job. Our job is to protect the streets."

He elaborated that when officers see something, they're pulling people over because "we're looking for something. You might not be that person but we're looking for something." He insisted there's no reason to be terrified of police and that the fear people feel is taught to them by whoever raised them, because "police are there to protect you, they're not there to terrorize you."

This perspective was met with disbelief by several participants. One pointed out they've watched cops driving down the street and seen parents pick up their kids in fear. Donaldson attributed this to parents teaching children to fear police. When pressed on why officers call for backup so frequently - "25 people to pull over one guy on a bike" - Donaldson reiterated that police have radios to call other people "so we don't have to fight."

The Question of Racism and Bigotry

One of the most confrontational exchanges occurred when a participant stated directly: "I hate cops." Donaldson asked if the participant was racist, clarifying that he was asking because "the definition of racism is treating a group of people differently by the way they look or what they do." He noted it's actually bigotry, then explained that hating all cops because of bad interactions with some cops is irresponsible.

The participant explained that police killed his cousin - he was having sex with a girl in a park when officers assumed he had a gun and shot him. When Donaldson suggested maybe the cousin was "well endowed," the participant wasn't amused. The participant insisted: "Most of us getting killed every day." Donaldson challenged this mathematically, pointing out that if the Black population is about 17% of 320 million Americans (roughly 50-60 million people), then "most" would mean over 25-30 million people getting shot by cops, which clearly isn't happening.

Another participant challenged Donaldson's claim about judging by appearances, pointing out that Donaldson judged her the moment she walked in. Donaldson agreed completely: "Everyone judges appearances. The moment I saw you walk in I knew you were the cop." He mentioned his white skin, American flag tattoo, and arriving early as giveaways. He acknowledged everyone judges everyone, but emphasized that he treats people with respect and expects respect back, though "if you're going to be a dick to me, boy I can sure be a dick."

Finding Common Ground and Moving Forward

Despite the heated exchanges, moments of genuine connection emerged. The participant from South Central LA who had been most hostile to police acknowledged: "You guys made me stronger. You guys made me who I am today, but I would have liked to have gone in a different way." He mentioned spending nine months in jail for marijuana possession for something he didn't do, saying "it's time to change all this."

Donaldson responded: "The beautiful thing is brother, you and I still got some air in our lungs right? We're not dead yet. You and I have a chance to sit down at the table and work together and that is where things start to get fixed." He emphasized: "As long as I have air in my breath I'm never going to give up. I will never give up on you. I don't care what you did. Everybody has a chance to change their life."

The participant acknowledged there needs to be "a lot of reparation towards the people" and that pain still exists in communities that hasn't healed. Donaldson pointed out that the participant had already gone from "victim to victor" by not letting cops live in his head rent-free. He praised the participant's work with the next generation, noting that while he's "on the back nine" of life, what both of them can accomplish with young people is "amazing."

Reflections After the Debate

In post-debate interviews, participants reflected on the experience. One noted that the majority of comments came from watching videos and being "spoonfed information without having to develop their own personal opinions from firsthand experience." However, those with firsthand experience "really impacted me more." Several participants acknowledged that Donaldson was "clearly a reasonable guy" and that's why he was good at arguing - he was "a little more compassionate, a little more open-minded" than cops they'd typically encountered.

One participant said that if Donaldson had been the responding officer during any of their crisis situations, they would have "felt a lot safer." Another appreciated learning that "real good cops hate bad cops," saying "that was like something that hadn't caught my attention before." However, this same participant concluded: "Because Kevin is a cop I can't see him more than that. We can't be friends. We can't go any much further than that in that aspect and it's sad to say but that's just how I feel."

Donaldson reflected that he appreciated "everybody bringing up the deficiencies within the police because believe it or not police officers see the deficiency in the police department and there's steps being taken actively to erase those things." He concluded: "I'm always going to be one-sided towards the police cuz I've done that job, but I think listening to the other side is really how you get a well-rounded perspective on something. By approaching things with an open mind - say hey listen I'm here, teach me something, I'm not going to be resistant to it - I think you can get a lot of stuff accomplished and I think that's how discussion should be had."

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!