Piers Morgan Confronts Twenty Woke Liberals on Toxic Masculinity, Fascism, and Gender Pronouns

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Stephen A. Smith Sits Down With Candace Owens: Black Conservatives, Harvey Weinstein, and Why Democrats Lost

Stephen A. Smith Sits Down With Candace Owens: Black Conservatives, Harvey Weinstein, and Why Democrats Lost

1:01:59

When Comedians Destroy Hecklers: Rob Schneider, Leonarda Jonie and Troy Bond's Most Savage Confrontations

When Comedians Destroy Hecklers: Rob Schneider, Leonarda Jonie and Troy Bond's Most Savage Confrontations

12:22

Dave Rubin Faces the Far Left on Wokeism, Broken Cities, and Trump's Legacy in Heated Jubilee Debate

Dave Rubin Faces the Far Left on Wokeism, Broken Cities, and Trump's Legacy in Heated Jubilee Debate

1:41:05

Piers Morgan Confronts Twenty Woke Liberals on Toxic Masculinity, Fascism, and Gender Pronouns

Piers Morgan, author of Woke Is Dead, sits down with twenty self-identified woke liberals to challenge their perspectives on toxic masculinity, cancel culture, and gender ideology. From debating whether masculinity has ever been toxic to questioning the logic behind seventy-four official gender pronouns, Morgan defends traditional liberalism while arguing that modern wokeism has abandoned its roots. He confronts participants on issues ranging from stoicism and mental health to the efficacy of pandemic mandates and the erosion of women's sports. Each conversation reveals deep divides on what it means to be liberal, how language shapes culture, and whether contemporary progressive movements have crossed into authoritarianism.

November 30, 2025

Masculinity Under Fire

Piers Morgan opens the conversation by addressing what he calls a "completely new phenomenon"—the phrase "toxic masculinity." He notes that before thirty years ago, the term didn't exist, and only in the last decade has it been weaponized against men. Morgan references Chris Williamson's list of behaviors blamed on toxic masculinity: gang violence, climate change, Brexit, Donald Trump's election, not wearing face masks, eating meat, physical fitness, fast food, capitalism, communism, hip hop, body spray, stoicism, risk-taking, religion, atheism, playing board games, being interested in cars, and even saying hello.

Morgan argues that masculinity itself has never been toxic. Instead, some men behave badly—just as some women do—but no one calls that "toxic femininity." When challenged on whether different societies define masculinity differently, Morgan insists the core of masculinity remains unchanged. What has shifted is the interpretation, driven by what he describes as "weak, whiny, woke wastrels" who want to make men hate themselves.

One participant, a self-identified leftist, raises the issue of intergenerational trauma among men, citing World War II and Vietnam veterans who returned with PTSD. Morgan counters that stoicism and competitiveness are virtues, not vices. He points to the American Psychological Association's guidelines suggesting traits like stoicism, competitiveness, and risk-taking should be discarded. Morgan calls these traits "the very best of being a real man."

Andrew Tate and Misogyny

The conversation turns to Andrew Tate, a polarizing figure in discussions about modern masculinity. Morgan acknowledges that Tate says things young men gravitate toward because few others empower them. Tate encourages fitness, hard work, and self-improvement—messages that resonate with disenfranchised young men lacking father figures. However, Morgan also condemns Tate's "blatant misogyny," noting his beliefs that women should stay home, never vote, and never work.

Morgan distinguishes between toxic masculinity and misogyny, arguing that misogyny already has a name and doesn't need to be conflated with masculinity itself. One participant suggests men like Tate hide toxic behavior behind masculine rhetoric, but Morgan insists that's not toxic masculinity—it's just bad people being bad.

Stoicism, Therapy, and Participation Trophies

Parker, who previously appeared on Morgan's show, challenges Morgan on stoicism, suggesting an "overexpression" of keeping emotions bottled up can be harmful. Morgan disagrees, explaining that stoicism doesn't mean being emotionless like Spock. It means reaching inside yourself when dealt a tough blow and handling it with strength.

Morgan quotes a scene from Rocky Balboa where Rocky tells his son, "Life will beat you down and keep you down if you let it. It's not about how hard you can hit, it's about how hard you can get hit, get back up, and keep moving forward." That, Morgan says, is stoicism.

When Parker advocates for therapy, Morgan responds that he's never been to therapy and sees no need. He suggests people talk to friends instead of strangers. Parker insists therapy helps him process emotions constructively, but Morgan counters that society has become "over-therapied," with people constantly analyzing and self-obsessing.

Morgan also criticizes participation trophies, arguing they condition young people to think losing deserves a prize. This, he says, is the worst preparation for the real world, where outcomes matter and not everyone wins.

Social Media and Mental Health

Morgan references Jonathan Haidt's work on smartphones and young brains, noting that since 2010—when smartphones became "smart"—there's been a direct correlation with increased anxiety, depression, and suicide among young people. He blames constant negative dopamine from social media for scrambling young brains and making them believe the world is ending.

Yet Morgan cites Steven Pinker's research showing this is statistically the best time to be alive. There are fewer wars, people live longer and healthier, child poverty is down, and water is cleaner than ever. The problem, Morgan argues, is social media amplifying bad news and making young people catastrophize.

Morgan wants young people given proper mental tools in education to deal with the real world without over-medicalizing or over-therapizing. He believes society has reached a point where losing is deemed better than winning, and people are celebrated for failure rather than success.

Wokeism as Fascism

Morgan's second major claim is that woke ideology has become "anti-liberal and fascistic." He explains that wokeism began in the 1960s in black American music as a positive movement raising awareness for social and racial injustice. By that original definition, Morgan says he's happy to call himself woke. But something changed in recent years.

Morgan argues that wokeism was supposed to celebrate liberalism—being open-minded, respecting differing opinions, and valuing individual rights. Instead, the woke left has said, "We hate fascists and Nazis, and everyone we disagree with is a fascist or Nazi." Morgan warns this demonization is dangerous, citing the assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk by someone who inscribed anti-fascism slogans on bullets.

Evan, one participant, pushes back, arguing that wokeism is being used to distract from class politics. He points to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under Elon Musk, which he says destroyed institutions like the National Labor Relations Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau while distracting people with culture war issues like trans athletes and DEI policies.

Morgan responds that he supported cutting government waste but didn't agree with everything DOGE cut. He then pivots to trans athletes in women's sports, noting Donald Trump's promise to ban biological males from competing against women resonated with voters. He mentions that Kamala Harris endorsed allowing trans athletes in women's sports, and Trump understood most Americans—and most people worldwide—disagree with that.

Trans Athletes and Women's Sports

Morgan references Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, who was banned from the World Championships after testing positive for male chromosomes. Evan disputes this, citing the International Olympic Committee's position that Khelif was born female with a female passport. Morgan insists all Khelif needs to do is take a sex test to settle the matter.

Evan argues that trans issues ranked last (22nd out of 22) in a Gallup post-election poll, meaning voters didn't care about it. Morgan counters by citing a New York Times deep dive into a Trump campaign ad featuring Kamala Harris endorsing trans athletes. The ad ended with "Kamala is for they/them, Donald Trump is for you." According to the Times, that ad moved the needle by as much as three points.

Morgan also discusses Betty Yee, a candidate for governor of California, who endorsed gender-neutral Olympics for Los Angeles. Morgan calls this "complete and utter insanity," especially for track and field. When asked which sport might work gender-neutral, Evan suggests archery. Morgan argues that a gender-neutral Olympics would result in women winning perhaps two bronze medals total, effectively destroying women's sports.

Fascism and Authoritarianism

Mason attempts to distinguish fascism from authoritarianism, arguing fascism specifically seeks to preserve hierarchy based on shared ethnicity or culture. Morgan disagrees, insisting wokeism has become fascistic because it controls speech, shames dissenters, and in extreme cases, incites violence.

Nick joins the conversation, arguing fascism uses state power to impose opinions. Morgan counters that the woke left deployed state power during the pandemic, mandating masks and vaccines despite changing science. Nick insists people lost jobs for refusing masks or vaccines in public-facing roles, while Morgan argues thousands lost jobs based on mandates later proven flawed.

Morgan admits he was initially sensorious about pandemic measures but now believes the government was wrong about mask efficacy and vaccine transmission. Nick argues erring on the side of caution during a deadly pandemic was justified. Morgan counters that when the state issues mandates based on flawed science, it crosses into authoritarianism.

Gender-Neutral Pronouns Are Pointless

Morgan's third claim is that gender-neutral pronouns are pointless. Jeremiah, a therapist, argues pronouns help people feel validated and affirmed. Morgan responds that if someone's life depends on pronouns for validation, their life is lacking other things.

When Jeremiah explains non-binary individuals use they/them pronouns, Morgan laughs, calling it absurd. "They/them is plural. How can you be more than one person?" Jeremiah says non-binary people embody both masculine and feminine traits, but Morgan dismisses it as nonsense. He references a recent guest who couldn't explain what non-binary means.

Morgan asks how many pronouns exist. Jeremiah doesn't know. Morgan reveals there are seventy-four official ones, including "astral gender," defined as "an affinity with space." Jeremiah can't explain "ze" pronouns either. Morgan also quizzes him on the full LGBTQIA2S acronym, which Jeremiah struggles to recite completely.

Jenny enters the conversation, distinguishing biological sex from gender as a social construct. Morgan asks how many genders exist. Jenny says she doesn't know or care—it's a scale. Morgan presses: where's the limit on self-identification? Jenny deflects, saying pronouns are just English language tools, no different than names.

Morgan argues it's gotten out of hand when there are seventy-four genders and even LGBT experts can't remember all the letters in the acronym. He recounts a debate on International Women's Day where he declared himself a black lesbian to test the limits of self-identification. The black woman on his show was not amused.

Conclusion

Morgan closes by reiterating his position as a "pissed-off liberal" who believes the woke left has abandoned true liberalism. He wants the woke left to return to common sense so they can be electable again. His frustration stems from what he sees as joylessness, intolerance, and authoritarianism masquerading as progressivism. Whether discussing masculinity, fascism, or pronouns, Morgan insists the woke movement has lost its way—and he's determined to call it out.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!