Candace Owens and Mark Lamont Hill Clash Over Diddy Scandal, Black Celebrity Silence, and Kamala Harris Identity Politics

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens on Victimhood Culture, Big Tech Power, and the Future of Black America

Candace Owens on Victimhood Culture, Big Tech Power, and the Future of Black America

39:44

Candace Owens Discusses Outrage Culture, Trump, Black America, and Her Political Awakening on Joe Rogan

Candace Owens Discusses Outrage Culture, Trump, Black America, and Her Political Awakening on Joe Rogan

2:31:05

Trump's Legacy Over: Why His Jeffrey Epstein Response and Israel Policy Betrayed the MAGA Movement

Trump's Legacy Over: Why His Jeffrey Epstein Response and Israel Policy Betrayed the MAGA Movement

21:54

Candace Owens and Mark Lamont Hill Clash Over Diddy Scandal, Black Celebrity Silence, and Kamala Harris Identity Politics

Candace Owens joins Piers Morgan alongside Mark Lamont Hill and Lord Jamar for a heated debate about the expanding Diddy scandal and the conspicuous silence from major celebrities. The conversation explodes into arguments about race, identity politics, and whether Barack Obama and Kamala Harris are exploiting blackness for political gain. Owens calls out LeBron James and John Legend for their deafening silence on Diddy's alleged crimes while championing other social justice causes. The debate intensifies as Lord Jamar goes viral for refusing to support Harris, accusing her of disrespecting black voters with word salads and manufactured accents, while Hill defends her qualifications and authenticity.

October 17, 2024

The Diddy Scandal Deepens

The scandal surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs continues to expand with new allegations emerging almost daily. Federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering have been filed, and a slew of new civil lawsuits accuse him of sexual assault against six victims, including a 16-year-old boy. What makes this case particularly disturbing is that it appears to have been an open secret in Hollywood for years.

Candace Owens explains that she's not surprised by any of the revelations. She points out that there was substantial evidence including picture and video documentation long before Diddy's arrest. The mainstream media, she argues, spent years defending this man, allowing him access to presidential candidates and portraying him as a hero while people behind the scenes knew what was happening.

Owens draws parallels to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that Diddy may have been collecting blackmail on various Hollywood figures. She believes this is just the beginning of the scandal, with more big names likely to face consequences. The silence from certain individuals, particularly LeBron James, is deafening according to Owens. She notes that James, who claims to care deeply about black lives and has been vocal about social justice issues, has said nothing about his friend Diddy being caught on camera beating a black woman.

Celebrity Silence and Double Standards

Mark Lamont Hill joins the debate, stating unequivocally that everything Diddy has been accused of is despicable and indefensible. He agrees that many people in Hollywood's old boys network, which includes powerful black men like Diddy, have likely known about this behavior for a long time. However, Hill pushes back against what he sees as unfair targeting of specific celebrities like LeBron James.

The conversation becomes heated when Hill reveals that John Legend actually did make a statement about the Diddy allegations months ago. Legend said he was horrified by the descriptions he read before video evidence came out, that his default stance is to believe women when they make accusations, and that what Diddy is accused of is shameful. This revelation forces an acknowledgment that assumptions were made without checking the facts.

Piers Morgan draws comparisons to the Harvey Weinstein scandal, noting that there was an absolute stampede of celebrities rushing to publicly denounce Weinstein when his crimes came to light. With Diddy, however, there's been a marked difference in the number of high-profile black celebrities willing to speak out. This raises questions about whether fear of what might be on Diddy's alleged hidden camera tapes is keeping people silent.

The Race Element

Mark Lamont Hill introduces what he sees as a race piece to the story, arguing that black people are being asked to denounce Diddy by virtue of being black in a way that white people weren't specifically called upon as white people to denounce Weinstein. He suggests there's an assumption that black celebrities should represent blackness in the black community.

Owens and Morgan push back hard on this characterization. Morgan points out that actually, the reverse is true when you look at the Harvey Weinstein scandal, every major celebrity who had worked with him was asked to comment and most rushed to do so. The difference with Diddy is that far fewer high-profile celebrities have been willing to make public statements.

Owens clarifies her position, explaining that she called out LeBron James specifically not because he's black, but because he has consistently used his platform to speak out about black victimization and social injustice. The hypocrisy, she argues, is in being vocal about every other issue affecting the black community while remaining silent when the perpetrator happens to be a friend. She also mentions Ashton Kutcher, who is white, as another celebrity whose silence is notable given his previous comments about Diddy parties.

Understanding the Silence

Hill offers an alternative explanation for why some celebrities might be staying quiet. He suggests that a lot of the subtext around Diddy isn't just about predation, but also about sexuality. Some people in Hollywood may be quiet not because they knew about illegal activities, but because they were at parties doing things that, while not illegal, could ruin their careers in a society that can be homophobic.

Owens agrees to some extent, adding that what many people didn't know was that Diddy was allegedly recording them. According to the lawsuit filed by Rodney Jones, there were hidden cameras throughout Diddy's properties. Celebrities who made comments like "ain't no party like a Diddy party" suddenly learned through the press that Diddy may have been collecting evidence on all of them. This uncertainty about what might be on tape could be buying silence as people hope to keep their heads low and avoid being exposed.

Cat Williams is mentioned as someone who talked about these parties years ago, describing walking around Diddy's house and seeing people engaged in various sex acts in different rooms. At the time, Williams was dismissed as crazy and a drug addict, but his allegations now appear to have been truthful.

Kanye West and New Allegations

The conversation shifts to Kanye West, whom Owens recently visited in Japan. An 88-page lawsuit was filed against Kanye alleging that he drugged and raped an assistant at one of Diddy's parties. The lawsuit comes from Lauren Pisciotta, an influencer and former OnlyFans star who has sued Kanye before.

Owens explains that she hasn't read the lawsuit because she just returned from Tokyo, but she asks whether there are videos and documentation like there were with Diddy, or if these are just allegations. She positions herself as someone who stood up against aspects of the #MeToo movement, specifically the idea that women should be automatically believed without evidence and that men should have their careers destroyed based solely on accusations.

The Diddy situation was different, Owens argues, because there was an unprecedented amount of evidence filed in the lawsuit, including pictures, photos, and documentation. She says she would be a complete hypocrite not to speak out if there was ever anything filed against Kanye as strong as what was filed against Diddy, especially given that Kanye was one of the first to use his platform to speak out against Diddy before it became popular.

As for Kanye's current state, Owens reports that he looked great, had lost weight, and seemed happy and healthy. He told her he needed to get out of Los Angeles, which Owens completely sympathizes with because she believes Hollywood is a demonic town that has been established by gangs since its founding.

Obama's Controversial Comments

The debate takes a turn toward electoral politics when discussion shifts to Barack Obama's recent comments essentially telling black men they have a duty to vote for Kamala Harris. In the clip, Obama suggests that some black men are coming up with excuses not to support Harris and that part of him thinks they just aren't feeling the idea of having a woman as president.

Lord Jamar, host of BET News and Upfront, responds forcefully to Obama's comments. He makes it clear that nobody should vote for anybody based on identity politics and that you should never vote for somebody just because they're black. Obama is wrong, according to Jamar, for trying to shame black men into voting a certain way.

Mark Lamont Hill agrees that Obama is wrong but clarifies what he believes Obama was actually arguing. Hill says Obama wasn't arguing that people should vote for Harris because she's black, but rather that as black people, they should vote for the person who best represents their interests, and that person is Harris according to Obama. Hill's issue with Obama's statement is that it frames black people and black men in particular as pathological and as people who act against their interests.

The Kamala Harris Question

Lord Jamar's viral comments about Kamala Harris become a focal point of the discussion. He expresses frustration with what he sees as Harris's disrespectful approach to black voters, accusing her of giving word salads and nonsense, acting like she doesn't have to answer questions, and being an artful dodger. When pressed on whether she deserves to be called derogatory names, Jamar explains that the platform where he made those comments was a different kind of platform, more hip-hop oriented and looser in its language.

Candace Owens goes further, arguing that there is nothing about Kamala Harris or Barack Obama that is genuinely black in terms of their lived experience. She goes through Obama's history in detail: he spent the first eight years of his life in Indonesia with his white mother and Indonesian stepfather, then went to Hawaii which had a population of just 5,000 black people, attended a school that cost $31,000 per year and was all white, was raised by his white grandparents, had a white roommate in college, and dated a white woman.

According to Owens, there is nothing about Barack Obama's history that gives him the standing to speak to "the brothers" about the black American experience. She sees a pattern of politicians being "blackified" right before they run for office, suddenly changing their story and leaning into stereotypes. To Owens, it feels like both Obama and Harris are wearing blackface.

Owens says she can't sort through all of Kamala Harris's various accents. In front of a Latina crowd, suddenly she's Selena speaking like a Latina. In front of a Jamaican crowd, she's dropping her voice and changing her affect. In front of a white crowd, she's speaking like a California valley girl. This slipping through so many personalities is something Owens doesn't trust.

Mark Lamont Hill's Defense

Hill strongly disagrees with the characterization of Harris as unqualified or inauthentic. He points out that she has many responsibilities beyond just the border, including serving as President Pro Tempore of the Senate and domestic policy adviser. While there are legitimate reasons to criticize Harris, particularly her support for what Hill calls a "vicious genocide in Gaza," framing her as unqualified is simply not accurate.

On the question of Harris's blackness and her code-switching, Hill offers a passionate defense. He explains that what Owens and others are calling "personalities" are actually codes, and black people code-switch from place to place all the time. He jokes about how he talks differently to his accountant versus his agent versus people at the local soul food spot versus the Five Percenters in New York.

Hill argues that when Harris says someone is her aunt, she's not lying even if they don't share blood because black people use fictive kinship and call people "auntie." Going to Howard University is a black experience. Pledging Alpha Kappa Alpha is a black experience. These are fundamental parts of black American culture that Harris participated in.

In a pointed comment directed at Lord Jamar, Hill notes the irony of someone who believes in Five Percenter theology, which holds that the black man is the Asiatic black man who came from North America by himself, questioning whether someone who went to Howard is black enough. It's a sharp critique of what Hill sees as inconsistent standards for determining blackness.

The Misinformation Question

Hill argues that part of the reason Trump's popularity is growing with black voters while Harris's support falls is due to what he calls a steady disinformation and misinformation campaign. He believes people are being fed information that is simply not true, including some of what was said during this very debate.

Morgan plays a clip of Harris talking to Roland Martin, listing all the reasons Trump is dangerous for black people: he was sued for not renting to black families as a landlord, he took out a full-page ad calling for the execution of the Central Park Five who were innocent black and Latino teenagers, he promoted birther lies about the first black president, and he claimed legal Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were eating pets.

Morgan's question is simple: if Trump is so dangerous to black people, why is his popularity growing with them, particularly black men, while Harris's support is falling from where Joe Biden's was? Hill attributes this to misinformation, while the other panelists clearly believe it reflects genuine dissatisfaction with Democratic policies and identity politics.

Code-Switching and Authenticity

The debate concludes with Owens mockingly demonstrating code-switching by putting on a British accent and suggesting that if it's so normal and acceptable, she should be able to run for president and put on a different accent every time she speaks to someone else. It's a sarcastic point about the difference between natural code-switching and what she sees as calculated performance.

The fundamental disagreement comes down to authenticity and representation. One side sees Harris as a qualified candidate with genuine connections to black American culture who naturally code-switches like many black Americans do. The other side sees a wealthy woman with an Indian mother who grew up with an Indian experience, was sworn into Congress as an Indian American, and only began emphasizing her blackness when running for president.

Both sides agree that identity politics shouldn't be the determining factor in how people vote. Both sides agree that Diddy's alleged crimes are despicable and that more celebrities should speak out. But they fundamentally disagree on whether the racial dynamics at play in celebrity silence, political endorsements, and voter outreach are examples of legitimate community advocacy or cynical manipulation.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!