Up Next
Brandon Tatum Defends Charlie Kirk Against Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories and Netanyahu Bribery Claims
27:27
Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination After Erika Kirk's Powerful Forgiveness Speech and Kash Patel Statement
1:00:21
Douglas MacGregor Explains Why He Believes Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated Over Foreign Policy Views
19:40
Tucker Carlson Reveals Charlie Kirk's True Feelings About Benjamin Netanyahu Before His Death
Tucker Carlson shares personal conversations with Charlie Kirk about the Turning Point USA founder's evolving views on Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and US foreign policy. Kirk faced intense donor pressure after inviting Tucker to speak, losing a $2 million donation just days before his death. According to Carlson, Kirk was deeply troubled by Netanyahu's influence over American foreign policy and the neoconservative push for regime change wars. Despite attacks labeling him an anti-semite, Kirk maintained his Christian faith-driven convictions about avoiding another forever war. Carlson also criticizes Netanyahu's immediate response to Kirk's death as an attempt to hijack grief for political purposes, revealing that Kirk had privately expressed strong reservations about the Israeli Prime Minister to multiple people.
Tucker Carlson's Personal Account of Charlie Kirk's Final Months
Tucker Carlson has provided candid insights into Charlie Kirk's evolving views on Israel and US foreign policy during the final months before Kirk's death. According to Carlson, Kirk had grown increasingly vocal in his criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu and the neoconservative push for regime change wars in the Middle East.
Carlson explains that Kirk's views were primarily informed by his Christian faith and his extensive conversations with young people across America. Kirk believed that the war on terror had been a net loss for the United States, causing incalculable economic, physical, and spiritual damage to the country. He was determined not to see America drawn into another forever war, particularly with Iran.
The Backstage Conversation That Changed Everything
Before Carlson's speech at a Turning Point USA event in July, the two had a significant backstage conversation. Carlson was preparing to discuss the neoconservative effort to draw America into war with Iran and the Jeffrey Epstein case, including Epstein's connections to intelligence agencies. Concerned about causing problems for Kirk with his donors, Carlson initially hesitated to address these controversial topics.
Kirk's response was unequivocal. Looking directly at Carlson, he said, "Go all the way. Do it. Go all the way." Despite knowing the backlash it would cause among his donor base, Kirk encouraged Carlson to speak freely about these sensitive subjects.
This aligns with Kirk's documented actions during the escalation of tensions with Iran, when he personally went to President Trump to plead against bombing Iran or pursuing regime change operations.
The Donor Backlash and Financial Consequences
Following Carlson's speech, Kirk faced severe consequences from his donor base. A small but intense group of donors tormented Kirk until the day he died, according to Carlson. The American Jewish Committee issued a statement calling Charlie Kirk an "anti-semite" and "dangerous," labels that deeply wounded Kirk despite his long history of supporting Israel and having many Jewish friends.
The financial impact was substantial. Carlson revealed that two days before Kirk's death, he lost a $2 million donation because he had publicly pledged to bring Carlson back to the next Turning Point conference in December. Kirk regularly texted Carlson over the following months, saying "Man, I'm really taking a lot of heat for this and people are really mad."
Despite this pressure, Kirk maintained his commitment to free speech and his principles. Every time Kirk expressed concern about the backlash, Carlson offered to step away from the speaking engagement. Kirk refused, insisting it was a matter of principle and that Carlson should be there.
Kirk's True Feelings About Benjamin Netanyahu
Carlson was emphatic that Kirk did not hate Jews or Israel. Kirk loved going to Israel, had many Jewish friends, and supported the state of Israel. However, Kirk strongly disliked Benjamin Netanyahu personally and expressed this sentiment to Carlson and others many times.
According to Carlson, Kirk felt that Netanyahu was a very destructive force. He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza and, above all, resented that Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country. Kirk viewed this as shameful, embarrassing, and bad for the United States.
Carlson emphasized that enough text messages exist to verify these claims and that Kirk's feelings about Netanyahu are documented facts, not speculation.
Netanyahu's Response to Kirk's Death
Carlson expressed disgust at Netanyahu's immediate response to Kirk's death, describing it as "ghoulish and really repulsive." He accused Netanyahu of trying to take the energy, sadness, and grief people felt over Kirk's murder and redirect it toward support for his own political projects.
Netanyahu immediately blamed "Islamists" for Kirk's death, implying an Islamist killed Kirk, and attempted to portray Kirk as a steadfast Netanyahu supporter. Carlson noted that Netanyahu held up the last note Kirk had sent him and read a small passage from it, a gesture that others, including Candace Owens, have questioned as potentially misrepresenting Kirk's actual views.
Carlson stated he had never seen anything lower than Netanyahu's attempt to hijack Kirk's memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly because what Netanyahu said was "completely untrue."
The Broader Pattern of Suppressing Dissent
Carlson highlighted a disturbing trend in American political discourse: people with power don't want to hear disagreement or be challenged. He noted that even prominent figures who built their reputations on defending free speech, such as Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee, were demanding that Kirk remove Carlson from the speaker roster because of statements Netanyahu or his supporters didn't like.
Carlson found this particularly ironic given that Dillon had famously faced his own cancellation and free speech challenges. He also noted that he had supported Dillon during those difficulties, hosting him on his show and having dinner with him.
The pressure campaign against Kirk represented a fundamental violation of free speech principles. As Carlson put it, he felt his views were "pretty moderate" — he had never been an Israel hater or anti-semite, he simply didn't want more wars and didn't want a foreign country humiliating America and dictating what American laws should be. This struck him as "pretty basic America first stuff," and Kirk agreed.
Corroboration from Other Sources
Carlson's account aligns with reporting from Max Blumenthal's Greyzone, which cited an unnamed source close to Kirk describing similar pressure and Kirk's growing concerns about Netanyahu's influence. The source told Blumenthal that Kirk believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel's overwhelming influence in Washington.
This corroboration from multiple independent sources lends credibility to the narrative that Kirk was indeed experiencing significant pressure over his evolving foreign policy views and his willingness to platform speakers critical of Israeli government policies.
Kirk's Complex Position as a Bridge Figure
Kirk occupied a unique position within the conservative movement as a bridge between a predominantly Zionist donor class and a younger activist base with very different views on Israel. Polling shows that older conservatives overwhelmingly support Israel, with approval ratings around 75-80%, while only about 25% of young conservatives are strongly pro-Israel.
This demographic divide created tension that Kirk had to navigate carefully to maintain his organization. He had to balance the expectations of wealthy donors who demanded unwavering support for Israel with the views of young activists who were increasingly skeptical of American foreign policy in the Middle East.
What Remains Unknown
Carlson was careful to note that much remains unknown about who murdered Charlie Kirk and why. He explicitly stated he was not accusing anyone of involvement in the murder or trying to imply anything without evidence. However, he felt it was important to establish the truth about Kirk's actual views and the pressure he faced, especially given the efforts by Netanyahu and others to distort that truth.
The case continues to raise questions, including the strange circumstances around George Zinn, who was initially arrested after proclaiming himself the shooter and telling authorities he was trying to allow the actual culprit to get away. While Tyler Robinson has been charged with the shooting, various oddities in the case remain unexplained.
The Importance of Truth and Kirk's Legacy
Carlson concluded by emphasizing that he wanted to share this information because many liars, with Benjamin Netanyahu number one among them, were trying to distort the truth about who Charlie Kirk was and what he believed. Carlson stated he knows these facts and can prove them.
Kirk's legacy, according to Carlson, should be that of someone who loved people and was a purveyor of peace, not someone who was dangerous or anti-semitic. Kirk was someone who put principle above financial pressure, who encouraged free speech even when it cost him personally, and who was willing to evolve his thinking based on his Christian faith and his conversations with young Americans about what was best for their country.
Video Transcript
He did not like BB Netanyahu and he said
that to me many times and he said it to
people around him many times and so he
would text me and say, "Man, I'm really
taking a lot of heat for this and people
are really mad." The American Jewish
Committee called in a statement Charlie
Kirk an anti-semite and quote dangerous
Charlie Kirk. Two days before he died,
he lost a $2 million donation because he
had publicly pledged to bring me to the
next Turning Point conference in
December.
Tucker Carlson just explained the truth
about Charlie Kirk, Israel, and
Netanyahu. And was Charlie Kirk's
attitudes shifting toward Israel and US
foreign policy toward Israel? What's the
truth about him feeling frightened or
threatened by donors toward the end of
his life? Tucker Carlson gives his
personal insights as he talked to
Charlie Kirk during when all this was
happening. So, let's get his take on
this. Please like the video and
subscribe to the channel. and what is
the state of a couple of big debates
that are happening within the Republican
coalition particularly around foreign
policy and Charlie's views on foreign
policy which I think are fairly wellnown
now a lot of people lying about them um
were evolving uh but had really evolved
um and who knows why he reached the
conclusions he did I I think his
Christian faith informed them mostly was
also the experience of talking to young
people and his views were very much like
theirs believed that the war on terror
had been a net loss for the United
States and it caused incalculable
damage, not just economic and physical
damage, but spiritual damage to the
United States. It was it was bad. We got
nothing out of it. We were only hurt.
And he didn't want to see that again.
And he felt very strongly about that.
And of course, I agreed. Uh, and so
before that speech that I gave in July,
we had a conversation about this
backstage right before I went on and I
was fulminating and getting all red in
the face like I often do to my shame and
I was mad thinking about this and
thinking about uh the effort by the
neocons in the United States to draw us
in to another forever war with Iran.
It's not a defense of Iran, of course.
It's merely an acknowledgement that
we've done this before. Uh this happened
in Iraq which uh you know we we entered
into uh at the behest of those same
foreign policy strategists. Um and and
it didn't work. And so I was going on at
some length backstage with Charlie and I
said uh you know probably not going to
talk about that. I'm not going to
torture you. I know your donors hate
this when I say that. Um, and also
Epstein was in the news and it was clear
to me that, you know, Epstein's probably
not like a MSAD agent or something, but
Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli
intelligence and American intelligence
and French intelligence, but the only
one you're not allowed to talk about is
Israeli intelligence. But it's it seemed
true to me and I had done uh some work
on that and I knew a bunch of people
pretty close to that story. So So I
thought that and I said that to Charlie
and I said, "But I'm not going to say
that because I don't want to make your
donors mad. I know. It's just going to
be like an endless
flurry of texts telling you to stop or
you're going to lose a bunch of funding.
And he looked at me, I'll never forget
it, and said, "Go all the way. Do it. Go
all the way." I said, "Man, I you know,
a lot of things I can talk about. I
don't need to talk about that." And he
said, "Do it." Wow. Well, that makes me
respect Charlie Kirk a lot more than I
did before, knowing that this would
disturb many of his donors. It looks
like that was the direction this was
heading. Even after Tucker got invited
to that Turning Points USA debate, Dave
Smith did too. He's not the most, you
know, upstanding guy. If you ask a
neocon, the neocons will say he's a
deviant enemy of humanity and a
self-hating Jew and all that, right? We
hear it all. But what Tucker said about
Charlie is correct based on the record
we have back when the war versus Iran
was going on. It was heating up. It's
still technically going on. We're in a
ceasefire. You know, I don't think we've
heard the end of it, but I'll digress.
Um, he did go to Trump and personally
plead Trump not to bomb Iran and not to
enact a regime change war. The same kind
of regime change war that Ben Shapiro
and Mark Levvin were trying to push him
into. The same kind of regime change war
that Netanyahu's wanted for my entire
lifetime essentially. And how he's
talked about how Iran is inches away
from a nuke for something like 30 years.
He's not going to stop on that, by the
way. And Charlie Kirk did plead with
Trump not to do it. And around that
time, you saw several texts. I think
that that was in mid June where he
warned against this sort of operation,
how it's always full hearty and bitten
America in the ass in the past. And you
shouldn't trust these vile neocon
stooges. He didn't use those language,
but those people that had dominated the
foreign policy establishment to steer us
in that direction in Iran. So that is
true.
>> So I did it. By the way, I think that
that conversation he had a mic on and so
did I. Probably exists somewhere on
somebody's server, but that's I think a
faithful rendition of what he said. Um,
and by the way, I'm not trying to blame
him for my remarks. You can agree or
disagree with those remarks, but I I'm
saying this only because I was uh
shocked and sickened by the reaction of
the ghoulish and really repulsive
reaction of the prime minister of
Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's
death.
basically made it all about him and all
about his country immediately trying to
take the energy, the sadness, the grief
that people felt over Charlie's murder
and redirected towards support for
whatever project he's involved in. He
absolutely did that. You can watch the
clip. He did that and he blamed
Islamists right away for Charlie's
murder, implying that it was an Islamist
that killed Charlie. You can see this
clip. It is wild. this clip with Greta
Van Sustran where Greta Van Sustran
asked him about that and how he holds up
the last note that Charlie Kirk had sent
to him and read you know a small passage
from it and Candace Owens wants
Netanyahu to divulge the entire contents
of that note because she believes he's
misinterpreting it but that's my
interpretation too and hey I can't stand
Netanyahu I'm a little bit biased here
but it's a little bit different when you
know an ardent anti-sionist says this
and someone like Tucker says this, you
know, Tucker's been pretty critical of
Israel when it comes to, you know, the
right, but he hasn't called it a
genocide as far as I'm I know in Gaza.
And, you know, he makes it a point
almost all the time to say that he still
loves Israel. He's taken his children
there. You know, it's not to confuse the
people of Israel with the nation of
Israel and the government of Israel, but
that is the truth. And
>> by the way, Benjamin Netanyahu is not
the same as the nation of Israel at all.
>> That See, there he goes. You knew it was
coming, right?
>> Uh BB is despised by many people uh in
Israel and if you know people who live
there, you know that that's true.
>> That's true. But it's not enough. He has
something like 75% public support in
most polls. There are dissident like Yay
Golan and Ehuda Almer, but they're few
and far between unfortunately. Um there
are huge divisions within the Israeli
government. I mean there are certain
parts of the the intel world uh in
Israel that do not support some things
that Benjamin Netanyahu has done
recently. So, it's not the same as
attacking Israel, attacking BB. But I I
don't think I've ever seen anything
lower than his attempt to hijack
Charlie's memory and use it for his own
political ends, particularly because
what he said was completely untrue.
Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews.
He had tons of friends who were Jews. He
loved the state of Israel. He loved
going there. He did not like BB
Netanyahu. And he said that to me many
times, and he said it to people around
him many times.
>> Yeah, that's interesting. That does
comport with the Greyzone article that
Max Blumenthal published, you know,
talking about an unnamed source that was
close to Kirk and what happened toward
the end of Kirk's life. I'll just show
that right here. You know, Kirk had
grown to believe Netanyahu was not, you
know, the kind of figure that most
neocons thought. Um,
even this unnamed source said even Trump
himself was fearful of it, of his
impact, of his manipulative abilities,
etc. So, that does coincide and align
with this source that gave Max
Blumenthal information for his article.
So, you can believe Tucker or not about
what Charlie said about Netanyahu, but
it does, you know, match what Max
Blumenthal's source was. He felt that BB
Netanyahu was a very destructive force.
He was appalled by what was happening in
Gaza.
He was above all resentful that he
believed Netanyahu was using the United
States to prosecute his wars for the
benefit of his country and that it was
shameful and embarrassing and bad for
the United States and he resented it.
Didn't hate Netanyahu. He wasn't out
there with a placard saying that.
>> Yeah. Again, this does conform to this
article. The source told the grison that
the late proTrump influencer believed
Netanyahu was trying to cow him into
silence as he began to publicly question
Israel's overwhelming influence in
Washington and demanded more space to
criticize it. So, if you're going to
just tell Max Blumenthal his whole
article is nuts and bogus and a
conspiracy theory, you know, this source
does coincide with what Tucker is
saying. It coincides with what Candace
Owens is saying. another very good
friend of Kirk and it does coincide with
a what a lot of people are saying
regardless of what you think about the
circumstances in his death he did seem
to have more and more aversions toward
Netanyahu toward the end of his life
certainly so but he certainly expressed
that to me and a lot of other people and
there's no question that BB's defenders
uh on the internet will call me a liar
or a kook uh but that's a fact and
enough text messages exist that I think
it can probably be verified in pretty
short order. Not that it needs to be
because that is true.
>> Candace Sons has been calling for that
outwardly loudly to for everyone to
divulge their text messages about this
subject with Charlie so the world can
see because a lot of the neocons and
Zionists are, you know, pushing back
against this, saying it's bogus, it's a
conspiracy, it's the product of
anti-semitic, you know, fervor and
things like that, right? This this
absurd notion. And here you have it
confirmed by at least three people very
close to Charlie Kirk.
>> Um, shortly after that speech, there was
a very intense attack on Charlie and to
some extent on me, not that I really
noticed, but on him. I have no donors.
He had hund00 million worth of donors.
And so, because he was involved in a
different project from just yapping on
the internet, which is what I do for a
living, um, he was dependent to a great
extent on his donors. Of course, it's a
nonprofit. And they went after him and
tormented him. Not all, of course. Many
were supportive, but uh the ones who
were offended by my speech, and there
was a a small, very intense group who
were, tormented Charlie Kirk until the
day he died. Two days before he died, he
lost a $2 million donation because he
had publicly pledged to bring me to the
next Turning Point conference in
December.
Interesting. There's never been figures
given on this, as far as I'm aware and
following the story until what Tucker
said right now, that he lost a $2
million donation. That's not chump
change. He had a lot of donors. This was
a very prosperous organization.
But again, Max's Greyzone article points
to this too. The unnamed source in
addition to Tucker close to him. You
know, supposedly he was not only
alienated by the hostile nature of the
interactions with his donors, but
frightened by the backlash. So again,
this coincides with what the other
source says. It corroborates that to a
large degree. And he told me over the
past couple of months that he was losing
a lot of donations over that pledge.
They put out a flyer basically saying
that I was going to be at this event
giving a speech. And so he would text me
and say, "Man, I'm really taking a lot
of heat for this and people are really
mad. The American Jewish Committee
called in a statement, Charlie Kirk an
anti-semite and quote dangerous. Charlie
Kirk an anti-semite." Yeah. I mean, I
think a lot of the Zionist organizations
are the lowest of low, but I can't even
fathom calling Charlie Kirk the consmate
defender of Israel and doubler down on
pro-Israel propaganda as it pertained to
Gaza as an anti-semite for, you know,
supposedly turning against them. It it
that's so absurd and it's just beyond
imagination. But then I look at what
happens all the time that any reasonable
criticism toward Israel is turned in
that direction. No matter who you are,
you know, even if you're Charlie Kirk,
even if you're Jewish, by the way, Norm
Finkelstein's been called anti-Semitic,
Dave Smith, Jeff Saxs, Max Blumenthal,
Aaron Mate, the list goes on and on. A
lot of these people, if you dare to
criticize the Israeli regime, not Jews,
the Israeli regime, if you criticize it,
no matter who you are, you can be the
son of Holocaust survivors like Norm
Finkelstein and they'll still call you
anti-Semitic.
Um, he was not an anti-semite. He was
the opposite. And he was not dangerous.
He was a great lover of people and a
purveyor of peace. He was the opposite.
And he was very stung by that. Those of
us who've been called names for a long
time are a little bit harder to offend.
Charlie was deeply offended by that and
expressed some of those feelings on
Megan Kelly show and in other places.
But that did not let up. The reason I'm
telling the story is because he called
me and then came to see me at my house
about this topic and uh I said to him
every single time, look, it's, you know,
I've got my own way to communicate my
views. This is actually not the most
important issue to me. There lots of
things I can talk about. I don't need to
come to turning point. I can take a year
off. No problem. I hated seeing how much
he was suffering the hassle he was
getting from people. Uh and I was being
attacked too by the way. It was a huge
effort. Uh I wasn't fully aware of it
actually because I don't go online that
much. But there was a huge effort by
people some of whom I know and have
helped and like Seth Dylan of the
Babylon B for example. Someone who had
his own problems with free speech who
was famously cancelled. Um and I I like
Seth Dylan. I had him on a couple of
times. I had dinner with him to show
support. Seth Dylan was out there
demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off
the roster, pull me off stage because I
had said things that BB didn't like or
that he didn't like or whatever. Well,
of course, Seth Dylan is one of the most
ardent Zionists there are in the in the
world. I mean, I think he's the either
the founder or he heads the Babylon B.
Super pro-Zionist. He's very outward and
outspoken about it on Twitter. But the I
think the unique thing about the
pressures Charlie was feeling was and it
makes him in a way a lot different than
say Tucker Carlson and Candace although
they certainly have felt the pressures
and antagonism against them for going
against Israel in certain ways. But
Charlie was a link. He was kind of a
gateway between a rich donor class that
was predominantly Zionist and a young
activist based. And what do we know
about the dynamics on the right between
the young and the old on the issue like
this? It's that older people are much
more likely to support Israel. That's
just the truth. And I know there's
exceptions that are going to be watching
this. Older people that hate the Israel
first mentality view it rightfully, I
think, as a plague. But older
conservatives largely support Israel.
And that Zionist donor class represents
that to a tea. But the younger activist
base is much less likely to support
Israel. I've seen various polls that
say, you know, like 25% of young
conservatives are very pro-Israel and
among older conservatives, it's
something like 75 or 80%. Like that
really shows the different demographic
shift. And he had to kind of play both
hats. He had to play both roles and
length that class. He had to, you know,
weigh the differences on those issues to
create a successful organization and
keep it going despite these dynamics
which were butdding heads. They are
butting heads in the conservative
movement right now.
Shocking that someone whose whole
persona is wrapped up in the idea that
we all get to speak and if you don't
like it, make a more compelling case.
that that person and many others like
him were advocating for me getting
pulled off the stage because they don't
like what I'm saying.
>> How ironic, too. Charlie Kirk, the prove
me wrong guy, sitting under a sign
asking people to debate him, lauding the
prospect of free speech, you know, have
a sincere problem when it comes to the
free speech he's exercising in the
guests he invites to his program. that
doesn't really sit well with the Zionist
class.
>> This is a trend and one that we should
be really concerned about. It's not just
about Israel, by the way, at all. The
trend is really simple. People with
power don't want to hear disagreement.
They don't want to be challenged ever.
That's why we have free speech to
acknowledge that even those of us or
people with less power still have a
right to talk because they're human
beings. You don't own them. So time
after time, Charlie would call me or
come to see me and let me know, wow, or
show me text messages. These people are
really mad that you're speaking. And I
would always have the same thought,
like, I feel pretty moderate, actually.
I've never been an Israel hater.
Obviously, I'm not an anti-semite. I
just don't want more wars and I don't
want a foreign country humiliating my
country and telling us what our laws
have to be. I mean, this seems like
pretty basic America first stuff. And he
would say, I totally agree with you.
>> Well, it is and it should be basic
America first stuff. Unfortunately, the
right is generally captured by the
Israel lobby. The liberal
establishment's no different. They
preach the whole America first doctrine,
but don't exercise it. They campaign
like they're Ron Paul and govern like
their John McCain. It's a quote my
friend Clint Russell said, but that's
true, very much so. And that's why you
see so much chagrin among dissident that
supported Trump. You can't really, you
know, stomach this or handle this if you
actually thought he was going to be a
non-interventionist. And then he goes
and starts a war with Iran, bombs Yemen
for a month, continues to aid Ukraine,
makes excuses for the genocide in Gaza
over and over and over, but they want
you off the stage. And I would always
say, "No problem." And he would say,
"No, it's important.
It's a matter of principle. I want you
to be there." Great.
By the way, I'm not accusing anyone of
being involved in that murder. I'm not
trying to mutter darkly or imply
anything. We don't there's a lot we
don't know about who murdered Charlie
and why, but I I don't know and I'm not
going to pretend that I do. But I think
it's important to say that out loud
because it's a fact and there are many
liars out there trying BB Netanyahu
number one among them shamefully
who are trying to distort the truth. a
truth that I know and can prove.
>> He certainly is trying to do that.
Netanyahu went into propagandistic
overdrive even for him the moment that
Charlie Kirk died. You know, just
lauding him as the most pro-Zionist
American ever, you know, trying to
recapture the American right. Ben
Shapiro is doing the same thing, by the
way, right now. Surprise, surprise. Who
saw that? Who didn't see that one
coming? Right. But one thing I I noticed
in what he just said there at the end
was when he talked about the fact that
there's still a lot we don't know about
the shooting and the shooting the
shooter of Charlie Kirk. And that's
interesting to me because this was
recorded live tonight as I'm recording
this. And this is after the FBI divulged
all the information that they wanted to
release to the public on this after
charging Tyler Robinson in this
shooting. And if you ask me, there are
some weird oddities. I think the George
Zinn thing, the decoy that was arrested
right of the way is the weirdest thing
because he proclaimed that he was the
shooter. There doesn't seem to be any
evidence people have presented that link
him to Tyler, but he told authorities he
was trying to allow the culprit to get
away. Like that's weird. I mean, he he
might be mentally deranged. We looked
into his history in a previous video. He
had a char he had charges for
trespassing. Authorities knew him well.
He was considered a gadfly that went to
lots of political events. But one thing
he got charged in was threatening to put
bombs at the end of the Salt Lake
Marathon, Salt Lake City Marathon, just
days after that had happened in Boston.
Remember the Boston Marathon bombing? He
had threatened that in Salt Lake City a
few days afterwards. So he had a record
a little bit of injecting himself into
these big big stories that were deadly
and destructive. This one was no
different. But it still raises
questions. But I'm glad that Tucker gave
his testimony about what the truth is
because lots of people are saying, "No,
Charlie didn't really turn against
Israel. Charlie had some skepticism, but
he definitely didn't turn against
Israel." And a lot of people are saying,
"Yeah, he really turned against Israel.
He was really feeling a lot of pressure
at the end of his life." Much of what
Tucker said here corroborates what we
saw from the Gray Zone, that unnamed
source that talked to Max Blumenthal.
Maybe Tucker knows that unnamed source
as far as I'm concerned. I really want
to know what his family thinks about
this and get them as much information as
possible. Arm them with these texts and
things like that such that they can make
the decision to pursue this privately if
the FBI isn't going to be truthful,
which they never are. Let's be honest
when it comes to Israel. You know, I
mean, if we're just asking whether they
will be honest about that subject, I
think we're gonna be in for a rude
awakening. Just look at how they handled
the the Epstein case. No one ever talked
about Epstein's associations with Ehood
Barack and Ari Ben Minaj and Adnan
Kosigible and Robert Maxwell. They won't
touch that stuff with the 10-ft pole.
But thanks, Tucker, for sharing your
story about Charlie, the pressures he
was feeling. I have no reason to think
that's not legitimate. All this isn't
legitimate. But at the same time, I will
say some of those interviews, including
the one with Shapiro, like 5 days before
he died, it's teeing off softballs for
Shapiro to knock out of the park with
Hosboro propaganda, with pro-Zionist
propaganda. And on Megan Kelly's show,
there were some eyebrow raising moments.
Charlie was very vocal about this
phenomenon, the pressures he was feeling
about, you know, his loyalty to Israel
being questioned at the end of his life.
But then it was also filled with a lot
of pro-Israel propaganda. We can't trust
the pictures coming out of Gaza. This
isn't a genocide. Stuff like that. So
taken in totality, I think it's a mixed
bag. And people on both sides of this
have been wrong to some extent in many
cases. I'm trying to bring the truth.
I'm trying to sift through it and just
present that to you. And I like what
Tucker said tonight. It's useful and it
fits into this puzzle that people are
trying to piece together regarding the
final days of Charlie Kirk's life. But I
do want to hear from you. Let me know
down below. Is what Tucker Carlson said
significant about Netanyahu, Charlie's
evolving opinions toward Israel, the
pressures he was feeling from his
donors, and does that play into any of
the dynamics related to his death? Let
me know in the comments down below.
Please like the video, subscribe to the
channel. Also, subscribe to Tucker.
Thanks Tucker for this special and
please consider becoming a YouTube
member. If you click the join button
below, you can help support this channel
and in return for that, I'll give you
access to all my videos before they go
live to the general public on YouTube.
Those are the membersonly videos. Till I
see you guys next time, no more war, no
more debt, no more inflation, and no
more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you
in the next one.