Up Next
The Charlie Kirk Synchronized Hit: The Clues Mainstream Media Won’t Explain
1:10:15
Erika Kirk & TPUSA Have Lost Their Minds
18:05
Trial Lawyer Explains Why Tyler Robinson Will Walk: The Prosecution's Case Falls Apart Under Scrutiny
23:44
Why So Many People Are Questioning Erika Kirk's Sincerity and Message
🎙ï¸AmFest should be a proving ground not a personality circus. TPUSA has built real infrastructure but it risks drowning it in spectacle if discipline gives way to clout and faction fights. Candace Owens brings heat and questions that expand the audience even when leadership flinches. Alex Jones brings raw energy that mobilizes but needs guardrails to convert noise into votes. Erika Kirk now runs a serious operation and that means transparency tone and trust matter more than theatrics. Steve
🎙️AmFest should be a proving ground not a personality circus. TPUSA has built real infrastructure but it risks drowning it in spectacle if discipline gives way to clout and faction fights. Candace Owens brings heat and questions that expand the audience even when leadership flinches. Alex Jones brings raw energy that mobilizes but needs guardrails to convert noise into votes. Erika Kirk now runs a serious operation and that means transparency tone and trust matter more than theatrics. Steve Bannon understands machines win wars not applause lines. Tucker Carlson understands narratives move people when institutions fail. Put it together or watch it fracture. You do not win midterms on vibes or viral moments. You win by recruiting registering training and delivering turnout beyond the faithful. Treat AmFest like a war room not a pageant. Expand the coalition. Focus the message. Build local power. Action beats spectacle every time.
🌐 Visit Our Official Website: https://lionel.news
𝕏 Follow Lionel on X (Twitter): @LionelMedia
📣 http://bit.ly/38rJthQ Subscribe to the LionelNation Newsletter ⇨ Trust me.
📌Follow Lynn’s Warriors on YouTube https://bit.ly/4dnyA14
🎙️ Listen to @LionelMedia, Monday–Friday from 1–5 AM ET on *The Other Side of Midnight with Lionel* — a conspiracist’s amuse-bouche on @77WABCradio. Tune in at wabcradio.com http://wabcradio.com on the 77 WABC app, or stream here: https://bit.ly/3Gke7y7 📢📱
📢 Don’t forget to LIKE 👍, SUBSCRIBE 🔔, and SHARE 📲 to keep the truth flowing and the conversation growing.
🔴 Subscribe to the Lionel Nation newsletter. ⇨ Quotidian quodlibets. RadLeft [SG] Deep State dark forces armed and poised to undermine MAGA momentum. They will do anything to interrupt and disrupt the Trump inauguration and are setting the scene. Beware. http://bit.ly/38rJthQ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://preparewithlionel.com/ ▶ 🕯️🔥🕯️ 🌲 🧑🎄 Buy 1 Gift 2 Christmas Special 🚨 DO NOT WAIT🚨 ONLY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE HOLIDAY SEASON 🔥⚠️🔥
MyPillow ▶ Use the Promo Code LIONEL and Receive a Free Gift🎁
Here’s the link → https://www.mypillow.com/lionel or ☎️Call 800-645-4965
NO DEBT WITH LIONEL ▶ https://nodebtwithlionel.com
💻Try VirtualShield Antivirus Pro For 7 Days Risk-Free! 💻 https://virtualshield.com/lionel
Get up to 75% OFF^^
=================================================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
◉ HOW TO SUPPORT LIONEL NATION
=================================================================================
■PayPal: https://bit.ly/3GKU8EW
■Cash App: https://bit.ly/3xqcU0b
■Patreon: https://bit.ly/3MbbE69
■Locals: https://locals.com/member/LionelNation
■Buy Me A Coffee: https://bit.ly/3rXlN2q
■Bitcoin: 36RgnUMJ4ARaAfkmwjC97DxcYawb3QKiak
■Dogecoin: DLxwsuYXrHcS66qKXHxZScv94RzeiSxTwc
■Ethereum: 0x0BEA4ed75384872fF418934Fc155FdC6d59C263d
■Litecoin: MFhmPMTg7hcnT8SAoWb7dFLWeZWWhhn7Zz
◉ CONTACTS & SOURCES
=================================================================================
■The Lionel Media Website → https://lionelmedia.com
■Follow LionelNation on X/Twitter → https://twitter.com/LionelMedia
■Lionel Legal YouTube Channel → https://www.youtube.com/@LionelLegal
■The Lionel Media Private Channel Subscription→ https://bit.ly/3kveTeh
■The Official Lionel Merch Store → https://bit.ly/44ZJ6b3
■Subscribe to the LionelNation Private Channel Videos → https://bit.ly/3kveTeh
■Subscribe to the LionelNation Newsletter → http://bit.ly/38rJthQ
■Email Lionel → info@lionelmedia.com
■Linktree → https://linktr.ee/LionelY2K
■Lionel Nation on Google Podcasts → https://bit.ly/3Q3UI5J
■Lionel Nation on Spotify → https://bit.ly/3FjKI3p
■Lionel Nation on iTunes → https://bit.ly/4049huv
■Lionel Nation on Google Podcasts → https://bit.ly/3QQ2hgT
■Lionel Nation on X/Twitter → https://bit.ly/3yqq4hF
■Lionel Nation on GETTR → https://bit.ly/3tDjlPf
■Lionel Nation on Truth Social → https://bit.ly/401TjRx
Video Transcript
My friend, I have been deliberately
deliberately avoiding the Erica Kirk
story, the the appraisal, the review
for a while for some obvious reasons. I
thought, listen, what what this woman
went through is just unbelievable. She's
a widow, mother of children, two
children. She she she has to deal with
that. I thought, not now. Not now. Don't
jump on her. I'm not going to be a part
of this troll mentality, which a lot of
people are because that's what social
media producer.
They make fun of Trump and they make fun
of this one and this one's nose and this
one and they'll they'll they'll through
AI you're you're dancing and I mean
there's just I thought not not yet. Not
yet. I don't want to give the old too
soon, Mrs. Lincoln.
But I got to tell you something. It is
now absolutely
pouring from every
area. People are saying flat out,
"Please forgive me, Erica. We're not
buying it."
Let me clarify. Not that her heart's not
broken. Not that she didn't love
Charlie. None of that. That's not it.
It's this
It's this performance. this this this
seeming performance it's not working and
let me tell you something there's a lot
to be said for that as a prosecutor
former prosecutor as a trial lawyer the
thing which you always give in terms of
jury instructions you ask the jury do
you believe this witness
do you believe the person who is upset
over the fact that his building burned
down that it wasn't arson
that he sure he's collecting millions of
dollars, but but he he would never ever
want to see his family business burned.
Do you believe it? Do you believe the
police officer when he says no? I I I
rather defended his rights. Do Do you
believe You have to ask yourself, do you
believe it? Why? Because you're a human
being and you know how people react. you
you know how macity works.
And I've been biting my tongue for a
long time about Erica Kirk. Again, not
because I I lack sympathy for a widow or
a mother. That's not it. But because
sympathy is not a strategy and grief and
sometimes I'm sorry, performative grief
is not a some kind of a governing model.
Now, she is the CEO of a multi-million
dollar political operation. And Erica,
let me tell you something. Those
vultures are going to bounce you out of
that so fast. And first one to watch,
Ben Shapiro. If you don't know, if you
can't see this, there's no help for you.
There's no then nobody's helping you.
They're going to use you as long as they
can to push you out in your in your gold
lame and this and the sequence and the
dabbing the I mean they they are going
to push you out. You're going to be
almost like you know bring them out.
Bring her out. They're going to roll you
out
because nobody's even interested in who
killed Charlie. We know more about Rob
Ryder and there's no we know who did it.
What are we talking about? That's
different because the shadow government
said, "Okay, that you can watch. That's
a great distraction. Here you want to
talk about a murder, talk about Rob
Rander. That's okay. But don't talk
about Charlie Kirk."
Okay. And this this Afest and TPUSA. Oh
my god. Do you not see this this cluster
that this is about?
Welcome Rob Schneider. What? The Lenny
Bruce of our generation? I don't think
so.
Now Erica, the role that you've got of
CEO comes with expectations and those
expectations are clarity and consistency
and discipline and above all please
credibility.
The problem
you keep making is unforced errors. And
every time you do
it, it it doesn't just hurt yourself, it
splashes doubt on the entire enterprise
that Charlie built.
And I'm not I'm I'm I'm not blaming you.
I'm not it's not it. Let me say this
cleanly.
It is not immoral for people to ask
questions after a major political
killing. It is normal. It is human. It
is historically predictable, acceptable,
and warranted and a good thing. In the
real world, which I think last time I
checked, we're in. When public trust is
low and information is tightly managed
and the stakes are enormous,
people do not simply accept the first
version of events
because it arrived in this nice little
package,
you know, constructed
the official narrative. Here it is.
Don't deviate from that. Don't you dare
deviate from this woman's story. That's
the story. We're not We're Don't
question it. You know how that goes.
They ask who citizens who why. They ask
how. They ask what's being withheld.
Whether it's the Epstein photos, whether
it's the president's own assassination,
whe whether why he renamed the Kennedy
Center, we ask questions across the
board. And if you don't like it, don't
be in the public eye. It ain't gonna
happen. Nobody's gonna say, "Oh, no, no,
no, no, no, no. You you remember,
nobody's going after you as a mother.
You're the CEO and they keep pushing you
out."
And after a while, when you do the same
tell all the time,
maybe that's just the way you are.
People are a different story. Now they
ask they ask these questions because
they are trying to make sense of what is
chaos.
Dismissing that impulse as
some kind of brain rot or something
might feel satisfying in the moment but
it is absolutely a catastrophic
communications and data mistake if your
stated mission is to awaken people and
and mobilize them. Okay, you got what
we're saying here? What's it going to
be, Erica? What's it going to be? God
love you and your family, but you want
this. It's like the old Jack Reacher
thing. Remember, you wanted this. Okay,
that here are what makes here. Here's
what makes this so maddening. Erica is
not being targeted because she's
fragile.
She's being scrutinized because she's
powerful.
She's not being asked to, you know, to
answer for her pain. She's being asked
to answer for her posture, her affect,
her messaging, her choices, her sudden,
you know, pivoting into the posture
of an institutional
scold, you know, how dare you, how dare.
And then going after Candace and others
like, what are you nuts? Again, I keep
telling people, ignore them. Don't
elevate anybody to a position that you
want to supposedly dethrone. Now, the
vibe that we're seeing is not just
defensive. It's it's like managerial.
It's a tone that says, "Stop looking.
Stop asking. Stop thinking. Trust us.
Don't ask any questions. We know what's
best." And if you've been in politics
long [clears throat] enough or been
alive long enough, you know exactly what
that tone triggers in people. Suspicion.
Not because every suspicion is true or
valid, but because that posture, that
countenance is the same one that every
compromised institution uses right
before it demands this this compliance
and this obedience and this obeisance.
You will not question this story. How
dare you? Have you no mercy at long
last? Sound familiar? So, what's the
core issue? It is not whether Erica can
cry on Q or glare at the right moment.
It's not about whether a body language
guy on YouTube or somebody sees a squint
on a chin jut or whether she's using
some kinds of some camper or menthol on
her tissues to to cause lacrimmation.
Those analyses are eh kind of
entertainment with the the thinnest
layer and veneer of science useful only
if you already understand how easily
people you know project their own
feelings onto
what what what other people are saying
you know somebody else's faces.
Basically, what these language folks
are, these body language, which is
fraudulent, is basically they're they're
they're showing you, they're they're
projecting what they feel onto somebody
else. But the real issue is the pattern
of communications. That's what I want to
focus on. The pattern of message
control, the pattern of this, you know
it, selective outrage. That's what we're
talking about. You see, when a CEO goes
public to attack
specific questioners
rather than to calmly establish facts
and timelines and uh evidentiary
boundaries, people notice when a CEO
treats questioning
as some kind of betrayal.
People notice when a CEO
uses this moral frame to delegitimize
curiosity.
People notice. Look at Candace. And when
the CEO seems to reserve special
hostility for certain names like Candace
Owens and Tucker Carlson and others and
the people the people who have merely
merely you think you think Erica would
be thanking them. They've been merely
demanding answers. People notice it's
like why are you finding this offensive?
What do you own this? Did somebody tell
you this? Doesn't
you ever have you ever heard about a
woman whose children, let's say, were
kidnapped, begging for people, stop
involving yourselves in this. Stop going
to the police.
Stop going to the police and demanding
ants. Nobody does this. You need all the
help you can get. It's like we're like
an intellectual kind of a search party.
This is the part that kills me. Now, I'm
not going to sit here and claim that I
know who killed Charlie or why. We're
not even talking about this. And by the
way, nobody knows yet. Nobody knows
because whoever did this knows what they
were doing. All right? Haven't caught
anybody. And there's so much stuff being
cleaned up that we may never get to it.
Okay? Let's make sure we understand
this. I'm not saying I know who did
what,
but I do love the fact that great
independent crowdsource citizens are
coming forward and saying, "You know
what? I know about this. I'm a former
Marine sniper or I'm a ballistics expert
or I was in law enforcement or I know
about hunting or I know about I have an
angle. I've got a picture. I've got this
this I love this crowd sourcing. It's
beautiful. Beautiful. Something wrong
with this. So, we're not saying we know
anything. Okay.
I don't. You don't. Podcasters don't.
In any responsible world, which I think
we are, that is what trials are for, if
it ever gets to that point. Due process,
evidence, cross-examination,
direct circumstantial evidence, direct
examination, okay? Documents, testimony,
pictures, you name it, expert witnesses,
facts. But the question is not whether
people should,
you know, pre-try a case on the
internet. The question is why the
leadership posture
seems to be that their goal is to shame
people for asking questions at all.
Especially when those questions come
from people from people who were and are
not cheering to death but are trying to
determine what what happened. And there
are many of us, many people in
particular, who took this very, very
seriously, who really were affected by
this greatly.
Remember, one of the most important
pieces of evidence ever to to encourage
folks to investigate the JFK
assassination was the movie JFK,
Oliver Stone,
not the House Assassinations Committee
or the Warren Commission. No, no, no,
no, no. And also, by the way, it was
Heraldo Rivera who released the Zapruder
film in 1975 or whatever it was on Goodn
Night America. That's what did we did
it. We are an adjunct to law
enforcement. We help things.
Ask John Walsh. All the people that were
found from a TV show. FBI didn't do it.
Cash Patel sure as hell ain't going to
do it. Oh, Cash Patel. Oh my god.
You know what happens as soon as he's
bowed from the FBI? Think his
girlfriend's going to leave, too? Just
saying. Just saying. Okay, we're just
merely trying to figure out what
happened because last time I checked, I
think it was okay for us to to mourn
Charlie's death and to feel sorry for
him. Candace, by the way, did not become
famous by whispering. Okay? She became
famous by interrogating narratives.
And Tucker Carlson, by the way, made his
made his bone, so to speak. Got his butt
in his badge. He was straightened out.
And his entire brand by walking into the
places the approved storytellers refused
to enter. Steve Bannon built a career in
the idea as well. Alex Jones, Matt
Drudge in his own day. I don't know if
you know if Matt Drudge is alive today,
but that that remember this. Remember
the whole notion that that politics is
downstream from power and that power
hides behind ritualized messaging. Now
look, you can disagree with any of these
folks or with me or anybody else. That's
fine. No problem. But do it on specific
claims. Disagree with them on on facts
that have been aduced. But but but you
can't you can't pretend that the
movement is somehow the energy doesn't
come from the impulse to challenge the
script. That's precisely what it is.
When Erica tries to shut down
that inquiry, you know, with a finger
wag or a hard stare, those stairs
that that day when she was on the cable
news shows and Barry Weiss, that was the
worst.
It it it was whoever packaged that one
after another, it became performative,
wrote, ritualized, systematic,
unbelievable.
And now she's not just attacking
individuals, she's attacking the engine.
And by the way, that afest that was a
joke this TPUA. What are these people
doing with the sparklers and this and
that and Ben Shapiro screaming at Tucker
and Tucker screaming at him and
everybody go, who what is this? What was
the point of this? Let me just say
something on a side note. If you care
anything about the conservative
movement, well, whatever the hell that
is, we are going to lose drastically in
the midterms because this incoherent
because this is about a bunch of talking
heads and influencers screaming and
yelling. And by the way, let us talk
about the unforced error, shall we?
Because this is where it gets ugly.
Okay?
And I'm sorry, Erica, but you got to
hear this. A CEO cannot afford casual
contradictions. If you build a public
persona on piety and restraint and and
uh and moderation and a certain
lifestyle story, then your past becomes
relevant. Not because you owe strangers
a confessional. That's that's that's not
it. But because credibility is the coin
of the realm, so to speak, right? If
there are clips, if there are photos, if
there is evidence, anecdote or
otherwise, or older statements that
contradict your
curated, produced narrative, you've got
to handle that with maturity. You
address it once. You clarify, specify
with pelucidity, limpidity, and you move
on. You don't pretend the internet will
not dig. Anticipate, address it, and
move on. Be able to say, "I already
answered it." The internet always digs.
You know this. This is what they do.
This is what this this new realm is. And
when you mix that with the optics of
scrubbing posts and complicated
relationships and all this other kind of
stuff, then then suddenly suddenly
I guess elevating a figure linked to
your past into a how to lead like
Charlie touring
surrogate. You know, you're begging
people to
connect dots whether the dots exist or
not. That's how optics work. People want
to know about your past. They want to
know who you are, what you did, how did
you meet, what did you I mean, who who
doesn't?
It's normally it's your past which makes
your story your negative. You came from
hard scrabble times. You you worked your
way through how you met. But then when
you find out, wait a minute, if
something is not true, that becomes a
part of your narrative. Now, [snorts]
you don't get to demand people ignore
the optics of current and past while you
simultaneously demand that they accept
your conclusions 100%. It doesn't work
that way. Now, you've also got to look,
and I'm sorry, it's happening right now.
We you might have wanted to put this off
for a while here. Here's the larger
institutional point. TPUSA is not a
grief group, okay? It's not a church
circle. It's not a an advocacy group or
some 12step thing or grief counseling.
It's a political operation and it's a
machine. And Charlie built it to win.
And winning requires trust. And trust
requires Erica consistency and
legitimacy. And consistency requires
humility. And humility requires
something involving admitting when your
tone is wrong. And right now the tone
and the a effect is wrong and you know
it. Pay attention. Is anybody helping
you on this? If Erica believes the case
is open and shut, fine. Terrific. Then
the correct move is not to not to mock
people asking questions. The correct way
and this makes I think implicit sense is
to say
subject to the effect of we are
cooperating with investigators. We will
respect the process blah blah blah. We
will not litigate evidence in public. We
will recognize the proper tribunal, the
proper forum. We will provide verified
updates when appropriate. And we ask
everyone, here's the we ask everyone to
avoid spreading claims that cannot be
verified. Maturity, you know, that kind
of thing. That is leadership, Erica.
That is credibility. And that that is
how you protect the organization without
and this is important without insulting
the base. You hear what I'm saying?
That's what that's about. Instead,
instead I'm sorry to say what we are
seeing looks like an impulse to kind of
police
the conversation, you know, to declare
certain questions legitimate, OFF BASE,
CAN'T SAY THAT. to label anybody
skeptical with legitimate questions as
malicious, conspiratorial,
to define inquiry as betrayal. Uh-uh.
That's that's just bad politics. And
it's anti-movement. It's it's the very
institutional reflex the movement claims
to oppose. Charlie Kirk, your beloved
husband, made his name by saying, "I
talk to everybody. I go everybody.
And when you talk about things like
Mossad handler and all this stuff and
the the ring nonsense and airplane
tracking, look look
we're we're we're kind of getting out of
the realm here. Sure, there's a lot of
online speculation.
Some of it ridiculous. Some of it's
interesting. I hate mere speculation
without something somewhere. Some of
it's pure theater. Look, if it's Mossad,
CIA, ISI, if it's MI6, if it's if it's
the Junior League, I don't care. But
don't sit back and say, "No, let's see
what familiar trope,
what familiar
construct can we use and burnish and
dust?" No. Maybe. Look, I've been
through this. I'm older than you.
I'm the I was red pill during 9/11 and I
can tell you oh my god there's a lot of
stuff you know I think maybe and it
never went anywhere and you lose
credibility when you're bringing in all
these suspicions that can never be
validated and as you know some of this
is pure theater I understand this some
of it's some of it is people trying to
feel important by narrating drama I know
I understand fine I dig it but if your
response to the loudest idiots become a
a blanket condemnation of questioning
itself. No,
you lose the serious people with
legitimate concerns
and that is exactly what seems to be
happening. [snorts]
Let me say this. If you do believe that
airlines or countries are tracking
people, present your evidence.
Don't read, don't tell me what it means.
Tell me what it is. I'm not stupid.
Does anybody question the past of our
own CIA? Anybody?
Do you think with the people with the
the dispatches that our government has
has included, you don't think it's
impossible for other countries to do the
same thing? They all talk to each other.
They're part of the same ecosystem. I
hate that word. Listen,
the serious audience, which I think we
all are, we don't want permission to
speculate.
They want you to ask permission to ask.
And that is why the Candace and Tucker
and Bannon and Alex Jones and whoever it
is, all of these angles matter. You can
dislike their tone. You can dislike
their volume. You can hate their
platform incentives. You can hate the
way they look and the way they scream
and their P. whatever you want. It's
okay. You could suspect that they're
monetizing controversy, which is the
funniest. You're talking about
monetizing controversy when you're in
something called Amfest and TPUSA to
raise money when basically what you're
doing is you're monetizing a memory.
You're monetizing grief, which is fine.
Monetization is capitalization. How do
you propel something without capital?
Nothing wrong with that. Okay? But you
don't get to posture as a champion of
truth seeking to to brand the truth
seekers as dangerous. They're crazy.
When it becomes inconvenient for you,
you got to stop doing this. And you
know, Erica, that they're telling you to
do this. They're telling you to do this.
And there's also a strategic problem
here that the GOP in particular, the
leadership keeps refusing to to
understand. And this this I've said a
gazillion times.
If you
treat
your own coalition like daycare, like
like a daycare or something, if you
scold them and point your finger and
shame them, how dare you, and you demand
this this subsequious compliance, you're
going to fracture
what you GOP are going to need to win
the midterms. The establishment always
thinks they can control populace by by
placing, you know, a a manager at the
top. See, this is this is nuts. That's
what this feels like. Right now, as we
speak, Dave Chappelle's routine is
blasting the internet. Do you see what's
going on there? Do you understand what's
happening?
Meanwhile, you're you're you're doing
this. You're you're playing whatever
this Disney World stuff is. This what do
you Wink Martindale? All you did is
Vanna White next. What is this? This is
not what America believes in.
See, this is what this feels like. This
is like this this managerial turn, you
know, like you know, if you you've got
some riskmanagement
CEO, this is nonsense. And in a
movement, by the way, in the movement,
I'm saying that's built on disruption,
that that posture is poisoned. Believe
me when I tell you that. So this is
where the GOP and the donor class
and the consultants and you know the the
the
priesthood of the the consultants and
the advoc and the the advocates.
They this is where they show their hand.
See they want the energy of the movement
without the questions without the
responsibility that come with it. See
they want turnout and they want the
money themselves without skepticism.
They want you there just as some kind of
a NPC little cutout standing there
clapping like some like some barking
seal. They want loyalty without
scrutiny. And they want America first
votes while quietly returning to the old
foreign policy consensus. Do you not see
this?
They want to use Charlie's legacy
selectively,
fungeibly. They want to use it as as
branding while kind of sanding down
everything that made him effective. And
if Erica Kirk truly becomes the
instrument
truly becomes the instrument or the the
the article of that, you know, sanding
down whatever, then she's not protecting
Charlie's work or his image or his his
memory. She's converting it into some
institution like all the others that he
hated.
So, let me make this
even simpler, if that's even possible,
because I want you to understand this.
If the movement is built on telling
people, do not believe the official
story, do not believe the official
narrative, ask questions, trust your
eyes, then you cannot suddenly flip and
say, "Shut up. Trust the official story.
Stop asking questions. Stop noticing.
Stop thinking. stop speaking.
That's not that's not leadership. It's
hypocrisy. It's lunacy. It's what will
kill everything. Erica, you got to know
this. And hypocrisy is how you lose
people. So, here's the question. What
should happen now? Good question. What
happens?
What do we do?
Three things. Keep it simple. The troa,
the triad, the triumphvirate, the rule
of three. First, TPUSA needs a
credibility reset,
clear communications, fewer sermons,
more specifics, more going out and
proletizing and getting in and
recruiting young people, not evidence
dumps, not trial commentary, but basic
accountability,
timelines where possible,
confirm statements if if appropriate, if
you've got them. You got to maintain a
posture of respect, a respect for the
audience that loved Charlie and loves
his memory rather than contempt for it.
Okay, you got that? Okay.
Second, I hope you're keeping square of
this. The movement needs to stop eating
itself. It's like autophagy.
You you you don't it's like a and um
call it hormmesis and something there.
You don't build resistance. You're just
destroying yourself. You're you're
cannibalizing yourself. You don't have
to love Candace. You don't have to love
Tucker or any of these other people. You
don't have to love Steve Bannon or
anybody people who really care or Trump
or anybody for that matter. But you you
you you do not even have to
love any GOP or anything.
But you can't pretend
that the coalition is strengthened by
internal excommunications.
these excommunications when when
whenever someone dares to ask the wrong
question or or or events the wrong
suspicion in the wrong tone at the wrong
time. If the goal is to win and to
govern, you need a big tent, Erica, with
strong boundaries, not some little tent
with, you know, constant purges and
you're out and you're not in. And third,
and finally, this
and I thought this through.
You, the audience, you, you, my friend,
you need to grow up in one specific way.
Stop treating a rumor as fact.
Stop sharing claims you can't verify. I
know it's fun. I know it's fun. It's
great. It's gossipy. Stop letting
provocators hijack your attention.
That's what they're doing. Trust me. do
what I do.
Make sure you ask yourself, "How do I
know what I know?" But do not, repeat,
do not stop asking questions. Do not
stop demanding transparency. Remember,
there's a difference between hunch and
proof. There's a difference between
probable cause and reasonable doubt.
Don't stop pressing for accountability.
Please, I'm with you on that. Let's work
together. Th those are different things.
You know, one is chaos. The other is
it's citizenship. It's responsibility.
Now, here was the call to action. Here
is it.
If you care about Charlie's legacy, if
you care about the mission and and the
the plan and his worldview, demand
better from people running the machine.
That's what it is. Demand humility,
demand discipline, demand clarity,
demand from Erica and others that
leadership stop lecturing the base like
a problem to be managed. And while we're
at it, get rid of Ben Shapiro. What are
you doing? Do you not understand what
this miserable twit is doing to the
cause? For God's sake, who who put him
up? You know what I think?
I'd be violating my own rule over that
one. I got a lot of suspicions about
him, but I think you know what that's
about. Look, if you care about the
movement, if you believe about what
Charlie's word was about, refuse this
trap of this personality cult infighting
and this nonsense and refuse this
similar trap of institutional obedience,
no o basis. I'm not going to be you're
not going to tell me what to think. I'm
going to ask questions responsibly. I'm
going to share facts, not fantasies. And
I'm going to tell the GOP
this in plain language. You do not get
to win on populist energy while
punishing populist skepticism.
You're going to need us. You do not get
to build a movement on question and
inquiry and investigation and then
outlaw it when it becomes uncomfortable.
We've been through this before. And no
more name calling. We've been called
racist, conspiracy theorist,
anti-semite, unamerican. Done. finished
through.
That rule doesn't apply anymore. We're
done with that. Either we are serious
about truth and truth seeking and truth
objection, objectific,
pick one. That's what we're going to do.
Pick one.
And my friend, if Turning Point or
Ramford, whatever the hell it is, if if
they're going to claim it,
claim that it stands for truth and
courage in the people,
then it needs to act like it.
It's that simple, my friends. What I've
said is nothing that profound, but it
needs to be said. And listen,
do not worry if what you are saying
offends people. Good. It's the stuff
that offends people that's interesting.
And if you find that you're getting push
back, good. Because remember, you only
get flack when you're over the target.
All right, dear friend. Please like this
video. Thank you for the very kind
comments. I read them. They're
incredible. This is this is a turning
point
in our American political system. We're
going to be a part of it. And so are
you. So join us. Be a part of this right
now. Tell me what you think. Tell me
what you believe. I've got questions for
you to answer. I've got some thoughts.
Thank you so so very much. Please like
this video. Subscribe to the channel so
you're notified of live streams and new
videos. Hit that little bell. Comment.
Subscribe to our our noble cause and
comment. Comment bravely. Comment as you
see fit.