Alex Jones Breaks Down the Candace Owens and Erika Kirk Feud: TPUSA, Defamation Claims, and Mental Health Concerns
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Zach Costello Reveals 94% Support for Candace Owens Investigation Into Charlie Kirk Assassination
1:08:17
Candace Owens Exposes Josh Hammer's Mysterious Public Execution Tweet Hours Before Charlie Kirk's Assassination
1:15:44
Jesse ON FIRE on Alex Jones vs Candace Owens: Why TPUSA Won't Sue and What That Reveals
29:44
Alex Jones Breaks Down the Candace Owens and Erika Kirk Feud: TPUSA, Defamation Claims, and Mental Health Concerns
Alex Jones shares his perspective on the escalating conflict between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk, discussing TPUSA's impact on Trump's election, questioning Candace's recent behavior and claims, and explaining why he believes the situation has reached a dangerous level. Jones expresses concern about Candace's mental state while examining the legal implications of her accusations against Erika Kirk and Turning Point USA. He also addresses the broader issue of conspiracy theories gaining traction among newly awakened conservatives who may be choosing their own realities.
Alex Jones addresses the ongoing feud between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk, offering his analysis of the situation that has captivated conservative media audiences. Jones begins by defending Erika Kirk's response to her husband's death, explaining that as a "theater kid," her way of coping was to maintain a strong public presence. He points to Turning Point USA's elaborate productions, comparing their events to Super Bowl halftime shows, to contextualize Kirk's public-facing approach to grief.
Jones clarifies his position on TPUSA, emphasizing that he's not on their payroll despite having spoken at their events. He acknowledges the circumstances that led to the falling out between Candace Owens and the organization, including the acquisition of her Blexit company and subsequent disagreements with Charlie Kirk.
Investigating the Death and Conspiracy Theories
The discussion turns to the various conspiracy theories surrounding the death in question. Jones mentions covering the story, noting "weird anomalies" that raised questions, but stops short of endorsing the more elaborate theories. He criticizes claims about TPUSA's involvement, along with allegations of Egyptian, Israeli, and French intelligence connections, and supposed secret meetings at Fort Huachuca.
Jones specifically addresses the credibility issues with witnesses brought forward in the case. He details his research into Mitch Snow, described as a "famous con man" who had previously made false allegations against his own ex-wife. According to Jones, Snow claimed his wife had attacked him with hammers and held him prisoner, but footage later emerged showing Snow was actually the aggressor. This credibility problem, Jones argues, undermines the entire narrative being constructed.
Candace Owens' Evolution and Current Concerns
Jones traces his history with Candace Owens, recalling her entry into conservative politics over a decade ago. He mentions her initial controversial project that aimed to expose conservatives, which he suggests should have been a "red flag." Despite this rocky start, Jones acknowledges Owens has done "some good work" over the years, including her time at TPUSA and The DailyWire+.
However, Jones expresses serious concern about Owens' recent behavior and statements. He recounts an incident where Owens questioned why ice wasn't melting at 30 degrees in Tennessee, and when Jones pointed out that ice melts above 32 degrees, he was attacked by her followers. Even one of her co-hosts, visiting Jones' studio, insisted Owens was correct.
This anecdote leads Jones to a broader observation about the conservative movement: "Now that we've woken up so many people that weren't that smart, but now it's so obvious the government, the media is lying to them, now they just think they can go choose whatever reality they want."
Legal Implications and Trump's Approach
The conversation shifts to potential legal consequences. Jones' co-host points out that if someone made similar accusations against Donald Trump that Owens is making against Erika Kirk, Trump would have sued immediately. They reference Owens' recent statement that "Erica needs to be arrested," highlighting the severity of the accusations.
Jones raises a concerning scenario: if something were to happen to Erika Kirk now, it could be blamed on Owens' rhetoric, but her supporters would likely claim it was a "false flag by Mossad." He suggests Owens has insulated herself from accountability—"No matter what Candace does, she's insulated now. It's never her fault."
Mental Health and Personal Observations
In a striking moment, Jones shares his personal assessment: "I've looked in her eyes. I've watched her carefully. You can see the look. I think she's gone into like a megalomania." He suggests Owens' husband should intervene, clarifying he doesn't mean to silence her but believes "she needs to go to"—implying professional help—before acknowledging critics would compare this to Soviet-style control.
Jones emphasizes he believes Owens is "mentally ill" and harbors "total scorn" with a desire to "destroy TPUSA." He compares her serialized accusations to false claims made against him regarding Sandy Hook, suggesting she's monetizing manufactured controversy.
TPUSA's Strategic Dilemma
Jones addresses why Turning Point USA hasn't taken legal action, explaining they have contracts with Owens including non-compete clauses and the Blexit agreement that likely include non-defamation provisions. He suggests TPUSA doesn't want to escalate the situation, but argues their inaction creates a problem.
His co-host makes a strategic point: by not responding legally, TPUSA is "confusing the market." Some will interpret their silence as evidence that Owens might be right or that they're afraid. A lawsuit, on the other hand, would force the issues into the open. The co-host emphasizes: "If TPUSA doesn't take any action, she gains more credibility. Period."
Jones contrasts this with Trump's approach, noting that Trump would have "stopped it a long time ago" if faced with similar accusations. He questions why TPUSA, which he credits as "one of the game changers that got Trump elected" by registering two and a half million young voters, would allow such damaging attacks to continue unchallenged.
The Broader Movement and Flat Earth Thinking
Jones concludes with a warning about the direction of the awakened conservative movement. He identifies three groups: those who serve the globalists, those fighting to build a new future, and a third group that "believes the earth is flat, that believes I'm a clone, that just believes everything's a fraud." This last group, he suggests, doesn't believe in nuclear weapons or satellites and represents a dangerous drift into unreality.
While Jones acknowledges some of Owens' legitimate investigative work, such as her reporting on Emmanuel Macron, he maintains that her current trajectory is destructive both to herself and to the movement she once helped build.
