2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Brandon Tatum Breaks Down the Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation and Common Misconceptions
Brandon Tatum, a former police officer with extensive crime scene investigation experience, provides critical insight into the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. With firsthand knowledge of proper investigative procedures and use of force protocols, Tatum addresses the widespread conspiracy theories and misinformation circulating online. He explains the forensic evidence, the significance of Tyler Robinson's parents turning him in to authorities, and why the FBI's handling of the case demonstrates legitimate investigative work rather than a cover-up. Tatum emphasizes the importance of understanding legal procedures, probable cause statements, and digital forensics before jumping to conclusions about what happened.
Representatives from Angel Studios expressed deep gratitude for Charlie Kirk's support of their company. They emphasized how Kirk stood by them during both challenging and successful times. The studio's leadership acknowledged the profound impact Kirk had through the countless connections he made throughout his life, stating their commitment to continue spreading good news in his memory.
Brandon Tatum's Unique Perspective on the Investigation
Brandon Tatum, a former law enforcement officer with extensive experience investigating crime scenes and murders, has emerged as a voice of reason in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination. His background as a first responder who had to make sense of crime scenes gives him unique insight into the investigation process. Tatum has been creating content on YouTube that provides a calm, steady voice amid the chaos of conspiracy theories and misinformation.
Tatum's approach combines his law enforcement training with what he describes as godly wisdom in how he disseminates information to his followers. He distinguishes between people who are simply lost and don't understand investigative procedures versus those who knowingly spread misinformation for clicks and subscribers.
Understanding the Investigation Process
According to Tatum, most civilians lack access to the records submitted to court, text messages, witness interviews, suspect interviews, and forensic evidence. He emphasizes that people spreading theories online haven't interviewed anyone involved in the case and have no actual evidence to support their claims.
For those wanting to understand what's happening in the case, Tatum recommends reading the affidavit and probable cause statement submitted to court. He explains that law enforcement agencies cannot lie, deceive, or include false information in these documents, as they are sworn under penalty of perjury. If evidence doesn't support what's stated in these documents during trial and initial hearings, the entire case gets thrown out.
Tatum finds it unreasonable to believe that someone like Kash Patel and his team would risk their entire careers and legacies to botch what he calls "the most important case of our lifetime."
The Unprecedented Nature of Parental Involvement
One of the most unusual aspects of this case is Tyler Robinson's parents turning him in to authorities. For 33 hours after the assassination, Robinson remained at large while the FBI worked to identify him from images they had obtained. They received approximately 10,000 tips, which they followed up on, but hadn't yet identified the suspect.
Robinson's mother identified him from the images and confirmed with his father that it was indeed their son. The father then convinced Tyler to turn himself in, coordinating with a deputy sheriff neighbor to facilitate the surrender without a SWAT team conducting a dynamic entry.
Tatum finds it unreasonable to believe that a father would willingly turn in his son knowing he could face the death penalty unless he was confident his son had committed the crime. According to the FBI, Robinson actually confessed to his parents that he did it, though Tatum explains there's a difference between confessing to family and pleading not guilty in court.
The Legal Strategy and Court Proceedings
Tatum believes the legal battle isn't about whether Robinson is guilty or not, but rather about trying to avoid the death penalty. This explains why the defense didn't want cameras in the court and wanted Robinson to appear in plain clothes rather than prison attire.
A person can confess to their parents while still pleading not guilty in court as part of a legal strategy to avoid the death penalty. This is a common approach in capital cases and doesn't indicate a conspiracy or cover-up.
Digital Evidence and Forensic Analysis
The investigation includes substantial digital evidence, including a Discord chat where Robinson allegedly wrote something to the effect of, "Hey guys, I don't know if you saw the news, but it was me in Utah." The FBI is investigating all 20 people who were part of that Discord chat.
Tatum explains that most people don't understand forensics. The FBI conducted a forensic extraction of all content on Discord from Robinson's communications with that chat and every other chat he's been involved in. They also extracted communications from all 20 people in every chat they've participated in.
Additionally, investigators extracted all electronic communications between Robinson and his boyfriend (a transgender individual). While Tatum acknowledges that some people find the communication style in these messages confusing or suspicious, he points out that without evidence of how Robinson communicates in all his other text messages, it's impossible to make a true judgment about whether anything is actually suspicious about word choices like "vehicle."
Cell Phone Tracking and Location Data
Beyond message content, investigators can track Robinson's cell phone location data and metadata. A new witness came forward claiming they spotted someone on the roof approximately a week before the assassination. Investigators can use cell phone forensics to determine whether Robinson was at that location a week prior.
The affidavit submitted to court states that investigators found searches and Google Maps searches of the university on Robinson's phone. Forensic analysis can determine how much time he spent on particular sites and other details that are part of the ongoing investigation.
The Difference Between Good Faith Confusion and Deliberate Misinformation
Tatum draws a clear distinction between people who are genuinely confused about the case because they lack investigative experience and those who should know better but spread misinformation anyway. He compares the situation to police shootings he covers, where many people don't understand use of force policy, relevant laws, or how laws are prosecuted, leading them to reach incorrect conclusions despite good intentions.
The difference that angers Tatum most is between someone who is mistaken in good faith with good intentions versus someone who knows better but deliberately spreads "hatred and stupidity" to get clicks, subscribers, and make money.
The Call for Patience and Trust in the Process
Tatum's message is ultimately one of patience: let investigators do their job. If during the trial, with proper cross-examination, it becomes clear that authorities haven't done their job properly, then it's appropriate to judge them on that basis. But premature conclusions based on incomplete information and misunderstanding of investigative procedures don't serve justice.
He acknowledges that people are hurting and looking for answers, and many genuinely don't know what they're talking about. He extends grace to those individuals while maintaining that the truth needs to be spoken regardless of whether it fits popular narratives circulating on the internet.
