Happy Monday everybody. Today we are going to
discuss or rather I'm going to introduce to you a psychological strategy uh that I refer to as
David Hogan. Somebody you guys remember David Hog of the Parkland shooting tragedy. Of course
you do. Well, it seems like Turning Point USA is now engaging in this strategy of David hogging the
public. And I wanted to be clear that is downright manipulative. And I've really had enough of it.
Frankly, what happened over the weekend is that their TP Action COO Tyler Ber went on a little
bit of an ex binge. I don't recommend it. Which was then highlighted by Alex Clark, who has a
show over there on Instagram. And I think it's therefore fair for us to turn our attention
back to them. So, welcome back to Candace. [Music] So, let me put it to you this way. I'll
give you a different scenario. If at this very moment McDonald's publicly announced that
their CEO was stepping down and they were going to replace him with somebody else, nobody would
care, right? Like there's not going to be any public outcry about them doing that. The average
person doesn't even know who the current CEO of McDonald's actually is. But however, giving you a
different scenario, if out of nowhere McDonald's announced that they were getting rid of the Big
Mac, that they were changing their French fries, and they're doing away with their chicken nuggets,
there would probably be a reaction to that. People would be pretty angry. It would probably start
trending. Uh, and it's because the reality is nobody actually cares about the corporate
structure. But if you change the menu items, that actually changes the substance of the company
for people. A very recent example of that, by the way, is the Cracker Barrel scandal, which was
hilarious, but it was a good point for everybody to learn, right? corporates over at Cracker Barrel
effed around and they found out pretty quickly that that old man on the logo, that inanimate
old man that was with the cracker and the barrel actually had more meaning to the public than their
entire corporate division. They were ready to just walk away from it all because they got rid of
the old man and his barrel. Now I raise this only to say that I have seen multiple political
organizations within recent years especially when money starts pouring in right there's this like
arrogance that sets in and they start to delude themselves into believing that they're smarter
than their customers that they're smarter than their audience so to speak right like the magic
is actually the corporate structure audiences uh I want to be very clear will catch a vibe pretty
quickly audiences are smart they're perceptive they will sense when something is off. And the
harder that you try to convince them that their senses are not real and that they are imagined,
the more obvious it actually becomes to them that their suspicions are correct. Something's not
right. Now, to just keep up with the same analogy, Charlie Kirk was essentially the old man on the
Cracker Barrel logo. People were invested in Charlie Kirk. We have at this moment no definitive
understanding of what happened on the day that he was assassinated. But what we do know definitively
is that the feds are lying to us. That is obvious. It is abundant. If you have a if you're able to
think thoughts, you recognize that something is very wrong with the story that has been presented
to the public. And I think that what the public doesn't understand, and I count myself among the
public, is why it seems as though Turning Point USA executives, and I'll say seems, are not even
remotely interested in challenging that official narrative. They're not interested in challenging
it publicly, at least. In fact, I think it was an ex-user that pointed out, he put it rather bluntly
when he said, "So, they want us to forgive Tyler Robinson, but to attack the people that are trying
to solve the murder of Charlie Kirk." Like, that's not right. It doesn't feel right. It doesn't feel
good of threats of lawsuits. We're collecting evidence of what what are we even talking about?
And I want to say that what's been bothering me in particular are the micro lies. Seems that they're
suddenly in the business of telling micro lies. tiny little misrepresentations, tiny little
half-truths that right out of the gate seems altogether unnecessary. It really makes me wonder
who are they protecting exactly. You'll see oftent times they and other influencers will invoke
Erica as the reason that it's not appropriate to ask questions. It's just not appropriate
while Erica is still mourning for you guys to ask any questions. And I'm just going to come
back at you with some common sense. What sort of widow wouldn't want people to investigate
the assassination of their husband? She has not explicitly said that. But the influencers are
invoking that, right? They're invoking like you just it's not appropriate right now for people
to be asking questions. That's what I mean when I say they are David hogging us. Okay, you could
also use another example um somebody that was on the right, Kyle Kushv. What essentially means
is that when a tragedy takes place and we are all we we are emotional, our emotions are raw.
Me especially, I think this was the first time where I couldn't really check my emotions. I I I'm
just now like moving out of the grief stage. There will be people that then will try to manipulate
you, right? They will try to manipulate you by using that strategy of saying, "Well, it would be
really wrong. It would be really wrong for you to look beneath this layer or to ask a question about
this and it, you know, it would be an injustice to Charlie Kirk's legacy. Really, if you really loved
him, then you shouldn't do this, okay? Because the tragedy just happened. And they did this David
Hog, you're not allowed to question David Hog, like he suddenly became an authority. And no
matter what he said, we were kind of told by the journal journalists that it just it made perfect
sense and he should go to Harvard. And you know, obviously to the extent that anybody suffers and
survives a a school shooting, I'm with you. And I think that that's totally fair. But then when
you go beyond that, it starts to feel a little bit like you're emotionally manipulating us and
that you're actually trying to silence people who have valid questions or criticisms or concerns.
That strategy, like I said, it worked on me in the beginning. I was definitely completely worked by
it. And I was feeling like even though I knew that they were telling white lies that I should just
allow it and to instead focus my entire attention on just unpacking the federal lies. But you know
what? Over the weekend I realized actually no. Lying full stop is weird. It's weird after a
tragedy. It is weird after someone that you purport to be your best friend. You're so close.
Why are you telling micro lies about that person? And actually by exposing those lies, perhaps
it will reveal a bigger picture because what would motivate it? What would actually motivate
it? Now, I'll give you just one example here, and we're going to get into some some stuff
that's rather bomb bombastic if I'm being frank, but one example that I bit my tongue on a couple
weeks ago, was when influencers randomly went on a full attack, like full attack mode against me when
I very casually, you guys watching the series, very casually mentioned that Catholics were hoping
that Charlie was going to take the next step and con and convert. Like, of course, I'm Catholic. Of
course, what would be wrong with me sharing that? Everybody was sharing their stories about Charlie
and the conversations they were having. But for some reason, Candace saying, and I'll sum it up
effectively, it was like two sentences. Charlie was going through some spiritual changes towards
the end. Catholics were hoping that he'd take the next step because he was praying the rosary. I
never said he converted because he didn't. That would have been dishonest. But people were somehow
really angry. Somebody clearly hit the panic button. Suddenly, a bunch of videos were being
made disputing the narrative. People were going, "I knew Charlie and he was truly evangelical to
his core." Blah blah blah blah blah blah. And I want to tell you this. It felt coordinated.
It felt fake. It felt unnecessary. But most importantly, it was untrue. Okay? It wasn't true.
And I'm going to share with you some more truth so that you can contextualize it. Charlie
was attending mass weekly. He was sometimes even attending mass daily. He was not attending
Pastor Rob McCoy's church. As I mentioned before, uh yes, he was praying the rosary. Charlie, in
fact, was wearing the St. Michael pendant when he died. Okay, as has already been publicized,
Erica took a Catholic bishop with her to pray over his body on the day that he died. These are all
indisputable facts. And it is also a fact which was presented by Megan Kelly uh that a few weeks
before his death, Erica had a priest come over to pray over them when some witches thought it would
be funny whatever uh to put a hex on him. Okay, that's a lot of things that were happening behind
the scenes and the people at Turning Point USA knew those things to be true. Okay, they knew
everything that I just shared with you. They knew for a fact. So, I was a bit astonished when
Andrew Kovette and Alex Clark similarly jumped in in this inauthentic attempt to dissuade the
idea that Charlie was softening on Catholicism. It read to me like just sheer hatred of Catholics
for no reason at all. Here's what they said. I'll jog your memory. I want you to listen to this now
in the context of all of the additional details that I just shared with you. Okay, take a listen.
Was he becoming Catholic? No. But he really loved Catholic mass. He loved the ritual of it. Uh
he loved the beauty of old Catholic churches and the stained glass. And him and Erica would go
sometimes. Yeah. Well, Erica is a cradle Catholic. Uh, but she ended up kind of like me. I grew up
Catholic and first communion and went to Catholic high school, but then I ended up becoming
a Christian in college through a Protestant church through a non-denominational kind of more
experience. It's actually a Presbyterian and then it was kind of non non non-denominational. And
and I think Erica kind of follows that same path. She and I share that. Also, by the way, I I just
want to draw attention to she's posted a photo of her and Charlie and the kids in mass before
and somebody in the comment section said, "Oh, are you guys converting?" And she said, "No, we
just like attending sometimes." So, she herself had said no. Yeah. And I think Charlie, one of one
of the things Charlie really hated worshiping in like a a gym, you know, or a some some sort of
kind of blank space that that you just turn into church. I don't there's no problem. He didn't have
a problem with the the act of that. He just didn't prefer it. And he loved again the ritual, the
ancient, you know, feel of a Catholic mass and the fact that everybody around the world that
was worshiping as a is Catholic. He loved he loved that. So he had some really big theological
hang-ups with that. You can go check the videos out him debating with Michael Nolles, you know,
in good fun. I mean, they were dear friends, but they loved kind of debating the whole Protestant
versus Catholic thing. Now, given everything that I've I've shared with you, does that conversation
register as like totally and completely authentic or kind of trying to be like, yeah, no, like he
loved the architecture of things, but beyond that, nothing was happening like that's not that's not
fully honest. And it registered to me like a cover up of sorts. And I was wondering like what are we
exactly covering up? Like I wasn't going Catholic gang gang. Wasn't trying to bring back a 30 years
war. I was just sharing the communications that I had with him. And now I felt like suddenly so many
people were racing to establish that his legacy was anything but Catholic Catholic, right? Like he
was super duper Judeo-Christian. And ironically, it was Judeo-Christianity that I was challenging
him on personally, like privately. Um, and I was speaking to him about the political pressures
of it, the way that I felt um, because of last year that it registered to me like more of a cult
than a true theology or a religion or a religious aspect rather. And it was back in February of
this year when out of nowhere he's the one that actually messaged me and said um I'm sorry of
of and said Catholicism is sounding better and better in February of 2024. This is kind of when
we started having that discussion. Uh we should chat soon. Catholicism is looking better and
better. Okay. I then offered back to him a chart just showing how the phrase Judeo-Christianity
kind of is really associated with the dawn of the nation of Israel. Right. And we did chat about it.
We chatted about talked about it a lot and I was thrilled like I said and I was being honest that
he was attending mass. Okay. But I want to again state that Charlie was not attending Rob McCoy's
church. He was attending mass. So it registered to me again as somewhat disingenuous when Pastor
Rob McCoy came out and effectively asked me to, you know, stop looking into all the things that
had happened in the leadup to Charlie Kirk's assassination or at least asking me to pause it
rather would be more fair of an interpretation until the memorial. Right. Okay, I'm going to
jog your memory here. Here is what Pastor Rob McCoy wrote on his Instagram after I exposed
the now infamous Hampton's meeting which took place. He wrote this. Charlie Kirk was my friend
and I was his pastor. I want to simply say this regarding Candace Owens. Charlie Kirk was a friend
to Candace and never publicly spoke poorly of her. Although he disagreed with her, he never operated
nor entertained gossip or innuendo concerning Candace. My only comment I offer regarding Candace
is this. only wish that at this tragic time of mourning she would be the friend to Charlie that
he was to her. He would never have treated Candace or her family in such a way had God forbid
this tragedy been hers. All friend loves at all times. Proverbs. Now I want to be very clear
if Charlie was a friend of mine. I sure hope if I was assassinated in front of the world that he
would that he would raise hell to figure out what actually took place in that day. That's not being
a friend. A friend is not someone who stays silent uh when lies are being told by the federal
government. That's not a friend. Again, emotionally manipulative. The family can't have
you finding out who actually killed him. The family can't have you looking into those things of
who was pressuring him behind the scenes. That's just that's not good for the family. It bothers
me. I have to be honest with you. That bothers me. I don't even like that to the untrained eye
he's kind of representing himself or representing Charlie as like a current congre congregant of his
church. I feel like a lot this year I have been feeling as though those as though these pastors
are just not as honest as they should be. Right? Is that the vibe? Like a lot of pastors are not
really so concerned with the truth is what I would say. So we should zero in here on Rob and what his
motivations might be, right? Why did he decide to post this after I revealed that Hampton's meeting?
Well, you should know, I think most people do, that both his son and his daughter-in-law work
for Turning Point USA. So whether you want to represent that or not, they have a financial
stake in the future of the company. He heads up the faith division. So Charlie's faith and
what direction it was going into would actually matter, right? It would actually matter if
Charlie, and I never said he was going to, decided one day to become Catholic. It would
have financial implications. I want to be clear, I never had a conversation that that Charlie was
in the process of converting. Okay? But Rob in particular knew for an absolute fact that Charlie
was done with Israel bullying him. That's what bothers me so much about this man. Him allowing
these headlines. Charlie's pastor speaks out, you know, crushes Candace because of what
she said. Not whatever. I don't like it. He knew and others knew that Charlie was done
with Israel bullying him and I am now going to present you proof of what I am saying. This is
an actual group chat which happened 2 days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. There were nine
people in total on this chat including Charlie uh and Rob McCoy. I'm going to protect the
names of the other seven for now. To be clear, I might actually release a name every day of this
week, but I want to show you this because suffice it to say, Rob McCoy was on this text thread, and
I think it helps contextualize him as a person in my view that he would attack me for telling the
truth about the pressure that he was facing. Take a look. So, Charlie writes in this group chat,
"Just lost another huge Jewish donor, uh, 2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm
thinking of inviting Candace." Somebody writes, Charlie writes, "Jewish donors play into all
of the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to
leave the pro-Israel cause." And somebody writes, Sedona writes, "Please do not invite Candace.
That might feel good short term, but it's not good long term. In my opinion, like all groups,
you're going to get a wide variety of opinions. that nasty free will thing that God bestowed
on us. Makes life frustrating at times after the dust settles a bit maybe. So again, this
is 48 hours before Charlie was assassinated. He was very clear and he was very explicit and he
did not back down. Not in that Hampton's meeting which they're all lying about, nor in this text
thread. I'm not going to reveal the names of the other seven. Actually, you know what? I disagree
with myself four seconds ago. Let's just throw in Josh Hammer for funsies. He's on this chat.
Okay, so what are we to make of that? Okay, now that I'm showing you this and showing
to you that the conversations were real, I want you to reflect. And it took me a lot of
patience to allow the lies that were being woven and the misrepresentations of people that were
pretending that I was just what high on lying about Charlie and the pressure he was under.
The attacks that not just me, Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly faced for trying to stand up and tell
the truth about what Charlie was actually going through. Why are you hearing it though from me and
Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly? Is that weird? You got people that are hosting a show. Have they in
like one honorable thing come out and said like, "You know what? F a couple of these donors
who made his life a living hell in the last couple of weeks. Why haven't they done
that?" There also a rabbi in that chat. Why hasn't anybody made that move to at least
say to vindicate what I have been saying about what he was going through? That registers to me
as very suspicious. I'm going to frankly say that it's suspicious to me. It makes me think that in
the way in the same way that Charlie was being pressured by money that you might be now run by
that same money that those same donors might be running you to correct the ship and to focus
yourselves on eulogizing Charlie as something and someone that never once flinched, never once
for a single second doubted the Israeli cause. Now they want us to suddenly believe the best
way to honor Charlie is to shut up. The exact opposite of what he quite literally laid down his
life doing. Answering questions. Turning point. Answering the questions is what he was doing in
the second that he died. Okay? And we all feel we all are feeling spiritually the same way. So I'm
just going to say it. They're not grieving right. It's not up to us to decide how people grieve. But
I will say unequivocally that you shouldn't grieve by lying or by gaslighting. Is that fair? Can
we all agree? You should not grieve by lying and gaslighting the public. They want us to believe
that the only way that we can support and honor Charlie's legacy is by donating our money. But it
would not be supportive for us to try to figure out who killed him and why the feds are lying.
we should instead just trust the feds and excuse their little halftruths that they're telling along
the way. Now, on that point, they keep trying to make it seem like it's completely normal that
four minutes after Charlie was shot, someone on their team nervously raced to grab the SD cards
uh specifically from the camera that is behind Charlie's head. And um that was because during
that time I think it's like trying to make it normal that his instinct was to stand on Charlie's
chair to actually violate a crime scene. Um but also to mysteriously just grab the SD card out of
the camera. Right. Not only are they pretending that that was completely normal, but they're also
presenting it as though it was a heroic act. it was like a forthright clarified act to do in that
moment and that anyone who uses their own eyes and sees it as maybe a little bit suspicious are just
in the business of spinning conspiracies. Now, that's exactly what was communicated by Andrew
Kovat um when he sat across from Tucker Carlson who was hosting Charlie's show and gratefully
Tucker Carlson instantly responded with a much more sensible approach. Take a listen. By the
way, just one other conspiracy theory I just want to snuff out here. One of our dear friends that
literally from the very beginning started with us and love Charlie like a brother, he grabbed
the SD cards out of the camera afterwards. And there's all these conspiracy videos about why
did he grab the SD cards? Well, first of all, they're in the possession of the FBI. Okay, it's
not like he took them and like ran off with them. Second of all, I asked him personally. I said,
"Why did you do that?" And he looked at me and this was his answer. He said, "Because I know
people can be evil." And he did not want that footage being grabbed by somebody. There was
videos of people after the incident going and stealing hats off the table. I mean, so I'm
so grateful he did that and that that was his instinct. He's like, "I'm depressed to know that
that was why I did that, but I knew that I had to protect that footage because I know I wanted
I mean, you know, you're recording in like 4K, you know, and so I'm so glad he did that, but
Charlie knew the existence of evil." And so, can I just say I think that people can feel
the existence of evil in that just to put in a sympathetic word for people who are trying to make
sense of this and coming to the wrong conclusions, I think they're motivated for the most part
by pure intent. I think they don't trust the authorities. have every reason to feel that way. I
know that for a fact. Not the Trump administration in general. Like Yeah. Yeah. We're not, you know,
there's been a lot of lying and it's corroded the trust. That's not their fault actually. They're
the victims of it. Good point. Thank you for saying that. Yeah. Thank you, Tucker, for saying
that. And this is the reason why Tucker is so big because he he has this perspective. He understands
like what the average person is thinking here. And the average person looks at that and I think
it's shady. and you know saying that there was this heart-wrenching moment where you were worried
because people were stealing stuff on the table, but also you took the SD card out and not the very
expensive camera, which is if you were worried about stealing and theft, maybe you would take the
camera. But more importantly there is he says that the feds that he that he he gave it to the feds
right now. He doesn't insinuate obviously that they don't have the footage. Turning Point does
have the footage. That's very clear. I saw part partially the footage which means it made it back
home. uh or maybe they had it back home because they were um recording it live. Whatever it is,
uh it was being live streamed. But what he said actually conflicts with what Tyler Ber is about
to say, what he said over this weekend. Okay, Tyler Ber, like I said, he's a COO of Turning
Point Action and he went on this kind of bender uh worse kind of bender, Twitter bender, defending
the organization. and he thought he was defending them against public sentiments during which
time he refuts what Andrew Kovette is saying about the SD cards. Andrew says the Turning Point
employee was worried about theft. But Tyler says that actually he was instructed to secure the
SD cards before the campus went on to lockdown. Now here's the tweet so I can show you that uh
somebody said rightfully emotional manipulation and falsely equating scrutiny as some form of hate
speech is not going to work here. You and Kovette admitted that the staff tampered with cameras and
the most crucial video evidence in the largest political assassination in decades, hiding Mason
look guilty. And Tyler countered, "Dude did not tamper with anything." Yes, he did. It's a crime
scene. The law enforcement officers asked them to turn them over immediately so they didn't get
lost in commotion before they took everyone into lockdown. Now, that is just not true. That is not
true. What Tyler was saying is not true. I spoke to that Turning Point individual. I as I told you
and he never once mentioned that police officers I explicitly asked him why did you take the SD
cards out specifically of the camera behind and the answer that I was given which sounded more
like Andrew what Andrew Kovette said you know I was emotional I I knew that Charlie was dead
and my instinct he told me was to take make sure that I secured the footage so that Erica would
not have to see it again like he didn't want Erica to have to see it and have to relive it.
That is what he said to me on the phone. Nothing about police officers. No one's ever heard police
officers asked them to secure the footage before lockdown until Tyler Boyer tweeted this weekend.
I don't like it. Okay. I just don't like it. Now, to be fair, uh Tyler is making it clear that he
is responding to all of these tweets um or exes, whatever we're supposed to call them, because
there have been people he says that have flat out accused the organization of having a hand in
Charlie's murder. He doesn't share when or where exactly that happened. Uh I think people feel
you're being dishonorable by not questioning the narrative, but I don't I don't I haven't read
anybody that's explicitly accused them of murder. In fact, um the the tweets that he's responding
to all seem to be pretty fair in my opinion, you know. Um, now regarding the missing campus
footage, there is a user that begged Tyler to file an FOIA request and that user wrote this. Please,
I beg you, focus on getting the security footage of the sequence pre-jump off the Losi building
where we can see Robinson in shot position and corroborate the story like file an F, sorry, file
an FOIA, get that footage, keep it simple. and he responds and he says, "Guys, there's camera
footage all over that campus that the police have plus all the cameras that we had. They
likely won't release it until the trial." Now, there's just one problem with that narrative,
right? If they have all this footage, they're just not releasing it because they just want to
what? Uh they're just worried about the trial. They want to make sure they win the trial. What's
wrong with that narrative is the manhunt that took place. If indeed they have tons of footage from
all these different angles and some of it in 4K, which they do, this is why we've been saying the
feds are lying from day one, then the first time that that footage should have been deployed, was
during the 33-hour manhunt, right? Why didn't they release more footage at that time, right? they
were, if they were actually interested in catching the killer, why only release a blurry image when
there is, as he mentions, footage everywhere, all over that campus, every inch. Are we
supposed to honestly believe at that time their thought process in the middle of a manhunt
was well let's not release too much except for a blurry image because I know we don't have him
but in case we do have him when we do get him we want to make sure that we are um able to try
him by not releasing footage which makes no sense by the way and I think this is what happens when
a company loses they're as South Park ribbed him master debater right what they're saying does not
make sense these people could not win in college campus debates without Charlie. Okay? Because the
reality is if that if releasing footage, okay, if releasing clear footage of what happened on that
day means that you are going to lose in court that it probably signifies that the person that you are
trying to bring to court didn't do it. If they're somehow vindicated by the footage, if you're like,
I released the footage of him jumping down on the center and I show him firing a shot, but like
that totally vindicates him, then you got the wrong guy, right? Having more footage, examining
more footage, and examining more evidence should further incriminate Tyler Robinson. It should also
go a very long way in getting people off of these quote unquote conspiracies. Common sense, this is
what I said in the beginning. release the footage, which you do have in your possession. It's not
like just the feds have this footage. Release the footage because then people will move on from
quote unquote conspiracies. So everything they're saying right now doesn't make sense. Um and the
p they're not smarter than the public, right? and Turning Point is not going going to survive
this sort of an attitude name calling threats to sue um calling people demonic possessed by
demonic spirits because they're rightfully asking questions of the most high-profile political
assassination since JFK. It's just not going to work. Free PR advice. It is not going to work. I
want to show you one more thing too because I I am quite stunned by the audacity um to call me out uh
Alex Clark to like call me out by sharing on her profile something that's just fundamentally
untrue. But before we do that, I'm going to throw to a couple of our sponsors. First, pre-born
because I have watched many people that I'm close with be vilified because they've stood up for
truth. I've felt the sting of injustice myself, but I've also felt something else which is
courage. I'm done uh playing defense. think that we should not be watering down what we
believe to be palatable because silence is not kindness. It's actually consent. And right now,
the greatest silence is around the lives that are ended before they even are allowed to take their
first breath. If we're going to call ourselves defenders of life, we should act like it at all
times. Which is why I'm asking you to join me to fight back with action, with truth, with love.
Uh $28 is what it costs to give a free ultrasound to a woman that's in a crisis and considering
abortion. So, for just $28, you can help her see a life inside of her. You can give her truth
that the culture most definitively will not. So, you shouldn't sit this one out. Don't wait for
permission. Be bold. Be clear. Be unapologetically pro-life. Go to pre-born.org/candace right now.
Give $28. You can also give 10 times that amount. If you can, this is the line that I think that
we have to stand on. We have to stand for truth and what is right. We have to save lives from
abortion and stand firm in the gospel. Again, that is pre-born.org/candis. Provide an ultrasound
for $28. Also want to tell you guys about the Comet AI browser because I know you probably spend
a lot of time on your web browser every day. How much time do you spend clicking around online,
searching, scrolling, typing endless tabs? It's a lot. And now there is a new AI web browser from
Perplexity that's called Comet that is completely changing the way that you are able to interact
with your browser. Using Comet feels like having a personal assistant living in your web browser
that can actually do things for you across the internet. Uh yeah, literally doing things across
the internet, not just giving you answers. You can ask, comment to uh type, search, scroll for you.
What I love most is that it takes that weekn night chaos away from you and it turns it into a simple
stressfree thing. Like you can research dinners, how you can put together dinners. Just a few
taps. I get personalized meal plans based on the family's preferences. Comet orders the groceries
for me and gets them delivered right to my door. Comet can shop for you, make reservations,
book travel, uh summarize articles or videos, send to emails, schedule meetings, and a lot
more which will make your life easier. So go and take back your time online. Download Perplexity's
new web browser comment and let it work for you, not the other way around. Check it out at
pplxx.ai/candis. Again, that's pplx.ai/candis. Lastly, I want to tell you guys about the
wellness company because uh did you know that most methylene blue that's being sold online
right now is not is actually the same grade that's being used in fish tanks, which is pretty gross.
You need to watch out for lowquality bottles that are untested for heavy metals and made overseas.
You can trust, however, the wellness company's Recharge, which is a doctor formulated supplement
combining powdered methylene blue with NAD+ and PQQ. This methylene blue is USPrade, ensuring top
tier purity for maximum safety and effectiveness. This is not the sketchy stuff uh you will find on
Amazon. Recharge is formulated with researchbacked ingredients to optimize brain function and
cellular repair. while supporting clean, lasting energy. Tap into cognitive and metabolic
support and that helps you stay energized, focused, resilient all day. Choose a trusted
formula made for your body, not for fish tanks. Feel the difference with enhanced mental clarity,
sustained energy, sharper focus, and protection against cognitive decline, and know it won't turn
your tongue blue. Head over to twwc.health/candace and use code candace and you'll get 15% off plus
free shipping. Again, that's twwc.healthcandis and use code candace. All right, you guys. So, how
are we supposed to honor Charlie, right? You honor Charlie, of course, by donating a turning point
USA and shutting up and trusting the feds. Don't question anything because it's just not right or
whatever. You shouldn't even question the things that Charlie was questioning, right? The spin is
in. I got really annoyed last night going through. Somebody tagged me and said, "You see Alex Clark
posted and tried to make it seem like I lied about the new Doge Department when I literally shared
the email from Charlie." They're even using this kind of like I I call it Christian slop. Okay?
Because that what they're serving up to you is, well, if you're a good Christian, you shouldn't
do this. Like they kind of saying it's demonic. You're possessed by a demon. If you want to pursue
truth, said literally, "No one ever but Satan incarnate." Okay. Truth is truth. It is always
appropriate. Another one of these uh talking points are coming out is people are doing this for
clicks. They're motivated by money. Do you guys understand the tens of millions of dollars that
Turning Point USA made in the two weeks following Charlie Kirk's assassination? It is, it would be
insane for a person to suggest that if a random guy on YouTube catches a million views discussing
ballistics, which there have been many gun guys who have done videos on ballistics and caught a
million views, that that's somehow immoral because they're maybe going to make $10,000 if they keep
that up for an entire month. Like, that is insane. And it it actually relies on financial literacy to
think that that's immoral. Good for them. Good for them. If you have a small account and you somehow
got a million views because you told the truth, then bless you, okay? Don't let them shame you.
They're doing it for clicks. Oh, uh, no, their account talks about ballistics all the time. This
is now just a political assassination, the most high-profile ever, and people want to understand
every aspect. So, we're clicking and we're watching these individuals that look like they
know what they're talking about, especially in the absence of any truth coming from the quote unquote
authorities. So, what are we supposed to believe that the more moral thing um would be for us to
behave like Turning Point USA employees? You know, Alex Clark calling you out, you kidding me? Should
I do what she did? And I it would have been more moral for me to invite the Wall Street Journal
a a literal week after Charlie is murdered to photograph my me in high boots standing over his
memorial site at the office like the out outside memorial vigil where people mourn and drop off
flowers and gifts because that's exactly what Alex Clark did. And I thought it was icky. I thought
it was gross. But I didn't say anything because everybody mourns in their own way. But I got to
stop saying that. I got to stop saying everybody grieavves in their own way. This is the article
that was published on September 18th. So, we can assume that they at least photographed her one day
and interviewed her one day earlier, right? That's being charitable. So, this was done latest again
one week after Charlie was assassinated. Again, take a look at this. Pull that up. I'm going to
pull this photo up because I just want to look at the photo. This is literally her being shot in
front of the gifts that people are dropping off for Charlie. Maybe it's photoshopped. Doesn't look
like it is to me. Um, even if it was photoshopped, I would be losing my mind. I I I don't understand
um how anyone would let this go out and think that it's okay if they knew Charlie. I couldn't
even speak to the press that week. I still haven't spoken to the press about Charlie Kirk,
actually. Not I haven't even given one interview about Charlie Kirk because it felt icky to me. I'm
just focused on investigating his murder. Anyways, I want to read a little blurb from this
article. Again, published September 18th. Alex Clark was about to head to the airport for
a work trip to celebrate the first anniversary of her podcast when she heard the news. Her boss,
Charlie Kirk, had been shot. She says, quote, "The very first thought that popped into my head was,
I'm so glad that Charlie knew Jesus," said Clark, 32, who hosts the Maha Friendly podcast, Culture
Apothecary, Returning Point USA. The second thought was, "What will happen now?" And the
third thought was, "Thank God Trump is president. I don't know you." People around the world didn't even know
didn't even know Charlie. Okay. Third thought, thank God Trump is president. Like MAGA. Did
you go MAGA? Did you go like I'm glad he knows the Lord and then MAGA? What are we missing here?
What what like I does that feel okay at all? Goes on to say she praises the FBI director Cash Patel
and his deputy Dan Bonino for their leadership in the hunt for the suspect. What's so crazy is
that we have them in office because of Charlie Clark said. So honor the feds quick pick outside
and also mega mega hard. That is like I'm sorry. I get it. Everybody grieavves differently. Okay.
But not that way. The last thought that I had as I spent days crying, okay, had difficulty physically
pulling myself out of bed. Felt like I was being a bad mother was, man, I'm sure glad Donald
Trump is president. MAGA. I didn't feel that way. Didn't feel that way. In fact, I was angry.
I remember feeling angry when Trump moved to kind of like do a a same time post BB and Yahoo and
then like publishes a picture of Charlie with an Israeli flag behind was pretty angry about that. I
thought yuck that's gross. have you no dignity and respect. Post a picture of him with his family,
you know, trying to like already sew seeds to into people's minds that like, no, he he like kind of
died for Israel, loved Israel so much. This would be appropriate, especially in the context that I
just read to you. It was gross. But anyways, I I I just I don't know why. I don't know why, but the
people that are critiquing us for investigating the murder are not critiquing themselves. They're
not holding a mirror to themselves. Anyways, Alex has decided to share a total halftruth PR spin on
another tweet from Tyler Ber where he responds to someone asking about Charlie establishing a
Doge department. Again, we presented that to the public. We showed the internal email, the
internal memo that went out. It was Charlie in his own words. We showed the whole email. I didn't
read the paragraph where he announced that Justin Strife would be the COO, but we read the entirety
related to the Doge Department. And here's what Tyler says about that. He says she took a sentence
and made something up. TPUSA doesn't audit every year. Always has. Charlie constantly look for
ways to make everything we do more efficient. That's TPUSA. It operates eight times more
effectively than any other similar operation. So, what did I make up when I shared an email and
Charlie said he wanted to establish a new Doge department? Why would he call it new if he was
doing it every year? And wow, what foresight you had as a company that's been around for like
10 years or more maybe more 10 years that you were doing Doge since the beginning. No, you're
conflating and it's dishonest. It's dishonest. The audit has fall. Okay. F all to do with Doge. The
audit is what 501c3s are instructed to do. Audit, get an independent auditor and audit yourselves
or else the IRS will hound you. Now, when you are auditing yourselves, I will guarantee you the
Clinton Foundation audited themselves annually. That does not mean that there is not corruption.
It does not mean its means that you're doing things that are above board from a government
perspect government perspective. It does not mean that within your own organization there is
not corruption. That is the reason for a Doge department. At least according to what Elon Musk
said, nobody when he established Doge with a V Ramoswami was thinking that he was going in there
because he was going to see if they're violating the IRS laws. No, I think he went in there to see
wasteful spending and to see where the money was going, where our tax dollars was going. That's the
vibe I got. So, they're relying on us to be again financially illiterate, to not understand how
it works. I shared a 501c3 lawyer with them. So, I met her in her offices with Charlie and she
explained the reasons why she um said that you got to get an independent auditor. I actually
think that for organizations of a certain size, you're required by law to do an annual audit
if you're 501c3. I think it's state byst state that guides that. But to present this like this
means we're above board. I have a feeling some people are going to die on that sword because the
reality is is that big companies inevitably you will find corruption. And I'm hearing some stuff.
Okay. a lot of contractors. That's something that you can do as just one example. That's completely
legal but utterly immoral is if you're outsourcing all of the millions of dollars to contractors and
you're getting kickbacks. That's just one example. Okay. So, I take money from donors and then I show
that I'm paying out to um a contractor who doesn't work for Turning Point USA, but that contractor
is then somehow paying me back. That would be something that wouldn't flag the IRS, but then
would flag a CEO and a Doge department if they started looking at where the money was spending.
I hope that clarifies matters. Now, shifting gears only slightly. I don't often or really ever speak
about my faith journey, right? Because I'm still on it. Uh, and I don't want to make a mistake
or be wrong. Uh, and in many ways, I kind of feel like this pressure that I don't want to let
Catholics down because I don't know everything. And I prefer the people that have been Catholic
forever to speak on things as I'm still a student. But I do want to say that a major clue for me that
being non-denominational uh was no longer working for me happened because of things politically
when I tried to express certain questions about the modern state of Israel and was instead
met with what I can only describe as cultlike behavior. You're seeing it right now, right?
Judeo-Christian after Judeo-Christian making videos can it's like cultlike behavior. You can't
leave, right? There's only one way out of here. people quoting scripture to actually fulfill
what became quite obvious to me was just their political lens and yeah people taking money to do
that keeping it above bar it's not illegal but you are taking money you're taking free trips what are
your motives here if you're citing scripture to defend the actions of BB Netany and Yahoo you're
a fraud of course you're a fraud and if you're accepting money to do that in the process you're
worse than a fraud anyways I want to show you guys this clip that someone sent me this was a sermon
which was given by a pastor on September 21st, 2025. Now, it's not necessary to name the
Judeo-Christian pastor, right? I'm never trying to uh put any fire on them because I actually think
what they're doing is important because I find out about all these sermons because their congregants
are sending them to me, right? They've got the CIA in their own congregation and people are going,
"And I stopped attending that day because I realized something's not right here." I want you
to listen to this pastor's words because you might too feel similarly inspired to recognize that
something is wrong. And I want to also be clear here. It's not every pastor. It wouldn't be fair
for me to say that. Um but pastors that have a very strong political bent. Something's not right
there. All right. Now, to tee this up, the title of his sermon is, "What has defiled you?" And he
has decided for this particular sermon to pull from Paul's letter to the Corinthians. In that
specific biblical passage that he cites is 7:1 and it reads, the Bible reads, "Therefore, beloved,
since we have these promises, let us cleanse ourselves from everything that defiles body and
spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God." Now, you don't need to be a priest or a pastor
to think right now about what you might perceive uh is the point of that passage. Probably thinking
through it. Yeah. Yep. It's important. Body, spirit. Um probably not. What you're thinking
right now is that this has something to do with Megan Kelly. You're probably not thinking
Paul wrote this letter to the Corinthians because there's a point that he wants to
prove about Megan Kelly. But he's going to get there. That's how this pastor is going to
get there. He's going to explain that. Take a listen. Why am I bringing this up? Because I
was watching a interview with Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly and this is what they said.
Everyone under 30 in America is against Israel. The older generation's not because we've
seen the six- day war in 1967. And there wasn't a narrative that was so prevalent right
now with with with foolish people that are so deceived like a Candace Owens and like a
Nick Fuentes and young people are eating that up and they're changing their philosophy
on what these people say that do not do do not base your ideology unless somebody has a Bible
open. That is where your ideology comes from. You're gonna be like that treehugging hippie
mom that I'm trying to save her kids from being bitten by a rattlesnake and dying and she's all
worried about some habitat when she knows she's not welcoming in rattlesnakes in her home. And our
ideologies when we really really think about them, they've been formed by a society that is not
basing everything they believe out of the word of God. And I challenge you today. If I've
said anything that you don't think is right, bring bring your Bible and show me
because if I'm wrong, I want to know. Challenge accepted. Challenge accepted. I really
like look, far be it for me. I'm not a seminarian. I really don't think that is what Paul I just
don't I don't think it was about Nick Fuentes. It call me crazy. I know you guys do on Sundays,
but I don't think it was about Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens and the modern modern created
state of Israel. Again, I could be wrong. I'm open like you to being incorrect, but it's just
like there's something that is so fundamentally disgusting and I hope you guys agree about using
the Bible to justify your own personal rants. Um, using the Bible to justify why you're attacking
somebody, preaching a certain like just start a podcast. You can be like me, right? I'm not
sitting here going, "Turn your Bible here and you are, you know, defile and blah blah blah." And
what this really means is like that turning point is like that's there's something so incredibly
evil about that. He has a quick second here uh when he wraps up his points about me that I want
to get to because I've starting to realize I don't even think he knows what defile means. Actually,
take a listen. You need to go to the Lord and say, "What has defiled me?" Hopefully, some of you
that have been defiled with the nation of Israel because you've been in an echo chamber of Nick
Fuentes and Candace Owens, that defilement has now come off of you and you're going to block
them because they're anti what scripture says. What defiles you? What defiles you? So, I think what he is saying that if I'm being
charitable here, he's suggesting like you'll somehow be saved if you block me on Insta. What is
this? Actually, what is that? I'll tell you what it is. It's completely heretical in a theological
sense, but it's also unhinged. It's just unhinged. He looks unhinged. It's like he it's like so
much relies on him getting his point across. So he just like opens his Bible, points to a verse,
and just throws it up and says whatever he wants to. He's basically me on like AIM when I was in
the eighth grade picking out quotes from like, you know, whatever those quote websites are and
just like throwing it on my away message. There's no rhyme or reason that he's doing this, just a
feeling that he has and he wants to express it and justify it using a quote without its context
or even understanding of why that quote quote was said or why that biblical passage was written.
Uh it's wrong and it's also deranged. everything that's happening right now to continue to justify
what the state of Israel is doing, the modern state of Israel is doing, which has nothing to do
with the ancient um Israel, the biblical Israel, is they are now trying to censor us, trying to
control our speech. They are murdering children. And so, the more that you defend this and that you
pretend that this is what God wants, the more that you will expose yourself, right? The more that
you expose yourself. Even this headline is crazy. uh this this this came out that like their Tik Tok
which we we covered this before their moderation team like IDF soldiers uh and BB Netanyahu saying
we're taking over Tik Tok like my agents are going to get that in a purchase that's what needs to
happen so that we can win announcing essentially psychological warfare on on the American people
because they don't think we can think for ourselves and decide who we want to follow on X
all by ourselves apparently they're going to ban the juice box emoji Right? Because people because
they can't talk about the modern state of Israel have been using like the apple juice because juice
can sound like Jews. And so they're now moderating that. And I will say this, that's going to be
funny because it's just it's going to be a game like whack-a-ole and all we can do is laugh at it
because these people are savvy. These Tik Tockers are like they're pretty savvy on the internet.
They're going to be some gonna be announcing like let's use this emoji instead from now on.
This represents the modern state of Israel. And before you know it, there's going to be no
emojis that are allowed on Tik Tok. Actually, it would be funny. The funniest thing that they
could possibly do right now is every time you want to talk about Israel on Tik Tok, use the term
Tik Tok and see if Tik Tok will ban Tik Tok from Tik Tok. That's how we win. Like, if that happens,
we win. Okay? We get to laugh forever that we made Tik Tok ban Tik Tok because Tik Tok is actually
code for Israel. The modern state of Tik Tok. That's what I want you guys to do because that
would just be funny. And we have to actually have fun because it's getting so crazy. We have
to actually have fun and continue to smile and laugh and to be happy warriors for truth. Uh
because Charlie always believed in being a happy warrior. That is that is just a fact. Uh anyways,
you guys, let's uh let's let me read some more of our sponsors for today before I get into some
of your comments. First, I want to tell you guys about Pure Talk. Our society works because of
the freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment. Everyday Americans should be able to speak openly
about honesty, family, and traditional values without retribution. And that's a principle that
Pure Talk proudly supports. They sponsor my show, which allows me to stand strong behind the
microphone every day and share the truth with you. You want to support brands that defend freedom
and pro-American values. I encourage you to switch your wireless service to Pure Talk. You're going
to get great 5G coverage on an extremely reliable and secure network. And with plans from just $25
a month, you'll save a ton of money. Pure Talk believes in creating American jobs and supporting
small business. So, if you're a small business owner, you can save even more while enjoying white
glove service. Stand with companies who share your values. Go to puretalk.com/oens to switch to
my wireless company. Again, that's pure talk and you'll save an additional 50% off your first
month. puretalk.com/owoins today. Also telling you guys about Nimi skincare because there is a
reason that we all love the fall, the crisp air, the changing leaves, the season of transition, but
it's also pretty tough on our skin and it's the end of the summer sun, the new autumn wind, and
it can leave us our skin especially looking tired, dry, dull. So, if you're looking in the mirror and
feeling like your skin has lost its radiance for the season, then I'm going to tell you guys about
my go-to, which you guys know is Nimi Skincare. Nimi is the reason that my skin stays clear, firm,
and glowing no matter what the weather brings. Their three-step anti-aging routine is the perfect
defense uh for this seasonal shift. It's packed with powerful clinically backed ingredients
that work to restore your skin's barrier, which is exactly what you need to fight off that
dry autumn air. It also boosts collagen production to help with those fine lines. It locks in deep
moisture. And it brightens your complexion, bringing back that healthy glow that you had in
the summer. Uh here's why I love the most. Because they're Americanmade in a world of skincare
that's dominated by a lot of foreign brands. Nimi formulates and produces everything here in
the USA, and they deliver world-class quality while staying true to the values that they hold
dear, which are faith, family, and freedom. So, you shouldn't have to compromise your values
to get incredible skin care with Nimi. You certainly don't have to. So, as you prepare for
the new season, make sure your skin is prepared, too. You'll get an exclusive 10% off your order
at nimiskare.com. You use code candace 10 at checkout. Support a brand that supports this
country and see the results yourself. Again, that's nimiskare.com with promo code candace
10 for 10% off. And I want to remind you guys about American financing, too, because
the cost of everything is out of control, and many people are relying on credit cards to
cover essentials. If that debt is piling up for you, we should know that you're not alone.
First and foremost, Americans collectively owe over 1 trillion in credit card debt. You might
have considered reaching out to my friends over at American Financing, but maybe you hesitated
because you don't want to give up that low mortgage rate that you're enjoying. Well, you
should know that there is good news because they've created the smart equity loan, which is a
solution that's designed to help you take control of your finances without touching your current
mortgage. You can um uh unlike a heliloc rather, which can have varied interest rates, the
smart equity loan offers a fixed rate, which means one predictable monthly payment, which
will give you peace of mind. This loan allows you to leverage the equity in your home to pay off
your high interest debt, free up your cash flow, and keep your existing low mortgage rate intact.
It only takes 10 minutes to get started with no upfront or hidden fees. Call American Financing
and start saving now. Call 8007951210. That's 8007951210. Or visit americanfinancing.net/owens.
That's Owens. That's americanfinancing.net/owens. Camas Owens. Camas Owens. Um, somebody wrote me
a message and was like, "Canis, you said your name wrong." They missed the Operation mocking
pastor joke. Um, Camas Owens is my pastor stage name when they're talking trash about me.
I actually loved that so much. All right, let's get into some of your comments. What is on
your mind? I'm going to be in so much trouble, man. I'm going to get off here airwaves and be
like, she's not She is just Yeah, I'm there. I'm there now. I just don't like it. I just not
getting the right vibe, but I know everybody else feels it, too. And I'm just really tired of these
influencers making the videos are all saying the same thing in a different way. I think we're dumb
and like it's all happening organically. It's like it's just tiresome. It's really tiresome. So, if I
have a take on everybody so we can get some truth, then that's what it is. That's just what it
is. Jennifer Merchesen writes, "Praying for your safety, Candace, keep digging, please. You
are on to something. We need truth." Thank you, Jennifer. Uh, that is a massive donation. I
really, really appreciate that. All of you guys that have been donating to the show to support
us, like I just want you to know like we really appreciate it and we see it. Melissa Forberg,
similarly, the uh really nice donation here. Spent the weekend researching the Cabala. It was to say
the absolute least terrifying. Thank you. Yes, it is very important. Of course, if you are in my
book club, we're about to really get into it. By the way, tomorrow we start uh the book, which they
don't want to resell, which is crazy. I don't know where David Beccan's uh children are, the author
of the book. He is Jewish himself, but I'm just want you to know that you're being like they're
blocking money from you. They don't want the public to read this book which you can download
and find it online for free but like still it's pretty crazy that they are now realizing
people are catching on that book will dive into the Cabala. Uh it's very important to know
similarly like I've said from the beginning we have different denominations within Christianity.
That's kind of what this whole episode has been about. I don't know why one like I I I don't know
why so many evangelicals have such vitriol for Catholics. The feeling is not mutual. Genuinely
the feeling is not mutual on the Catholic side or on the Orthodox side. Uh and so it's interesting
to say the least. But similarly within Judaism there are different sects. There just are and
and we don't realize that. We don't know what they believe in. We just go, "Oh, it's Judaism.
It's the it's just, you know, it's the Pentitude, the first five books of the Bible." No, there's
also the Talmud. There's also the Cabala. And to just not actually study and understand all of
those differences makes us extremely ignorant and very likely to be indoctrinated into one of those
religions convinced that it's actually modern science which is what's actually happening. I
think we kind of live in a a cabalist society more than anything else. And I think that this book
that we're going to read will help you get there. We really have we go there in the book club. We go
there. And so if you'd like to join the book club, we are starting a new book tomorrow. Tomorrow will
be an introduction an introduction to that book. We will wrap up this last book that we read which
is similarly terrifying which is the assault on truth. The scales will fall from your eyes if
you read the assault on truth to understand how they will lie to protect the most evil people
in the entire world. You have to destroy your belief system about Sigman Freud and then you're
ready to learn about what Sigman Freud actually what his major contribution was. And that's
the book we're diving into next. Sigman Freud in the Jewish mystical tradition is the name of
that book by David Ban that we will be starting on tomorrow's book club. Uh Lauren writes, Lauren
Hooland writes, "You mentioned the suspicious way so many of the individuals surrounding Charlie's
case are new to their role. I live in Dallas and I noticed after the ice shooting that Daniel Kimo,
the Dallas police chief, is new to the role as of April. We are all being lied to." Yeah. It's
almost like they're like actors. You know what I mean? You're going to just play the role of
sheriff when we do this thing. you're going to play the role of this and everyone's going to be
so new. It's pretty lame. It is pretty lame. And it it again questions we're allowed to ask them.
Expose the truth writes, "I have been a Catholic my whole life and attended a non-denominational
church once and found it to be cringey like that pastor that you showed the video of. Keep fighting
for truth. I'm sure Charlie is cheering you on from heaven. Praying for you." You know, actually
to tell you how emotional I was after Charlie's death was really just not myself obviously,
but I was upset. I was almost upset with my priest because I went on Sunday and I expected
him to like say something about Charlie Kirk, which is not what he should be doing. Like you you
can dedicate a mass to somebody, but he didn't say anything about Charlie Kirk. And I was like, oh,
like I don't like that. And then now that I've removed from that, I actually appreciate that.
Like that is what I actually find that I love about the Catholic religion is like there's not
there's no political bent there. like that is what I love and I attend um you know the Latin mass and
I what I was upset with I now really appreciate in the retrospect that you know there's no drop
of politicism when you're in the room. Jennifer Barney writes, "I admire you so much. It's easy
to drop something and go with the flow. Don't drop this. Something is not right. Thank you,
Candace, for being our voice." Um I'm grateful. I'm actually so grateful I can be your voice
and I'm grateful that you see that when they're attacking me, they're just kind of attacking
people for asking the most basic of questions. And again, I would like to I'm so grateful to Tucker,
I think, is also one of our voices. He immediately interjects. He's like, "Well, let's be fair here.
The feds have lied about everything always. So, why should we think this is different,
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.