Candace Owens Reveals Erika Kirk Was Anti-Israel Before Charlie Kirk's Death and Bill Ackman Summit
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Candace Owens Uncovers French Connection to Charlie Kirk Assassination and Brigitte Macron Investigation Cover-Up
55:28
Candace Owens Uncovers Financial Concerns and Unanswered Questions Surrounding Charlie Kirk's Death Investigation
46:11
Candace Owens Exposes NCRI Report Labeling Her a 'Digital Assassin' Targeting Erika Kirk
13:09
Candace Owens Reveals Erika Kirk Was Anti-Israel Before Charlie Kirk's Death and Bill Ackman Summit
Candace Owens shares a troubling memory from Tucker Carlson about Erika Kirk's stance on Israel before Charlie Kirk's death. According to Owens, Tucker told her that Erika was "hardcore against Israel" and "hated the pastors" around Charlie during a dinner in July. This revelation stands in stark contrast to Erika's current pro-Israel position and raises questions about her influence on Charlie's shifting viewpoints before his assassination. Owens expresses concern that Erika may have pushed Charlie toward anti-Israel positions while privately maintaining different allegiances, particularly after attending a pro-Israel summit at Bill Ackman's Hamptons home. The pattern of weekly emotional breakdowns followed by attacks on those asking questions continues to trouble Owens, who sees it as a deliberate strategy to avoid accountability and investigation into what really happened to Charlie Kirk.
Joe Rogan entered the conversation, asking obvious questions as a rational thinker wondering why nothing makes sense about Charlie Kirk's death. During his podcast with Cameron Haynes, Rogan expressed frustration about unanswered questions surrounding major events, including asking "Who killed Charlie Kirk for real? Like, what is that? Why is that story so clouded in mystery? And why did they pave over the ground right after the shooting?"
Owens noted the irony that Rogan's best friends and the people around him would be upset to hear him speaking like that, questioning why he won't just accept the narrative. She pointed out that no one seems to have fewer questions than Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, and Erika Kirk.
Erika Kirk's Role as an Emotional Asset
Owens described Erika as what she was called in a Department of War executive office email: an "emotional asset" that keeps getting boosted every time she gets emotional. According to Owens, Erika's job is to cry and then for people to be scolded that it's their fault she's crying because they dare to try to figure out who killed her husband.
This pattern repeated over the weekend on Erika's show with Pastor James Katis when somebody wrote in a question, prompting an emotional breakdown. Owens expressed frustration that she's then suddenly attacked because Erika is having an emotional breakdown in public. She characterized it as a repeat tactic to garner an emotional response, making Erika appear as a damsel in distress so people feel bad for her.
Owens clarified that she doesn't find it entertaining or funny when Erika cries or says she just wants to go home. What she wants to know is why this was being boosted at the White House, and why the Department of War said this needed to be the number one clip by morning within an hour of it taking place. She wants to know who recorded it and is tired of this overriding strategy.
The Emotional Breakdown on Camera
During the show, a viewer question was read about a woman who had been married for 10 years to a hardworking farmer. The question described finding faith, getting baptized, and embracing motherhood fully, then asked why it seems like the closer you get to God, the harder the devil works on you. This prompted Erika to break down in tears on camera.
Owens questioned why this was an unrelatable question that should have been skipped, calling it a weekly installment where a pastor tells viewers it's demonic while Erika becomes emotional. She pointed out that Erika wasn't "just trying to be with her kids" as she claimed.
The Tucker Carlson Revelation About Maine
Owens shared a memory that came back to her after the previous Friday's show. She clarified that she was not on vacation in Maine but had gone up for just one day, eight weeks after giving birth on May 2nd. She explained that after Charlie's assassination, she felt like she went through some sort of brain trauma and it took a while to come up for air and think clearly again.
After finishing Friday's show, she went upstairs and told her husband she had remembered something about their trip to Tucker Carlson's house. Before she could even say anything, her husband immediately recalled in front of the entire team that Tucker had told them Erika was "very hardcore against Israel." Owens had completely blacked out on that day trip and forgotten what Erika had said.
The Context of Tucker's Dinner with Charlie and Erika
Owens explained what deeply troubled her about this revelation. Tucker had expressed this information in the manner of friends discussing shifting viewpoints within their friendship. There was no incentive to be assigned to that conversation. Tucker was expressing frustration about what happened at SAS (presumably a speaking engagement) and being a friend to Charlie and Erika, discussing the amount of pressure Charlie was under because of his speech at SAS.
Tucker loved Erika and said she was "hardcore" anti-Israel. He also said she hated the pastors that were around Charlie. What this means, according to Owens, is that Erika as the wife and confidant of Charlie Kirk was pushing him to be more anti-Israel. This is why it troubles her so deeply.
Erika Playing Both Sides
Owens emphasized that Erika was pushing her husband to be more anti-Israel—the very thing that the majority of the world believes killed him. The question Owens raised is whether Erika was speaking from both sides of her mouth.
After having this dinner with Tucker where she expressed anti-Israel views, Erika went with Charlie to the Hamptons and sat across from Bill Ackman at dinner when Benjamin Netanyahu was called. Owens described this as Erika playing both sides and pushing her husband to be anti-Israel—the thing that the majority of rational people believe killed him.
The Complete 180-Degree Turn
After Charlie's death, rather than asking any questions about Israel or telling the truth about his shifting viewpoints or her own shifting viewpoints, Erika had a complete 180-degree turn. She now says that people who ask questions about Israel have "brain rot." She accepts the Tyler Robinson narrative, has taken over Charlie's company, and is partnering further with pro-Israel narratives and pro-Israel pastors—the very pastors she told Tucker Carlson she hated.
Owens stated the stark timeline: Erika was anti-Israel in July before she went to a pro-Israel summit at Bill Ackman's house. None of this is making sense, and that's what bothers her.
The Dark Possibility
Owens posed a disturbing question: What if Erika intentionally pushed Charlie to be more anti-Israel, encouraging him with words like "No, babe, you got this. No, push back harder on that donor. No, no, you tell this guy this"? Then what if powerful interests said, "No, we can't control him. We can't bring him back. We have to take Charlie Kirk out"?
Owens acknowledged how dark and twisted this sounds but insisted she is telling the truth about what Tucker said to them after they got off air: He had dinner with Charlie and Erika, and Erika was more anti-Israel than Charlie.
She directed her question straight at Erika: "So what the hell changed, Erika? Why couldn't you find it within you to tell the truth about Charlie's shifting viewpoints?"
God's Timing
Owens expressed gratitude that she had forgotten this information for a while, saying she never questions God's timing. She was grateful she forgot about the trip because she knew something was bothering her about Erika's allegiance to Israel, and now she understood why—because Erika wasn't loyal to Charlie on this issue.
She concluded that Erika lied to her husband about her viewpoints, and questioned why she did that. Owens suggested a possible answer: So Erika could tell powerful interests, "Well, you couldn't control him, but you can control me. I support Israel. I'll be the CEO. Sorry you went that way. It's very sad. I can be your queen."