Up Next
Brian Ference Investigates Why Tyler Bowyer Cancelled Charlie Kirk's Final Audit Directive at TPUSA
15:15
Candace Owens Uncovers Egyptian Military Planes Tracking Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA Events Nationwide
1:03:45
Brian Ference Exposes Tyler Bowyer's Pattern of Cover-Ups and Corruption at Turning Point USA
23:40
Charles Ortel and Jason Goodman Examine Turning Point USA's Financial Records Following Charlie Kirk's Death
Charles Ortel and Jason Goodman explore financial irregularities at Turning Point USA after founder Charlie Kirk's death. They examine nonprofit filings, allegations against Tyler Bowyer, and discuss why the FBI's involvement may prevent proper scrutiny of the organization's finances. Brian Ference's research on Redacted reveals new details about alleged coverups. The conversation also addresses the broader pattern of government control over public opinion, from Project Veritas to Fox News, and how Kirk's campus activism threatened that control. Ortel draws parallels to Clinton Foundation corruption and questions whether a planned audit will proceed.
The Unusual Circumstances Surrounding Kirk's Death
Jason Goodman opens by acknowledging the seriousness of examining Charlie Kirk's death while explaining their choice to use a "Who Killed Charlie Kirk" poster inspired by Who Framed Roger Rabbit. He notes Kirk's significance and the unusual level of attention his death has received compared to other public figures.
Goodman presents research showing that spouse involvement in murders occurs in approximately 10% of cases, with perpetrators typically being someone the victim knows. While emphasizing they're not accusing Erika Kirk of wrongdoing, he argues the public's suspicion is statistically warranted.
Government Control of Public Opinion
Charles Ortel discusses how controlling public opinion has become a classified objective of the federal government at the highest levels. He traces this pattern from the Soviet era through China's rise, questioning why the Obama, Bush, Biden, and Clinton families worked to "sell out America" and why Britain forfeited Hong Kong.
Ortel describes the Biden regime as "naked in what they were doing to anybody who would challenge him," citing Senator Joe Manchin's claims that his life and family were threatened. He emphasizes that if progressives gain control in 2029, the Trump family faces serious consequences.
The Arctic Frost Revelations
The conversation turns to revelations about Jack Smith and Merrick Garland's targeting of elected officials. What began as nine people—eight senators and one congressperson—expanded to 160, then to 460 within a week. Ortel describes Jack Smith as "a despicable human being" based on his record at the Justice Department's Office of Public Integrity.
Ortel recounts being interviewed by FBI agents in December 2018 just as his wife Clarissa was dying, questioning whether the timing was deliberately chosen to catch him emotionally vulnerable. He draws parallels between these tactics and the broader pattern of government harassment of dissidents.
Charlie Kirk's Impact and Threat to the Establishment
Ortel argues that controlling 535 members of Congress, nine Supreme Court justices, and state-level officials is easily managed by the 35,000-person FBI. However, managing students on college campuses—the future political leaders—presents a different challenge.
Kirk's campus activism, where he would hand the microphone to "blue-haired maniacs with nose piercings and tattoos" and then thoughtfully dismantle their arguments, represented "true education and bravery." Ortel believes Kirk moved the needle in the 2024 election when Trump won the youth vote.
Drawing on family history, Ortel shares how his great-grandfather Austin Carlos Gormley died at 42 from appendicitis, cutting short what classmate Luke Callaway (later Montana Supreme Court Chief Justice) believed was a path to the presidency. Ortel suggests Kirk might have followed a similar trajectory, potentially serving eight years as president and inspiring followers like populist William Jennings Bryan.
The FBI Investigation and Kash Patel's Opposition
Goodman reports recent developments where Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Kent are attempting to take over the investigation, with Patel strongly opposing making the Office of the Director of National Intelligence the lead counterintelligence agency. Ortel interviewed Joe Kent, describing him as someone who ran for Congress in Washington and has military background.
Ortel warns that opening a national security level investigation gives investigators the ability to "sweep under the rug the pesky details" that journalists might want to examine, arguing there should be a proper murder investigation instead.
Financial Irregularities at Turning Point USA
The hosts discuss major questions about the finances and filings of Turning Point USA and its allied organizations. Brian Ference has been researching the nonprofit and recently appeared on Redacted, presenting evidence of coverups involving Tyler Bowyer, who has been accused of sexual harassment and assault.
Ortel explains the vulnerabilities inherent in organizations targeting campuses: "You've got a lot of students with student loans who are trying... Kirk basically didn't go to college, right? He just started this organization and it became a major factor throwing a lot of money around. You're a college student in debt and you don't have a job. Some of you are going to do anything you can do to get into the income stream."
Brian Ference's research allegedly shows that hot young college girls were hired and then sexually assaulted, with victims being hit with lawsuits citing non-disclosure agreements. After Kirk's death, a planned audit into financial impropriety appears to have been cancelled.
The Nonprofit World Under Scrutiny
Ortel reflects on writing about the Clinton Foundation for Breitbart in 2015, noting that people were "dumbfounded that a presidential charity would be this poorly run and this boldly fraudulent." After investigating charities for 11 years, he now believes "most charities have very bad elements associated with them."
Large charities with international operations or chapter structures require particular scrutiny. Ortel raises questions about how chapters spend money, whether "a beer blast" constitutes legitimate charity operations, and how organizations account for leftover food and alcohol from parties—especially when dealing with college students who need spending money.
The Evidence Bounty Challenge
Goodman discusses his evidence bounty, now at $4,314 and running until November 4th, challenging experts to disprove his thesis that Charlie Kirk was shot from behind by a projectile traveling at 500 feet per second. He emphasizes that challengers must understand his specific claims about the iPhone's 240 hertz mode recording at 240 subframes per second, detailed in his article citing the iPhone's Dolby Vision HDR and Dolby patents.
The bounty remains unclaimed despite critics who dismiss the theory without engaging with the technical evidence presented.
Video Transcript
Charles, I hope that people don't think
that we're making light of a serious
matter with today's image of who killed
Charlie Kirk, but I know you are a big
Roger Rabbit fan, so we did this. Well,
you know, I I think we should tell the
crowd that, you know, this is J. I've
been a secret apprentice of Jason. And
actually, I did this poster in my
factory. [laughter]
No, of course not.
>> It was an idea though, not to shift any
blame, but I was a little reluctant to
make a cartoon, but I think it is
appropriate. And you know, I'll tell
you, Charles, it's interesting because
you're not the only person who is, let's
say, skeptical of Erica Kerr. can you
know anytime somebody kind of like
ascends
so soon after the death of somebody and
so what I did was Whoops sorry what I
did was I went and looked at like hey
how often is um a husband and wife like
how often is the spouse the suspect in a
murder and I think you might be pretty
surprised um or maybe Not. But I
actually found this whole report from
like this is guys from like Duke Law or
something. Husband wife homicide and
it's something like 10%.
Oh, I would have thought it's higher
than that.
>> Yeah. Well, what they said was that it's
pretty frequent that the perpetrator is
somebody that the person knows simply
because the average person just has no
motive to kill a random stranger. But,
uh, spouse on spouse murder is like
10.5% or 9.5% some to me shockingly high
number. And then it's more men killing
the wives, which I don't condone, but I
definitely understand. And uh then so I
mean, again, I'm not saying Erica Kirk
did anything, but it's an interesting
question to explore. And the suspicion
is not misplaced is what I'm getting at.
>> Well, if you think about the uh uh let's
start first with the the left-wing
political spectrum. I mean, when the
Soviet Union was a thing and communist
China is still a thing, but when the
both of them were things, it was
accepted that the United States
government could go after um anybody who
suspected of being part of the, you
know, the the communist supported
leftwing in America was accepted. Nobody
nobody thought gave a hoot about it,
right? And so it's not a shock to
imagine that over time those hippies who
thought they were just, you know,
freeloving and having a good time could
could become over decades corrupt and
actually enthralled to the communist
party of China communist communists and
specifically to the Communist Party of
China which has been on a tear upward
tear since 1949. I mean, when you when
we said it before, but go look at this
UNCCTA
statistics for the size of the of the
consumer market inside China in 1970.
I mean, people were literally lucky to
be eating dirt sandwiches in China. And
before that, um, when you know, I talk
over here in Paneang,
uh, to people about their background
because I'm just interested where how
long was your family here? They
explained that you know to to come to
Singapore and come to Paneang in the 60s
I mean you had nothing here. I mean
Paneang actually had more than Singapore
but yet it wasn't very developed.
Poverty in China was was mindn numbing.
I mean people literally sold their
children. They had nothing to eat.
Right? And so now you look at China
today and it's certainly a respectable
rival to the United States. Um and uh
and then you ask yourself, you know, why
was Obama Obama why were Obama and the
Bush family and the Bidens and the
Clintons why were they doing what they
did to sell out America? you know, why
did the British
um forfeit their their property rights
to Hong Kong? Why did they do that? You
know, who was paid off to make that
decision? Because that was a crazy
decision.
>> Why did they
>> Well, because I think people, you know,
people were the Chinese were smart. They
said, "Look, you know, how much is it
going to cost us to to buy off the prime
minister of the UK? Let's let's figure
out how to do it. You know, let's buy
off Oxford and Cambridge. let's buy off
the media, you know, we're playing a
long game here and it's not our money
anyway, you know. So, this has been
going on for a long time. You look at
the Biden spectacle now and think back
to what it was like when we were doing
our our podcast. I was fearful,
you know, of of I was I, you know,
dialed back some of my criticism
because, you know, the the Biden regime,
the Obama supported Biden regime was
naked in what they were doing to anybody
who would challenge him. You have that
book by Joe Mansion, a senator, Democrat
senator, saying that his life and his
family's lives were threatened.
You know, it's ridiculous that we
tolerated this. It's it's frankly
ridiculous that Trump with everything to
lose now. I mean, he's at, you know,
he's clearly on the back nine of life
and he's he's got five kids, all of whom
are very wealthy.
If Eric Small Penis and AOC and these
people gain control of the federal
government in 2029,
you know, the Trumps are finished.
And you know, we we we you and I have
been talking. I know it's not about
Charlie Kirk and we'll get to Charlie
Kirk in a second, but when you when you
u think about what's happening and the
revelations here with Artic Frost, first
it was nine people were targeted,
[clears throat] eight senators, one
congressperson by Jack Smith and Garland
and and others. Now then it became 160.
Today it's 460. This is in a matter of a
week. It's gone from 9 to 460 people
were targeted by Garland, Rey and and
the Biden regime and likely Obama with
this Jack Smith who is a despicable
human being. You look into his record. I
mean what he did in the office of
whatever it is ethics or public
integrity or whatever it was the justice
department was outrageous
>> and think he replaced somebody Holder
got rid of somebody Obama and Holder got
rid of [clears throat] somebody who was
deemed to be too outrageous even for
them and replaced that idiot with with
Jack Smith and then Jack Smith went on a
rampage
you know and he's I mean look you're
innocent till proven guilty in this
country I get it. But um what what has
happened to people like Jerry Corsy, to
you, to others, uh I think back to my
interview with those idiotic FBI agents
in in December 18, uh 2018 just as
Clarissa lay dying. Literally, as you
know, I get a call Clarissa's going to
die shortly. Next call is the FBI wants
to see me.
>> Do you think they knew about that,
Charles? Maybe they're like, "Oh, get
him now while he's emotionally."
>> Maybe, you know, and it's just I mean
this idea and you know, you see it in in
in the Bill Gates. I know I'm going all
over the place here, but you know, Bill
Gates um pontificating about climate
change, spending billions supporting
these climate cooks, uh that causes Mike
Bloomberg to jump on the climate doom
plane, you know, as he's flying his
helicopters and private planes that he
owns around the world to his various
mansions. You know, suddenly Gates says,
you know, at second thought, climate
climate change not a thing, not
something to worry about. Um and you
know people you don't get to do that.
You don't get to spend 20 years, you
know, pounding the table, financing
professors to to, you know, shape a
climate agenda that's, you know, 100%
wrong and is now dooming Europe to
surfom because these climate cooks, oh,
Bill Gates said, "We can go to another
private party and have some Gates,
caviar, and champagne, telling all the
the peasants that they better live in in
15minute cities." So, you know, when you
have this this cult-like thinking, um,
the people who are in the business of
shaping public opinion, they understand
that. And they saw, I believe, first in
in O'Keeffe at Project Veritoss, they
destroyed him. And before that, they
frankly destroyed the heart of Fox News.
They got Roger Als, they got Bill
O'Reilly, they got, you know, a bunch of
the the major talent was was pumped out
of Fox. They neutered Fox, leaving it
where it is today, a neutered, you know,
I I would argue it's barely conservative
at this point. Um, trying to be like the
other legacy networks. Um, and so they
they they neutered O'Keeffe.
Um, and you know, maybe O'Keefe has some
issues. I I you know I have questions
about him but he his project Feritas was
very effective breaking ma you know
massive stories and O'Keefe media group
is continuing in that image. Charlie
Kirk um was a force for for excellence
frankly while he was alive. You know
your your choice of your religion that's
between you and that's your choice. I
have nothing to say about it. If you
want to flaunt your religion, you know,
I wouldn't do that, but you know, people
will do that. Um
those, you know, gold cross makers, they
got to make money. They got to pay
college tuition bills and stuff. But
anyway, um the Charlie Kirk, you know,
by bravely going into these hell holes
that pass for for educational
institutions
and and not getting standing up there
and coulterlike, you know, I like Ann,
but I mean, she she's in the business of
click baiting and and making a spectacle
and saying outrageous things and
publishing books that, you know, push
the push the needle. Kirk, in contrast,
would go on to these campuses and say,
"I want to understand your opinion." you
know, why don't you explain your views
and then I will react. I mean, that that
was a really almost saintly thing to do
to go into the belly of the beast and
hand the microphone over to these blue
air bluehaired maniacs with nose
piercings and tattoos all over the
place. You let them lecture you about
climate change or whatever they want to
talk about and then take their arguments
apart. That's true education and
bravery. And I think he moved the needle
in the 2024 election. Trump won the
youth vote.
>> You know, Charles, I don't disagree with
anything that you're saying, but
something that really has been kind of
on my mind the past couple days now that
we're what, a month and a half after the
murder of Charlie Kirk. He was an
important guy for all the reasons that
you're saying, but he wasn't a senator.
He wasn't a president, a former
president, a presidential candidate. And
there's something happening right now
around the information about his murder
that's maybe unlike anything we've ever
seen before in terms of the coverups,
the social engineering, all the stuff
around it. And a lot of people
>> What I'm saying to Yeah, I hear you.
What I'm saying may even agree with you
here. What I'm saying is if you assume
that the the classified
uh objectives of our federal government
at the highest level have been to manage
public opinion,
right? That that's the national security
interest of the we can't let the public
know the truth. The opposite of
crowdsource the truth, right? Bury the
truth.org.
um you know the program of going after
435 Congress people and 100 senators and
nine Supreme Court justice and you know
you pick the number of state level and
city level people that's easily managed
by an FBI with 35,000 people in it very
easy to manage and it's it's very easy
to to um uh let individual senators and
house people understand just how
vulnerable they are in a looming
election. On the other hand, it's not so
easy to manage all the you know the stu
the students on campi. I mean remember
those students have made a decision not
to become car mechanics, not to become
construction workers or whatever. And
from amongst them you will end up with
the future senators and whatever. And so
to have a mission of controlling public
opinion is I think entirely consistent
with you know what what we imagine the
deep state is. That's why they're so
damn cocky. They know, you know, the the
deep state actually knows every single
published book that's going to come into
the public do domain. They see it before
the public sees it. They know which
books to push and which to suppress.
They have the ability to stop books from
being published. They have the ability
to take an idiotic book written by Bill
Clinton
>> and you know give him 15 15 million and
you know and have every New York Times
book review person to write a you know
gushing book review about you know how
wise and and same thing with Obama. So,
so you know, Charlie Kirk was a threat
to all that and he was young,
right? And if he if he had been allowed
to live a full life, who knows what
would have happened, you know, in some
ways why I'm so passionate about this. I
I have here
um a book by by Luke Callaway who was a
class he became the chief justice of the
Montana Supreme Court and he writes
glowingly about and in fact in that book
is a picture I'd never seen before of my
great-grandfather Austin Carlos Gormley
who was in his law class and he and
Austin sadly died at age 42 of
appendicitis on a fishing expedition
around White Sulphur Springs whereas
in-laws had a bunch of land and other
interests and he died at 42 and you know
it it it just shook Luke Callaway who
lived into his late 80s because he he
felt that Austin was on a path to be a
senator and from there uh you know
possibly be president of the United
States. I think, you know, Kirk might
might have become president of the
United States. And not only that, he
might have had like, you know, you think
about William Jennings Bryan who was
another populist politician,
uh, trustbusting, you know, populist who
ran for president a few times as an
independent and lost, you know, um, he
might have been somebody like William
Jennings Bryant or more more he might
have been president for eight years. he
might have inspired
um you know a whole bunch of followers.
Um, now once again, Charles, sorry to
interject, but I don't disagree with
anything that you're saying, but even
given all that, it still seems like an
unprecedented like just a few hours ago,
we're hearing there's this whole big
deal going on that the FBI is, you know,
Cash Patel opposing Tulsi Gabbard and
that guy, what's his name? Kent,
what's his name? They're trying to take
over the investigation
and uh Cash Patel is saying no.
>> Strongly opposed the proposal to make
the office of the director of national
intelligence the lead counter
intelligence agency for the federal
government. He's he's uh against it. Joe
Kent and um and
>> yeah, Joe Kent is I I interviewed Joe
Kent. is a um he was somebody who ran
for Congress in I think Washington
and lost
um and I think he has some kind of
military background, doesn't he?
>> I think so.
>> Yeah. But um
>> and I've just started hearing about him
recently. He's definitely
>> Well, yeah. Yeah, I mean the whole this
whole idea of national security, I mean
the the oath that fought John Kerry um
had at least one thing right when he
said uh national security is purely and
simply economic security for
individuals. You know if individuals do
not feel that they can make enough money
to save for retirement to to live
comfortably to you know enjoy their
families and grow there is no national
security.
You know, you if you if you set up a
society where, you know, people are are
praised and examples are set, for
example, with Obama, you know, who is
rich today because he's a nuisance,
right? As a as a community organizer.
There's nothing more than a nuisance,
right? I'm going to I'm going to send
people with bullhorns and 1960s typed up
slogans to your house at night unless
you give me what I want. And by the way,
I have a nonprofit over here that, you
know, I'm going to soak for as much
money as I can get,
you know. So,
uh, but on Charlie Kirk, um, what we've
discussed in the LA, and I think we'll
save this for the paid people, but, uh,
what we discussed in our previous
broadcast is that there are major league
questions about the finances and filings
of the various of turning point itself
and the various allied organizations and
the various for-profit entities, which
Charlie and his wife and others seem to
have had. There's legitimate questions
about all that and uh the public
deserves public un you know has a right
to understand what's going on here and I
I the second you open a national
security level or whatever they call it
investigation that gives the
investigators the ability to sweep under
the rug the pesky details that you and I
might want to examine. You know I I
think there should be a proper murder
investigation here.
>> Yeah. You know, it's interesting,
Charles. You and I, when we did that
episode exploring specifically the
nonprofits and everything, we had that
Charlie Kirk email that had been sent to
me by Brian Fence. I didn't realize this
at the time, but Brian has been doing a
lot of research into uh Turning Point
USA. He I maybe it was last night, but I
saw it this morning. Brian appeared on
uh Redacted. He's had me on his Magamine
podcast. He seems a decent guy. I don't
know him that well. We've communicated a
little bit, but we seem to agree on
quite a few things. And he's got really
some very interesting research into
Turning Point USA and specifically this
guy Tyler Ba Boyer, Bowerer, however you
pronounce his name. This guy's been
accused of all kinds of uh I don't want
to misspe but either sexual harassment,
sexual assault, and Brian presented
evidence of quite a lot of coverups.
>> Yeah. I mean, something is wrong. Look,
when you get um when an organization is
t targeting the campai,
right, you've got a lot of of students
with student loans who are, you know,
trying Kirk basically didn't didn't go
to college, right? I mean, he he just
started this organization and it became
a major factor throwing a lot of money
around. You're a college student in debt
and you don't have a job. Um, some of
you are going to do anything you can do
to uh, you know, get into the income
stream. And, you know, there's a lot of
hormones flying around on those campuses
and there's a, you know, a lot of
potential for mayhem and mischief. And
you're talking about young kids,
>> you know, out of the out of the home for
the first time. You know,
>> that's where a lot of this went to, that
they were hiring like hot young college
girls to be in the thing and then
sexually assaulting them and and then
hitting them with lawsuits saying, "Oh,
you signed a non-disclosure agreement,
so don't disclose the sexual assault,
alleged sexual assault."
>> Look, and that happens. I mean, you
know, Washington DC is a cauldron for
that.
>> Yeah.
>> The state state capitals are cauldrons
for all that. It's one of the oldest
stories ever. I mean, Adam and Eve and
all that. I mean it's it's um that you
know the temptations that you you and
don't talk about you know that's before
we bring up the number of you know
salacious scandals invol involving
religious organizations of all
descriptions all religions you know
there sorted tales of of people in
positions of influence taking advantage
of the congregations whatever you want
to call them the flock
>> and just to be clear if I understand
your position on this and certainly this
is my position on it I know we have a
lot of people who are religious. We're
not trying to say that religion does
this. It's that con artists disguise
themselves as religious people to go
into these organizations and do
unscrupulous things. And that's what
some of these allegations were, that
there were people, you know, I haven't
heard people actually accusing Charlie
Kirk of this. But again, you know, today
it was Brian who said that after Charlie
Kirk's death, it seems like this um
audit that was supposed to go into all
this financial impropriy has been, I
guess, cancelled.
>> Well, it can't be cancelled.
>> What do you mean?
>> Right. It has to happen.
>> Well, absolutely has to happen. I mean,
you know, there look, the the not
for-profit world
has been I mean, when when I you know,
back in 2015
when I wrote that story for Breitbart
about the Clinton Foundation and then
Peter not knowing that Peter Schweitzer
had his book coming out two months later
or a month later, um it was it was out
there for me to to level the type of
accusations I was leveling. were
dumbfounded that a presidential charity
would be this poorly run and this boldly
fraudulent. But now I think you know
after doing this for 10 years or 11
years now I guess um I think it's become
more an accepted principle that you know
most charities have very bad elements
associated with them and big ones
particular any big charity that's
involved in international operations
should belongs under the microscope any
any big charity with chapters like
turning point belongs under the
microscope because chapter Chapters are
tough. I mean, who's to say how much
money actually goes towards the chapter?
Who's to say how the chapter spends that
money? You know, is a beer blast a
legitimate charity operation? You know,
should you be taking money in from
gullible people at the door in cash?
You know, you know, is it clear that
that at the end of a party that all the
food and alcohol that you bought for the
party, what do you do with it? Do you
throw it out? You hand it out to your
friends? How do you account for all
that? And so [clears throat]
you're talking about college kids.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, who need who need spending
money?
>> A lot that can go wrong. Charles, we're
we're close to the end of our segment
here, but we're going to continue and go
on a deep dive into the financial
documents and all the stuff that people
love to see you do on the sponsor
exclusive segment in the first amendment
forum. People can join us for that on
crowdsource thetruth. substack.com or on
subscribestar.com
or patreon.com/crowdsource.
Also, people who follow me on xjg_cst
and subscribe there are going to get
access to the sponsor exclusive content.
I also wanted to let you know, Charles,
you know, this evidence bounty that I've
been running, the purpose of which is to
invite any expert in any field, not to
come at me with some cockami idea, but
to present countermanding evidence and a
counter thesis that would disprove the
evidence that I've laid out that causes
me to say that Charlie Kirk was shot
from behind by a projectile traveling at
500 ft per second. A lot of people have
just decided they don't like this and
it's debunked and they cite a lot of
other invalid evidence. But there's been
a recent surge in people who believe
that I'm correct. And to show their
support for Crowdsource the truth, those
viewers have gone to crowdsource the
truth.org. They've boosted this bounty
to $4,314.
And there's still just about a week
left, few days until November 4th. If
experts in any field feel like they can
disprove what I've said about this, they
could retrieve this bounty. Likewise,
people who want to add to the bounty can
go onto the website there and using
either cryptocurrency or their credit
cards, they can add to the bounty uh any
amount that they choose. Again, the one
thing that I remind the people who want
to challenge the bounty of is that you
can't just say, "Oh, I have some other
idiotic theory, you really are going to
need to understand, first of all, what
it is that I'm saying that a 400 uh
sorry, a 240 hertz mode of the iPhone
was used to record that video and it's
240
subframe per second sampling that
resulted in that imagery. I go into the
details in this article citing the
iPhone initial release of Dolby Vision
HDR and the Dolby patent. So, you know,
people who think that I've made this up
or have defamed me by saying I'm
misleading people obviously haven't read
this, but that's not going to be the
focus of what we talk about in the next
segment. Charles has a lot to discuss
about the abuse of charities. We're
going to look at the 990s for Turning
Point and a couple of other things. So,
please join us over there in the First
Amendment Forum. We'll be right back.
And thanks to everybody who's been
supporting the show by whatever method
you choose. Stay with us.