2,279 videos 1,365,173,983 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Challenges Kamala Harris Voter on Economy, Border, and What She's Actually Done to Earn the Presidency
Charlie Kirk engages in a detailed debate with a Kamala Harris supporter at a Turning Point USA event in battleground Wisconsin. The conversation covers the stark differences between the Trump and Biden-Harris administrations on the economy, border security, and foreign policy. Kirk presses the voter to explain what Harris has accomplished as Vice President and why she deserves promotion to the presidency. The exchange reveals the challenge many Harris supporters face when pressed beyond surface-level talking points about abortion and vibes. Kirk highlights that under Trump, Americans needed $75,000 annually to buy a home compared to $120,000 under Biden-Harris, border crossings hit all-time lows, and no new wars started. The voter struggles to articulate concrete achievements by Harris beyond her stance on abortion rights.
Charlie Kirk begins the conversation by challenging the voter's support for Kamala Harris based on the child tax credit and Trump's tax cuts. When the voter suggests Harris would manage the economy well, Kirk immediately questions why she hasn't done so in the three and a half years she's been Vice President.
Kirk rejects the notion that the Vice President manages the economy, pointing out that if Harris wanted to run the country, she could have. He then pivots to her actual assigned responsibility: the border.
The Border Crisis Under Harris
Kirk confronts the voter about Harris's performance managing the border, asking how many illegal immigrants have entered under her watch. When the voter admits he doesn't know the number, Kirk provides it: 10 million people, more than the entire population of New Jersey.
Kirk asks directly: "Why does she deserve to be president when she can't even manage the Border?" When the voter tries to reference a Biden-Harris border bill, Kirk cuts through the excuse, explaining that border policy can be implemented through executive order, pointing to the "Remain in Mexico" policy as an example.
Kirk emphasizes that Harris decided to empower what he calls a "foreign invasion" rather than secure the border, demonstrating a clear failure in her primary responsibility as Vice President.
Foreign Policy Failures and the Inflation Crisis
Beyond the border, Kirk points to Harris's failed diplomatic mission regarding the Russia-Ukraine dispute. She went to the Munich Security Conference, and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians subsequently died in the war that followed.
Kirk also highlights that Harris cast the deciding vote on what he calls "the inflation explosion act," which has caused everyone to pay more for goods and services. He presses the voter: "Her first day was three and a half years ago as VP. What has she done that has given you confidence she'll do a good job as president?"
The Housing Affordability Crisis
The voter claims Harris inherited a bad COVID economy that has gotten better. Kirk strongly disputes this, pointing to concrete numbers that paint a very different picture. He explains that 1.5 million people lost their jobs in the last year, and 75% of Americans disapprove of the current economy.
The most striking statistic Kirk presents concerns housing affordability. Under Trump's presidency, Americans required $75,000 per year in income to buy a home. Under Biden-Harris, that requirement has skyrocketed to $120,000 per year—a $50,000 increase that puts homeownership out of reach for millions of young Americans.
Kirk asks the young voters to consider their own futures: "If you guys want to buy a home in your life," they need to understand these numbers. When the voter tries to suggest these were just the numbers on the last day of Trump's presidency during COVID, Kirk confirms that even during the height of the pandemic, the requirement was $75,000—still far better than the current situation.
The Trump Record Versus Harris
Kirk lays out what he sees as Trump's objective achievements:
Border crossings at all-time lows
No new wars started
Economic prosperity with lower costs for homes and goods
Gas at $2 per gallon
Greater international respect and stability
When the voter tries to claim Trump continued the war in Afghanistan, Kirk clarifies that Trump was winding down operations and didn't execute the disastrous withdrawal that occurred under Biden-Harris.
Kirk frames the comparison starkly: "Trump was President for four years. People were richer, world was safer, border was secure, things were going really really well." He then challenges the voter to make the case for Harris beyond "vibes and brat summer."
Who Is Kamala Harris?
One of Kirk's most pointed critiques concerns Harris's legitimacy and transparency. He notes that she won't take questions from the press, didn't receive a single vote in a Democratic primary, and was essentially installed through "some sort of Zoom conference vote."
Kirk expresses genuine bewilderment: "Who is this person? How did she get here?" The voter can only respond that she was the Vice President and Biden dropped out, so she was on the ticket. This lack of a compelling answer underscores Kirk's point about the weakness of Harris's candidacy.
When Kirk points out he's been at the event for three hours while Harris "will not take 5 minutes of questions," he asks if this bothers the voter for someone seeking the presidency. The voter admits he hasn't watched her with the press much, prompting Kirk to note that's because "she doesn't talk to the Press."
The Abortion Issue as the Primary Argument
When pressed repeatedly to make a positive case for Harris, the voter ultimately falls back on abortion as "a big one." Kirk acknowledges they'll disagree but asks if that's truly the most important civilizational issue.
The conversation reveals an interesting dynamic around Wisconsin politics. The voter claims Wisconsin is "extremely gerrymandered" with most statewide elected officials being Democrats while the legislature is Republican. He argues this isn't reflective of what the state wants and that they're defaulting to an 1849 abortion law.
Kirk points out that abortion is actually on the ballot as a referendum in Wisconsin, meaning the people will decide directly. He questions how Trump would even interfere with the voter's abortion plans when the issue has been left to the states. The voter suggests Trump's appointment of pro-life judges to circuit courts is the main concern.
Kirk summarizes: "So the case for Kamala is that Donald Trump might appoint circuit court judges." While acknowledging that judicial appointments are important, Kirk expresses amazement at the thinness of the overall case for Harris.
What Would It Take to Change Minds?
Kirk asks a revealing final question: Is there anything Harris could do that would make the voter not vote for her? The voter says yes—if she reversed a lot of her positions from the Democratic Party.
Kirk immediately points out the irony: Harris has already reversed her positions. She now says she's for fracking when she was against it. She claims to oppose the electric vehicle mandate when she previously supported it. The voter clarifies he's talking about issues he cares about more than fracking—specifically abortion and gun control.
This leads to Kirk's concluding statement, where he contrasts priorities: "I think preventing World War III and making sure Americans can own homes and having a robust economy, not being invaded, it's far more important than the ability to murder unborn children, but we'll agree to disagree."
The Bigger Picture
This exchange in battleground Wisconsin encapsulates a broader challenge facing the Harris campaign. When voters are pressed beyond emotional appeals and single issues, they struggle to articulate what Harris has actually accomplished or why she deserves promotion to the highest office.
Kirk's methodology throughout the conversation is to demand specifics: specific numbers on the border, specific income requirements for homeownership, specific achievements that demonstrate competence. The voter's responses reveal a reliance on talking points that don't hold up under scrutiny—claiming the economy has improved when by every metric that affects ordinary Americans it has worsened, or referencing a border bill when executive action was always available.
The conversation also highlights a generational concern. Young Americans who want to buy homes, start families, and build stable lives face unprecedented economic barriers under the current administration. The $50,000 increase in required income to purchase a home represents a massive shift in the American Dream's accessibility in just a few years.
Kirk's final framing presents voters with a clear choice about priorities: world peace, economic prosperity, national security, and the ability to afford basic middle-class milestones versus single-issue voting on abortion. Whether voters agree with his framing or not, the challenge he presents to Harris supporters remains: What has she actually done to earn the presidency?
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.