Charlie Kirk Defends Christian Support for Trump Against John Piper's Biblical Objections

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Debates Medical Student on Abortion, Conception, and When Human Life Begins

Charlie Kirk Debates Medical Student on Abortion, Conception, and When Human Life Begins

8:33

Charlie Kirk Defends Supporting Trump as Christian: Why Biblical Standards Matter More Than Personal Morality

Charlie Kirk Defends Supporting Trump as Christian: Why Biblical Standards Matter More Than Personal Morality

8:16

Charlie Kirk Confronts UT Austin Students on America's Greatness, Lockdowns, and Abortion Rights in Live Debate

Charlie Kirk Confronts UT Austin Students on America's Greatness, Lockdowns, and Abortion Rights in Live Debate

1:37:59

Charlie Kirk banner
2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018

Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.

Charlie Kirk Defends Christian Support for Trump Against John Piper's Biblical Objections

Charlie Kirk addresses a challenging question about his stance that Christians cannot vote Democrat, engaging with criticisms from prominent evangelical theologian John Piper. The questioner, who drove 90 minutes to attend, references Piper's 2020 article arguing against supporting Trump due to unrepentant sin. Kirk responds by defending Trump as a flawed but effective vessel, comparing him to biblical figures like Samson and King Cyrus, while challenging Piper and other evangelical leaders like Russell Moore, David French, and Timothy Keller to explain how they can remain neutral when abortion and the protection of children hang in the balance.

Categories: Debates
August 6, 2024

The Setup: A Respectful Challenge

A questioner who identifies as largely agreeing with Charlie Kirk on conservative values poses a thoughtful challenge. Having traveled an hour and a half with his wife, leaving two kids behind, he wanted to press Kirk on a bold statement: that you cannot be a true born-again Christian and vote Democrat. Kirk reaffirms his position immediately.

The questioner then brings up John Piper, the well-known evangelical theologian behind Desiring God, and his November 2020 article that argued Christians should vote for neither Trump nor Biden. Piper's argument centered on the idea that a leader's character and unrepentant sin matter just as much as their policies.

John Piper's Position Explained

According to the questioner, Piper acknowledged that policies endorsing abortion, gender transition procedures, and socialist overreach are deadly and evil. However, Piper remained baffled that many Christians consider the sins of unrepentant sexual immorality, boastfulness, vulgarity, and the like to be less toxic to the nation. Piper wrote that it is a drastic mistake to think that the deadly influences of a leader come only through his policies and not also through his person.

The questioner asks Kirk how he can delegitimize the faith of a sincere, Bible-believing, prayerful Christian who determines that a man engaging in blatant and unrepentant sin should not lead the country.

Kirk's Biblical Defense: Samson and Cyrus

Kirk immediately clarifies that his statement applies to those who actually vote for the Democrat Party platform, not to Piper specifically, since Piper never explicitly said he voted for Biden. Kirk's position is simple: if you are a born-again Christian, by the fruit you will know them. If the fruit is casting a ballot for a party whose leaders spent more time on Easter Sunday talking about trans rights than the resurrection of Jesus Christ, you cannot claim to follow biblical principles.

Kirk then turns to scripture to counter Piper's argument. He invokes Samson from the Book of Judges, who is listed in the Hall of Faith in Hebrews despite being deeply flawed. Samson visited prostitutes, killed 400 Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey, and was far from a model of righteousness. Yet God used him for His purposes. Kirk also mentions King Cyrus, whom God used to bring the Israelites back from exile and rebuild the second temple, despite not being a believer himself.

The point, Kirk argues, is that God uses broken, sinful vessels for His purposes. Christians supporting Trump are not blind to his faults—they can recite them just as they can recite their own. But they also recognize his virtues.

Trump's Virtues Often Ignored

Kirk points out that critics like Piper never acknowledge Trump's virtues. He highlights Trump's courage, asking whether anyone else would continue fighting while facing 700 years in federal prison and having their family business empire threatened. He also praises Trump's love of country as unparalleled and unprecedented.

Kirk accuses Piper of conflating policy with personality. While Piper argues that a president's influence comes from both, Kirk insists that policy is far more important. He illustrates this by suggesting that if you turn off the TV and tune out media, you will still be impacted by the president—through his policies.

The Fruit of the First Trump Administration

Kirk challenges Piper to acknowledge what Trump actually delivered: three Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, the U.S. embassy moved to Jerusalem, and peace agreements in the Middle East. If Christians had followed Piper's advice in 2016, Hillary Clinton would have been president, and none of those things would have happened. Kirk argues that Trump's presidency proved that a flawed man can deliver excellent policy and fulfill his promises.

The Challenge to John Piper and Other Evangelical Leaders

Kirk turns the tables, expressing his own bafflement at Piper and other evangelical leaders like Andy Stanley, Russell Moore, David French, Rick Warren, Timothy Keller, and David Platt. How can they remain indifferent to a million abortions per year, 100,000 kids on hormone blockers, a wide-open border, the destruction of Western society, race hatred, defunding the police, rising crime, and the downfall of Minneapolis—Piper's own hometown—while preaching about Donald Trump's personality?

Kirk declares that it is on John Piper to explain himself, not on Christians who voted to end abortion. He states flatly: if you will not vote to end abortion, stop telling me you're a Christian all the time and start acting and voting like you are a Christian.

The Questioner Pushes Back

The questioner responds that leaders like Piper are not saying Christians should have unconditional support for an individual simply because of his party. They are arguing that character matters and that unrepentant sin should not be ignored.

Kirk counters that Christians are not giving unconditional support to an individual—they are giving unconditional support to biblical principles that a flawed vessel fought for and achieved. He challenges Russell Moore, David French, and others to reconcile their positions when they stand before Jesus Christ. How will they explain that they spent their time writing lengthy op-eds in The New York Times criticizing Donald Trump's tone when they were given a binary choice between babies saved and babies murdered?

The Binary Choice

The questioner continues to press, arguing that Piper did not mention tone but unrepentant sin in five categories explicitly mentioned in the New Testament. Kirk responds by invoking Samson again, saying he would not have advocated for Samson as a leader if he were an Israelite in the Old Testament. But God thought Samson was worthy to be in the Hall of Faith—and that's what matters.

The questioner agrees that Christians should vote for Trump but insists the conversation should not end there. He argues it is a biblical principle that a leader's character impacts the nation, not just their policies. Kirk asks if the questioner has ever met Donald Trump, to which he says no. Kirk suggests that without meeting someone, you do not truly know who they are.

Jesus and the Stone

The questioner closes by asking whether Jesus of Nazareth would agree with Kirk's statement that no born-again Christian can vote Democrat. Kirk responds that Jesus would have handled Trump like He did the woman caught in adultery in John 8. He would have said, do not cast a stone against Donald Trump—Trump, sin no more. But He also would have said the same to Charlie Kirk: do not throw a stone at Charlie Kirk—Charlie, sin no more.

We all fall short of the glory of God, Kirk concludes, and God uses all of us as broken vessels for His purposes.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!