2,429 videos 1,392,106,835 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk was the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, which he built into the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country, with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. He was also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which set out to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reached over 100 million people per month and, according to Axios, he was one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He hosted "The Charlie Kirk Show," which regularly ranked among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts. He was assassinated at Utah Valley University on 10 September 2025.
Charlie Kirk Dismantles Critical Race Theory Advocate Who Forgot What He Learned in College
Charlie Kirk engaged a college student in a tense debate about critical race theory, exposing contradictions in the student's arguments. When the student admitted he couldn't remember reading Derrick Bell's foundational text despite taking a college course on it, Kirk seized the opportunity to question the value proposition of modern higher education. The exchange showcased Kirk's ability to define critical race theory's core tenets while dismantling the ideology's premise that race should dominate American discourse.
The exchange began when a college student challenged Charlie Kirk to define critical race theory. Kirk immediately pointed to Derrick Bell's 1991 book "Introduction to Critical Race Theory" as the foundational text. But Kirk also offered his own contemporary definition: "Call everything racist till you control it."
The student pushed back, suggesting this definition was too broad and could mean "basically anything." Kirk acknowledged this was his definition "in the modern American context," while noting the academic roots trace back to theorists like Herbert Marcuse, Jacques Derrida, and Michel Foucault. However, he maintained that Derrick Bell's 1991 work remains "the most agreed upon academic theory" on the subject.
The Forgotten Education
In a striking moment, the student admitted: "Well yeah I read the book but I don't remember anything about it. It was for like a college class. Like let's be honest nobody remembers the books they read in college."
Kirk pounced on this admission, questioning the value of higher education when students don't retain what they're taught. "Sounds like a great value proposition to go to college," Kirk remarked sarcastically. The student defended college education despite the irony that he couldn't recall the very book central to their debate.
The exchange became even more pointed when the student revealed he attended on scholarship. Kirk highlighted the absurdity: "So somebody else paid for you to not remember the book that you were supposed to read. Some wealthy donor or taxpayer paid for you to not remember the book."
Five Pillars of Critical Race Theory
Kirk then provided a detailed breakdown of critical race theory's core beliefs, based on Derrick Bell's work:
The notion that racism is ordinary and everywhere
The idea of interest convergence, otherwise known as intersectionality
The social construction of race, meaning there is a social construction around race in our society
The idea of storytelling and counter-storytelling
No matter how hard you work or what you do, you cannot remove racism from your society
The student acknowledged these points rang a bell but struggled to engage with them substantively, asking Kirk to repeat the third point because his "mind is dying."
The Social Construction of Race
When Kirk asked whether the student thought race was "at least partially socially constructed," the conversation revealed common ground. The student responded that it "depends how you define it" and noted that "what defines where one race ends and where one race begins depends who you're asking."
Kirk's response was unequivocal: "I think race is completely and totally irrelevant." When the student agreed, Kirk turned the tables: "Then why are we talking about race all the time and why are we talking about critical race theory?"
The student attempted to shift responsibility back to Kirk, claiming Kirk brought up race first during his speech. Kirk corrected this characterization, emphasizing he had called critical race theory "a lie from the pit of hell that we should repudiate and stop talking about all the time."
Grassroots Support and Mission
During the exchange, the student questioned Kirk about his wealthy donors in what appeared to be an attempt to undermine his credibility. Kirk turned this into an opportunity to thank supporters in the audience and clarify Turning Point USA's funding model.
Kirk stated that Turning Point USA has "over 130,000 grassroots donors" with many people contributing small amounts like five, ten, or fifteen dollars. He described the organization as "a grassroots funded operation," thanking individual supporters throughout the room.
The Core Message: Character Over Color
Kirk concluded the exchange by reiterating his fundamental position on race. He drew a clear distinction between discussing critical race theory as an ideology and discussing race itself. "Critical race theory, not race," he emphasized when the student accused him of constantly bringing up race.
Kirk described critical race theory as "a mind virus pathogen destroying America" that he opposes precisely because it makes race central to everything. His closing statement encapsulated his philosophy: "Race means nothing. I care about your actions, your character, and most importantly your soul."
The exchange demonstrated Kirk's debating approach: allowing opponents to speak, identifying weaknesses in their arguments, providing specific evidence and frameworks, and returning to core principles. The student's admission that he couldn't remember the foundational text of the very theory he was defending became the defining moment of the exchange, illustrating Kirk's broader critique of modern higher education and ideological indoctrination.
