2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Explains Trump's Tariff Strategy and the Madman Theory in International Relations
Charlie Kirk engages with a political science student studying international relations to discuss Trump's tariff strategy and its impact on global trade. Kirk argues that Trump's approach, imposing high tariffs, then negotiating deals, forces countries like Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam to the negotiating table. He explains Trump's use of the "madman theory" from political science, where unpredictability becomes leverage. Kirk advocates for a 10% baseline tariff while acknowledging the risks, and outlines three key negotiating goals: getting countries to buy more American liquid natural gas, agricultural products, and prioritizing the U.S. over China for technology transfers. The conversation explores whether this volatility damages America's credibility or strengthens its negotiating position.
During a campus dialogue, Charlie Kirk fielded questions from a political science student concerned about whether Trump's approach to tariffs—imposing them, pulling them back, then reimposing them—would damage America's credibility on the world stage. Kirk addressed these concerns head-on, arguing that the opposite effect is actually occurring.
According to Kirk, countries like Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam are currently coming to the United States to negotiate better trade deals directly with Trump. He described Trump's strategy as intentionally provocative: announce outrageously high tariffs, watch the market reaction, and use that pressure to force trading partners to the negotiating table in a way that wouldn't otherwise happen.
The 90-Day Delay and China Exception
Kirk explained that Trump implemented a 90-day delay for tariffs on most countries—except China. He emphasized that China should not be exempted because they remain the number one focus of American trade policy attention. This delay period allows countries to come to the table and negotiate improved trade arrangements.
Three Key Negotiating Goals
Kirk outlined three specific things Trump seeks through these negotiations:
Countries need to buy more American liquid natural gas and energy products, which the U.S. has in abundance and which would create significant jobs
They need to purchase more American beef and agricultural products
The U.S. needs to become their primary source for technology transfers, replacing China in that role
These three objectives form the core of what Kirk considers a "better deal" for America, even if the country doesn't achieve complete trade parity.
The Madman Theory Explained
When pressed on the apparent volatility and lack of transparency in Trump's tariff policy, Kirk invoked a concept from classical political science: the madman theory. He explained that Trump represents perhaps the best modern example of this proven methodology, where unpredictability itself becomes a strategic asset.
The madman theory operates on the principle that when your opponents don't know which way you're going to go—up or down—you can actually negotiate much better deals. Kirk acknowledged that people can criticize Trump for this approach, but noted that it's studied in political science as a legitimate and effective strategy.
Tariffs as Leverage vs. Long-Term Policy
Kirk distinguished between different uses of tariffs. Traditionally, tariffs served two purposes: protecting domestic industry and serving national security interests. Trump has introduced a third purpose: using tariffs as leverage to bring trading partners to the negotiating table.
When asked about the contradiction between supporting tariffs as long-term economic policy versus using them as temporary leverage, Kirk clarified his position. He supports a 10% baseline tariff as reasonable and fair, which serves as a "forcing function" to incentivize certain behaviors. However, when tariffs reach 30%, 40%, or 50%—arbitrary, very high numbers—he believes they begin to disincentivize reciprocal trade.
Manufacturing Incentives
Kirk provided a simple example of how the tariff strategy works in practice. If you're Toyota, how do you avoid a tariff? Make it in America. The goal is to create incentives for foreign companies to manufacture their products in the United States rather than importing them.
Acknowledging the Risks
Kirk was candid about the uncertainty surrounding tariffs. He stated clearly that tariffs are very risky and acknowledged that we don't fully know how this strategy will work out. However, he pointed out that the American people voted for this approach.
When the student distinguished between market volatility and actual economic impact, Kirk agreed with the correction, noting that while the market experienced turbulence, the economy itself would face serious problems if the bond market collapsed. He acknowledged concerns about China's holdings of U.S. bonds as a legitimate issue.
Finding Common Ground
The exchange demonstrated the kind of civil political dialogue Kirk encourages. The student opened by acknowledging they probably don't agree with Kirk on much but appreciated his willingness to encourage dialogue in a divided country. Kirk engaged respectfully with each question, providing detailed explanations while maintaining humility about the ultimate outcomes of the policies being discussed.
Throughout the conversation, Kirk emphasized that while he supports a moderate baseline tariff and believes Trump's strategy has merit, he approaches the topic with appropriate humility given the complexity and risks involved in restructuring international trade relationships.
