Up Next
Charlie Kirk Sits Down with Bill Maher on Club Random: Discussing Faith, Politics, and Cultural Battles
1:10:43
Charlie Kirk Asks College Student: If You Believe in the Big Bang, Don't You Believe in God?
3:19
Charlie Kirk Declares Faith Courage and Freedom Essential at California Church Gathering with Pastor Bart Pierce
1:29:22
Charlie Kirk Reflects on Faith, Courage, and Defending Biblical Truth in Public Life
Charlie Kirk shares what matters most to him: being remembered for his courage and faith in Christ. In candid exchanges, he defends the biblical foundation of Western civilization, explains why he believes the resurrection is true, and challenges modern misconceptions about religion, morality, and the Ten Commandments. From debating evolution and the reliability of Scripture to explaining why the Founding Fathers were not deists, Kirk makes the case that America's best hope lies in returning to its Christian roots. He also reflects on his transformative experience visiting Israel, where the Bible came alive and strengthened his conviction that the Scriptures are not fairy tales, but the word of God.
How Charlie Kirk Wants to Be Remembered
If everything completely goes away, how do you want to be remembered? Charlie Kirk's answer is simple and profound: courage and faith. "I want to be remembered for my faith," he says. "That would be the most important thing. Most important thing is my faith in my life."
In this tribute, Kirk honors the life of a man whose life was stolen in an act of hatred, but who was also a husband, a father, and a brother in Christ. Through some of Kirk's favorite public moments, he defends the truth and glorifies God, offering a window into what drives his mission.
The Ten Commandments and the Foundation of the West
When asked about the separation of morality and state, Kirk doesn't hesitate: "Of course not." He argues that the morality that built the West is rooted in the Ten Commandments, which he describes as "the best rules of life for any society to flourish and to be able to succeed."
Kirk recites the commandments: You shall have no other gods before me. You shall have no other idols. You shall not take the Lord's name in vain. Honor your mother and father. Honor the Sabbath day and keep it holy. Do not murder. Do not steal. Do not bear false witness. Do not covet. Do not commit adultery.
"Those rules for life is what the founders believed so much so that they're in the halls of Congress and the Supreme Court," Kirk explains. "We believe it is transcendently transmitted to us, and when we do not submit to those Ten Commandments, our country starts to fall apart."
Debunking the Myth That Religion Causes War
When challenged with the claim that religion entangled in government causes most wars, Kirk quickly dismantles the argument with historical facts.
"What religion did Mao Zedong believe in?" he asks. "He was an atheist. What religion did Joseph Stalin believe in who killed over 30 million people of the Soviet Union? He was an atheist. So that's 80 million people murdered in two countries in just the 20th century that did not believe in any religion."
Kirk continues: "It's an easy talking point to say that religion causes war, but in reality, it seems as if totalitarian dictatorships rooted in atheism and a lack of the divine is what caused more human suffering in the 20th century than not."
He also addresses Adolf Hitler, clarifying: "Adolf Hitler was not a Christian. Adolf Hitler was at war with God and thought he was God and a total maniac."
Why Kirk Believes the Bible Is True
When asked why he believes the Bible is real, Kirk offers multiple reasons:
- There's never been an archaeological discovery that has contradicted the truth of the Bible
- There is not a truth of the Bible that if you apply to your life, your life does not improve dramatically
- We have the most accurate and transparent historically robust account of the most important figure ever to live: Jesus of Nazareth
"The resurrection is the pinpoint of my belief that Jesus did rise from the grave so that we may live," Kirk says. "If Genesis 1:1 and the resurrection is true, anything in the Bible is possible."
Evidence for the Resurrection
Kirk explains why he believes Jesus rose from the dead: "Show me another historical piece of a story where so many people willingly died a brutal death for a lie. Every single person around him had everything to lose and yet they went to the absolute death from Paul to Peter to the half-brother of James saying that Jesus is Lord."
He points to additional evidence: "If you were going to fake a story, you would not use female witnesses in the ancient world. In the scriptures, it said that the women were the first one to see Jesus Christ. If you're trying to fake a story, you would never do that. Not to mention the 500 people that saw Jesus after he rose from the dead."
Kirk's Views on Creation and Evolution
When questioned about evolution, Kirk navigates the issue carefully. "I believe the scriptures to be true. And I also acknowledge that there is an abundance of scientific research that shows adaptation. Species change is heavily inferred in the data. I don't know enough about it, but I believe the scriptures to be true."
He explains that believers can hold different views on this topic: "Very smart Christians are on both sides of this issue. There's what we call in Christianity closed-hand theological issues and open-hand theological issues. Closed hand issues would be like the resurrection of Christ, the trinity, and then there's open-handed which would be like eschatology or the eucharist or the creation account."
What Kirk firmly believes is that humans are distinct from animals because they are made in the image of God. "The scriptures say that God created humans male and female distinct. They are the only ones in Genesis 1:26-27 made in the image of God. He called animals good, but they are not image bearers."
The Importance of Communicating Christ
Kirk acknowledges the challenges of communicating faith in the public square: "It's very hard to communicate Christ and then also to challenge people to think, okay, what are the ramifications of your belief in Christ, especially politically, especially culturally. That gets real hard."
He emphasizes the importance of respectful dialogue: "Tolerance is not an atheist and I agree. No, we don't agree. Tolerance is although you are an atheist, I respect you and we're going to have an intelligent dialogue. That's what a liberal arts education is all about. A free exchange of ideas where we don't necessarily agree, but we communicate respectfully and we explain why we believe what we believe."
The Myth of the Deist Founding Fathers
Kirk strongly challenges the narrative that America's Founding Fathers were not Christians: "It is one of the most sinister, most unsubstantiated lies that does not come up against any sort of academic scrutiny. This idea that founding fathers were a bunch of enlightenment common law deists."
He offers compelling evidence: "If the founding fathers were not Bible believing church Christians, why did they put Leviticus on Liberty Bell? Not John, not Psalms, not Proverbs, not Genesis. Leviticus. Leviticus 25:10. Proclaim liberty throughout the land of which you are in."
Kirk believes this lie is told for a specific reason: "If we actually go back to our Christian roots and we go back to where we once were, it's America's best hope for revival and for a great future."
How Israel Changed Kirk's Faith
Kirk shares how visiting Israel transformed his understanding of Scripture: "When I went to Israel, I came in contact with the living God that walked on water and rose Lazarus from the dead. When I went to Israel, I saw the Bible come to life. When I went to Israel, I saw Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah."
He continues: "What I read as Bible stories popped open and I said, 'This is the word of God. This is real. These are not fairy tales or fables or things that we tell our kids.' When I went to Israel, I was able to cry where Jesus cried. Where he was betrayed by Judas and arrested, where he rose from the dead and gives us eternal life."
Kirk is unapologetic about his support for Israel: "There is a diabolical satanic agenda every single day to try and delegitimize the scriptures. I will defend the Holy Land, the place that let me see where my Lord and Savior lived. And I will not apologize to that."
Multiple Authors Prove the Bible's Truth
When challenged about the Bible having multiple authors, Kirk turns it into evidence for Scripture's reliability: "If there was only one person that wrote it, then it might have been just kind of one person's opinion. Instead, you have Solomon who wrote Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, King David who wrote Psalms, and then you have Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and then you have Paul who wrote 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans, and 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and Jude."
He explains: "It kind of proves the point that all these people weren't all working together. Yet 66 different books all came to the same conclusion that there is a God. We are not him. We're in constant rebellion against that God. That God loves us so much because God is love. That he sent his son on a rescue mission to save us from our broken nature so that we can live forever."
Why Different Gospel Accounts Strengthen the Bible
Kirk addresses apparent contradictions in the Gospel accounts of Jesus' birth by using a courtroom analogy: "If right now, god forbid, there was a big car accident and there were five witnesses, someone would say, 'Well, I think he was wearing a yellow shirt.' And someone would say, 'Well, I think it was like a yellowish red shirt.'"
He explains: "The fact gatherer will see a pattern between that because even when you have a lot of eyewitnesses, not everyone's eyewitness will be exactly the same, but everyone will agree, oh, there was a car accident. They weren't disagreeing that there was a virgin birth or that it happened in Bethlehem, but some of their details might have been inconsistent, which actually proves the Bible is true."
Why We Must Know Our Sin to Come to Christ
In a discussion with a Catholic student who doesn't believe in evangelization, Kirk makes a pointed argument: "The only way we bring people to Christ is if they know how much they fall short of the glory of God. They only know they fall short of the glory of God if they know God's perfect standard and law, which we know throughout the scriptures."
He challenges the notion that we don't violate the Ten Commandments: "You might say, 'Oh, I don't violate them.' You're violating do not covet every day. You're violating do not steal every day. You're violating that stuff every single day. And that's why we need a savior."
Kirk contrasts modern self-focus with the Christian message: "On college campus, all about me, all about me. It's meology. When in reality we need Christ to come into our life. We need to repent. We need to get down on our hands and knees and say, 'Jesus, come into my life.'"
The Priority of Jesus and Religious Freedom
Kirk summarizes what matters most: "The most important thing is always Jesus. The second most important thing is making sure that we could talk about Jesus and worship Jesus, which is increasingly more difficult."
He concludes by reiterating a core principle: "Do you believe in separation of morality and state? Nobody does. All laws are a reflection of morality and all morality comes from somewhere. There is no such thing as neutral morality. And we believe what the founders believe because they put it in the halls of Congress. They put it in the Supreme Court and they put it all throughout the country which is that the decalogue, the Ten Commandments, is the core morality of how a society and a civilization should exist."
Video Transcript
If everything completely goes away, how
do you want to be remembered? I
mean, if I die,
everything just goes away. How would you
If you could be associated with one
thing, how would you want to be
remembered?
I want to be I want to be remembered for
for courage for my faith. That that
would be the most important thing. Most
important thing is my faith in my life.
Whether we agree with all of his
positions or not, he was also a husband,
a father, a human being whose life was
stolen in the act of hatred. And I
believe also a brother in Christ. So, in
this video, I want to honor some of my
favorite moments from his public career
where he defended the truth and
glorified God. Do I believe in a
separation of morality and state? Of
course not. Now, the morality that built
the West is the Ten Commandments. The
Ten Commandments is the best rules of
life for any society to flourish and to
be able to succeed. You shall have no
other gods before me. You shall have no
other idols. You shall not take the
Lord's name in vain. Honor your mother
and fathers, may live long in the land
of which you are in. Honor the Sabbath
day and keep it holy. Do not murder. Do
not steal. do not, you know, bear false
witness, do not covet, do not commit
adultery. It was out of order, but is
that still the ten commandments that
those rules for life is what the
founders believed so much so that
they're in the halls of Congress and the
Supreme Court that we believe is
transcendently transmitted to us and
that when we do not submit to those ten
commandments, our country starts to fall
apart.
But if you think about it, most wars in
um when religion gets entangled into a
culture and even government, most wars
have started because of that. So that's
a talking point that has no basis and
that's okay because a professor told you
that. So let's go to the truth and I'm
going to ask you a couple questions.
What religion did Ma Tong believe in?
The great murder of China who killed 50
million people.
I don't know.
He was an atheist. What religion did
Joseph Stalin believe in who killed over
30 million people of the Soviet Union?
An atheist.
He was an atheist. So that's 80 million
people murdered in two countries in just
the 20th century that did not believe in
any religion. So, it's an easy talking
point to say that religion causes war,
but in reality, it seems as if actually
totalitarian dictatorships rooted in
atheism and a lack of the divine is what
caused more human suffering in the 20th
century than not. Adolf Hitler was not a
Christian. Adolf Hitler was at war with
God and thought he was God and a a total
maniac. So, there is no basis for what
you're saying. You might be thinking
about like the Crusades or something
like six or 700 years ago or the
Inquisition. If that's the po, if that's
the case, I think you need a better
argument.
Are you a Christian by any chance?
Very, very much so.
Like, why is that exactly?
Oh, Jesus saved my life. I'm a sinner.
Gave my life to Christ. Most important
decision I ever made.
So, you believe the Bible is real.
Yes, I believe the Bible is true and
real.
Why is that?
Well, I could give you the technical
answer. There's never been an
archaeological discovery that has
contradicted the truth of the Bible. And
then, of course, the wisdom. There is
not a truth of the Bible that if you
apply to your life, your life does not
improve dramatically. And then finally,
uh, we have the most accurate and
transparent historically robust account
that one can have of the most important
figure ever to live in the history of
the world, Jesus of Nazareth. And the
resurrection is the is the pinpoint of
my belief that Jesus did rise from the
grave so that we may live. If Genesis
1:1 and the resurrection is true,
anything in the Bible is possible.
You're looking at the greatest miracle.
The greatest miracle is creation. And
then the fact that Jesus rose from the
dead. I say, "How do you know that Jesus
rose from the dead?" Well, show me
another historical piece of a story
where so many people willingly died a
brutal death for a lie. Every single
person around him had everything to lose
and yet they went to the absolute death
from Paul to Peter to the halfbrother of
James saying that Jesus is Lord. Jesus
rose from the dead. Not to mention, if
you were going to fake a story, you
would not use female witnesses in the
ancient world. In the scriptures, it
said that the fe the women were the
first one to see Jesus Christ. If you're
trying to fake a story, you would never
do that. Not to mention the 500 people
that saw Jesus after he rose from the
dead and then the later church that
lived under persecution.
You've spoken a little bit about your
belief in the sanctity of life and the
inviable dignity of the human person. Um
I take it that you accept evolution.
Um it depends what you mean by that.
Do you think we've evolved from
primates?
I don't know.
Okay.
But I I do believe in the biblical
account of creation. I also acknowledge
that there is an abundance of scientific
research that shows adaptation. Species
change is heavily inferred in the data.
I don't know enough about it, but I
believe the scriptures to be true. And
you could you can be a theist and also
believe in God ushered evolution.
Yeah, I completely
so of which I allow people much smarter
than me to make determinations on that.
It's completely irrelevant to my core
theology though.
Okay. Um, are you happy for me to
proceed with the question though on that
basis?
Sorry. Yeah, I didn't mean to interrupt
you, but yeah.
Yeah, that's fine. So, you're kind of
vaguely, not vaguely, but you seem
generally happy with the idea that maybe
evolution um is true. I I hope that
that's the case. I mean,
I I I actually I don't believe that. I
think that
I actually I'm not I'm not saying I You
said happy to that evolution is true.
Well, not necessarily happy, but it was
a word you used, right?
Okay, fine. Uh willing to accept that
based on the uh evidence, evolution is a
fact.
No, I I I'm not saying it's a fact. I'm
actually, again, I say I'm open to have
my mind moved. Mhm.
And I look at the data, but I believe
given the abundance of equal data that
atheists must reckon with
that there is a fine-tuning problem to
our existence that I believe warrants
that there is a God. Intelligent life
came from a God and I believe the
scriptures to be true that in the
creation account there is an allowance
to say that God created the heavens and
the earth and allowed us to either
evolve through species. I happen to
believe through a faith claim
that human beings are designed. Whe that
means it's designed over a long period
of time or designed immediately.
That that that's for people smarter than
me to determine.
Fine. I suppose what I'm getting at is
if you believe in the sanctity of life
and that there is something
fundamentally different between the life
of say for instance a human being and
the life of an animal. Does that not
make that claim slightly arbitrary? What
is kind of what is personhood based in?
If not, do you see what I'm getting at?
Sort of. The scriptures say though that
God created humans male and female
distinct. are the only ones in Genesis
126127 to made in the image of God.
And so he called animals good, but they
are not image bearsers.
Okay? But
but that word that word create
is bar in Hebrew. And it's not clear
whether or not that is created an
instant over a long period of time. And
we as believers, I find no contradiction
into saying that God could have created
an instant of which I would be pleased.
I'll ask God when I get to heaven how
this all unfolded. or was it a process
of adaptation and species change? Very
smart Christians are on both sides of
this issue and they so there's what we
call in Christianity closedhand
theological issues and openhand
theological issues. Closed hand issues
would be like the resurrection of
Christ, the trinity and then there's
open-handed which would be like
esquetology or the eukarist or the
creation account. Uh this one allows
given the verbiage. It could be either
way.
Mhm. Fine. It's very hard to communicate
Christ and then also to challenge people
to think, okay, what are the
ramifications of your belief in Christ,
especially politically, especially
culturally, that gets real hard. And one
of the reasons it's hard is because we
don't all agree, right? You go around in
this room and I don't think we're all
going to agree on everything. That's
where tolerance comes in. Tolerance is
not an atheist and I agree. No, we don't
agree. Tolerance is although you are an
atheist, I respect you and we're going
to have an intelligent dialogue. Now,
that's what he does and that's what we
try and do. intelligent dialogue. Guys,
that's what a liberal arts education is
all about. A free exchange of ideas
where we don't necessarily agree, but we
communicate respectfully and we explain
why we believe what we believe. What's
the evidence that whatever it is you
believe is true. So that's the kind of
thing that we want.
The most important thing is always
Jesus. The second most important thing
is making sure that we could talk about
Jesus and worship Jesus, which is
increasingly more difficult.
People that even say that do you believe
in separation of morality and state?
Nobody does. So all laws are a
reflection of morality and all morality
comes from somewhere. There is no such
thing as neutral morality. And we
believe what the founders believe
because they put it in the halls of
Congress. They put it in the Supreme
Court and they put it all throughout the
country which is that the decalogue the
ten commandments is the core morality of
how a society and a civilization should
should exist. Right? The the ten
commandments of every person. And
finally and this is the kicker. If the
founding fathers were not Bible
believing church uh church Christians,
why did they put Leviticus on Liberty
Bell? Not John, not Psalms, not
Proverbs, not Genesis. Leviticus. Most
Americans can't spell Leviticus.
Leviticus 25:19. Proclaim liberty
throughout the land of which you are in.
It is one of the most sinister, most
unsubstantiated lies that does not come
up against any sort of academic
scrutiny. This idea that founding
fathers were a bunch of enlightenment
common law deists. The reason they hate
it is because if they The reason they
must say this is that if we actually go
back to our Christian roots and we go
back to where we once were, it's
America's best hope for revival and for
a great future.
Because when I went to Israel, I came in
contact with the living God that walked
on water and rose Lazarus from the dead.
When I went to Israel, I saw the Bible
come to life. When I went to Israel,
I saw Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and
Sarah, Becca, and Leia. When I went to
Israel, what I read as Bible stories
popped open and I said, "This is the
word of God. This is real. These are not
fairy tales or fables or things that we
tell our kids." When I went to Israel, I
was able to cry where Jesus cried. Where
he was betrayed by Judas and arrested,
where he rose from the dead and gives us
eternal life. There is a diabolical
satanic agenda every single day to try
and delegitimize the scriptures. I will
defend the Holy Land, the place that let
me see where my Lord and Savior lived.
And I will not apologize to that.
There's one author, many transcribers.
But that actually proves the point of
the Bible. Because if there was only one
person that wrote it, then might it
might have been just kind of one
person's opinion. Instead, you have
Solomon who wrote Proverbs and
Ecclesiastes, King David who wrote
Psalms, and then you have Matthew, Mark,
Luke, and John, and then you have Paul
who wrote 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans,
and 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and Jude. It
kind of proves the point that all these
people weren't all like working
together. Yet 66 different books all
came to the same conclusion that there
is a God. We are not him. We're in
constant rebellion against that God.
That God loves us so much because God is
love. That he sent his son on a rescue
mission to save us from our broken
nature so that we can live forever.
Sorry to interrupt you, but you're
getting off topic. So basically,
did I get off topic, guys? I don't think
I did.
Because if
Okay, it's okay. But so it doesn't all
come to the same conclusion because
there are multiple stories of in
different books there are multiple
stories of the same story and all of
these writers
like what you mean like the birth of
Jesus.
Yes.
But they're not contradictory. That's
actually pretty
they are contradictory.
How is the birth of Jesus? Explain to
me. I mean I mean I'm
certain some of the stories say that it
happened at a different time. Some of
them say that they happen at a different
time.
No no that's interesting. So that's not
contradictory. That actually proves the
point. So, for example, if right now,
god forbid, there was a big car accident
and there were five witnesses, someone
would say, "Well, I think he was wearing
a yellow shirt." And someone would say,
"Well, I think it was like a yellowish
red shirt." And someone would say, "I
think the car was red." And then what
the fact gatherer does is they'll see a
pattern between that because even when
you have a lot of eyewitnesses, not
everyone's eyewitness will be exactly
the same, but everyone will agree, oh,
there was a car accident. So,
and that's how the birth of Jesus was.
They weren't disagreeing that there was
a virgin birth or that it happened in
Bethlehem, but some of their like
details might have been inconsistent,
which actually proves the Bible is true.
It proves that they were not all
deriving off the same canonical
document. It proves that these were four
different accounts that went out to try
to find the truth. And people might have
had different variations of it, but they
were talking about the same elemental
events. Are you a Christian?
I'm am Catholic. Yes.
Okay, good. I'm glad. Do because I
couldn't tell based on how we're dancing
around. Do you think it would be a good
thing if more people accepted Christ?
Yes, but not in the way that most I feel
like most Christians and most Catholics
are trying to
Fair enough. So, I'm going to try to
commit
I don't agree with evangelation.
Evangelization really to be honest.
You don't believe in Christianity? Go
and make disciples of all nations was
literally the last thing that Christ
said, but that's fine. So, but let me
So, you believe that we should repent
for our sins?
Yes.
How can we repent if we don't know the
sins?
Because things do not have to be Okay.
So, if we're repenting for our sins,
these sins do not have to be like things
that are just like said like, as I'm
saying before, once in the Bible, it was
said once in the Bible, it was said a
couple times in the Bible. Those things
are not they're not like core. They're
not core beliefs. They're not
Well, let's just take the Ten
Commandments. Which one of those do you
disagree with?
Well, I I don't disagree with, to be
honest. What I'm getting at though is
that the only way we bring people to
Christ is if they know how far they how
how much they fall short of the glory of
God. They only know they fall short of
the glory of God if they know God's
perfect standard and law, which we know
throughout the scriptures. So, for
example, as I went through the ten
commandments earlier, you might say,
"Oh, I don't violate them." You're
violating do not covet every day. You're
violating do not steal every day. You're
violating that stuff every single day.
And only with that's why we need a
savior. And that's why on college
campus, all about me, all about me. It's
meology. when in reality we need Christ
to come into our life. We need to
repent. We need to get down on our hands
and knees and say, "Jesus, come into my
life.
[Music]