Cliff and Stuart Connly on Bringing the Gospel to University Campuses After Four Decades of Campus Ministry

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Reveals How 56 Founders Risked Everything to Sign America's Birth Certificate on Independence Day Weekend

Charlie Kirk Reveals How 56 Founders Risked Everything to Sign America's Birth Certificate on Independence Day Weekend

31:34

Charlie Kirk Explains Why Religious Freedom Is the Mother of All Freedoms in America

Charlie Kirk Explains Why Religious Freedom Is the Mother of All Freedoms in America

21:22

Charlie Kirk Destroys the Myth That America Was Not Founded on Christian Principles With Historical Evidence

Charlie Kirk Destroys the Myth That America Was Not Founded on Christian Principles With Historical Evidence

5:38

Charlie Kirk banner
2,417 videos 1,387,590,792 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018

Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.

Cliff and Stuart Connly on Bringing the Gospel to University Campuses After Four Decades of Campus Ministry

Cliff and Stuart Knechtle have spent decades engaging with college students across America, bringing apologetics and the gospel to some of the nation's most secular campuses. In this conversation with Charlie Kirk, the father-son pastoral team discusses the dramatic shift they've witnessed in student culture, from questions about truth to overwhelming pain and nihilism. They share their approach to campus evangelism, the response to Cliff's appearance on Logan Paul's podcast, and why moral relativism remains the biggest barrier to faith among Gen Z. The Knechtles also address why America's Christian founding matters, how parents are losing their children to secularism before college even begins, and the critical importance of homeschooling in preserving faith.

August 13, 2024

Introducing the Knechtle Ministry Team

Cliff and Stuart Knechtle represent a unique father-son ministry partnership spanning generations of campus outreach. Stuart Knechtle serves as associate pastor at Grace Community Church in New Canaan, Connecticut, where he works alongside his father. With a master's degree in Psychology and Divinity, Stuart combines these disciplines for apologetics outreach and evangelism across university campuses nationwide. Cliff Knechtle has been engaging students on college campuses for 42 years, describing himself as "an obnoxious twit who the Holy Spirit is changing." Together, they blend grace, love, and truth to communicate Christ's message in some of America's most hostile academic environments.

Their work often overlaps with political activism on campuses, including locations like the West Mall steps at UT where confrontational encounters are common. The Knechtles have visited hundreds of universities, engaging in open dialogue about faith, morality, and the existence of God with thousands of students who increasingly reject absolute truth.

The Generational Shift in Campus Culture

According to Stuart, the questions students ask have evolved dramatically over the past few decades. Thirty years ago, campus conversations centered on whether truth exists at all. Twenty years ago, students acknowledged truth might exist but wanted dialogue about what that truth might be. Today, the dominant theme is pain. Divorce rates, deaths from despair, depression, and anxiety are skyrocketing among college-age students. While classic questions about God's morality, slavery, and suffering remain common, the underlying emotional and psychological distress has intensified.

Stuart notes a particularly striking contradiction: the rise of happy nihilists. Students openly declare they're nihilists with no meaning or purpose in life, yet simultaneously embrace a "YOLO" (you only live once) mentality, claiming to be here for a good time. This philosophical incoherence reflects the deep confusion plaguing Gen Z, caught between inherited secular worldviews and the innate human need for meaning and transcendence.

The Campus Ministry Process

The Knechtles don't set up tables or solicit conversations. Instead, they receive invitations from student organizations at various universities. In earlier decades, Cliff had to initiate engagement by speaking publicly to draw crowds. Today, thanks to social media, substantial crowds often gather before they arrive, even at extremely secular schools like the University of Connecticut. These crowds are frequently hostile, creating an immediate atmosphere of confrontation and debate.

However, the Knechtles emphasize that evangelism alone is insufficient. Drawing lessons from Billy Graham's crusades, where statistics showed a high percentage of converts fell away within three weeks, they prioritize discipleship. They insist on working with campus organizations that commit to follow-up discipleship, not just one-time speaking events. The goal is helping students stay in the faith by grounding them in specific Scripture and Biblical understanding, not just emotional experiences or vague spiritual feelings.

The Logan Paul Podcast Experience

Cliff's appearance on Logan Paul's podcast presented a unique evangelistic opportunity to reach millions who rarely hear the gospel. Logan opened the conversation with disarming honesty: "I am not a Christian, but maybe by the end of this podcast I will be." Cliff found him genuine and vulnerable, contrary to his reputation for simply poking holes in arguments without sincere engagement.

Logan's primary objection was the exclusivity of Christianity. The idea that good Jews, Muslims, and Hindus need to accept Christ struck him as narrow, bigoted, and intolerant. Cliff responded by pointing out that every religious or philosophical position makes exclusive truth claims. Saying "all paths lead to God" is itself a truth claim that declares the majority of Muslims, Christians, and Jews wrong. Saying half of religions are right and half are wrong is also a truth claim. When Jesus declares "I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father except through me," He's making a truth claim that deserves examination on its evidential merits.

Cliff emphasized that making a truth claim doesn't automatically mean you're arrogant or intolerant. Claiming one plus one equals two is a truth claim, but it's not arrogance—it's reality. The question shouldn't be whether someone is making an exclusive claim, but whether the evidence supports that claim being true. Logan's mother attended the entire podcast recording, holding out her cross toward them the entire time, clearly hoping to influence her sons Jake and Logan toward faith. Despite Logan's pushback against his mother's beliefs, he engaged for over an hour, demonstrating genuine wrestling with these questions.

The Core Barrier: Moral Relativism

Both Cliff and Stuart identify moral relativism as the primary intellectual barrier preventing Gen Z from accepting Christ. The dominant Western philosophy that "all religions are true" permeates campus culture. Students frequently use illustrations like the elephant story, where blind men touch different parts of an elephant and each thinks they're touching something different. The implication is that all religions are just grasping different parts of God.

Stuart points out the fatal flaw in this analogy: if the people touching the elephant are blind, then someone claiming to see the whole picture is asserting tremendous spiritual vigilance and superiority. That person is saying, "I'm the one who's not blind, and I can see you're all just grabbing different parts." This position is not only spiritually elitist but also rejects the exclusive truth claims of 95% of the world's population. Most religions make mutually exclusive claims that cannot all be simultaneously true.

However, Cliff believes the deeper issue beneath the intellectual objections is moral. He shares the experience of his younger brother at Princeton University, who would engage in late-night apologetics discussions with classmates. Around midnight, his brother would ask: "If you're just asking these questions honestly, we can pull an all-nighter. But if the real issue is that you want to sleep around and cheat on your next exam because of the pressure to get into medical school, let's be honest." Every single time, his Princeton classmates admitted the real issue wasn't intellectual—it was moral. They wanted to live without constraints, and accepting Christian truth claims would require lifestyle changes they weren't willing to make.

The Impossibility of Living Out Moral Relativism

Cliff argues that moral relativism is not only false but impossible to live consistently. He points to extreme examples: if morality is truly relative, then the person who attempted to assassinate President Trump and killed another person was simply living out his own definition of truth. Sex traffickers could claim their actions are morally neutral because morality is relative. No one actually believes this or lives this way.

Even as children, humans demonstrate an innate understanding of moral absolutes. When a sibling gets more ice cream, children don't say "that's cool"—they say "that's not fair." When a spouse becomes physically abusive, no one says "that felt good, do it again"—they say "you should not do that, you ought not to do that." These responses reveal that humans cannot escape moral categories and obligations. The language of fairness, justice, rights, and wrongs permeates human existence because God has written His moral law on human hearts.

Stuart takes a different but complementary approach, emphasizing the practical consequences of promiscuity and moral relativism. He references research from Yale authors who documented the clear statistical correlation between promiscuity and serious mental health problems, especially for women. Men can sometimes disconnect emotionally from the physical aspects of casual sex, but women generally cannot. The data also shows drastic increases in divorce rates among those who were sexually promiscuous before marriage.

Beyond statistics, Stuart focuses on making Christ more attractive than the temporary pleasures of sin. When people find their identity in jobs, relationships, or sexual experiences, they will ultimately be crushed and disappointed. Following St. Augustine's concept of "ordered loves," Stuart explains that placing God at the top of one's priorities leads to incredible flourishing. God offers unconditional love, grace despite failings, and a foundation that cannot be shaken—unlike any earthly pursuit or relationship.

America's Christian Founding

When asked about the claim that America was not founded on Christian principles, Charlie Kirk provided an extensive response demolishing this revisionist narrative. He noted that 9 out of 13 original states required a declaration of faith to serve in government, and 13 out of 13 required some form of religious declaration. Pennsylvania's constitution explicitly stated "I profess Lord Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior." Of the 56 original signers of the Declaration of Independence, 55 were Bible-believing, church-attending Christians.

Common law, far from being secular, derives from Blackstone, who was Christian. The principles of common law—presumption of innocence, due process, and trial by jury of peers—are all biblical concepts rooted in the principle from Leviticus 19 that justice should not favor the rich or the poor. This concept of blind justice is distinctly Western and biblical, not Enlightenment or secular in origin.

The Declaration of Independence mentions God four times, and the final paragraph reads as a prayer: "We appeal to the Supreme Judge of the universe," referring to Jesus Christ as described in Revelation as the one who will judge the earth. The book of Deuteronomy was the most quoted source, religious or non-religious, during the founding period—cited more than John Locke, Montesquieu, or Blackstone. Deuteronomy, Moses's farewell address containing laws and guidance for governance, directly influenced American constitutional thought.

John Adams stated clearly: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." The body politic of America was so thoroughly Christian and Protestant that the structure of government was built specifically for a Christian population. This explains why America currently faces a constitutional crisis: we have a Christian form of government designed for a Christian people, but we are no longer a Christian nation. Liberty cannot exist without a Christian population to sustain it.

The concept of separation of church and state does not appear in the Constitution. It comes from a single letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1807 to the Danbury Baptist Convention in Massachusetts, assuring them the government would not interfere with the church—the opposite of how the phrase is used today. This letter was resurrected by the Warren and Burger Courts in the 1960s and treated as if it were constitutional text. The First Amendment's Establishment Clause states that "Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof," primarily intended to prevent a single denomination like Presbyterian, Anglican, or Quaker from dominating federal government.

One of the first acts of Congress was taxpayer-funded Bible printing and distribution. Church services were held in the Supreme Court building as late as the Jackson presidency in the 1820s. The founders placed Leviticus 25:10 on the Liberty Bell: "Proclaim liberty throughout the land." They chose Leviticus specifically, not Psalms, Proverbs, or Genesis. This selection reveals their biblical foundation and understanding of true liberty.

The claim that America's founders were Enlightenment deists who happened to use common law is a sinister, unsubstantiated lie that collapses under any academic scrutiny. This lie persists because acknowledging America's Christian roots points toward the nation's best hope for revival and a great future. If Americans return to their Christian foundations, renewal becomes possible. Therefore, secularists must deny this history to maintain their cultural power.

Addressing Grief and Suffering

When a young man named Ridge asked about coping with the loss of his 18-year-old brother in October, Cliff provided pastoral wisdom grounded in both honesty and hope. He began by acknowledging that death is terrible, referencing 1 Corinthians 15 where Paul calls death "the last enemy." Christians should not accept death as merely "part of nature." That's why we fund hospitals and practice medicine—because we are against death and for life, as Jesus said: "I have come that you might have life and have it to the full."

Cliff emphasized the importance of honesty and vulnerability within the family. Ridge admitted that while some days are good, other days bring intense anger that affects his relationships with his wife and family. Cliff affirmed this honesty and called on the family to be patient with each other and love each other through these hard times. Processing grief is not linear or simple.

Drawing on his own experience, Cliff shared the most difficult day of his life: walking around a field in Madison, Wisconsin, with his brother, a transplant surgeon, who was pouring out his heart about the death of his seven-year-old daughter in a car accident. A babysitter ran a stop sign, and a pickup truck traveling 55 miles per hour smashed into their car, sending his niece into an early grave. Cliff admitted he doesn't know why God allowed that tragedy. Anyone who claims to have easy answers to such questions is foolish.

The answer to suffering begins with patience, love, and commitment to one another during painful times. Comfort, Cliff explained, is fundamentally about presence. Being together as a family is crucial, and even more important is God's presence. This is where theological discussions become intensely practical—it's no longer about having good answers to difficult questions but about experiencing the presence of Jesus Christ during suffering.

At 70 years old, Cliff admits he's still working on knowing God's presence more deeply. He found it deeply troubling when Time Magazine published a cover story about Mother Teresa's struggles with doubt, suggesting she didn't have "real faith." This narrative misunderstands that depression and loneliness are real experiences, even for the most faithful believers, especially when life delivers brutal blows.

Cliff pointed to Philippians 3:10, where Paul writes: "I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of sharing in his sufferings." Christians worship a suffering God who was brutally beaten and nailed to a wooden cross. This God can connect with human suffering because He experienced it. He's not distant or detached but intimately acquainted with pain and grief.

Ultimately, believers have the solution to suffering and death: eternal life in heaven where there will be no more stillbirths, cancer, heart failure, or children killed in car accidents. Cliff challenged atheists and agnostics to accompany him into a hospital room where a child's body is being destroyed by terminal cancer. What will they do? Wave their fists at God and blame Him? That's a copout, misplaced blame. As a follower of Christ, Cliff can walk to the other side of the bed, hold the child's hand, seek to comfort them, and offer something more: a suffering God who genuinely cares about death and grief, who wants to comfort and wrap His arms around those who hurt. Jesus Christ is the solution to the very real problem of suffering and death.

The Crisis of Biblical Worldview Formation

A pastor from outside Detroit raised concerns about losing young people to secularism. After dinner with George Barna, the research expert told him that churches aren't losing college students during the college years—they're losing them much earlier. Worldview is developed by age 11. While God designed three institutions (family, church, and government), He gave the primary responsibility to parents to raise their children. The question is how these institutions can support parents in establishing biblical worldview before children reach adolescence.

Stuart responded with alarming statistics: 75% of Christian high schoolers turn away from the faith when they enter college. Fortunately, 40% return after college, but the 75% departure rate is catastrophic. The Knechtles focus on college students precisely because these young people weren't adequately prepared by their parents during high school. This failure isn't only about lacking intellectual tools to defend the faith, though that's significant. More fundamentally, parents—especially fathers—failed to mentor their children and demonstrate what objective right and wrong looks like.

Even more troubling, 80% of pastors' kids turn away from the faith and never return. This happens because their fathers, who are pastors, spend more time with congregants than with their own children and often fail to practice what they preach. Stuart credits being part of the 20% who retained his faith to his father Cliff, who practiced what he preached and invested enormous time with his children. Cliff received endless invitations to speak nationally and internationally but chose to become a pastor and prioritize time with his sons rather than traveling constantly.

The solution begins with fathers absolutely, but also mothers, engaging in intentional mentoring that provides a firm foundation of true right and wrong—exactly what America's founders did. Liberalism, by contrast, offers no objective morality. Students raised in this vacuum emerge screaming without knowing what they're screaming about. They have no framework for right and wrong, leading to absurd positions like claiming drug use is healthy. Without moral foundations, society descends into chaos.

Stuart noted that even in philosophy departments at top universities, the intellectual tide is turning. About 50% of philosophers now affirm God's existence, up from just 10% twenty years ago. Meanwhile, religious departments—even at Bible Belt schools like Mississippi State—are often staffed by secular liberals who teach agnosticism or vague notions of a "higher power" rather than biblical truth. Parents must equip their children intellectually to push back against these influences.

The Homeschool Renaissance

Charlie Kirk called for a renaissance of homeschooling, arguing the solution is fixable but requires sacrifice and commitment. The common excuses for not homeschooling don't hold up under scrutiny. First, parents claim they don't know how to homeschool. This is an exceptionally weak argument—parents successfully taught their children to talk and handled fundamental early education. Numerous organizations exist to supplement homeschool curricula and provide support.

The second excuse is financial: homeschooling requires one parent to stay home, forcing the family to live on a single income. Charlie points out a glaring contradiction: parents willingly go into debt or allow their children to go into debt for college, but won't make financial sacrifices to homeschool. Why would families accept debt for their child to study "North African lesbian poetry at Arizona State University" but refuse to make sacrifices to educate their children in truth during formative years? No one has a satisfactory answer.

The third reality is that many parents in the general population are simply lazy. They're not doing their job and want someone else to do it for them. Modern culture promotes the idea that parents are more important than their children, that parenting is merely a part-time responsibility alongside personal career fulfillment. The consequences of this selfishness are now undeniable.

Stuart raised an important historical question: How does the homeschool movement avoid repeating the mistakes of 1929, when Christians abandoned the halls of power at major universities? Fundamentalist Christians became terrified of Darwinian evolution and secular influence, retreating into isolated communities and ceding cultural authority. Stuart, who was homeschooled through sixth grade, asked how to balance congregating together to grow faith while ensuring Christians don't surrender power and influence in cultural institutions.

Charlie responded that protecting children up to a certain age is both wise and necessary. He doesn't know the exact age, but sixth grade might be appropriate. However, he would never place an eight-year-old in a government school under current conditions. The goal isn't to cloisters children forever but to domicile them away from toxic culture during vulnerable years, then prepare them for battle. When they're sent out, they must be deeply grounded in faith and fully aware of what's coming. Protecting the innocence of children is biblical and necessary. By age 11, worldview is largely formed; sixth grade corresponds to ages 12-13, making it a reasonable transition point.

The ramifications of throwing young children to the lions are catastrophic, as the statistics demonstrate. Balancing protection during formative years with eventual cultural engagement is essential for raising a generation capable of both preserving faith and influencing society.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!