James Li Uncovers Suspicious Google Search Patterns Before Charlie Kirk Assassination on September 10th

[00:00] Our next guest says that Google search

[00:02] terms showed an interest in many terms

[00:05] related to Charlie Kirk's assassination

[00:08] before the actual September 10th

[00:10] assassination. James Lee uh from the

[00:13] 5149 show on YouTube is reporting that

[00:16] Google Trends showed the following terms

[00:19] had been trending before Kirk was

[00:22] assassinated in two different places,

[00:24] Washington DC and also in a foreign

[00:28] nation. you may have heard of them

[00:30] called Israel. Here's a list of some of

[00:32] the things that he and others have found

[00:34] were trending prior to September 10th.

[00:37] Tyler James Robinson, the airplane, uh

[00:40] the Losi Center, which is the rooftop

[00:42] where the shooter allegedly was, the

[00:45] weapon, uh the hospital where he was

[00:47] taken, these doctors, the medical

[00:49] examiner. Now, a lot of this came

[00:51] originally from the Real Baron podcast,

[00:54] and then our next guest has furthered

[00:55] this by searching into Google Trends for

[00:57] himself. Uh, so thank you so much James

[00:59] for joining us for the first time on

[01:01] Redacted.

[01:03] >> Hey, thanks for having me on the show

[01:04] guys.

[01:05] >> Pleasure. I think you did a really good

[01:06] job with this. So can you explain to us

[01:09] the idea that these search terms peaked

[01:12] in different regions before the

[01:15] assassination in critical time periods?

[01:19] >> Well, I asked Google this question. I

[01:22] said, "Hey, what does this mean, you

[01:23] know, in terms of these search terms,

[01:25] right?" And I I pulled up I asked

[01:26] Google, okay, can you analyze some of

[01:28] these results? What do they mean? And

[01:30] they say, okay, they gave me two

[01:31] options. One of them being that, hey,

[01:33] you see all these search terms like you

[01:35] just showed your audience, the Tyler

[01:36] Robinson, Losi, Center, Mouser, 98,

[01:38] etc., etc. They said the strongest

[01:41] interpretation of this is some kind of

[01:42] non-organic activity likely originating

[01:45] from a small number of users. And it

[01:47] said that it was potentially for

[01:49] reconnaissance or verification. A small

[01:51] number um a small group of people or a

[01:54] small uh or a single individual

[01:56] potentially someone involved or aware of

[01:57] the planning of the assassination was

[01:59] using Google to conduct online

[02:01] reconnaissance or verification. And then

[02:04] the second option that they gave me very

[02:06] interesting. They said it was a this is

[02:08] highly unlikely. They call this a remote

[02:11] interpretation extraordinary coincidence

[02:13] in that somebody in Israel or relative

[02:16] close contact was somehow searching up

[02:19] the hospital the head medical examiner

[02:22] all these surgeons just by happen

[02:24] stance. So I asked Google that question

[02:26] and that's those are the two options

[02:28] that it gave me. one of them being um

[02:30] you know the more logical answer the

[02:32] other being highly likely they say

[02:34] >> but the dates in July right

[02:38] >> well so yeah there's two different

[02:39] clusters very interesting so what I

[02:41] found um from the DC dates they were

[02:44] very close to the assassination one or

[02:46] two days before so on like se uh

[02:48] September 9th September 10th that's when

[02:51] they were clustered now the searches for

[02:54] the Utah hospital medical examiner as

[02:57] well as some of the surgeons

[02:59] that work at the hospital there, the

[03:01] Tempanogos Regional Hospital. Those are

[03:04] centered around dates that are closer to

[03:06] the end of July, mid to late July. And

[03:09] one one thing very interesting about

[03:10] that that people were talking online and

[03:13] this is veering into sort of the

[03:14] conspiracy space is that if you remember

[03:17] the infamous or now infamous group text

[03:20] message from Charlie Kirk and a number

[03:21] of different donors they were discussing

[03:23] after the TPUSA event in mid July that I

[03:27] think it was in Tampa Florida. They were

[03:28] very unhappy with the platforming of

[03:30] Tucker Carlson as well as

[03:33] uh the debate between Dave Smith and

[03:36] Josh Hammer. So that's when it first was

[03:38] rumbling and now that points to some

[03:39] kind of was were those things related,

[03:41] right? Because we saw after the

[03:43] assassination, Israel was very very

[03:45] quick to say, "Nope, this wasn't us." Of

[03:47] course, why would we do something like

[03:48] this? Charlie's our greatest ally and

[03:51] then he was a lover of Israel. Why would

[03:52] he do this? And then now we know for a

[03:54] fact that's been confirmed by Candace

[03:56] Owens as well as other people's

[03:57] reporting that no, there were indeed

[03:59] some some strife going on behind the

[04:01] scenes. So then now that leads to, you

[04:03] know, I think a very credible motive.

[04:05] And with these Google searches now,

[04:06] we're starting to see, okay, is there a

[04:08] potentially

[04:10] maybe not a smoking gun quite yet, but

[04:12] at least something that we need to

[04:13] investigate further, right? Because a

[04:15] lot of things or a lot of responses that

[04:17] I got from people cuz I was very early,

[04:19] you know, on I was like, "Hey, this

[04:20] doesn't look right. This doesn't look

[04:21] like a lone gunman situation. It looks

[04:24] sort of like a conspiracy." You know,

[04:25] you had that guy George Zinn in the

[04:27] audience saying, "It was me. Shoot me.

[04:29] Shoot me." Very, very bizarre. and you

[04:31] had a very quick disinformation campaign

[04:33] that started right after the event. So

[04:36] that does not look like just a a lone

[04:39] gunman type of situation.

[04:41] And you know, a lot of people were like,

[04:43] "How could you say we have you have no

[04:44] no evidence?" Well, now we're starting

[04:46] to see some evidence creep in. And one

[04:49] thing, you know, this is kind of a a

[04:51] cheeky joke, but you know, the MSAD, if

[04:53] they were involved in this kind of

[04:54] thing, the MSAD is supposedly the one of

[04:56] the greatest spy organizations in the

[04:57] world. So, you got to give them a little

[04:58] bit of credit in that, you know, they

[05:01] would hopefully do a good job and not

[05:02] leave too many trails behind. If we

[05:05] online were able to salute this out

[05:06] within a couple of days, I I would feel

[05:08] like they weren't doing a good job. So,

[05:10] I think that's kind of where I'm at with

[05:12] this. Like, this is certainly enough

[05:14] that it should warrant investigation,

[05:16] more investigation, more conversation.

[05:18] And then, you know, you just saw Cash

[05:19] Patel, I think it was yesterday, go on

[05:22] and say, "Well, any kind of discussion

[05:24] online from people on social media that

[05:27] is going to be very harmful for

[05:29] Charlie's family and we must shut down

[05:31] this conversation." And I think that's

[05:33] that's kind of a a red flag for me is

[05:36] that um you know, saying that

[05:38] investigating further is somehow not

[05:41] good. That sounds kind of like a cover

[05:43] up or a scop. That's kind of how I

[05:45] >> Someone in our chat room just said,

[05:46] "Yeah, when when people are trying to

[05:48] tell you to look the other way or just

[05:50] to play it off as like a coincidence,

[05:52] then then you know, you should run away

[05:54] from those people." And I think there's

[05:56] two camps been emerging from this

[05:57] immediately. The the yay, we are buy

[05:59] we're going to buy everything the Fed is

[06:01] telling us, the FBI is telling us this

[06:03] was the guy, nothing to see here. And

[06:05] then there's a lot of us who are saying,

[06:07] "Wait a second, there's too many

[06:08] inconsistencies here. Why would there be

[06:10] these clusters in DC and Israel

[06:13] searching for things like the Losi

[06:15] Center? I mean, who who cares in Israel

[06:17] about the Losi Center? I'd never even

[06:19] heard of it until everything that

[06:21] unfolded. I mean, why would people

[06:23] specifically being searching out for

[06:24] these the the the Mouser 98, the alleged

[06:27] weapon ahead of time? I mean, I know

[06:30] this is jumping in a very archaic rare,

[06:34] >> you know, rifle that's untraceable

[06:36] somehow. And it and it was very

[06:37] interesting if you guys have that foot

[06:39] uh the the screenshot, but there was no

[06:41] interest in it. All of a sudden it

[06:42] spikes up. Um and I just thought, man,

[06:46] that's that's got to be more than just a

[06:48] coincidence because nobody's really

[06:50] talking about this gun, right? It has no

[06:52] interest in Miles 98. Boom. All of a

[06:53] sudden, it spikes up, which is

[06:55] >> this is the one we're showing for for

[06:57] Tyler James Robinson. But again, it's

[06:59] it's the similar patterns.

[07:01] >> Can I ask you though? So when we look at

[07:03] this forensically, like it's one thing

[07:05] to speculate and say, you know, why were

[07:07] these people doing this? It's like, you

[07:09] know, newspapers printing or reporters

[07:11] reporting that building 7 had collapsed

[07:13] before it had collapsed. Like it's all

[07:15] very interesting, right? Like how why

[07:17] why would you mention building 7 had

[07:18] collapsed and it hadn't collapsed yet?

[07:20] Oh, okay. um can we forensically

[07:24] identify who these individuals are

[07:25] through IP addresses or otherwise who

[07:28] are actually doing these searches or

[07:29] does our sort of journey just end with

[07:31] this?

[07:32] >> Well, based on so I didn't research

[07:34] after this looking into okay how does

[07:36] the Google trend thing work and

[07:38] apparently what it does is it takes

[07:40] random samples from certain geographic

[07:43] regions that you're filtering for. So it

[07:45] based on what they're publicly saying it

[07:47] it scramles the data. So there's no way

[07:49] to identify a unique IP address or

[07:53] multiple IP addresses that are doing

[07:54] this search. I don't know Google behind

[07:57] >> could Google unscramble it. I mean after

[07:59] all Google started as a with a grant

[08:00] from from the CIA, right?

[08:02] >> That's what I so that's what I'm

[08:04] implying there. I don't know if they

[08:05] have a back door. They probably likely

[08:07] do have a back door for the government.

[08:08] I think they're more or less required to

[08:10] do so. So I think there's definitely

[08:12] more investigation that can be done. And

[08:14] what's something that's interesting too

[08:15] cuz um you mentioned um Baron Coleman.

[08:17] He was one of the first to to report

[08:19] this. So kudos to the decentralized uh

[08:22] independent journalism world. That's the

[08:24] kind of stuff that you know we we are

[08:27] that that's such a such a good sign for

[08:28] the world's journalism to have people

[08:30] come on and bring this theory to uh to

[08:32] to the public, have other people

[08:33] scrutinize it. And one thing that I was

[08:35] doing over the course of maybe two or

[08:37] three days, I noticed that these

[08:38] searches were changing over time. And

[08:40] then the main searches, like some of

[08:42] them are still there, some of them you

[08:43] could still find right now, but the big

[08:45] big names, like if you search Tyler Jane

[08:47] Robinson, do that exact same filtering.

[08:49] I just did this yesterday again. And now

[08:52] it it's not even a flat line. They just

[08:54] say this search term is not available.

[08:56] It's not there anymore.

[08:58] >> Right? That's the other big piece of the

[08:59] story. Now they're just wiping it. So

[09:01] all of the research that you did, like,

[09:02] good thing you got screenshots because

[09:05] now you can't do it anymore. They're not

[09:06] letting you do this research, Google,

[09:08] >> right? It's really bizarre. It's it's

[09:10] not saying it's it's not like zeroing it

[09:12] out. It's just saying this search term

[09:13] is unavailable.

[09:15] >> Unavailable.

[09:16] Okay. I mean,

[09:19] so I mean, clearly we all searched it

[09:23] collectively on September well, I guess

[09:26] 11th or 12th when he was allegedly

[09:29] turned himself in. So now we can't even

[09:31] see that because they can't manipulate

[09:33] that data. That's outrageous. I mean,

[09:36] and I guess, you know, you would think

[09:38] that like these bad actors who may have

[09:41] been involved, the the way you put it uh

[09:44] in your video is that it's possible that

[09:46] this story was written months before it

[09:49] happened and so the authors of the

[09:51] story, the architects

[09:53] were not even using some kind of VPN or

[09:57] spyware. I mean, I don't I

[10:00] >> Well, I mean,

[10:01] >> you would think they'd be a little bit

[10:02] smarter than that.

[10:04] >> I would I would think that. I don't know

[10:05] if it's just some some kind of trace

[10:07] where maybe they were doing um maybe

[10:10] they were using VPNs, but I don't know

[10:12] if anybody would have thought that this

[10:13] this would have been a potential lead

[10:15] after the fact, right? They maybe

[10:17] thought I think

[10:18] >> right now a lot of what I'm seeing is

[10:21] they're kind of playing catch-up in how

[10:23] decentralized journalism works where

[10:25] everybody's soothing out things, finding

[10:27] different avenues to to investigate and

[10:30] because it used to be I mean if you look

[10:31] back in time this was just it would have

[10:33] been case closed. it would have been,

[10:35] "Okay, Tyler Robinson is your guy. We

[10:36] have the murder weapon and now we have

[10:39] him apprehended. So, let's move on to

[10:41] another story." Uh, I don't think it's

[10:44] 1963

[10:46] anymore. It's 2025. So, um, I think

[10:50] they're playing a little bit of catch-up

[10:51] here,

[10:52] >> right?

[10:52] >> Yeah. People like you.

[10:55] >> There's so many similarities here. If

[10:56] you look at the things that happened,

[10:58] right? A lot of people are familiar with

[11:00] the JFK assassination, but I did a video

[11:02] digging into some of the other

[11:04] high-profile assassinations in history,

[11:06] including RFK, as well as uh the MLK

[11:10] assassination. And there's just so many

[11:12] parallels to this story of say evidence

[11:16] getting destroyed. Right? Right now, you

[11:18] see UVA being basically completely

[11:21] reconstructed. That whole site is now

[11:22] totally different. I don't know why.

[11:24] Some people are saying maybe because

[11:25] they're afraid that somebody's going to

[11:27] find the bullet. They still haven't

[11:28] released any kind of ballistics matching

[11:30] or anything like that. And in 1968,

[11:34] was it for from MLK? There was

[11:36] eyewitness saying that, hey, they saw

[11:38] some some person in the bushes across

[11:40] the street uh that was in a different

[11:42] location than than the actual shooter,

[11:45] James Earl Ray, who they call, you know,

[11:47] the FBI head at the time, uh, J Hoover,

[11:50] said that he was a very hateful person.

[11:53] That's why he did this and, you know, we

[11:55] got him. And then, uh, the next day the

[11:58] Memphis public works went and cut down

[11:59] that bush. So that's a very very similar

[12:03] parallel to this situation where you're

[12:04] seeing crime scenes being basically

[12:06] reconstructed. And also in that

[12:08] particular case, there was no ballistics

[12:11] match that ever occurred. They weren't

[12:13] able to match the bullet to the gun. And

[12:15] in this situation, I don't think they've

[12:16] been able to do that. And I think you've

[12:18] had some ballistics experts on on your

[12:20] show to talk about how, you know, it's

[12:22] basically impossible for uh a 30 six to

[12:27] cause such little dam. I mean, it was a

[12:29] very traumatic and catastrophic hit, of

[12:31] course, but you know, a lot of people

[12:33] are saying his head should have been

[12:34] blown off. So, how do you explain that?

[12:36] >> Yeah. Don't ask questions, though,

[12:38] James.

[12:38] >> They've they've given us the official

[12:40] story, so no more questions to be asked.

[12:42] Your work is done here.

[12:43] >> Right,

[12:44] >> James? Great to see you. Great work on

[12:46] this. Encourage people to check out,

[12:47] we'll link it up and make sure people

[12:48] can check out all of your work on this.

[12:50] Thank you so much for for joining us. We

[12:52] really appreciate it. Love to have you

[12:53] back on the show.

[12:54] >> Hey, Glenn, Natalie, thank you so much

[12:56] for having me on. Appreciate you guys.

[12:57] >> You bet. Thank you, James. Great to have