Max Blumenthal Exposes FBI's Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative and Deep State Deflection Under Kash Patel

[00:00] and within America First, the America

[00:02] First movement, who do not trust the

[00:05] official story and don't trust the FBI

[00:07] investigation and don't trust Cash

[00:09] Patel. What we need to know is what

[00:13] happened to Charlie Kirk's body? Where

[00:15] is Charlie Kirk's body? And was there an

[00:18] autopsy? What do we know about the

[00:21] autopsy? What do we know about the

[00:23] ballistics report?

[00:26] Max Blumenthal just shared the dark

[00:28] truth about the FBI's Charlie Kirk

[00:30] assassination narrative and explains in

[00:32] this clip why so many people still don't

[00:35] buy into it or at least parts of it and

[00:37] what that tells us about American

[00:40] politics today, the corruption of the

[00:41] deep state and what Cash Patel has been

[00:44] doing to deflect from any kind of

[00:47] reasonable suspicion about this

[00:49] narrative in recent days. So, let's get

[00:51] right into it. Please like the video and

[00:53] subscribe to the channel.

[00:55] What are we going to ever find out what

[00:57] has happened to Charlie Kirk? Because it

[00:59] seems that he's fading away from the

[01:00] news and just Candace Owen is talking

[01:03] about him. No one knows.

[01:06] Well, there's going to be a trial of

[01:07] Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter,

[01:11] the trial so far, the the judge has

[01:14] banned all filming and taping of the

[01:18] proceedings. And actually, there's now a

[01:21] petition by friends and supporters of

[01:23] Charlie Kirk to allow taping from inside

[01:26] the courtroom. I'm not sure what they

[01:28] think will come out of that, but TPUSA

[01:31] is officially supporting that.

[01:33] And additionally, there was a story in

[01:36] the New York Times yesterday

[01:38] which suggests that those who are trying

[01:41] to learn more about the FBI

[01:45] investigation

[01:47] and

[01:49] whether there was a second shooter,

[01:51] whether there was any foreign

[01:54] connection,

[01:55] whether there was anything to be

[01:58] suspicious about other and whether there

[02:01] was any

[02:05] any angle outside of the official story,

[02:08] which is that a

[02:12] disturbed young man who was angered by

[02:15] Charlie Kirk's anti-trans rhetoric shot

[02:18] him for political reasons

[02:20] uh should be shamed. This article homeed

[02:24] in on the director of counter

[02:26] inelligence in the office of the

[02:27] director of national intelligence. His

[02:29] name is Joe Kent. He works directly

[02:32] under Tulsi Gabbard. And the article was

[02:34] obviously inspired by leaks and comments

[02:38] off on background from the FBI.

[02:42] >> Yeah, Max is generally right about this.

[02:44] He's right about Turning Point USA's

[02:46] position to allow cameras into the

[02:48] courtroom for court proceedings. Whether

[02:51] not or not this goes to trial, they want

[02:53] the cameras in the courtroom for the

[02:55] hearings leading up to that point. If it

[02:57] does, included in this group. And

[03:00] Turning Point USA is Erica Kirk. You

[03:02] know, say what you want about what that

[03:04] means about this case. And you know, I

[03:07] think that transparency is the best for

[03:10] this kind of situation. This is the

[03:11] highest profile political assassination

[03:14] arguably since RFK or Martin Luther

[03:17] King. So, the public being very

[03:19] skeptical about a lot of this narrative

[03:21] that the FBI has thrown out at us, you

[03:24] know, it would behoove them to show

[03:25] that. He's also right about Joe Kent.

[03:28] Joe Kent is one of Tulsi Gabbard's

[03:30] closest subordinates. This is covered in

[03:33] major publications like the New York

[03:35] Times and other legacy media

[03:36] establishment in addition to dissident,

[03:40] you know, independent media sources

[03:42] showing how Joe Kent has approached the

[03:44] FBI and Cash Patel in particular with

[03:47] potential leads regarding foreign

[03:49] involvement in the Charlie Kirk

[03:52] assassination. Now, Cash Patel was open

[03:54] about, hey, we're going to explore all

[03:56] leads. were going to entertain a lot of

[03:58] the theories and abnormalities people on

[04:00] the internet have been talking about and

[04:02] showing on this. But is he in this case?

[04:04] No. In fact, he seems completely dug in

[04:07] against it, being troubled that Kent had

[04:10] the gall to do this, believing that it

[04:12] would compromise his investigation. And

[04:15] instead of entertaining this, he wants

[04:18] to dig his heels in on the narrative

[04:19] they have. Maybe they have a case.

[04:21] Whatever. We'll see. We'll see how the

[04:23] defense treats this. That's going to be

[04:25] very interesting. But, you know, if

[04:27] you're going to say that we're going to

[04:28] bring transparency to the deep state and

[04:30] investigate all angles, it doesn't seem

[04:33] like you're doing that, even when it

[04:34] comes from within the administration.

[04:37] So, remember, the FBI covered up the

[04:38] Epstein files. Now, they want this

[04:40] completely out the window. which was

[04:42] angry that Joe Kent had begun prying

[04:45] into the FBI's investigation, obviously

[04:48] on behalf of elements in the White House

[04:51] and within America First, the America

[04:53] First movement, who do not trust the

[04:56] official story and don't trust the FBI

[04:58] investigation and don't trust Cash

[05:00] Patel, who fumbled badly during the

[05:03] first 72 hours of the investigation and

[05:06] was responsible for various embarrassing

[05:09] displays about seeing Charlie Kirk and

[05:11] Valhalla.

[05:13] So Joe Kent was shamed in this article

[05:15] painted as a crazed conspiracy theorist

[05:18] for simply seeking to

[05:21] uh vet the FBI's investigation from

[05:24] within a civilian position. And I think

[05:27] uh that's the kind of accountability

[05:29] that people who who supported Donald

[05:32] Trump and supported Charlie Kirk

[05:35] probably want.

[05:37] >> Yeah. I remember drain the swamp and

[05:39] bring transparency to deep state crimes

[05:42] and deep state conspiracies that affect

[05:44] us all, undermine our elected

[05:48] government, and undermine basic

[05:50] liberties. That was kind of the the

[05:53] smoke screen they used to get elected,

[05:55] then assued that completely, especially

[05:57] under the Epstein coverup. That's

[05:59] exactly right. Joe Kent from within the

[06:02] administration, that's not even good

[06:03] enough. Now, you know, they can just

[06:05] dismiss all the the people that they say

[06:07] are cooks out on the internet, but

[06:09] there's a guy internal that's very high

[06:11] ranking in the Department of National

[06:14] Intelligence, and he's going to bring

[06:16] these potentials to the FBI, to cash

[06:19] Mattel, and just be dismissed outright.

[06:21] That is how this administration handles

[06:23] business. It's exactly the same way in

[06:25] which they handled the Epstein story, by

[06:28] the way. just covering it up, calling it

[06:29] a hoax, saying it would compromise, you

[06:31] know, what information they have, etc.

[06:34] So, yeah, I'm with Max. I have a lot of

[06:37] misgivings about the FBI narrative for

[06:39] sure. They couldn't get their story

[06:41] straight. Mix is right about that. In

[06:43] the first days, they bumbled upon, you

[06:47] know, stumbling upon how many times he

[06:49] switched clothing, had a difference of

[06:52] opinion when it came to the original

[06:54] statements regarding the disassembly or

[06:56] reassembly of the firearm, and then

[06:58] discarded that by the time of the

[07:00] indictment. So, there is reason that

[07:02] people don't believe this narrative,

[07:04] hook, line, and sinker. And I think Max

[07:06] is bringing that out here. But it

[07:07] threatens to unravel an official story

[07:10] which has been weaponized by the Trump

[07:13] administration and the broader

[07:16] conservative movement to further erode

[07:20] free speech in the US to strip people of

[07:23] their visas for making

[07:25] uh tasteless comments about Charlie Kirk

[07:29] for putting people in prison. There's

[07:31] actually a man who's been in prison for

[07:34] comments he made about Charlie Kirk

[07:36] online

[07:38] and for generally ramping up the

[07:40] security state and enacting some kind of

[07:44] FBI co-intelpro style operation against

[07:47] the left. [snorts]

[07:49] >> Yeah, actually Max is right about this.

[07:51] This story wasn't covered very closely

[07:53] either, but there was a Tennessee man in

[07:55] my state jailed for a post he made about

[07:58] Charlie Kirk. I think he's been released

[08:00] now, but he was literally jailed for

[08:02] making a post about the Charlie Kirk

[08:04] case. I mean, this is what we've gotten

[08:06] to now where it's not just critics of

[08:08] Israel that have their their visas

[08:10] potentially revoked for that, but also

[08:13] for questioning the way in which the FBI

[08:16] is investigating a case. You can't you

[08:18] can't even make that up. It's just the

[08:20] America in which we live now. The deep

[08:22] state remains supreme regardless of who

[08:24] gets elected. The deep state remains the

[08:26] same regardless of the names. on the

[08:28] bogus grounds that Tyler Robinson was

[08:31] actually a member of the left uh when if

[08:34] he if he was the lone shooter was

[08:37] clearly a nihilist who was acting

[08:39] outside of any political movement's

[08:41] parameters.

[08:43] >> Before you sorry Nema before you finish

[08:45] this question I forgot I wanted to make

[08:46] one point about Charlie Kirk and then we

[08:48] can come back to this question.

[08:50] >> What we need to know is what happened to

[08:53] Charlie Kirk's body? Where is Charlie

[08:56] Kirk's body? And was there an autopsy?

[09:00] What do we know about the autopsy? What

[09:02] do we know about the ballistics report?

[09:06] Where is the body buried? Is it buried?

[09:09] I mean, what what's going on there?

[09:10] Because that's what we've heard nothing

[09:12] about.

[09:12] >> And I think it's the it's the data that

[09:16] everybody deserves that could put all of

[09:19] the supposed conspiracy theories to

[09:21] rest. So, I just wanted to put that

[09:22] point out there.

[09:25] Yeah. I mean, interesting enough, Utah

[09:27] has a law that says you have to conduct

[09:29] an autopsy on the deceased. It's not

[09:32] clear that that hasn't been done. When

[09:34] it comes to Charlie Kirk, it's not even

[09:36] that clear that he's been buried. There

[09:38] have been some media reports that he did

[09:40] have a private burial that wasn't

[09:42] attended by many people in various

[09:45] places. I can't confirm any of them, but

[09:47] there is some information about that on

[09:49] the internet. But in either case, to

[09:51] release the autopsy information, it

[09:53] would take consent from the family. It

[09:55] doesn't seem like that's given. So yeah,

[09:57] it would be pertinent to see if any

[09:59] ballistics could be done on this bullet

[10:01] that was supposedly stuck in Charlie

[10:03] Kirk's neck, the 30 six bullet that went

[10:06] into his neck, somehow stuck there. I

[10:08] know people have debated that subject

[10:09] endlessly, too, whether that's even

[10:11] possible or even fathomable. And I got

[10:14] to tell you, you know, I've talked to

[10:16] some people, some hunters that that talk

[10:18] about this. Some of them can't believe

[10:20] that that's even remotely possible that

[10:22] it wouldn't pierce completely through

[10:24] his neck, go out the back, which it

[10:25] didn't happen in this case. Even footage

[10:28] that people have shown kind of from the

[10:29] side, mostly from the back, don't seem

[10:31] to show that whatsoever. And then other

[10:34] people say, well, it's impossible to

[10:36] know unless you know the kind of bullet

[10:38] it is. Many different bullets are

[10:39] designed to do different things. and

[10:41] their experience leads them to believe

[10:43] that from hunting, you know, they've

[10:44] seen bullets do all sorts of things when

[10:47] striking flesh that they didn't

[10:48] initially expect when it comes to

[10:50] animals and things like that. I don't

[10:51] know. I don't have a strong position in

[10:53] that. I'm not an expert in that, but

[10:55] again, it behooves the FBI and the state

[10:58] to divulge this information to the

[10:59] public and the family if they want

[11:01] people to stop having, you know,

[11:03] conspiratorial thoughts that they don't

[11:05] like. And you know, many of them at

[11:07] Turning Point USA have called us, you

[11:09] know, akin to, you know, being addicted

[11:12] to porn for wanting to seek the truth in

[11:14] this matter. But there are still

[11:15] lingering questions. You're not insane

[11:17] if you bring them up. And I mean, the

[11:20] mentality to paint you as an insane

[11:22] person for that without actually

[11:24] refuting some of the allegations. It

[11:26] just draws greater suspicion toward the

[11:28] FBI. And look, I don't really think this

[11:30] case is going to trial. If the defense

[11:32] can't deal with the accusations of the

[11:35] parents against this kid and the text

[11:37] messages, you know, he's going to go

[11:40] behind bars for life. Now, if they can,

[11:42] if they really think that, you know,

[11:44] these messages are fake or they are

[11:46] fake, they have access to the phone.

[11:48] They're going to have subpoena power to

[11:49] the actual phone, to the phone of Lance

[11:52] Twig, who is the other recipient of the

[11:54] phone, to AT&T or Verizon or whoever his

[11:57] provers's records are to confirm that.

[11:59] That's very easily confirmed whether the

[12:01] texts are true or not. That's why I I'm

[12:04] sorry. I mean, the texts do seem like in

[12:07] some ways they'd be written in a way to

[12:09] divulge every aspect of this crime. But

[12:12] if that's the case and they're

[12:13] falsified, this guy's going to walk. He

[12:15] can't be the psy you say he is. If the

[12:17] defense can just throw those out based

[12:20] on falsification, that's not a minor

[12:22] error. That would be a complete hit job

[12:24] by the FBI to frame this kid for

[12:27] something he didn't do in that scenario.

[12:29] So, I don't think this is going to go to

[12:31] trial. I think the evidence is too

[12:33] insurmountable against him. Now, whether

[12:35] other people were involved, that's

[12:36] another question that I have. The George

[12:38] Zinn thing is still interesting to me

[12:41] and not much has been reported or

[12:43] explored on that since he was released

[12:45] by police after he said, "I tried to

[12:47] help, you know, distract so the real

[12:50] shooter could get out of the way." I

[12:52] mean, that's pretty interesting. And

[12:54] that's kind of just going by the wayside

[12:56] with a lot of people paying attention to

[12:58] things that I think are a little bit

[12:59] more minutia. Now, a lot of people have

[13:01] talked about the flights that happened

[13:03] recently, the potential military

[13:05] connections. Candace Sons has explored

[13:07] that and other things, but I think Max

[13:10] hits it right here when it comes to the

[13:12] distrust people have in the FBI

[13:14] narrative is of no fault other than the

[13:16] FBI. You know, if you're going to entrap

[13:19] people in schemes like January 6th and

[13:21] the Whitmer kidnapping plot, you're

[13:22] going to kill women and children in Waco

[13:24] and Ruby Ridge. You're going to ruin the

[13:26] life of Richard Juel. You're going to

[13:27] wiretap Martin Luther King, Stokeley

[13:29] Carmichael, and Malcolm X. You're going

[13:31] to try to get Martin Luther King to

[13:33] commit suicide. and you wonder why we're

[13:36] skeptical about your narratives and your

[13:38] ability to investigate cases like this.

[13:41] It's like screw you, man. That's why you

[13:43] have no one to blame but yourself and

[13:46] your criminal agency that needs to be

[13:48] abolished. It can't be reformed. It's

[13:50] not going to be steered in a better

[13:51] direction just if you get your favorite

[13:53] steward of it like Cash Patel as we were

[13:55] told by much of Trump's support base.

[13:58] That's just the truth. But we'll see

[14:00] where this goes. We need more answers.

[14:03] Um maybe some of it will come out in

[14:05] subsequent court releases or if it goes

[14:08] to trial they'll certainly bring this

[14:10] forward. There's a chance that you know

[14:11] the indictment talks about the parents

[14:14] talking to the authorities and saying

[14:18] that you know Charlie did it because

[14:22] or I'm sorry uh Tyler did it because

[14:24] Charlie Kirk spread too much hate. I

[14:27] mean

[14:29] maybe. But also they say that uh the

[14:33] family was involved in identifying him

[14:35] in the surveillance footage and he spoke

[14:38] to Tyler and that's when he learned that

[14:40] he was involved and it's potential that

[14:42] the family signed an affidavit in this

[14:45] effect before any charges were made.

[14:47] That's something also a lot of people

[14:48] aren't talking about. It'd be very hard

[14:50] for the defense to dismiss or counter in

[14:54] some way if that's being acknowledged.

[14:56] And if the Discord messages, some of

[14:58] which this guy released were

[15:01] incriminating. He he does essentially

[15:04] imply that he was involved in this

[15:06] murder in Discord releases. If you want

[15:08] to watch and learn more about that, the

[15:10] guy, YouTuber named Turkey Tom released

[15:12] a new video on that. He got three leaked

[15:16] Discord server scripts sent to him and

[15:19] did a very keen analysis on all three of

[15:22] those. And you know what he presented

[15:24] was at least interesting and sheds more

[15:25] light on this. But we'll see where this

[15:27] goes. Let me know if you agree with Max

[15:29] on it. Let me know what questions you

[15:32] still have, what we need to know, and

[15:34] let me know in the comments down below.

[15:36] Please like the video, subscribe to the

[15:37] channel, subscribe to Dialogue Works.

[15:39] Nema's awesome, awesome interview, man.

[15:41] I really appreciate your work in this

[15:43] interview. And if you like this video,

[15:44] please consider becoming a YouTube

[15:46] member of mine. You can do that by

[15:47] clicking the join button below. If you

[15:49] do that, I'll give you access to all my

[15:51] videos before they go live to the

[15:52] general public on YouTube. And until I

[15:55] see you guys next time, no more war, no

[15:57] more debt, no more inflation, and no

[15:59] more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you

[16:01] in the next one.