Rudy Bautista Questions Missing Evidence and Death Penalty Push in Charlie Kirk Shooting Case
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
FBI Director Kash Patel and Utah Governor Announce Arrest in Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University
4:31:53
Charlie Kirk Assassination Sparks National Crisis: NewsNation Reports From Utah Valley University Crime Scene
38:28
Governor Cox and FBI Director Kash Patel Announce Arrest in Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation
1:11:23
Rudy Bautista Questions Missing Evidence and Death Penalty Push in Charlie Kirk Shooting Case
Rudy Bautista, a rule eight attorney qualified to defend capital cases in Utah, raises concerns about potentially missing surveillance evidence in the Tyler Robinson case. After Charlie Kirk's shooting, Washington County authorities claim surveillance footage of Robinson turning himself in is no longer available after the 30-day retention period. Bautista, a 26-year veteran criminal defense attorney, argues the case doesn't meet the standard for aggravated murder and believes the death penalty conversation was pushed too soon for political reasons rather than based on objective evidence.
Rudy Bautista is a rule eight attorney, a qualification only a select number of defense attorneys in Utah have in order to defend cases with a capital offense, some involving a possible death penalty. While he is not affiliated with the case involving Tyler Robinson, who is accused of shooting and killing Charlie Kirk in September, he reviewed potential missing evidence in the case that raises serious concerns.
On September 17, 2025, Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby held a press conference after Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter was taken into custody in Washington County less than two days after the shooting. According to reports, Robinson's friend drove Tyler and his parents to the office where he was greeted by plainclothes detectives. The sheriff stated their job was not to interview, but just to get him there.
After learning of this, a public records request was submitted to obtain any video of Tyler Robinson walking into the jail facility. Washington County responded, saying there were no records responsive to the request, as Robinson did not go to the jail area. A request for any holding room video was denied.
A few weeks later, a more generalized request was submitted for surveillance video showing Tyler Robinson walking into the sheriff's office. The response stated that the office does not have any applicable records responsive to the request as the surveillance footage is no longer available after the 30-day retention period.
Attorney Expresses Concern Over Destroyed Evidence
Bautista expressed serious concerns about the missing footage. "If in fact it has been destroyed and not preserved is very concerning. And if it has, then it's very concerning that they're telling you they don't have it. If they no longer have it, I would have expected to say that this video has been provided to the Utah County law enforcement. Please contact them. But instead, this response leaves, in my opinion, as trying to shut the door and not give you free access to the press," he explained.
While it's not clear if the video exists and was just handed over to another agency, in a response, Washington County shared they don't believe the video was shared with anyone involved in the case. For the defense, Bautista noted that wanting to get videos showing that Robinson turned himself in and the manner he did so would be crucial for the defense work of mitigation.
Not a Death Penalty Case According to Defense Expert
Bautista, with 26 years as a criminal defense attorney in Utah, is currently working another capital case in Utah County with the state intending to seek the death penalty. He believes the Charlie Kirk case does not meet the threshold for capital punishment.
"Again, Mr. Kirk by all accounts was a great young man who was helping educate people and we encourage that. And this is very tragic that he's lost his life, but it is not a death penalty case," Bautista stated.
When asked what stands out about the case, Bautista pointed to the charging decision itself. "What stands out to me is this is not an aggravated murder case. In order for it to be an aggravated murder case, something that can qualify for the death penalty, there has to be an aggravating factor."
Bautista says the alleged weapon in the shooting alone doesn't meet the standard for prosecutors to seek the death penalty. He explained that the risk of hitting someone else really isn't there, which is why he believes that aggravating factor is weak.
Political Motivation Alleged in Charging Decision
"Now, why it was charged that way is clearly political," Bautista asserted. He referenced public sentiment, noting some have said "I hope he gets the death penalty" and reminded people that "we still have the death penalty here in the state of Utah."
However, Bautista emphasized the proper prosecutorial approach: "Instead of looking at it objectively, a prosecutor is to look at the evidence objectively and then charge the person with the most applicable crime. Here where they're saying it will be this crime, we are now taking evidence. So they're trying to make the facts fit a cause of action that is not applicable."
Bautista believes the death penalty conversation in this case was pushed too soon and "certainly suggests abuse in our higher government."
Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty against Tyler Robinson, who is accused of shooting and killing Charlie Kirk. Gray said on September 16th, just days after the shooting, that the decision to seek the death penalty was made independently.
