Up Next
Candace Owens Shares Her Journey from Hate Crime Victim to Conservative Voice at Liberty University
33:33
Is Anything Holding MAGA Together? Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
1:10:32
Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Discuss Breaking Group Identities and Awakening Black Conservatives
7:29
The Core Disagreement: Individual Achievement Versus Inherited Privilege
Russell Brand opens the conversation by pressing Candace Owens on a fundamental observation: most people living in systems of elitism and privilege occupy those positions because of advantages endowed upon them, not purely through individual merit. Brand describes Owens as more of an individualist than himself, and she strongly contests his perspective throughout their exchange.
Brand questions whether individualistic culture is destroying spiritual and human principles of community. He challenges Owens to consider how economic inequality creates a sense of injustice and unfairness in people. His central argument: "Do you know what Candace, 90% of people are rich do you know why they're rich? They were born rich."
Owens responds by defending individual achievement and questioning Brand's perspective: "I believe in the individual, you don't. That's what the fundamental difference is." She argues that Brand is "discounting the human spirit" by not believing that individual greatness can be replicated.
Human Nature and Natural Instincts
Owens draws on examples from the natural world to defend her position. She asks Brand to consider basic human instincts: "Are you going to make sure that everyone on this block is fed before you feed yourself? Do you go around and say hey have you had breakfast this morning?"
Her argument centers on the idea that human instinct drives us to feed ourselves and our families first. If we have an excess, then naturally we want to help others—but the primary incentive is self-preservation and individual success.
Brand counters that we're no longer in the natural world but in "a world of accumulation and excess," and he questions whether this system is even working. He acknowledges his own internal battle between selfish impulses for pleasure and the desire to live within systems that encourage collective and communal values.
The Wealth Concentration Problem
Brand raises the stark reality of wealth concentration: "The richest 15 people on the planet have got as much accumulative wealth as the poorest five billion."
Owens dismisses this as referring to "literally point zero zero zero zero one percent of the world." She then turns the tables, pointing out that these ultra-wealthy individuals—George Soros, Jeff Bezos—are the ones pushing for socialist policies to ensure nobody else has the opportunity to achieve what they've achieved.
Brand suggests his version of socialism: "Take Jeff Bezos' wealth from him except for a reasonable stipend for him to live on, something like you know he can have 10 million a year or something, tax Amazon to the ground."
Owens responds with data: "The top 10 percent pay for 85% of all the taxes. When people say they're going to raise their taxes more I'm just like how much more? Should we just say just pay for all the taxes?"
Taxation Versus Theft
The conversation becomes heated when Brand discusses systems that encourage collective values. Owens translates his argument: "You're talking about theft. When the government comes and demands, yeah I give it to someone else."
Brand objects, claiming Owens is "translating what I'm saying into rhetoric that you can argue with, creating straw men of my words." He clarifies that he's not espousing big government values or saying any current political party represents his views. Instead, he's asking "if in politics both personally and collectively there's room for a little more compassion and love."
Charity and Limited Government
Owens separates the conversation about compassion from government policy. She points out that "Americans give 500 billion in charity every single year." According to Owens, when tax rates are lowered and government stays out of paychecks, people actually give more to charity.
Her argument: "When the government is saying we're going to tax your business, if you're successful you're going to get taxed more, you know what is the incentive for you to want to jump and build a business if you know that you're going to be penalized for it? You're going to be penalized for success."
This leads Owens to explain her work with Turning Point USA, an organization dedicated to teaching conservative principles in school systems. She describes it as promoting "the economic model of letting people find success because they're willing to work hard. If you don't want to work hard you shouldn't be rewarded."
The Question of Value and Worth
Brand pushes back on this framework: "What about the person that doesn't have your drive? Why should economic systems govern the way that we live our lives? Why is there not room for people to be different? Why is it that a person's value and worth..."
Owens interrupts with a fundamental counter-argument about human nature: "In the history of the world there hasn't been some—given some take—you can't make that go away. There's no magic wand that you can wave that's going to make human incentives and what happens in humanity go away. It doesn't matter how rich or how poor society is, there's going to be give, there's going to be take. People are going to create natural markets. Hey I have three apples, I'll give you two apples if you give me this. I mean that it just happens. This is the way the world works."
Finding Common Ground
Despite their fundamental disagreements, Brand acknowledges certain natural impulses "to trade and to cooperate." The conversation, while passionate, remains respectful—a rarity in political discourse between figures with such opposing viewpoints.
Brand's self-awareness shines through when he admits: "Some of my impulses Candace are I just want pleasure and fun and I don't care about anything except myself. That's in me and it's strong. But I personally think I don't feel good when I live that way. There are consequences for me and there are consequences for others."
This admission reveals the heart of their debate: both recognize human selfishness, but they differ fundamentally on how society should be structured in response to it. Owens believes systems should reward individual achievement and allow natural market forces to operate. Brand believes systems should encourage compassion and community, even if that means constraining individual accumulation.
Video Transcript
[00:00] do you like candace owens or do you
[00:01] absolutely detest her do you like me or
[00:03] do you absolutely loathe me wherever you
[00:05] stand on two polarizing figures here we
[00:08] are in conversation now obviously we
[00:10] talk about politics particularly i
[00:13] wanted to press candice owens on the
[00:15] idea that most people that live in
[00:18] systems of elitism and privilege are in
[00:20] those positions because of advantages
[00:22] that have been endowed upon them candice
[00:25] island more of an individualist than i
[00:27] am you might imagine strongly contests
[00:30] my perspective hopefully we remain
[00:33] respectful and light and kind with one
[00:36] another while vehemently disagreeing i'm
[00:39] going to have further conversations with
[00:40] candace aaron so look out for those this
[00:42] conversation took place on my podcast
[00:44] under the skin available on luminary you
[00:46] can subscribe to it there's a link in
[00:47] the description let me know what you
[00:49] think about this conversation in the
[00:50] comments below
[00:52] i agree but do you not think this
[00:54] individualistic culture is in itself
[00:56] destroying the principles at a spiritual
[00:59] human level of community do you not
[01:01] think when people see this economic
[01:03] inequality this disparity i'm not
[01:04] talking about hating your little rich
[01:06] friend lola bell or wherever it was you
[01:08] went around to see her nanny and weren't
[01:10] infuriated by before oh well maybe one
[01:12] day i'll have my own nanny do you not
[01:14] think that economic inequality creates
[01:16] in a human being a sense of injustice of
[01:18] unfairness because people do you know
[01:20] what candice the 90 of people are rich
[01:23] do you know why they're rich they was
[01:24] born rich okay i can tell you something
[01:26] i think that economic disparity creates
[01:28] that feeling but a fundamental
[01:30] understanding in economics do you know
[01:32] that the most people that are rich are
[01:34] born rich it's not like there's a tiny
[01:36] minority of people that are like you
[01:37] that come from a poor background and
[01:39] manage to overcome it and this is what's
[01:41] a problem our problem i've noticed with
[01:42] a lot of great people is they sort of
[01:44] believe that their greatness is
[01:46] something that can be replicated and i
[01:48] don't think it it can i see so i believe
[01:50] in the individual you don't that's what
[01:51] the mental differences but the primary
[01:54] goal of the individual should be to
[01:56] serve the community i i i do not believe
[01:59] that the primary goal of what do you
[02:00] think the problem is that once an
[02:02] individual serves the individual so
[02:04] you're you just you're discounting the
[02:05] human spirit the hebrew i'm saying
[02:07] that's what there is let me ask you no
[02:08] there's not
[02:10] in in
[02:11] humanity think of animals in the wild we
[02:12] even have to go to humanity we can just
[02:14] think about animals in the wild what is
[02:15] our human instinct okay are you going to
[02:17] make sure that everyone on this block is
[02:19] fed before you feed yourself do you go
[02:20] around and say hey have you had
[02:21] breakfast this morning have you had
[02:23] breakfast this morning hey are you going
[02:25] to make sure you're eating and if you
[02:26] have and if you have an excess of course
[02:28] you're going to do the human human
[02:30] condition and our incentives are going
[02:31] to be to want to help are you mortal one
[02:33] the richest 15 people on the planet have
[02:36] got as much accumulative wealth as the
[02:38] poorest five billion but you're that's
[02:40] an excess
[02:42] okay okay excuse me first and foremost
[02:44] you're talking about literally
[02:46] point zero zero zero zero one percent of
[02:48] the world is what you're talking about
[02:50] okay
[02:51] and what and what are they preaching
[02:52] what do they want socialism so that
[02:54] nobody else is the opportunity to become
[02:55] what they've become they're the ones
[02:57] that are pushing creation
[03:00] are you kidding george soros doesn't
[03:02] want socialist policies jeff bezos the
[03:04] richest man in the world doesn't want
[03:05] socialist policies they want to make
[03:06] sure that no one else has the
[03:08] opportunity to get to where they can
[03:09] discuss our language me and you because
[03:11] what we do here's what my socialism
[03:12] looks like
[03:13] take jeff bezos wealth from him except
[03:16] for a reasonable stipend for him to live
[03:18] on something like you know he can have
[03:20] 10 million a year or something tax
[03:22] amazon to the ground so that so so
[03:26] the rich people pay for 85 of all of the
[03:29] taxes you think they should pay for even
[03:31] more
[03:32] do you think that that's that's fact
[03:34] that that's fact yes
[03:35] don't look at me
[03:37] that's a fact the top 10 percent pay for
[03:40] 85 of all the taxes when people say
[03:41] they're going to raise their taxes more
[03:43] i'm just like how much more should we
[03:44] just say just pay for all the taxes i
[03:45] say
[03:46] i say this that there is no when you
[03:49] you're about to use a an example from
[03:51] the natural world and now i'm talking
[03:52] about america by the way i forgot that i
[03:54] mean no i was going to say the instinct
[03:56] when you're in when you're in the
[03:57] natural world is that you feed your
[03:58] family first you're not the idea that
[04:00] social media trying to create goals no
[04:02] longer in the natural world are we we're
[04:04] in a world of sort of accumulation and
[04:06] excess and i don't think it's even
[04:08] working i wonder about sort of you know
[04:10] look i'm
[04:11] i want because you could say where do
[04:12] you draw a line because i'm look at me
[04:14] i've got money now i'm not poor anymore
[04:16] and i'm not going right i'll just take
[04:18] everything that's you know like the
[04:20] thing that i do agree with when i see
[04:21] like sort of right-wing commentators
[04:22] talk like they talk about people that
[04:25] are in a vote of commerce from the left
[04:26] and they go why don't you put some
[04:28] refugees in your house why don't you
[04:29] give up your money and the reason is
[04:31] because people are selfish and in all of
[04:34] us there is a kind of battle between
[04:36] like some of my impulses candice are i
[04:38] just want to i just want pleasure and
[04:41] fun and i don't care about anything
[04:43] except myself that's in me that's in me
[04:46] and it's strong but i personally think i
[04:48] don't feel good when i live that way
[04:50] there are consequences for me and there
[04:52] are consequences for other others so i
[04:54] kind of want to live within systems that
[04:57] um encourage collective and communal
[05:00] values but instead of we're talking
[05:01] about theft no we're not talking about
[05:03] demanding that people give up their
[05:04] stuff as theft but it sounds pretty when
[05:06] you say encourage incentives no when the
[05:08] government comes and demands yeah i give
[05:10] it to someone else
[05:12] you keep translating what i'm saying
[05:14] no you're not helping me
[05:16] he's talking about theft you're
[05:18] translating what i'm saying into
[05:19] rhetoric that you can argue with
[05:21] creating straw men of my words as we go
[05:23] so
[05:25] that that's i'm not saying that i'm
[05:28] saying i'm not saying i'm not espousing
[05:30] the values of big government i'm not
[05:31] saying that there's any political party
[05:33] that currently exists that in any way
[05:35] represents my views i'm just asking if
[05:38] in politics both personally and
[05:40] collectively there's room for a little
[05:42] more compassion and love and whilst i
[05:44] agree with your
[05:46] the uh that there is something easy to
[05:48] fetishize about individual achievements
[05:50] that in your own case or wherever we see
[05:53] greatness we can't take that example of
[05:56] the ability of the individual to
[05:57] overcome adversity to condemn people
[05:59] that haven't been able to like where is
[06:02] there a role then for compassion and
[06:04] kindness i'm not saying there's quite a
[06:05] big government and take away that in
[06:07] politics so my thing is that the
[06:09] conversation could be should be
[06:10] completely separate americans give 500
[06:13] billion in charity every single year
[06:15] okay it has been proven that when you
[06:16] lower the tax rate when you when you
[06:18] government stays out of our paycheck we
[06:20] actually give more that we're inclined
[06:22] to if you have more money and you're
[06:23] able to do it of course you want to give
[06:25] and you want to help when the government
[06:27] is saying we're going to tax your
[06:28] business if you're successful you're
[06:29] going to get taxed more you know what is
[06:31] the incentive for you to want to jump
[06:32] and build a business if you know that
[06:34] you're going to be penalized for it
[06:35] you're going to be penalized for success
[06:37] that's why we believe in limited
[06:38] government when i say we obviously i
[06:39] work for an organization turning point
[06:41] usa oh yeah what's that all about it's
[06:43] it's a you know winning standing point
[06:45] turning point
[06:46] we're launching
[06:48] that's what this whole trip is about
[06:50] you're holding a minute you're launching
[06:52] turning point and like turning point is
[06:53] what what do we you want us to turn to
[06:55] we as conservative principals taught in
[06:57] the school system because the kids are
[06:58] learning this lolly-dolly merry-go-round
[07:00] the world's to be purple and and we're
[07:02] all going to have lollipops in the
[07:03] school systems and then
[07:05] possibly from your podcast i guess i
[07:07] haven't watched enough episodes um
[07:09] it's just not it's it's it's the truest
[07:11] the economic model of of letting people
[07:14] find success because they're willing to
[07:15] work hard if you don't want to work hard
[07:16] you shouldn't be rewarded i don't
[07:18] believe in that i don't believe well
[07:19] what about the person doesn't have your
[07:20] drive why should economic systems govern
[07:23] the way that we live our lives why is
[07:25] there not room for people to be
[07:26] different why is it that a person's
[07:28] value and worth
[07:37] in the history of the world where there
[07:38] hasn't been some given some take you
[07:40] can't you cannot do you can't make that
[07:42] go away there's no magic wand that you
[07:44] can wave that's going to make human
[07:46] incentives and what happens in humanity
[07:48] go away it doesn't matter how rich or
[07:49] how poor society is there's going to be
[07:51] give there's going to be take people are
[07:52] going to create natural markets hey i
[07:54] have three apples i'll give you two
[07:56] apples if you give me this i mean that
[07:58] it just happens this is the way the
[07:59] world works yeah i appreciate that that
[08:01] we have certain
[08:03] natural impulses to trade and to
[08:06] cooperate well if you're enjoying that
[08:08] conversation with candice let me know
[08:09] who you thought made the best points who
[08:11] do you agree with more who do you
[08:12] disagree with for heaven's sake if you
[08:14] want to listen to the rest of it go over
[08:16] to luminary and uh subscribe i do
[08:18] podcasts like this all the time ben
[08:19] shapiro has been on jordan peterson's
[08:21] been on in any event if you enjoyed this
[08:23] video have a look at this one very
[08:24] similar sort of themes and ideas and if
[08:26] you want some well-being spirituality go
[08:28] over to my side channel awakening
[08:30] subscribe to this one subscribe to that
[08:32] one and go over russellbrand.com and get
[08:33] on my mailing list so i can communicate
[08:35] directly with you too thank you
[08:43] you
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.