The Bulwark Sits Down to Reckon With Charlie Kirk's Legacy the Day After His Assassination
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Rebecca Watson Refuses to Mourn Charlie Kirk and Explains Why That Is an Act of Empathy
22:23
Dave Smith and Nick Fuentes Reveal the Truth About Charlie Kirk's Final Stance on Israel
30:01
Due Dissidence Hosts Question Whether Charlie Kirk's Killing Ties to His Break With Israel Allies
11:43
The Bulwark Sits Down to Reckon With Charlie Kirk's Legacy the Day After His Assassination
Sam Stein, managing editor at The Bulwark, sits down with Will Sommer, author of the outlet's False Flag newsletter, recorded the day after Charlie Kirk's assassination. Neither host is treating the moment as an opportunity, they are processing a death that caught them off guard, and Sommer, who had covered Kirk for years, wrote a piece that same day attempting to honestly account for what Kirk built and why it mattered even to those who strongly disagreed with him. Their conversation covers Kirk's early rise as a young Republican activist, the large donors who provided initial momentum, and the formula he pioneered, spectacle conferences, college campus confrontations, and social media fluency, that made him a model for right-wing media figures who followed, including Benny Johnson and Candace Owens, both of whom came up through Turning Point USA. They discuss his dual role as media figure and unofficial White House adviser, a reported phone call from Trump asking Kirk to back off.
Processing the Assassination: Why They Felt It Mattered to Say Something
Sam Stein opens the conversation by acknowledging the difficulty of the moment — recording within hours of Charlie Kirk's death, without yet knowing who committed it or why. He frames the conversation not as a political autopsy but as an honest attempt to account for what Kirk actually represented in conservative politics, including for people who had deep disagreements with him. Will Sommer, who had covered Kirk extensively and published a piece that same day, picks up from there.
The Rise: From Unknown Activist to Turning Point USA
Sommer traces Kirk's trajectory across roughly a decade — from a young Republican activist no one outside conservative circles had heard of to the head of Turning Point USA, a close confidant of the Trump family, and one of the most recognizable faces in right-wing media. He identifies two engines behind that rise: early connections with major donors who provided substantial organizational fuel, and a genuine instinct for making conservative politics feel less stale. Unlike CPAC and the older conference circuit, Turning Point events were built around spectacle — pyrotechnics, big stages, a sense of occasion. Sommer notes that the memorial image Turning Point posted after Kirk's death was a photograph of him standing in front of one of those pyrotechnic displays, which he calls telling.
Crossing Over: Reaching Beyond Conservative Media
What separated Kirk from contemporaries like Ben Shapiro, Sommer argues, was his willingness and ability to operate outside the conservative media bubble entirely. He appeared on apolitical podcasts, built a presence on TikTok and YouTube, and understood that reach outside the base was more valuable than depth within it. Sam Stein frames this as a mastery of the attention economy — recognizing that being present in the conversation at all was what mattered most, and that confrontation was a reliable mechanism for staying there.
The College Campus Model: Content as Strategy
Kirk and Steven Crowder, Sommer says, were among the first to treat college campuses not primarily as persuasion opportunities but as content production sites — showing up, engaging with progressive students, and packaging the resulting footage as the now-ubiquitous "conservative obliterates liberal" format. Stein describes this as a real innovation: confrontation-as-content was not possible at scale until the modern media environment existed to amplify it. Kirk identified that dynamic early and built it into the operational model of Turning Point USA.
The TPUSA Pipeline: Who Came Through and What It Created
Sommer identifies Turning Point USA as a genuine talent incubator for the broader right-wing media ecosystem. Benny Johnson and Candace Owens both worked there and are now among the most prominent figures in conservative media. Beyond them, he describes a large tier of TPUSA ambassador contributors — people Sommer often had not heard of until looking them up, each with six-figure social media followings — who modeled themselves on Kirk's approach. Kirk had real power over what was considered acceptable discourse inside the MAGA movement: being granted or denied a Turning Point platform was a signal about who Trump's orbit viewed as legitimate.
Operative, Adviser, and Media Figure: All Three at Once
When Stein asks how to categorize Kirk — media figure, operative, or politician — Sommer says all three. Kirk never ran for office but was consistently discussed as someone who could have. More concretely, he was simultaneously running a media empire and functioning as an informal adviser to the White House, vetting presidential appointees while holding his own megaphone. Sommer draws a comparison to Sean Hannity but argues Kirk may have gone even further in combining those roles.
The Epstein Phone Call
Sommer recounts an episode he considers illustrative of that dual role: after right-wing media backlash over the closure of the Jeffrey Epstein case, Trump called Kirk directly and asked him to ease off the criticism and help shift the narrative. The detail is presented as evidence of how thoroughly Kirk had integrated into the White House's informal communications operation — not just as a voice that could be managed, but as someone whose influence warranted a direct presidential call.
The Nick Fuentes War and the Groyper Invasion
Stein raises the point that Kirk was not simply a figure with enemies on the left — he had sustained conflict on the right as well. Sommer's account: around 2018, Nick Fuentes, the white nationalist podcaster who commanded his own loyal following known as the Groypers, concluded that Kirk was drawing energy away from what Fuentes wanted to be a more explicitly ethnonationalist movement. Fuentes's followers began crashing Turning Point events, disrupting panels and confronting speakers including Representative Dan Crenshaw. Their core grievance was that Kirk's big-tent approach was too welcoming of legal immigration from non-Western countries.
Shifting Rhetoric to Keep the Audience
Sommer's assessment of how Kirk responded: he folded. Over time, Kirk's rhetoric on immigration shifted in the direction of his critics — away from a broader conservative welcome and toward support for ending legal immigration from what Kirk characterized as third-world countries. Stein frames this as a calculated decision: Kirk understood where the movement was heading and adjusted his stated convictions rather than get left behind. It preserved his audience but represented an abandonment of an earlier position.
The Legacy: A Model No One Has Fully Replicated
Sommer closes by arguing that Kirk's combination of assets is genuinely difficult to replicate. There are right-wing media figures with large audiences, political operatives with institutional power, and fundraisers with access to major donors — but no one has yet assembled all of those things simultaneously the way Kirk did, plus a get-out-the-vote operation at scale, plus the kind of direct White House relationship he maintained. Stein's final note is that the conversation is not an endorsement of Kirk's politics or methods but an honest accounting: by the metrics that matter in political media, what he built was real.
