Up Next
Why I Won't Fly My Flag at Half-Mast for Charlie Kirk Despite His Assassination
12:03
Charlie Sykes and Tom Nichols Dissect Charlie Kirk's Astonishing Historical Illiteracy and Modern Conservative Dysfunction
43:01
Tim Miller Confronts Pastor Doug Wilson on Iran War and Political Christianity on Piers Morgan
17:01
Tim Miller and Jane Coaston Dissect Charlie Kirk's Thought Crime Podcast and the Pipeline Radicalizing Young Conservatives
Tim Miller sits down with Jane Coaston, USC fellow and New York Times contributor, to examine the disturbing evolution of Charlie Kirk's content and its influence on young conservatives. From Thought Crime podcast clips advocating public executions for children to watch, to questioning Taylor Swift's fertility, Miller and Coaston explore how audience capture and intentional radicalization are reshaping the conservative movement. The conversation extends to the dysfunction of the House GOP, Alabama's IVF ruling, and the collapse of principled libertarianism into oppositional defiance disorder. Coaston offers sharp insights on why the culture war populism promoted by figures like Kirk and Tucker Carlson remains disconnected from actual American concerns, yet continues to capture the most engaged conservative audiences.
The Charlie Kirk Pipeline: How Thought Crime Is Radicalizing Young Conservatives
Tim Miller welcomes Jane Coaston, fellow at the University of Southern California and contributing opinion writer to the New York Times, for a wide-ranging conversation about the current state of conservative media, politics, and ideology. The discussion centers on disturbing clips from Charlie Kirk's weekly podcast Thought Crime, where Kirk and other young conservative men share increasingly extreme views on everything from public executions to Taylor Swift's reproductive capacity.
Coaston describes Kirk's content as "a fascinating example of audience capture," explaining how content creators become prisoners of their most extreme followers. She recalls how Kirk's Turning Point USA was confronted by white nationalist groypers a few years ago, and rather than reject them, Kirk gradually shifted his content to accommodate their demands. "Once you have an audience, they don't have you—they have you," Coaston explains, referencing the phenomenon where audiences drive creators deeper into whatever content they produce.
Miller pushes back slightly on the audience capture theory, arguing that there's also top-down audience molding happening. Based on years of attending TPUSA events, he's noticed the questions and concerns of young attendees getting "weirder every year." While this represents a subset of a subset, Miller warns these are the people who will become congressional staffers, state legislators, and potentially Trump administration officials if the former president wins again.
The Myth of Mainstream Conservative Media
The conversation turns to an interview Miller conducted with Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review, where Cooke positioned himself as mainstream and Kirk as fringe. Miller challenges this framing: "The Egghead Republican conservatives are an even tinier group and they're shrinking." He points out that while National Review-style conservatives may find Kirk's content off-putting, there's an undeniable appeal to younger conservatives who want to feel like rebels and contrarians.
Coaston agrees, noting that the new generation of conservatives at TPUSA "figured out oh wait no one cares nobody cares about the three-legged stool and tax policy and limited government and liberty." What sells is culture war content, celebrity gossip, and grievance politics. Traditional conservative intellectual frameworks have been replaced by a form of politics that treats everything as an unsolvable culture war issue perfect for fundraising and media engagement.
House GOP Dysfunction and the Trump Effect
The discussion shifts to Miller's interview with Representative Don Bacon, who described the House Republican conference as containing National Security conservatives, social conservatives, moderate conservatives, and "populists." Miller finds this framing backwards: "The house conference is entirely run by the populists that he was trying to act like were kind of a fringe group."
Coaston observes that House Republicans are in a position where "everyone hates them and yet they have no reason to stop doing the thing that everybody hates." The business of the House has been replaced by generating media content and creating personalities. She argues that culture war is perfect for politicians because "culture wars don't have an end"—there's no policy prescription to fix America's relationship with God, making it an evergreen issue for fundraising and engagement.
Representatives like Dan Crenshaw who want to accomplish legislative goals find themselves trapped. They can't identify Donald Trump and his loyalists as the actual cause of congressional dysfunction without being cast out, so they end up in "permanent angst and frustration," unable to explain why they can't achieve anything. As Coaston notes, Republicans who want to complete tasks keep discovering "this isn't a task completing place, this is a task ignoring place."
The Problem with Tucker Carlson-Style Populism
When discussing Ukraine aid, Miller points to Crenshaw's description of Tucker Carlson as "not even a Republican" but rather a "populist demagogue"—while ignoring that Carlson is on Trump's VP shortlist and Crenshaw is not. This disconnect reveals how mainstream conservative figures refuse to acknowledge what their party has actually become.
Coaston questions whether this even qualifies as populism: "When I think about populism like in the history of American populism, there's like the populist movement of the early 20th century and talking about William Jennings Bryan and farmers." The current version "seems so untethered to the populace that I live around." She points out that ordinary people in line at the grocery store aren't concerned about The Little Mermaid being Black or a background lesbian kiss in a Buzz Lightyear movie.
This "invented populism" creates a movement that claims to represent the working class while Trump sells $9,000 autographed sneakers to Russian luxury watch dealers. The disconnect between populist rhetoric and actual policy becomes obvious when writers talk about expanding the social safety net or supporting unions, while actual Republican politicians "are like actually I don't want to do any of those things at all."
Alabama's IVF Ruling and the Post-Dobbs Reality
The conversation turns serious when discussing Alabama's Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos are people and someone can be held liable for destroying them—a decision that imperils IVF treatment for hundreds of thousands of patients.
Coaston recalls the immediate aftermath of the Dobbs decision leak, when conservative voices tried to downplay the implications. She remembers Kevin Williamson saying abortion laws would just become like France, and Erick Erickson claiming people wouldn't notice changes. "This is the biggest dog catching the car moment in I think American political history," Coaston says, "because it was never just about abortion. It was always going to be about birth control, it was always going to be about IVF."
Having grown up Catholic and spent time in evangelical circles, Coaston is familiar with "snowflake children"—embryos that people adopt and have implanted because "every single embryo is a human life." This belief system has long viewed IVF as problematic because the process requires that some embryos won't be implanted. "For lots and lots of people who have had it, it is a very emotionally challenging time," she explains, noting that many people opposed to abortion rights also use IVF and birth control.
The Alabama ruling reveals what Coaston has long understood: "It's not it's also a decision about IVF, it's also about birth control, it's basically about anything having to do with people having sex with other people in a way that might result in the development of more people."
The Libertarian Party's Collapse Into Purity Spirals
Miller raises a quote from Penn Jillette about abandoning the libertarian label after receiving an email during lockdown inviting him to lead an anti-mask demonstration in Vegas. Jillette's response: "The fact that they sent me this email is something I need to be very ashamed of and I need to change."
Coaston, who left the Libertarian Party around the same time Miller left the Republican Party, explains her journey. She still embraces "small-l libertarianism"—a civic libertarianism that recognizes state power is often wielded against the least powerful. Her work on restrictions to African-Americans regarding gun rights reinforced this perspective.
But the Libertarian Party itself has become problematic for three reasons. First, it's been taken over by the Mises Caucus, which "views popularity as a sign that they are doing something wrong." Second, there's been a purity spiral where Gary Johnson, who got more votes than any libertarian candidate in history, was viewed as a "giant squish" for suggesting driver's licenses might be reasonable. Third, at a moment when more people could have embraced civic libertarianism—after George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Uvalde—the party "decided to double down on things like basically that Putin and Biden are the same person or that we should repeal every civil rights law."
Coaston describes the fundamental tension: "This was a battle between like we could make civic life better for more people or we could argue that it's okay to sell your own children and that actually we should let cops kill more people." The party chose to become "the party of oppositional defiance disorder," and as Coaston notes, "we already have one of those, we don't need another one that's somehow weirder and worse."
Can Ideas Survive Their Practitioners?
Miller poses a final question about whether libertarianism's practical failures suggest something fundamentally flawed about the ideology itself. If every attempt to put it into practice "gets warped into this gross racist oppositional defiance disorder," does that invalidate the core ideas?
Coaston's answer: "Both." She argues libertarianism can influence policy positively—she praises Salt Lake City's relaxed housing zoning that allows apartments next to single-family homes without society collapsing. Libertarian skepticism of "someone should do something" legislation, especially bills with names like "rescue baby bunnies or keep our children safe from evil," remains valuable.
But wielding libertarianism as an all-encompassing ideology is "really a bad idea." You end up in "true libertarianism has never been tried" territory. Libertarianism works best as "a helpful corrective" to state overreach, not as a complete governing philosophy. "There should probably be fewer laws and how those laws are enforced should perhaps be more even and equal," she concludes, "but that's not libertarianism, that's like libertarian—those are two different things to me."
The conversation ends with Coaston's advice: "If a political party really appeals to you, you should probably not join it." Like religious groups that show too much interest in recruiting you, political parties that seem perfectly aligned with your views are probably best avoided. In an age of audience capture, purity spirals, and radicalization pipelines, perhaps the most libertarian position is refusing to be a joiner at all.
Video Transcript
there is an appeal to younger
conservatives who want to be contrarian
who want to be who want to feel like
they're a rebel or whatever and and and
they're getting drawn in down the
Charlie Kirk pipeline not the Charlie
cook pipeline oh that was a good line
that was a really good line I just
pulled it off right off top of my
[Music]
head hello and welcome to the bull
podcast I'm your host Tim Miller and I'm
delighted to be here with my fellow
fellow at the University of Southern
California Jane Cen contributing opinion
writer to the New York Times an on air
contributor to CNN Jane thanks for doing
this thanks so much for having me Tim
thanks for doing this you're on a Linton
Twitter hiatus tell me about that I take
a break every year from Twitter because
Twitter it I feel like it constricts
your mind in such a way I used to tell
someone that like the trick to Twitter
is to only tweet 10% of the things you
think you want to tweet and it's even
better if you just like don't say
anything at all for a long period of
time you know how many times there's a
thing on Twitter and then you try to
explain it to someone who's not on
Twitter and you're like this is just
stupid it's nice to not do that it's
nice to not have a like what is
happening who is this person why are we
all yelling at this one person because
especially now that um Twitter has been
gamified to such an extent like so much
of it is like you have a blue a blue
check mark verification and all you're
just saying is stuff to drive engagement
so people yell at you and you make money
and I'm like I'm not gonna help you make
money no so why are you going back why
are you going back I think um that's an
excellent question and I think that's
because um I'm asking for me really I
am an addict an addict I have a problem
um I'm also on Blue Sky like three
fourths of the conversations on Blue Sky
are like did you see what happened on
Twitter oh my god did you see this
[ __ ] guy this [ __ ] guy said this
[ __ ] thing and you're like we all
transferred out of a high school but we
can't stop talking about that high
school so can I just say though this
makes sense this is something I I've not
tried Blue C this is something that's
frustrating about threads you know the
addictive Char of Twitter is the
fighting the winning and the owning
right and so if you go to a space yes
where you're not fighting and that's
everybody says they want they're like oh
what I really would like is a community
where everybody agrees with me and we
can talk in good faith be good natured
about things and it's like what turns
out that is very boring you know with
without the foes what is what is the
point well it's interesting because blue
sky is a place in which you have
different foes like blue sky is where
all the tankies are so you wind up
having arguments with like hardcore
tanky
leftists and you end up coming out like
you sound like a neocon but it just
because like you are a person who thinks
that maybe Stalin had some downsides um
and like it it's it's a fascinating
place because it's like political
ideologies that you're like I didn't
even know they made those like it's just
like you're a Peruvian
maist you're you're a who like I have to
go back and try to remember like post
1945 political ideological formations to
just be like who are you I will say that
it what you were saying about how people
you know like oh I don't want drama I
don't want to fight or something like
that yes they do and the people who say
that want it the most it's like how um
during this time I've uh decided
apparently to watch all of Real
Housewives of Salt Lake City which is
amazing television in every way but as
with any reality franchise the person
person who says I don't want drama wants
drama they want the most drama they want
to fight they want to fight all the time
and because if you don't want to fight
generally you don't have to say that
like you don't need to clarify that you
do not want to have an argument you just
simply don't have an argument but yes so
the 40 days is good um it's it's funny
though because the first time I did this
was in 2020 so I came back and I was
like oh Global pandemic well there has
been a global tmic way you've been gone
but I am I regret to inform you that
some M much of this podcast will be us
talking about what uh people are doing
on the internet I care deeply about it
I'm fascinated by it I'm convinced it
matters in a way that I haven't yet been
able to truly articulate because um I
wrote a piece in 2020 which I think
still holds up that like Donald Trump
was too online yeah and like we saw this
again with Ronda santis like there's a
degree of being so online that you only
refer to things that happen online and
you think everyone knows what you're
talking about that's bad but there is a
lot you can learn from how people
perform their politics or their culture
online and then they try to take it to
normal people and many times they sound
insane but it's still interesting and
worth talking about well uh this uh
transitions nicely into one of the clips
that I wanted to play for you um when it
comes to what is happening on the online
right I have
become kind of fascinated with um
Charlie Kirk's podcast that airs once a
week called thought crime where it's
just a bunch of bros just a bunch of
white guys talking about some of their
thoughts that maybe shouldn't be said
out loud and yet they're going to say it
out loud every week and if you just if
you just bear with me because I do think
that um it that we both agree on this
that that it's easy and right to laugh
and make fun of them uh about this but
also uh it's disturbingly influential
and pernicious so eron if you don't mind
everybody just bear with us for a
highlight reel of some of my recent
favorites from Charlie Kirk you could
have like brought to you by Coca-Cola
and no I'm not kidding by the way I
would totally tune in to see some petto
get their head chopped off convicted by
a jury years that's no I'm talking about
a real thing I'm talking I'm not talking
executions in b or by firearm that's not
a choice or anything Andrew saying don't
make kids watch it I think no the ab a
certain age an initiation you can drive
you can watch all of a sudden you look
at some of these Savages like in Indiana
there was this guy that went in and
killed a pregnant woman and her three
kids yeah and you know what I want to
watch that execution that'll make my day
better I want to see him on a public
block and get him be publicly executed
and I think that would be Justice you
think children should have you should
see what is the age that at what age
should you start to see public
executions 16 I think
I think you could do it earlier I think
you maybe at age 12 sixth grade or so we
see this where Mass Shooters across the
country who are trans law enforcement is
more interested in using the proper
pronouns than actually finding Justice
or saying this Dispicable person doesn't
deserve our attention who cares what
their pronouns you know what the
pronouns are Savage animal that's the
pronouns and has joelin come out and
said that the wicked trans ideology is
to blame for this no no he has not uh I
have not seen him come out and say
anything other than uh it's unfortunate
what
happened long until uh Taylor Swift and
Travis Kelce are no more over under
Blake like until they're dead I I could
see their suicide fact taking effect not
that one not when the MRN AG altering
shot makes Travis Kelce drop in the
middle of practice that one's way more
fun I'm talking about when will they no
longer be together I don't think they're
together now I think this is all a s up
what what's the goal of the S up Toe
with you you agree Jack that just to
make money she's nasty she's ugly nobody
likes her lik she look like a teenage
boy like dudes don't like her like if
you put her in front of like she's ugly
that's true yeah is does Taylor Swift
have any eggs left I don't think she I
don't know if she had to start
with so to recaping wisdom yeah great
Camp children should watch
executions um Taylor Swift uh I guess
doesn't have any eggs it's too old
Travis Kel's going to Super Bowl
champion is going to die uh from the
fake
vaccine uh what do we I had to cut out
the clip about how we talk too much
about Martin Luther King Day and the
Civil Rights Act uh you know just a lot
of wisdom there um what that just just
kind of rate your level of disturbance
versus desire to give a wedgie after
listening to that I think it's extremely
important to make fun of
giant bad dorks like I think it's very
important like I refuse to respond to
say like neo-nazis marching in Nashville
by being afraid of them like these are
America's biggest dorks and they should
be mocked like imagine hanging on to an
ideology That was supposed to last a
thousand years and lasted for 12 like
come on like it couldn't even make it
into a PG-13 movie I'm not going to be
afraid of these people I fuse and it's
it's also indicative of the fact that
like Charlie Kirk has probably never
really had like an actual group of
friends because all of their
conversations seem like they're trying
to have like normal bro time but it's
like a a normal bro time if you told an
alien what dudes talk about and then he
was like all right I'll interpret it but
like it is concerning to me because I
think that it is a fascinating example
of audience capture um a couple of years
ago Charlie Kirk he was um doing a
college tour for with Turning Point USA
he and I think it was also Donald Trump
Jr was with him and also um Dan Kena
representative Dan kensaw and they were
getting just bered by this grer movement
gers are uh white nationalist followers
of Nick Fuentes one of America's great
dorks um racist awful person anyway so
every event these people would show up
and start screaming like anti-Semitic
conspiracy theories at Charlie Kirk and
at kenon and Donald Trump Jr it was a
giant issue for
tpusa and you've seen over the last
couple of years that Charlie Kirk has
basically decided like you know what I
think they were right they talking about
Israelis celebrating after 911 those
people good points good points and so I
think it's an a really good example of
segmented audience capture like this
doesn't sell like there are not millions
of American who are like you know what I
want to hear more about how Martin
Luther King is a bad person like that's
just not a thing people want but it is
something that a segment of this
audience wants so much that they
overwhelm anyone else and you've seen
that with tpusa they've had to disband
their ambassadors program because their
ambassadors kept being like I think Jews
hate Jesus like I like they kept just
going wilding out on the internet
because I mean I'm sure that they
actually hold these views but also
because the the you know the way
audience capture works and I keep using
that term because I think it's so
interesting there's a great substack on
the subject which is basically that like
once you have an audience they don't you
don't have them they have you and if you
say you're a content creator on YouTube
if you are like all I want to do is cook
sometimes you will wind up like cooking
20 meals a day and doing all these
videos about how you cook 20 times a day
or something like like that like the
audience will drive you deeper into
whatever it is that you're doing and so
if your audience wants to they want to
see more and they want to see bigger
versions of whatever content you create
and I think that what has happened to
Charlie Kirk is that the audience that
he has now is simultaneously people who
hate him and people who desperately want
and will continue to demand more
Fringe red pill racist content they want
to hear about how Taylor Swift is too
ugly to live and they want to hear about
how uh you would not want to get on a
plane with a black pilot like they want
to hear this and so the more that
everyday people everyday conservatives
even are pushed away from this type of
content the more the people who really
like it are like yes yes give me more of
that I will reshare it and retweet and
it's I don't know it's it's sad in a way
it's not like oh I wish Charlie Kirk
could do better cuz I'm like I don't
know if there is a better but it is sad
to me to see that the content has been
driven into this awful well do better
Charlie Kirk I I guess um you know and I
I really should have included the I'm
scared of black Pilots now from that was
a thought crime classic uh from Charlie
Kirk I want to push back a little bit on
one element though I do think some of
this is audience capture but I I also
think that there is audience um molding
that's happening from the top down and I
and I just I base that on having gone
now for many years to various tpusa
events oh yeah I've banned the crowd
yeah and my favorite question oh well uh
luckily they maybe after this podcast
I'll be banned too but uh I I you know
luckily they still welcome me um and the
same question I always ask every kid the
first one I see is why are you here what
animates you besides you know
potentially getting to have some kissy
time with somebody else uh with with a
Maga girl or boy depending on uh the the
proclivities um and the answers have
gotten weirder every
year I just I do have to say like like
they they are self and so I do think
that there's um some you know they're
being molded by this stuff they're being
radicalized to a certain extent and it
is true that that even though this group
is a subsect of a subset they are the
subset that's going to go like work for
Congressman run for State Legislature
you know uh go if if God forbid Donald
Trump wins again like some of these
people are going to be in the Trump
Administration and so that to me that is
the part that makes it like a little bit
more dangerous than just simply audience
capture and like when you say things
like oh these guys are so weird it's not
popular and they're turning people off
it's like yeah that's true but they
might still be popular enough to get get
elected in certain places and to and to
be staffers in certain places and that
like that's pretty alarming I think that
both can be true like yes they are very
connected very disconnected from what
normal people do like I I had a
conversation with someone um Charles CW
cook who writes for National Review um
talking about the like Mega conspiracy
theories around the Super Bowl and he
talked about how these people have a
totalitarian mindset not like stalinist
but the idea that everything should have
to be about politics like you cannot
talk about anything any movie any
sporting event you don't go to sporting
events because you know that unless you
can make it into a political activity I
I think it's particularly telling also
that so much of this has been aimed at
people who are at activities and people
who are generally popular they are also
turned off by normal people talking
about how how cool they are for the fact
that they don't listen to mainstream
music they don't watch mainstream
television they don't watch sports like
they're basically hipsters but way worse
white nationalist hipsters yeah when I
was hipster in college I just listened
to a lot of LCD sound system like these
people just suck and so I do think like
simultaneously I think that audience
capture plays such a big part of this I
also think that that Audi like there's
this symbiotic relationship of telling
your audience that all of your weirdest
[ __ ] is cool and awesome and then your
audience is like we want weirder [ __ ]
and you just keep going back and forth
forever into a world in which you know
if we go full gper you start talking
about how the wor you know the gayest
thing you can do is for a man to have
sex with a woman like you start being so
intentionally off-putting and then
telling yourself that you're offputting
because you're so brave and interesting
no you're just offputting no one likes
it
it it will seep into our political
culture but no one's going to enjoy that
yeah but but some it makes you feel good
I agree it was it was a lot less
pernicious for us hipsters you know
mentioning the fact that we liked you
know name-checking bands that they
haven't heard of like you know the Heat
and Gil Scott Heron and you know David
Axel Rod the artist not not the not the
political strategist like that made us
feel cool okay but it was also really
annoying and so this is my problem the
Charlie cook cook thing though which you
see in that interview is that the
position of the National Review crowd
the M like the the the Republican
Egghead crowd right is that like these
people that we're talking about you know
the cernovich and the and the Charlie
Kirks and people that are out there be
like we can't even watch football
anymore and like it's gone too woke and
I don't like Disney I don't show my kids
Disney and we're only GNA watch Ben
Shapiro movies now like like the the
Egghead Republican class said like when
they talk about it like he is in that
interview with you they're acting like
those guys are the weird minority Fringe
people and like I'm the mainstream and
it's like no Egghead Republican
conservatives are an even are an even
tinier group and they're shrinking and
like there's and as annoying as those
other people are there is an appeal to
younger conservatives who want to be
contrarian who want to be who want to
feel like they're a rebel or whatever
and and and they're getting drawn in
down the Charlie Kirk pipeline not the
Charlie cook pipeline right oh that was
a good line that was a really good line
I just pulled it off right off top of my
head yeah I think that it's it's
interesting because um there have been
intrac conservative battles for pretty
much the entire history of conservatism
and so like the Battle of like who is
the mainstream conservative I think
really gets in the way of thinking about
like what is conservatism mean to any of
these people like Charlie Kirk I he
might describe himself as a conservative
but but he is I mean he's a republican
but I he's not a conservative but like
we get into these like definitional
battles of what any of this means but I
think at least the new generation the
tpusa people have figured out oh wait no
one cares nobody cares about the
three-legged stool and tax policy and
limited government and liberty no one
cares about that they just like what
they want to hear is culture war and
celebrity culture conversations and
talking about how terrible this new
thing is and how much better it would be
if something else happened they figured
out that this sells better and they're
going to keep doing it and people will
keep responding to it and there's no
there's no off-ramp as much as nobody
cares about just like the definitional
fights about the word conservative and
you know the details of that even fewer
people care about that with regards to
libertarianism but we are going to cover
that topic at the end of this podcast
but before we have to do a little bit of
news stuff on the intering fights you
interviewed Doug Don Bacon a little
while ago now but but we have this fight
going on in the house and there was one
thing that struck me from his interview
with you which was he still identifies
in these internight and conservative
fights as um well you know we've got
some National Security conservatives and
we've got some social conservatives and
we've got some moderate conservatives
then we also have this other group over
here called the populists and some of
them have gotten in as well and and he's
like we're all fighting it out and we're
all kind of working through it all this
is a paraphrase of how he described the
house of conference to you and like that
is not right the house conference is is
entirely run by the populists that he
was trying to act like her kind of a
fringe group and then everyone else just
decides to what extent that they want to
go along with them is is essentially how
I see it but I'm curious how you assess
kind of the the power dynamics in the
internal fights in the house
particularly with the upcoming you know
kind of Ukraine fight that is g Ukraine
and Border fight is gonna be happening
well it's fascinating because um the
house House GOP is in this funny
position where everyone hates them and
yet they have no reason to stop doing
the thing that everybody hates people
are furious at them all the time and
it's been fascinating to see how the
fury aimed at them from wide swaths of
movement
conservatism is in no
way moving them past the things that are
making everybody else so mad especially
because Trump is fine with it Trump's
fine with it so like whatever and it is
it's I mean it's been funny seeing
people being like Oh for speaker
McCarthy well like speaker McCarthy is
off like I don't know telling people
weird things about Nancy ma like it is
and mat Gates yeah he's Kevin mccroy is
talking a lot about Matt Gates and Nancy
m his sex life and his retirement I one
that's the worst sentence I've heard in
a really long time two um there's
something that happens to Republicans
once they either like kick down
speakership or retire or something where
they just sudden they like the chattiest
[ __ ] in the history of time like
these are just the messiest [ __ ] they
want to go on the confessional and
they've got a lot to say and um if
you're John Boehner you live your best
life just drinking red wine in
somebody's backyard while selling
marijuana adjacent products through some
other means but I I do think though
that the business of the house has been
ignored for the new business of the
house which is generating media content
and creating
personalities um I've long argued that
culture war is perfect um for certain
politicians because culture wars don't
have an end like there is no way way you
know you can't guarantee an end to a
culture or it's an ongoing issue that
you could always fund raise off of and
you can talk about in such big Strokes
that it's unsolvable like if you think
America has turned away from God there
is not like a policy prescription to get
America back into God you've seen um the
House GOP basically become like they
treat every issue like that they treat
every single issue as if it is a giant
unsolvable moras that they just simply
will not deal with you could say that
this you know this funding really
matters to us we will get it passed you
could do that
or you could not do anything and um yell
a lot which I mean I understand I also
enjoy not doing anything and yelling a
lot but like I'm not a representative
member of Congress yeah it's interesting
because I was listening to your I read
your bacon interview and then I was
listening earlier to interview Dan
crenchaw was doing um with with Jamie
Weinstein um and
I th those are guys that have if they
had their DRS would do something right
they would like to do something if they
had their DWS and yet they're unable to
do anything but they also seem unable to
be able to act correctly identify the
cause of why that can't do anything and
that being Donald Trump and the majority
or strong plurality of Donald Trump
Alkali CEST in their conference because
if they did that then they would be cast
out and so they end up in this like
place of permanent on WE and frustration
right where it's like I can't I want to
do something I can't really do anything
right but I I can't address why I can't
do anything so in these interviews where
they you know sometimes say sensible
things they also end up having to not
you know they can't really explain like
they have to be like well there's Joe B
you know it's like smoking mirrors like
well there's Joe Biden and the Democrats
are also and they've gone and then the
squad is also and right you know and
Congress and DC and you know and here we
are right no it it's interesting because
it it's gotten to the point now where
I'm like why are you here like what is
the point I'm sure that when Mike
Gallagher said to you this week you're
right on going I think it is a very bad
sign that basically every Republican who
is like I would like to complete a task
it's like oh this isn't a task
completing place this is a task ignoring
place that is very telling that there
are so many people who don't want to
deal with this anymore but I I mean I
would argue that I have long said that
if you want to be in Congress or if you
want to be president that's a sign that
you shouldn't be like we should just
randomly assign people to serve in
Congress or as president just be like oh
[ __ ] it's your day sorry and you I've
spoken with representative kensaw before
and I you know some of these people it's
in it's they are so hamstrung by their
purported allies like they have
infinitely better relationships
with Democrats like Cent you Centrist
Democrats that they need to pretend that
they hate and believe are like assassins
of Satan they have so much better
relationships with Democrats than they
do with like House Freedom caucus people
and they need to pretend sometimes
pretend otherwise is fascinating to
watch Republicans get into Congress and
realize that the problem with the
Republican party is Republicans caw's
answer to all this like the you know the
the context around all this is why the
Ukraine thing can't get passed right the
Ukraine for can't get passed and and and
K's like well I mean Tucker I wouldn't
even call Tucker a republican like the
stuff that Tucker is doing is just he's
totally a populist demagogue and and
Jamie Weinstein like replies to me he's
like Tucker is on the VP short list and
I I wanted I'm like screaming into my my
my car at Radio I wanted Jamie to be
like and also mention that you Dan
crenell have no chance to be on the VP
short list because like does shouldn't
that tell you something right like maybe
maybe Tucker is not a classically
liberal Reagan Republican but but a
party is what it is currently
constituted it's currently be like yeah
it's not dreams and wishes this is what
it actually is and there are more people
who are more interested in the Tucker
carlones Embrace of a very specific form
of populism which I I don't I it's to me
I mean I keep this is going to make me
sound like a pretentious [ __ ] but
when I think about populism like in the
history of American populism there's
like the populist movement of the early
20th century and talking about William
Jennings Bryan and farmers and this
populism seems to be so reliant on a
populi that I you know I live in Utah I
know people I'm I'm with the people and
the populism as represented by Tucker
Carlson and some folks seem
so untethered to the populace that I
live around like like why is The Little
Mermaid having to be white a populace I
see the connection when I talk to people
in line at you know Sprouts or something
like that people are not saying that our
big issue is that in the there's like a
background lesbian kiss in the Buzz
Lightyear movie like come on like it's
it's it's fascinating to watch a
populism that seems a completely
unwilling like there's an invented
populism that I see some writers talking
about how like Trump really stands for
the working
class but then you see Trump and he's
like I got sneakers and I'm really mad
about the this depiction of me in some
Meme and it it's fascinating to watch
how so many so many writers are so
focused on this idea of populism among
Republicans like this idea that they
want to expand the social safety net or
talk about unions and then you get
actual Republicans who are like actually
I don't want to do any of those things
at all and Jane I just I have to
interrupt you there because you're just
you're so good at this already at at the
podcast transition that I need to let
you know that when it comes to the
populous sneakers we we just we just
have a little bit of audio for you
you've been off Twitter so I don't know
do you know have you were you aware of
that the popular sneakers incl checked
uh mediaite which is great because it's
like here's everything that you need to
know if you want online [ __ ] News
and I'm like thank you mediaite you're
here for me well for those who have
missed it there was an autograph version
of the popula sneakers and I want to
hear from the winner so what was your
winning
B9 and let's see the signature all right
congratulations congratulations uh
$9,000 bid on the populous sneakers do
you know have you been able to see yet
who the bidder was no I New York Post
New York Post finally comes through this
afternoon Roman sharf the founder and
CEO of luxury watch dealer luxury Bazaar
walked away with the never ending High
uh Never Surrender highs uh he the that
watch maker that watch company Russian a
Russian luxury watch CEO has has won the
winning bid I I mean I think that's
pretty much encapsulates the state of
play yep yep um I I will never forget
how the 2020 campaign turned into a
campaign about boat parades and the
Beautiful boter so yeah that's all um
this all checks out this all checks out
and it's like you know most Americans
don't vote
and those Americans that do have you
know they think about politics in sort
of like an adjacent way unless it's
local like I live in Salt Lake City
where apparently as far as I can tell
one of the big issues is that people are
Furious about gondolas oh my God
gondolas like people they're they want
to put a gondola in Cottonwood Canyon
and people are very mad about it and
then people are mad at the people who
are mad about it and I'm just like what
is gondolas it's all anyone wants to
talk about so like in general people
will be like local issues and then like
that might affect them and then you see
people who are just like the thing that
gets me about kind of culture War style
populism is that it's issues that don't
affect you and you don't live anywhere
near and yet you're like you know
America will fall because some Seattle
school teacher decided to tell somebody
about Angela Davis or something like
that like and it just is telling how how
disconnected that is like that you know
from the Beautiful boers to $99,000 bids
for ugly ass shoes like it is telling
how this movement that was supposed that
we I believe were supposed to believe
was a movement of like some sort of
silent majority is just like it's not a
silent majority it's the really loud
people who own a bunch of car
dealerships in Dayton or a gray Market
luxury watch dealer I do want to
congratulate Roman uh that is good okay
in more serious news um the culture War
uh of absurdity occasionally intersects
with the cultural war of very serious uh
limits on people's rights uh and that uh
happened also this week Alabama Supreme
Court ruled Friday that Frozen embryos
are people and someone can be held
liable for destroying them uh decision
will imperil inv vitro fertilization IVF
uh and affect hundreds of thousands of
patients uh who get treatments like it
um
thoughts well IVF do you think that
where do you where do you what do you
I'll go back to thoughts is my question
I think back to how right after the Dos
decision
leaked there seemed to be and I I would
say I I do not know that there was an
actual literal memo I do know that there
used to be a time at Salem media which
ran a bunch of like uh right-wing radio
shows that they literally would have a
memo go out every day being like don't
talk about this you should talk about
this I do not think that there was a
literal memo in this case but there
seemed to be this Universal thing of
like actually if we overturn Row versus
way that's not that big a deal um right
uh I heard you know um I had a
conversation with Kevin Williamson about
this in which he was like you know this
is going to be we're just going to have
the abortion laws of France which people
have famously always said you know the
pro-life movement has always said we
want french abortion law I remember that
that was a big deal it was the March for
French abortion laws um and I think it
was Eric Ericson who said something like
no people won't really notice it's just
not a big deal um people won't really
notice any changes at
all and as I have said again and again
and again this is the biggest dog
catching the car moment in I think
American political history because and
why I bring this up is that it was never
just about abortion it was always going
to be about birth control it was always
going to be about IVF and reproductive
assistance Technologies I spent you know
I grew up Catholic and spent a long time
in high school trying to be an
Evangelical Christian ineffectively um
and you read a lot about snowflake
children which are embryos that people
adopt because every single embryo is a
human life um every single one and so
you just adopt them and have them
implanted and you have rescued a
snowflake child and I heard how people
talked
about um evf that sounds nice actually
is something wrong with that that sounds
nice well it's if you I mean great if
you would like to do that but it also
indicates to me a general belief that
one IVF is evil because IVF requires
that some embryos will not be implanted
um that
some at some you know IVF is a very
challenging and long and expensive
process um um and I think that for lots
and lots of people who have had it it is
a very emotionally challenging time as
well because you have to have
discussions like which embryo will we
implant and how will this work and what
does this look like and there has long
been a strain of specifically among
social conservatives about saying like
all of this is evil and awful and all of
this is bad because at some point a if
you believe that these embryos are
equivalent to babies that you are you
basically have to murder a baby as a
matter of course in order to go through
IVF
and you you see that with uh people
fighting against uh birth control the
idea that birth control is a form of
murder because it stops the uh
fertilized egg from implanting in the
uterus that's not how any of this works
but if you spent a lot of time in
anti-abortion pro-life circles you knew
it wasn't just about abortion it was
about anything and everything that has
to do with sex at all and so it is
interesting to me that right after dos
came out you could see a bunch of people
within social conservative circles
seeing the writing on the wall that like
this thing that we want this thing we
want so badly we have not 100% told
everyone what it would mean for millions
of other people even the people who are
very opposed to abortion people who are
opposed to abortion rights get IVs
people who are I have plenty of those
people in my life yeah so have I lots of
people have you know and probably even
more people who oppose abortion have
also used birth control and you're
starting to see a narrative in certain
conservative Publications talking about
how women are starting to reject birth
control and then um I think it was
Charles Layman who of the Manhattan
Institute was like no they aren't what
are you talking about like pulling out
stats but like you can see the narrative
start building about like re you know
enforcing The Comstock laws about
sending information about birth control
via the mail like you can see where this
comes from and so I always think back to
how do you know the leak of the dobs
decision was talked about as being you
know a five alarm alarm fire uh for
liberals and um reproductive Justice
Advocates but among conservatives there
generally was this idea of like like sh
don't talk about it right you can see
you know based on Alabama you can see
that if you are thinking about this as
as Jobs is just an abortion decision
it's not it's also a decision about IVF
it's also about birth control it's
basically about anything having to do
with people having sex with other people
in a way that might result in the
development of more people and I think
that that is it's really interesting to
see how people are reacting to that and
I think it it will always be deeply
telling for me how the among the first
reactions to the end of row was people
trying to people trying to tell other
people that it'll be just like France
the Alabama and France don't have a lot
in common hostility to laws that um are
going to limit F's ability uh to do IVF
is one good thing about being a
Libertarian you were once a Libertarian
I was you left the libertarian party I
did right around the same time I left
the Republican party I think I actually
beat you to the punch um if if we're
looking at the Timeline oh man you Irish
goodby before I did uh yeah I think I
think I just I got right under the wire
on that substack post um but uh I I I
saw a quote from pen Gillette and I was
like I have to talk to Jane [ __ ] about
this like uh you're my number one person
to talk to because P pen would had been
a prominent libertarian he'd go to
libertarian party functions and You' see
him doing libertarian speeches and stuff
and and he said this in an interview
recently I've use the word libertarian
in describing myself since I got an
email during lockdown when a person from
a Libertarian organization wrote to me
and said we're doing an anti-mask
demonstration in Vegas and obviously
we'd like you to head it now pen I
looked at that email and I went the fact
that they sent me this email is
something I need to be very ashamed of
and I need to change um boy I just I
love that I love anything that that has
self-reflection at that level um and so
I'm just I was just wanting to hear kind
of your reaction to that in your journey
and how you assess kind of libertarian
stuff these
days um well it it's challenging because
I think that many people I would argue
are small L Libertarians now granted
because many people are small L
Libertarians for themselves and not for
other people um right and we all do this
like you everybody had I I wrote about
this years ago that everybody has like
if I break laws it's fine if you break
laws you should be shoted um right but I
think that for me
libertarianism meant a Civic
libertarianism a libertarianism that
said that like the power of the state
can and is often used for bad purposes
um I think especially the more work I
did thinking about um restrictions to
African-Americans with regard to gun
rights thinking about the way that
states and state power can be wielded
against against the least powerful um I
think I still Embrace a Civic small L
libertarianism the problem for me with a
Libertarian party is okay it's manyfold
but I'll stick to three things
one they view right now they have been
taken over by The Mizz caucus and The
Mizz caucus views popularity as they
sign that they are doing something wrong
um this was in response to to uh I think
that there was some talk about RFK
running as a Libertarian which would be
hilarious because RFK is the least
libertarian person to ever live um in
many respects for good and for ill and
the comment from if I remember correctly
the comment from the MZ caucus was you
know we would never do this we would
never let him use our name when Gary
Johnson ran and Gary Johnson run as a
Libertarian in um 2016 I interviewed him
twice um he told me that he was 50% %
Hillary Clinton and 50% Donald Trump I
believe no he was 50% Donald Trump and
50% Bernie Sanders so everyone should
love him and I thought to myself that's
not how that works but he got more votes
than any libertarian candidate in
history and many Libertarians viewed him
as being a giant squish because he said
things like maybe you should use a
driver's license and
like there is a purity spiral the
libertarian party has been in for I
think probably the
past seven eight years and in a moment
in which I think more people could have
embraced Civic
libertarianism especially after not just
after the summer of 2020 and the murder
of say Ahmed Arbury and George Floyd but
after Uvaldi after seeing a bunch of
cops who literally were like should we
go in and stop this person killing
children or should we stand here and do
nothing and then punish the people who
tried us make us do things we will
choose the latter and you actually saw a
lot of people being like I didn't know
cops did this like if this is is this
why people are so mad at the police and
like every Civic Li you I'm sure Bradley
Bal somewhere was like yeah
yeah but you know and I think that that
was something that was a moment in which
a Libertarian party could have a version
of the libertarian party that doesn't
exist could would have really embraced
that instead the libertarian party has
rejected the mainstream kind of similar
to our earlier conversation and they've
decided to double down on things like um
you know basically that Putin and Biden
know the same person or that we should
uh
repeal you know every civil rights law
and uh we should make it IL illegal for
LGBT people to be teachers um um lots of
stuff about like repealing the 19th
Amendment so that women don't vote uh
they responded to a moment in which more
people were looking for libertarian
ideas by saying no what we're going to
give you is our sh racist
views and I think that that's something
I mean that's the thing that struck me
and I think that my third point is like
this was a moment in which I didn't know
enough about the thing and yet I signed
up which is like almost every
Subscription Service I have and yet I
did this for my political party like I
think that I had an idea that I was
really irrit you know I didn't was not
going to become a Republican and I was
really displeased by how Democrats were
viewing the role of state power um
basically saying you know in like give
all us all of the Power and being like
no maybe NE no none of you should be
able to do any of this and the
libertarian party to me was like ah this
is an option for you I read reason like
I this was an option for people who were
interesting and thoughtful and wanted to
be kind of to make a statement about how
there was another choice to be made this
idea within libertarianism has always
you know to me and obviously I don't
know everything clearly but it seemed to
be this battle between like we could
make Civic life better for more people
or we could argue that it's okay to sell
your own children and that actually we
should let cops kill more people because
those people just don't deserve to be
alive and it's like what and so I think
that for me I mean I think that it goes
to um what pend that talking about how
when you know it's not about government
enforcing mask policies it's about
having an anti-mask rally because you
just hate masks and I think that that
was something where it's like
this has nothing to do with government
enforcing anything this has to do with
like we just don't like it and like
becoming the party of we just don't like
it like becoming the party of
oppositional Defiance disorder like we
already have one of those we don't need
another one that's somehow weirder and
worse well this is my like final
question this is the thing that I kind
of I meditate on this with regards to
Republican stuff and and a bunch of
things if there's no practical
implication where something works then
maybe there's something fundamentally
flawed about it I mean and that's I do
wonder that about libertarianism right
like if because I you know I I there's a
lot of appealing things to me about
libertarianism I I considered myself a
Libertarian Republican at one point yeah
um and uh you know and but the question
is if you cannot if anytime something is
uh is put into practice it it gets
warped into this like gross racist
oppositional Defiance disorder you know
group then does that say something about
the idea at its fundamental level or can
the idea still be pure but it's the
people who are about
um both I think that there are ways in
which libertarianism can influence
policy in good ways like I think that
for instance having a Loosey Goosey
approach to say housing zoning is great
um something I really like about Salt
Lake City is that as far as I can tell
if you would like to build housing in a
place and you're like not you know it's
not federal land or something like that
and you want to build a single family
home or a multif family domain fine go
nut so you actually have in my
neighborhood you know you have an
apartment building next to a single
family home and people don't explode
like people have not like you know
started committing murder in the streets
or something like that I do think like
there are ways in which libertarianism
can influence policy for good but I do
think that using that wielding
libertarianism itself and attempting to
make that an all-encompassing
ideology I think is really a bad idea I
mean I think that you know you wind up
in that kind of true libertarianism has
never been tried kind of thing of like
ah you know if it weren't for these you
know if only the little father knew
about how great it would be if I don't
know we all lived free and died harder
or something but like I do think that
libertarianism can be a
helpful corrective like so many people
do the um you know won't somebody take
care of the kids or someone should do
something like the someone should do
something about that impetus is
generally bad and I think Libertarians
are generally correct on that front when
it's like hey that bill that says it's
going to keep our children safe it
probably won't keep our children safe
it's probably bad any bill that's named
about like rescue baby bunnies or keep
our children safe from evil or something
it's probably bad yeah like there should
probably be fewer laws and how those are
laws are enforced should perhaps be more
even and equal but I think that that
that has not that's not libertarianism
that's like libertarian those are two
different things to me um this is all to
say that if a political party really
appeals to you um you should probably
not join it you should probably if if
something appeals to you directly don't
do it whatever it is like it's sort of
like how um no no need to be a joiner no
don't join things it's sort of like how
like if a religious group is like super
interested in you don't join it nope
nope nope anyone who's interested in you
stay away I love an individualist ethos
is a wonderful way to end this podcast
Jane you are just a pleasure I don't
know we could probably do a full two two
hours on on on libertarianism sometimes
so when when you're just bored in Salt
Lake and you're just like hey I want to
just spend my afternoon just look
anytime you know where to find anytime
absolutely anytime thank you so much for
having
[Music]
me