Up Next
Jordan Peterson Debates 25 Atheists on God, Morality, and What Atheists Reject Without Understanding
1:28:44
George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe: America's First Five Presidents
32:52
Why America's Christian Founding Is an Undeniable Historical Fact Despite Modern Revisionism
5:35
The Top Five Myths About America's Founding Fathers That Your Teacher Got Wrong
America's Founding Fathers have been systematically misrepresented in modern education and media. From claims that they were merely deists to assertions that they modeled democracy after Native American tribes, these narratives ignore documented historical evidence. The Continental Congress cited the Bible more than any other source, proclaimed national days of prayer in Jesus Christ's name, and designed a constitutional republic specifically for a moral people. This examination of primary sources, congressional records, and the Founders' own writings reveals a deliberate pattern of historical revisionism that contradicts the clear intentions and beliefs of the men who created the American system of government.
The Biblical Foundation of American Government
The claim that America's Founding Fathers were deists rather than Christians represents one of the most persistent myths in modern education. However, a comprehensive joint study by professors from Indiana University and the University of Houston analyzed 15,000 writings by 55 framers of the Constitution and found that the Bible constituted approximately 34% of all attributable quotes in the Founding Fathers' writings—more than any other source by a significant margin.
The Continental Congress's official proclamations were explicitly Christian. In 1774, the first prayer of the Continental Congress concluded: "All this we ask in the name and through the merits of Jesus Christ, thy son and our savior." Benjamin Franklin, often cited as a prime example of a deist Founder, recommended in 1787 that the Constitutional Convention open with prayer, stating: "I have lived, sir, a long time and the more I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?"
Throughout the Revolutionary War, Congress proclaimed days of fasting and Thanksgiving annually. The 1776 proclamation asked citizens to "confess and bewail our manifold sins and transgressions and by a sincere repentance and amendment of life appease his God's righteous displeasure and through the merits and mediation of Jesus Christ obtain his pardon and forgiveness." The 1777 Thanksgiving proclamation similarly referenced "the merits of Jesus Christ" in asking God to "mercifully forgive and blot them out of remembrance."
The Founders' Views on Slavery
The second major myth suggests that the Founding Fathers wholeheartedly supported and endorsed slavery. While slavery was practiced during their time, the historical record shows the Founders recognized the institution needed to be reconciled with their Christian principles.
George Washington wrote in 1786: "There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for this abolition of slavery." Benjamin Franklin called slavery "an atrocious debasement of human nature" in 1789. John Adams stated in 1819 that "every measure of prudence ought to be assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States."
The Founders understood slavery contradicted their Christian beliefs and the principles they were establishing. In many instances, legal restrictions prevented slave owners from freeing enslaved people until their death. The suggestion that modern commentators have somehow discovered moral truths that escaped these men ignores their documented writings and the legal constraints of their era.
The Truth About Separation of Church and State
Perhaps the most misunderstood concept regarding the Founding Fathers involves the phrase "separation of church and state," which does not appear in the Constitution. The myth claims the Founders intended strict separation in the modern secularist sense.
The historical reality contradicts this interpretation. The First Congress approved the First Amendment and a national day of prayer to almighty God on the same day. Between April and May 1789, the government hired and paid chaplains for daily opening prayers in both the House and Senate. On September 25, 1789, the final Bill of Rights language passed, and the following day the Senate concurred with a Thanksgiving prayer resolution that President Washington issued as a proclamation.
The same Congress that wrote the First Amendment also funded military chaplains, Indian missions, and Bible distributions. The Supreme Court addressed this historical context in Marsh v. Chambers (1983), stating: "It can hardly be thought that in the same week members of the First Congress voted to appoint and to pay a chaplain for each house, and also vote to approve the draft of the First Amendment for submission to the states, that they intended the Establishment Clause of the Amendment to forbid what they had just declared acceptable."
The phrase "separation of church and state" comes from a private letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists. The Founders' clear intention was to prevent establishment of a national denomination, not to exclude God from public life. Their actions demonstrate they proactively incorporated Christian principles and practices into government operations while ensuring no single denomination would be enforced.
The Native American Democracy Myth
A fourth myth claims the Founders modeled their representative government after Native American democratic systems, specifically the Iroquois Confederacy. This narrative lacks historical foundation.
The Iroquois Confederacy was a defense agreement between tribes, not a democracy. Native American tribes did not practice democracy in the form recognized by the American system. Members of various tribes fought against each other on both sides of the American Revolution, which contradicts the notion of a unified democratic model.
The Founders looked to classical sources like Rome and Greece for inspiration. The Federalist Papers were written under the pseudonym "Publius," referencing one of the founders of the Roman Republic. The extensive references to classical political philosophy in the Founders' writings demonstrate where they drew their ideas about representative government.
Universal Suffrage and One Person, One Vote
The fifth myth suggests the Founding Fathers believed in universal suffrage and intended a "one person, one vote" system. Historical records show the opposite was true.
At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, universal suffrage was not under consideration. The debates centered not on whether to expand voting rights universally, but specifically on how to restrict voting to ensure a representative government that reflected those who could build, serve, and sustain the country.
John Adams articulated this position clearly: "The doctrine of universal suffrage is so manifest a courtship to the mob as to need no comment. But it never can succeed for any length of time. These good creatures never look forward for two days. The mob must ever be in the power of government, government never in the power of the mob. Property is universally and eternally irreconcilable with universal suffrage."
Adams continued: "It is dangerous to open so fruitful a source of controversy and altercation as would be opened by attempting to alter the qualifications of voters. There will be no end to it. New claims will arise. Women will demand a vote. Lads from 12 to 21 will think their rights not enough attended to, and every man who has not a farthing will demand an equal with any other in all acts of state. It tends to confound and destroy all distinctions and prostrate all ranks to one common."
Adams deliberately listed various groups—women, young men, and those without property—to illustrate his point about limiting the franchise to those with "skin in the game." His concern was that those who did not contribute to the system should not be able to vote themselves benefits from those who did contribute. This position was intentional, proactive, and repeatedly stated throughout the founding documents and debates.
The Pattern of Historical Revisionism
These five myths share a common characteristic: they directly contradict primary source documents, congressional records, and the Founders' own extensive writings. The Founding Fathers addressed these issues repeatedly and explicitly, leaving little room for misinterpretation.
The Founders were Christians who believed America could only function as a constitutional representative republic adequate for a free but moral and Christian people. They designed a government to represent those who could create, sustain, and fight for a meaningful country. They were flawed men who understood their need for God, which is precisely why they built the representative republic they did.
The misrepresentation of the Founders' beliefs and intentions is not a matter of honest misinterpretation or innocent mistakes. The historical record is too clear and too consistent for these errors to be accidental. When educators and commentators claim the Founders were deists, supported slavery without reservation, intended strict secular government, modeled democracy after Native Americans, or desired universal suffrage, they are not making interpretive errors—they are contradicting documented historical facts.
Video Transcript
[music]
[music]
[music]
[bell]
[music]
>> Some people have a deep abiding respect
for the constitutional law that created
this country.
>> [music]
>> And some people don't.
Psychos started liberalism.
Mug Club can stop it.
>> [music]
>> Click Rumble Premium and join now for
$0.99 annually or $9.99 a month to get
the entirely ad-free experience and an
ever-expanding roster of content,
creators, and free speech.
It's that time of year again.
July.
A time for patriotism,
giving, generosity, a cheerful heart, or
hating your country and justifying it by
perpetuating myths, lies,
uh outright propaganda. Today, we're
going to go through the top five most
common myths about the Founding Fathers
and why you don't need to hate them in
the way your teacher told you.
>> Some of the Founding Fathers may have
been LGBTQ.
>> The Founding Fathers were racist,
misogynist jerk faces.
>> Everything Epstein did, the Founding
Fathers did 2 and 1/2 centuries ago.
>> Why the Founding Fathers actually suck
and were shitty revolutionaries.
>> And surely this isn't what the Founding
Fathers intended.
>> As it turns out, Kathleen, yes, it is.
>> That's because the foundation of America
was built on racism. Everybody knows
that.
>> Can you imagine our reading that James
Madison or Thomas Jefferson tried to
overthrow the government?
>> Right off the top before I get to myth
one as we do every show when we stream
daily at 11:00 a.m. right now we're on
break 11:00 a.m. Eastern we stream daily
we make the references publicly
available we give you a bibliography all
of our sources every day link in the
description so you can peruse them and
figure it out for yourself. Let's get
straight to it. Myth number one.
Very common you've heard this it's
almost uh
simply accepted as fact even though that
couldn't be further from the truth that
the founding fathers
they weren't really Christians they were
at most they were deists.
>> Did you know many of America's founding
fathers weren't Christian? They were
deists.
Leaders like Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin
Franklin, Thomas Paine believed in God
but not in organized religion.
>> Christian nationalists um like to pull
out quotes from the founding fathers who
are using religion for social order or
tradition and then saying we are a
Christian nation when really these are
men of reason. They are deists before
Darwin uh just on pure you know reason
and rationality alone.
>> To say the US was founded on
Judeo-Christian values not only fails to
capture the diversity of religious
thought in the 13 colonies it passes
over the influence of deism.
>> Before I get to an important timeline
here
let me establish the reality.
The Bible is the single most cited book
in all of the founding fathers writings.
It's not even close.
There were studies a joint study by
professors from Indiana University,
University of Houston
and this study analyzed 15,000 writings
by 55 framers of the Constitution. They
found that the founding fathers cited
the Bible by far more than any other
book in their writings, making up
approximately 34%
of all attributable quotes to our
founding fathers. There isn't even a
distant second. Here's another reality.
The Continental Congress's own official
proclamations were explicitly,
repeatedly,
almost redundantly
Christian.
Let's go to 1774, the first prayer of
the Continental Congress.
Preserve the health of their bodies and
vigor of their minds. Shower down on
them and the millions they here
represent such temporal blessings as
thou ceased. We don't use that term
anymore, but it's a fun one. Ceased
expedient for them in this world and
crown them with everlasting glory in the
world to come. All this we ask in the
name and through the merits of Jesus
Christ, thy son and our savior.
He may want some wiggle room here and
say, "Well, what did they mean by thy?"
To whom I'll just go with God? Jesus
Christ is thy son, God's son, but that's
an interpretation.
Let's go to Benjamin Franklin, often
cited as a deist. His call for prayer in
1787.
He actually recommended, and this was
famously so, although for some reason
it's not often taught in schools, that
the Constitutional Convention open with
prayer. The deist, Benjamin Franklin. He
said, "I have lived, sir, a long time
and the more I live, the more convincing
proofs I see of this truth that God
governs in the affairs of men. And if a
sparrow cannot fall to the ground
without his notice, is it probable that
an empire can rise without his aid?"
Let's go to 1776, Congress
proclaimed days of fasting and
Thanksgiving annually throughout the
Revolutionary War, asking all citizens
to confess and bewail our manifold sins
and transgressions and by a sincere
repentance and amendment of life appease
his God's righteous displeasure and
through the merits and mediation of
Jesus Christ obtain his pardon and
forgiveness.
Still not convinced? 1777, Congress's
Thanksgiving proclamation. They may join
the penitent confession of their
manifold sins whereby they had forfeited
every favor and their humble and earnest
supplication that it may please God
through the merits of Jesus Christ
mercifully to forgive and blot them out
of remembrance. For instance, yeah,
deists who seemed very adamant about
marrying the concept of God, capital G,
to thy son, Jesus Christ. But, you know,
they weren't religious, they were just
spiritual, like a sorority girl. By the
way, I know we're on break right now. If
you want to tune in and see more of
this, we'll be back 11:00 a.m. Eastern
Monday through Friday. That's when we
live stream and we always provide the
references. Happy 4th. Let's go on to
myth number two.
And this is one that is used very often
if people accept the premise,
okay, they were Christians, now we need
to discredit them.
Well, the founders, it doesn't really
matter because
how how could they be Christians? They
wholeheartedly supported, endorsed, and
practiced slavery.
>> It's a an embarrassing thing to admit,
but the people who wrote the
Constitution did not understand that
slavery was a bad thing and did not
respect civil rights. The document they
produced
was eventually signed,
but ultimately unfinished.
It was stained
by this nation's original sin of
slavery.
>> Our country was not founded on the
principle that
all people are created.
It was founded at the expense of the
lives,
freedoms, and well-being of black
people, African folks who they stole.
>> What is unique, no, chattel slavery was
not unique to the United States. But
what was unique was that we practiced
chattel slavery while saying and
professing these beliefs in equality and
universal rights of men.
>> So, here's the reality.
The founding fathers knew that they had
to reconcile slavery. Knew that
something was going to need to change
precisely because of the fact that they
were God-fearing men. Slavery was the
norm.
Took a while to change it. Let me give
you some direct quotes. Again, check the
references. 1786, this is George
Washington.
There is not a man living who wishes
more sincerely than I do to see a plan
adopted for this abolition of slavery.
1789, Benjamin Franklin again. Slavery
is an atrocious debasement of human
nature. 1819, John Adams. Every measure
of prudence ought to be assumed for the
eventual total extirpation [snorts] of
slavery from the United States.
This tells you how dishonest and or
arrogant the left is.
Took a while to fix. Yes, slavery was
practiced. Many instances, you couldn't
free your slaves legally until your
death.
Imagine
thinking that these guys hadn't figured
it out, had never given it any thought,
and Pete Buttigieg is the one to
enlighten humanity.
Thank God for him in Traverse City. Myth
number three.
This is a very common one.
And uh you'll actually hear people
sometimes
quote separation of church and state as
though it's in the Constitution. So,
this myth is pretty much the founders
intended very strict separation of
church and state
specifically in what you know as the
modern secularist sense.
>> You can't have a discussion like this
without talking about the founders and
what they personally believed. But
really, I think that that's largely
irrelevant to the central question. Are
we a Christian nation founded on
Judeo-Christian principles? Because even
if they were Christians, Bible-beating,
Jesus rose from the dead Christians,
that doesn't necessarily mean that they
founded the nation on Judeo-Christian
principles.
>> Well, they founded it on a godless and
entirely secular constitution, so their
religion was irrelevant.
>> Exactly. And that's the that's the
critical fact. So, even if they are
Christian, which I think you can't make
that case
convincingly, we know that they built a
nation that was entirely secular and in
which state and church were meant to be
separate.
>> For all the baggage that
new media, social media comes with,
these instances, this is where it really
shines. People like that used to be able
to get away with, you know, if you
really want to believe they were
Bible-beating, like Jesus rose from the
dead, Christian. You mean Christian?
You want to go back to Jefferson,
Franklin, George Washington, who
specifically cited Jesus Christ, thy
son, repeatedly, more than any other
book, the Bible reference? This brings
us to the reality.
The first Congress approved the First
Amendment and a national day of prayer
to almighty God in the Jesus Christ
contextual sense
on the same day.
The reason that matters
is because
they're trying to make you believe
that they've caught something the rest
of us have missed. The Founding Fathers
didn't miss it.
You may not agree with them on
everything.
But to suggest that they are so idiotic
as to approve the First Amendment and a
national day of prayer to almighty God
on the same day
without understanding the implications
is to be intellectually dishonest. Let
me give you a timeline. 1789,
April through May,
uh also our government hired and they
would pay chaplains for House and Senate
daily opening prayers.
Uh then September 25th, the final Bill
of Rights language was passed and that's
where you had Boudinot's Thanksgiving
prayer resolution. September 26th, the
Senate concurs, and Washington issues
the proclamation.
They meant No, and I've talked about
this. Thomas Jefferson writing in a
private letter to the Danbury Baptists.
You know, you do have to read some of
the
supportive text, as you do with, by the
way, any historical event, context, or
even religion,
to give you a better picture. They were
very clear that they didn't want a
national denomination to be enforced.
There was never the intention to keep
God out of public life. As a matter of
fact, the opposite of that. That's why
they declared a national day of prayer
on the same day as the First Amendment.
You're talking about the same Congress,
by the way. Just for more context, that
funded military chaplains, the Indian
missions,
Bible distributions,
while they were writing no
establishment, while they were writing
the First Amendment. These things were
happening
at the same time. They didn't miss it.
And other people,
before podcast hosts or think tank
fellows,
didn't miss it, either. That's why you
go to the Marsh vs. Chambers Supreme
Court decision in 1983. The Supreme
Court affirmed all this in a case
regarding the constitutionality of
opening legislative sessions with
prayers, when it stated, "It can hardly
be thought that in the same week members
of the First Congress voted to appoint
and to pay a chaplain for each house,
and also vote to approve the draft of
the First Amendment for submission to
the states, that they intended the
Establishment Clause of the Amendment to
forbid what they had just declared
acceptable."
And that's actually pretty soft
language. They didn't declare it
acceptable.
They effectively codified it.
It was proactive,
not reactive.
Myth number four.
I can't believe that anyone still tries
to force this one upon you, but they do.
The idea that the founders actually
modeled their representative government
after the Native American model.
>> Long before 13 British colonies made
themselves into the [music] United
States, the six nations of the Iroquois
Confederacy, Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga,
Tuscarora, Oneida, and Mohawk had
created a union of their own that they
called the Hodenoshonee, a democracy
that had flourished for centuries.
>> Ugh.
Here's the reality.
Um
No, of course Native Americans
did not practice democracy. Certainly
not in the way that you know it unless
it includes scalping and burning alive.
I know you'll say, "Oh, we scalp too."
No, no, not the way that they did. So,
really the claim there that they're
trying to reference is referring to the
Iroquois Confederacy, which was a
defense agreement between tribes. It was
not, in fact, a democracy. For more
proof, you need to look at the fact that
members of tribes fought against each
other on both sides of the American
Revolution.
What do you think they
they voted to which sides they would
fight each other and kill each other?
No, it it it this defies reason,
obviously.
The founders looked to, not Native
Americans, places like Rome, Greece for
inspiration. The Federalist Papers were
written under the pseudonym Publius,
one of course the founders of the Roman
Republic, not Sitting Bull.
Speaking of which, if you have problems
with regularity or you feel that your
body maybe isn't just working as well as
you'd like, this is the only other
company I've ever created or owned,
Foundation, a daily multivitamin with
clinically effective ingredients at
their clinically effective doses. You
can go and check all of the research
right there on foundationdaily.com as
well as
lab lab test certificates of analysis
for every single batch sold. If you
exercise, eat perfectly, and feel great,
have no aches and pains, you know what?
You may not need it. If you want the
best multivitamin in the world, and you
think that your brain, your joints could
use a little bit of help, there's
nothing better out there than
Foundation. The ingredients alone would
cost you about $150 a month. I've been
taking all of these ingredients myself
as individual supplements for about 15
years. Struggle with chronic pain is a
genetic condition. You can get it all in
one bottle. Uh become a subscriber, get
40% off for life. Go to
foundationdaily.com.
It does not cure cancer, and it won't
grow 20 lb of muscle, which brings us to
myth number five.
That the founders believed in universal
suffrage, and they wanted a one person,
one vote system.
>> Make no mistake, our democracy is being
tested in this election.
This is a stress test of the ideals upon
which this country was founded. And the
basic rule of one person, one vote,
that still carries, and it has to carry
here.
>> One person, one vote.
>> Everything about the Constitution and
the design of America from the very
beginning until today points in one
direction, which is one person, one
vote, which means everybody gets equal
power. We're It's It's It's a It's the
other It's the colloquial term for
political equality, meaning that
everyone is politic Everyone is a
political equal. Everyone is equal at
the ballot box.
>> Okay. [snorts]
Here's the reality.
Um
not only did the Founding Fathers never
intend for everyone to vote,
they were very clear that not everyone
should vote. And pure democracy would
effectively be tearing down the country
that they created. This is a
representative, a constitutional
republic,
which is meant to represent those who
can build, sustain, and keep a country.
They were actually discussing, if you
look at the 1787 the Constitutional
Convention, not only was universal
suffrage not on the table,
the opposing sides on the voting issue,
they were debating exactly how to
restrict voting.
Whether to expand it was not on the
table. It was specifically how do we
restrict it so that we can have a
representative government that is most
representative of those
who can serve, build, and sustain this
country. John Adams
actually stated this. He said,
>> "The doctrine of universal suffrage is
so manifest a courtship to the mob as to
need no comment."
>> Then he goes on to give a comment. I
love it when they do that.
>> "I will not waste my time, sir."
>> How much do you have? Um he goes,
"But it's never can succeed for any
length of time. These good creatures
never look forward for two days. The mob
must ever be in the power of government,
government never in the power of the
mob. Property is universally and
eternally irreconcilable with universal
suffrage. It is dangerous to open so
fruitful a source of controversy and
altercation as would be opened by
attempting to alter the qualifications
of voters. There will be no end to it.
New claims will arise. Women will demand
a vote. Lads from 12 to 21 will think
their rights not enough attended to, and
every man who has not a farthing will
demand an equal with any other in all
acts of state. It tends to confound and
destroy all distinctions and prostrate
all ranks to one common." Now, I know
people who are perpetually offended will
take that and go, "Well, you you can't
take what he said seriously. He doesn't
think that women should have a vote."
We've [snorts] done installments on
specifically women voting, universal
suffrage. Keep in mind the context, this
is someone who reviled slavery, thought
it was abhorrent, knew that it would
have to be corrected in the future. He
didn't just list women. He also listed
lads from 12 to 21.
He specifically went out of his way to
uh describe people who have no skin in
the game, not a farthing. Means they're
not earners. They would not be paying
into the system. They would not be
contributors. They should not be allowed
to vote self-gain from the contributors.
This wasn't an accident. It was very
very
proactive, concerted, specific, and
reiterated to the point of redundancy.
All of these points, all of these myths
have been addressed ad nauseam as to
remove all doubt.
I highly recommend that you go and check
out the links, read more supportive
documents, read them for yourself.
And then I want you to juxtapose that to
the arguments, including the people
you've seen in these clips, that are
being made out there, and ask yourself,
my gosh, if they went out of their way
this this number of times, like I said,
to the point of redundancy, how could
someone be misinterpreting this
and then playing a game of telephone
with students?
The answer is they're not
misinterpreting it.
It's not a mistake.
They're deliberately lying about it.
This is not a gray issue.
This is black and white. Founding
fathers of this country were Christians.
They believed that this country could
only be a constitutional representative
republic and would only be adequate for
a free but moral and Christian people,
and that said government should
represent only those who could create,
sustain, fight for a country of meaning.
The founding fathers, of course, we all
know they were very flawed men,
just like any other men or women
throughout history,
they were flawed men who knew that they
needed God.
And that's precisely why they built the
representative republic that they did.
Check the references. I hope this helps.
Go tell your teacher that they suck.
>> [music]
>> I'm a strange animal.
That's what I know.
>> [music]
>> I'm a strange animal. [music]
I got to follow.
I'm a
spirited child.
>> [music]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.