Tucker Carlson Exposes FBI Collusion with Twitter to Censor Hunter Biden Story Before 2020 Election
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Media Finally Admits Hunter Biden Laptop Is Real After Dismissing It as Russian Disinformation
8:48
New York Times Confirms Hunter Biden Laptop Authenticity After Media and Big Tech Blocked the Story
4:28
Charlie Kirk Debates Student on Election Integrity, CIA Interference, and Hunter Biden Laptop Censorship
8:02
Tucker Carlson Exposes FBI Collusion with Twitter to Censor Hunter Biden Story Before 2020 Election
Tucker Carlson examines the Twitter Files revelations showing how the FBI worked secretly with social media companies to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. The documents reveal weekly meetings between FBI officials and Twitter executives, with government agencies flagging content for censorship through organizations like CISA. Carlson argues this represents an illegal violation of the First Amendment and campaign finance laws, describing it as government censorship on behalf of political candidates rather than the free and fair elections Americans expect.
Tucker Carlson opens by addressing the previously undisclosed documents on Twitter's service that were released, noting that while people already knew social media companies censor conservatives, the real revelation was far more serious. The documents showed that Big Tech worked aggressively and in secret with government agencies to subvert election outcomes while the rest of the country assumed they were participating in free and fair elections.
According to Carlson, the FBI was committing censorship on behalf of one candidate while hurting another. He describes this as hard to imagine a more brazen attack on democracy, emphasizing that this is not how the system is supposed to work and is in fact illegal. Twitter violated the First Amendment and established campaign finance law by never declaring their contributions to the Biden campaign, which Carlson states is a crime.
Thanks to reporting by Matt Taibbi, the public now knows how this happened. Carlson emphasizes this is not a conspiracy theory but an established fact. However, in the days since Taibbi's reporting, mainstream media outlets have either dismissed the story as entirely normal or attacked Taibbi personally for daring to write it.
Media Dismisses Bombshell Revelations
Carlson plays clips showing how various media figures responded to the Twitter Files. One commentator called the whole thing "ridiculous" and "not true." Another claimed it was "basically meaningless what happened and turned out to be a good thing." Others accused Elon Musk of being fixated on a "two-year-old story" and revealed "profound ignorance of the First Amendment."
One particularly notable clip featured a commentator explaining that the Twitter Files were helpful because they showed "how content moderation works" and "how when a group of people with differing political ideas and ideologies and views gets together in the spirit of making a platform safe and healthy."
Carlson expresses disbelief at these responses, noting Al Sharpton teaming up with a former George W. Bush aide to tell viewers that censorship is good. He takes issue with media figures calling censorship "content moderation" and describing the hiding of facts that voters need to cast informed votes in presidential elections as "safe and healthy."
FBI's Weekly Meetings with Tech Companies
Miranda Devine of the New York Post reported that the FBI met weekly with Twitter executives before the 2020 election. The FBI warned about hack and leak operations by state actors that would involve Hunter Biden and would likely come out in October. This information came from sworn depositions from Twitter's former chief censor.
The same pattern occurred with Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg confirmed in an interview that the FBI came to Facebook team members and said they should be on high alert, claiming there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election and warning that there was about to be some kind of dump similar to that, telling them to be vigilant. As a direct result of these meetings, Facebook also censored the Hunter Biden stories.
Carlson calls this a "stop the press" story, arguing that the FBI is the largest and most powerful domestic law enforcement agency in the world and cannot become a secret police force. If it does, he argues, it's no better than Russia under Putin and represents an authoritarian state by definition when the largest domestic law enforcement agency starts playing in domestic politics.
Yoel Roth and the Censorship Regime
The Twitter executive overseeing much of this censorship was Yoel Roth. Carlson notes that Roth had no technical expertise of any kind and didn't know about hacking, foreign affairs, or Russia. He received a PhD focusing on Grindr from the University of Pennsylvania, with the app appearing 300 times in his research.
Carlson questions how this qualified Roth for a position where he was in charge of what Americans were allowed to say and think. The one qualification Roth clearly had, according to Carlson, is that he does not believe in free speech, which he made clear in an interview where he discussed how misgendering is prohibited on Twitter and represents a "life-threatening" situation.
Carlson points out the irony that Roth himself once attacked trans people on Twitter, writing: "It wouldn't be a trip to New York without one big scary tranny." This is the kind of tweet that would get others reported to the FBI under Roth's own standards.
CISA: The Federal Government's Censorship Arm
Carlson reveals that Yoel Roth was rewarded for effectively allowing Joe Biden to get elected president by censoring criticism of his business deals with China. Roth was given an advisory role on CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Administration, which Carlson describes as the censorship arm of the federal government.
He questions how this organization can exist when the First Amendment specifically prohibits government censorship, asking why there is no court case on this and why people are standing by and putting up with it.
New documents reveal how aggressive CISA's censorship practices are. They operate a hotline that allows the government to pressure Big Tech companies to censor political opposition. One example shows a CISA official writing: "I wanted to flag two tweets about possible misinformation about the election."
Carlson explains that misinformation is a new word in common conversation, though it's been around in the intelligence world for a long time. The key aspect of misinformation is that it can be true - it doesn't have to be untrue to be censored.
State Officials Weaponizing Federal Censorship
One of the flagged tweets claimed the 2020 gubernatorial race in North Carolina was rigged, with late-arriving ballots being ignored and awarded to Democrats. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the tweet, it represents someone's opinion - the kind seen all the time on Twitter in what was supposed to be a free country.
What happened next shocked Carlson. Within minutes of CISA flagging the tweets, they sent the report to several DHS accounts and then to Twitter. The tweets were censored. A random person with a small Twitter following had their views shut down because federal agencies with armed agents didn't like their views on a state election.
Kentucky's Secretary of State did this all the time, as did Colorado's. Colorado reported several political parody accounts to DHS, which then alerted Twitter, and all were pulled off the platform. They were clearly labeled as parodies and were in fact jokes, but Twitter took the DHS complaints seriously and censored the accounts anyway.
Katie Hobbs and Arizona Election Censorship
At the beginning of the 2021 election cycle, staffers for Arizona's Secretary of State and gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs directed censorship efforts. Hobbs' office wrote to the Center for Internet Security: "I'm flagging this account for your review." CISA was later CC'd on the email.
The tweets were described as an attempt to undermine confidence in election institutions in Arizona. Carlson asks if people are not allowed to have concerns about confidence in elections, particularly in a state where the biggest county took more than a week to count ballots and where printers didn't work on election day despite working before.
The message from Hobbs' office ended with "Thank you for your consideration in reviewing this matter for action." Twitter then responded "We'll escalate" and censored the accounts.
This Is Illegal, Not Just Offensive
Carlson emphasizes repeatedly that this isn't just offensive - it's illegal. This is a crime, and a very serious one. He describes it as a crime against democracy, not like trespassing in the Capitol or looking at Nancy Pelosi's desk, but actual interference in the outcome of elections. It's beyond belief, yet it's also much more common than anyone thought.
Elon Musk suggested over the weekend that Twitter interfered abroad too, noting he was seeing a lot of recent tweets about the Brazil election. Musk said it's possible Twitter gave preference to left-wing candidates. Carlson points out the irony of people lecturing Americans about democracy while potentially interfering in foreign elections in Brazil, Hungary, El Salvador, and other countries whose leaders they don't like - not because these regimes pose a threat to the United States, but simply because they don't like them.
What is being learned about state interference in democratic elections around the world has long been suspected and is now being confirmed through these document releases.
Video Transcript
? >> Tucker: GOOD EVENING AND
WELCOME TO TUCKER CARLSON
TONIGHT.
THE MAIN THING WE LEARNED ON
FRIDAY NIGHT WITH THE PREVIOUSLY
UNDISCLOSED DOCUMENTS ON TWIT
SERVICE CONNECTED NOT THAT
SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES CENSOR
CONSERVATIVES, WE KNEW THAT BUT
NO ONE WAS SURPRISED TO CONFIRM
OR DENY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
WE LEARNED ON FRIDAY BIG TECH
WORKS AGGRESSIVELY AND IN SECRET
WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO
SUBVERT THE OUTCOME WITH THE
REST OF US ASSUMING FREE AND
FAIR ELECTIONS.
THE FBI COMMITTING CENSORSHIP ON
BEHALF OF ONE CANDIDATE AND
HURTING THE OTHER.
HARD TO IMAGINE A MORE BRAZEN
ATTACK ON THE DEMOCRACY THAN
THIS.
THIS IS NOT HOW THE SYSTEM IS
SUPPOSED TO WORK AND IT IS IN
FACT ILLEGAL.
TWITTER VIOLATED THE FIRST
AMENDMENT AND A ESTABLISHED
CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW AND NEVER
DECLARED THEM TO THE BIDEN
CAMPAIGN.
THAT’S A CRIME.
THANKS TO THE REPORTING OF MATT
TIABBI, WE KNOW THIS HATCHED.
IT’S NOT A -- HAPPENED.
IT’S NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY,
IT’S A FACT.
IN THE DAYS SINCE TAIBBI’S JAW
DROPPING SCOOPS, NONE OF THEM
FOLLOWED UP ON THE STORY AND
DISMISSED THEM AS ENTIRELY
NORMAL.
OF COURSE THE FBI WAS WORKING
SECRETLY WITH TWITTER AND THE
BIDEN CAMPAIGN TO CONTROL YOUR
BRAIN BY LIMITING YOUR ACCESS TO
FACTITIAL INFORMATION.
THAT’S HOW ELECTIONS WORK.
OR THEY’RE ATTACKING MATT
FIBROMYALGIA PERSONALLY FOR
FIBROMYALGIA PERSONALLY FOR
DARING TO WRITE THE STORY.
AS OF TONIGHT YOU’LL BE HAPPY TO
KNOW SAM BANKMAN-FRIED IS IN THE
BAHAMAS STILL NOT INDICTED AND
THE GUY UNCOVERING ILLEGAL
CENSORSHIP DURING A PRESIDENTIAL
CAMPAIGN.
HARD TO BELIEVE THEY’RE SAYING
THAT, OH, BUT THEY ARE.
HERE’S A SELECTION.
>> ELON MUSK RE-TWEETED THE
"TWITTER FILES" A COLLECTION OF
DOCUMENTS THAT DETAIL HOW THE
SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM SUPPOSEDLY
BURIED A STORY ABOUT A UKRAINIAN
ENERGY COMPANY PAYING MONEY TO
THE PRESIDENT’S SON, HUNTER
BIDEN.
FIRST OF ALL, I JUST HAVE TO SAY
THAT THIS WHOLE THING IS JUST
RIDICULOUS AND IT’S NOT TRUE.
>> IT WAS AMAZING TO ME THAT ALL
OF THESE SORT OF FOX NEWS OR
WHOEVER ELSE JUMPED ON THIS
WITHOUT EVER FULLY UNDERSTANDING
THAT IT WAS BASICALLY
MEANINGLESS WHAT HAPPENED AND
TURNED OUT TO BE A GOOD THING.
>> MUSK SEEMS FIXATED ON A
TWO-YEAR-OLD STORY ABOUT HUNTER
BIDEN’S LAPTOP.
>> THAT’S WHAT WE IN THE CABLE
BUSINESS CALL A HOT TAKE AND
REVEAL’S ELON MUSK AS PRO FOUND
IGNORANCE OF THE FIRST
AMENDMENT.
>> IT WAS A HELPFUL THING OF THE
TWITTER FILES BECAUSE WE GOT TO
SEE HOW CONTENT MODERATION WORKS
AND HOW WHEN A GROUP OF PEOPLE
WITH DIFFERING POLITICAL IDEAS
AND IDEOLOGIES AND VIEWS GETS
TOGETHER IN THE SPIRIT OF MAKING
A PLATFORM SAFE AND HEALTHY.
>> Tucker: THERE’S SO MUCH
THERE.
AL SHARPTON TEAMING UP WITH THE
FORMER GEORGE W. BUSH AID
TELLING YOU CENSORSHIP IS GOOD
AND FIRST LADY SAYING THIS
UKRAINIAN COMPANY ALLEGEDLY PAID
HUNTER BIDEN WHEN THERE’S NO
ALLEGEDLY ABOUT IT BECAUSE
EVERYONE INVOLVED ADMIT IT HAD
AND ALLIE SAYING WE IN THE CABLE
BUSINESS BUT HAS NEVER BEEN IN
THE NEWS BUSINESS AND PEOPLE IN
THE NEWS BUSINESS COVER THE NEWS
THE NEWS BUSINESS COVER THE NEWS
AND PROP PROPAGANDA PEOPLE CENSO
DISTORT THE NEWS.
IT’S CRUDE AND UNEFFECTIVE AND
SO UNBELIEVABLY NOT BELIEVABLE.
CENSORSHIP EXPLAINS BRANDY LIKE
KINDERGARTEN TEACHER AND CALLED
CONTENT MODERATION.
WHEN WE HIDE FACTS THAT YOU NEED
IN ORDER TO CAST AN INFORMED
VOTE IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,
THAT’S "SAFE AND HEALTHY".
HIDING FACTS FROM YOU IS SAFE
HIDING FACTS FROM YOU IS SAFE
AND HEALTHY.
NOT MANY BELIEVE THAT BUT
THEY’RE SAYING IT ANYWAY.
THE FORMER RNC CHAIRMAN BY THE
WAY LETTING YOU KNOW THAT
ACTUALLY REVEALING THE MECHANICS
OF CENSORSHIP IS ITSELF AN
ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH.
>> PUTTING THOSE BACK ON THE
PLATFORM JUST WITH THE POSITION
OF THE ARGUMENT THAT HE’S ALL
ABOUT FREE SPEECH, REALLY
UNDERMINES SOME OF THE CENTRAL
TENANTS OF FREE SPEECH IS THAT
TENANTS OF FREE SPEECH IS THAT
IT IS ABOUT THE FREEDOM OF YOU.
YOU REALLY CLAIM THE PLATFORM IS
SUPPOSED TO B. >> Tucker: ANY
SUPPOSED TO B. >> Tucker: ANY
DAY YOU GET TO SEE MICHAEL
STEELE MISUSE THE WORDS
JUSTIFICATION AND IT WAS THE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
THE ESSENTIAL TENANT OF FREE
SPEECH AND THE ESSENTIAL TENANT
AND THEY’RE NEVER GOING TO SAY
THINGS THEY OBJECT IT.
OKAY, MICHAEL STEELE.
IF YOU GET A CHANCE, LET US KNOW
WHAT CONSTITUTION YOU’VE BEEN
READING AND THE ONE WE HAVE HERE
IN THE U.S., IN THE UNITED
STATES, YOU GET TO SAY AS AN
AMERICAN CITIZEN WHAT YOU
BELIEVE, PERIOD.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THE
GOVERNMENT INFRINGE ON THAT
RIGHT, PERIOD.
THAT’S THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
THANKS TO TWITTER FILES WE KNOW
THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS VIOLATED
MORE PROFOUNDLY THAN ANY TIME IN
OUR LINES.
MIRANDA DEVINE OF THE NEW YORK
POST REPORTED THAT THE FBI MET
"WEEKLY" WITH TWITTER EXECUTIVES
BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION AND THE
FBI WARNED ABOUT HACK AND LEAK
OPERATIONS BY STATE ACTORS THAT
WOULD INVOLVE HUNTER BIDEN AND
"LIKELY COME OUT IN OCTOBER".
WE KNOW THAT BECAUSE IT APPEARED
IN THE SWORN DEPOSITION FROM
QUITTER’S FORMER CHIEF --
TWITTER’S FORMER CHIEF CENSORRER
AND IT WAS ALSO FACEBOOK.
THE FBI WAS HOLDING MEETINGS
WITH FACEBOOK WHICH ALSO NOT
SURPRISINGLY AND AS A DIRECT
RESULT OF THESE MEETINGS
CENSORED THE HUNTER BIDEN
STORIES.
WATCH.
>> THERE WAS A LOT OF ATTENTION
ON TWITTER DURING THE ELECTION
BECAUSE OF THE HUNTER BIDEN
LAPTOP STORY.
>> WE GOAT THAT TOO.
>> YOU GUYS CENSORED THAT AS
WELL?
>> WE TOOK A DIFFERENT PATH THAN
TWITTER.
BASICALLY THE BACKGROUND IS THE
FBI BASICALLY CAME TO US, SOME
FOLKS ON OUR TEAM AND WAS LIKE,
HEY, JUST SO YOU KNOW, YOU
SHOULD BE ON HIGH ALERT WE
THOUGHT THERE WAS A LOT OF
RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA IN THE 2016
ELECTION, WE HAVE IT ON NOTICE
THAT BASICALLY THERE’S ABOUT TO
BE SOME KIND OF DUMP OF --
THAT’S SIMILAR TO THAT SO BE
VIGILANT.
>> Tucker: SO THIS IS A STOP
THE PRESS’ STORY.
THE FBI IS THE LARGEST AND MOST
POWERFUL DOMESTIC LAW
POWERFUL DOMESTIC LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE WORLD.
IT CAN’T BECOME A SECRET POLICE
FORCE AND IF IT DOES, IT’S NO
BETTER THAN SAY RUSSIA UNDER
PUTIN AND IT IS A AUTHORITARIAN
STATE BY DEFINITION IF THE
LARGEST DOMESTIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY STARTS TO PLAY IN
DOMESTIC POLITICS.
BUT THEY ARE AND WE KNOW THAT
AND NO ONE IS SAYING ANYTHING
ABOUT IT AND THAT’S VERY
STRANGE.
THE TWITTER EXECUTIVE WAS ROTH.
YOLE ROTH HAD NO TECHNICAL
EXPERTISE OF ANY KIND KIND AND
DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT HACKING AND
FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND RUSSIA AND
RECEIVED A PHD IN THE BACKGROUND
OF GRINDER AND GOT A APP FROM
THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA,
REPORTEDLY AN IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL
YOU SHOULD BE IMPRESSED BY AND
GRINDER APPEARS 300 TIMES IN HIS
RESEARCH AND UPENN GAVE ME A PHD
FOR THAT.
WHATEVER YOU THINK, HOW DID THAT
GET YOLE ROTH INTO THE POSITION
THAT HE OCCUPIED AT TWITTER
WHERE HE WAS IN CHARGE OF WHAT
YOU WERE ALLOWED TO SAY AND
THINK?
WELL, THE ONE QUALIFICATION WE
KNOW YOEL ROTH DID HAVE IS HE
DOES NOT BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH,
PERIOD.
HE MADE THAT VERY CLEAR IN AN
INTERVIEW LAST WEEK.
>> BABALON IS THE ONE THAT GOT
HIM TO BUY THE THING, WHICH WAS
NOT PARTICULARLY FUNNY.
NOT PARTICULARLY FUNNY.
THE BABALONB MAN OF THE YEAR IS
RACHEL.
>> THE TARGETTIZATION OF
ASSISTANCE GENDER ON TWITTER IS
REAL AND THIEF -- TRANSGENDER ON
TWITTER IS VERY REAL AND LIFE
THREATENING AND EXTRAORDINARY.
WE’VE SEEN FROM TIKTOKS THAT
THERE’S ORCHESTRATED CAMPAIGNS
THAT PARTICULARLY ARE SINGLING
OUT A GROUP THAT IS ALREADY
PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE WITHIN
SOCIETY.
TWITTER’S WRITTEN POLICIES
PROHIBIT MISS GENDERING, FULL
STOP.
>> Tucker: IT’S SO GREAT.
IT’S LIFE THREATENING TO TELL
JOKES.
THE LIFE COACHES THAT JOEL ROTH
UPHELD HIS LIFE TO PROTECTING
AND NEVER KNOW WHEN THEY CHANGE
OR WHAT GROUNDS AND THEY CHANGE
AND USUALLY CAUGHT IN THE CROSS
FIRE AND YOU’RE BUSTED FOR
SAYING SOMETHING YOU DIDN’T KNOW
YOU WEREN’T ALLOWED TO SAY.
PROBABLY THE GREATEST EXAMPLE IS
THAT YOEL ROTH HIMSELF ONCE
ATTACKED TRANS PEOPLE ON TWITTER
AND CALLED THEM TRANNIES.
WHOA.
THEREBY THREATENING THEIR LIVES.
"IT WOULDN’T BE A TRIP TO NEW
YORK WITHOUT ONE BIG SCARY
TRANNY".
THAT’S AN ACTUAL TWEET FROM YOEL
ROTH AND THE KIND OF TWEET THAT
IF YOU WROTE IT HE’D CALL THE
FBI AND NOW HAS TO PRETEND TO BE
OFFENDED BY ALL THIS BECAUSE HIS
PROPORTED OFFENSE, THE TERROR HE
FEELS GIVES HIM A PRETEXT TO
CENSOR YOU ON BEHALF OF THE MOST
POWERFUL PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.
>> Tucker: THE BIDEN
>> Tucker: THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION APPOINTED THE
PERSON WHO EFFECTIVELY ALLOWED
JOE BIDEN TO GET ELECTED
PRESIDENT BY CENSORING CHRIS
SCHISM OF HIS BUSINESS DEAL --
CRITICISM OF HIS BUSINESS DEALS
IN WHICH HE TOOK MONEY FROM
CHINA AND REWARDED BY GETTING AN
ADVISORY ROLE ON CISA,
CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE
ADMINISTRATION.
IT’S THE CENSORSHIP ARM OF THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
HOW CAN THIS EXIST?
OUR FIRST AMENDMENT SPECIFICALLY
PROHIBITS THAT AND WHY IS THERE
NO COURT CASE ON THIS?
WHY ARE PEOPLE STANDING BY AND
PUTTING UP WITH IT?
ITS REACH IS EXTENSE AND I HAVE
THE NEW DOCUMENT IN THE ON GOING
DOCUMENT AND BIG TECH REVEALS
HOW AGGRESSIVE THE CENSORSHIP
CIFA PRACTICE IS.
THEY’RE A HOT LINE THAT ALLOWS
THE GOVERNMENT TO PRESSURE THE
BIG TECH COMPANIES TO CENSOR
BIG TECH COMPANIES TO CENSOR
POLITICAL OPPOSITION.
I WANTED TO FLAG TWO TWEETS
ABOUT POSSIBLE MISINFORMATION
ABOUT THE ELECTION.
IT’S A NEW WORD BEEN AROUND IN
THE INTEL WORLD FOR A LONG TIME
AND NEVER BEEN USED IN COMMON
CONVERSATION TILL RECENTLY AND
THE MISINFORMATION AND LYING IS
THAT MISINFORMATION CAN BE TRUE.
THAT MISINFORMATION CAN BE TRUE.
IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE UNTRUE TO
SAY IT.
NOT ANYMORE.
WITH MIS-AND DISINFORMATION IF I
DON’T LIKE IT, IF I’M IN POWER,
I CAN CENSOR YOU.
I CAN CENSOR YOU.
ONE OF THE OFFENDING TWEETS THAT
ONE OF THE OFFENDING TWEETS THAT
THE 2020 GUBERNATORIAL AND READW
IGNORED AND AWARDED THE
DEMOCRATS.
BALLOTS CAN APPEAR WHENEVER FROM
WHOMEVER.
NOW YOU CAN AGREE OR DISAGREE
WITH THE TWEETS, IT’S TRUE.
BUT IT’S THEIR OPINIONS.
AND YOU SEE TWEETS LIKE THAT ALL
THE TIME ON TWITTER AND THIS IS
A FREE COUNTRY OR WAS.
BUT WHAT HAPPENED NEXT IS
SHOCKING.
IT’S AMAZING THAT ANYONE WOULD
DEFEND IT.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN
THOSE OPINIONS WITHIN MINUTES
CISA FLAGGED THE TWEETS TO
SEVERAL DHS ACCOUNTS.
PEOPLE WITH GUNS AND CISA SENT
THE REPORT TO TWITTER.
PLEASE SEE THE REPORT BELOW FROM
WASHINGTON AND THE TWEETS WERE
CENSORED AND THEY GOT A RANDOM
PERSON WITH A SMALL TWITTER
FOLLOWING SHUT DOWN BECAUSE THEY
DIDN’T LIKE HIS OR HER VIEWS ON