Zach Costello Reports Andrew Kolvet Confirmed Authenticity of Charlie Kirk's Leaked Group Text Messages
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Charlie Kirk's Final Text Messages Revealed: 'Leaving Me No Choice But to Leave the Pro-Israel Cause'
24:50
Dave Smith and Nick Fuentes Reveal the Truth About Charlie Kirk's Final Stance on Israel
30:01
Candace Owens Raises Questions About Possible Foreknowledge of Charlie Kirk's Assassination by His Inner Circle
26:21
Zach Costello Reports Andrew Kolvet Confirmed Authenticity of Charlie Kirk's Leaked Group Text Messages
Host Zach Costello reports that Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, has publicly confirmed the authenticity of a group text exchange that Candace Owens released, in which Charlie Kirk reportedly told Turning Point USA advisers he was tired of being pressured by Jewish donors over his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson and said he felt he had no choice but to step back from the pro-Israel cause. The messages, sent roughly 48 hours before Kirk's assassination, had drawn heavy criticism online after Owens published them, with critics calling them fabricated. Kolvet explained on his show that he personally shared the screenshot with government officials in the immediate aftermath of the shooting to ensure it was considered as potential evidence, but had not intended for it to become public, and said he regretted that it leaked. Costello argues the messages establish a possible motive worth investigating given reported scrutiny of foreign involvement in the case.
Costello opens by reviewing a clip from Candace Owens' show in which she read aloud a group text exchange she said involved Charlie Kirk and members of his Turning Point USA inner circle. In the exchange, Kirk reportedly wrote that he had just lost a major Jewish donor worth $2 million a year over his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson, said Jewish donors were 'playing into stereotypes,' and stated he could not and would not be bullied, leaving him, in his words, no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause. A participant identified as Sedona responded urging him not to invite Candace Owens into the conversation, arguing it might feel good short-term but would not be good long-term. Costello notes the messages are dated roughly 48 hours before Charlie Kirk's assassination.
Backlash to the Release
Costello recounts that Owens faced significant online criticism after publishing the messages, with critics calling them fabricated and accusing her of exploiting Charlie Kirk's death. He says this criticism followed a broader pattern in which Owens was accused of lacking evidence for her claims about pressure campaigns against Kirk from pro-Israel figures.
Andrew Kolvet's On-Air Confirmation
Costello plays a clip of Andrew Kolvet, identified as executive producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, addressing the leaked messages directly on his program. Kolvet confirms the screenshot is authentic and says he personally shared it, though only privately with select government officials, in the chaotic hours following the shooting, in order to ensure investigators considered every possible lead. Kolvet says he did not intend for the screenshot to become public and felt it was not his to share, but expresses relief that the underlying truth is now out, given criticism that Kirk's team had not pursued every lead in the investigation.
Costello's Interpretation
Costello argues that, because the messages are dated just before Kirk's assassination, they establish a possible motive relevant to reported scrutiny of foreign involvement in the case. He references claims that Israel has used paid social media influencers as part of broader public messaging efforts, citing a statement attributed to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu describing social media as a weapon of modern warfare, and argues this context is relevant to evaluating criticism leveled at Owens, Kirk, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly.
The Caveat on Israeli Involvement
Costello notes, echoing language used by Kolvet, that the authenticated messages do not themselves prove Israel was involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination, but argues it is similarly inappropriate to rule out the possibility entirely, framing his position as advocating openness to further investigation rather than asserting a settled conclusion.
