Camron Vance Investigates New Video Evidence in Charlie Kirk Assassination Attempt Case

[00:00] Lost subscribers have been sending me

[00:01] this video. It has 5 million views. New

[00:04] video evidence for the Kirk

[00:05] assassination changes everything. Was he

[00:07] shot from the side? I'm going to quickly

[00:09] show you some never-before-seen footage

[00:11] that I took the day I was there that

[00:13] shows how he was exposed from the right

[00:16] side. So, I went up through the Hall of

[00:18] Flags to another entry point. There's a

[00:20] lot of speculation online that this was

[00:23] the actual location from where Charlie

[00:25] was shot is right side.

[00:29] Now, you'll notice as I go through the

[00:30] doors here, check out the tent. Even

[00:32] from this first level, because there is

[00:34] another level above me, Charlie's right

[00:36] side is easily exposed from this vantage

[00:38] point. You'll also notice that this

[00:40] stairwell is packed with people, even

[00:43] though the event hasn't officially

[00:45] started yet. Now, this is 12:21, about 2

[00:48] minutes before Charlie was shot.

[00:54] Now, the theory that the shooter was up

[00:55] in this crowd of people, I think there

[00:57] would have been instant repercussions,

[00:59] right? The Tim Walls lookalike guy that

[01:01] said, "I'm the shooter. I'm the

[01:02] shooter." He got tackled almost

[01:04] immediately by like eight or nine

[01:06] right-winger guys. Now, there's also a

[01:08] theory that a shooter was standing on

[01:10] this balcony over here. All right, this

[01:12] is 12:17

[01:15] about 5 6 minutes before Charlie was

[01:18] shot. You can see this balcony is empty

[01:21] except for a single solitary chair and a

[01:24] plant. Now this is 12:21 about 2 minutes

[01:27] before Charlie was shot.

[01:32] Still not seeing anyone up there.

[01:33] Doesn't mean there wasn't someone up

[01:35] there. But right here is about a minute

[01:37] and a half before he was shot. No one

[01:40] that I can see from my vantage point on

[01:42] the ground.

[01:49] Now, I did turn away

[01:52] and walked back to the other side, the

[01:54] north side of the courtyard.

[01:56] >> Ultimately, this is where I stopped

[01:58] recording a few seconds before the shot

[02:01] rang out. I'm talking a couple of

[02:03] seconds.

[02:05] >> Where you at?

[02:12] 1223 directly after the shot.

[02:18] Holy [ __ ]

[02:33] Now, we can kind of see the balcony

[02:34] behind here.

[02:37] Of course, if there was a shooter there,

[02:39] they've definitely fled by this point.

[02:42] But I am going to test the theory that

[02:45] there was someone closer with a handgun

[02:47] versus with a rifle over 100 yards away.

[02:50] To test this theory, I brought out a

[02:52] decibel meter to measure the audio level

[02:54] of a 9 mm at about 20 yards versus a 30

[02:58] 6 at 160 y. We'll see if the sound

[03:01] signatures match up with the shot that

[03:03] was recorded on video. There's a lot of

[03:05] theories that it was actually a handgun

[03:07] from closer to Charlie, maybe from the

[03:09] side in the audience. So, we're going to

[03:11] do an audio test next. I'm gonna place a

[03:14] decibel meter and a microphone near the

[03:16] table the same distance away that this

[03:18] gunshot was recorded in this video

[03:20] >> over the last 10 years counting or not

[03:23] counting gang violence. Great.

[03:25] >> And then we're going to look and see if

[03:26] the audio waves match up and if the

[03:28] loudness is equal from a 9 mm closer up

[03:32] versus a 30 6 over 100 yards away. This

[03:36] camera is going to do two things. It's

[03:38] going to pick up the shot with a

[03:39] microphone and it's going to record our

[03:41] decibel meter.

[03:53] Now I got to sprint back

[03:55] to my rifle position

[03:58] while everything's still recording.

[04:01] Okay.

[04:04] All right.

[04:19] Hope I got it.

[04:21] [Applause]

[04:28] [Applause]

[04:45] So, now that I'm in front of a computer

[04:47] looking at these audio files, there's

[04:49] something really interesting here. Look

[04:51] at this orange box here that has the

[04:52] waveform for the 9 mm. It's a sharp

[04:55] crack and then the audio falls off.

[04:58] That's because it doesn't have the same

[04:59] kind of sonic boom that a larger round

[05:01] would have like the 300 6. So, let's

[05:04] listen to my pistol shot and compare it

[05:06] to the actual shot recorded that day.

[05:12] All right. Now, let's listen to the 300

[05:14] 6 compared to the actual shot.

[05:20] If you look at the waveform from the 300

[05:22] 6, there's an initial crack followed by

[05:24] the sonic boom scoops to smaller boom.

[05:28] We can see that mountain drop off

[05:31] secondary.

[05:33] And we can see that with the actual shot

[05:34] as well. Now, of course, the boom and

[05:36] echo from UVU is going to be a lot

[05:38] sharper and more pronounced because this

[05:41] courtyard is surrounded by concretefaced

[05:44] buildings. A bullet that came down from

[05:46] the Losi center would likely have a

[05:48] sharp report as a sonic boom. Where I

[05:50] was shooting in Skull Valley, Utah,

[05:52] there was a lot more room, a lot more

[05:54] space for that sound to disperse. Second

[05:57] thing a shot and boom being closer

[05:59] together could mean is that the shot

[06:01] came from closer than the FBI reported

[06:05] and was initially believed. Whether the

[06:07] boom sounded closer because it

[06:09] reverberated around the concrete or the

[06:11] gunman was actually closer to Charlie, I

[06:14] am still convinced that it was a rifle

[06:17] and not a pistol. Now, my next video,

[06:19] which is already up on the channel, I am

[06:21] going to recreate the shot. I'm also

[06:23] going to talk about the rifle itself.

[06:25] Could it have been broken down? Could it

[06:27] have been concealed? Don't forget to

[06:29] like and share this video so it does not

[06:31] get suppressed by YouTube, by the

[06:33] algorithm. If you like this type of gun

[06:35] content, talking about the more serious

[06:37] side of news, don't forget to like and

[06:39] subscribe. I'm Cameron Vance and I'll

[06:41] catch you next time.

[06:50] [Music]