2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Defends Trump on January 6th and Confronts Student on Constitutional Values and Government Responsibility
Charlie Kirk faces off with a skeptical student who challenges Trump's commitment to the Constitution, citing January 6th and press restrictions. Kirk responds by defending Trump's media accessibility, arguing the American people rejected the January 6th narrative in the election, and pointing to Democrats' attempts to remove Trump from state ballots as the real constitutional threat. The exchange escalates into a broader debate about government responsibility, federal funding, and whether parents or the state should feed children, with Kirk arguing against free school lunches and emphasizing America's child obesity crisis over starvation concerns.
A student at a Turning Point USA event challenged Charlie Kirk on what he perceived as Donald Trump's threats to the Constitution, specifically referencing January 6th. The student acknowledged the founding fathers had good ideas despite their flaws and praised Kirk's emphasis on upholding the Constitution, but expressed concern about what he saw as inconsistency when it came to Trump's actions.
Kirk immediately pushed back, characterizing the question as outdated and pointing to the election results as the American people's verdict on the January 6th narrative. He argued that Trump did not try to overthrow the Constitution, and that the media's focus on this issue ultimately backfired.
Kirk then reframed the narrative, stating that 99% of people who entered the Capitol on January 6th did so peacefully to pray and visit what he called "the people's house." He claimed only 15 people committed violent actions against police officers. He pivoted to criticizing the Democratic Party for keeping the border open, sending money to Ukraine, creating hyperinflation, and lying about January 6th.
Who Really Threatens the Constitution?
Kirk turned the constitutional argument back on the student, arguing that it was actually the Democratic Party that posed a threat to the Constitution. He pointed to efforts by five Democratic states—including Maine, Colorado, and California—that attempted to remove Trump from the ballot, calling him an insurrectionist and a threat to democracy.
Kirk dismissed the need to relitigate the issue further, stating that Trump won the election and is now in power. The student attempted to clarify that he was not a Democrat and didn't agree with the Democratic Party, emphasizing his personal belief in upholding the Constitution.
Press Freedom and Media Access
The student then raised concerns about Trump suppressing the media, which Kirk strongly contested. He argued that it was actually Joe Biden who suppressed the media by rarely talking to them, while Trump does more media than any president in the last 50 years.
Kirk cited Trump's media accessibility, noting that he had done press conferences at 12 p.m., 2 p.m., and 6 p.m. that day alone, marking the third time that week he had done so. He emphasized that anyone could ask any question they wanted at these conferences.
The student countered by referencing the Associated Press and a recent announcement that the administration was eliminating the nonpartisan group that selects journalists for press conferences, arguing that Trump would now pick journalists himself, resulting in "bootlickers" rather than genuine press freedom.
Kirk responded by saying he didn't want to hear from journalists like Jim Acosta or Kaitlan Collins, suggesting the American people didn't either. The exchange revealed fundamental disagreements about what constitutes press freedom and media access.
Both Sides Are Corrupt?
The student attempted to position himself as standing above partisan politics, stating he believed both sides were morally bankrupt and supported by billionaires who should be removed from power. Kirk acknowledged this perspective but challenged the student's overall attitude.
Kirk argued that it's easy to go through life saying everything is terrible, but in reality, Americans now have "the best government that you've had in a hundred years." He acknowledged there would be disagreements and things people don't like, but characterized the overall direction as getting "99 out of 100 things right."
He specifically defended Elon Musk, calling him the world's wealthiest man who is "sacrificing himself to go solve government." Kirk criticized what he called the student's "morally sanctimonious" attitude of claiming to support the Constitution while opposing Trump, suggesting this stance was about appearing cool rather than being practical.
Federal Funding and Government Responsibility
The debate shifted to federal spending, with the student arguing that if the government wants to respect people and improve the country, it shouldn't cut federal funding. Kirk immediately disagreed, stating "of course we should" cut federal funding, adding that's what they were elected to do.
The student asked about the child tax credit, but Kirk clarified that's not federal funding but rather a tax issue. When asked about free school lunch for all children, Kirk firmly opposed it, arguing that parents should feed their kids, not the government.
Child Hunger vs. Child Obesity
When the student asked what should happen if parents can't afford to feed their children, Kirk suggested they should get a job. The student pushed back, suggesting some parents do have jobs but the minimum wage is too low to support their children.
Kirk dismissed this concern, making a strong case that America doesn't have a child starvation problem but rather a child obesity problem. He challenged the student to show him a single child in America going hungry, claiming it doesn't exist.
Kirk argued that churches, food shelters, and community organizations provide billions in assistance. He stated that 50% of American kids are obese or overweight, and that not a single child has died of starvation in the last 10 years. He called child hunger claims "propaganda from the Democrat Party."
He emphasized that the number one problem for kids is that they're not moving enough and eating too much, not starvation. Kirk concluded by advocating for a return to a time when parents, churches, and communities—rather than "big daddy government"—fed children and took responsibility for family welfare.
