Charlie Kirk on Trump's Indictment, America's Moral Decline, and the Battle for the Next Generation

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Warns Britain Has Become a Husk of Its Former Self in Fiery London Interview

Charlie Kirk Warns Britain Has Become a Husk of Its Former Self in Fiery London Interview

26:22

Charlie Kirk on Building a Voter Turnout Machine That Helped Reelect President Trump in 2024

Charlie Kirk on Building a Voter Turnout Machine That Helped Reelect President Trump in 2024

26:11

JD Vance Warns Gen Z About Becoming Paupers in Their Own Country at High Point University

JD Vance Warns Gen Z About Becoming Paupers in Their Own Country at High Point University

46:55

Charlie Kirk on Trump's Indictment, America's Moral Decline, and the Battle for the Next Generation

Charlie Kirk sits down for an extensive conversation about the state of America, covering everything from the manufactured prosecution of Donald Trump to the collapse of patriotism among younger generations. Kirk addresses why he remains loyal to Trump despite maintaining respect for DeSantis, explains how social media censorship nearly destroyed his platform, and reveals his strategy for winning back a generation that's only 15% proud to be American. The founder of Turning Point USA doesn't hold back on the Christian compromise problem, the restrict act's threat to free speech, and why he believes the indictment of Trump represents a legal Pearl Harbor that changes American politics forever.

Categories: Interviews
April 3, 2023

The Man Who Started a Movement at Eighteen

Patrick Bet-David introduces Charlie Kirk as a force to be reckoned with for decades to come, recounting witnessing Kirk raise over forty million dollars in ninety minutes at a fundraiser. Kirk, who founded Turning Point USA at eighteen years old without attending college, has built one of the largest organizations in the conservative movement. His mission centers on restoring the promise of the American founding and living in a free society, believing the Constitution is the greatest political document ever written and that America is the greatest nation ever to exist.

Kirk also hosts a national radio show and runs one of the top five conservative podcasts. When asked about his high school self, Kirk describes being very political, hyperactive, an Eagle Scout, football captain, and basketball captain. He jokes that he definitely would have been medicated for ADHD if he were in high school today, calling it both a blessing and a curse that he tries to channel for good.

The Collapse of American Values

The conversation shifts to alarming polling data on patriotism across generations. Baby Boomers and older show seventy-three percent pride in being American, Gen X fifty-six percent, Millennials thirty-six percent, and Gen Z a dismal fifteen percent. Kirk addresses how he plans to reach these younger demographics, explaining that he goes directly to college campuses where his events have become so successful they struggle to find rooms large enough to accommodate all the students who want to attend.

Kirk argues that the core message of why we love America shouldn't be political. He explains the American founding was an unbelievable unique moment in human history, reliant on classical observations of human nature that made claims against tyranny in the pursuit of liberty. The founders believed in the individual and the dignity of the individual, that the person is made in the image of the Divine, therefore having worth and dignity. This belief system built around the sovereignty of the individual has turned into the most amazing society ever to exist, and now we're deciding to end that.

Wall Street Journal data shows a collapse in American values, with patriotism, community involvement, having children, and going to church all descending in importance, while only money has increased in value. Kirk identifies this as hyper-individualism, clarifying that while he supports capitalism and believes markets work, they must exist in harmony with other duties that make money meaningful. Otherwise, it's nothing more than pleasure or things that will erode to dust.

The Christian Compromise and the Muslim Alternative

The discussion turns to Andrew Tate's conversion to Islam and his argument that Christianity has compromised its values while Islam remains uncompromising. Kirk acknowledges that many Christian denominations are becoming more like the world than following the word, but argues this is a bad reason to convert to Islam. He points out there are plenty of uncompromising Christian churches available.

Kirk explains we're living through what Nietzsche predicted in the 1860s through 1880s when he stated that God is dead. Nietzsche was not celebrating this but warning that if the West replaces God with consumerism, the Industrial Revolution, and hyper-individualism, we should be careful what takes its place. We're now living through a mixture of synthetic worldviews that emerge when Christianity or cogent Western morality deteriorates.

The conversation explores why Islam appears attractive to some, particularly black men, as a religion unapologetic in patriarchy. In a hyper-feminist world, this seems appealing. Kirk notes this isn't new, pointing to Malcolm X, Muhammad Ali, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. However, Kirk argues Islam goes too far in the order direction, creating theocratic fascist countries without freedom of speech, dialogue, private property rights, or entrepreneurship. The West is best because it balances order with spontaneity and unpredictability.

The Missing Christian Celebrities

When asked who the most famous non-pastor Christian is today getting others to convert, Kirk struggles to name someone comparable to Muslim celebrities converting others. He acknowledges figures like Justin Bieber say good things about Jesus but aren't theologically sound. Mark Wahlberg gets mentioned for his recent public embrace of Catholic faith and his move to Nevada, though he immediately caught heat for it.

Kirk notes this represents a massive shift from the 1950s and 1960s when major cultural figures like John Wayne, Joe DiMaggio, and Babe Ruth were outspoken Christians. Now the landscape is dominated by secularism or agnosticism, and any Christian celebrity who speaks out must preface it with social liberalism. Kirk points out Patrick Mahomes is an outspoken Christian who loves America, and Tom Brady is a pro-American conservative, though there's a difference between being something and actively promoting and driving it.

The conversation touches on how Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu documentaries consistently portray Christians negatively. Kirk challenges anyone to find a film in the last ten years that portrays someone who is Christian in a positive light. The archetype has become that if you see a Bible in a film, that person will almost certainly be a villain or hypocrite, rarely someone acting ethically or morally.

The Twitter Blacklist Revelation

Kirk reveals he was placed on Twitter's do not amplify list, learned through Elon Musk's Twitter Files reported by Bari Weiss. His account, which according to Axios was the fourth largest engaged Twitter account on the planet averaging one hundred thirty-five thousand retweets daily, dropped overnight to one thousand retweets per day. This shadow ban happened without his knowledge, and Jack Dorsey lied under oath to Congress about such practices.

Kirk emphasizes that without three critical developments, America would look even more like East Germany than it does now. First, Elon Musk buying Twitter. Second, Spotify not dropping Joe Rogan, though Kirk believes Rogan might not renew his Spotify contract and could be successful doing his own thing. Third, Rumble existing as competition to YouTube. Kirk discloses he's a shareholder in Rumble and believes what they're doing is magical in pushing back against YouTube's dominance.

The Restrict Act: Patriot Act 2.0

Kirk sounds the alarm on the Restrict Act, which he calls the Patriot Act on steroids for social media. While marketed as legislation to ban TikTok due to Chinese data harvesting, Kirk argues it would give the Secretary of Commerce unprecedented censorship authority. The bill has bipartisan support, which Kirk says is a red flag that lobbyists are pushing something bad for freedom.

The concern is that under the Restrict Act, the government could ban Telegram, Rumble, and Twitter based on foreign components. Telegram was founded by a Russian, Rumble in Canada, and Twitter has shareholders like the Saudis. Kirk hates TikTok and thinks it's digital fentanyl, but believes giving DC unprecedented censorship authority when the internet is becoming freer would be a massive mistake. He argues the tech companies Google and Facebook are pushing this legislation to eliminate competition.

Trump's Indictment: A Legal Pearl Harbor

Kirk calls Trump's indictment a legal Pearl Harbor, something that's never been done before that we'll never forget. He argues they're directly interfering with an election, and if they don't like Trump, they should beat him at the ballot box. Based on public reporting and grand jury leaks, Kirk believes this is a paperwork error that might be a misdemeanor being upgraded to a felony, while Alvin Bragg has downgraded fifty-two percent of previously classified felonies to misdemeanors.

Kirk introduces the concept of anarcho-tyranny from Sam Francis, where basic things needed to keep society safe like holding murderers accountable or prosecuting drug trafficking and arson are being loosened, while tyranny increases for politically favored crimes. The real crime Trump committed, according to Kirk, was winning the 2016 election. The left in New York and the elite were legitimately traumatized the night Hillary Clinton was supposed to break the glass ceiling, and they swore a blood oath seven years ago to get him.

Kirk points out this isn't the first attempt to take out Trump through non-democratic means. They tried with the FISA court warrant obtained illegally by James Comey and Peter Strzok to spy on his campaign, then the first impeachment over a phone call, then the second impeachment over January sixth. He believes there's great fear they won't be able to replicate what happened in 2020, whether you believe it was fraud or just unusual circumstances with mail-in ballots, private Zuckerberg money, drop boxes, and COVID confusion.

The Loyalty Question: Trump versus DeSantis

Kirk addresses his complicated position having endorsed Trump for 2024 while maintaining respect for DeSantis. He explains Turning Point USA as a 501c3 must stay out of politics by law, focusing on educational work on high school and college campuses. Personally, Kirk endorsed Trump and admits losing ten or twelve major donors over it, but explains his reasoning with loyalty at the center.

Kirk was twenty-four years old sitting in the Oval Office as a non-college graduate, getting invited on Air Force One. Trump was generous to Turning Point USA when Kirk was not nearly as successful or popular as today. Kirk says he would be the most ungrateful, short-sighted person to turn my back on the man who believed in me. Beyond loyalty, Kirk genuinely believes Trump was a fabulous president, noting his relentless work ethic, unmatched energy, love of country, amazing patriotism, and creativity.

On DeSantis, Kirk acknowledges it's true that DeSantis wouldn't have been the Republican nominee without Trump's endorsement when he was down thirty points to Adam Putnam. The Tampa Bay Times headline read fueled by Trump, Ron DeSantis easily beats Adam Putnam despite Putnam spending thirty-seven million dollars, more than twice what DeSantis spent. However, DeSantis became a great governor on his own merit with an unbelievably good record, especially during COVID.

When asked what he would do if he were DeSantis, Kirk says he'd probably still run, referencing Chris Christie as folklore in conservative world, the man who never ran in 2012 when he was the darling of the Republican Party. Kirk explains it's better to run and lose than to not run at all and be forgotten, citing Rahm Emanuel's advice to Obama in 2004 after his DNC speech. Kirk predicts Trump will win the nomination absent a black swan event, as the indictment validates every core argument Trump makes about the system being against him, helping him tremendously in the Republican primary.

The Path Forward for America

Kirk argues that in times of great crisis, people inherently point back to great tenets or truths. After 9/11, America unified because the great truth was nobody messes with the greatest country in the world. The word together kept coming up as people healed, mourned, and were angry together. However, in an age of moral relativism where everybody's truth is okay, there's no standard ruler for morals, patriotism, faith, or what's good for community.

The conversation traces the crack in America's heart back to 1968-69 when four things came together: the deaths of Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King, the Summer of Love, and what some believed was the senseless sending of young men to war if they didn't get into college. This created a loss of faith in elders and institutions. While the Summer of Love was well-intended with the idea that everybody's truth is okay, the unintended consequence was losing control when there's no single standard.

Kirk warns that if moral chaos continues, tyranny comes next. There's a totalitarian impulse running through the country called identity politics and political correctness. The answer won't be more freedom or liberty in the short term, but instruments of meaning and somebody to tell you what to do, which is one reason the COVID fascism was accepted by so many Americans for so long. Strong leaders emerge when the moral fiber of a country decays.

Kirk believes the American founding is the great rallying point, so beautiful, exceptional, and rare in human history that people yearn to actually love the place they live. He thinks people want an excuse to love America, and the promise of the founding can be that great unifier. While people can disagree on tax policy or immigration, we should at least agree these founders were onto something very big, bold, and beautiful, and we're recipients of that legacy. He points to Top Gun Maverick as evidence, a pro-Americana film that became the number one movie because it didn't pander much to identity politics and could have been made in the eighties or nineties.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!