Officer Christopher Bagley's Complete Testimony in the Charlie Kirk Shooting Investigation at Utah Valley University

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Day 1: Officer Testimony on Charlie Kirk Shooting at Utah Valley University

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Day 1: Officer Testimony on Charlie Kirk Shooting at Utah Valley University

7:39:33

Andrew Kolvet Breaks Down Day One of Tyler Robinson's Preliminary Hearing in Charlie Kirk Murder Case

Andrew Kolvet Breaks Down Day One of Tyler Robinson's Preliminary Hearing in Charlie Kirk Murder Case

1:16:55

Officer Bagley Testimony Reveals Sniper Position Evidence After Charlie Kirk Campus Shooting Incident at UVU

Officer Bagley Testimony Reveals Sniper Position Evidence After Charlie Kirk Campus Shooting Incident at UVU

40:18

Officer Christopher Bagley's Complete Testimony in the Charlie Kirk Shooting Investigation at Utah Valley University

Officer Christopher Bagley, a 26-year law enforcement veteran, provides detailed testimony about the September 10, 2025 shooting incident involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Bagley describes securing the Hall of Flags walkway during Kirk's speaking event, hearing a rifle shot at 12:23 PM, discovering evidence on the Losee Center rooftop including a disturbed gravel pattern consistent with a sniper position, and the subsequent investigation. His testimony reveals critical details about the crime scene, security protocols, evidence preservation, and the chaotic moments following the shooting that injured the conservative speaker before thousands of students. The cross-examination exposes gaps in campus security planning and challenges in the investigation.

Categories: Court Hearings
July 7, 2026

Officer Bagley's Background and Campus Familiarity

Officer Christopher Bagley brought 26 years of law enforcement experience to his testimony in the preliminary hearing. He had worked at the Utah Valley University Police Department for five years as a senior officer before the September 10, 2025 incident, following 13 years with the Utah County Sheriff's Office, six years with Springville City Police Department, and one year with Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office. His experience included specialized roles in K9, SWAT, motors, and detective work.

Bagley became intimately familiar with UVU's campus through daily patrols, training other officers, and using the university's extensive video surveillance system. He knew every classroom, entrance, exit, and the surrounding neighborhoods to the north and east of campus. This familiarity proved crucial when he needed to quickly navigate the campus during the emergency response.

The September 10, 2025 Event

Bagley arrived on campus at approximately 11:00 AM for an overtime shift to provide security for a special event featuring speaker Charlie Kirk. He had signed up for the shift knowing there would be a guest speaker, though he did not attend any briefing or receive operational plans for the event. Only six UVU officers were assigned to cover an event that would draw several thousand people to the campus courtyard and amphitheater area.

Upon arrival, Bagley was immediately assigned to secure the south end of the Hall of Flags walkway, a red brick pathway that runs above and adjacent to the outdoor amphitheater where Kirk would be speaking from beneath a white tent. People had been throwing objects down from the walkway toward the tent, necessitating the security presence.

The Shooting at 12:23 PM

While stationed on the Hall of Flags walkway, Bagley could see the right side of Charlie Kirk's shoulder as he answered questions beneath the tent. At precisely 12:23 PM, Bagley heard what he immediately recognized as a gunshot. He saw Kirk lean suddenly to the left and move further under the tent to the north side. The crowd of several thousand people began screaming and running in all directions.

Bagley's training allowed him to distinguish the sound as a rifle shot rather than a handgun - describing it as a longer, more violent bang or crackle sound coming from the east. He immediately left his post and attempted to descend the outdoor stairs between the Fugal building and the Hall of Flags, jumping over people who were lying on the steps or running upward in panic.

Initial Response and Crime Scene Assessment

Within approximately 30 seconds of the shooting, Bagley heard over the radio that officers had a shooter in custody near the tent. This initially led him to believe the threat had been neutralized and the shooter was close to Kirk's location. He shifted his focus to assessing injuries and began canvassing the courtyard area.

Bagley encountered a young person near a wheelchair who appeared to be convulsing on the second or third tier of grass, but the father confirmed it was a seizure unrelated to the shooting. Finding no other apparent injuries, Bagley began pushing people off the grass to preserve the crime scene, knowing evidence like shell casings might be present.

Discovery of the Empty Holster

As the chaos began to subside, Bagley noticed an empty pistol holster lying on the top tier of grass on the south side of the courtyard, near the Fugal building. He pointed this out to Chief Long, who was nearby. At that moment, Bagley's perception shifted - he realized the sound he heard was more consistent with a rifle shot than a handgun, despite the empty holster suggesting a pistol might have been involved.

Looking up from where the holster lay, Bagley had a direct line of sight to the Losee Center building to the east. The four-story building with its gravel rooftop stood in the exact direction from which he believed the shot had originated. He decided to investigate the rooftop immediately.

Investigation of the Losee Center Rooftop

Bagley proceeded through the Sorenson Center, climbing four flights of stairs to reach the fourth level of the Losee building. He then accessed the outdoor public stairway on the south side of the building between the Losee Center and the Computer Science building. At 12:44 PM - approximately 21 minutes after the shooting - he hopped over a guardrail that served as a natural barrier to the rooftop.

About 10 to 15 feet west of the guardrail, in the gravel, Bagley discovered a red and black screwdriver that appeared out of place. He did not touch or disturb this potential evidence. More significantly, he observed a distinct disturbance in the gravel on the southwest side of the roof that appeared consistent with someone lying in a prone sniper position.

The Gravel Disturbance Pattern

The disturbance Bagley observed showed impressions that suggested elbows, knees, and feet - the typical contact points for someone lying prone with a rifle. This position provided a direct line of sight to the white tent where Charlie Kirk had been speaking. The southwest corner of the Losee building rooftop offered an unobstructed view down into the courtyard, though part of the view was blocked by the Sorenson building's white roof.

Bagley noted that despite the clear indication someone had been lying in position on the roof, he found no spent shell casings - which would typically be ejected by many types of rifles. He searched the area thoroughly, looking over the edge and checking to ensure the gravel wasn't disturbed elsewhere, but located no casings or unshot ammunition.

Securing the Rooftop Crime Scene

Recognizing the significance of his discovery, Bagley immediately secured the rooftop crime scene with yellow police tape. He placed tape around the disturbed gravel area and at the natural barrier of the guardrail to prevent anyone except law enforcement from accessing the scene. He instructed a female county deputy sheriff not to allow anyone inside the crime scene without proper authorization, then left to review surveillance footage.

Video Surveillance Review

At approximately 1:00 PM, Bagley went to the UVU Police Department located in the Gunther Trade building on level three, directly south of the Losee building. There he accessed the campus video surveillance system to review footage from the rooftop. The footage showed an individual running to the western edge of the roof, dropping down into what appeared to be a prone position in line with Kirk's tent, then standing up after the shooting and running northeast across the rooftop.

The individual then jumped from the northeast corner of the Losee building down to the grass below - a drop that would have required climbing over the roof's edge. Bagley had only viewed this footage twice since the incident and could not identify the individual's face, specific clothing markings, height, or weight from the video, though he described the person as not heavy-set and more of a skinnier build. He observed what appeared to be a long black object in the person's left hand as they ran, possibly covered with something like a towel or blanket, but could not definitively identify it as a weapon.

Northeast Drop Zone Investigation

After reviewing the video footage, Bagley returned to the scene to investigate where the individual had jumped from the building. He went to the northeast side of the Losee building and discovered a deep shoe impression embedded in the grass directly below where the person had dropped down. Looking up at the cement edge of the roof, he observed fresh scuff marks that had not been there previously, consistent with someone climbing down from the roof.

Bagley secured this second area with yellow crime scene tape, extending it around trees and down to the back sidewalk of the LDS Institute building to preserve any additional evidence. He instructed two uniformed Orem police officers not to allow anyone inside this crime scene except law enforcement or investigators.

Campus Layout and Access Points

The testimony provided detailed information about the campus layout crucial to understanding the incident. The outdoor amphitheater sits centrally on campus, surrounded by several major buildings: the Fugal building to the south, the Woodbury Business Building to the southeast, the Sorenson Center to the northeast, and the Losee Center to the east. The Hall of Flags connects buildings on the western side of the courtyard.

The LDS Institute building sits north of the Losee Center, with a multi-level parking structure directly west of the Institute building. This parking structure can be accessed via Campus Drive on the north end at level one, with an exit on level two at Heat Plant Road. The structure includes stairs connecting all levels and a tunnel to the Institute building. From this parking structure, it takes only a couple of minutes to walk to the courtyard area.

The neighborhoods to the north and east of campus are connected by streets including 800 South, 850 South (which runs parallel below 800 South), 600 West, 720 West, and 925 South. These streets form a horseshoe pattern: 850 South runs east-west, with 720 West forming the left side of the horseshoe running north-south, connecting at the bottom to 925 South, which wraps back around to 600 West on the right side.

Security Protocols and Limitations

The cross-examination revealed significant gaps in security planning for the event. Only six UVU officers were assigned to cover an event that drew several thousand attendees, despite advance knowledge that a high-profile speaker would be present. The officers carried Glock pistols but had no access to drones for aerial surveillance - drone capability only arrived after the shooting via Sergeant Cam Nelson from Provo Police Department.

No briefing materials, operational plans, or tactical coordination occurred before the event. Bagley did not attend any security meeting because upon arrival, he was immediately deployed to address the situation of people throwing objects from the Hall of Flags. No magnetometers or metal detectors were employed at entry points, and in Utah's open carry state, students and attendees were legally permitted to have firearms on campus.

Charlie Kirk had his own private security team present, and Bagley observed at least one armed security member on the Hall of Flags walkway with him before the shooting, plus several others in the crowd and near Kirk. However, there was no coordination mentioned between Kirk's security team and campus police.

Evidence Documentation and Forensic Analysis

Melissa Richards, the lead senior forensic examiner for the state of Utah, later photographed the rooftop scene at night. These photographs, admitted as exhibits, showed the disturbed gravel pattern more clearly than what could be captured in daylight photos. The nighttime images revealed impressions suggesting a prone position with visible indications of where elbows, knees, and feet had pressed into the gravel, as well as an area where a weapon might have been laid down.

Evidence markers were placed at the scene: a yellow tag numbered two marked the general area, and orange or red triangular markers indicated specific points of interest within the disturbed gravel pattern. A measuring tape was used to document the dimensions of the scene, though Bagley was not present during that measurement process.

The red and black screwdriver found on the rooftop was also photographed with an evidence marker (yellow tag number five), though the significance of this item remained unclear. No fingerprint analysis of the empty holster found in the courtyard was mentioned, and Bagley did not take custody of that item, leaving it where he found it.

Timeline Discrepancies and Documentation Issues

Bagley prepared his supplemental police report either the same day or the day following the incident while events were fresh in his memory. However, the report contained notable omissions. He did not document the direction from which he heard the shot (east), did not mention thinking it might have come from the Losee building, and did not describe the long black object he observed in the video footage of the suspect fleeing the rooftop.

His body camera footage, which began while he was at the Hall of Flags, ran for 27 minutes and 35 seconds, ending while he was still on the Losee Center rooftop before he had finished securing the scene with crime scene tape. The battery apparently died, and he did not recharge or replace it during the remainder of his shift, which extended until approximately 9:00 PM that night.

Gaps in the Investigation

Several investigative questions remained unresolved in Bagley's testimony. He could not confirm whether anyone had accessed the Losee Center rooftop between the time the suspect jumped off and when he arrived to secure the scene. While he reviewed video footage to observe the suspect's actions, he did not check surveillance to see if others had been on the roof during that gap period, leaving open the possibility that evidence could have been disturbed.

Despite the clear disturbance in the gravel suggesting someone had occupied a prone shooting position, no bullet casings were recovered from the rooftop. No unspent ammunition was found. Bagley was not aware of any bullet being recovered from the scene, either on another nearby roof or elsewhere on campus. The empty holster in the courtyard was never fingerprinted to his knowledge, and he did not know what happened to it after he observed it.

By the end of September 10th at 9:00 PM when Bagley left campus, no one to his knowledge had identified who the shooter was. When he returned the next morning and worked throughout that day, the shooter's identity still remained unknown to his knowledge. The investigation would apparently continue beyond those initial crucial hours without a clear suspect identification.

Officer Experience and Qualifications

Bagley's extensive background proved relevant to his observations and conclusions. His 26 years in law enforcement included approximately 600 hours of POST (Police Officer Standards and Training) Academy training covering report writing, arrest control, and other foundational skills. He had worked in specialized units including K9, SWAT, and motors, and had detective experience.

While working with SWAT teams, Bagley gained familiarity with snipers and their tactics, though he was not himself a trained sniper. This background knowledge informed his recognition of the disturbed gravel pattern as consistent with a prone sniper position. His experience with various firearms allowed him to distinguish between the sound signatures of handguns versus rifles - a distinction that proved crucial when he heard the shot that struck Charlie Kirk.

The Chaotic Response

The immediate aftermath of the shooting demonstrated the challenges of responding to an active shooter scenario in a crowded public space. Within 30 seconds, officers had taken someone into custody near the tent where Kirk had been speaking, leading to initial confusion about whether the actual shooter had been apprehended. This person taken into custody was in the courtyard area, close to Kirk's location, but not in the area where the empty holster was discovered.

The crowd's panicked reaction made movement difficult for responding officers. People were screaming, running in all directions, lying on stairs, and creating obstacles for Bagley as he tried to descend from his position on the Hall of Flags. This chaos persisted for several minutes before order could be restored and systematic evidence preservation could begin.

By the time Bagley reached the tent, Charlie Kirk had already been placed in an SUV and removed from the scene - likely for medical treatment and his safety. The rapid evacuation meant Bagley never directly observed Kirk's injuries or condition, focusing instead on securing evidence and searching for other potential victims.

Forensic Photography Challenges

The photographs taken at the scene illustrated the difficulty of capturing certain types of evidence. The daylight photograph of the disturbed gravel on the Losee Center rooftop did not adequately show the impressions Bagley observed with his naked eye. The disturbance was more visible and distinct in person than what the camera captured in that lighting.

The nighttime photographs taken by Melissa Richards proved more effective at documenting the scene. The different lighting conditions, possibly combined with photographic techniques, made the patterns in the gravel more apparent. These images showed not just the general disturbed area but specific impression points that suggested human contact - the elbows, knees, feet, and possible weapon placement that Bagley had observed.

The aerial photographs and drone footage admitted as exhibits provided crucial context about the campus layout, building positions, and sight lines. However, the defense noted that the source and date of some photographic exhibits remained unclear, with Officer Bagley unable to identify who took certain overview photos or how recent they were relative to the September 10th incident.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!