Vahalla VFT Humiliates Himself Attacking Candace Owens' Source. NEW Info in Case!

What up everybody? What up everybody? My apologies on the on the on the delay. Um that was very weird at like 12:58 which is 2 minutes before I was supposed to go live. Um my Wi-Fi just went out. It was very weird. My my my second monitor shut down. It was just really really weird. I don't know what that was about. I don't know what that was about. Um, but we're back up and running. Hopefully that does not happen in the middle of the live. Um, yeah, let let's go ahead and hop right into this, man. Um, it's been a couple of days. Hope everybody had a great break. I personally do not celebrate Christmas. Um, so I've actually been doing research over the past couple of days. I've also uh been been traveling, so I've been simultaneously doing multiple things, multitasking. Uh, but there's something I want to address. But before we do that, uh, let me go ahead and get quite a few disclaimers out of the way. Shout out to my Patreon members. I do not I I do not shout you all out enough. Um, I appreciate you all a lot more than you realize, a lot more than you understand. We are now at seven over 7,000 Patreon members. And before anybody feels like I I'm getting rich, that's not the case. Only maybe 3% of those 7,000 people are actually paid members. But that's a that that's good enough for me. Like that's the fact that so many people have joined um makes my heart warm and I just want to shout you all out because it means the world to me cuz I do this full-time now. And so any way that you all support me means a lot. Which brings me to my next point. This may be my best brand design as of yet, allegedly, which is the alleged hoodie. Allegedly hoodie. It just came in today and I'm very impressed with the material. Crazy, right? So, I want to shout this out at the beginning. Uh, for those of you that have already ordered, a lot of you all have already ordered this hoodie. So, let me know what you think about the quality. I'm I'm I'm very impressed. I'm very happy with it. I'm 6'3, 200 lb. I'm slim fit and a large. Fits me perfectly. For those of you that are wondering how to gauge what size to order, link is in the description to both my Patreon and uh my merch store. if you want if you all want to support. Now, I'm gonna make this this clear. This will be one video. I will be covering this in one video and then we're going to get back to the evidence because of those of you that are saying, "Don't get distracted, Diddy. Don't start attacking. Don't don't get caught up in the mix of all y'all content creators going at each other." I want to point out hypocrisy. I want to point out some weird things that I've noticed so that you all can be able to point it out and and peep it out as well. And you all help me peep out certain things, too. All right. So, I want to make sure that I say the reason why I'm doing this. All right. So, I'm going to do this in this live and then we're going to get right back to it. Brian the auditor will officially be back on the channel tomorrow. We have quite a few things to break to you all and I don't think I've let you all down yet. whenever Brian has come on the channel. I think you all would agree with that. Brian will be back on tomorrow. It won't be a live, but it will be a pre-recorded video. And I do believe you all would appreciate some of the things that he has found um with some of these characters that are playing um that are involved in this Charlie Kirk incident. Uh which brings me to my point. I I want to mention the fact that it's come out that apparently the guy who took the SD card out of uh the camera that was behind Charlie Kirk, which I still hold I reserve to hold my position as to why I believe that is. It's highly suspicious and I believe that if we was to see what that camera footage revealed, there's a very high chance that we see that Charlie Kirk either either wasn't actually powpowed or what happened to him was a lot closer. And they don't want us to see that. That's what I believe is going on here. So, I want to state that for the record. I think that's pretty obvious to me. If they pres present some evidence that uh proves the contrary, I'm willing to pivot. But until I see that, that's what I believe. I either believe he wasn't powpowed that day, and I believe that camera footage right behind directly behind him will prove that, or he actually was, but it was a lot closer, and it's going to completely dismantle the Fed's case. That's what I believe is going on. But it's come out that the guy who took the SD card out, I guess apparently is actually related to one of the defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson. So, I'm going to be looking into that tomorrow. I'm probably going to be dropping two videos tomorrow. That will not be a part of my Brian video tomorrow. Brian the auditor. Those will be two separate videos. But, I'm just giving you all heads up that I am working on other things. Which, by the way, those of you that care about content outside of the Charlie Kirk case, I'm working on a pretty big video that I hope will be able to premiere by the end of next week, if not early the following week. Right. I've just hired a researcher to help me with that video. So, I'm working on that. I I don't want to tell you what it's about just yet. Uh, but it's completely unrelated to this. It's also come out been brought to my attention that there's a high chance that one of the defense attorneys, I don't know if it's the same person that's related to the guy that took the SD card out. Apparently, this guy, one of the defense attorneys, was actually potentially present on the campus that day, which is which would be wild if that's the case, right? So, stay tuned for that as well. Um, yeah. So, I just want to give you all a heads up. There are other things that I'm looking at. I'm not getting distracted with with these side quests, but this is kind of important. All right. Is that everything? Brian. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. I want to also let you all know. Well, first let's let's go ahead and just pull this up. I I I want to pull up this image. I want to pull up this image. Let's pull up this image. So, two weeks ago, I posted this. Do you all remember this? Let me move this out the way for now. Two weeks ago, I said, "Beware of some of these newer content creators who have seemingly come out of nowhere since the Charlie Kirk incident, claiming to be quote unquote experts that the algorithm is appearing to support despite their small channel size. Please pray, please pay close attention to the direction that they take many of you in because there will be certain explanations to corruption that they will never mention or entertain. You then need to ask yourself why. More to come in due time. We plan to expose all things on this channel. This is still up on my YouTube channel. The reason why I'm sharing this is because the things that I'm going to be saying today about Valhalla, Valhalla, VFT. Um, I'm glad I've had more time to reflect because I I plan to come with a completely different I originally planned to come with a completely different energy which may still come out in this in this live, but I've simmered down just a little bit. But the reason why I say this is because whatever disagreements I or other people may have with Valhalla's approach over the past three days or so, um, he's not going to be the only one. There's a reason why I made this this post two weeks ago. There's going to be a couple of other ones that I suspect will be doing the same thing. That's why I say just play pay close attention and me too. Me included. pay close attention to me and just pay attention to the direction I take you in because there are certain things like I said two weeks ago that they will not entertain that that that it's just what it is. And when I say small channels, some of these people have bigger channel sizes than I do. I don't mean that as a knock. What I mean is small channel sizes compared to some of these other people that that that are covering it. Obviously Candace being the big dog because she has a massive massive following. So I want to show the credibility here. Like I said this two weeks ago that that some of these directions that people are going to take us in, you you got to pay close attention. And again, he's not the only one. There's a couple of more people. I also want to address people in my comment section saying, um, please stop with the division. Stop fight. Listen, I I get it. I understand you mean well. So, I'm not I'm not saying this to attack you. I don't know these people, though. I'm not friends with these people. And I just want to give you all a little bit of insight. And I've said this in another live and I'm going to say it again. You all are the consumers. And I don't mean that in a bad way. What I mean is for those of you that are not content creators, you all don't understand what it's like with some of these people. A lot of these content creators are narcissists. It's just the truth. I'm not saying and I mean that this is righteous anger or righteous frustration, right? Righteous judgment. Some of these people are are narciss narcissistic. they they act like they can only collab with certain people. And collab I don't mean like put other people on their platform. What I mean is if if the goal is to get to the truth, then it doesn't matter who you work with to get there. It doesn't matter who helps get to the next level, right? It's a collaborative effort. But if you pay attention to some of these content creators, they're very specific. And the last thing I want to say before we get into the specificities about this content creator, the last thing I want to say is um by default a lot of you all loved Charlie Kirk. A lot of you all love Charlie Kirk and a lot of you all because we're only human subconsciously just just automatically believe that a lot of these people are conservative if they're helping get to the quote unquote truth. I want to remind a lot of you all that they're not. Just because some of these people have t and I'm not even saying this about Valhalla in particular even though I don't believe he's conservative. I could be wrong about that. I'm just saying uh um generally speaking, just because someone is an expert in something and they're helping with this case does not mean that their politics align with Charlie. In fact, some of these people probably don't care one way or another what happened to Charlie, right? Some of this is about money. You're going to learn that. Some of this is about clout or attention. You're going to learn that. And you just decide that for yourself. And again, put me in that category as to if you believe that about me. I'm not excluded. I want you all to be able to see these things for what it is. All right? Some of these people are ultra progressive. Some of these people are what what do you call it? Libertarian, right? Which I'm not saying anything's wrong with being a libertarian. My point is don't just assume that people are conservative just because they're helping with this. Because the moment that a person in the pursuit of truth speaks out against something that hurts their feelings, you'll see their true colors, which we're about to get into with this content creator. Oh, I said I said that would be all. Here's one last thing. Um, for those of you that are saying, "Dees Christ is the most important thing. You're giving these other people like Candace Owens and others Charlie Kirk too much attention." Listen, I have no push back to that. That's fair. Well, I have no push back to the statement itself. This is all I would say. Please do not pretend like before, three months ago, my channel was about breaking down scriptures. It It wasn't. I'm not quite at the point where I'm comfortable enough to do that in public. My channel has been about exposing evil, which is why I've encouraged you all over and over for selfish and unselfish reasons. Please check out my other content because if you ask me, I believe we're going to get to the bottom of what happened that day. Sooner or later, but eventually, one way or another. But whenever that happens and this dies out and fades away, I don't want you all to have to make a huge pivot into the other content. I want you to all to be aware of the things that I've been doing. I've been making documentaries on this channel for four years now. Enough about me. Enough about me. Please hit the like button on your way in. I have quite a bit of notes. That's why I'm looking down. Um, let me make sure I say that this episode uh is not about necessarily defending Candace Owens, even though that will come up in this episode. Candace Owens can be critiqued. She is not above reproach. I will be critical of Candace at some point, I'm sure. This episode is not about defending Mitch, even though a little bit of that is going to come up to an extent in this episode as well. The purpose of this episode is the way in which you go about doing it. If you if you're trying to get to the bottom of this, it should come off as if you want truth, not like you're conceited and it's about you and and being full of yourself. That's what I'm saying. I'm not saying that for those of you that are saying he didn't he didn't attack Candace Owens. In my opinion, he did. In my opinion, he did. When you spend almost six hours drinking yourself to drunkenness, making demands, who are you to make any demand to anybody? You have until Friday to disavow what? to end this or I'm gonna drop the the bombshell. I'm gonna go scorch earth. Bro, the arrogance in that statement, she or anybody else don't have any obligation to do anything you say. And then it's a very interesting thing for you to do that because you know that she's on break and for you to announce that you have information, you already know that you want to release it anyways. So, when you know that you have the information already and you know that you're demanding something from someone who may or may not see this video and she's on Christmas break, you know, there's a good chance that you're going to be forced to release this information. Information that has nothing to do with the claim that he made. By the way, I put up a quote, what was it yesterday? The day before yesterday. I said I wasn't going to talk that loud. So, let me bring this a little closer. I brought up a quote yesterday that said, "When a crime is committed in hell, the witnesses will not be angels." That is to say, or at least I want to I want to amend that a little bit and say, when a crime happens in hell, the witnesses will not be angels unless they're fallen angels. Shout out to one of the commentators, somebody that commented to say that there are fallen angels in hell. Fair enough. There will be fallen angels in hell. Fair enough. The point is even criminals witness crimes too. Even people who have done horrific things witness witness crimes too. You do know that police officers a lot of their cos their criminal or their undercover informants or the CIS are criminals. As a matter of fact, the best ones are criminals. the people that are the hardest to trust, but they're of that world. It doesn't mean that what they saw, stick to what he saw. Disprove that. And if the man may not have seen it, and I'm all for it if he if if you're about exposing that he lied, I'm with you. I'm totally with you. But if you're you're pointing out his past, Brian Harpole, Valh Hall of VHT, from my understanding, I don't know you personally, brother, but I'm just I'm just not happy with this this this approach. because there's hypocrisy. Brian Harpo, from my understanding, you have defended. Let's go to the things that he said himself about the past, right? Because based on your logic, if a person has lied about their history, we shouldn't trust them. Not that we should be careful about trusting them. We shouldn't trust them. Okay. Brian Harpo, a person you've defended, didn't he lie about the drones? Did he not lie about the drones? So that means he's lied about the past. That's a verifiable lie. We shouldn't trust him. Because let's really get down to what this is really about. What you're really upset about. Some people have argued that, hey, he's upset that Candace Owens didn't make him her personal security guard or security member cuz he's he's asked her. He's he's he's offered her that service, I believe, for free. People have said he's upset that she she won't mention him or acknowledge him more. He's the top Green Beret on YouTube, so he feels that he should be acknowledged more. I don't know if that's true or not. People have went a lot of you all have sent me um some stuff that's come out, I guess, about his past. Maybe he's undercover. He's an undercover gay person. Maybe his wife used to be a stripper, which to his credit, he's he's addressed these things. He says that his wife was not a stripper. He says that his wife was some sort of oral technicians, which sounds like a commendable job. But to the gay rumors, he actually doesn't really ever denies it. He just actually quote unquote sarcastically says that it may be true and but it doesn't hurt his feelings that people go after him. My response to that is I don't care. I don't care. I don't think being homosexual makes you a bad person. But I do I do think it it's hypocritical if a person is lying about their past or not being honest about their past about their life while also calling out another person. I don't know if that applies here, but I I just want to acknowledge the fact that I've seen that you all a lot of you all have sent send me that information. I think that's a lowblow. I'm not going to go that angle. The brother has addressed it. Leave that where it is. Let's kick this off with and we're going to tie this back to what um Nate I believe is his real name from uh Valhalla VLT name is Nate. Let's go to something George Webb said and this is what I want to I'm going to tie this back to Nate by saying that it's all about delivery and it's it's it's very interesting that it almost seemed coordinated that it both of you are coming out around the same time, right? If we're about truth, we're about truth. Hello everyone. George Webb, Franklin County, Franklin County Court. George Webb, Franklin County Court. Why is this so important in the Candace discussion? Why is Franklin County Court so important in this Candace discussion? Why is it so important with Mitch, the person who has three lawsuits involved in 2023 in in May and June of 2023, which are lawsuits. We're we're about to get into some of the details, not a whole lot of it because I don't want to spend too much time on that, but we're going to get into some of the things that he's been accused of and what some of these people, not all of them, are refusing to talk about with these lawsuits, which by the way, a lawsuit is a lawsuit. It's not a conviction. It doesn't mean you're necessarily guilty of something. It's a lawsuit. Anybody can pick up a lawsuit. That's the hammer time. He goes hammer crazy. Ready? In June of 2023. Why all of this happening at this courtroom? Why is this courtroom so important? Well, first of all, it's shoe leather. First of all, it's shoe leather getting out and getting to the court of unfortunately, it's closed today. But if you look at the lawsuits that are filed in May of 2023 and June of 2023, you'll find a very interesting thing. You'll find the court awarding one of Mitch's ex-wives. This is the big whistleblower that Candace is is putting so much stock in. Remember, we say, Candace, it's a federal informant. It's a federal informant. They're trying to get you off Doge. They're trying to get you off Dupant. Given the last mafia ultimatum to Charlie before his murder, they don't want you to do the Doge audit. They're going to try to introduce a federal informant to get you thinking about something else. That's why we're in Franklin because the federal folks in introduced this federal informant, Mitch, but there's going to be three lawsuits that are going to be presented tonight. Alex Jones is going to present it. Laura Loomer's going to present it. Everybody's going to pile on Mitch, right? >> Laura Loomer. [laughter] Okay. >> Everybody's going to say Mitch is a bad guy. Of course, he's a bad guy. They wouldn't have put him in to the case to get Candace away from Doge and get Candace away from DuPont. They wouldn't have put him in if they didn't know he was a bad guy. They wouldn't have put him in if they didn't know these three lawsuits existed. They wouldn't have put him in if they didn't know the three lawsuits existed. The three lawsuits are going to show domestic violence. Three lawsuits are going to show the uh garnishment of $400,000 $415,000. They're going to show Mitch having $450,000 one day in the bank account and next day having zero. >> And I'm going to I'm going to give you what someone else I don't know what's true. What someone else has said as a counterargument because again, you're only hearing one side. Again, this isn't about defending Mitch. The dude may be a horrible person. I don't care to defend him. I don't know him. I don't care to be friends with him. If these things are about him are true about his past, he's a horrible person. George Nate, what about what he said, bro? He said he saw someone, which Candace Owen said in real time. She don't know if it's true or not. She says she can confirm based on metadata that he was where he said he was. I think that alone gets you in the door. She said she cannot confirm that. Then she asked him to give a percentage. And to Mitch's credit, who may be a horrible person, may have lied about his past, I don't know. But to his credit, he says on the episode, maybe I didn't see him. Maybe they had a what what do you call it? A not a stunt double. There's another name for it. Maybe they got another person that looked just like them. I don't know. Why do you keep talking about his past? Okay, great. And and let me address this. When you say, "Well, if a person has lied about who they are, the things that they've experienced, shouldn't that mean you shouldn't trust what they're saying now?" It means that you should be skeptical. It means that you should tread lightly, which you should do with everybody anyways, which by the way, let me tell you where I agree with Valhalla. I agree that if you're raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for a person specifically for the reason of what he's been through and it turns out that what he's been through is a lie, I agree with him there. Nate and I on the same page there. But I'm not about to demand anything from Candace Owens like I'm above her. While in the same note talking about um how to treat women the right way while also demanding that Candace do something for you because you said so. Talking about a man's past, which if if he's done this once again, I need to keep repeating this because somebody's going to clip this. If a man is guilty of that, that makes him a bad man, a bad husband, a bad father. I'm with you. 100% with you. But you can't sit up there and talk about that while sitting there with a person that's bragged about having 15 felonies. The irony. But we're going to get to those clips. I'm getting ahead of myself. Let's see the nonsense that George is about to say. Which, by the way, George was just on the podcast. Had a great interaction with him. Didn't realize until after he left that he's super pro- Israel. I didn't know that when he was here. I probably would have said I had him on, but probably would have had a conversation with him about that to understand his angle there. Uh, and also don't support the fact that George is blocking a lot of people who disagree with him. I don't support that either, which Nate has also been doing that too, but we're going to get there. And they're going to show Mitch going nuts going over in this town where he lives, going over and whacking his wife's door open with a hammer. If that's what it's going to show, it's going to look really bad. Candace, here's your chance. Disavow Mitch now. Say, "Hey, I got fooled. George Webb got fooled way back when." Pike with a federal informant. Now's your chance. Say, "I got fooled." Federal informant has nothing to do with Doge. Has nothing to do with Charlie Kirk's death. Has nothing to do with Deont. Here's your chance now to say, "They fooled me." Okay, they fooled you. So what? We're going to go back to Doge. We're going to go back to Deont. Forget this. Forget this. This doesn't matter. Now, this is where I got the biggest issue, and I have to give credit to another YouTuber that I I have not seen a lot of his content, but a lot of you all have sent me some of his stuff, and I just haven't had time to get to it. But I did see a clip of him saying this, a YouTuber by the name of Lionel Nation, I believe I'm saying it correctly. Forgive me if I am not. He made a great point. He said, "If you if you listen to these people who are responding to Candace, which everybody has a right to question Candace, that that's not my position as if you don't, but at least make sense and be consistent here." Notice what they're saying. They're saying stop looking over here. They're not saying go look. If if it's nothing over there, fine. There's nothing over there. Or look over there and look over here at the same time. That's not what's happening. People like George is saying, and Nate to an extent, stop looking over there altogether. Why? If she finds nothing, if it turns out that this man is lying, now to Nate's credit, when it comes to raising money for him and it turns out he's lying, that's different. But if you're someone like a George and Nate to an extent, why are you saying alltogether stop looking? What? Why? Why should I stop looking all together? Let me look into this and see if there's nothing there because here's the biggest thing and I'm getting ahead of myself, but I'm so passionate right now. Don't forget everybody. It hasn't been debunked. [laughter] You're talking about the man's past. Great. Let's say he's the most horrible human being ever to live. What about what he said? Why have you not debunked that? Brian Harpole showing that he booked a plane ticket. It's not showing that he actually went to where the plane ticket was supposed to take him. It doesn't show that he was actually there. Again, we're going to get there because Candace Owens has responded on Instagram. I'm going to show you all that video clip as well, but Erica Kirk's alibi has yet to be proven or shown. Just easily show it and this could be over. But instead, not saying that it's Nate, not saying that it's George because I don't know if it applies to them, but you got people like Gary from Paramount Tactical, which we're going to get to that secretly working with TPUSA and they're failing in the process of debunking these things. But the feds know what Mitch did. The feds know what happened in this courtroom, and you're going to see that tonight. All the Fed sloppers are going to be out tonight. All the Fed sloppers are going to be out. You're gonna see uh Gary with Paramount. There's gonna be some really great true believers that are get sucked in here, too. People who really care about our country, really fight for our country, which is Valhalla is going to get sucked into this. But you're going to have Laura Loomer. You're going to have everybody who, you know, did every kind of Fed oping on Candace tonight. All Candace needs to do to avoid the pylon, just say, "Hey, Mitch was a fed. Mitch was a fed. I got fooled. We're moving on." So, from Pasco, Washington, beautiful Pasco, Washington. Beautiful Franklin County. You're going to see it all tonight. The lynching is going to happen. There's the jail right over there. The lynching, the electronic lynching of Candace Owens is going to happen tonight if she doesn't say this doesn't matter. >> [laughter] >> when I listened to this the first time I said [laughter] the lynching, huh? Okay. Okay. Uh listen, man. Um in fair, let let me say this first. George. Um, it's a fair point to say that there's a chance that the feds could have sent this person to discredit Candace in her investigation. I agree with you. And if that is the case, I agree with you that Candace should come out, admit that. Don't give him the money and just keep just keep on with the keep on. But the nerve of you to use the term electronic lynching when you know that you're referring to a so-called black American. You people that hop in the comment section and say, "De don't make this about race." What are you talking about? I'm not even going to address that foolishness. That is the craziest thing to be saying, bro. There is a there's a better term to be using than lynching. There will be no lynching taking place in 2025. You know that that's not the proper term to use. Were you trying to strike a nerve? Because it worked. Because it worked. That's not That's not cool, bro. And and and according to some people, I don't know, and I'm not co-signing this, some people have said that Valhalla VFT used the same language. I don't know know if that's true. I don't know if that's true. And I want to say this again for the record, the guy Mitch, I didn't enjoy listening to him on on Candace's podcast. For the record, he was long- winded. um you know he's not the best storyteller you know but that doesn't mean that he's a liar but George if you if you want to speak and use language like that you could have used that while you were speaking to me on my podcast man you know so let me let me tell you really why I believe that Valhalla in particular is upset because this is what it's really about he's upset that anyone could even entertain the idea. So, this is for those of you that are saying he didn't attack Candace. I believe that he was upset with Candace because of the clip I'm about to play for you. Because anybody could entertain the idea or the notion that someone in the military could collectively get together and conspire to commit a crime that results in the unaliving of an American citizen, let alone an American citizen on the level of a Charlie Kirk or who at the impact of a Charlie Kirk. Really, bro? That's your That's your position? Now, I want to be I want to be clear as if I'm not human. I get from your perspective because you served and I appreciate your service, brother. I do. But for you to dis uh uh uh uh you know completely not even acknowledge or disregard that's the word to disregard the possibility you lose credibility in in the process. This is what he said >> opportunity. Um and this is also why I took this story that Candace Owens put out so seriously. The idea that the US military, not just the US military, but service members, people serving in this country, the type of person that signs up is willing to go to war, put their lives, put their lives on their I had I had friends and teammates that did not come back from war. I had friends and teammates that came back dismembered from war. And so when I see a story come out that insinuates that those people, the people I served with who signed up on the dotted line, willing to risk their lives, get their lives, sacrifice, deploy for six to nine months at a time, be away from their their wives, their childrens, their husband. The insinuation that those people would be willing to assassinate at a unit level, an organizational level, would be willing to plan, operate, and assassinate an American citizen, an American patriot like Charlie Kirk is absolutely disgusting. And it's spitting in the [ __ ] face of every veteran, every soldier that came before me and my dead [ __ ] friends and teammates. That insinuation. And that's why I took this and sorry, I'm ranting a little bit here. That's why I took this entire thing so [ __ ] personally, as did all the veterans, because it's absolutely a [ __ ] disgusting accusation to begin with. So anyway, that got a little long-winded, but oh, and if you think is annoying, then guess what? You are the first and only person That's going to get banned. That's it. That's how it goes. We We do maybe one every two to three weeks. Have your [ __ ] gun. You don't like it, get the [ __ ] out. >> So, yes, I will support the US military. I'll support you. Your sons and daughters joining. If you don't like it, [ __ ] get the [ __ ] out. Go. Anyway, >> and boom. There you have it. There you have it. So, here's my question to Nate. I support the military. I I support the idea of the military, but to pretend as if corruption, news flash, corruption happens everywhere on all levels. In the rest, in the service industry, right, in the dancing industry, in the sports industry, in the entire entertainment industry, there's corruption everywhere. Why? Why does being a part of the military make you some sort make you exempt somehow? No, Nate, I have a question to you directly. If you see this clip and something tells me you will. Do you know every single person in the military? Of course not. Did you serve with every single person in the military? Of course not. I I I hate to hear that and I send my condolences to what happened to your friends who served, man. But to pretend like the investigation here is specifically referring to your friends is disingenuous and just is dishonest, bro. And honestly, to me, it comes off like a straw man. That's what this is really about. You can defend Brian Harpo, who is a proven, verifiable liar, but that's all right. while also def going for going for uh Mitch's background, which by the way, let's get into Mitch's background. Let's just pull up a little bit as you sit there with that person who allegedly has multiple felonies that he's bragged about. Uh talking about another person who has felonies, it's is or or has lawsuits. I don't even know if the man has been convicted of these crimes, but let's uh let's go to this is Benton County. It says Mitch Snow, a father's Let me make sure you all can see this. Mitch Snow, a father's defiant stand against corruption, a corrupt system exploiting our children. Let me make sure that I say for the record all the purpose of me showing you all this is to show you that there's another side. There's another argument. Not that this is fact, not that this is true. I don't know. That's the whole purpose of an investigation and due process. I don't know. But it's a bit disingenuous, which I'm going to get get here get to this a little bit after this article to just simply virtue signal by saying any man that hits on a woman, yeah man, we all agree with you, brother, but we also know that women lie. We know that men lie and women lie. Don't pretend like just because you see that it's a possibility, it automatically means it happened. That virtue signaling is just as disgusting to me. It says here, "In a shadowy underbelly of Benton County, Washington, rumors cast a disabled special forces veteran as a menacing spectre, a rogue assassin commanding a secret network of lethar lethal operatives. Right. Branded a mastermind of unaliving and mayhem. He's accused of orchestrating um death threats against judges, prosecutors, and his ex-wife in a chilling plot to dominate his divorce proceedings that have been now ongoing for 9 years. Sensational court claims depict him as a cold-blooded conspirator wielding his military past to terrorize the innocent with imaginary biker gangs and undocumented assassins at his bet and call ready to strike from the shadows. Let me let me jump down here a little bit. This is the story of Mitchell Snow, a father whose fight to save his son Nathan. The irony there has exposed a grotesque network of corruption that thrives on the exploitation of our most vulnerable. It says a father's ordeal against a corrupt cabal. Mitchell Snow's saga began with a divorce filing to protect Nathan from is it Laney? Laney Snow cousin to a former Kenowick mayor Don Britain. What should have been a swift intervention to safeguard a child spiraled into a decade of massive misconduct as an anonymous whistleblower attest blatantly obvious for any trained investigator to discover. The evidence is staggering. Again, I don't co-sign this. I'm just reading you all that there's an opposing side, which makes it an investigation. Depraved abuse. Laney starved Nathan since birth, leaving him emassiated with lifethreatening cardiac issues by 2023, requiring compression garments to survive. She drugged him with cough syrup, melanoning, and sleeping pills, caused genital yeast infections through inappropriate contact four times daily for seven years, and slept naked in his bed, claiming it loving, trusting, and consensual. Dr. Lane diagnosed SA and trauma confirmed by Dr. Cat Catalona Lano Seattle's Children's who debunked Lany's um condition excuse Laney's intent was to frame Mitch Mitchell for child SA manipulating medical reports to shift blame yet records yet records confirm infections only occurred in her custody. Laney hired 14 third parties to stalk, harass, attach, attack, vandalize, and attempt to unalive Mitchell and and and Na and Nathan. Oh, wow. Including three assaults in Richland Police's parking lot and five swatting incidents to provoke police into unaliving Mitchell. She admitted to holding a revolver to the head and using dogs to quote unquote punish Nathan for asking for food, theft, and bribery. Laney stole $415,000 $415$500,000 from Mitchell's savings in 401k bribing judges Jackie Sheia Brown, Joe Burroughs, Alex Estrom, Cameron Mitchell, Jackie Stam, and Commissioner Commissioner Andrew Howell alongside prosecutors, deputies, and attorneys to secure her immunity. She confessed to delivering funds to Burough's chamber chambers with no record of the money leaving and boasted of theft pro fraud and intent to harm without fear or pro of prosecution. Laney accused Mitchell of 50 capital crimes. Her self-inccriminating admissions contrast starkly with the absence of any tangible evidence against Mitchell in 10 years as conspirators recycle each other's baseless allegations as proof. Let me say once again, I don't know if any of what I just read is true or not. I don't know. The purpose of that is to show you that there is an other side. All right. Another thing that was a turnoff is the way in which Valhalla titled his video. It came off as um possessive. The the the fourth um Wuka story is over is how he titled his video. What are you talking about over? Who gets to decide that? Oh, if it's about the military, that's what you mean. If it's about the military, stop looking into that. Stop entertaining that. Okay, I see what you're saying. Have you disproven what the man said? If you have, I I'm with you. I'm I'm I'm on the side of truth, brother. But simply just saying if it if it had to do with the military, stop entertaining that it's not even possible for it to be true. What? Attacking fans that disagree with you and calling all of them abusers because they disagree doesn't help. The only people saying this are abusers themselves. I want you to look for every comment, every single person you see commenting this. These are abusers. These are abusers right here. >> I'm not an abuser and I disagree with you. >> This abuser, Robert, that's an abuser. And that's why they don't think this is a big deal. I do. Let me be very clear. This is the only episode I'm doing on this. This will be a oneandone. I will show you enough to know everything you know need to know about this man. I've been asked to come on a bunch of big channels. Al Jones wanted to have me on today. I said, I'm not coming on today. I need to do this episode. I'm not going to go on anybody's channels. And you know why? Because I don't want this to be about me. I'm not trying to build notoriety. I'm not trying to build the story. I'm not trying to make it about me. I'll tell you. And all the men in this chat will tell you. Shout out to Project Constitution. Project Constitution is where I got this clip from. Uh, let me just say that Nate, if you haven't been able to pick this up yet, we're just trying to get to what truly happened that day. And I'm willing to, even if it means disagreeing with Candace, entertain the idea and the possibility that that Charlie Kirk is alive. I've been saying it for two months, two and a half months, and I'm sticking with it until I see absolute proof or no absolute proof or have reason to believe otherwise. When you're making statements like you turned down these podcast and it just buys into what I'm saying about some of these these content creators, bro, it is about that when you're doing six-hour lives. I'm not knocking content creators who want to go live that long. God bless you. I'm just saying I can't do it. That's way too much time for me. My voice will go go horse and I got other things to do as well. But it almost comes off to some people like it's about the money, bro. when you know an hour or two of of of your sometimes even 30 minutes is really about the investigation itself and a lot of that time is really responding to super chats. That's how a lot of people are feeling about it, right? And I'm I'm I'm going to just say give a push back to some of the consumers too. If you all are about truth, man, you you you can't be 90 95% of you can't be in the comment section calling out people when they pivot, which I'm proud of, but then the next live 10,000 of you are watching their content. It's not showing that person or that content creator that you're not going to settle for BS. The power is in the people, and that applies to me as well. When I pivot, or if I was to ever pivot and start feeding y'all nonsense that don't make sense, call me out on it. Right. So, let's see. Another great question that I have for a lot of people, and I wonder if you all have thought about this. Why so much attention on Mitch? What I mean by that is, okay, let's say that Mitch is is full of BS, right? Let's say that he's full of BS. Okay. So, what why is it, and let me get this off the screen. Why is it, cuz I don't see any of these people asking this question, you can spend so much time trying to disavow Candace from going to this angle. Why do we have so many This is the question we should be asking. Why do we have more information about this person Mitch Snow about his past about his history where he was and what he did than we do about Tyler Robinson is and Lance combined? Does no one find that weird? Does no one find that weird? Right. Why are we not asking those questions? You we're digging into Mitchell Snow's backstory. Let's try to find out about Tyler. Let's try to find out about the people that was there. Right. And I also just want to say for the record, it doesn't help when the name of the channel Where is that even at? Do I even have that? It doesn't help when the name of the channel is Valhalla and we all remember when Cash Mattel got up there and said that it took them 33 hours to find Tala Robinson which was a very specific number that stood out to most of us the moment he said it and then he said that Charlie Kirk I'll see you in Valhalla. Many of us was like you'll see him where? So, this is just a message to Nate, bro. Like, I I I hear you say that you support Candace and you you witter and and all this that and the third, but it's giving people other vibes. That's all. It's just giving people other vibes. And it just makes us believe, which is why it's relevant for me to make an entire video about it. It just makes us believe who all is a part of the SCOP, right? Who all is a part of the SC? Especially when your last live was 3 hours 33 minutes and 30 seconds. I'm just saying, bro. It just, you know what I mean? I'm not making any claims here, but I'm sure how you can understand how that can come off a certain way, you know, especially when this person is believed to be a Freemason. That's all. That's all, you know. So, let me get to the next video clip. I want to show you all something. So, Candace Owens responded to a couple of things. And let me see if I can find the clip of Here it is. Check Check this clip out right here. This is the guy Gary from Paramount Tactical. And I want you all to take a listen to what he said >> in his chat when he was even going over the fort what to thing to begin with like a week and a half ago or whatever it was. He's seeing the same exact he's experiencing the same thing that I'm experiencing and that is as soon as you go off script and the script consists of anything except for the official narrative like they come after you in ways like there's guys trying to say oh look we're going to do background check on you like search ways dude hold on but that doesn't make sense though bro like like what what what the official narrative the official narrative is that Tyler Robinson pow pow Charlie Kirk what are you talking about that's the official narrative Bro, we don't we don't believe that. You do. Gary, you do. From my understanding, you are against those of us that are entertaining all of these other possibilities. Am I wrong? So, when Nate When you say that Nate from Valhalla um is is is going off script or he is not entertaining the official narrative. What? Credit to to Nate. He is questioning the official narrative. his his his classic 306 video that went viral, right? So, what official narrative are you talking about? I've had top secret clearances and other jobs. Like, I'm clean. I don't search your little hearts out. I don't take any money. I don't do any thing like that. Like, I'm I am not influencable. All right? I'm not period. All right? Unless you had my kids. The only time that I would get up here is if somebody had my family and was like, "If you don't say this, we're going to do something to your family because we have them in custody." Interesting. He said that he's not influencable. I don't know if that's a word, but I like the word. He says that he's not influencable, but then he proceeds to share some things, some text messages from a certain organization later in this clip that shows that, okay, maybe you're not influencable, but you're definitely getting information from other people. All right, that's probably the only way that you could get me to say something I don't believe. And that's the God's honest truth. [snorts] So Nate is going off script here. He's going against the Candace crowd and they're coming after him. And you know, he and I even talked about it. He's like, "This is crazy." I was like, "Nate, I've been dealing with this stuff for three months." >> The fact that y'all are even friends is a red flag to me. I'm not saying that you have to be be friends with people that you only agree with. No, that's not my position. My position is that Paramount Tactical has been going against the grain from the jump. And there's nothing wrong with going against the grain, but only if it makes sense. He won't even question the same red flags that we're questioning. Are you trying to get the truth or not? Or are you trying to throw us off? The moment I said anything about it, like there was no official narrative. I just said that the palm gun was [ __ ] And they were like, you're a Fed. You're paid by Israel. Like what? How what does that have to do with anything? That's when I knew it was all a scam. This whole thing is a scam. This whole thing is a scop. It's real, folks. We are being scoped. This is coordinated. This is sophisticated. Wake the f up. You are being played by who? >> And Candace is just at the centerpiece of it. I'm actually I'm open to entertain that though, Gary. In all seriousness, in all honesty, I'm open to understanding. I mean, entertaining that possibility, but I need some convincing and compelling information to go along with that. When you say that, like when you It's so vague. You're being played by who? What do you mean? Like are you saying that Charlie was actually hidden? It was by Tyler and they wanted us to think that it wasn't. What reason would the powers that be, you know, the deep state, you know, the the government, the military, whoever, what reason would they have to want us to believe that someone else other than Tyler did it? Or what reason would they want us to believe that Tyler did it? You know what I mean? Like, I'm not I'm not following it. That doesn't make sense. All right. Hopefully now he's about to read text messages from Andrew Kovit. [laughter] He's about to read text messages from Andrew Kovit that he wasn't supposed to read. And let's take a listen to what Andrew Kovit was telling him live. I think he was send Andrew Kov was texting him live during this live stream. Let's see what Andrew Kov told him to say >> just so you guys can see what's going on. Just so I can see what's going on here because that screen's small for me. But [clears throat] uh you know, I asked him, "Hey, do you have proof of this?" He says, "But it's worth saying Erica wasn't in some fort in Tucson. The internet's gone insane. She woke up next to Charlie on the 9th, went to the office with Charlie all day, woke him up from a nap before a fox hit, went to dinner with Charlie. Literally people are lunatics. And then the next one I will show you guys that one the continuation of this. Uh right here we have this one and then I'll show you an up close picture with the metadata that we have on the screen itself. Um, proof she was with her kids at 8:33 a.m. Pacific time, which again September, Arizona's on specific time. Uh, Pacific time. Let me just state for the record for those of you that haven't thought about this. This is supposedly a picture that Erica Kirk sent to Andrew Kovit. I don't know if Andrew Kovit would which you're going to hear Candace say this earlier and I don't 100% agree with Candace that Erica Kirk was I don't believe this is proven that Erica Kirk was telling Andrew Kovit to send this to Gary from Paramount Tactical but that wouldn't be farfetched to believe at all because Gary has been featured on Turnpoint USA's Charlie Kirk show. So we know that they're in cahoots with each other but this is a picture that Erica Kirk sent. There's a couple of interesting picture questions I have about this this this picture that I'm going to point out and I'm curious to hear what you all think. But the first thing is just because someone sent you Gary, just because someone sent you some metadata from this photo does not mean that it was Erica's metadata. That could have been the babysitter's metadata that was with the kids. because as we know she's been grieving so much that we've seen to you know all these fireworks and uh uh she's been on tour but she's grieving. Okay, Pacific time. Uh taking them for a walk. Apparently I wasn't supposed to share that. But anyways, point being is that's 8:33 a.m. It shows the date on that. Sorry, Andrew. I screwed that up, man. I was trying to run a podcast and do everything else. Um, but [laughter] hey, the text message the text message says don't share. Let me make this bigger. It says don't share. Oh boy. Oh boy. Well, I actually have a p a question about this picture. So Erica Kirk is obviously strategically covering the faces of her children, which her and Charlie did quite a few, you know, throughout their child, throughout their their marriage. They covered the faces, which some of us are a little bit more skeptical about it than others. Some people say, "Well, a lot of parents do that, especially if you're a very polarizing figure like Charlie Kirk." I get it. I understand it. It just don't help some of the conspiracy theories, if you will. It doesn't help help some of the actual theories that aren't conspiracies if you follow my drip. Right. Here's a question that I do have though. So, where is that picture at that I have? I have a picture. So, this is Erica Kirk. There's this is a post on Instagram that she made. It says, "I am not just your mother. I'm your first intercessor. I raise you to stand when it's lonely, to carry weight when the world tells you to run. Now, I'm not here obviously to attack any children. I would never do that. But I do have a question. How do you go? Cuz this this post was made. Let me move this banner out the way so you all can see it on September the 3rd. Now, I believe this is September the 3rd from this year. But even if you all want to argue that it's September the 3rd from 2024 supposedly, let me make sure I pull this up and I get this right. This baby was born, the boy was supposedly born May 14th, 2024 if I remember correctly. So even if it was 2024, giving them the benefit of the doubt, that would make this baby 4 months old, which means that this baby would be walking in 4 months, which would make it almost a miracle. So let's say that it's not 2024. And this picture is actually from September the 3rd, 2025, which is essentially what, a week before everything happened with Charlie, right? How did that baby go from that size to this again? It's let me let me go back so you can see it. That's a big old boy. Am I tripping? And I and I and I do want to be be honest here. I am open to the idea that there's a a logical explanation to this. I don't I don't mean to say this as a gotcha, but that seems to be a huge jump cuz either that boy was walking in four months or that picture is is that original picture I just showed you right here is from this year and he went from that again is to this which you don't see his face obviously, but you can see the body. That's very interesting. But anyways, anyways, Candace Owens responded. Let's see what Candace had to say because she saw this as well. Oh, wrong one. She responded on Instagram. This is what Candace had to say. Okay, I just have to jump on here to let you guys know that Andrew Kovette, the spokesperson for Turning Point USA, just got caught with his hand in the cookie jar trying to help orchestrate behind the scenes an alibi for Erica Kirk in Fort Wuga. Now, why is this crazy? For those that don't know the backstory here, essentially this guy Mitch, it was very compelling, said that he saw Brian Harpole leaving this meeting at Fort Wuka on September 9th. Now, I wanted to give him the platform after I verified where he was to tell his story, but he also had to include the part where he claims that he saw Erica Kirk the night before um also on Fort Wuka at Candlewood in Anne Suites. Okay. Now, truthfully, I put it at 50/50 because like I said on my show, I believe that he was at this like this meeting was significant and that it concluded. I felt really strongly that he saw Brian Harpole, but what's his memory like? Are you good at remembering faces? Did you just see another blonde and think that it was Erica Kirk? Genuinely, I thought it was at like 50/50 until until tonight where all of a sudden there were all these attacks regarding Fort Wuka. We didn't really know where they were coming from. You got people calling me insane. Alex Jones jumps into the feray. I'm like, what is happening right now? Why why does Fort Wuka have so many people triggered? Well, there were these YouTubers, Paramount Tactical is one of them, who was basically teasing like, "We're going to take down Mitch and show you guys that he's not a credible witness witness by going back and going through the files of his marriages and ex- relationships and to show you that he's an abuser." And this is going to be the end of Candace Owens's career. Like, totally weird and distracting. Like, I never told my followers that they should go marry Mitch. I have no idea what he was doing 20 years ago in a relationship. There were no convictions against him that I could find. Whatever the point is is like we didn't know where this was coming from. Everyone was like money must have just gone out. Like what is happening? Well, tonight was when they did their live to expose me and accidentally exposed Turning Point USA and Erica Kirk. Now, I'm going to show you the messages. Andrew Kovette was apparently live texting this guy Erica's alibi. Now, this means Erica is sending her alibi. Why wouldn't you just send it to me? Obviously, I didn't have a horse in the race of whether or not he saw you at the hotel. You could have just been like, "Here's where I was on September 8th, and this whole idea of you even being there would have gone away." Instead, she sends it to Andrew Kovette to send to these obscure YouTubers who are live, and it didn't click with them that Andrew Kovette did not want them to say that he was their source. So this guy just starts live reading the messages that are coming in [laughter] from Andrew Kovette where he proceeds to give an alibi that no one asked for. He's like, "This is what Erica was doing on September 9th." Okay, >> which is very similar to what Erica Kirk did when she said, "I've never been on any Egyptian planes. I was pregnant." That's a straw man. You're doing the same thing that Andrew Kov did here. No one said that, Erica. She didn't say that you were on the Egyptian planes. She said that the Egyptian planes have been following you and Charlie Kirk an unprecedented amount of times over the past what like four years or something crazy. So don't misrepresent the position or the argument to then debunk something that no one never said. >> The guy said he saw her on the ETH. It's kind of like the Brian Harpole where they're just like giving us alibis for times that we're not talking about. Again, I wasn't even necessarily pressuring them for an alibi. But he then proceeds to walk him through what Erica was doing on September 9th. And he's pretending like she doesn't even know what Fort Wuka was, even though her mother has a contract with the Department of Defense and would have obviously had to have been familiar with Fort Wuka, which is in her backyard and in Turning Point USA's backyard as well. Again, I would like to point out that no one said Erica was in some fort. No one said she was in Tucson, and no one said that they saw her on September 9th anywhere. So, I don't I don't know what this is. It's just weird. Like, it's like it's a totally strange thing to say. Again, when you have an easy pathway to just reach out to me and say, "Hey, I saw you mention something on September 8th. Here's where Erica was." Notice that's Erica's hand. That means Erica, the CEO of Turning Point USA, is directing the spokesperson of Turning Point USA, Andrew Kovette, to send her alibi to Paramount Tactical as he is like going into the history of Mitch and supposed to be exposing Mitch for being a serial abuser, but actually exposes turning point USA. Like, you just cannot make this up. This is like a PR nightmare. A crisis? Is this just a crisis? Wait, I'm gonna show you another message from Andrew. Being super discreet here. Look, I'm just saying the Tik Tockers are going to have a field day, okay? BB Netanyahu has not gotten these Tik Tockers out of control. They already are not feeling the vibes about Erica. Now you got this directing behind the scenes attacks on really Candace for whatever reason, but like sending them out to do videos about Mitch um and then you do this like false debunking when it's just like so like telling the truth is free. Like if you could just be like, "Here you go." It's going to lead people to ask questions and it's probably the opposite thing is going to happen where people are going to wonder if Mitch's memory was correct. And he did see Erica at Fort Wuka on September 8th in the evening as Charlie Kirk was touching down from Tokyo um into Los Angeles. So I'm just saying this is a PR nightmare. This is just turning point man. Not good. Not good. And let me make sure that I say this for the record. This live is not to say that the person Nate is not a good person. That that's not an attack on on on who he is as a human being. It's not. This is a direct response to the way in which he went about handling this because it just came off as extreme extremely, if I can get my words together, extremely distasteful, right? It came off as if the the number one goal wasn't to get to the truth, you know? I mean, I will literally disavow Candace Owens. Literally disavow Candace Owens. And we will become the most anti-Candace Owens podcast on YouTube overnight. If this is true, it'll get ugly. And and I won't lose, by the way. I will go so goddamn scorched earth and expose everything you guys could not possibly [ __ ] imagine if this is true. I need to see show me the gofundme. So to be fair because people will clip people out of context. To be fair to Nate I believe if I remember correctly because I'm not I'm just respectfully I'm not watching six hour a six hour live. I'm not watching a three and a half hour live. I'm just not doing it. I don't have the time to do it. But I believe he was specifically saying if it turns out that either the things about Mitch's past is true and or if it's true that she's created a GoFundMe, which he mentioned there at the end of that clip. If these things are true, then he will disavow Candace or something to that effect. Um, if I got that wrong, please correct me, but I believe that's what he was saying. The part that became distasteful is when you're saying things like, "And I won't lose." Like, what is this about? You know what I'm saying? I'm just trying to figure out people's intentions here. What is this about? Is this about getting to the the truth? Is this about Candace making you her security team member or no? You know, I'm not trying to go to war with no Green Beret you remember. You know what I'm saying? Like I would lose that. But the point that I'm making is in this YouTube world, in this investigation, what is the number one goal? Figuring out what happened that day. I've been covering SCOPs and exposees and Freemasonry and all this type of stuff on my channel for years. So that's why I'm so invested in this. And people that want to question why I've been covering it so much or why many of us are covering it so much, I can speak for myself and I can say it was no different with the Diddy case when P. Diddy came out and all these allegations came out. I literally have like maybe a 60 video playlist on this channel called No Diddy playlist. I covered that a whole lot as well, right? Because if these things are are what's trending and is is things to be exposed in the process, I'm a content creator, right? That's what I do. And I do want to in fairness to him, I want to play the clip where he addressed people calling him him gay or something to that effect. In fairness, because I want a man to be able to speak for himself. These are not allegations of myself. This is him responding to it. Oh, that's cuz he likes it up the ass. Uh yeah. Oh, guys, also my wife doesn't think this is funny. Uh, somebody posted a picture and did a YouTube video which got me standing next to my wife and her two best friends who are gay by the way. And uh, they made a whole YouTube video on how my wife's a stripper and I'm a gay guy. [laughter] So uh, my wife was a oral surgery technician before she quit her job to work for the business. And uh, yeah, I'm probably gay as [ __ ] dude. I'm like Benny Johnson, boys. You can put video. You guys think that that's going to make me upset if you like it makes my wife upset because she wasn't a stripper. But if you call me a [ __ ] or sorry, I shouldn't say [ __ ] You call me a gay dude. Like guys, you're not gonna Yeah, sure. Duh. I was a University of Oregon cheerleader. You think I You think I haven't gotten the gay jokes, guys? It's fine, man. We have gay friends. It's not a big >> Yeah. So, I I I wanted him to end this clip because I don't want to seem as if I'm I'm misrepresenting something. He's addressed it. Um, whatever. But my ultimate point is there's nothing wrong with with disagreeing with the position from Candace, but I want to make sure that people understand there isn't a Candace Owen side and a in and the other side. There's a pursuing truth side and then there's a not pursuing truth side. That's the way I I I I view this stuff. But when I look at a YouTuber drinking, you know, you know, hours upon hours on these YouTube lives and you get to a point where you have countless super chats and you're giving ultimatums to somebody who on a on a surface level appear to just be trying to figure out what happened to her friend. It's like we're getting away from the main point here and it's it it's almost coming off about personalities. You see what I'm saying? And that right there I think is humiliating yourself by definition respectfully saying that Baron Coleman and uh what's the guy other guy's name? Coach Collin attacked him. Um I wouldn't say that they attacked you. In fact I would say that they went light on it. I would say I went a little bit harder than they did, you know. But I think speaking in one sense like saying I support something while also publicly attacking that person or maybe you all won't like the word attack publicly giving this person an ultimatum when you know that they're on a holiday break comes off a bit contradictory like almost like an oxymoron right and so Candace don't need anybody to speak up for her. She's her own person her own adult her own grown woman. She has a husband to defend her. I'm not here to defend Canda