Up Next
Charlie Kirk Defends Christian Values and Death Penalty at Florida State University Campus Event
19:50
Charlie Kirk Sits Down with Bill Maher on Club Random: Discussing Faith, Politics, and Cultural Battles
1:10:43
Charlie Kirk Debates Young Turks Contributor Ben Carollo on Marxism in America and Communism's Historical Record
52:52
Related Books
Browse Conservative Books
Charlie Kirk Debates Atheism, Morality, and the Bible with Bill Maher on Faith and Society
Charlie Kirk engages in a philosophical debate about atheism, morality, and religious foundations with Bill Maher. The conversation explores fundamental questions about the source of moral codes, whether society needs religion to determine what is good, and the role of Christianity in shaping Western values. Maher argues that morality is intrinsic and doesn't require religious threats or rewards, while Kirk challenges whether societies without Christian foundations can arrive at the same moral conclusions. The exchange touches on the Ten Commandments, atheistic regimes like North Korea and Communist China, and whether the Bible remains the best moral framework for humanity.
Atheism Versus Agnosticism: Defining the Terms
The conversation begins with a discussion about the common misconceptions surrounding atheism. Maher explains that atheism isn't about definitively saying "there's no God," but rather admitting uncertainty. He references Richard Dawkins' perspective that atheists simply believe in one less god than theists do—where ancient peoples believed in many gods, then monotheists believed in one, atheists just go one step further.
When asked how this differs from agnosticism, Maher suggests there isn't much difference. Many atheists view the distinction as splitting hairs, sharing a common ground of "I don't know and I'll never know." This perspective means not spending much time thinking about divine questions, not attending church, but still striving to be a good person because it's intrinsically beneficial for society and the individual—without needing the threat of eternal punishment as motivation.
The Role of Eternal Judgment in Behavior
Kirk presses an important point: even if Maher doesn't personally need the threat of judgment, does he acknowledge that some people do act better when they believe they'll be held eternally accountable? Maher readily agrees, calling it a "big admission." This acknowledgment opens a deeper question about how society determines what constitutes good behavior without a religious framework.
Maher suggests this is precisely what government constantly wrestles with—determining what makes society good. But Kirk pushes further, asking whether even an atheist would admit the Ten Commandments provide a solid starting point for moral law.
Debating the Ten Commandments
Maher's response reveals his selective approach to biblical law. He claims to have a problem with eight of the ten commandments because only two—don't kill and don't steal—are actually encoded into law. The first four commandments, he argues, are just about a "jealous God," using colorful language to dismiss them as divine insecurity rather than moral guidance.
Kirk challenges this characterization, pointing out that honoring one's parents isn't about divine jealousy. He also highlights the beauty in commandments like observing the Sabbath—taking a day to rest rather than constant toil. Maher counters by questioning why religion is necessary to arrive at these conclusions. Why would you need religious doctrine to tell you not to kill each other and to take a day off? These things, he argues, are simply intrinsic to human wellbeing.
Christianity's Role in Moral Development
Kirk makes a critical historical argument: if these values are truly intrinsic to humanity, why do countries without Christian foundations struggle to reach these same moral realizations? He points to Communist China under Mao—a resolutely atheist regime—as an example of a society that failed to naturally arrive at these "intrinsic" moral truths.
Maher pushes back with a monologue he delivered on his show "Religulous," arguing that supposedly atheistic societies like North Korea aren't actually atheistic at all. Instead, they've simply replaced God with the leader of the country. North Korean beliefs about Kim Jong-un constitute a complete deification—winter turned to spring when he was born, he'll be immortal in heaven, he got eleven holes-in-one the first time he played golf, and he invented the hamburger. These claims, Maher notes, are more improbable than a virgin birth.
Kirk concedes that point but emphasizes that both China and the Soviet Union had hardcore anti-Christian movements, suggesting there's something about Christianity specifically that these regimes needed to suppress.
Searching for a Moral Code
This leads to Kirk's fundamental question: what code or book does Maher think is best for humanity to live by? Kirk openly states he believes the Bible is that book. Maher jokes about having a book called "Not the Bible," then acknowledges there's "a lot of good stuff" in the Bible—loving your neighbor, helping others—but accuses Kirk of cherrypicking.
Kirk defends the biblical narrative as fundamentally a story of love and redemption. The entire arc of the Bible, from Old Testament to New, centers on God's love for humanity and humanity's need for redemption. Maher responds that this is "a charitable way of looking at it," pointing out that the Bible is a giant anthology written over centuries by many different writers, containing many different things—not a single coherent text written by God.
The Philosophical Divide
The exchange reveals the core philosophical divide between religious and secular worldviews. Kirk argues that Christianity provides an objective moral framework that has proven essential for developing free, prosperous societies. Without that foundation, he suggests, societies drift toward either moral relativism or the deification of the state.
Maher maintains that morality is accessible through reason and human nature alone, without requiring supernatural beliefs or threats of punishment. He sees religion as unnecessary scaffolding around truths that humans can and should discover independently.
The conversation demonstrates that despite their differences, both participants agree on many moral conclusions—the value of not killing, not stealing, taking rest, treating others well. The disagreement lies in whether these shared values require a religious foundation or emerge naturally from human reasoning and social necessity.
Video Transcript
[00:01] misnomer about atheism is that we say,
[00:05] "Oh, there's no God." No, we just we
[00:07] just say we don't know. As Richard
[00:09] Dawkins always says, there's theism,
[00:11] which is belief in gods, and they used
[00:14] to believe in many, and then it got to
[00:16] one, and we just believe in one less.
[00:18] So, there's just just not. How would you
[00:21] differentiate that from agnosticism?
[00:23] There isn't. That's that's another thing
[00:24] that's No, I I I don't I'm
[00:26] just asking a good faith question. No, I
[00:28] think a lot of atheists think that. A
[00:30] lot of people on my team with this, they
[00:32] have that view that, you know, don't
[00:34] split hairs with the atheists and the
[00:36] agnostics. It's like it's we're on some
[00:39] part of I don't know and I really and
[00:41] I'll never know. So, I really don't
[00:43] think about it a lot. I don't get up for
[00:45] church. I try to be a good person
[00:47] because I just think intrinsically it's
[00:50] it's good for society. It's good for me
[00:53] to be a good person as much as I can.
[00:56] And I don't need the threat of the
[00:58] pitchfork in the ass to do it. Can I can
[01:01] I ask a question? So, how how
[01:05] But you even acknowledge though that
[01:07] some people act better if they feel as
[01:09] if they'll be judged eternally. Totally.
[01:11] Okay. No, that's that's a big that's a
[01:13] big admission. But Oh, yes. How do you
[01:15] think society best determines what is
[01:17] good?
[01:20] That's a great question. I mean, isn't
[01:22] that what government is always wrestling
[01:24] with? What makes society good? Do you
[01:27] think even as an atheist, the ten
[01:29] commandments, the right side of the ten
[01:31] commandments is a good place to start.
[01:32] The right side. Well, because the left
[01:34] side, I think you'd have a big problem,
[01:35] right? I have a problem with with eight
[01:37] of the 10 because only two of them are
[01:39] laws. You got a problem with eight of
[01:41] the 10. Two of them are laws. Only two.
[01:43] What do you mean? Don't kill and don't
[01:45] steal. Okay. And don't steal. Sure. Like
[01:49] I mean this idea that God is You're good
[01:52] with those two. Like the first four are
[01:53] just jealous God It's just like,
[01:56] you know what? God, honoring your
[01:58] parents is not jealous God stuff. God's
[02:00] like a pimp who was in the next room and
[02:02] he said, "Who you on the phone with
[02:04] there,
[02:05] girl?" You know, I mean, I mean, I guess
[02:08] I'm testing that. Hold on. But no, it's
[02:10] again, I'm I'm not offendable on this,
[02:11] but I think you could I know you made
[02:13] fun of it religious, but there's
[02:15] something beautiful about not working
[02:16] for a day. Oh, you mean like honoring
[02:20] the Sabbath? Oh, I a week is even
[02:22] better. Um, well, the Sabbath. No, I
[02:25] mean the Sabbath is slowing down and
[02:27] saying that we're not toil for But do
[02:30] you need Why would you need a religion
[02:32] to get to that? Why would you need a
[02:34] religion to hey, let's not kill each
[02:37] other and uh take a day off? Like I
[02:40] again, I don't need a threat or a carrot
[02:43] for that. It just it's just so
[02:45] intrinsic. It's it sort of reminds me of
[02:47] the beginning of the Declaration of
[02:49] Independence. If it's intrinsic, then
[02:51] why is it that a lot of countries that
[02:53] don't have Christianity struggle to come
[02:56] to these realizations that for example
[03:00] you know communist China again no Hitler
[03:02] analogies right under Mao which was
[03:05] which was resolutely atheist right
[03:07] resolutely yeah I mean well no I did a
[03:10] monologue in religious it might have
[03:12] confucism underlying it I did a
[03:14] monologue in religious about that very
[03:16] subject which is uh the people who say
[03:19] oh these atheistic societies like like
[03:23] uh North Korea and no those kind of
[03:27] societies they just replaced the leader
[03:30] of the country for a god they are not
[03:32] atheistic when you look at what the
[03:35] Korean the North Korean people believe
[03:37] about Kim Jong-un it's a deification of
[03:39] it's a de I mean completely the same
[03:41] that he when he was born winter
[03:43] turned to spring he once he'll be
[03:46] immortal in the heaven first time he
[03:47] played golf he got 11 ho holes in one.
[03:50] He invented the hamburger. I'm not
[03:52] making that's more improbable than a
[03:53] virgin birth. It is. It really is. I'm
[03:56] not making this up. But they believe
[03:58] that. So don't tell me North Korea is
[04:00] atheistic. They're not atheistic. But
[04:03] but they there is a in in China at least
[04:08] and of course in the Soviet Union there
[04:10] was a anti-Christian movement. Very
[04:12] hard. Very hardcore. So I guess like
[04:14] what code and I'm not saying this
[04:16] sarcastically like what code what book
[04:18] do you think is best for humanity to
[04:20] live by? I say the Bible. What would you
[04:22] say?
[04:24] No, it's an important it's important
[04:26] philosophical question, right? I have a
[04:27] book called Not the Bible. Okay, I'm
[04:30] kidding. There's literally so not loving
[04:32] your neighbor and not like you know
[04:33] helping. There's a lot of good stuff
[04:35] there. Okay, but again it's let me tell
[04:37] you why I'm asking. You're
[04:38] cherrypicking. I'm Come on, Charlie. The
[04:41] story of the Bible is one of love and
[04:43] redemption. There's a lot in the Bible.
[04:46] It is. It's a story of love. The Old
[04:48] Testament, well, the entire arc of the
[04:50] Bible is a story of love and a need for
[04:52] humans redemption. Well, that's a
[04:54] charitable way of looking at it. And
[04:56] that's in there. There's a lot of things
[04:57] in there because it's a giant anthology
[05:00] over centuries of many different
[05:01] writers. There is a lot in the Bible.
[05:03] theirs. It wasn't written by God,
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.