Charlie Kirk Defends Donald Trump Against Claims of Divisiveness at College Campus Event

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Confronts Texas Student Over Fascism Claims About Trump at Michigan State Campus

Charlie Kirk Confronts Texas Student Over Fascism Claims About Trump at Michigan State Campus

10:57

Charlie Kirk on Trump's Deportation Blitz and the Battle Tested Team Rolling Back Biden's Open Border Policies

Charlie Kirk on Trump's Deportation Blitz and the Battle Tested Team Rolling Back Biden's Open Border Policies

10:23

Charlie Kirk's Billion View TikTok Compilation Reveals Campus Conversations That Shaped the Election

Charlie Kirk's Billion View TikTok Compilation Reveals Campus Conversations That Shaped the Election

25:10

Charlie Kirk banner
2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018

Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.

Charlie Kirk Defends Donald Trump Against Claims of Divisiveness at College Campus Event

Charlie Kirk confronts a student who argues that Donald Trump's combative political style divides America and creates dangerous tensions. The student points to inflammatory rhetoric and January 6 as evidence. Kirk flips the narrative, highlighting assassination attempts against Trump, left-wing violence including a professor punching a Trump supporter, and the media's role in spreading propaganda. He argues Trump delivers on promises while facing an existential threat from the left, rejecting the premise that Trump is the source of division in American politics.

May 4, 2025

Student Questions Trump's Political Style

At a college campus event, a student approached Charlie Kirk with concerns about Donald Trump's approach to politics. The student expressed that Trump has built his political career around degrading, belittling, and insulting anyone who disagrees with him. Citing the biblical principle that a house divided against itself cannot stand, the student argued that Trump's confrontational style is making America more divided and will have dire long-term repercussions.

Kirk immediately challenged the framing, asking what the relevant question was given that Trump won the election. The student clarified he wanted to know if Kirk agreed that Trump's approach to politics and the current stigma would be harmful for the country's future.

Kirk Defends Trump's Record

Kirk acknowledged that Trump says things he wouldn't say and employs a style different from his own approach. However, he pivoted to Trump's track record of keeping promises. When the student challenged this by pointing to the Ukraine war not ending on day one as promised, Kirk emphasized Trump's achievements on border security.

Kirk stated the border is now totally secure with literally nobody coming across the southern border, crediting Trump's first term with keeping promise after promise. He posed a direct question to the student: would you prefer someone like Donald Trump with a style you don't like, or someone like George W. Bush with a style you like who was a terrible, awful, lying president?

The Violence Debate

The student argued that Trump's style leads to vulgar demonstrations and makes it difficult for Americans to work with one another. He cited January 6 and riots on the left as examples of this polarization. Kirk immediately countered by pointing to a recent incident where a professor punched a student at that very campus for wearing a Trump hat, emphasizing that it was the other side committing the violence.

When the student insisted both sides were responsible, Kirk challenged him to name a single example of right-wing violence within the last three years. The student struggled to provide a recent example. Kirk then listed numerous instances of left-wing violence: Tesla dealerships being burned, daily death threats against Tulsi Gabbard and President Trump, and most significantly, Trump being shot on July 13th in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Kirk expressed frustration with the narrative that Trump divides the country when Trump himself has been shot, survived an assassination attempt, continues keeping promises, while the left tries to murder conservatives in the streets, punches students in the face, and hunts down anyone wearing Trump-supporting hats.

Clarifying the Concerns

The student clarified he wasn't supporting left-wing violence and condemned the incidents Kirk mentioned, including the student being punched and the Tesla burnings. However, he maintained that the president of the United States has a responsibility to unite people, and that Trump's behavior contributes to rising tensions on both sides.

When Kirk dismissed January 6 as mostly peaceful with 90% of attendees doing nothing violent, the student pushed back, noting that just because it happened four years ago rather than three doesn't make it less significant. Kirk countered that fewer than 50 people were violent there while over 2,000 people were arrested or convicted in the largest manhunt in federal government history. He contrasted this with the summer of 2020, when material violent crime rose across the country.

Examining Trump's Antagonism

Kirk pressed the student to explain exactly how Trump antagonizes people. The student pointed to Trump's treatment of Republicans as well as Democrats. When Kirk demanded specific examples, the student referenced a 2015 Iowa forum incident involving John McCain. Kirk dismissed this as a decade-old example and challenged the student to name anything within the last decade that demonstrates Trump dividing the country.

The student then brought up the debate against Kamala Harris, specifically Trump's statement about illegal immigrants eating cats and dogs, calling it fear-mongering with little evidence. Kirk strongly disagreed, stating the student had been propagandized by the media. He explained that in Springfield, Ohio, there were reports of over 75 missing dogs, and that Haitians are known to pick up and eat cats as part of voodoo culture, where cats are believed to be spiritual animals.

Kirk argued there's substantial truth to what Trump said and questioned how this antagonizes the other side. The student responded that it creates a situation that seems worse than it actually is and is offensive to illegal immigrants. Kirk's response was direct: he expressed mock apology for offending people who broke into the country illegally, suggesting they should leave if they're offended.

The Bigger Picture

When the student corrected himself to say legal immigrants, Kirk made his broader point: the student was nitpicking things Trump has said while Trump faces an existential force trying to destroy the country and debase everything conservatives care about. Kirk characterized Joe Biden allowing 10 million people into the country with no idea who they were as high treason.

The student acknowledged the Biden administration's border approach wasn't the best but pointed to attempts at bipartisan legislation. Kirk called this a scam, arguing no bill was needed since Biden could have acted without one, just as Trump closed the border in 10 days with no legislation. He accused the student of believing media propaganda.

When the student insisted that Biden pushed forward border security policy in the summer before the election working with Republicans, and that Trump called to kill the bill because it wouldn't be good for the election, Kirk again rejected this narrative. He pointed out that the bill would have allowed 5,000 people per day to cross the border, and that none of it was necessary since Trump closed the border on day one of his new term.

Kirk's Final Assessment

Kirk concluded that the country didn't need a bill, it needed a new president. He rejected the entire premise of the student's concerns, stating the student should be coming up to thank Trump for fighting for Americans every single day rather than nitpicking something said 10 years ago at an Iowa forum. He emphasized that Trump should be judged by what he does and how he delivers on promises for the American people every single day.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!